Photofrin uptake in the tumor and normal tissues of patients receiving intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy.

PURPOSE: A phase II trial of Photofrin-mediated i.p. photodynamic therapy shown in a previous report limited efficacy and significant acute, but not chronic, toxicity. A secondary aim of this trial and the subject of this report is to determine Photofrin uptake in tumor and normal tissues. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients received Photofrin, 2.5 mg/kg, i.v., 48 hours before debulking surgery. Photofrin uptake was measured by spectroflurometric analysis of drug extracted from tumor and normal tissues removed at surgery. Differences in drug uptake among these tissues were statistically considered using mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Photofrin concentration was measured in 301 samples collected from 58 of 100 patients enrolled on the trial. In normal tissues, drug uptake significantly (P<0.0001) differed as a function of seven different tissue types. In the toxicity-limiting tissue of intestine, the model-based mean (SE) Photofrin level was 2.70 ng/mg (0.32 ng/mg) and 3.42 ng/mg (0.24 ng/mg) in full-thickness large and small intestine, respectively. In tumors, drug uptake significantly (P=0.0015) differed as a function of patient cohort: model-based mean Photofrin level was 3.32 to 5.31 ng/mg among patients with ovarian, gastric, or small bowel cancer; 2.09 to 2.45 ng/mg among patients with sarcoma and appendiceal or colon cancer; and 0.93 ng/mg in patients with pseudomyxoma. Ovarian, gastric, and small bowel cancers showed significantly higher Photofrin uptake than full-thickness large and/or small intestine. However, the ratio of mean drug level in tumor versus intestine was modest (相似文献   

Hypoxia and Photofrin uptake in the intraperitoneal carcinomatosis and sarcomatosis of photodynamic therapy patients.

PURPOSE: Response to photodynamic therapy depends on adequate tumor oxygenation as well as sufficient accumulation of photosensitizer in the tumor. The goal of this study was to investigate the presence of hypoxia and retention of the photosensitizer Photofrin in the tumors of patients with intra-abdominal carcinomatosis or sarcomatosis. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Tumor nodules from 10 patients were studied. In nine of these patients, hypoxia was identified in histological sections of biopsied tumor after administration of the hypoxia marker 2-(2-nitroimidazol-1[H]-yl)-N-(2,2,3,3,3-pentafluoropropyl)acetamide (EF5). In separate tumor nodules from 10 patients, Photofrin uptake was measured by fluorescence after tissue solubilization. RESULTS: Hypoxia existed in the tumors of five patients, with three of these patients demonstrating at least one severely hypoxic nodule. Physiological levels of oxygen were present in the tumors of four patients. An association between tumor size and hypoxia was not evident because some tumor nodules as small as approximately 2 mm in diameter were severely hypoxic. However, even these tumor nodules contained vascular networks. Three patients with severely hypoxic tumor nodules exhibited moderate levels of Photofrin uptake of 3.9 +/- 0.4 to 3.9 +/- 0.5 ng/mg (mean +/- SE). The four patients with tumors of physiological oxygenation did not consistently exhibit high tumor concentrations of Photofrin: mean +/- SE drug uptake among these patients ranged from 0.6 +/- 0.8 to 5.8 +/- 0.5 ng/mg. CONCLUSIONS: Carcinomatosis or sarcomatosis of the i.p. cavity may exhibit severe tumor hypoxia. Photofrin accumulation in tumors varied by a factor of approximately 10x among all patients, and, on average, those with severe hypoxia in at least one nodule did not demonstrate poor Photofrin uptake in separate tumor samples. These data emphasize the need for reconsideration of the generally accepted paradigm of small tumor size, good oxygenation, and good drug delivery because this may vary on an individual tumor basis.     

Patterns of recurrence in patients treated with photodynamic therapy for intraperitoneal carcinomatosis and sarcomatosis

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the patterns of recurrence in patients treated with Photofrin-mediated intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy (IP PDT). Sixty-six patients with gastrointestinal cancers, ovarian cancers, and sarcomas have been enrolled to date and 51 patients underwent IP PDT. Photofrin, 2.5 mg/kg, was administered intravenously 48 h prior to surgical debulking and intraoperative light treatment. Forty-five, and 49 patients were evaluable for response rates, and patterns of recurrence, respectively. Response to treatment was evaluated by CT or MRI scans of the abdomen and pelvis every 3 months. Patterns of recurrence were determined by evaluating the abdomen as a combination of different treatment regions. Of the 51 patients enrolled and treated with IP PDT two are alive without evidence of recurrence. Eleven of 45 patients showed no evidence of recurrence 3 months after treatment. No evidence of recurrence was noted in 7/17 sarcoma patients, 2 of 13 ovarian cancer patients, and 2 of 15 gastrointestinal cancer patients. The most common site of recurrence as determined by radiographs was the pelvis, which was noted in 19 of 49 (39%) patients. The presence of gross residual disease before light treatment (as determined by the attending surgeon) did not affect the site of recurrence. When studying those patients who had only locoregional recurrence, 9 of 33 evaluated radiographically and 10 of 24 evaluated operatively recurred only in peritoneal areas not previously involved with gross disease. The pelvis was the site with the highest rate of recurrence after IP PDT. A significant minority of patients recurred only in sites not previously involved with gross disease. Patients with gross residual disease before light therapy had similar recurrence rates to those without gross residual disease. Since sites involved with gross residual tumor often received boost doses of light, this could suggest a dose-response relationship for IP PDT.     

Pegylation of a chlorin(e6) polymer conjugate increases tumor targeting of photosensitizer

Photodynamic therapy is emerging as a viable modality for the treatment of many cancers. A limiting factor in its use against intracavity tumors such as disseminated ovarian cancer is insufficient selectivity of the photosensitizer for tumor compared with normal tissue. We report on an approach to improve tumor targeting by exploiting differences between cell types and by chemical modification of a photosensitizer conjugate. Attachment of polyethylene glycol (pegylation) to a polyacetylated conjugate between poly-l-lysine and chlorin(e6) increased the relative phototoxicity in vitro toward an ovarian cancer cell line (OVCAR-5) while reducing it toward a macrophage cell line (J774), compared with the nonpegylated conjugate. Surprisingly, the increased phototoxicity of the pegylated conjugate correlated with reduced oxygen consumption. Pegylation also reduced the tendency of the conjugate to aggregate and reduced the consumption of oxygen when the conjugates were illuminated in solution in serum containing medium, suggesting a switch in photochemical mechanism from type II (singlet oxygen) to type I (radicals or electron transfer). Pegylation led to more mitochondrial localization as shown by confocal fluorescence microscopy in OVCAR-5 cells, and, on illumination, produced a switch in cell death mechanism toward apoptosis not seen with J774 cells. Conjugates were injected i.p. into nude mice bearing i.p. OVCAR-5 tumors, and the pegylated conjugate gave higher amounts of photosensitizer in tumor and higher tumor:normal tissue ratios and increased the depth to which the chlorin(e6) penetrated into the peritoneal wall. Taken together, these results suggest that pegylation of a polymer-photosensitizer conjugate improves tumor-targeting and may increase the efficacy of photodynamic therapy for ovarian cancer.     

Radiation therapy combined with photofrin or 5-ALA: effect on Lewis sarcoma tumor lines implanted in mice. Preliminary results

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Ionizing irradiation is a well-established therapeutic modality for cancer. Photodynamic therapy (PDT), especially with 5-ALA and Photofrin, is highly effective in some tumor types. Chemical modifiers, so-called radiosensitizers, are used in order to increase the efficacy of radiotherapy. Most of the known and routinely used radiosensitizers are not tumor selective, so that the normal tissue reaction toxicity is also increased. In the present study we investigated whether a porphyrin derivative that is currently used as a tumor-photosensitizing agent in photodynamic therapy (PDT) may also act as a tumor-specific radiosensitizer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For our investigation we used Balb/c mice implanted with Lewis sarcoma and irradiated with 3 Gy combined with injection of 5-ALA or Photofrin at various concentrations before irradiation. RESULTS: 5-ALA had no effect as a radiosensitizer at any of the concentrations examined. Photofrin at a concentration of 5 mg/kg proved to be a chemical modifier of ionizing radiation, delaying tumor growth and reducing the overall tumor volume by about 50% after six days. CONCLUSION: Photofrin has marked efficacy as a radiosensitizer and can be used in the future as a selective tumor radiosensitizer.     

Vascularity and uptake of photosensitizer in small human tumor nodules: implications for intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy.

PURPOSE: i.p. spread of cancers is a common clinical problem, with limited treatment options leading to morbidity and death. i.p. photodynamic therapy (IP-PDT) combines maximal surgical debulking of gross tumor with intraoperative light delivery to the peritoneum after preoperative i.v. injection of photosensitizer to treat residual disease. An issue of concern in IP-PDT is the potential lack of photosensitizer uptake by residual small tumor nodules (STNs) < or =5 mm in maximum diameter and by microscopic residual disease caused by incomplete development of a vascular supply. This study examined the existence of vasculature and Photofrin (PF) uptake in STNs in 12 patients in a Phase II clinical trial for IP-PDT. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients received PF 2.5 mg/kg i.v. 48 h before surgery. STNs obtained during surgery were cryosectioned, immunostained for platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1, and analyzed by light microscopy. Mean vascular densities in STNs were determined by counting microvessels within a x200 field (0.28 mm(2) area). Sections were also examined for PF uptake by fluorescence image analysis using an epifluorescence microscope and IPLab Spectrum software. RESULTS: Data obtained showed that tumors as small as 1 mm in diameter stained positive for platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 and contained PF. A negative control from a patient not given PF showed no detectable fluorescence. The average of all mean vascular densities in STNs was determined to be 100 +/- 29. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that STNs, as small as 1 mm in diameter, have a functional vasculature, because these tumors show PF uptake after i.v. delivery. Both properties are crucial for the treatment of residual STNs by IP-PDT after surgical debulking.     

Vascular targeted nanoparticles for imaging and treatment of brain tumors.

PURPOSE: Development of new therapeutic drug delivery systems is an area of significant research interest. The ability to directly target a therapeutic agent to a tumor site would minimize systemic drug exposure, thus providing the potential for increasing the therapeutic index. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involves the uptake of a sensitizer by the cancer cells followed by photoirradiation to activate the sensitizer. PDT using Photofrin has certain disadvantages that include prolonged cutaneous photosensitization. Delivery of nanoparticles encapsulated with photodynamic agent specifically to a tumor site could potentially overcome the drawbacks of systemic therapy. In this study, we have developed a multifunctional polymeric nanoparticle consisting of a surface-localized tumor vasculature targeting F3 peptide and encapsulated PDT and imaging agents. RESULTS: The nanoparticles specifically bound to the surface of MDA-435 cells in vitro and were internalized conferring photosensitivity to the cells. Significant magnetic resonance imaging contrast enhancement was achieved in i.c. rat 9L gliomas following i.v. nanoparticle administration. Serial magnetic resonance imaging was used for determination of pharmacokinetics and distribution of nanoparticles within the tumor. Treatment of glioma-bearing rats with targeted nanoparticles followed by PDT showed a significant improvement in survival rate when compared with animals who received PDT after administration of nontargeted nanoparticles or systemic Photofrin. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals the versatility and efficacy of the multifunctional nanoparticle for the targeted detection and treatment of cancer.     

Tumor vascular microenvironment determines responsiveness to photodynamic therapy

The efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) depends upon the delivery of both photosensitizing drug and oxygen. In this study, we hypothesized that local vascular microenvironment is a determinant of tumor response to PDT. Tumor vascularization and its basement membrane (collagen) were studied as a function of supplementation with basement membrane matrix (Matrigel) at the time of tumor cell inoculation. Effects on vascular composition with consequences to tumor hypoxia, photosensitizer uptake, and PDT response were measured. Matrigel-supplemented tumors developed more normalized vasculature, composed of smaller and more uniformly spaced blood vessels than their unsupplemented counterparts, but these changes did not affect tumor oxygenation or PDT-mediated direct cytotoxicity. However, PDT-induced vascular damage increased in Matrigel-supplemented tumors, following an affinity of the photosensitizer Photofrin for collagen-containing vascular basement membrane coupled with increased collagen content in these tumors. The more highly collagenated tumors showed more vascular congestion and ischemia after PDT, along with a higher probability of curative outcome that was collagen dependent. In the presence of photosensitizer-collagen localization, PDT effects on collagen were evidenced by a decrease in its association with vessels. Together, our findings show that photosensitizer localization to collagen increases vascular damage and improves treatment efficacy in tumors with greater collagen content. The vascular basement membrane is thus identified to be a determinant of therapeutic outcome in PDT of tumors.     

Photofrin-mediated photodynamic therapy induces vascular occlusion and apoptosis in a human sarcoma xenograft model.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involves light activation of a photosensitizer, resulting in oxygen-dependent, free radical-mediated cell death. Little is known about the efficacy of PDT in treating human sarcomas, despite an ongoing clinical trial treating i.p. sarcomatosis. The present study evaluates PDT treatment of a human sarcoma xenograft in nude mice and explores the mechanism of PDT-mediated antitumor effect. Athymic nude mice, 6-8 weeks of age, were s.c. injected with 5 x 10(6) cells of the A673 human sarcoma cell line. Tumors were allowed to grow to a diameter of about 10 mm. Photofrin (PF), 10 mg/kg, was injected by tail vein, and 24 h later, 630 nm light was delivered to the tumor with fluences of 50, 100, 150, or 300 J/cm2 at a fluence rate of 250 mW/cm2. To assess the efficacy of PDT in the treatment of sarcomas, photosensitizer uptake/retention studies and dose-response studies were performed. Studies carried out to determine the mechanism of tumor response included tumor temperature measurements before, during, and after treatment; tumor vascular perfusion studies with laser Doppler; electron microscopic analysis of tumor sections for vascular occlusion; and analysis of tumor cryosections for endothelial cell damage, apoptosis, and necrosis. At all time points of analysis, photosensitizer levels were greater in tumor than in muscle. Dose-response studies showed that at 100 J/cm2, five of six mice had a complete response to treatment, one of six had a partial response, and no deaths occurred. Temperature measurements indicated that thermal injury did not contribute to tumor response. Vascular perfusion studies demonstrated a significant reduction in blood flow as early as 6 h after PDT. Electron micrographs revealed erythrostasis in tumor microvessels starting as early as 2 h after treatment and complete occlusion of blood vessels by 12 h. Starting as early as 4 h after PDT, apoptosis first appeared in endothelial cells lining the occluded blood vessels and became more widespread at later time points. PDT is an effective treatment for this human sarcoma xenograft in nude mice. The mechanism of tumor destruction in this model appears to be vascular damage with initial apoptosis in tumor endothelial cells and delayed tumor cell apoptosis. This therapy may be valuable in the treatment of patients with sarcomatosis.     

Phase II study of the antiangiogenic agent SU5416 in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas.

PURPOSE: SU5416 (semaxanib) is a small molecule inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor-2 and KIT receptor tyrosine kinases. This Phase II study was conducted to investigate the safety and efficacy of SU5416 for patients with soft tissue sarcomas. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Thirteen patients with locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas were treated with SU5416 via intravenous infusion at a dose of 145 mg/m(2) twice weekly. In selected cases tumor biopsies were taken before and after 2 months of treatment. RESULTS: The median progression-free survival was 1.8 months. Median overall survival was 22.8 months. No objective tumor responses were observed. There was evidence of shorter survival among patients with high baseline urine VEGF levels (P = 0.04). No grade 4 toxicities were observed. The most common grade 3 toxicities were headache and thrombosis. Other less serious toxicities included fatigue, nausea, and abdominal pain. The median systolic blood pressure increased from 118 mmHg at baseline to 133 after 1 month of treatment (P = 0.01). Post-treatment tumor biopsies showed no significant decreases in VEGF receptor phosphorylation compared with baseline in 3 evaluable patients. One patient with gastrointestinal stromal tumor who had rapid progression during SU5416 treatment was subsequently treated with another KIT inhibitor, imatinib mesylate, and had a partial response lasting >36 months. CONCLUSIONS: SU5416 was relatively well tolerated but did not demonstrate significant antitumor activity against advanced soft tissue sarcoma. Correlative studies suggest that VEGF receptor or KIT inhibition was incomplete in at least some cases, providing a possible explanation for the observed lack of activity.     

Photodynamic therapy efficacy and tissue distribution of hypericin in a mouse P388 lymphoma tumor model

The phototherapeutic properties and tissue distribution of hypericin were investigated in DBA/2 mice bearing subcutaneously transplanted P388 lymphoma cells. The efficacy of the photodynamic therapy (PDT) 2 h after administration of hypericin (2, 5, or 20 mg/kg, i.p., 120 J/cm2, 595 nm) was substantially greater than the efficacy after a 24 h interval. PDT with Photofrin (5 mg/kg, i.p., 24-h interval, 120 J/cm2, 630 nm) showed no significant antitumoral effect. The hypericin uptake in some tissues was measured after administration of hypericin (5 or 20 mg/kg, i.p.) up to 168 h. A comparison of the distribution data and the PDT efficacy at various intervals suggests that the plasma concentration of hypericin, and to a lesser extent the tumor uptake, determines the tumor response to PDT with hypericin.     

Phase II clinical study of photodynamic therapy using mono-L-aspartyl chlorin e6 and diode laser for early superficial squamous cell carcinoma of the lung

Photofrin is the most commonly used photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy (PDT). The major side effect of Photofrin is cutaneous photosensitivity. A second generation photosensitizer, mono-L-aspartyl chlorin e6 (NPe6) has shown anti-tumor efficacy and rapid clearance from skin. Therefore, we conducted a phase II clinical study to investigate the anti-tumor effects and safety of NPe6 in patients with early superficial squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Enrollment criteria consisted of endoscopically evaluated early stage lung cancer with normal chest X-ray and CT images, no lymph node or distant metastasis. Tumors were located no more peripherally than subsegmental bronchi, the peripheral margin had to visible, and the tumor size had to not more than 2 cm in diameter. The histologic type of the tumor had to squamous cell carcinoma. Laser irradiation (100 J/cm2) using a diode laser was performed at 4 h after administration of NPe6 (40 mg/m2). Among 41 patients with 46 lesions, 40 with 45 lesions were eligible for safety evaluation, and 35 patients with 39 lesions were judged as eligible for efficacy evaluation. No serious adverse drug reactions were observed. Disappearance of skin photosensitivity was recognized within 2 weeks in 28 of 33 patients (84.8%) and in all the other seven patients first tested at 15-18 days. Complete response (CR) was seen in 84.6% of lesions (82.9% of patients). This study demonstrated excellent anti-tumor effects and safety, especially low skin photosensitivity in patients with early stage lung cancer. PDT using the second generation photosensitizer NPe6 and a diode laser will likely become a standard modality of PDT for central type early superficial squamous cell carcinoma of the lung.     

Tissue distribution and photosensitizing properties of mono-L-aspartyl chlorin e6 in a mouse tumor model

Mono-L-aspartyl chlorin e6 (NPe6) is a photosensitizer that possesses properties such as chemical purity and a major absorption band at 664 nm which are potentially exploitable for photodynamic therapy (PDT). The current investigation examined pharmacological and photosensitizing parameters of NPe6 in tumor and normal tissues in mice. [14C]NPe6 was used to obtain quantitative tissue distributions of the photosensitizer as a function of: (a) time following administration; (b) drug dose; (c) mode of drug administration; and (d) tumor size. The in vivo photosensitizing efficiency of NPe6 was compared directly to Photofrin II in experiments which evaluated tumor responses and induction of normal skin damage. Initial PDT experiments demonstrated that NPe6 was ineffective at inducing tumor cures when a 24-h time interval (between drug administration and light treatment) was used. However, PDT-induced tumor cures were obtained when NPe6 was administered 4-6 h prior to light exposure, and these NPe6-PDT treatment parameters were as effective as standard Photofrin II-mediated PDT. Interestingly, the level of PDT-induced normal skin damage was significantly greater for Photofrin II than for NPe6 at comparable drug and light doses. An analysis of pharmacological data and PDT time interval requirements suggests that plasma concentrations of NPe6 may be a more important predictive factor than tumor tissue levels of the photosensitizer for the production of PDT-mediated tumor cures. The results of this investigation indicate that NPe6 is an effective tumor photosensitizer with in vivo clearance properties that eliminate the side effect of prolonged normal skin photosensitization.     

Pretreatment photosensitizer dosimetry reduces variation in tumor response

Purpose: To compensate for photosensitizer uptake variation in photodynamic therapy (PDT), via control of delivered light dose through photodynamic dose calculation based on online dosimetry of photosensitizer in tissue before treatment. Methods and Materials: Photosensitizer verteporfin was quantified via multiple fluorescence microprobe measurements immediately before treatment. To compensate individual PDT treatments, photodynamic doses were calculated on an individual animal basis, by matching the light delivered to provide an equal photosensitizer dose multiplied by light dose. This was completed for the lower quartile, median, and upper quartile of the photosensitizer distribution. PDT-induced tumor responses were evaluated by the tumor regrowth assay. Results: Verteporfin uptake varied considerably among tumors and within a tumor. The coefficient of variation in the surviving fraction was found significantly decreased in groups compensated to the lower quartile (CL-PDT), the median (CM-PDT), and the upper quartile (CU-PDT) of photosensitizer distribution. The CL-PDT group was significantly less effective compared with NC-PDT (Noncompensated PDT), CM-PDT, and CU-PDT treatments. No significant difference in effectiveness was observed between NC-PDT, CM-PDT, and CU-PDT treatment groups. Conclusions: This research suggests that accurate quantification of tissue photosensitizer levels and subsequent adjustment of light dose will allow for reduced subject variation and improved treatment consistency.     

Phase 2 study of intraperitoneal topotecan as consolidation chemotherapy in ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Intravenous topotecan is approved for the treatment of ovarian cancer (OC). In intraperitoneal (i.p.) topotecan studies, 20 mg/m(2) dosing was tolerable. This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of i.p. topotecan as consolidation chemotherapy in patients with OC or primary peritoneal cancers (PPCs). METHODS: Patients with stage III/IV ovarian or PPC in clinical complete response after surgical cytoreduction and intravenous carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy who had benign findings or minimal persistent disease (< or = 1 cm diameter) at second-look surgery were eligible. Intraperitoneal topotecan 20 mg/m(2) was infused once every 21 days for 4 to 6 cycles. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled (18 [90%] patients had OC). Sixteen patients received 4 cycles, 3 patients received 6 cycles, and 1 patient withdrew after 1 cycle. The mean delivered dose was 18 mg/m(2). Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia and thrombocytopenia (45% for both). Grade 1/2 abdominal distension and nausea were reported in 60% and 40% of patients, respectively. Median PFS was 24 months from second-look surgery (95% confidence intervals [CI]: +/-10 months). Sixteen patients were alive and median OS was not reached at the time of data analysis. OS estimated at either 30 months from second-look surgery, or 3 years from initial diagnosis, was 84% (95% CI, 68%-100%). CONCLUSIONS: Consolidation i.p. topotecan is a feasible option for women withadvanced ovarian and primary peritoneal cancers. Further investigation of i.p. topotecan is warranted in this patient population.     

Ｐｈｏｔｏｆｒｉｎ光动力治疗舌癌的临床观察

目的　观察Ｐｈｏｔｏｆｒｉｎ光动力治疗舌癌的临床疗效和安全性。方法　２００３年７月至２００９年８月收治舌癌患者１４例,Ⅰ ～Ⅱ期４例,Ⅲ ～Ⅳ期１０例,所有舌癌患者均放弃或拒绝手术和放射治疗,并经病理确诊为高分化鳞癌。按２ｍｇ／ｋｇ静脉滴注光敏剂Ｐｈｏｔｏｆｒｉｎ,４８ｈ后经内镜导入光导纤维予波长６３０ｎｍ激光照射,照射方式分两种,即表面照射和组织间照射,治疗２４ｈ后清除坏死组织,并对深部肿瘤进行重复照射,治疗后１、３和６个月随访观察患者病灶的局部反应,并随访１４例患者的生存情况。结果　治疗后２４ｈ,病灶局部明显变暗、发紫,肿瘤组织坏死。舌癌患者光动力治疗总有效率为８５.７％,完全缓解率为２８.６％。获ＣＲ４例中Ⅰ期２例,Ⅱ、Ⅲ期各１例。１４例患者中位生存期为１３.５个月。结论　光动力治疗舌癌总有效率高,且耐受性好,早期舌癌患者可以保留语言功能并达到临床根治的目的,晚期患者可以明显改善生活质量,是一种较好的姑息治疗手段。     

Phase II study of gefitinib in patients with relapsed or persistent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma and evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and immunohistochemical expression: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial assessed the activity and tolerability of a daily oral dose of 500 mg gefitinib (ZD1839, Iressa) in patients with recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma, and explored the clinical value of determining the status of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Primary measure of efficacy was progression-free survival at 6 months. Mutations in exons 18 to 21 of EGFR and/or immunohistochemical expression of EGFR were evaluated in tumor specimens from patients enrolled in this trial as well as from patients not treated with gefitinib. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of 30 (90%) patients were eligible and evaluable for analysis of gefitinib efficacy and toxicity. Of these, four survived progression-free >6 months with one objective response (4%). The most commonly observed grade 3 toxicities were dermatologic (15%, 4 of 27) and diarrhea (30%, 8 of 27). Specimens from 26 of 26 or 25 of 26 patients were evaluable for immunohistochemical or mutation analysis, respectively. The response rate for patients with EGFR-positive tumors was 9% (1 of 11). EGFR expression was associated with longer progression-free survival (P = 0.008) and possibly longer survival (P = 0.082). The patient with the only objective response had a mutation in the catalytic domain of the tumor's EGFR (P = 0.04). Among 32 invasive tumors from patients not treated with gefitinib, one exhibited a catalytic domain mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Gefitinib was well tolerated but had minimal activity in unscreened patients with recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma. Prescreening patients for activating mutations in EGFR may improve response rate to gefitinib. This report is the first to document activating mutations in catalytic domain of EGFR in 3.5% (2 of 57) of ovarian cancers.     

胃镜下光动力疗法治疗上消化道肿瘤(14例)疗效分析

目的 评价胃镜下光动力疗法治疗卜消化道恶性肿瘤的适应证、疗效和安全性.方法 上消化道肿瘤患者14例.其中胃癌7例,食管癌7例,静脉注射光敏剂photosan(2mg/kg) 48小时后、血啉甲醚(5mg/kg) 24小时后应用氦氖激光经胃镜对病灶部位进行照射,治疗1月后复查胃镜观察病灶变化.结果 14例患者的显效率为7...     

三维适形放疗联合GP方案化疗治疗局部晚期胰腺癌的临床观察

目的 分析三维适形放疗(3-DCRT)联合GP方案化疗治疗局部晚期胰腺癌的临床疗效.方法 40例局部晚期胰腺癌随机分为2组,治疗组22例给予3-DCRT联合GP方案化疗,对照组18例仅给予3-DCRT,治疗结束后评价临床疗效和毒副反应.结果 治疗组和对照组中位生存期分别为15个月和7个月,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).治疗组6个月和12个月生存率分别为86.4％、68.2％,高于对照组的50.0％、33.3％,差异有统计学意义(P均＜0.05).主要毒副反应为胃肠道反应和骨髓抑制,但均较轻.结论 3-DCRT联合GP方案化疗治疗局部晚期胰腺癌安全有效.     

Phase II trial of irinotecan in patients with metastatic epithelial ovarian cancer or peritoneal cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan in patients with metastatic platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory epithelial ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with measurable disease were enrolled in our study at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Twenty-five of these patients were treated with irinotecan at a dose of 300 mg/m2 intravenously for 90 minutes every 3 weeks; the remaining six patients were treated with 250 mg/m2 because their age was greater than 65 years. Median age was 57 years (range, 38 to 74 years). The majority (84%) had a Zubrod performance status of 0. All patients were evaluated for irinotecan toxicity, and 29 (94%) were evaluable for response. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 17.2%. One patient (3%) had a complete response, four (14%) had partial responses, 14 (48%) had stable disease, and 10 had (35%) disease progression. Median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (range, 1.1 to 16 months), median duration of response was 1.4 months (range, 0.7 to 10.1 months); median survival from primary diagnosis was 24.3 months (range, 6.5 to 85.7 months); and median survival from initiation of irinotecan was 10.1 months (range, 2.3 to 34 months). Major toxicities included fatigue (16 patients), neutropenia (11 patients), diarrhea (nine patients), nausea (10 patients), and anorexia (seven patients). Eleven patients required dose reductions because of these toxicities. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Irinotecan has moderate efficacy and substantial toxicity in patients with metastatic platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer.