Scarce influence of corticosteroid boluses on long-term viral load and liver histology in transplanted patients with recurrent hepatitis C

Corticosteroid boluses, which are the treatment for acute rejection episodes, have been shown to produce transient increases in viremia. However, their effect on long-term viral load, histological activity index (HAI), and fibrosis has not been well established. The aim of our study was to compare late viral load, HAI, and fibrosis in patients with versus without steroid boluses in the immediate posttransplant period. We analyzed patients transplanted due to hepatitis C virus. Inclusion criteria were: no change in immunosuppression (cyclosporine or tacrolimus with/without mycophenolate); no steroids in the previous 4 months; no antiviral treatment; liver biopsy and viral load determination >12 months after transplantation. Exclusion criteria were HIV, hepatitis B, and active cytomegalovirus infection. Nonparametric tests were used to compare viral load, HAI, and fibrosis (Ishak-score) among patients who received steroid boluses for an acute rejection episode (group 1) versus those who did not (group 2). Among the 48 selected patients were 38 men with the overall mean age of the entire group of 55.6 +/- 10.9 years. The mean period from liver transplantation was 53.25 +/- 33.4 months. Thirty-four (70.1%) were treated with tacrolimus and the rest, cyclosporine. Eleven (22.9%) had and 37 (77.1%) had not received corticosteroid boluses. The viral load was similar in groups 1 and 2 (5.74 +/- 0.54 vs 5.98 +/- 0.53 Log(10) IU per mL, P = .32). Fibrosis was also similar (2.5 +/- 1.6 vs 2.2 +/- 1.7, P = .56). However, HAI was higher in group 1 (7.5 +/- 1.7 vs 6.0 +/- 1.7, P = .026). In conclusion, although long-term viral load was similar in patients who had versus had not received one cycle of steroid boluses, the HAI was significantly higher in the former cohort, but had not resulted in greater fibrosis during the study follow-up.     

Results of a two-center study comparing hepatic fibrosis progression in HCV-positive liver transplant patients receiving cyclosporine or tacrolimus

A 2-center retrospective analysis was performed in 60 patients undergoing liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related disease (cyclosporine in 20, tacrolimus in 40). Mean (±SEM) follow-up was 23.6 ± 22.5 and 22.3 ± 13.7 months in patients receiving cyclosporine or tacrolimus, respectively. Clinically indicated biopsies were performed in 15/20 cyclosporine patients (75%) and 22/40 tacrolimus patients (55%; P = .17). The Ishak fibrosis score was significantly lower in cyclosporine-treated patients versus tacrolimus-treated patients (mean 1.7 ± 0.4 vs 3.1 ± 0.4; P = .023), as was percentage of fibrosis grade Ishak ≥4 (7% vs 41%; P = .028). The mean time to moderate fibrosis (Ishak score ≥3) was 38.2 ± 15.1 months in cyclosporine patients (4/15) and 23.5 ± 12.6 months in tacrolimus patients (14/22); the difference was not statistically significant (P = .09). This retrospective study suggests that cyclosporine-based immunosuppression is associated with less severe hepatic fibrosis in HCV-positive liver transplant recipients compared with tacrolimus-based regimens, but a larger prospective comparative trial is necessary to confirm these findings.     

Long-term outcomes in liver transplant patients with hepatic C infection receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporine

Choice of calcineurin inhibitor may be a contributing factor to deteriorating patient and graft survival following liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV). In our multicenter, open-label LIS2T study, de novo liver transplant patients stratified by HCV status were randomized to cyclosporine or tacrolimus. Follow-up data were obtained in an observational study of 95 patients. Mean follow-up was 34 and 37 months, respectively, for cyclosporine-treated (n = 47) and tacrolimus-treated (n = 48) patients. In patients not receiving antiviral therapy, 22 of 31 given cyclosporine (72%) and 24 of 29 given tacrolimus (83%) had biochemical recurrence of HCV. In 68 patients with at least one biopsy, histological evidence of HCV-related hepatitis was present in 27 of 31 (87%) cyclosporine-treated patients and 37 of 37 (100%) tacrolimus-treated patients (P = .02, chi-square test). Three-year actuarial risk of fibrosis stage 2 was 66% with cyclosporine and 90% with tacrolimus; for fibrosis stage 3 or 4 it was 46% and 80%, respectively. Three graft losses were attributed to HCV recurrence in cyclosporine-treated patients and six in tacrolimus-treated patients. Tacrolimus may be associated with increased risk of histological HCV disease recurrence compared to cyclosporine.     

Serum cholesterol changes in long-term survivors of liver transplantation: a comparison between cyclosporine and tacrolimus therapy.

The aim of this study was to compare the long-term effect of tacrolimus and cyclosporine therapies on serum cholesterol levels in liver transplant recipients. We retrospectively studied 127 consecutive adult liver transplant recipients who survived for at least 1 year after transplantation. Basal immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine plus prednisone in 100 patients and tacrolimus plus prednisone in 27 patients. Hypercholesterolemia was defined as a fasting serum cholesterol level greater than 220 mg/dL. Mean follow-up was 39 months. No statistical significance was found between cyclosporine- and tacrolimus-treated patients regarding age, sex, diagnosis, and previous cholesterol levels; both groups were similar. Significantly more tacrolimus-treated patients were steroid free in the first and second year of follow-up (tacrolimus, 37% and 63%; cyclosporine, 13% and 32%, respectively; P <.01). In the third year of follow-up, this difference was not significant (77% v 56%). The overall incidence of hypercholesterolemia was 34.6% (44 patients). At the end of the study, hypercholesterolemia was found in 24 of 51 and 14 of 70 patients with and without steroids, respectively (P <.002). Also, mean cholesterol levels were 224 +/- 70 and 191 +/- 48 mg/dL before and after steroid withdrawal, respectively, P <.001. Hypercholesterolemia was found in 43.7% of the patients during cyclosporine plus prednisone therapy compared with 46.1% of the patients during tacrolimus plus prednisone therapy (P <.9). Greater mean cholesterol levels were found in the cyclosporine group, particularly in the second and third years of follow-up (P <.01). Hypercholesterolemia was found in 22% of the patients during cyclosporine monotherapy compared with 15% during tacrolimus monotherapy (P <.5). No differences were found in mean cholesterol levels during follow-up when both monotherapy groups were compared. In conclusion, a lower incidence of hypercholesterolemia was achieved in tacrolimus-treated patients, mainly when steroids were still part of the immunosuppressive treatment.     

Effect of calcineurin inhibitors on survival and histologic disease severity in HCV-infected liver transplant recipients.

The severity of recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) is likely related to several factors. Controversial results have been reported regarding the effect of specific calcineurin-inhibitors. The aim of this research was to determine whether there are differences on posttransplantation outcome in HCV-infected patients based on initial immunosuppression. Prospective randomized trial comparing tacrolimus vs. cyclosporine-based immunosuppression in a cohort of patients undergoing primary orthotopic liver transplantation between 2001 and 2003 was used. Yearly biopsies were performed. Patients with at least 1 protocol biopsy and those with very severe recurrence despite a follow-up of less than 1 yr (cholestatic hepatitis, progression to bridging fibrosis/cirrhosis) were included. Baseline characteristics (demographics, liver function at transplantation, genotype distribution, donor, surgery, immunosuppression except for the type of calcineurin inhibitor) did not differ between the 2 groups. Severe disease (defined as bridging fibrosis, cirrhosis, cholestatic hepatitis, and/or death due to recurrent disease in the first year) was present in 27 in 90 (30%), and was equally distributed in the cyclosporine and tacrolimus groups (15/46 vs. 12/44, respectively). A total of 33 in 90 (37%) patients had no fibrosis in the first year biopsy with no difference between the cyclosporine and tacrolimus groups (36.5 vs. 37%). The percentage of patients developing recurrent acute hepatitis was also similar (32% vs 35%); time to acute hepatitis though was shorter in the tacrolimus group (59 days [35-185] vs. 92 days [39-343] in the cyclosporin group; P = 0.02). Cholestatic hepatitis was observed in 4 of 44 and 5 of 46 patients under cyclosporine and tacrolimus, respectively (P = not significant). In conclusions, the short-term posttransplantation course of hepatitis C is not related to the calcineurin inhibitor used.     

Improved liver function and decreased hepatitis C viral load after tacrolimus was replaced by cyclosporine

Potential antiviral properties of cyclosporine against hepatitis C virus have been highlighted in several publications. Therefore, we investigated the effect of a switch from tacrolimus to cyclosporine in a liver transplant recipient with recurrent hepatitis C who did not respond to antiviral therapy. The patient received a liver transplant for hepatitis C cirrhosis. Initial immunosuppressive treatment was based on tacrolimus. Because of viral activity, a combined therapy was initiated 20 months later including interferon and ribavirine. Then, due to a lack of virological and biochemical response, tacrolimus was replaced by cyclosporine (Neoral), while maintaining the same antiviral therapy. Decreases in the viral load and transaminases levels were observed.     

The role of different immunosuppression in the long-term histological outcome of HCV reinfection after liver transplantation for HCV cirrhosis

BACKGROUND: The effect of the type of immunosuppression on the course of posttransplant hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the histological outcome of posttransplant HCV infection with respect to initial immunosuppressive therapy in a cohort of 59 of 65 HCV positive transplant patients who survived at least 12 months. METHODS: Initial immunosuppressive therapy was triple (cyclosporine or tacrolimus and azathioprine and prednisolone) in 41, double (cyclosporine and prednisolone) in 5, and single (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) in 13 patients. There was blinded histological evaluation, based on necroinflammatory activity (grading score:0-18) and fibrosis (staging score: 0-6). The median histological follow-up was 36 (12-72) months. RESULTS: In the last liver biopsy, high necroinflammatory activity indicating chronic hepatitis (grading score > or =4) was found in 42 (71%) and severe fibrosis or cirrhosis (staging score > or =4) in 18 (30.5%) patients. High necroinflammatory activity was associated significantly with absence of pretransplant alcohol abuse (P=0.01) and relatively with occurrence of posttransplant acute lobular hepatitis C (P=0.055). Development of severe fibrosis or cirrhosis was significantly associated only with the type of initial immunosuppressive therapy. In particular, severe fibrosis or cirrhosis developed significantly more frequently in patients treated with triple or double (17/46 or 37%) than with single initial immunosuppressive therapy (1/13 or 7.7%) (adjusted for biopsy time: P=0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Severe fibrosis or cirrhosis appears to develop in 30% of HCV transplant patients in a median of 3 years and to be associated with heavier initial immunosuppression.     

Influence of cyclosporine and tacrolimus on serum uric acid levels in stable kidney transplant recipients

Although hyperuricemia is a well-known adverse effect of cyclosporine (CsA) treatment, there are contradictory data regarding the effect of tacrolimus on uric acid levels. The aim of this study was to examine the influences of CsA and tacrolimus-based treatment regimens on serum uric acid levels in 155 renal transplant recipients with normal allograft function who underwent renal transplantation between 1999 and 2002. Serum uric acid levels were recorded at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months follow-up. The patients were treated with CsA-based (n = 73), tacrolimus-based (n = 47), or conversion from CsA-based to tacrolimus-based (n = 35) immunosuppressive regimens. Serum uric acid levels for patients in the CsA and tacrolimus groups were 6.3 +/- 1.6 versus 7.9 +/- 1.9 mg/dL and 6.5 +/- 1.8 versus 8.0 +/- 1.8 mg/dL at the study outset and 24 months, respectively. Both of the treatment regimens showed progressively increasing serum uric acid levels (P < .001). Serum uric acid levels of patients with treatment conversion from CsA to tacrolimus were 8.6 +/- 2.8 mg/dL before conversion and 8.1 +/- 1.9 mg/dL after conversion. There was no alteration in serum uric acid levels after the change of treatment (P > .05). These findings indicate that, compared with CsA, tacrolimus offers no advantage for serum uric acid levels in renal transplant recipients.     

Evolution of cardiovascular risk after liver transplantation: A comparison of cyclosporine A and tacrolimus (FK506)

The development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular complications is a common and serious problem for the long-term survivors of organ transplantation. Cyclosporine A plus steroid-based immunosuppression regimens in these patients are associated with the development of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, and diabetes mellitus. Whether the new immunosuppressive agent tacrolimus (FK506) confers any advantage in terms of these cardiovascular risk factors has been less well studied. We compared serial changes in blood pressure, lipids, body weight, and glucose levels during the first 12 months after liver transplantation in patients using either cyclosporine A (n = 39) or tacrolimus (n = 24)-based immunosuppression. By 12 months, the prevalence of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and obesity was increased in the cyclosporine A group compared to tacrolimus: 82% versus 33%, 33% versus 0%, and 46% versus 29%, respectively (all p < .05). Triglyceride and total cholesterol levels were 196 +/- 23 versus 125 +/- 13 mg/dL and 225 +/- 9 versus 159 +/- 7 mg/dL for the cyclosporine A versus tacrolimus groups, respectively (p < .05). Cumulative posttransplant steroid dose was not related to the observed lipid changes in either group, although the increase in triglycerides was positively correlated to weight gain and diuretic use in the cyclosporine A group. The incidence of diabetes mellitus was not increased from baseline in either group. These results indicate that tacrolimus, compared to cyclosporine A, is associated with a less adverse cardiovascular risk profile in the first year after liver transplantation. Whether these differences persist and become clinically relevant to a liver transplant recipient population that is increasingly older and has more preexisting cardiovascular disease remains to be determined. (Liver Transpl Surg 1997 Jan;3(1):1-9)     

Retrospective analysis of the impact of immunosuppression on the course of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION: In a substantial proportion of patients, recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation (OLT) rapidly progresses to graft cirrhosis. The role of different immunosuppressive schemes is not well evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The clinical course of 130 patients with recurrent hepatitis C after OLT was retrospectively analyzed. Mean trough levels of calcineurin inhibitors and cumulative doses of the remaining immunosuppressants were calculated. The results were compared with liver function tests, histological fibrosis progression, and survival. RESULTS: Survival and fibrosis progression were similar in patients with tacrolimus and cyclosporine and did not correlate with mean trough levels. In contrast, the application of azathioprine (mean dose of more than 25 mg/d during the first 3 months after OLT) was associated with significantly less progression of fibrosis (P = .01). Administration of azathioprine after the early postoperative phase was not related to the long-term outcome. The dose of prednisolone in the long-term course after OLT significantly correlated with the rate of fibrosis progression (P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical course of recurrent hepatitis C was variable. Survival and fibrosis progression did not correlate with the type or trough level of calcineurin inhibitors. Azathioprine early in the course after OLT and prolonged administration of prednisolone were associated with less fibrosis progression.     

Cyclosporine A versus tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids as primary immunosuppression after lung transplantation: one-year results of a 2-center prospective randomized trial

OBJECTIVES: Cyclosporine (INN: ciclosporin) A or tacrolimus have been used mostly in combination with azathioprine as primary immunosuppression after lung transplantation. Benefit or risk deriving from the combination with mycophenolate mofetil are yet unknown. METHODS: In a prospective, 2-center, open randomized trial, the combination of cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids was compared with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids as primary therapy after primary lung transplantation. All patients underwent induction therapy with rabbit antithymocyte globulin for 3 days. The 2 groups were compared with regard to patient survival, freedom from acute rejection, bronchiolitis obliterans, infectious episodes, and side effects. RESULTS: Between September 1997 and April 1999, 74 lung transplant recipients were randomized to receive either cyclosporine A (n = 37) or tacrolimus (n = 37). Groups were comparable with regard to age, sex, transplant procedure, and cytomegalovirus match. Mean follow-up was 507 +/- 258 and 508 +/- 248 days, respectively. Six- and 12-month survival was similar in both groups (89% vs 84% and 82% vs 71%, respectively; P =.748 at 12 months). Two patients from the cyclosporine A group were retransplanted. Freedom from acute rejection at 6 and 12 months was comparable between groups (46% vs 51% and 35% vs 46%, respectively; P =.774 at 12 months). The mean number of treated acute rejection episodes per 100 patient-days was higher in the cyclosporine A than in the tacrolimus group, but the difference was not statistically significant (0.32 +/- 0.42 vs 0.22 +/- 0.30, respectively; P =.097). Four patients from the cyclosporine A group had to be switched to tacrolimus to control ongoing rejection, whereas no patient from the tacrolimus group had to be switched to cyclosporine A. There was a trend toward more infections (0.7 +/- 0.36 vs 0.55 +/- 0.31, P =.059) in the cyclosporine A group. New-onset diabetes mellitus was observed in the tacrolimus group only (11% vs 0%, P =.151), whereas there was a higher incidence of hypertension (60% vs 11%, P =.03) in the cyclosporine A group. CONCLUSION: This 2-center, prospective randomized study showed high immunosuppressive potency of both cyclosporine A and tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil. No significant difference in incidence of acute rejection was observed between the 2 groups. Moreover, survival and incidence of infection were similar. Incidence of drug-related adverse events were similar, yet their spectrum was different.     

12-month follow-up analysis of a multicenter, randomized, prospective trial in de novo liver transplant recipients (LIS2T) comparing cyclosporine microemulsion (C2 monitoring) and tacrolimus.

The LIS2T study was an open-label, multicenter study in which recipients of a primary liver transplant were randomized to cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-ME) (Neoral) (n = 250) (monitoring of blood concentration at 2 hours postdose) C2 or tacrolimus (n = 245) (monitoring of trough drug blood level [predose]) C0 to compare efficacy and safety at 3 and 6 months and to evaluate patient status at 12 months. All patients received steroids with or without azathioprine. At 12 months, 85% of CsA-ME patients and 86% of tacrolimus patients survived with a functioning graft (P not significant). Efficacy was similar in deceased- and living-donor recipients. Significantly fewer hepatitis C-positive patients died or lost their graft by 12 months with CsA-ME (5/88, 6%) than with tacrolimus (14/85, 16%) (P < 0.03). Recurrence of hepatitis C virus in liver grafts was similar in each group. Based on biopsies driven by clinical events, the mean time to histological diagnosis of hepatitis C virus recurrence was significantly longer with CsA-ME (100 +/- 50 days) than with tacrolimus (70 +/- 40 days) (P < 0.05). Median serum creatinine at 12 months was 106 mumol/L with CsA-ME and with tacrolimus. More patients who were nondiabetic at baseline received antihyperglycemic therapy in the tacrolimus group at 12 months (13% vs. 5%, P < 0.01). Of patients who were diabetic at baseline, more tacrolimus-treated individuals required anti-diabetic treatment at 12 months (70% vs. 49%, P = 0.02). Treatment for de novo or preexisting hypertension or hyperlipidemia was similar in both groups. In conclusion, the efficacy of CsA-ME monitored by blood concentration at 2 hours postdose and tacrolimus in liver transplant patients is equivalent to 12 months, and renal function is similar. More patients required antidiabetic therapy with tacrolimus regardless of diabetic status at baseline.     

Relationship between postoperative erythromycin breath test and early morbidity in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Interindividual variability in dosage requirements of the calcineurin inhibitor immunosuppressive agents cyclosporine and tacrolimus after liver transplantation may result from differences in the CYP3A activity of the liver graft. Early postoperative erythromycin breath test (ERMBT) is an in vivo measure of graft CYP3A activity. This study evaluates the usefulness of an early postoperative ERMBT in predicting early morbidity in liver transplant recipients. METHODS: In 26 liver transplant recipients, ERMBT was performed within 2 hr after transplantation. Main end points were the occurrence of cyclosporine and tacrolimus nephrotoxicity, episodes of early graft rejection, early graft function, and graft survival. RESULTS: Cyclosporine and tacrolimus nephrotoxicity were associated with low postoperative ERMBT values (mean 0.63%+/-0.25% 14C/hr vs. 1.35%+/-0.84% 14C/hr, P=0.02). No significant association between early graft rejection and ERMBT values was demonstrated. There was a significant inverse correlation between postoperative ERMBT values and the time to normalization of international normalized ratio as a measure of early graft function (r=-0.78, P<0.001). Graft loss was associated with low postoperative ERMBT values (0.21%+/-0.15% 14C/hr vs. 1.09%+/-0.72% 14C/hr, P=0.002). CONCLUSION: An early postoperative ERMBT may be useful in predicting the development of cyclosporine and tacrolimus nephrotoxicity, severe graft dysfunction, or even graft loss in liver transplant recipients when calcineurin inhibitors are administered according to protocols. Whether ERMBT results may be used to individualize dosage of calcineurin inhibitors needs to be explored.     

Relationship between immunosuppression and osteoporosis in an outpatient liver transplant clinic

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between immunosuppression, disease state, and osteoporosis in an outpatient liver transplant clinic. METHODS: All liver transplant recipients visiting an outpatient transplant clinic received bone density scanning with a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) device of the calcaneal bone after completing a questionnaire assessing risk and medications currently being used. RESULTS: Of the 137 liver transplant (OLT) recipients completing questionnaires and receiving DEXA screening, patients with low bone density (n = 50) were older (56.6 +/- 12.7 years vs 50.2 +/- 10.1 years; P = .02) compared with normal density patients (n = 87) and were predominately female (64.0% vs 35.6%; P = .01). Based on disease state, patients with cholestatic liver failure had lower bone calcaneal area (17.3 +/- 1.3 cm2 vs 18.9 +/- 1.57 cm2; P < .01). Patients taking tacrolimus (n = 112), as compared with cyclosporine (n = 25), had a tendency toward fewer findings of low bone density (37.5% [42 of 112] vs 56.0% [14 of 25]; P = .08) but had more risk factors (3.1 +/- 1.2 vs 2.1 +/- 0.8; P = .001) and a higher prednisone dose (4.4 +/- 5.9 mg/d vs 2.1 +/- 3.8 mg/d; P = .026). For patients weaned from prednisone, the tacrolimus patients were less likely to have low bone density (36.2% vs 68.8%; P = .02). Mycophenolate mofetil did not influence bone density or area measured. CONCLUSIONS: After liver transplantation, patients taking cyclosporine were more likely to have low bone density compared with those taking tacrolimus.     

Comparative allograft histology after liver transplantation for cryptogenic cirrhosis, alcohol, hepatitis C, and cholestatic liver diseases

BACKGROUND: End-stage liver disease for which no cause can be identified, cryptogenic cirrhosis, is a common indication for liver transplantation. Allograft inflammation and fibrosis have been reported to recur with similar frequencies after liver transplantation for cryptogenic cirrhosis and hepatitis C (HCV). METHODS: We determined sequential posttransplant allograft histology in four groups of recipients: 31 transplanted for cryptogenic cirrhosis, 70 for cholestatic etiologies, 40 for alcoholic liver disease, and 56 for HCV. Modified hepatitis activity index (HAI) and fibrosis stage were determined at 4 months, 1 year, and at most recent biopsy posttransplantation. RESULTS: The prevalence of HAI > or = 2 among cryptogenic recipients was similar to that of cholestatic and alcoholic recipients at 4 months, 1 year, and at most recent evaluation (mean 45+/-17 months posttransplantation). For HCV-infected recipients, the frequency of HAI > or = 2 was more than for cryptogenic recipients at 1 year (52 vs. 29%, P=0.04) and at most recent evaluation (64 vs. 15%, P=0.003). Fibrosis scores for cryptogenic, cholestatic, and alcoholic recipients were similar at all timepoints. The proportion of HCV-infected recipients with fibrosis stage >2 was more than that of cryptogenic recipients at 4 months (29 vs. 12%, P=0.05), 1 years (46 vs. 7%, P=0.0002), and at most recent evaluation (42 vs. 15%, P=0.06). None of the cryptogenic recipients developed cirrhosis. RESULTS: The frequency of elevated HAI and fibrosis stage in recipients who undergo transplantation for cryptogenic cirrhosis is similar to that of recipients who undergo transplantation for cholestatic etiologies and significantly less than that of HCV-infected recipients. Fibrosis stage and HAI are generally stable after transplantation for cryptogenic cirrhosis. These data do not suggest a viral etiology of liver disease in the majority of patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis.     

Combination of interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin in liver transplant recipients with histological recurrent hepatitis C

Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is an important cause of fibrosis and cirrhosis after liver transplantation (LT), with histological recurrence developing in at least 50% of patients within the first year. The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin in treating histological recurrent HCV after LT. Since 1998, patients with HCV with significant histological recurrence (fibrosis ≥ 3 and/or histological activity index ≥ 5) or progressive cholestatic disease after LT were treated with interferon alfa-2b (3 million units subcutaneously three times weekly) plus ribavirin (800 to 1,000 mg/d) for 12 months. Immunosuppression was tapered to cyclosporine/FK506 monotherapy. HCV RNA was assessed at entry, week 24, end of treatment, and 6 months after therapy. The primary end point was loss of HCV RNA 6 months after therapy, whereas the secondary end point was histological response. Fifty-four patients met criteria for treatment and have completed follow-up. Patients were mainly men (71% men; mean age, 51 ± 5 years) with genotype 1 infection (88%) and high viral load (mean HCV RNA, 38 ± 9 mEq/mL). Dose modification was required in 72% of patients because of cytopenia or side effects. Intent-to-treat analysis showed that serum HCV RNA was undetectable in 19 patients (35%) week 24, 21 patients (38%) week 48, and 16 patients (30%) at the 6-month follow-up. Paired liver biopsy results (before and within 6 months after treatment) were available for 35 patients. Patients who achieved viral eradication had no significant progression of fibrosis after 1 year of therapy. In summary, combination therapy is a reasonable antiviral option for recurrent HCV infection for established post-LT hepatitis and appears to prevent histological progression of disease if viral eradication is successful. (Liver Transpl 2002;8:1000-1006.)     

Improved cardiovascular risk profile and renal function in renal transplant patients after randomized conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus

Cyclosporine is considered to contribute to the high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients after renal transplantation. Tacrolimus may be more favorable in this respect, but controlled data are scarce. In this prospective randomized study in 124 stable renal transplant patients, the effects of conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus on cardiovascular risk factors and renal function were investigated. Follow-up was 6 mo. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA for repeated measurements. The serum creatinine level decreased from 137 +/- 30 micromol/L to 131 +/- 29 micromol/L (P < 0.01). Three months after conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus, mean BP significantly decreased from 104 +/- 13 to 99 +/- 12 mmHg (P < 0.001). Serum LDL cholesterol decreased from 3.48 +/- 0.80 to 3.11 +/- 0.74 mmol/L (P < 0.001,) and serum apolipoprotein B decreased from 1018 +/- 189 to 935 +/- 174 mg/L (P < 0.001). Serum triglycerides decreased from 2.11 +/- 1.12 to 1.72 +/- 0.94 mmol/L (P < 0.001). In addition, both rate and extent of LDL oxidation were reduced. The fibrinogen level decreased from 3638 +/- 857 to 3417 +/- 751 mg/L (P < 0.05). Plasma homocysteine concentration did not change. Three months after conversion, plasma fasting glucose level temporarily increased from 5.4 +/- 1.3 mmol/L to 5.8 +/- 1.9 mmol/L (P < 0.05). Conversion to tacrolimus resulted in a significant reduction of the Framingham risk score. In conclusion, conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in stable renal transplant patients has a beneficial effect on renal function, BP, serum concentration and atherogenic properties of serum lipids, and fibrinogen.     

Predictors of renal function following lung or heart-lung transplantation

BACKGROUND: Renal failure is a common complication following non-renal solid organ transplantation. The purpose of our study was to define the rate of decline in renal function and to identify independent risk factors associated with renal failure following lung or heart-lung transplantation. METHODS: Between May 1986 and December 1998, 219 patients underwent lung or heart-lung transplantation at the University of Minnesota and survived at least six months (33 heart-lung, 66 bilateral single lung, and 120 unilateral single lung transplants). The mean age at the time of transplant was 45.9 +/- 11.6 years (mean +/- SD; range, 15 to 65 years), and the mean pre-transplant serum creatinine level was 0.88 +/- 0.19 mg/dL. All patients were treated with a calcineurin inhibitor (164 cyclosporine, 55 tacrolimus). RESULTS: During the follow-up period (median 44 months, range 6.8 to 163 months), 16 patients (7.3%) developed end-stage renal disease. The cumulative incidence of doubling of serum creatinine was 34% at one year, 43% at two years and 53% by five years. Factors associated with the primary end point of the time to doubling of the baseline serum creatinine by proportional hazards regression were cumulative periods with diastolic blood pressure greater than 90 mm Hg [relative risk (RR) 1.30, P = 0.02] and the serum creatinine value at one month post-transplantation (RR 1.28, P = 0.03). Use of tacrolimus during the first six months after transplantation was associated with a significant decrease in the risk for time to doubling of serum creatinine (RR 0.38, P = 0.009) and a lower rate of acute rejection. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that potential renoprotective strategies following lung or heart-lung transplantation include avoidance of peri-transplant renal injury, diligent blood pressure control, and preferential use of tacrolimus over cyclosporine.     

Lamivudine for hepatitis B in liver transplantation: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus (HBV) has been associated with a high rate of reinfection and graft failure. Lamivudine, a potent inhibitor of HBV replication, has been shown to prevent viral recurrence after transplantation. METHODS: The effectiveness of lamivudine monotherapy for the management of HBV recurrence after liver transplantation was assessed. Lamivudine was used in three patient groups: (1) patients started before transplantation and continued after transplantation (n = 13); (2) patients treated after transplantation (n = 15); and (3) patients with de novo hepatitis B after transplantation (n = 4). RESULTS: Median follow-up on lamivudine was 24 months. Active viral replication (HBV-DNA+) was seen in 17 (53%) of 32 at treatment initiation. All lost HBV-DNA at a mean of 2.4+/-1.6 months after lamivudine initiation. Twenty-six (81%) patients remain free of viral recurrence. Six (19%) patients have evidence of breakthrough infection with the YMDD mutant of HBV, two of whom progressed to graft failure. All four patients in group 1 who developed breakthrough had evidence of hepatitis B surface antigen expression in the explanted liver by immunohistochemistry despite being serum HBV-DNA negative before transplantation. No difference was observed among the three groups in DNA clearance or breakthrough rates. CONCLUSIONS: Lamivudine achieves viral DNA clearance in almost all patients. Expression of viral antigens in the liver seems to identify patients at risk of developing HBV-DNA recurrence. Disease-free survival of 81% at 22 months is similar to data with hepatitis B immunoglobulin therapy. Given the safe clinical profile and high efficacy in the prevention of disease recurrence, lamivudine will favorably change the outlook of liver transplantation for HBV.     

Mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy in liver transplantation

Aim

Calcineurin inhibitors (CI) are associated with significant morbidity in transplant recipients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) monotherapy in liver transplantation (LT).

Methods

We analysed 32 patients (24 males, 8 female, of mean age 55.7 years) who underwent LT between 1994 and 2003. In 29 patients immunosuppressive therapy was cyclosporine; in three patients it was tacrolimus. Eleven patients were submitted for LT due to hepatitis B cirrhosis; eight for hepatitis C cirrhosis, six for alcoholic cirrhosis, and seven for other diseases. In these patients, MMF was added gradually, simultaneously reducing the dosage of CI up to complete withdrawal. We considered the efficacy (decrease in serum creatinine) and the incidence of complications (acute and chronic rejection, leukopenia, diarrhea).

Results

Patients were converted to MMF after a median of 50 months after LT. MMF monotherapy was started after a median of 9 months in association with CI. Indications for switch to MMF monotherapy were adverse effects of CI (renal disfunction in 30 patients) and de novo tumoral evidence after LT in two patients. Median dosage of MMF was 750 mg twice daily (500-1500 mg). There was a statistically significant decrease in serum creatinine levels (2.02-1.7 mg/dL; P = .0001). Side effects were: leukopenia in five of 32 patients (15.6%), diarrhea in four of 32 patients (12.5%), and one acute rejection.

Conclusion

MMF monotherapy improved renal function and was not associated with a significant risk of allograft rejection. Side effects were mild with dose regimens up to 750 mg twice daily.