Clinical biomarkers of response in advanced renal cell carcinoma

There are now a range of effective targeted agents available for the first- and second-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, patients with advanced RCC have varied responses to therapy; some experience long-term responses while others may not respond, or even progress rapidly. Characteristics or markers that could be used to determine which patients will benefit most from which agent may enable us to select the optimal treatment of each individual patient, thereby improving efficacy and avoiding unnecessary toxic effects. These characteristics may be at the cellular or genetic level. Alternatively, the occurrence of adverse events may act as surrogate markers of a drug's on treatment activity, enabling prediction of outcomes during treatment. Recently, it has been suggested that during some targeted therapy for advanced RCC, the occurrence of specific adverse events, such as hypertension, hypothyroidism, hand–foot syndrome or fatigue/asthenia, may be associated with improved efficacy. This article reviews the evidence supporting clinical biomarkers in patients with advanced RCC receiving targeted agents. We also consider how these clinical biomarkers may affect the future management of patients with advanced RCC.     

Indications for surgery in advanced/metastatic GIST

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are a relatively rare entity and often present as a locally advanced tumour or with metastatic disease. Complete surgical resection is the only means of cure in localised disease; however, imatinib therapy has greatly advanced the management of GIST and is established as both an adjunct to surgery in high-risk cases and as principle therapy in metastatic disease. Surgery in advanced GIST has undergone a renaissance in recent years with the potential for a combined treatment approach with either neoadjuvant imatinib in locally advanced primary disease or as an adjunct to imatinib in those with metastases or recurrent disease. Neoadjuvant imatinib can render a locally advanced primary GIST resectable, allow less invasive procedures or promote preservation of function, especially if the tumour is located in an anatomically difficult position. The role of surgery in metastatic or recurrent disease is more controversial and case selection is critical. The potential benefit is difficult to quantify, although surgery may have a limited favourable impact on progression-free survival and overall survival for those patients whose disease is responding to imatinib or those with limited focal progression. Patients with imatinib resistant disease should not be offered surgery unless as an emergency where palliative intervention may be justified.     

Current Algorithms and Prognostic Factors in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is highly resistant to chemotherapy but responds modestly to cytokine therapy. The prognosis for longterm survival is poor. Approximately 10% of patients who present with metastatic disease or relapse after nephrectomy are alive at 5 years. Identification of prognostic or predictive factors for individual patient outcomes is necessary in order to develop tailored treatments that reduce the risk of relapse and enhance the chance of successful management. The relationship between pretreatment clinical features and survival has been evaluated in studies leading to the creation of a Memorial Sloan- Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) risk model. Additionally, the cloning of the von Hippel—Lindau tumor suppressor gene, and the elucidation of its role in upregulating growth factors associated with angiogenesis, has provided insight into RCC biology and defined a series of targets for novel therapeutic agents. These targeted agents, including sunitinib, sorafenib, temsirolimus, everolimus, and bevacizumab plus interferon-α, have shown benefit in phase III trials in first- and second-line therapy. Analysis of the data from these trials and use of prognostic models have resulted in a new paradigm for the treatment of metastatic RCC. Herein, we review these targeted agents, the MSKCC risk model, and the new paradigm for treatment of metastatic RCC.     

Development of treatment strategies in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (take home messages)

In the last decade combined modality treatment approaches contributed to the progress of therapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. With this management strategies younger patients (<70 years) with locally advanced disease and a good performance status (ECOG 0,1) have survival benefits compared to sole locoregional treatment. Further development of these treatment concepts is warranted. To adopt optimal tailored therapy to prognostic consistent patient groups exact staging of disease is mandatory. Moreover, refinements of the staging system would be helpful to identify in defined anatomical stages, patient subgroups who will benefit from systemic treatment options different from chemotherapy (i.e. tyrosine kinase-inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor family, anti-angiogenic treatment). The current status of developing treatment strategies in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer is discussed.     

Optimizing treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

With the advent of targeted antiangiogenic therapies for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the prognosis for patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease has significantly improved. Indeed, the results of several randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that targeted therapies, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), provide superior efficacy and tolerability compared with traditional cytokine-based treatments. However, TKI therapy is still associated with significant toxicities related to off-target inhibition that are detrimental to patient quality of life. The results of ongoing head-to-head trials will determine how these agents compare with each other in terms of efficacy, and whether TKIs that interact with fewer off-target kinases have improved tolerability profiles. Furthermore, examining how these agents could be integrated with surgery to provide a multimodal approach to the treatment of metastatic RCC could further improve the outlook for RCC patients.     

Optimizing treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

With the advent of targeted antiangiogenic therapies for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the prognosis for patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease has significantly improved. Indeed, the results of several randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that targeted therapies, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), provide superior efficacy and tolerability compared with traditional cytokine-based treatments. However, TKI therapy is still associated with significant toxicities related to off-target inhibition that are detrimental to patient quality of life. The results of ongoing head-to-head trials will determine how these agents compare with each other in terms of efficacy, and whether TKIs that interact with fewer off-target kinases have improved tolerability profiles. Furthermore, examining how these agents could be integrated with surgery to provide a multimodal approach to the treatment of metastatic RCC could further improve the outlook for RCC patients.     

The combined administration of partially HLA-matched irradiated allogeneic lymphocytes and thalidomide in advanced renal-cell carcinoma: a case report

Renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) is susceptible to immune therapy including the use of the nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplantation (NST). However, NST can produce severe toxicity, might not be appropriate for many patients with metastatic RCC. Other novel allogeneic immunotherapies are designed to induce an autologous immune response directed against the malignancy. In single-arm phase II trials, thalidomide has demonstrated a modest activity in the treatment of advanced RCC. Here we present a case report in which a patient with advanced RCC in the absence of transplant conditioning, that was receiving thalidomide, was infused with partially HLA-matched irradiated allogeneic lymphocytes. In this patient a complete response with weak acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was observed. No evidence of the disease was present over the subsequent 36 months survival of the patient, suggesting that the infusions may have played a major role in the antineoplastic effect. A potential mechanism of this protocol may involve a host-versus-graft reactions-mediated antitumor effect against the malignancy. In addition, the present results suggest that a combination protocol with alternate treatment (e.g., chemotherapy) schedules merit further investigation in the management of various malignancies.     

The High-Dose Aldesleukin (IL-2) “Select” Trial: A Trial Designed to Prospectively Validate Predictive Models of Response to High-Dose IL-2 Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

For patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the prognosis is poor. Despite the recent approval of drugs such as sorafenib, sunitinib, and temsirolimus, durable remissions of metastatic disease are rare. This is largely due to the fact that these drugs, while effective, do not result in the eradication of disease. In 1992, the FDA approved the use of high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) for the treatment of patients with metastatic RCC because of a small number of patients that achieved durable responses. However, IL-2 has not become a mainstay of treatment because of the expense and toxicity associated with this therapy. This review article discusses a phase II trial that investigates predictive biomarkers that might help clinicians identify the patient population with metastatic RCC that would benefit from IL-2 therapy and therefore limit patients who receive this toxic therapy to those most likely to benefit.     

Management of renal cell carcinoma

Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of management for localized renal cell carcinoma. No effective postsurgical adjuvant therapy has been established for patients with locally advanced disease who are at high risk for recurrence. The effective treatment of metastatic kidney cancer remains a challenge. Immunologic therapy with cytokines, such as interferon-alfa (Intron A, Roferon-A) and interleukin-2 (IL-2 [Proleukin]), benefit relatively small numbers of patients. Preclinical research and clinical investigations aimed at identifying new agents and treatment programs with improved antitumor activity against metastases remain the highest priorities in this refractory disease. New immunologic approaches to the treatment of both advanced and high-risk postsurgical disease are focusing on novel vaccine therapies to target both renal epithelial and vascular antigens.     

Intraoperative radiation therapy in the management of gynecologic and genitourinary malignancies

Women with locally advanced primary or recurrent gynecologic malignancies have a poor prognosis. The doses of external radiation necessary to treat gross or microscopic recurrent disease in patients previously irradiated exceed the doses tolerated by normal tissue [1,3-5]. IORT has been added to the treatment armamentarium in this group of patients to maximize local control and minimize the radiation exposure to dose-limiting surrounding structures. In addition, IORT may improve the long-term local control and the overall survival rates in women with pelvic sidewall or para-aortic nodal recurrence [1,4,5]. The most encouraging results are seen in cases of microscopic residual disease following surgical debulking [4,6]. In gynecologic malignancies, IORT has served to reiterate the importance of optimal surgical resection. Higher 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates have been documented in women who have microscopic residual disease, compared with those who have gross residual disease [1,3-6]. IORT in the management of GU malignancies has not been used extensively. In RCC, where surgery alone often results in suboptimal treatment results, IORT seems to be well tolerated and controls local disease [2,27,29,30]. Because of the chemoresistant nature of RCC, IORT may play an important role in the future in the management of locally advanced and recurrent RCC. In bladder cancer, IORT had been used in combination with chemotherapy and EBRT, as part of bladder-sparing protocols. The data suggest that IORT in this patient population is also well tolerated, and may become more widely used as less radical surgical procedures gain clinical importance. IORT in the treatment of prostate and testicular cancers has not been used frequently, given the highly efficacious treatment modalities currently available to treat these malignancies. A review of institutional experiences with IORT may allow the establishment of guidelines for patient selection. These criteria, in turn, may be useful in the design of clinical trials. The construction, execution, and evaluation of clinical trials are mandatory to adequately assess the role of IORT in the treatment of patients with gynecologic and GU malignancies.     

Disease progression following imatinib failure in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: role of surgical therapy

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) represent the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the GI tract. The optimal management of GISTs has been evolving rapidly over the past 5 years and depends on proper histopathologic and radiologic diagnosis as well as appropriate multidisciplinary medical and surgical treatments. Complete surgical resection of primary localized GIST with negative margins remains the best therapeutic option today. In the setting of locally advanced or metastatic disease, imatinib mesylate has emerged as the initial treatment of choice, administered either as cytoreductive or as definitive treatment. Surgery or ablative modalities in this setting are becoming increasingly employed, particularly when all disease becomes amenable to gross resection or destruction, or to manage complications arising from the disease following imatinib failure. We report on the surgical management of an unusual and clinically significant complication following progression of disease secondary to imatinib resistance. The role of surgical therapy in the management of GIST complications following resistance to imatinib and the integration of surgical and molecular therapy of locally advanced or metastatic GISTs are discussed.     

Surgical management of renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a relatively rare malignancy, although the incidence appears to be increasing. RCC remains resistant to chemotherapy and curative therapy is limited to surgical resection of localized tumors. Recently there has been an expansion of the indications for nephron sparing approaches to patients with localized tumors. Likewise, the management of locally advanced tumors and the indications for cytoreductive surgery in the setting of metastatic RCC have been clarified by recent studies. Herein, we discuss the role of surgery for the management of localized and metastatic RCC.     

Gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: final results of a GERCOR multicenter phase II study.

PURPOSE: Based on preclinical in vitro synergy data, this study evaluated the activity and toxicity of a gemcitabine/oxaliplatin combination in patients with metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated metastatic and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients were enrolled onto this multicenter phase II study. Patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) as a 10-mg/m(2)/min infusion on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion on day 2 every 2 weeks. Patients with metastatic disease were treated until evidence of progressive disease, whereas patients with locally advanced disease received six cycles in the absence of progression, followed when appropriate by concomitant radiochemotherapy. RESULTS: Among 64 eligible patients included in eight centers, 30 had locally advanced and 34 had metastatic disease. Response rate for the 62 patients with measurable disease was 30.6% (95% confidence interval, 19.7% to 42.3%), 31.0% for locally advanced and 30.3% for metastatic patients. Among 58 assessable patients, 40% had clinical benefit. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival (OS) were 5.3 and 9.2 months, respectively, with 36% of patients alive at 1 year. Median OS for patients with metastatic disease and locally advanced disease were 8.7 and 11.5 months, respectively. With 574 treatment cycles (median per patient, nine; range, zero to 27), grade 3/4 toxicity per patient was 11% for neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, 14% for nausea or vomiting, 6.2% for diarrhea, and 11% for peripheral neuropathy, with no toxic deaths. CONCLUSION: Palliative effects, response rate, and survival observed with this well-tolerated gemcitabine/oxaliplatin combination deserve additional evaluation. A comparative study of combination therapy versus gemcitabine alone is ongoing.     

The role of surgery in the multidisciplinary management of patients with localized gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Surgical resection of localized gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is associated with recurrence rates of approximately 50% at 5 years of follow-up. The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as imatinib, improved overall survival rates in advanced disease, while in the adjuvant setting, improved recurrence-free survival following resection of high-risk GIST. The demonstration of the clinical benefit of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in both the metastatic and adjuvant settings generated interest in neoadjuvant approaches for patients with operable locally advanced disease, particularly in difficult anatomic locations. The potential impact of tumor downsizing in areas such as the gastroesophageal junction, the duodenum or the rectum, on the extent of surgical resection and morbidity is real. The ongoing research regarding neoadjuvant therapy, the duration of adjuvant therapy and the optimal means by which to risk stratify patients with GIST continues to keep the treatment of this disease at the forefront of personalized cancer care.     

A rapid and systemic complete response to stereotactic body radiation therapy and pembrolizumab in a patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of local tumor would induce an abscopal effect that has been observed in several kinds of human cancers; one important mechanism may involve the improved activation of the host immune system. The immune checkpoint inhibitor can overcome immune tolerance and enhance the activation of antitumor T cells. The combined treatment of SBRT and checkpoint inhibitor may represent a new promising therapeutic approach. Herein, we reported a patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with concurrent SBRT and anti-PD-1 antibody, pembrolizumab, by which the patient achieved an amazingly systemic complete response in only 2.2 months after starting treatment. This case report indicates that the advanced RCC may benefit from the combining treatment of local SBRT and PD-1 inhibitor and provide a useful paradigm worthy of establishing a clinical trial for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.     

Current options for the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma: focus on sunitinib

Recent developments in molecular biology have increased our understanding of the biology and genetics of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and identified pathways for novel targeted therapy. Several targeted therapies are now available that show promising activity in this disease. Sunitinib, an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has recently been approved for first-line treatment of metastatic RCC (mRCC) and is the new reference standard for the treatment of clear-cell disease. Three other promising TKIs are temsirolimus, approved for the treatment of advanced RCC, sorafenib, approved for the treatment of patients with advanced RCC who have failed or are considered unsuitable for cytokine therapy and bevacizumab, effective in combination with immunotherapy for first-line therapy of mRCC. Several other agents are under investigation as single-agent or combination therapy for mRCC. These include the TKIs axitinib, pazopanib, everolimus, erlotinib, gefitinib and lapatinib. Use of these agents is leading to the development of treatment paradigms that will transform the management of mRCC.     

Palliative radiation therapy

Radiation is an effective modality to aid in symptom management of patients with metastatic disease. The type and duration of treatment depends on the Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of the patient and type and status of the cancer. Abbreviated treatment regimens may be favored in this patient population. They provide quick palliation without the patient and family spending significant time traveling back and forth to the treatment center. Hypofractionated regimens have been found effective in relieving pain from metastatic bone disease, relieving obstruction from locally advanced lung cancer, bleeding from gynecologic cancers, and hematuria from advanced bladder cancer. More aggressive regimens such as whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery may be appropriate for select patients with a good KPS. Radiation has also been found to be effective in palliating recurrent cancer that has already received definitive radiation.     

The Role of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Renal Cell Carcinoma with Sarcomatoid Histology: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

Background: Renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation represents a rare histological entity characterized by aggressive behavior, limited efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors or mTOR inhibitors, and poor outcome. The immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy regimen combining ipilimumab with nivolumab represents a new standard of care for this patient population due to a hitherto unprecedented response rate and overall survival. On the other hand, the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma, in particular, with sarcomatoid histology, remains controversial. Patient and Methods: In the present case series, we report six patients with locally advanced or synchronous metastatic sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma and intermediate or poor International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk score, five of whom were successfully subjected to cytoreductive nephrectomy. Results: All six patients received the combination regimen of ipilimumab with nivolumab. Five of these patients underwent upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy followed by systemic treatment without any significant delay, with a durable treatment outcome. Notably, two patients with poor prognostic features achieved a long-term major partial response to therapy. We also performed a review of the literature on optimal treatment strategies for patients with sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma. Conclusion: Herein, we highlight the feasibility of performing cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with intermediate/poor prognosis metastatic renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation followed by immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab. To enhance the chances of immunotherapy success, cytoreductive nephrectomy should also be considered for patients presenting with a disease with adverse prognostic parameters.     

Léiomyosarcomes utérins : épidémiologie,histologie, biologie,diagnostic, pronostic et traitement

Uterine leiomyosarcoma is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. The rarity of this tumor needs a specialized management in tertiary reference centers in order to provide patients with optimal diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic care. The pathological diagnosis relies on the presence of three characteristics in proliferating smooth muscle cells: necrosis, cytologic atypia and mitosis. Despite progress in the knowledge of the biology of these tumors, no oncogenic driver has been found. Prognosis depends mainly on the age of the patient, race, FIGO stage, mitotic index and hormonal receptor expression in the tumor. Surgery is one of the cornerstones of management and cytotoxic chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment in metastatic disease with a potential role in the adjuvant setting. In locally advanced or metastatic disease, prognosis is poor with a median overall survival of about 12 to 14 months despite a 30% response rate to polychemotherapy regimens. Anti-angiogenics and hormonal therapy have a role to play in the setting of metastatic disease. It is mandatory to include such patients in clinical trials aiming to improve the therapeutic management of these patients. Multimodal therapy can improve the prognosis of selected patients too.     

The role of second-line chemotherapy after gemcitabine failure in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

Systemic chemotherapy with single-agent gemcitabine or a gemcitabine-based regimen still remains a standard of care for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. To date, no standard treatment approach for patients that show progressive disease during gemcitabine therapy is defined. Several clinical trials have evaluated the safety and efficacy of second-line chemotherapy after gemcitabine failure in this patient population. Based on the currently available data, there is increasing evidence that selected patients may derive clinical benefit from salvage chemotherapy, also with regard to survival. However, results from large randomized Phase III trials are still lacking and therefore no evidence-based treatment recommendation can be given for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer after failure of first-line gemcitabine.