A randomized trial of induction doses of interferon alone or in combination with ribavirin or ribavirin plus amantadine for treatment of nonresponder patients with chronic hepatitis C

Background Efficacy and safety of interferon induction therapy alone or in combination with ribavirin or ribavirin plus amantadine were evaluated in chronic hepatitis C patients who were nonresponders to primary antiviral treatment. Methods The study was designed to have 225 HCV nonresponder patients, but at an interim analysis the response rate difference between groups was lower than expected and the enrollment was stopped when 75 patients had been randomized to receive interferon-α2a (group A, n = 26), interferon-α2a plus 15 mg/kg per day of ribavirin (group B, n = 24), or interferon-α2a plus ribavirin plus 200 mg/day of amantadine hydrochloride (group C, n = 25). Treatment duration was 48 weeks. The dose of interferon was 6 MU/day for 4 weeks followed by 3 MU/day for the remaining 44 weeks. Results On intention-to-treat, the sustained virological response at 24 weeks of follow-up was 11.5% in group A, 12.5% in group B, and 12% in group C. Therapy was discontinued because of adverse effects in three patients in group A (11.5%), three in group B (12.5%), and two in group C (8%). Conclusions Nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C may achieve a sustained virological response rate of approximately 12% if retreated with interferon induction treatment followed by administration of a daily dose. The addition of ribavirin or amantadine did not seem to improve the response rates.     

Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin combination therapy in postliver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C virus infection

Posttransplant hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence is universal in chronic hepatitis C recipients. Antiviral therapy is suggested after liver transplant to halt disease progression. Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin therapy remains the standard of care in many areas where direct antiviral agents are poorly accessible. This study aimed to assess the treatment efficacy and safety of the regimen for Taiwanese patients with post-transplant HCV recurrence. Nine patients with HCV recurrence postliver transplantation were allocated. Patients received either pegylated interferon α-2a 180 μg/wk or pegylated interferon α-2b 1.5 mg/kg/wk plus ribavirin for 24–48 weeks. The primary endpoint was the achievement of sustained virological response (SVR), defined as undetectable HCV RNA throughout 6 months of follow-up after the end of treatment. The safety profiles were also documented. The rates of rapid virological response, early virological response, end-of-treatment virological response, and SVR were 33%, 63%, 75%, and 56% respectively. Of the four patients who failed antiviral treatment, the treatment responses were nonresponse (n = 1), loss of follow-up (n = 1), and relapse (n = 2). Three patients terminated therapy early due to severe adverse events, including severe anemia, intra-abdomen infection, and hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence. One of the three patients who terminated treatment early at Week 6 experienced rapid virological response followed by SVR. Pegylated interferon/ribavirin combination allowed a chance for cure with a fair SVR rate in Taiwanese chronic hepatitis C patients postliver transplantation. Early identification of side effects and careful monitoring during therapy might enhance the treatment efficacy.     

Combined interferon α2b and cyclosporin A in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: controlled trial

Background. Only 15% to 20% of patients with chronic hepatitis C have a sustained virological response to interferon monotherapy. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and safety of interferon, in combination with oral cyclosporin A, with interferon monotherapy in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Methods. We assigned 120 patients with chronic hepatitis C to receive the standard Japanese dose of interferon α2b alone for 24 weeks or that dose of interferon α2b in combination with cyclosporin A, at doses of 200 mg daily for the first 4 weeks and 100 mg daily for the following 20 weeks. All patients were assessed for drug safety, tolerance, and efficacy at the end of weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48. Efficacy was assessed by the disappearance of serum hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA by polymerase chain reaction and normalization of serum aminotransferase. The primary endpoint was a sustained virological response; i.e., sustained undetectable serum HCV RNA at 48 weeks. Results. The sustained virological response rate was significantly higher in the combination therapy group (42/76) than in the monotherapy group (14/44; P = 0.01). The sustained biochemical response rate was also higher in the combination therapy group (46/76) than in the monotherapy group (17/44; P = 0.017). In patients with genotype 1 and high viral loads, the sustained virological response rate was markedly higher in the combination therapy group (16/38) than in the monotherapy group (1/21; P = 0.006). Side-effect profiles were similar in the two groups. Conclusions. In patients with chronic hepatitis C; combined interferon and cyclosporin A treatment was more effective than interferon monotherapy. The benefit was mostly achieved in patients with a high viral load and HCV genotype 1. Received: March 12, 2002 / Accepted: November 22, 2002 RID="*" ID="*" Reprint requests to: K. Inoue     

Antiviral therapy (pegylated interferon and ribavirin) of hepatitis C in dialysis patients: meta‐analysis of clinical studies

Information on the antiviral treatment (pegylated interferon plus ribavirin) of chronic infection by hepatitis C virus (HCV) in patients on long‐term dialysis is extremely limited. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of combination antiviral therapy (pegylated interferon plus ribavirin) in patients on long‐term dialysis with chronic hepatitis C by performing a systematic review of the literature with a meta‐analysis of clinical studies. The primary outcome was sustained virological response (SVR) (as a measure of efficacy); the secondary outcome was dropout rate (as a measure of tolerability). We used the random‐effects model of DerSimonian and Laird, with heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses. We identified eleven clinical studies (287 unique patients), two of them being controlled clinical trials. The summary estimate for SVR and dropout rate was 0.60 (95% Confidence Intervals, 0.47; 0.71) and 0.18 (95% CI, 0.08; 0.35), respectively; studies being heterogeneous with regard to both the outcomes. Stratified analysis reported a higher SVR rate in controlled trials, 0.86 (95% CI, 0.27; 0.99). The most common sources of dropout were anaemia (11/46 = 23%) and infections (6/46 = 13%). Meta‐regression analysis showed a detrimental impact of HCV genotype 1 (P = 0.036) and dropout (P = 0.0001) rate upon the frequency of SVR. Antiviral therapy based on pegylated interferon plus ribavirin for HCV gives encouraging results in terms of efficacy and safety among patients on long‐term dialysis; such approach should be considered the current standard of care for HCV‐infected individuals on regular dialysis.     

Daily or three times per week interferon α-2b in combination with ribavirin or interferon alone for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C not responding to previous interferon alone

Background/Aims: We compared the efficacy and safety of the combined therapy of daily interferon α-2b and ribavirin with those of interferon α-2b three times per week alone or in combination with ribavirin in non-responder patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.Methods: A total of 376 patients were randomly assigned to receive interferon α-2b (6 MU three times per week for 24 weeks followed by 3 MU three times per week for 24 weeks) alone (group A) or in combination with ribavirin for 48 weeks (group B), or daily interferon α-2b (3 MU per day for 24 weeks followed by 3 MU three times per week for 24 weeks) and ribavirin (group C).Results: After 24 weeks of therapy, HCV RNA was undetectable in 11.7, 24.0, and 37.8% for groups A, B, and C, respectively. Sustained virological response was more frequent in patients who received combination therapy with three times weekly interferon (20.9%) or daily interferon (26.0%) than in patients who received interferon alone (5.8%) (P<0.001). The predictive HCV parameters for sustained response were a low viral load on day 7 and a negative HCV RNA on week 12.Conclusions: In conclusion, in non-responder patients with chronic hepatitis C, virological response with daily interferon and ribavirin, compared to interferon monotherapy, was significantly improved during treatment, although sustained virological response was similar for both combination therapies with ribavirin and three times a week or daily interferon.     

Efficacy of a short‐term ribavirin plus interferon alpha combination therapy followed by interferon alpha alone in previously untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C: a randomized multicenter trial

Abstract: Background: Combination therapy with interferon alpha (IFNα) plus ribavirin has been shown to improve the sustained response rate in patients with chronic hepatitis C but there is little information regarding the lengths of time for this therapeutic regimen. In this study we therefore tried to evaluate whether the analysis of different virological parameters could provide new clues with respect to the early determination of the efficacy of this form of combination therapy. Furthermore, we also examined whether short‐term induction combination therapy followed by IFNα alone is more effective than monotherapy in mounting an initial as well as a sustained virological response. Methods: 185 patients with histologically proven chronic hepatitis C (mean age 42 years (range 19–65 years); 110 males, 75 females) were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to receive, over the first 12 weeks, either interferon alpha 2a 6 million units (MU) three times weekly plus ribavirin 14 mg/kg per day (n=93) or the same dose of IFNα alone (n=92). Patients with a virological response (serum HCV RNA undetectable) after 12 weeks were subsequently treated with 3 MU IFNα alone thrice weekly for a further 40 weeks. Otherwise, treatment was discontinued. After the end of treatment, patients were followed up for 24 weeks. Results: Patient characteristics at baseline were not significantly different in the two treatment groups. An initial virological response at week 12 was seen in 61 (66%) patients receiving IFNα plus ribavirin and in 44 (48%) being treated with IFNα alone (p=0.015) and this improvement in the response rate was mainly restricted to HCV genotype 1‐infected patients (58% vs. 38%). In contrast, end‐of‐treatment (week 52) and sustained virological response rates were similar in both groups (37% vs. 29% and 26% vs. 17% [p=0.1], respectively). Interestingly, patients with HCV genotype 3, however, clearly benefited from short‐term combination therapy. Thus, sustained virological response rates in these patients significantly increased from 25% (IFNα monotherapy) to 59% (combination therapy) (p=0.05). Conclusions: Short‐term combined therapy for 12 weeks is more effective than the monotherapy with respect to the induction of an initial virological response but this effect applies only to genotype 1‐infected patients. However, there is no significant difference between both therapeutic schedules with regard to the induction of sustained response. Although HCV genotype 3‐infected patients seem to benefit from this short‐term combined therapy, prolonged combined therapy may be necessary in HCV genotype 1‐infected patients.     

A pilot study of recombinant interferon beta‐1a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C

Abstract: Aims: Interferon alpha monotherapy induces a sustained response in less than 20% of patients treated for chronic hepatitis C. Interferon beta represents a potential therapeutic alternative for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of recombinant interferon beta‐1a administered subcutaneously. Methods: Twenty‐one drug‐naive patients with chronic hepatitis C were treated with recombinant interferon beta‐1a administered, subcutaneously, for 24 weeks using two different regimens: 9 MU, three times per week (n=11) and 12 MU, three times per week (n=10). Results: At the end of the treatment period, nine (43%) patients had a biochemical and virological response (i.e. normal ALT and absence of hepatitis C virus RNA by PCR). Four of these patients were in the 9 MU group and five in the 12 MU group. A biochemical and virological sustained response occurred in four (19%) patients, all in the 9 MU dose group. The 4 patients with a sustained response maintained their response during a follow‐up period of 33 to 58 months. Side effects were mild and 19 (90%) patients completed the treatment period. Conclusions: The results of this pilot study indicate that interferon beta‐1a administered subcutaneously is an effective therapy for some patients with chronic hepatitis C, and suggest that interferon beta‐1a deserves further evaluations in larger trials especially in combination with ribavirin.     

Triple antiviral therapy in hepatitis C virus infection with or without mixed cryoglobulinaemia: A prospective,controlled pilot study

BackgroundMixed cryoglobulinaemia is strongly related to hepatitis C virus infection. Treatment with peg-interferon and ribavirin has been indicated as first-line therapy for mild/moderate hepatitis C virus-related mixed cryoglobulinaemia.AimTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of triple boceprevir-based antiviral therapy in patients with or without mixed cryoglobulinaemia previously treated with peg-interferon and ribavirin, and with advanced liver disease.MethodsThirty-five hepatitis C virus-positive patients (17 with asymptomatic mixed cryoglobulinaemia, 5 with symptomatic mixed cryoglobulinaemia, and 11 without mixed cryoglobulinaemia) were treated with triple boceprevir-based antiviral therapy.ResultsIn 19/22 cryoglobulinaemic subjects (86%), the addition of boceprevir induced cryocrit disappearance. Cryocrit behaviour was related to virological response, with improvement of symptoms upon undetectable viraemia and reappearance after virological breakthrough. The rate of sustained virological response was lower in cryoglobulinaemic patients than in patients without mixed cryoglobulinaemia (23.8% vs 70% respectively, p = 0.01).ConclusionBoceprevir-based therapy was safe and effective in cryoglobulinaemic patients. The correlation between direct inhibition of hepatitis C virus replication and clinical improvement in mixed cryoglobulinaemic patients is definitive proof of the key pathogenetic role played by viral replication. Further studies are needed to confirm and clarify the reduced virological response in patients with mixed cryoglobulinaemia.     

Regression of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C after therapy with interferon and ribavirin

Interferon and ribavirin decrease necroinflammation in chronic hepatitis C with or without virological clearance; however, reversibility of fibrosis remains to be established. We evaluated the effect of combination therapy on virological and liver histopathological outcomes in 52 naïve patients and 79 patients unresponsive to interferon monotherapy with predominantly genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C. One hundred four patients completed interferon and ribavirin treatment after 24–48 weeks. Fifty-six paired liver biopsies (mean biopsy interval 28 months) were assessed by the Ishak score. Sustained virological responses were 37% in naïve patients and 22% in re-treated patients. In virological responders and nonresponders, fibrosis and necroinflammation scores decreased by –0.91 (P =0.04) and –0.5 (P =0.02) and by –2.8 (P =0.001) and –0.66 (P =0.06), respectively. Interferon and ribavirin had greater benefit on fibrosis when associated with clearance of HCV RNA. Treatment strategies in virological nonresponders who show fibrosis regression should include consideration of maintenance therapy, if such treatment eventually proves to benefit histological outcomes.     

Hepatitis C virus RNA load in relapsed patients: week two of treatment is the best time to predict the complete response

OBJECTIVE: An early virological response has been shown to be predictive of a sustained virological response to antiviral treatment in chronic hepatitis C infection. The aim of the study was to analyse viral kinetics during the first 6 weeks of treatment (interferon plus ribavirin) in 18 relapsed hepatitis C patients after a first course of interferon monotherapy. METHODS: We studied 18 relapsed patients treated with interferon and ribavirin. A sustained virological response (negative HCV RNA measured by polymerase chain reaction 6 months after the end of therapy) was obtained in 12 patients. Samples were obtained before therapy and each week for 6 weeks during therapy; HCV RNA levels were determined using quantitative bDNA. RESULTS: At the end of week two, a viral-load drop of more than 2.20 log was observed in all the 12 patients with a sustained virological response and in none of the six other patients. When we considered the median of the viral load reduction from baseline for each week of treatment, week two appeared to be the time point most predictive of a sustained viral response (positive predictive value 83%; negative predictive value 92%). CONCLUSION: During treatment with interferon plus ribavirin in relapsed hepatitis C patients, viral kinetics showed that the second week of treatment appeared to be the time point most predictive of a sustained viral response.     

Tenofovir‐based alternate therapies for chronic hepatitis B patients with partial virological response to entecavir

Entecavir (ETV) is a first‐line antiviral therapy for treating chronic hepatitis B (CHB); however, some patients have suboptimal response to ETV. Currently, there are limited data on how to approach these patients. Therefore, our aim was to compare the effectiveness of two alternate therapies – tenofovir (TDF) monotherapy and combination therapy of ETV+TDF – in CHB patients with ETV partial virological response. We conducted a retrospective study of 68 patients who had partial virological response to ETV, defined as having detectable HBV DNA following at least 12 months of ETV, and were switched to TDF monotherapy (n = 25) or ETV+TDF (n = 43). Patients were seen in seven US liver/community‐based clinics and started on ETV between 2005 and 2009. The majority of patients were male; the vast majority were Asian and had positive hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg). Patients in both groups had similar pretreatment characteristics. Complete viral suppression (CVS) rates with TDF monotherapy and ETV+TDF were similar after 6 months (71% vs 83%, P = 0.23) and 12 months (86% vs 84%, P = 0.85), and there was no statistically significant difference in CVS rates even when only patients with higher HBV DNA levels at switch (>1000 IU/mL) were evaluated. Multivariate analysis indicated that ETV+TDF was not an independent predictor of CVS compared to TDF monotherapy (OR = 1.19, P = 0.63). In conclusion, TDF monotherapy and ETV+TDF are comparable in achieving CVS in CHB patients with partial virological response to ETV. Long‐term alternate therapy with one pill (TDF monotherapy) vs two pills (ETV+TDF) could lead to lower nonadherence rates and better treatment outcomes.     

High rate of sustained response to consensus interferon plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C patients resistant to alpha-interferon and ribavirin: a pilot study

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate an alternative treatment (consensus interferon plus ribavirin) for chronic hepatitis C patients resistant to combined therapy. Methods: Fourteen patients previously resistant to interferon alpha plus ribavirin were consecutively assigned to receive 15 μg of consensus interferon plus ribavirin (1000 mg) daily for 4 weeks, and 9–15 μg every other day plus daily ribavirin for the following 44 weeks. Alanine aminotransferase and hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA (Amplicor Monitor; Roche) levels were monitored during therapy and for 24 weeks after its completion. Results: A rapid and marked decrease of HCV RNA viremia of more than 2 logs was observed in 10 (71%) of 14 patients at week 2 of treatment. At the end of therapy, 10 (71%) of 14 patients had undetectable HCV RNA. The end-of-treatment response rates were 6 of 9 (67%) patients for genotype 1 and 4 of 5 (80%) for other genotypes. Sustained response was observed in 4 (36%) of 11 patients who completed 24 weeks of follow-up. Conclusions: A marked and rapid decrease of viral load was observed during therapy with high doses of consensus interferon plus ribavirin in patients previously resistant to combined therapy, even in those infected with genotype 1. Of 11 patients who completed the post-treatment follow-up, 36% presented a sustained response. Received July 23, 2001 / Accepted: January 25, 2002 Reprint requests to: S.K. Ono-Nita Editorial on page 766     

Etiologic treatment of hepatitis C virus-associated mixed cryoglobulinemia

The treatment of mixed cryoglobulinemia (MC) includes several drugs steroids, cyclosporins, colchicine, plasmapheresis but given the documented association between MC and hepatitis C virus (HCV), the treatment of choice seems to be antiviral therapy. Several authors have reported the efficacy of interferon (IFN) alpha in the inhibition of HCV replication and reduction of cryoglobulin levels. The therapy with IFN as monotherapy in MC shows a complete response rate in only 10 12% of cases. Complete response to therapy using a combination of IFN plus ribavirin varies in different studies from 18% to 64% of cases. There are only two studies on the treatment of MC with peginter- feron plus ribavirin. Both studies, given the high number of complete responders, reinforce the idea that peginterferon plus ribavirin is, at present, the best avaible treatment for cryoglobulinemic syndrome. The results obtained with peginterferon combined therapy are superior to standard interferon plus ribavirin in treatment-naive patients. In fact, a sustained virological response was observed in 44% of patients; the same results were obtained for clinical (purpura and arthralgia disappearance) and biochemical (aminotransaminases normalization) responses. New drug combinations, like peginterferons plus anti-CD20 antibodies, should be considered for treatment of MC in the future.     

Immune-mediated liver dysfunction after antiviral treatment in liver transplanted patients with hepatitis c: Allo or autoimmune de novo hepatitis?

BackgroundThe recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation is extremely frequent. Antiviral therapy combining pegylated-interferon with ribavirin is therefore increasingly used in these patients. It has been recently reported, however, that during antiviral treatment a hepatic immune-mediated liver dysfunction, similar to “de novo” autoimmune hepatitis, may develop in a few transplanted patients.Patients and methodsThree patients, treated with pegylated-interferon α-2a and ribavirin for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation, developed an aggressive hepatitis with clinical, biochemical, and histological features similar to those of autoimmune hepatitis.ResultsIn all three patients, a liver enzymes increase was evident after hepatitis C virus-RNA had become undetectable. Diagnosis of “de novo” autoimmune hepatitis was proposed, based on the presence of high-titre circulating autoantibodies and liver histology features. Following the introduction of a steroid therapy, clinical and biochemical parameters progressively improved. Hepatitis C virus infection, however, relapsed after a few months in all the patients.ConclusionsFollowing liver transplantation, antiviral therapy with pegylated-interferon α-2a and ribavirin for recurrent hepatitis C may be associated, in a few patients, with severe immune-mediated graft dysfunction similar to autoimmune hepatitis.     

Blood cell, liver function, and response changes by PEG-interferon-α2b plus ribavirin with polaprezinc therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C

Purpose Zinc has been reported to ameliorate hematologic side effects and improve liver function. In addition to its various effects, zinc supplementation in chronic hepatitis C patients with genotype 1b of high viral load enhanced the response to interferon (IFN) monotherapy. This study was aimed at clarifying whether zinc could improve hematologic side effects, improve liver function, and enhance the response to therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with pegylated-interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV). Methods The 32 patients enrolled in the study were randomly divided into two groups: a PEG-IFN-α2b plus RBV with zinc group (PEG/RBV + zinc, n = 16) and a PEG-IFN-α2b plus RBV group (PEG/RBV, n = 16). HCV-RNA, serum zinc, ALT, white blood cell, red blood cell, platelet, and hemoglobin (Hb) levels were examined. Results Serum zinc levels were significantly higher in the PEG/RBV with zinc group than in the PEG/RBV without zinc group at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. No significant differences were observed in the clearance of HCV-RNA between the two groups. The outcome of the treatment was similar; results of laboratory examinations including ALT before, during, and after therapy revealed no significant differences between the two groups at any point in all items except serum zinc levels. A sustained virological response rate was observed in 50.0% in the PEG/RBV with zinc group and 43.8% in the PEG/RBV without zinc group, with no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions The study demonstrated no evidence that zinc ameliorates hematologic side effects, improves liver function, and enhances the response to the therapy in chronic hepatitis C receiving PEG-IFN-α2b plus RBV.     

Natural killer cell receptor and HLA‐C gene polymorphisms among patients with hepatitis C: a comparison between sustained virological responders and non‐responders

Background/Aims: Killer cell immunoglobulin‐like receptors (KIR) are involved in the activation/inhibition of NK cells through an interaction with HLA class I molecules on target cells. Our study aimed to evaluate the association between KIR gene polymorphisms and the response of patients with CHC to antiviral therapy. Methods: We compared the frequency of KIR genes, as well as that of compound KIR/HLA‐C genotypes, between groups of patients with CHC who presented a sustained virological response (n=66) and who were non‐responders to a combination of pegylated or standard interferon and ribavirin (n=101). KIR and HLA‐C genotyping were performed using commercial kits. Results: We detected a greater frequency of the KIR2DL5 gene among non‐responders to antiviral therapy compared with sustained virological responders (68.3 vs. 40.9%) (P<0.001). We used multiple logistic regression analysis to determine the association between therapy response and the presence of KIR2DL5, after a control for potentially confounding variables (genotype, alcohol, fibrosis, gender, age, ethnic background and route of HCV infection). The results confirmed the strong association between the presence of KIR2DL5 and the non‐response to antiviral treatment (P=0.001). Conclusions: Host genetic factors may be associated with a non‐response to antiviral therapy. KIR2DL5 is a candidate gene involved in immunomodulation associated with non‐response to antiviral therapy.     

Combination therapy with interferon-alpha(2b), ribavirin,and amantadine in chronic hepatitis C nonresponders to interferon and ribavirin

Standard therapies for the treatment of hepatitis C are ineffective in almost 50% of patients. Amantadine is an antiviral agent that may have activity against hepatitis C virus. In this pilot study, we evaluated the efficacy of a combination of interferon, ribavirin, and amantadine in patients with chronic hepatitis C who had previously failed 6–12 months of treatment with interferon and ribavirin. In this prospective open-label study, 23 patients were treated with a combination of interferon-_2b 3 million units subcutaneously three times per week, ribavirin 1000–1200 mg daily, and amantadine 100 mg twice daily for 6–12 months. Treatment was discontinued at 6 months if the patients had detectable HCV RNA by PCR. All patients were followed for 6 months after the completion of treatment. At the end of treatment, the biochemical response was 47% and the virological response was 30%. However, the rate of sustained virological response was only 13% (3/23). There were no unexpected side effects with triple therapy. In conclusion, triple therapy with interferon, ribavirin and amantadine resulted in a low sustained viral clearance in chronic hepatitis C patients who had previously failed interferon and ribavirin combination therapy.     

A multicenter survey of re‐treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C in Japan

Aim: This study aimed to clarify the factors associated the efficacy of re‐treatment with pegylated interferon (PEG IFN) plus ribavirin combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C who had failed to respond to previous treatment. Methods: One hundred and forty‐three patients who had previously shown relapse (n = 79), non‐response (n = 34) or intolerance (n = 30) to PEG IFN plus ribavirin were re‐treated with PEG IFN plus ribavirin. Results: Twenty‐five patients with intolerance to previous treatment completed re‐treatment and the sustained virological response (SVR) rates were 55% and 80% for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 and 2, respectively. On re‐treatment of the 113 patients who completed the previous treatment, the SVR rates were 48% and 63% for genotype 1 and 2, respectively. Relapse after previous treatment and a low baseline HCV RNA level on re‐treatment were associated with SVR in genotype 1 (P < 0.001). Patients with the interleukin‐28B major genotype responded significantly better and earlier to re‐treatment, but the difference in the SVR rate did not reach a significant level between the major and minor genotypes (P = 0.09). Extended treatment of 72 weeks raised the SVR rate among the patients who attained complete early virological response but not rapid virological response with re‐treatment (72 weeks, 73%, 16/22, vs 48 weeks, 38%, 5/13, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Relapse after previous treatment and a low baseline HCV RNA level have predictive values for a favorable response of PEG IFN plus ribavirin re‐treatment for HCV genotype 1 patients. Re‐treatment for 72 weeks may lead to clinical improvement for genotype 1 patients with complete early virological response and without rapid virological response on re‐treatment.     

Effects of Combined Antiviral Therapy on Asymptomatic Mixed Cryoglobulinemia in Naive Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection: A Preliminary Study

The clinical spectrum of mixed cryoglobulinemia embraces several manifestations: recurrent vascular purpura, weakness, arthralgia/arthritis, glomerulonephritis, peripheral neuropathies, and Raynaud's phenomenon. Mixed cryoglobulinemia is currently treated with steroids, low–antigen content diet, immunosuppressors, plasma exchange, and antiviral therapy, namely, α -interferon alone or, more recently, in association with ribavirin. In the present research, we verified the effectiveness of combined therapy with interferon and ribavirin on asymptomatic mixed cryoglobulinemia in naïve (never treated before) patients with chronic hepatitis C. We enrolled 50 consecutive patients, 31 males and 19 females, with chronic hepatitis C who showed a sustained response to combined antiviral therapy (interferon and ribavirin). Before treatment, cryoglobulins were detected in 25 subjects (50%). Only 1 of the 25 patients with asymptomatic mixed cryoglobulinemia had persistence of cryoglobulins at the end of the follow-up period. Unexpectedly, in 7 of 25 subjects without mixed cryoglobulinemia before treatment, cryoglobulins became detectable after antiviral therapy. Our present study first reports the onset of asymptomatic mixed cryoglobulinemia in hepatitis C virus patients after clearance of the virus from blood obtained with a combined antiviral treatment. Possible explanations are discussed. Our data also suggest that the appearance of a clinically evident mixed cryoglobulinemia cannot be excluded in this kind of subject.     

High-dose interferon alpha-2b induction therapy in combination with ribavirin for Japanese patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b with a high baseline viral load

Background Although pegylated interferon (IFN) is now used in many countries as a standard therapy for chronic hepatitis C, the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of high-dose interferon alpha-2b induction with ribavirin are not fully evaluated, especially in Japanese patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b with a high viral load.Methods Patients (n = 83) received daily, high-dose induction therapy of interferon alpha-2b (6 million units [MU] once daily for 2 weeks), followed by 6MU three times weekly for 22 weeks. Oral ribavirin (800 or 600mg/day) was given daily for 24 weeks, and then the patients were followed up for 24 weeks.Results Of the 83 patients, 67 (81%) had a biochemical response (BR), and 37 (45%) achieved a sustained BR (SBR). Virologic response (VR; undetectable serum HCV RNA level by polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) was noted in 55 (66%) patients, and sustained VR (SVR) in 16 (19%) patients. Baseline viral load did not influence treatment outcome. There was no significant difference in treatment outcome among treatment-naÏve patients, relapsers, and nonresponders to previous IFN monotherapy. Multivariate analyses identified serum ribavirin concentrations at week 8 of therapy (odds ratio [OR], 23.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.84–61.1; P = 0.015) and negativity for serum HCV RNA at week 8 (OR, 22.5; CI, 1.76–57.5; P = 0.017, respectively) as two significant and independent predictors of SVR.Conclusions The efficacy of 24-week combination therapy of high-dose IFN alpha-2b induction and ribavirin deserves attention in HCV genotype 1b patients with a high viral load, especially in nonresponders to previous IFN monotherapy and patients with a very high viral load.