Randomized controlled trial of a dose consolidation program

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and financial impact of a drug dose consolidation (optimization) program using letter intervention. METHODS: This pilot program in a large, mid-Atlantic health plan utilized a randomized controlled trial research design. A review of adjudicated pharmacy claims records was performed monthly for 3 consecutive months from November 2002 through February 2003 to identify inefficient (i.e., >once-daily) regimens for any one of 68 dosage strengths of 37 single-source maintenance drugs with once-daily dosing recommendations. Prescribers who had prescribed one or more inefficient regimens were identified and randomized to one of the 2 intervention arms or a control arm. Prescribers in both intervention arms were sent personalized letters with information on their patients. inefficient regimens and suggested dose consolidation options. Patients of prescribers in one intervention arm received a complementary, patient-oriented letter. Pharmacy claims for patients in all arms were examined at 180 days after the date of the letter mailing for conversion to an efficient (once-daily) regimen. Financial modeling analysis calculated net savings as changes in pharmacy expenditures minus administrative costs. RESULTS: A total of 2,614 inefficient regimens, representing 6.7% of claims for the targeted medications, were identified. The rate of consolidation to a suggested dosing option was lower for the Physician Letter arm (7.3%) than for the Physician/Member Letter arm (10.2%) (P = 0.046). Both intervention arms had higher consolidation rates than the Control arm (3.9%) (P = 0.018 and P = 0.000, respectively.). Approximately 30% of the regimens in each study arm were never refilled after being targeted. Financial modeling indicated that a dose consolidation intervention could save 0.03 dollars to 0.07 dollars per member per month (PMPM) in 2003 dollars with full medication compliance but only 0.02 dollars to 0.03 dollars PMPM when savings were calculated with realistic, partial compliance rates. Subanalyses performed at the drug therapy class level revealed few opportunities to justify implementing a dose consolidation program. CONCLUSIONS: After taking into consideration program administrative costs, high rates of refill discontinuation, and dose consolidation that occurs naturally without intervention, the results indicated that a letter-based dose consolidation program did not appreciably decrease pharmacy expenditures.     

Therapeutic decision-making: a model for formulary evaluation

A systematic approach of evaluating medications for a hospital formulary is discussed. The hospital formulary is a program of objective evaluation, selection, and use of medicinal agents in the hospital. In light of the ever-increasing numbers of new and/or improved therapeutic agents, formulary decisions must be made with an eye to the future. Therefore, it appears that the best means of choosing a medication for formulary addition, both clinically and economically, is to choose an agent based on its clinical indication(s). Examples of such indications are presented. Selecting formulary agents by indication rather than by simple drug cost or pharmacologic class should ensure the most effective utilization of therapeutic agents and hopefully a diminution of overall costs.     

Pharmacoeconomics and formulary decision making

Pharmacoeconomic assessment of formulary actions has become increasingly common in local, national, and international formulary decision making. Tactics for managing medication use include formulary management and drug policies. Pharmacoeconomic data can provide support for these formulary decisions. For example, pharmacoeconomic data can support the inclusion or exclusion of a drug on or from the formulary and support practice guidelines that promote the most cost-effective or appropriate utilisation of pharmaceutical products. Various strategies can be used to incorporate pharmacoeconomics into formulary decision making. These include using published pharmacoeconomic studies and economic modelling techniques, and conducting local pharmacoeconomic research. Criteria for evaluating the pharmacoeconomic literature, suggestions for employing economic models, and suggested guidelines for conducting pharmacoeconomic projects are discussed. Although most formularies are viewed as cost-containment tools, formularies should not be a list of the 'cheapest' alternatives. Today's formulary should contain agents that optimise therapeutic outcomes while controlling cost. Pharmacoeconomic assessments of formulary decisions help to ensure that the agents promoted by our formularies yield the highest outcome per dollar spent. A discussion of the process for formulary action in a US hospital, the influence of pharmacoeconomics on US formularies, and strategies for incorporating pharmacoeconomics into formulary decision making are presented in this paper.     

Detection of medication nonadherence through review of pharmacy claims data.

The utility of pharmacy claims data in detecting improper medication use, medication changes, and formulary adherence was assessed. Pharmacists provided six months of pharmacy claims data to primary care physicians for patients on the day of their scheduled clinic appointments. Similar data, not supplied to physicians, were generated for a matched population of patients on the day of their scheduled clinic appointments. A blinded pharmacist abstracter reviewed dictated office notes for both control and treatment groups. Medication adherence and medication changes were assessed by the abstracter as well as the difference in total medication costs for each of the groups before and after the pharmacy claims data were supplied. Surveys were distributed to physicians to determine whether pharmaceutical care was improved by the pharmacy claims data. In the treatment group, physicians detected medication nonadherence in 30.5% of their patients, while the abstracter noted nonadherence in 58.1% of patients. Physicians failed to detect any nonadherence in the control group, but the abstractor detected nonadherence in 57.1% of these patients. Changes in medication regimens occurred more often in the treatment group (p < 0.001). The mean percentage of patients switched to formulary agents significantly differed between the treatment and control groups (27.7% versus 0.0%, respectively) (p < 0.001). There were no differences in median drug costs for either group before or after the pharmacy claims data were provided. Provision of pharmacy claims data to physicians helped them detect medication nonadherence, evaluate therapeutic duplication or omissions, increase formulary use, and reduce the time required to obtain an accurate medication history.     

Eliminating the printed formulary: a cost-effective alternative

This article discusses the use of an in-house computer system to replace a printed formulary listing, parenteral guidelines, notification of cytotoxic or hazardous drugs, and a listing of formulary equivalents. Advantages of the system include availability of current information for physicians and nurses and cost savings for the hospital.     

国外医院处方集新药的遴选过程与标准介绍

目的:调查国内外处方集新药的遴选过程及影响因素。方法:通过阅读国内外文献对所报道的药事管理与药物治疗学委员会的组成和职能以及处方集新药的遴选过程和影响因素等内容进行分析。结果:处方集新药的遴选主要由药事管理与药物治疗学委员会负责组织进行,药师负责对申请新药进行评估并交由药事会讨论。药品的有效性和安全性是首要考虑因素,经济学因素和操作性方面的因素次之。结论:新药上会前的药品评估过程是药品遴选的关键环节,药品的安全性和有效性是影响药品能否过会的关键因素。     

The effect on medication errors of pharmacists charting medication in an emergency department

Objective To determine the frequency and clinical significance of medication errors when (a) pharmacists elicit medication histories in the Emergency Department after medications have been prescribed by doctors and (b) pharmacists obtain and chart medication histories prior to doctors’ approval. Setting The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, a 350 bed South Australian teaching hospital, serving the local adult community. Method Emergency Department patients at risk of medication misadventure were recruited in two phases with a ‘usual practice’ arm (6 weeks) and a ‘pharmacist medication charting’ arm (5 weeks) reflecting an alternative intervention. In the ‘usual care’ arm, medication histories were compiled by a pharmacy researcher after a doctor had completed the medication chart. The researcher-elicited medication histories were compared with the doctors’ medication charts and unintentional discrepancies were recorded. In the ‘pharmacist medication charting’ arm, the same process was followed except the researcher compiled the patients’ medication histories at triage, prior to patients seeing a doctor. The medication history was then transcribed onto a medication chart for authorisation by a doctor. In addition, whether resolution of unintentional discrepancies for patients in the ‘usual care’ arm had occurred by discharge was determined by examining patients’ medical records. Main outcome measure Frequency of unintentional discrepancies and medication errors. Results The study included 45 and 29 patients in the ‘usual care’ and intervention arms, respectively. In the ‘usual care’ arm, 75.6% of patients had one or more unintentional discrepancies compared with 3.3% in the ‘pharmacist medication charting’ arm. This resulted in an average of 2.35 missed doses per patient in the ‘usual care’ arm and 0.24 in the intervention arm. In addition, an average of 1.04 incorrect doses per patient were administered in the ‘usual care’ arm and none in the ‘pharmacist medication charting’ arm. The differences observed between the arms were statistically significant (P < 0.05) and deemed clinically significant by a multidisciplinary panel. Conclusion This study provides evidence for pharmacists eliciting medication histories to prepare medication charts at the earliest possible opportunity following a patient’s presentation to the Emergency Department     

《医院处方集》的编写及其临床应用意义

目的：总结本院《医院处方集》的编写思路和过程,阐述《医院处方集》在本院临床指导的意义。方法：回顾《医院处方集》的编写过程,进行总结分析。结果与结论：《医院处方集》分为总论、各论、附录、索引4个部分,具有妇产科用药的专业性、代表性和指导性。《医院处方集》在指导本院临床用药规范化上起到了积极的作用,同时可提高本院的诊疗水平,保障本院用药安全。     

Pharmacoeconomic series: Part 3. Applying pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life measures to the formulary management process

P & T Committees were established as an institution's primary organizational tool for the development and maintenance of the formulary. Traditionally, P & T Committees have focused on the safety, efficacy, and acquisition cost of medications to be considered for formulary approval. Today, the impact of pharmaceuticals on patients' quality-of-life and total health care expenditures are increasingly important considerations to be weighed by P & T Committees. Pharmacoeconomic analyses and quality-of-life outcomes represent valuable contributions to the formulary decision-making and management process.     

The use of pharmacoeconomic evidence to support formulary decision making in Saudi Arabia: Methodological recommendations

In pharmacoeconomics the costs and consequences of alternative medications are compared. Many countries have begun to use pharmacoeconomic evidence to support decisions on licensing, pricing, reimbursement, or addition to the formulary. In Saudi Arabia, it is not mandatory to submit cost effectiveness evidence to support licensing or addition to the formulary decisions however, data will be considered if submitted. Previous evidence suggests that the use of pharmacoeconomic evidence by Saudi Pharmacy and Therapeutic (P&T) committee members in formulary decisions making process is limited mainly because of lack of expertise and lack of resources. This paper intended to provide Saudi P&T decision makers with a clear set of best practice methodological recommendations to help in increasing the utilisation of pharmacoeconomic evidence in the formulary decisions making process.     

Building a better online formulary.

The history of and improvements made to the University of Michigan Health System (UMHS) inpatient online formulary are described. The current formulary at UMHS is the third version of the Web-based formulary. The original effort in 1997 consisted of converting word-processing documents to HTML format and exporting this information to the university's intranet. There was no mechanism to search for formulary items, no therapeutic class cross-referencing, and no cost information. Documents and their conversion had to be manually maintained. The second version incorporated a series of automatic daily computer downloads from the inpatient pharmacy computer system. Web pages were built to dynamically display the formulary information from the database based on users' requests. The formulary enabled searching by brand or generic names, provided therapeutic category cross-references, listed the location of products within automated dispensing cabinets, provided accurate cost information, and was always up-to-date. Maintenance efforts drastically decreased. The current version has incorporated additional logic to meet users' needs. If no matches are found, the system expands its search by automatically linking to UMHS's inpatient pharmacy system repository of all drugs, finding matches to what the user entered, and then returning the names of therapeutically similar formulary agents to the user. A cross-index feature allows the system to return all the drugs that fall under the searched therapeutic category. Dramatic improvements have been made to UMHS's inpatient online formulary in the past two years. The current formulary provides a very low-cost, easily maintainable, and effective means to access the formulary and clinically relevant and timely information specific to each medication.     

Antipsychotics: how strict the formulary?

Seventeen antipsychotic medications are available in the U.S. Antipsychotic formulary considerations include relative efficacy, individual patient response, relative differences in adverse effects, dosage form availability, blood level monitoring, and generic availability. Chlorpromazine, thioridazine, haloperidol, and fluphenazine are recommended for formulary inclusion based on research and clinical considerations. A recommendation for managing a patient receiving a nonformulary antipsychotic is presented.     

Student-Led discharge counseling program for High-Risk medications in a teaching hospital in Saudi Arabia: A pilot study

Discharge counseling by pharmacists reduces adverse medication events, emergency department visits, and readmissions. Studies indicate that pharmacy students in advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPE) can deliver effective medication-related activities. An open label randomized controlled trial was conducted in adults discharged on warfarin, insulin, or both. Pharmacy students performed medication reconciliation, structured medication counseling, and follow-up calls 72-hours post-discharge. The usual care arm received traditional education. The primary outcome was the 30-day readmission rate post-discharge. Ninety-eight patients on high-risk medications were randomized to intervention (n = 51) or usual care (n = 47). The 30-day hospital readmission rate was lower in the intervention group (8/51, 15% vs. 11/47, 23%); (p = 0.48). There was no statistical difference in the time to first unplanned health care use (hazard ratio = 0.49 (95 %CI, 0.19–1.24), or the time-to-first clinic visit post-discharge (p = 0.94) between the two arms. Students identified 26 drug-related problems during reconciliation. Patients in the intervention arm reported high satisfaction with the service (mean 3.94; SD 0.11). Involving APPE students in the transition of care activities presents an excellent opportunity to minimize pharmacists' workload while maintaining patient care services.     

Strengthening the formulary system by implementing a drug usage guidelines program

The development and implementation of a Drug Usage Guidelines (DUG) program in a 1,200-bed, federal teaching hospital are described. The program was designed to promote effective formulary control through established procedures for the review and evaluation of drugs submitted to the Pharmacy and Therapeutics (P & T) Committee for addition to the formulary. The procedures required the submission of the DUG and an oral presentation to the Committee prior to any final vote on the request. Anticipated potential benefits of the DUG program are to: (1) stimulate rational drug therapy, (2) provide reliable drug information to the professional staff in a usable format, (3) promote a thorough evaluation of therapeutic agents before approving for formulary inclusion, and (4) provide physician-generated guidelines for use as criteria in drug utilization review audits.