Olmesartan, a novel angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist, reduces severity of atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E deficient mice associated with reducing superoxide production

Background and aim

Oxidative stress may play an important role in the development of atherosclerosis. Some angiotensin II type 1 (AT₁) receptor antagonists have the capacity of reducing oxidative stress in addition to the hemodynamic actions. Accordingly, we assessed the hypothesis that olmesartan, a novel AT₁ receptor antagonist, reduced the severity of atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein (apo) E-deficient mice associated with reducing oxidative stress.

Methods and results

Atherosclerosis was induced in apo E-deficient mice fed a high fat diet. Mice were intraperitoneally treated with an injection of olmesartan (1 mg/kg/day) daily over 8 weeks, and were compared with the untreated controls. Blood pressure was not changed significantly by the olmesartan treatment. Fatty streak plaque developed in apo E-deficient mice, and was suppressed in mice that received olmesartan. In addition, olmesartan reduced not only superoxide production but the overload of oxidative stress in aortic walls. There were no significant differences in serum lipid levels between olmesartan-treated and -untreated groups. In vitro study showed that both olmesartan and its active metabolite RNH-6270, an enantiomer of olmesartan, suppressed interferon-γ, macrophage inflammatory protein-2, and thioredoxin (a marker of oxidative stress) concentrations in cultured cells.

Conclusion

Olmesartan may suppress atherosclerosis via reducing not only superoxide production but also the overload of oxidative stress in this animal model.     

Interferon-beta attenuates angiotensin II-accelerated atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling in apolipoprotein E deficient mice

Atherosclerotic vascular disease is an inflammatory disease. Interferon-beta (IFN-beta) is an important immune modulator. However, the role of IFN-beta in atherosclerotic vascular disease is still not clear. The present study is designed to determine the effects of IFN-beta on atherosclerosis, abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) formation and proliferative vascular remodeling in apolipoprotein E (apoE) deficient mice. Six-month-old male apoE deficient mice fed a normal chow underwent ligation of the common left carotid artery, and were randomly assigned to receive either vehicle or angiotensin II (Ang II, 1.4 mg/kg daily) via a subcutaneously implanted osmotic infusion pump. The animals were further assigned to groups that were subjected to subcutaneous injection of vehicle or murine IFN-beta (10 MIU/kg, daily). Ang II increased atherosclerotic area in the non-ligated carotid artery and aortic arch, induced AAA, and exacerbated ligation-induced adventitial proliferation and neointimal hyperplasia characterized by smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation and macrophage infiltration in the ligated carotid artery. Co-treatment with IFN-beta, had no effects by itself, significantly attenuated Ang II-accelerated increase in the areas of neointima, adventitia, SMC and macrophage in the ligated carotid artery and suppressed Ang II-exacerbated atherosclerosis, but did not affect Ang II-induced AAA formation. These data indicate that IFN-beta can play a prominent anti-atherosclerosis, anti-inflammation, and anti-proliferation role of vasculoprotection.     

The effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and an angiotensin II receptor antagonist on insulin resistance in fructose-fed rats

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and an angiotensin II receptor (AT) antagonist on insulin resistance, especially on muscle fiber composition in fructose-induced insulin-resistant and hypertensive rats. Six-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats were fed either normal rat chow (control) or a fructose-rich diet (FFR). For the last two weeks of a six-week period of either diet, the rats were treated with gum arabic solution as a vehicle (control or FFR), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (FFR+ACE), temocapril (1 mg/kg/ day) or an angiotensin II receptor antagonist (FFR+AT), CS-866 (0.3 mg/kg/day), by gavage, and then the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic glucose clamp technique was performed to evaluate insulin sensitivity. At the end of the glucose clamp, the soleus muscle was dissected for determination of the muscle fiber composition by ATPase methods. Blood pressure at the glucose clamp in the FFR group was significantly higher than that of the control group, and both temocapril and CS-866 significantly lowered the blood pressure of the FFR group. The average rate of glucose infusion during the glucose clamp, as a measure of insulin sensitivity (M value), was significantly lower in the FFR rats compared to the controls (15.4 +/- 0.4, 10.9 +/- 0.6 mg/kg/min, for control and FFR, respectively, P < .01). Both temocapril and CS-866 partially improved the M values compared to FFR (13.2 +/- 0.7, 12.8 +/- 0.5 mg/kg/min, for FFR+ACE, FFR+AT, respectively, P < .01 compared with FFR, P < .05 compared with control). The composite ratio of type I fibers of the soleus muscle was decreased significantly in the FFR rats compared with the controls (82% +/- 2%, 75% +/- 2%, for control and FFR, respectively, P < .01), and both temocapril and CS-866 restored a composite ratio of type I fibers to the same level as that of the controls (81% +/- 1%, 80% +/- 1% for FFR+ACE and FFR+AT, respectively). The M value was significantly correlated with the composition of type I and type II fibers. These results suggest that the fiber composition of skeletal muscle is correlated to insulin resistance, and that both ACE inhibitors and AT antagonists may modulate the muscle fiber composition in a hypertensive and insulin-resistant animal model, fructose-fed rats, to the same extent.     

Intraindividual blood pressure responses to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin receptor blockade

This study aims to test the hypothesis that in some hypertensive subjects the blood pressure (BP) response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition differs from that to angiotensin receptor blockade (ARB); a responder to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition may not respond to ARB or the opposite. A randomized, open-label, crossover, comparative trial of lisinopril 20 mg compared with telmisartan 80 mg (5 weeks per treatment period) was conducted in 32 untreated hypertensives using 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring. Subjects were classified as "responders" and "nonresponders" using an arbitrary threshold of ambulatory BP response (> or =10 mm Hg systolic or > or =5 diastolic) or the median response achieved by each drug. No difference was detected between the drugs in their effect on ambulatory BP (mean difference 1.2+/-7.1/0.7+/-5.1 mm Hg, systolic/diastolic). Significant correlations were found between the antihypertensive responses to the two drugs (r=0.77, p<0.001). Using the arbitrary response criterion, there was a difference between the drugs in the responses in 28%/13% of subjects (9/4 patients) for systolic/diastolic BP (19%/25% using the median response criterion). These data suggest that in some hypertensive patients the BP response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition may fail to predict the response to ARB. It appears that there are differences in the antihypertensive action of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and ARBs that may be clinically important.     

Combined effects of cholesterol reduction and apolipoprotein A-I expression on atherosclerosis in LDL receptor deficient mice

Reduction of total and LDL cholesterol reduces atherosclerosis and clinical cardiovascular events. High density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels have a strong inverse association with atherosclerosis, and overexpression of apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I), the major protein component of HDL, reduces atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic animals. However, little is known about the potential for additive or synergistic effects between cholesterol reduction and apoA-I overexpression on atherosclerosis. In the current study, we tested the hypothesis that significant reduction of plasma cholesterol combined with overexpression of apoA-I would reduce atherosclerosis to a greater extent than either one alone. We used somatic gene transfer of the LDL receptor (to induce cholesterol reduction) and apoA-I in LDL receptor deficient mice fed a Western type diet and compared the combination to expression of each gene alone and to controls. Atherosclerosis was quantitated using two independent methods, by en face analysis of the entire aorta and by cross-sectional analysis of the aortic root. Although the reduction of cholesterol was transient, expression of the LDL receptor alone significantly reduced atherosclerosis by 45% in the aorta and 44% in the aortic root compared with controls. Overexpression of human apoA-I alone reduced atherosclerosis by 42% in the aorta and 44% in the aortic root compared with controls. Co-expression of the LDL receptor with apoA-I resulted in significantly higher levels of apoA-I than expression of apoA-I alone. Although co-expression of the LDL receptor and apoA-I reduced atherosclerosis by 37% in the aorta and 32% in the aortic root compared with controls, the reduction in atherosclerosis was no different than that seen with expression of the LDL receptor alone or apoA-I alone. In summary, in this relatively short-term murine model, simultaneous reduction of cholesterol and expression of apoA-I was associated with higher levels of apoA-I than expression of apoA-I alone but did not result in greater reduction in atherosclerosis compared with either one alone.     

The endothelin receptor antagonist avosentan ameliorates nephropathy and atherosclerosis in diabetic apolipoprotein E knockout mice

Aims/hypothesis  

There is convincing evidence that the endothelin system contributes to diabetic nephropathy and cardiovascular disease. This study aimed to assess the effects of the non-peptidergic endothelin receptor A (ETA) antagonist avosentan in a mouse model of accelerated diabetic nephropathy and atherosclerosis in comparison with the ACE inhibitor, quinapril.     

Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist in deoxycorticosterone acetate-salt hypertensive mice lacking Ren-2 gene

We previously reported that inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) prevented the hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy induced by deoxycorticosterone acetate-salt (DOCA-salt) in 129/SvEvTac mice, which have 2 renin genes (Ren-1 and Ren-2). In the present study, we induced hypertension by uninephrectomy and DOCA-salt in mice having only the Ren-1 gene (C57BL/6J) and investigated the effect of an ACE inhibitor (ramipril, 4 mg. kg(-)(1). d(-)(1)) and an angiotensin type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonist (L-158809, 4 mg. kg(-)(1). d(-)(1)) on the development of hypertension, cardiac hypertrophy, and renal injury. After 4 weeks of treatment, systolic blood pressure in DOCA-salt mice was significantly increased (128+/-2 mm Hg) compared with controls (109+/-2 mm Hg) (P:<0.001), while plasma renin concentration was decreased by 97% (P:<0.001). DOCA-salt also induced left ventricular and renal hypertrophy and renal damage as manifested by proteinuria. Collagen content in the left ventricle and kidney was significantly higher in DOCA-salt mice (P:<0.001). Urinary albumin (P:<0.05) and proliferating cell nucleic antigen-positive cells in the tubules and interstitium of the renal cortex (P:<0.001) were significantly increased in the DOCA-salt group. Neither the ACE inhibitor nor the AT(1) antagonist had any antihypertensive effect; however, they partially prevented cardiac hypertrophy and completely inhibited left ventricular collagen deposition. In the kidney, both the ACE inhibitor and AT(1) antagonist partially reduced the increase in collagen but had no effect on hypertrophy. They also significantly prevented the effect of DOCA-salt on urinary albumin and proliferating cell nucleic antigen expression in the kidney. Despite the lack of an antihypertensive effect, both ACE inhibitor and AT(1) antagonist prevented cardiac remodeling and renal damage. Our results indicate that ACE inhibitors and AT(1) antagonists exert beneficial effects on the heart and kidney in DOCA-salt hypertensive mice independently of their effects on blood pressure.     

Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist; blood pressure reduction in essential hypertension compared with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, enalapril

OBJECTIVE: To compare the blood pressure reduction induced by valsartan, a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist, with that induced by enalapril, an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor in essential hypertension. METHODS: In total 189 adult outpatients with uncomplicated essential hypertension participated in this double-blind study. Patients were allocated randomly in equal numbers to be administered 80 mg valsartan or 20 mg enalapril daily for 12 weeks. Patients whose blood pressure had not been controlled adequately despite 8 weeks of monotherapy were administered additional therapy with 12.5 mg hydroclorothiazide (HCTZ) daily thereafter. Patients were assessed aftger 4, 8 and 12 weeks of therapy. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) after 8 weeks of therapy. Other variables analyzed included the change in sitting systolic blood pressure and percentage responses after 8 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: Valsartan and enalapril were both effective at lowering the blood pressure. Similar falls were induced in the two groups with a similar time course of blood pressure reduction. The mean decreases in SDBP after 8 weeks of therapy were 13.2 mmHg for valsartan and 12.0 mmHg for enalapril. There was no significant difference between the treatments [P = 0.475, 95% confidence interval of the estimated difference (SBP after therapy - SDBP before therapy) -3.5 to 1.6 mmHg]. After 8 weeks of therapy 60.6% had responded to valsartan and 52.6% to enalapril (P = 0.267). Both treatments were tolerated well. Three patients administered enalapril and one patient administered valsartan discontinued their treatment because it made them cough. CONCLUSION: The data show that 80 mg valsartan is as effective as 20 mg enalapril in the treatment of moderate hypertension and that it is tolerated well.     

Combination of half doses of angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in diabetic nephropathy

BACKGROUND: To investigate the renoprotective effect of combination therapy with an angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitor and an angiotensin type I receptor blocker (ARB) on diabetic kidney disease, half doses of each monotherapy were given to type 2 diabetic patients with albuminuria. METHODS: Urinary albumin index (UAI) and blood pressure (BP) were measured in a total of 27 outpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving 10 mg imidapril or 8 mg candesartan per day. Either agent was then substituted with a combination of 5 mg imidapril and 4 mg candesartan. After 3 months of combination therapy, UAI and BP were measured. Changes in the parameters were assessed by paired t test. RESULTS: Although BP was not significantly different prior to and at the end of combination therapy, log-transformed UAI was significantly reduced (P = 0.003) from an initial UAI (mean log-transformed UAI +/- SD) of 79.4 (27.4-231)mg/g Cre to 52.5 (17.1-161)mg/g Cre at the end of combination therapy. The reduction was not associated with the initial UAI, initial BP, decrease in BP, pretreatment medication or other concomitant antihypertensive agents. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy, dual blockade of the renin system with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker significantly reduces albuminuria and, thus, may be renoprotective even when the doses of the agents are reduced by one half.     

Comparative effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers on blood pressure and the kidney

Many clinicians are uncomfortable about using angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (AT(1)-blockers) to treat patients with renal disease because of concerns about increasing serum creatinine levels. However, the benefits of these medications, particularly their efficacy in slowing the progression of renal disease, outweigh such concerns. ACE inhibitors are effective in patients with type 1 diabetes and renal disease, as well as in those with nondiabetic renal disease and proteinuria >0.5 g/d. AT(1)-blockers slow the progression of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Although these classes of medications should not be used in patients with severe renal insufficiency (e.g., glomerular filtration rate <20 mL/min), they may be beneficial in patients with mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency. Nonetheless, caution should be exercised in those with a glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min, and serum creatinine and potassium levels should be checked approximately 1 week after starting treatment. There is also evidence suggesting that these medications lead to greater reductions in blood pressure and proteinuria when used in combination than when alone. The purpose of this paper is to review the mechanisms of action of these two classes of medication, as well as the experimental and clinical evidence that they slow the progression of renal disease.     

The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor rosuvastatin and the angiotensin receptor antagonist candesartan attenuate atherosclerosis in an apolipoprotein E-deficient mouse model of diabetes via effects on advanced glycation,oxidative stress and inflammation

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We evaluated the anti-atherosclerotic effect of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase inhibitor, rosuvastatin, and the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), candesartan, alone and in combination, in the streptozotocin-induced diabetic apolipoprotein E-deficient (Apoe (-/-)) mouse. METHODS: Control and streptozotocin-induced diabetic Apoe (-/-) mice received rosuvastatin (5 mg kg(-1) day(-1)), candesartan (2.5 mg kg(-1) day(-1)), dual therapy or no treatment for 20 weeks. Aortic plaque deposition was assessed by Sudan IV staining and subsequent visual quantification. The abundance of proteins was measured using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Diabetes was associated with a fourfold increase in total plaque area. Rosuvastatin attenuated plaque area in diabetic mice in the absence of lipid-lowering effects. The anti-atherosclerotic effect of rosuvastatin was comparable to that observed with candesartan. A similar beneficial effect was seen with dual therapy, although it was not superior to monotherapy. Rosuvastatin treatment was associated with attenuated accumulation of AGE and AGE receptor (RAGE) in plaques. Similar beneficial effects on markers of oxidative stress were seen with the ARB and statin. Candesartan was more effective at reducing macrophage accumulation and collagen I abundance in plaques compared with rosuvastatin. The combined effect of candesartan and rosuvastatin was superior in reducing macrophage infiltration, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 level, vascular AGE accumulation and RAGE abundance in the vascular wall. Furthermore, the combination tended to be more effective in reducing smooth muscle cell infiltration and connective tissue growth factor abundance in plaques. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Rosuvastatin has direct anti-atherosclerotic effects in diabetic macrovascular disease. These effects are independent of effects on lipids and comparable to the effects observed with candesartan.     

Renal protective effects of blocking the intrarenal renin-angiotensin system: angiotensin II type I receptor antagonist compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.

The present study compared renoprotective effects of angiotensin II type I receptor antagonist (AT1RA) with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), and their influence on the renin-angiotensin-system (RAS). Experimental nephrotic syndrome was induced in SD rats by repeated peritoneal injections of puromycin. Twenty-eight rats were randomly divided into four groups: normal control, nephrotic control, ACEI-treated, and AT1RA-treated groups. Serum, urine, and renal tissue were collected for study at the end of 12 weeks. Compared with those of the nephrotic control group, urinary protein was less and renal function was better in both treated groups. The glomerular and interstitial damage indexes of both ACEI- and AT1RA-treated rats were lower than those of nephrotic control rats, with no significant difference observed between the two treated groups. Local renal ACE activity and angiotensin II concentration were elevated in nephrotic rats (p< 0.01). However, there is no significant difference in circulating RAS, renal tissue renin, and aldosterone between the normal control and nephrotic control rats. As expected, enalapril inhibited the local renal ACE activity and significantly decreased angiotensin II (p< 0.01). Intrarenal ACE activity and angiotensin concentration returned to normal levels after treatment with irbesartan (p< 0.01). In conclusion, AT1RA and ACEI have comparable renal protective effects, and these protective effects were associated with the inhibition of intrarenal ANG II.     

Tissue-specific changes of type 1 angiotensin II receptor and angiotensin-converting enzyme mRNA in angiotensinogen gene-knockout mice

This study examined whether type 1 angiotensin II receptor (AT1) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) mRNAs are regulated during dietary salt loading in angiotensinogen gene-knockout (Atg-/-) mice which are genetically deficient in endogenous production of angiotensin II. Wild-type (Atg+/+) and Atg-/- mice were fed a normal-salt (0.3% NaCl) or a high-salt (4% NaCl) diet for 2 weeks. The mRNA levels were measured by Northern blot analysis. In Atg+/+ mice, concentrations of plasma angiotensin peptides were decreased by salt loading, whereas the treatment increased the brainstem, cardiac, pulmonary, renal cortex, gastric and intestinal AT1 mRNA levels. Salt loading also enhanced renal cortex ACE mRNA levels in Atg+/+ mice. Although plasma angiotensin peptides and urinary aldosterone excretion were not detected in Atg-/- mice, salt loading increased blood pressure in Atg-/- mice. In Atg-/- mice, pulmonary, renal cortex, gastric and intestinal AT1, and renal cortex and intestinal ACE mRNA levels were higher than those in Atg+/+ mice. However, salt loading upregulated AT1 mRNA expression only in the liver of Atg-/- mice, and the treatment did not affect ACE mRNA levels in Atg-/- mice. Furthermore, although the levels of ACE enzymatic activity showed the same trend with the ACE mRNA levels in the lung, renal cortex and intestine of both Atg-/- and Atg+/+ mice, the results of radioligand binding assay showed that cardiac expression of AT1 protein was regulated differently from AT1 mRNA expression both in Atg-/- and Atg+/+ mice. Thus, expression of AT1 and ACE is regulated by salt loading in a tissue-specific manner that appears to be mediated, at least partly, by a mechanism other than changes in the circulating or tissue levels of angiotensin peptides.     

Aliskiren reduces blood pressure and suppresses plasma renin activity in combination with a thiazide diuretic, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, or an angiotensin receptor blocker

Thiazide diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers all cause reactive rises in plasma renin activity. We hypothesized that renin inhibition with aliskiren would prevent this reactive rise and also enhance blood pressure lowering. In 3 open-label studies in which blood pressure was assessed with ambulatory measurement, aliskiren was administered to patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension in combination with hydrochlorothiazide (n=23), ramipril (n=21), or irbesartan (n=23). In the diuretic combination study, the addition of 25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide to 150 mg of aliskiren daily for 3 weeks significantly lowered daytime pressure, compared with aliskiren monotherapy (systolic/diastolic mean change from baseline [SEM]: daytime: -18.4 [2.1]/ -10.6 [1.7] versus -10.4 [1.8]/-5.8 [1.4]; nighttime: -15.6 [2.7]/-8.1 [1.8] versus -8.8 [2.9]/-5.0 [2.2]). In the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor combination study, the addition of 75 or 150 mg of aliskiren to 5 mg of ramipril alone for 3 weeks further lowered both daytime and nighttime pressures compared with ramipril monotherapy (daytime: -10.5 [2.9]/-8.1 [2.1] and -14 [3.7]/-8.7 [2.3] versus -6.1 [2.4]/-5.9 [1.5]; nighttime: -8.1 [2.6]/-5.3 [2.4] and -9.6 [3.4]/-5.3 [2.4] versus -2 [2.3]/-0.7 [2.2]). In the angiotensin receptor blocker combination study, the addition of 75 or 150 mg of aliskiren to 150 mg of irbesartan alone, for 3 weeks, resulted in significantly lower nighttime pressures compared with irbesartan monotherapy (daytime: -14.8 [2]/-8.2 [1.3] and -13.3 [1.6]/-6.8 [0.9] versus -11.4 [1.6]/-6.5 [1.1]; nighttime: -16.1 [2.4]/-8.6 [1.7] and -13.2 [2.7]/-7.2 [1.9] versus -9.0 [2.5]/-4.7 [1.9]). Aliskiren (150 mg) alone significantly inhibited plasma renin activity by 65% (P<0.0001). Ramipril and irbesartan monotherapy caused 90% and 175% increases in plasma renin activity, respectively. By contrast, when aliskiren was coadministered with hydrochlorothiazide, ramipril, or irbesartan, plasma renin activity did not increase but remained similar to baseline levels or was decreased (combination therapy versus untreated; median [interquartile range]; aliskiren and hydrochlorothiazide: 0.4 [0.2 to 1.1] versus 0.7 [0.5 to 1.3]; ramipril and aliskiren: 0.5 [0.3 to 0.9] versus 0.6 [0.5 to 0.8]; irbesartan and aliskiren: 0.4 [0.2 to 0.9] versus 0.6 [0.4 to 0.9]). These results suggest that renin inhibition with aliskiren in these combinations increases renin-angiotensin system suppression, improves 24-hour blood pressure control, and may ultimately provide better end-organ protection in patients with hypertension.     

Angiotensin converting enzyme gene polymorphism predicts blood pressure response to angiotensin II receptor type 1 antagonist treatment in hypertensive patients

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether polymorphisms in the renin-angiotensin system can predict blood pressure-lowering response to antihypertensive treatment; more specifically, in response to treatment with irbesartan or atenolol. DESIGN AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients with hypertension were randomized to double-blind treatment with either the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist irbesartan or the beta1 adrenergic receptor blocker atenolol and followed for 3 months. We analysed angiotensinogen T174M and M235T, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) I/D and angiotensin II type 1 receptor A1166C polymorphisms and related them to blood pressure reduction. RESULTS: The mean reductions in blood pressure were similar for both treatments. In the irbesartan group, individuals homozygous for the ACE gene I allele showed a greater reduction in diastolic blood pressure, exceeding those with the D allele (-18 +/- 11 SD versus -7 +/- 10 mmHg, P = 0.0096). This was not the case during treatment with atenolol, and the interaction term between type of treatment and ACE II genotype was significant (P = 0.0176). The angiotensinogen and angiotensin II type 1 receptor polymorhisms were not related to the response to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: ACE genotyping predicted the blood pressure-lowering response to antihypertensive treatment with irbesartan but not atenolol. Thus, specific genotypes might predict the response to specific antihypertensive treatment.     

Effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist on metabolism and contraction in ischemia-reperfused rabbit heart

The effect of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, temocaprilat and/or angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist, CV-11974 on myocardial metabolism and contraction during ischemia and reperfusion was examined by phosphorus 31-nuclear magnetic resonance (31P-NMR) in Langendorff rabbit hearts. After normothermic 15 min global ischemia, postischemic reperfusion of 60min was carried out. Temocaprilat and/or CV-11974 were administered from 40 min prior to the global ischemia. Adenosine triphosphate (ATP), creatine phosphate (PCr), inorganic phosphate (Pi), intracellular pH (pHi), left ventricular developed pressure (LVDevP), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and coronary flow were measured. Twenty-eight hearts were divided into 4 experimental groups consisting of 7 hearts each: group I consisted of controls, group II was perfused with temocaprilat (10(-6)mol/L), group III was perfused with CV-11974 (10(-6)mol/L), and group IV was perfused with temocaprilat (10(-6)mol/L) in combination with CV-11974 (10(-6) mol/L). Groups II and III showed a significant (p<0.05) inhibition of an overshoot phenomenon of PCr during postischemic reperfusion compared with group I. Group IV also showed a more pronounced significant (p<0.01) inhibition of the overshoot of PCr during reperfusion compared with group I. Groups II, III and IV showed a significant (p<0.05) inhibition of the decrease in ATP during global ischemia (59+/-2, 54+/-3 and 54+/-7%, respectively) compared with group I (45+/-3%). Groups II and IV showed a significant (p<0.05) early recovery of ATP during reperfusion (81+/-2, 80+/-6%) compared with group I (71+/-3%) and group II (73+/-2%). Group IV showed no more significant recovery in ATP than group III. There were no differences in LVDevP, LVEDP and coronary flow among these groups. In conclusion, temocaprilat in combination with CV-11974 has significant potential for improving myocardial energy metabolism during both myocardial ischemia and reperfusion.