喉切除术后患者生活质量的评估

目的　评估喉切除术后患者的生活质量及其影响因素 ,以提出相应的对策。方法　以综合生活质量评定问卷、华盛顿大学生活质量头颈调查表、咽喉功能调查表研究了山东大学齐鲁医院42例行喉切除术后的喉癌、下咽癌患者和 38例健康人的生活质量。结果　喉切除术后患者在躯体、心理、社会功能方面显著差于对照组 ;各方面对生活质量影响作用在患者组自大到小依次为 :心理功能、躯体功能、社会功能、物质生活。影响喉切除术后患者生活质量的因素主要有 :患者对病情的估计、工作情况、是否保留喉功能、呼吸情况、讲话情况、容貌、是否拔管等。影响喉切除术后患者心理功能的维度因素按其影响作用依次为躯体功能、社会功能、物质生活。影响患者社会功能的维度因素按其影响作用依次为心理功能、物质生活、躯体功能。喉切除术后患者的生活需求重点前 5位依次为 :身体健康、经济收入、心理健康、社会地位和受人尊重、娱乐生活。结论　全面研究喉切除术后患者的生活质量是十分必要的。喉切除术后患者的生活质量受多种因素影响。争取通过心理干预、临床干预、社会干预的综合作用 ,喉切除术后患者的生活质量可望得到全面提高     

喉切除术后患者生活质量的研究

目的研究喉切除术后患者的生活质量及其意义。方法以综合生活质量评定问卷调查了42例行喉切除术后患者的生活质量,研究生活质量主客观指标之间和各维度之间的相互关系及其对生活质量的影响。结果 喉切除术后患者的生活质量在心理功能和社会功能维度主客观指标间呈现显著差异。主观满意度对生活质量的影响大于客观状态。客观状态较差时对主观生活满意度的影响较大,客观状态较好时对主观生活满意度的影响较小。影响躯体功能和社会功能的最重要的因素均为心理功能。影响心理功能最重要的因素为躯体功能。在对生存时间和生活质量做出选择时,多数患者首选生存时间。结论全面研究喉切除术后患者的生活质量可为临床决策提供重要依据,心理干预可望在提高患者生活质量方面起到重要作用。     

喉环状软骨上部分切除术后患者生活质量评估

目的 评估喉环状软骨上部分切除术后患者的生活质量及其影响因素.方法 分析44例患者生存率,采用生存质量表(UW-QOL)、头颈肿瘤患者行为状态量表(PSS-HN)、表现状态量表(KPS)联合评估其生活质量和分析影响因素.结果 44例喉癌患者3年生存率为86.3％,早、晚期喉癌患者3年生存率分别为95.8％和77.8％....     

喉切除术后患者生活质量的研究

目的 研究喉切除术后患者的生活质量及其意义。方法 以综合生活质量评定问卷调查了42例行喉切除术后患者的生活质量，研究生活质量主客观指标之间和各维度之间的相互关系及其对生活质量的影响。结果 喉切除术后患者的生活质量在心理功能和社会功能维度主客观指标间呈现显著差异。主观满意度对生活质量的影响大于客观状态。客观状态较筹时对主观生活满意度的影响较大，客观状态较好时对主观生活满意度的影响较小。影响躯体功能和社会功能的最重要的因素均为心理功能。影响心理功能最重要的因素为躯体功能。在对生存时间和生活质量做出选择时，多数患者首选生存时间。结论 全面研究喉切除术后患者的生活质量可为临床决策提供重要依据，心理干预可望在提高患者生活质量方面起到重要作用。     

喉切除术后患者生存质量的调查及分析

目的　探讨自行制定喉切除术后患者生存质量量表应用于患者生存质量研究的可行性。方法　按规范制定喉切除术后患者生存质量量表 ;对 36例喉部分切除和 4 5例喉全切除的患者进行上述量表问卷调查 ,考核该量表的信度和效度 ;分析喉切除术后患者生存质量及其影响因素。结果　制定的喉切除术后患者生存质量量表由 2 2个指标组成 ,包含 6个方面。量表的信度较好 ,准则关联效度及内容效度有效 ;其分半信度和克朗巴赫系数分别为 0 84 2和 0 889。喉部分切除组与喉全切除组患者生存质量总分的差异有统计学意义 (P <0 0 0 1) ,前者生存质量高于后者 ;其中身体机能、喉功能、心理状态、独立生活能力方面的差异亦有统计学意义 (P值分别 <0 0 0 1、<0 0 0 1、<0 0 1、<0 0 5 )。术式、肿瘤分期、手术并发症、合并症、家庭收入、发音方式及是否佩戴全喉套管是喉切除术后患者生存质量的影响因素。结论　该研究制定的生存质量量表有较好的信度及效度 ,其内容具有喉切除术的专业特性 ,可应用于喉切除术后患者生存质量的调查研究。     

安徽省喉全切除术后生活质量及喉功能康复现状评估

目的 评估安徽省喉全切除术后患者的生活质量,喉功能康复情况以及相关的影响因素,以提出相应治疗策略.方法 采用生活质量综合评定问卷和喉全切除后喉功能康复情况调查表,对我省58例行喉全切除术患者和40位健康人的生活质量及喉功能情况进行回顾性调查分析并评分.结集喉全切除术后患者的生活质量,在躯体、心理、社会功能方面显著差于健...     

喉切除术后患者生存质量的调查及分析

OBJECTIVE: To institute and test the quality of life for laryngectomy, and evaluate the feasibility of above questionnaire in patients after laryngectomy. METHODS: A questionnaire of quality of life for laryngectomy was instituted. An investigation was conducted in patients treated by partial (36, Group A) or total (45, Group B) laryngectomy for laryngeal cancer with above questionnaire. The feasibility, reliability and validity of the questionnaire was evaluated, the quality of life and the influencing factors in laryngectomy were also analyzed. RESULTS: The questionnaire of quality of life for laryngectomy consists of 22 items, covering six aspects. The questionnaire has a comparatively good reliability, and the criterion-related validity and content validity of the questionnaire is valid. The correlation coefficient of split-half method and Cronback's alpha of questionnaire were 0.842 and 0.889 respectively. The composite quality of life scores of group A were significant higher than those of group B ( P < 0.001). The differences in physical function, laryngeal function, psychological state, the ability of living independently were statistically significant (P < 0.001; P < 0.001; P < 0.01; P < 0.05) as well. Seven factors including operative modality, tumor stage, postoperative complication, coexisted disease, family incomes, voicing modality and wearing tracheo-cannula were related to postlaryngectomy quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaire of quality of life for laryngectomy has speciality in laryngectomy and a comparatively good reliability and validity, and it is suitable for quality of life research in patients after laryngectomy.     

保留喉功能的下咽癌切除术

目的探讨下咽癌手术保留喉功能的可行性及疗效.方法对23例下咽癌患者实施保留喉功能的下咽癌切除术,应用带状肌肌筋膜等修复喉咽腔,术后予以辅助性放射治疗.结果23例均恢复发声功能,16例恢复了喉全功能,吞咽成功率为95.7%,并发症发生率为47.8%(11/23).3年和5年生存率分别为69.6%(16/23)和47.8%(11/23).结论下咽癌手术多数能保留喉的正常部分,经过整复可恢复喉的全部或部分功能.     

中晚期喉癌患者术后发音生存质量评估

目的 通过对中晚期喉癌患者行三种不同术式后的发音生存质量分析,指导喉癌治疗方案的选择.方法对30例喉次全切除患者、30例喉全切除未行发音重建患者、30例喉全切除行发音重建患者,采用修改后的美国密执安大学头颈癌患者生存质量量表（university of Michican head and neck quality of life,HNQOL）进行问卷调查,分析三种不同术式患者的生存质量及生存质量随时间发展的变化规律.结果喉全切除行发音重建组在语言交流、嗅觉情况、社会交往及娱乐工作状态方面与喉次全切除组比较无显著性差异,而未行发音重建组与喉次全切除组有显著性差异.结论喉全切除行发音重建可明显提高术后的生存质量.应积极通过临床治疗,心理治疗及社会干预帮助其康复,提高术后生存质量.     

喉部分切除术的远期疗效观察

目的 观察喉部分切除术的远期疗效及喉功能的恢复情况。方法 总结１９８６～１９９５年间各种喉部分切除术３７９例,男２９０例,女８９例。声门上癌１８４例（按１９９２年ＵＩＣＣ标准Ｔ１８例,Ｔ２１１５例,Ｔ３４８例,Ｔ４１３例）,声门癌１９２例（Ｔ１１１５例,Ｔ２６３例,Ｔ３１３例,Ｔ４１例）,跨声门癌３例（Ｔ２１例,Ｔ３２例）。共８种术式,即声带切除术２６列,垂直部分切除术１３８例,额侧切除术７例,声     

Quality of life following total laryngectomy: assessment using the UW-QOL scale

OBJECTIVES: To determine the quality of life (QOL) in patients using valved speech following total laryngectomy with a validated patient self-report scale. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional cohort study. PATIENTS: 63 patients following total laryngectomy using valved speech. INTERVENTION: University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient perception of the QOL over the last 7 days following total laryngectomy in response to specific questions and correlated with sociodemographic and treatment factors. RESULTS: Responses were received from 44 males and 11 females (response rate: 87.3%) with a median age of 66 years (range: 40-84). The mean (SD) composite score of the QOL in our series of patients with total laryngectomy was 81.3 (10.9). As regards the overall QOL, 80% of our patients cited it as very good (45.5%) to good (34.5%). Patients identified speech, appearance, and activity as the most important issues following total laryngectomy. Only age and pharyngo-oesophageal segment closure were significant predictors of QOL scores (Student t test, p < 0.05) and not other demographic and treatment variables. CONCLUSIONS: The composite score and overall QOL were high in our series of total laryngectomy patients and this possibly reflects adequate multidisciplinary management. We strongly urge the use of prospective longitudinal studies that will adequately identify any QOL changes over time. Although the UW-QOL questionnaire is a simple and brief scale, it has limitations that can curtail its effective use in laryngectomy patients and we advise supplementing it with the use of domain-specific questionnaires.     

Quality of life for patients following total laryngectomy vs chemoradiation for laryngeal preservation

BACKGROUND: The incorporation of chemotherapy and radiation, either sequentially or concurrently, has been increasingly used for organ preservation in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. Traditional outcome measures of clinical response such as locoregional control and survival have been similar for patients treated with chemoradiotherapy and those treated with total laryngectomy (TL). The impact of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for laryngeal preservation on the overall quality of life (QOL) of patients has not been clearly evaluated, particularly in direct comparison with TL. OBJECTIVE: To compare the QOL of patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with those treated with TL. DESIGN: Nonrandomized, retrospective, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Academic tertiary care referral center. METHODS: The study included 42 patients with advanced stage III or IV cancer of the larynx, who were treated with either concurrent chemoradiotherapy or TL with postoperative radiation therapy. Patients had to be without evidence of recurrence and to have completed therapy at least 3 months prior to inclusion in the study. Quality of life was measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) in tandem with the head and neck module (EORTC QLQ-H&N35). RESULTS: On the core questionnaire (QLQ-C30), there were no statistically significant differences in the overall QOL score between the 2 groups. Functional subscale analysis revealed a trend for patients in the surgery and radiotherapy group to experience greater difficulties with social functioning (P =.18) relative to the chemoradiation group. On the QLQ-H&N35, surgery patients reported significantly greater difficulties with sensory disturbances (smell and taste, P =.001), use of painkillers (P =.049), and coughing (P =.004). On the other hand, chemoradiation patients reported significantly greater problems with dry mouth (P =.02). CONCLUSIONS: Both chemoradiation and TL affect, albeit differently, the QOL of patients treated for advanced cancer of the larynx. Although these differences can be detected by functional and subscale analysis, the overall QOL scores of both groups seem similar.