Induction of anesthesia in children following administration of methohexital into the sigmoid colon.

The authors evaluated the sigmoidal administration of methohexital, the effect of methohexital concentration (1% versus 2%), the effect of dosage (25 mg/kg versus 15 mg/kg) on sleep-success rate, administration - sleep time, recovery time and the effect of aspirating the residual methohexital on recovery time. The study demonstrated that both 1% solution and 25 mg/kg of sigmoidal methohexital were independently associated with significantly higher sleep success rate and faster onset of sleep compared with 2% and 15 mg/kg of sigmoidal methohexital solution respectively. The recovery time was significantly affected by the dose of methohexital and was not significantly affected by the concentration of methohexital solution. Aspiration of the residual methohexital did not significantly affect the recovery time.     

Methohexital plasma concentrations in children following rectal administration

Despite the increasing use of rectal methohexital as a premedicant-induction agent in pediatric anesthesia, there are no data to confirm the assumption that low plasma methohexital concentrations are the cause of inadequate sedation of children and that high concentrations are associated with the loss of consciousness. Plasma methohexital concentrations were determined in 20 ASA Class I children, ages 2-7 yr, after the rectal administration of methohexital (25 mg/kg). Seventeen of the 20 children in this study fell asleep after receiving the drug and achieved peak plasma concentrations greater than 2 micrograms/ml. The maximum plasma methohexital concentration in children that did not fall asleep was less than 2 micrograms/ml. The mean time to the onset of sleep after drug administration was 8.3 min (at which time the mean plasma concentration was 4.4 micrograms/ml). The mean peak plasma concentration and the mean time to peak plasma concentration were 4.7 micrograms/ml and 13.9 min, respectively. Loss of consciousness after rectal administration of methohexital correlates well with the plasma concentration of the drug.     

The prolonged duration of rocuronium in Chinese patients

We compared the potency and duration of action of rocuronium in Chinese and Caucasian patients during general anesthesia. Thirty-six women (18 Caucasian and 18 Chinese) and 36 children (18 Caucasian and 18 Chinese) were evaluated during the administration of propofol/fentanyl anesthesia. Patients in each age group were randomized into three subgroups to receive single doses of 0.06, 0. 12, or 0.18 mg/kg rocuronium (adults) or 0.12, 0.18, or 0.24 mg/kg rocuronium (children). Neuromuscular blockade was assessed by electromyography of the adductor pollicis after train-of-four (TOF) stimulation of the ulnar nerve. Dose response curves were constructed when maximum neuromuscular depression of the first twitch of the train (T(1)) was obtained. A second bolus dose of rocuronium was then administered to a total dose of 0.6 mg/kg. The times of spontaneous recovery to T(1) 10%, 25%, and 90% of control and to TOF 0.25, 0.50, and 0.70 were recorded. For both adults and children, recovery occurred later in Chinese than in Caucasian patients (P<0.05 for T(1) of 10%, 25%, 75%, and 90% and TOF to 0.7). The 50% effective dose was smaller in Chinese adults (125+/-63 vs. 159+/-66 microg/kg) and Chinese children (171+/-43 vs. 191+/-46 microg/kg) than in Caucasian adults and children, but the difference was not statistically significant. In adults, time to 25% T(1) recovery was 43+/-13 min in Chinese patients and 33+/-10 min in Caucasian patients (P<0.05). The corresponding values were more rapid for children: 30+/-10 and 24+/-6 min (P<0.05). We conclude that the recovery from rocuronium neuromuscular blockade was longer in Chinese compared with Caucasian patients and in adults compared with children.     

The cost-effectiveness of methohexital versus propofol for sedation during monitored anesthesia care

We designed this study to test the hypothesis that methohexital is a cost-effective alternative to propofol for sedation during local anesthesia. Sixty consenting women undergoing breast biopsy procedures under local anesthesia were randomly assigned to receive an infusion of either propofol (50 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) or methohexital (40 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)). The sedative infusion rate was titrated to maintain an observer's assessment of alertness/sedation (OAA/S) score of 3 (with 1 = awake/alert to 5 = asleep). Fentanyl 25 microg i.v. was administered as a "rescue" analgesic during the operation. We assessed the level of sedation (OAA/S score), vital signs, time to achieve an OAA/S score of 3 at the onset and a score of 1 after discontinuing the infusion, discharge times, perioperative side effects, and patient satisfaction. The direct cost of methohexital was lower than that of propofol, based on the milligram dosage infused during the operation. The sedative onset (to achieve an OAA/S score of 3) and the recovery (to return to an OAA/S score of 1) times, as well as discharge times, did not differ between the two groups. Patients receiving methohexital had a significantly lower incidence of pain on initial injection compared with those receiving propofol (10% vs 23%). Because the use of methohexital (29.4 +/- 2.7 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) for sedation during breast biopsy procedures has a similar efficacy and recovery profile to that of propofol (36.8 +/- 15.9 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) and is less costly based on the amount infused, it seems to be a cost-effective alternative to propofol for sedation during local anesthesia. However, when the cost of the drug infused and drug wasted was calculated, there was no difference in the overall drug cost. Implications: When administered to maintain a stable level of sedation during local anesthesia, methohexital is an acceptable alternative to propofol. However, the overall drug costs were similar with the two drugs.     

Cardiovascular effects of rectal methohexital in children.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To define the cardiovascular effects of rectal methohexital in children with normal cardiac function. DESIGN: Cardiovascular evaluation of each patient was performed before and after medication. Each patient's predrug results were used as control measurements for comparison with measurements made after methohexital administration. SETTING: Inpatient operating room induction area in a privately endowed philanthropic children's hospital. PATIENTS: Forty-seven children age 35 +/- 22 months (mean +/- SD) scheduled for elective orthopedic or plastic surgery, free of cardiac or pulmonary disease, and receiving no medication with central nervous system activity. INTERVENTIONS: Control measurements of heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and echocardiographic evaluations were obtained on the day before scheduled surgery. Repeat measurements were performed after the onset of methohexital-induced sleep. The time span of the measurements was designed to include the period of peak plasma methohexital concentration. In the preoperative holding area, 30 mg/kg of a 10% methohexital solution was administered rectally. If sleep did not occur in 15 minutes, an additional 15 mg/kg was given. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: HR increased markedly after rectal methohexital [126 +/- 23 beats per minute (bpm) to 144 +/- 21 bpm, p less than 0.001], and stroke volume (SV) decreased (24 +/- 9 ml to 21 +/- 8 ml, p less than 0.01). There were no significant changes in BP or cardiac index. The shortening fraction and ejection fraction remained within the normal range for this age-group. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal methohexital induces sleep in healthy pediatric patients with minimal cardiovascular side effects. The primary effects are increased HR and decreased SV.     

Comparison of propofol with methohexital for outpatient anesthesia

Propofol is an intravenous anesthetic currently available for clinical investigative use. The intraoperative and postoperative effects of propofol were compared to methohexital when used as an adjuvant to nitrous oxide for outpatient anesthesia. Sixty healthy young women were randomly assigned to receive either methohexital, 1.5 mg/kg intravenously (IV), or propofol, 2.5 mg/kg IV, for induction of anesthesia. Both drugs produced transient cardiovascular and respiratory depression after induction. Maintenance of anesthesia consisted of either methohexital, 6 +/- 2 mg/min, or propofol, 7 +/- 2 mg/min (mean +/- SD) by continuous infusion in combination with nitrous oxide, 70% in oxygen. Use of a propofol infusion was associated with lower blood pressures and heart rates during maintenance. Propofol was associated with fewer side effects (e.g., hiccoughing, nausea, and vomiting) intra- and postoperatively. Recovery times for awakening, orientation, and ambulation were consistently shorter with propofol. We conclude that propofol is a useful alternative to methohexital for induction and maintenance of outpatient anesthesia.     

Methohexital dissolved in lipid emulsion for intravenous induction of anesthesia in infants and children.

The induction dose of thiopental and propofol has been shown previously to vary during childhood. The methohexital dose needed for satisfactory induction of anesthesia in 50% of patients (ED50) was determined in 75 infants and children, 1 month to 16 yr of age. An intravenous bolus of methohexital, dissolved in a lipid emulsion to decrease pain on injection, was given over 10 s. After 30 s the anesthesia mask was applied. The patient was considered to be asleep if there were no gross movements when the head was placed in the sniffing position and the anesthesia mask applied, and no response to verbal command (tested in children more than 4 yr of age) during the next 30 s while the patient breathed O2. ED50 (+/- SE) was 2.6 +/- 0.2 mg/kg in infants 1-6 months of age, 1.9 +/- 0.1 mg/kg in infants 7-11 months of age, 1.4 +/- 0.1 mg/kg in children 1-3 yr of age, 1.1 +/- 0.1 mg/kg in children 4-7 yr of age, and 1.3 +/- 0.1 mg/kg in children 8-16 yr of age. ED50 in each of the two groups of infants was significantly greater than ED50 in each of the three other groups (P less than 0.05). Pain or discomfort on injection was observed in 1 infant and 3 children (5%). Eight patients (11%) had apnea longer than 15 s, and excitatory phenomena occurred in 9 (12%). It is concluded that the dose of methohexital needed for induction of anesthesia varies with age.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Midazolam premedication delays recovery from propofol-induced sevoflurane anesthesia in children 1–3 yr

PURPOSE: To study the effect of midazolam premedication on the recovery characteristics of sevoflurane anesthesia induced with propofol in pediatric outpatients. METHODS: Sixty children, one to three years, presenting for ambulatory adenoidectomy were randomly assigned , in a double-blind fashion, to receive either 0.5 mg x kg(-1) midazolam (Group M) or placebo (Group P) p.o. 30 min before anesthesia. Anesthesia was induced with 10 microg x kg(-1) atropine, 10 microg x kg(-1) alfentanil, and 3-4 mg x kg(-1) propofol i.v.. Tracheal intubation was facilitated with 0.2 mg x kg(-1) mivacurium. Anesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide/oxygen (FiO2 0.3) and sevoflurane with controlled ventilation. Recovery characteristics were compared using the modified Aldrete scoring system, the Pain/Discomfort scale and measuring specific recovery end-points (emergence, full Aldrete score, discharge). A postoperative questionnaire was used to evaluate the children's well-being at home until 24 hr after discharge. RESULTS: Emergence from anesthesia (22 +/- 9 vs 16 +/- 6 min (mean +/- SD), P = 0.005) and achieving full Aldrete scores (30 +/- 11 vs 24 +/- 16 min, P = 0.006) were delayed in patients receiving midazolam. Children in the placebo group were given postoperative analgesia sooner than those in the midazolam group (18 +/- 11 vs 23 +/- 8 min, P = 0.009). More children premedicated with midazolam suffered from arousal distress (20% vs 3%, P = 0.04) and scored higher on the Pain/Discomfort scale (P = 0.004) at 20 min after arrival in the recovery room. Discharge was not affected by premedication and well-being at home was similar in the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Oral premedication with midazolam delays early recovery but not discharge after ambulatory sevoflurane anesthesia induced with propofol in children one to three years. Midazolam did not improve the quality of recovery.     

Methohexital Impairs Osmoregulation: Studies in Conscious and Anesthetized Volume-expanded Dogs

Background: Anesthetic agents influence central regulations. This study investigated the effects of methohexital anesthesia on renal and hormonal responses to acute sodium and water loading in dogs in the absence of surgical stress.

Methods: Fourteen experiments (two in each dog) were performed in seven well-trained, chronically tracheotomized beagle dogs kept in highly standardized environmental and dietary conditions (2.5 mmol sodium and 91 ml water/kg body weight daily). Experiments lasted 3 h, while the dogs were conscious (7 experiments) or, after 1 h control, while they were anesthetized (7 experiments) with methohexital (initial dose 6.6 mg/kg body weight and maintenance infusion 0.34 mg *symbol* min sup -1 *symbol* kg sup -1 body weight) over a period of 2 h. In both experiments, extracellular volume expansion was performed by intravenous infusion of a balanced isoosmolar electrolyte solution (0.5 ml *symbol* min sup -1 *symbol* kg sup -1 body weight). Normal arterial blood gases were maintained by controlled mechanical ventilation. In another five dogs the same protocol was used, and vasopressin (0.05 mU *symbol* min sup -1 *symbol* kg sup -1 body weight) was infused intravenously during methohexital anesthesia.

Results: Values are given as means. During methohexital anesthesia, mean arterial pressure decreased from 108 to 101 mmHg, and heart rate increased from 95 to 146 beats/min. Renal sodium excretion decreased; urine volume increased; and urine osmolarity decreased from 233 to 155 mosm/l, whereas plasma osmolarity increased from 301 to 312 mosm/l because of an increase in plasma sodium concentration from 148 to 154 mmol/l. Plasma renin activity, plasma aldosterone concentration, plasma atrial natriuretic peptide, and plasma antidiuretic hormone concentrations (range 1.8-2.8 pg/ml) did not change in either protocol. In the presence of exogenous vasopressin (antidiuretic hormone 3.3 pg/ml), water diuresis did not occur, and neither plasma osmolarity nor the plasma concentration of sodium changed.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a 0.1 mg/kg dose of cisatracurium besylate in children during N2O/O2/propofol anesthesia

We studied the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cisatracurium in 9 children (mean weight, 17.1 kg) aged 1-6 yr (mean, 3.75 yr) during propofol-nitrous oxide anesthesia. Neuromuscular monitoring was performed. Venous samples were taken before injection of a 0.1 mg/kg dose of cisatracurium and then at 2, 5, 10, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. Cisatracurium plasma concentrations were determined by high performance liquid chromatography. Onset time was 2.5 +/- 0.8 min, recovery to 25% of baseline twitch height was 37.6 +/- 10.2 min, and the 25%-75% recovery index was 10.9 +/- 3.7 min. Distribution and elimination half-lives were 3.5 +/- 0.9 min and 22.9 +/- 4.5 min, respectively. Steady-state volume of distribution (0.207 +/- 0.031 L/kg) and total body clearance (6.8 +/- 0.7 mL/min/kg) were significantly larger than those published for adults. Pharmacodynamic results were comparable to those obtained in pediatric studies during halothane or opioid anesthesia with the exception of a longer recovery to 25% baseline. Although the plasma-effect compartment equilibration rate constant was twofold faster (0.115 +/- 0.025 min(-1)) than that published for cisatracurium in adults, the effect compartment concentration corresponding to 50% block was similar (129 +/- 27 ng/mL).     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vecuronium in the obese surgical patient.

The effect of obesity on the disposition and action of vecuronium was studied in 14 surgical patients. After induction of anesthesia with thiopental and maintenance of anesthesia by inhalation of nitrous oxide and halothane, seven obese patients (93.4 +/- 13.9 kg, 166% +/- 30% of ideal body weight, mean +/- SD) and seven control patients (60.9 +/- 12.3 kg, 93% +/- 6% of ideal body weight) received 0.1 mg/kg of vecuronium. Plasma arterial concentrations of muscle relaxant were determined at 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 300, and 360 min by a spectrofluorometric method. Simultaneously, neuromuscular blockade was assessed by stimulation of the ulnar nerve and quantification of thumb adductor response. Times to 50% recovery of twitch were longer in the obese than in the control patients (75 +/- 8 versus 46 +/- 8 min) as were 5%-25% recovery times (14.9 +/- 4.0 versus 10.0 +/- 1.7 min) and 25%-75% recovery times (38.4 +/- 13.8 versus 16.7 +/- 10.3 min). However, vecuronium pharmacokinetics were similar for both groups. When the data were calculated on the basis of ideal body weight (IBW) for obese and control patients, total volume of distribution (791 +/- 303 versus 919 +/- 360 mL/kg IBW), plasma clearance (4.65 +/- 0.89 versus 5.02 +/- 1.13 mL.min-1.kg IBW-1), and elimination half-life (119 +/- 43 versus 133 +/- 57 min) were not different between groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Sevoflurane-maintained anesthesia induced with propofol or sevoflurane in small children: induction and recovery characteristics

PURPOSE: To compare the induction and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane anesthesia induced with either propofol or sevoflurane in pediatric outpatients. METHODS: Fifty-two children, aged 1-3 yr, presenting for ambulatory adenoidectomy were randomly allocated to receive 3 mg.kg-1 propofol i.v. or sevoflurane 8% inspired concentration for induction of anesthesia. Tracheal intubation was facilitated with 0.2 mg.kg-1 mivacurium. Anesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide/oxygen (FiO2 0.3) and sevoflurane approximately 3-5% inspired concentration with controlled ventilation. Intubation was assessed by an anesthetist blinded to the induction method. Recovery characteristics were compared using the modified Aldrete scoring system, the Pain/Discomfort scale and measuring specific recovery times. A postoperative questionnaire was used to evaluate the children's well-being at home. RESULTS: Intubating conditions were similar in both groups. Emergence from anesthesia occurred earlier with sevoflurane for induction than with propofol (11 +/- 4 vs 17 +/- 7 min (mean +/- SD), P = 0.0002). More children in the sevoflurane group achieved full points on the modified Aldrete scoring system during the first 20 min after anesthesia (P < 0.05). However, children in the sevoflurane group scored higher in the Pain/Discomfort scale at 10 min after anesthesia (P = 0.04) and were given postoperative analgesics earlier than children in the propofol group (13 +/- 5 min vs 18 +/- 11 min, P = 0.03). The time to meet discharge criteria and recovery at home were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Induction of sevoflurane anesthesia with propofol for day-case adenoidectomy results in longer, but more calm, early recovery but does not delay discharge or affect recovery at home.     

Mivacurium for caesarean section in hypertensive parturients receiving magnesium sulphate therapy

The interaction between mivacurium and magnesium sulphate was investigated in a group of parturients undergoing caesarean section under general anaesthesia. Thirty parturients were studied; 10 normotensive controls (group NT), 10 hypertensive controls (group HT) and 10 hypertensives who received magnesium sulphate (group HTM). At induction group HT received 30 microg/kg of alfentanil and group HTM 10 microg/kg of alfentanil and 30 or 60 mg/kg of magnesium sulphate. Neuromuscular function was monitored by electromyography. Mivacurium 0.15 mg/kg was given after 60% recovery of T1 following succinylcholine. Magnesium concentrations and plasma cholinesterase activity were significantly elevated in group HTM (1.57 +/- 0.53 mmol/1 and 4.60 +/- 1.27 kU/1) compared with group HT (0.71 +/- 0.18 mmol/1 and 3.44 +/- 0.97 kU/1) and group NT (0.60 +/- 0.07 mmol/1 and 2.86 +/- 0.82 kU/1) (P < 0.005). Time to maximal recovery, and time from 25-75% of maximal recovery from mivacurium, were significantly prolonged in group HTM (60.9 +/- 15.3 min and 16.8 +/- 5.6 min) compared with group HT (34.9 +/- 7.6 min and 7.6 +/- 3.6 min) and group NT (37.4 +/- 14.4 min and 8.5 +/- 3.4 min) (P < 0.01). Time to 25% recovery was prolonged in group HTM (35.1 +/- 7.4 min) compared with the other two groups (HT: 21.6 +/- 6.4 min and NT: 22.8 +/- 10.2 min) (P < 0.01). Whilst the duration of action of mivacurium, determined by electromyography, is prolonged by subtherapeutic serum magnesium concentrations, of the available non-depolarizing relaxants mivacurium would seem to be most appropriate for caesarean section.     

Neuromuscular effects of rapacuronium in pediatric patients during nitrous oxide-halothane anesthesia: comparison with mivacurium

PURPOSE: To describe neuromuscular effects of rapacuronium in pediatric patients during N2O-halothane anesthesia and compare them with mivacurium in children. METHODS: 103 pediatric patients, seven days -12 yr, received rapacuronium or mivacurium during N2O-halothane anesthesia. Onset and recovery of block were measured using EMG (Datex). Block was compared between groups based on drug treatment and age. Children < two years received 1 or 2 mg x kg(-1) rapacuronium: 2-12 yr received either 2 mg x kg(-1) or 3 mg x kg(-1) rapacuronium, or 0.2 mg x kg(-1) mivacurium. RESULTS: There were no differences in onset (1.7+/-1.8 min) or maximum block (T1 2.4+/-8%) among neonates, infants, and toddlers after either dose of rapacuronium. There was no difference between 1 and 2 mg x kg(-1) of rapacuronium block at 60 sec. Train-of-four ratio (T4/T1) >0.7 occurred later after 2 mg x kg(-1) than 1 mg x kg(-1) in these patients (P<0.05). There was no difference in T25 among neonates, infants and toddlers for 1 mg x kg(-1) or 2 mg x kg(-1) doses. Rapacuronium, 3 mg x kg(-1), produced maximum block 1.5 min earlier than did mivacurium, 0.2 mg x kg(-1) (P<0.001). There was no difference in block at 60 sec, maximum block or time to maximum block between 2 and 3 mg x kg(-1) rapacuronium for children > two years of age. Maximum block occurred 1.0+/-0.5 min after 2 or 3 mg x kg(-1) when T1 was 0.2+/-1.1% of baseline. T25 and T4/T1 >0.7 occurred 10 to 11 min later after this dose of rapacuronium than after mivacurium. CONCLUSION: Rapacuronium produces block earlier than mivacurium. Recovery from rapacuronium block is dose related and slower than that following mivacurium during halothane anesthesia.     

Comparison of methohexital and pentobarbital for premedication in children

Thirty children scheduled for elective orchiopexy or herniotomy were consecutively assigned at random to premedication with methohexital 80 mg/ml, 20 mg/kg rectally, 15 min before transportation to the operating room, or pentobarbital 28 mg/ml, 7 mg/kg rectally, 45 min before transportation. The quality of premedication was recorded at induction with halothane 1-2% and 60% N2O in O2 by mask. All patients received a caudal injection of bupivacaine 1.9 mg/ml, 1.25 ml/kg before surgery. Following completion of anaesthesia, the postoperative wake-up time and the duration of stay in the post-operative recovery room were recorded. The degree and quality of recovery were assessed using the Aldrete score every 30 min until discharge from the recovery room. The group of children receiving methohexital showed a highly significantly shorter awakening time, and a highly significantly shorter stay in the recovery room compared to the pentobarbital group. The children in both groups had a quiet, easy recovery without significant signs of confusion or agitation, and no difference in quality of recovery could be shown. Emergence delirium or agitation in connection with pentobarbital premedication and a possible relation to postoperative pain is discussed.     

Dose-Response of Rocuronium Bromide in Children Anesthetized with Propofol: A Comparison with Succinylcholine

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the potency of rocuronium during propofol/fentanyl/N2 O anesthesia in children and to compare the time course of action of rocuronium at doses of two and three times the ED95 with that of succinylcholine.

Methods: Rocuronium (120, 160, 200, or 240 micro gram/kg) was administered to 48 children aged 2-10 yr. Neuromuscular block was assessed by monitoring the electromyographic response of the adductor digiti minimi to supramaximal stimulation of the ulnar nerve at 2 Hz for 2 s every 10 s. Potency was determined by log-probit transformation and least-squares linear regression analysis of dose and response. In a second group of 30 children, the onset and recovery profile of rocuronium at doses of two and three times the ED95 was compared with that of succinylcholine (2 mg/kg).

Results: Values for ED50 and ED95 were 210 +/- 24 and 404 +/- 135 micro gram/kg, respectively. The time to 90% neuromuscular block after 1.2 mg/kg rocuronium (three times the ED95), 33 +/- 5 s (mean +/- SD), did not differ significantly from that after succinylcholine, at 30 +/- 7 s; however, both were significantly less than that after 0.8 mg/kg rocuronium, 46 +/- 8 s (P < 0.05). The time to 25% recovery from 1.2 micro gram/kg rocuronium, 41 +/- 13 min, was approximately 50% greater than that after 0.8 mg/kg, at 27 +/- 6 min (P < 0.001), and eight times greater than that after succinylcholine, at 5.2 +/- 1.9 min (P < 0.001).     

Neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects of mivacurium in children

The neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects of mivacurium chloride (BW B1090U) were evaluated in 90 children (2-12 yr) during N2O:O2 halothane or N2O:O2 narcotic anesthesia. Neuromuscular response was evaluated by recording the force of contraction of the adductor of the thumb during train-of-four stimulation at 0.1 Hz. The children were divided into two groups. Patients in group A (n = 45) were anesthetized with N2O:O2 and halothane (1% inspired) and patients in group B (n = 45) were anesthetized with N2O:O2 and fentanyl or morphine. Each group was further divided into five subgroups of nine children. Children in the first three sets of subgroups (A1-A3, B1-B3) received an initial dose of 0.02, 0.04, 0.05, 0.06 or 0.07 mg/kg mivacurium to determine dose response relationships under the different anesthetic regimens. The ED50 and ED95 neuromuscular blocking doses calculated from this single dose technique were 0.051 mg/kg and 0.095 mg/kg, respectively, in children anesthetized with halothane N2O:O2, and 0.059 mg/kg and 0.11 mg/kg in children anesthetized with N2O:O2 narcotic. The fourth subset of each group (A4 and B4) received 0.09 mg/kg and 0.11 mg/kg mivacurium, the estimated ED95 for each respectively. The last subsets (A5 and B5) received 0.2 mg/kg. This dose induced 100% depression of the twitch response in all 18 patients in 1.8 +/- 0.1 min, with recovery to 5%, 25%, and 95% of control occurring in 8.4 +/- 0.5, 11.2 +/- 0.6 and 18.4 +/- 1.6 min, respectively. The recovery indices for all patients were 4.6 +/- 0.6 min for 25-75% recovery and 9.7 +/- 1.3 min for 5-95% recovery.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Premedication with midazolam delays recovery after ambulatory sevoflurane anesthesia in children.

We studied the effect of oral premedication with midazolam on the recovery characteristics of sevoflurane anesthesia in small children. In a randomized, double-blinded study, 60 children (1-3 yr, ASA physical status I or II) undergoing ambulatory adenoidectomy received either midazolam 0.5 mg/kg (Group M) or placebo (Group P) PO approximately 30 min before the induction of anesthesia. All children received atropine 0.01 mg/kg IV and alfentanil 10 microg/kg IV before the induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane up to 8 vol% inspired concentration in N2O 67% in O2. Tracheal intubation was facilitated with mivacurium 0.2 mg/kg. Anesthesia was continued with sevoflurane adjusted to maintain hemodynamic stability. In the postanesthesia care unit, predetermined recovery end points (emergence, recovery, discharge) were recorded. A pain/ discomfort scale was used to determine the quality of recovery. A postoperative questionnaire was used to evaluate the well-being of the patient at home 24 h after surgery. Emergence (spontaneous eye opening), recovery (full points on the modified Aldrete scale), and discharge were achieved later in Group M than in Group P (15+/-6 vs. 11+/-3 min [P = 0.002], 25+/-17 vs. 16+/-6 min [P = 0.01], and 80+/-23 vs. 70+/-23 min [P = 0.03]). Side effects, postanesthetic excitement, and analgesic treatment did not differ significantly between groups. At home, more children in Group P (30%) experienced disturbed sleep during the night compared with those in Group M (4%) (P = 0.007). IMPLICATIONS: In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study, premedication with midazolam 0.5 mg/kg PO delayed recovery in children 1-3 yr of age after brief (<30 min) sevoflurane anesthesia. Except for more peaceful sleep at home, premedication did not affect the quality of recovery.     

Intramuscular rapacuronium in infants and children: dose-ranging and tracheal intubating conditions.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous rapacuronium's rapid onset and short duration suggest that intramuscular rapacuronium might facilitate tracheal intubation without prolonged paralysis. Accordingly, the authors injected rapacuronium into the deltoid muscle to determine the optimal dose and time for intubation in pediatric patients. METHODS: Unpremedicated patients (aged, 2 months to 3 yr) were studied. Part I: Spontaneous minute ventilation (V(E)) and twitch tension were measured during N2O/halothane anesthesia. Rapacuronium (2.2-5.5 mg/kg, given intramuscularly, n = 23), succinylcholine (4 mg/kg, given intramuscularly, n = 12), or vecuronium (0.1 mg/kg, given intravenously, n = 15) was given. Time to 50% depression of V(E) and 10% recovery of twitch were measured. Dose for each patient was changed 10-20% according to the previous patient's response. Part II: In 22 patients anesthetized with 0.82-1.0% halothane, the optimal rapacuronium dose determined in part I (infants, 2.8 mg/kg; children, 4.8 mg/kg) was given intramuscularly. Laryngoscopy was scored. Time to laryngoscopy was increased or decreased 0.5 min according to the previous patient's response. RESULTS: Part I: Rapacuronium typically depressed ventilation in < or = 2 min with 10% twitch recovery in 20-60 min. With succinylcholine, median time to ventilatory depression was 1.3 and 1.1 min for infants and children, respectively; for vecuronium, 0.7 and 0.6 min. Part I: Intubating conditions were good-excellent at 3.0 and 2.5 min in infants and children, respectively; time to 10% twitch recovery (mean +/- SD) was 31 +/- 14 and 36 +/- 14 min in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study indicates that deltoid injection of rapacuronium, 2.8 mg/kg in infants and 4.8 mg/kg in children, permits tracheal intubation within 2.5-3.0 min, despite a light plane of anesthesia. Duration of action is intermediate.     

The recovery of cognitive function after remifentanil-nitrous oxide anesthesia is faster than after an isoflurane-nitrous oxide-fentanyl combination in elderly patients

We tested the hypothesis that remifentanil-nitrous oxide (N(2)O) anesthesia shortens postoperative emergence and recovery compared with an isoflurane-N(2)O-fentanyl combination in elderly patients undergoing spinal surgery. A total of 60 patients (>65 yr old) were randomly assigned to one of two groups for maintenance of anesthesia. After the induction with 3.6 +/- 1.2 mg/kg IV thiopental and endotracheal intubation facilitated with 1.4 +/- 0.5 mg/kg succinylcholine, patients were maintained with either 0.5%-1.5% isoflurane, 70% N(2)O, and up to 7 microg/kg fentanyl (iso/fent group) or 48 +/- 11 microg/kg remifentanil and 70% N(2)O (remi group). A mini-mental status examination was used to assess cognitive ability preoperatively, at 15, 30, and 60 min after arrival at the postanesthesia care unit and again 12-24 h postoperatively. The time from the conclusion of anesthesia to spontaneous respiration was similar in both groups. Times to eye opening (4.8 +/- 2.6 vs 2.3 +/- 1.1 min), extubation (6.8 +/- 3.8 vs 3.2 +/- 2.1 min), and verbalization (9.9 +/- 6.2 vs 3.9 +/- 2.6 min) were significantly shorter for the remi group (P < 0.05). Postoperative mini-mental status examination scores were significantly lower in the iso/fent group at 15 (16.3 +/- 5.8 vs 23. 7 +/- 3.3), 30 (20.2 +/- 5.2 vs 26.3 +/- 2.7), and 60 min (23.5 +/- 4.4 vs 27.5 +/- 2.0) (P < 0.001); however, the scores equalized after 12 h. Requirements for postoperative analgesics were similar in the two groups. More patients in the remi group were treated with antiemetics (21 vs 7, P = 0.06). Use of remifentanil-N(2)O for maintenance did not shorten the overall length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit; a stay is often related to multiple administrative issues, rather than cognitive recovery. IMPLICATIONS: Maintenance of anesthesia with remifentanil-nitrous oxide (N(2)O), compared with isoflurane-N(2)O-fentanyl, can safely shorten postoperative recovery of cognitive function in a geriatric population. Earlier recovery may facilitate postoperative neurological assessment. Use of remifentanil-N(2)O for maintenance did not shorten the overall length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit, a stay often related to multiple administrative issues, rather than cognitive recovery.