The current situation and subjects of the intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal dissemination in gastric cancer

Many different chemotherapeutic modalities have been done for patients with peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer. However, no regimen of chemotherapy has become the treatment of choice for the control of peritoneal dissemination. It is thought that intraperitoneal chemotherapy is effective to contact lesions directly and reduce its side effects. So, many kinds of anticancer agents, including cisplatin, via intraperitoneal administration have been tried for peritoneal dissemination therapy. However, they were not so effective. Recently, intraperitoneal taxane administration has proven very effective for the treatment and local control of severe peritoneal dissemination in gastric cancer. The response rate, including disappearance of as cites, was higher than that of MTX/5-FU systemic chemotherapy. There is no evidence that intraperitoneal taxane is significantly more effective than systemic chemotherapy in gastric cancer. But we considered that intraperitoneal taxane was promising for peritoneal dissemination therapy and organized the Society for the Study of Peritoneal Dissemination in Gastric Cancer. To determine the safety profile and activity of docetaxel via intraperitoneal administration combined with S-1 for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination, a multi-centric phase I/II study is being carried out now. A phase III study should be conducted in future for further understanding and cooperation in a smoothly undertaken investigation.     

Efficacy of continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion for the prophylaxis and treatment of peritoneal metastasis of advanced gastric cancer: evaluation by multivariate regression analysis.

Thirty-two patients with advanced gastric cancer underwent continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion (CHPP) combined with surgery: to prevent peritoneal recurrence in 15 patients without peritoneal metastasis (prophylactic CHPP) and to treat 17 patients with peritoneal metastases (therapeutic CHPP). The postoperative outcome was compared with that of control patients treated with surgery alone. Peritoneal recurrence was less frequent (26%) and the 5-year survival rate was significantly higher (39%) in the patients with prophylactic CHPP than in 40 control patients (42 and 17%, respectively). The patients with therapeutic CHPP showed significantly better median survival than did 20 control patients (11 vs. 6 months). Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that CHPP was an independent prognostic factor in the prophylactic study (hazard ratio = 0.3965), and that the independent prognostic factor in the therapeutic study was not CHPP but complete resection of the peritoneal metastasis. Thus, CHPP has no marked benefit for established peritoneal metastasis. CHPP for the prevention of peritoneal recurrence may have a beneficial effect on long-term survival, but a prospective randomized trial is needed to clarify its prognostic value.     

Treatment of gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis by continuous hyperthermic peritoneal infusion with mitomycin C and cisplatin

Following the resection of its primary lesion, continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion (CHPP) with anticancer drug (mitomycin C, cisplatin) containing warmed physiological saline was performed on gastric cancer having peritoneal dissemination, and the effect of CHPP was examined by second look operation (SLO). The subjects were 41 cases of gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination but without hepatic metastasis, which we have experienced in the past 7 years. The prognosis of these CHPP-treated cases was such that 50% survival period, 3 year survival rate and 5 year survival rate were 398 days, 28.5 and 12%, respectively. Comparison of the effects of CHPP by SLO revealed remarkable diminution of the peritoneal dissemination in 7 (44%) of 16 cases and disappearance of the ascites with a single course of CHPP in 7 of ascitic cases. Long-term survival (greater than 3 years) was noted in 4 of the CHPP-treated cases. Side effects were renal insufficiency, leukopenia and small intestinal perforation in 2(5), 2(5) and 1 cases (2%), respectively. The above results suggested the effectiveness of CHPP for the treatment of gastric cancer having peritoneal dissemination.     

Subtotal peritonectomy with chemohyperthermic peritoneal perfusion for peritonitis carcinomatosa in gastrointestinal cancer

Treatment for peritonitis carcinomatosa in gastrointestinal cancer remains to be established though it is one of the commonest causes of cancer death. Subtotal peritonectomy (SP) with chemohyperthermic peritoneal perfusion (CHPP) was developed for the new therapeutic strategy for peritoneal dissemination in gastrointestinal cancer in our department. SP includes resection of stomach, colon, small bowel, spleen, gall bladder, and parietal peritoneum. CHPP was carried out by heated saline containing 25 mg/l cisplatin, 10 mg/l mitomycin C, and 20 mg/l etoposide. Intraperitoneal temperature was maintained at 42 degrees C for 60 min. Fifteen gastric cancer and three colon cancer patients with severe peritoneal dissemination underwent these procedures. The averages of operating time, intraoperative bleeding volume, and total perioperative transfused blood volume were 9 h, 4400 ml, and 5600 ml, respectively. The patients estimated as complete resection and residual disease by histopathological study numbered 11 and 7. There was no treatment-related deaths though bleeding occurred in 5 patients; perforation in 2 patients; and abscesses in 2 patients. The 1-year survival rate (1ysr) and the 2-year survival rate (2-ysr) of all the patients were 57% and 21%, respectively. The 1-ysr and the 2-ysr of the patients who underwent complete resection were 67% and 40% significantly greater than the 43% and 0% of the patients who had residual tumors (p=0.02). The combination therapy of SP and CHPP is feasible in spite of its morbidity and has great possibilities in complete resection of peritoneal dissemination and prolongation of patient's survival.     

Effectiveness of intraperitoneal chemotherapy using new-aged drugs for the peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer

We evaluated the effectiveness of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer. A total of 104 patients with primary gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination were enrolled in this study. In 72 of the 104 patients with gastrectomy performed, 5 patients underwent CDDP-ip (50-100 mg/100-200 ml), 16 patients underwent CHPP (CDDP 300 mg, MMC 30 mg, ETP 150 mg/8 l/42-43 degrees C/60 min), and 17 patients underwent CMV-ip (CDDP 150 mg, MMC 20 mg, ETP 100 mg/1 l/60 min). The prognosis of patients who underwent CMV-ip was significantly better than those who received other therapies. In 26 patients with severe peritoneal dissemination who were treated with TS-1 (60 mg/m2) and taxane-ip (docetaxel 40-60 mg/body or paclitaxel 120-180 mg/body), 9 of 18 responders performed complete cytoreduction. The median survival time (MST) in these 9 patients was 944 days and a 2-year survival rate was 63%. A multimodal therapy consisting of systemic chemotherapy, intraperitoneal chemotherapy and complete cytoreductive surgery may provide good prognosis to the gastric cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination.     

Effectiveness of continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion for the peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer

We investigated the effectiveness of continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion (CHPP) for the peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer. A total 124 patients with advanced gastric cancer were enrolled in this study. Prophylactic CHPP (P-CHPP) was performed in 45 patients who had macroscopic serosal invasion without peritoneal dissemination, and 79 patients without CHPP were a control group. Therapeutic CHPP (T-CHPP) was performed in 21 patients with peritoneal dissemination, and 52 patients without CHPP were a control group. There was no significant difference in 5 year survival between patients treated and not treated with P-CHPP. Univariate analysis showed that location of tumor, tumor diameter, and lymph node metastasis influenced prognosis, but there was no prognostic factor in the Cox proportional regression hazard model. There was no significant difference in 5-year survival between patients treated and not treated with T-CHPP. Univariate analysis showed that degree of peritoneal dissemination and adjuvant chemotherapy influenced prognosis, and the Cox proportional regression hazard model showed that the macroscopic types and degree of peritoneal dissemination affected prognosis. In the patients with CHPP, the incidences of respiratory failure and renal failure were each statistically greater than in the patients undergoing CHPP.     

Continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion with cisplatin and mitomycin C for peritoneal dissemination in gastric cancer

Thirty-four patients with advanced gastric cancers had received continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion (CHPP) for prevention or treatment of peritoneal dissemination (PD). These patients received intra-abdominal perfusion 30-40 minutes by about 10-liter saline heated to 50-52 degrees C dissolving 200-300 mg cisplatin (CDDP) and 20-30 mg mitomycin C (MMC). The perfusate was infused in the peritoneal cavity through the peritoneal cavity expander (PCE Nihon Kayaku Co. Ltd.) newly developed for sufficient irrigation in our clinic. Eleven patients with macroscopic serosal invasion without PD (P0) or with mild PD (P1) underwent prophylactic CHPP for prevention of peritoneal recurrence. (Pn means degree of PD according to The General Rules for the Gastric Cancer Study.) Twenty-three patients with moderate PD (P2) or severe PD (P3) underwent therapeutic CHPP. The prognosis of patients having undergone prophylactic or therapeutic CHPP (CHPP (+) group) was compared with those not having done CHPP (CHPP (-) group) in the historical control study. In the prophylactic study two-year-survival rates of CHPP (+) group was 90% significantly higher than 63% in CHPP (-) group. There was no significant difference between two-year-survival rates of CHPP (+) (11%) and CHPP (-) (0%) in the therapeutic CHPP. But ascites was observed to disappear in five of twelve (41.7%). Surprisingly second look operation disclosed macroscopic and microscopic disappearance of PD in three of nine (33.3%). The side-effects in those patients had consisted of leakage, bone marrow suppression, perforation of small bowel and so on. But there was no mortality after introduction of PCE. About laboratory data, rises in WBC, BUN, creatinine and LDH and drops in total lymphocytes counts and platelets were all normalized within four weeks. The maximal concentrations of total and free, which emerged at five minutes after CHPP, were 2.19 and 1.29 micrograms/ml. These results suggested that CHPP with CDDP and MMC was well tolerated and effective for prevention of peritoneal recurrence and treatment of peritoneal dissemination in the gastric cancer.     

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal disease: experience from Singapore and Japan

Among advanced gastric cancer cases, peritoneal dissemination is a life-threatening mode of metastasis, and any strategy to control peritoneal metastasis will significantly improve treatment outcomes. Since intraperitoneal administration of anticancer drugs can induce an extremely high concentration of drugs in the peritoneal cavity, intraperitoneal chemotherapy would appear to be a reasonable and promising strategy to control the peritoneal dissemination. However, it has been reported in the past that intraperitoneal administration of mitomycin C or cisplatin resulted in no significant clinical effects against peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer. In contrast, intraperitoneal paclitaxel is expected to remain inside the peritoneal cavity due to its large molecular weight and fat solubility, leading to a high concentration of the drug in the peritoneal cavity. In fact, promising results in several phase II clinical trials using intraperitoneal paclitaxel have been reported, including a median survival time of 16.2–24.6 months and a 1-year overall survival rate of 69–78 %. Thereafter, a phase III randomized control study (PHOENIX-GC trial) with intraperitoneal paclitaxel plus systemic S-1 and intravenous paclitaxel in comparison to systemic S-1 plus cisplatin was conducted in Japan. Moreover, a phase II clinical trial of combination chemotherapy of intraperitoneal paclitaxel with systemic capecitabine plus oxaliplatin is currently ongoing in Singapore. In this review, based on clinical experience from Singapore and Japan, the clinical significance of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal disease is discussed.     

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal disease: experience from Singapore and Japan

Among advanced gastric cancer cases, peritoneal dissemination is a life-threatening mode of metastasis, and any strategy to control peritoneal metastasis will significantly improve treatment outcomes. Since intraperitoneal administration of anticancer drugs can induce an extremely high concentration of drugs in the peritoneal cavity, intraperitoneal chemotherapy would appear to be a reasonable and promising strategy to control the peritoneal dissemination. However, it has been reported in the past that intraperitoneal administration of mitomycin C or cisplatin resulted in no significant clinical effects against peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer. In contrast, intraperitoneal paclitaxel is expected to remain inside the peritoneal cavity due to its large molecular weight and fat solubility, leading to a high concentration of the drug in the peritoneal cavity. In fact, promising results in several phase II clinical trials using intraperitoneal paclitaxel have been reported, including a median survival time of 16.2–24.6 months and a 1-year overall survival rate of 69–78 %. Thereafter, a phase III randomized control study (PHOENIX-GC trial) with intraperitoneal paclitaxel plus systemic S-1 and intravenous paclitaxel in comparison to systemic S-1 plus cisplatin was conducted in Japan. Moreover, a phase II clinical trial of combination chemotherapy of intraperitoneal paclitaxel with systemic capecitabine plus oxaliplatin is currently ongoing in Singapore. In this review, based on clinical experience from Singapore and Japan, the clinical significance of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal disease is discussed.

     

Safety of intraperitoneal chemotherapy with paclitaxel in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination

We evaluated the safety of paclitaxel (TXL) via intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration in 6 patients with peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer. Four patients were treated with TXL via i.p. administration at a dosage of 80-90 mg/m2 every 1 to 2 weeks. Grade 4 leukopenia was observed in 1 patient, accompanied with massive ascites. Two other patients, who also had malignant peritoneal effusion, were treated with TXL via i.p. administration at a dosage of 60 mg/m2 every 1 to 2 weeks. All toxicities were mild in those two patients. TXL via i.p. administration at a dosage of less than 90 mg/m2 has never been reported to cause a grade 4 leukopenia. These results suggest that a phase I/II study of TXL via i.p. administration should be tried in gastric cancer patients with malignant peritoneal effusion.     

A pharmacological review on intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal malignancy

Perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy in combination with cytoreductive surgery has been shown to be of benefit for treating selected patients with peritoneal surface malignancy. It has become a new standard of care in the management of diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma and peritoneal dissemination of appendiceal malignancy. Numerous recent publications on carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer and gastric cancer identify groups of patients that would benefit from this local-regional approach for prevention and treatment of carcinomatosis. This review focuses on pharmacological information regarding intraperitoneal chemotherapeutic agents commonly used in gastrointestinal oncology.     

Multidisciplinary therapy for peritoneal dissemination using peritonectomy

An aggressive approach to peritoneal dissemination involves peritonectomy procedures combined with preoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy, intraoperative chemo-hyperthermia, and postoperative systemic chemotherapy. We have been performing multimodal therapy consisting of peritonectomy plus perioperative chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with peritoneal dissemination. Fifty-seven patients with established peritoneal dissemination from gastric cancer (n = 32), colon cancer (n = 17), ovarian cancer (n = 7), and mesothelioma (n = 1) have been treated with peritonectomy and intraoperative chemo-hyperthermia. Five-year survival rates of patients with gastric and colon cancer were 18% and 38%, respectively. Among various clinical factors, complete tumor resection was the most significant prognostic factor, and the prognosis of patients who underwent complete cytoreduction was significantly better than those who received incomplete cytoreduction. A multimodal therapy consisting of perioperative chemotherapy and peritonectomy with complete cytoreduction may be the most powerful method to treat patients with established peritoneal dissemination.     

MUC2 protein expression status is useful in assessing the effects of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal dissemination of colon cancer

We conducted a molecular biological investigation to determine the outcomes of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) treatment, and whether it is effective in all cases for patients with peritoneal dissemination of colon cancer. In the HIPEC group, the 3-year survival rate was 39.2%, whereas in the non-HIPEC group the 3-year survival rate was 15.6%. MUC2 expression was investigated in the HIPEC group, in patients positive for MUC2 expression, and the 3-year survival rate was 0.0%, while in patients negative for MUC2 expression, the 3-year survival rate was 61.1%. In addition, as a result of introducing MUC2-siRNA into a colon cancer cell line with high expression of the MUC2 gene, the cell death rate from heat and anticancer agents increased 40% in comparison with colon cancer cells in which scrambled siRNA had not been introduced. HIPEC therapy is thought to be effective in prolonging survival in patients with peritoneal dissemination of colon cancer, and MUC2 expression is thought to be useful as an indicator to assess its effectiveness in colon cancer cells.     

Recent advances in the treatment of peritoneal dissemination of gastrointestinal cancers by nucleoside antimetabolites

Peritoneal dissemination is the most common cause of metastasis from malignancies in the abdominal cavity. There are no standard treatments for peritoneal dissemination and the results are poor. The reasons for this are as follows: (1) no effective chemotherapeutic agents have been identified or developed; (2) surgical cytoreduction has little effect on survival improvement; and (3) the molecular mechanisms of peritoneal dissemination have not been clarified and no therapy against the target molecules has been developed. However, studies on the molecular mechanisms of peritoneal dissemination have elucidated some of the target molecules and the development of new multimodal therapies has also improved survival. Early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy, hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy and neoadjuvant intraperitoneal-systemic chemotherapy have been newly developed, and a novel surgical therapy named peritonectomy has been proposed to perform complete cytoreduction of peritoneal dissemination. At present, these approaches appear to be effective therapeutic modalities for peritoneal dissemination. However, TS-1 and capecitabine have shown worthwhile results in recent clinical trials for patients with advanced gastric cancer. We recently found that newly developed antitumor cytosine nucleoside analogs show a survival advantage in peritoneal dissemination models using human cancer cells. These non-fluoropyrimidine nucleosides may potentially help to improve the poor prognosis observed in patients with advanced cancers involving peritoneal dissemination.     

Treatment of VX2 carcinoma implanted in the liver with arterial and intraperitoneal administration of oily anticancer agents

PURPOSE: Long-term survival and cure cannot be achieved in patients with unresectable, advanced abdominal cancer, because no chemotherapeutic treatment has definite antitumor activity for malignant solid tumor and its dissemination. In this study, arterial and intraperitoneal administration of oily anticancer agents, which have properties that permit targeted chemotherapy for VX2 carcinoma implanted in the liver, was attempted to achieve long-term survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rabbits bearing VX2 tumors in the liver measuring 1-2 cm in diameter received an arterial injection of 0.2 ml of nitrogen mustard N-Oxide (HN2-O) dissolved in Lipiodol (7.5 mg/ml), a newly developed oily anticancer agent, for the tumor and an intraperitoneal injection of a cocktail of oily anticancer agents for the prevention of intraperitoneal dissemination. RESULTS: Twelve out of thirteen rabbits survived and VX2 cancer was not observed in these 12 rabbits. The controls received a sham operation, an intraperitoneal injection of the cocktail of oily anticancer agents alone, or an arterial injection of HN2-O/Lipiodol alone. In these control groups, 27 out of 29 rabbits died of cancer. To examine the dose form for arterial injection, 14 rabbits received an arterial injection of the simple mixture of HN2-O dissolved in physiological saline and Lipiodol, with an additional intraperitoneal injection of the cocktail. Eight of these 14 rabbits died of enlargement of the hepatic tumor and peritoneal dissemination. CONCLUSION: Long-term survival and cure was achieved in almost all rabbits bearing VX2 tumor in the liver by simultaneous arterial and intraperitoneal injection of oily anticancer agents.     

Effect of intraperitoneal chemotherapy on experimental peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer

In vitro chemosensitivity test using a collagen-gel method was done on 165 primary gastric cancers. All of 5-FU, CBDCA, CDDP and docetaxel showed a high sensitivity. The effects of per oral (po) administration of TS-1, a combination of po TS-1 and intraperitoneal (ip) administration of CDDP, ip 5-FU and ip docetaxel, were evaluated in athymic mice bearing peritoneal dissemination of a gastric cancer cell line (MKN-45-P that shows a high rate of metastasis to the peritoneal cavity of nude mice). Nude mice were inoculated by ip with 10(7) MKN-45-P cells. No survival benefit was obtained after po administration of TS-1 (12 mg/kg) alone or ip CDDP alone. However, a combination of po TS-1 (8 mg/kg x 10 days, from day 3) and ip CDDP (3.5 mg/kg, day 6 and 13) showed a significant survival improvement than that of po TS-1 or ip CDDP treatment alone. ip administration of 30 mg/kg (3 times/week x 3 weeks) or 15 mg/kg (6 times/week x 3 weeks) of 5-FU significantly improved the survival of mice bearing MKN-45-P. 5-FU concentration of ascites after ip administration of 30 mg/kg of 5-FU was 600-fold higher than po administration of 12 mg/kg of TS-1 at peak level. ip injections of docetaxel of 8 mg/kg, and 2 mg/kg improved the survival of 4 and 1 mice, respectively, and they were tumor-free on day 90. Survival of mice treated with ip injection of CBDCA (100 mg/kg, on day 3, or 50 mg/ kg on day 3 and 10) was significantly better than the control group. These results suggest the potential of po TS-1 + ip CDDP, ip 5-FU, ip docetaxel and ip CBDCA administration for the treatment of peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer.     

Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, marimastat, decreases peritoneal spread of gastric carcinoma in nude mice.

Marimastat, a matrix metalloproteinese inhibitor, was examined for the ability to prevent peritoneal dissemination of a human gastric cancer xenograft, TMK-1. Even with novel approaches such as molecular targeting of cancer chemotherapy, peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer has little sensitivity to anticancer drugs, and it is impossible to inhibit its growth completely. Intraperitoneal injection of TMK-1 into nude mice at 5 x 10( 5) cells / body resulted in carcinomatous peritonitis that mimicked clinical cases. Continuous administration of marimastat (18 mg / kg / day) from 24 h after the tumor inoculation successfully inhibited the growth of peritoneal dissemination nodules. Combined administration of marimastat (18 mg / kg / day) and mitomycin C (MMC, 2 mg / kg) showed synergistic inhibition of growth of peritoneal dissemination, being superior to MMC alone (2 mg / kg). Although marimastat alone could not increase survival time with statistical significance, combined administration of marimastat and MMC had a survival benefit with statistical significance. The combination of marimastat and MMC increased the preventive effect on peritoneal dissemination. Marimastat seems to be a candidate for the prevention of peritoneal spread of gastric carcinoma.     

Effective therapy for peritoneal dissemination in gastric cancer

Peritoneal dissemination is the most frequent cause of death from gastric cancer, accounting for death in 20% to 40% of patients. Preoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy, peritonectomy, intraoperative chemohyperthermic perfusion, and early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy are treatment modalities specifically designed to eliminate peritoneal dissemination and progression. Preoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy is for containment of peritoneal free cancer cells, and also may facilitate complete eradication of visible peritoneal dissemination by peritonectomy. Further, complete cytoreduction can be achieved more often when peritonectomy is included in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination. Phase III data shows prolonged survival attributed to complete cytoreduction. Aggressive cytoreduction of peritoneal dissemination by peritonectomy can reduce residual tumor burden to micrometastases on the peritoneal surface that can be treated by intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy and early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Among all these modalities, surgical cytoreduction is probably the most important for survival benefit. If the surgical cytoreduction is visibly incomplete, prolonged survival cannot be expected, despite subsequent treatment. The surgeon's goal is to reduce the cancer cell burden to a microscopic level. Continued refinement of phase II studies is needed for maximal benefit and to standardize the technical and chemotherapeutic options of each modality.     

The use of bevacizumab in refractory peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer with malignant ascites-two case reports

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays an important role in proliferation of cancer cells, angiogenesis and vascular permeability in peritoneal dissemination. In addition, the release of VEGF by tumor cells has been identified as a main factor promoting the intraperitoneal secretion of fluid. Accordingly, recent evidence suggests that targeting VEGF may have the potential to suspend the ascites production resulting from peritoneal metastasis. We previously reported the effects of bevacizumab (BEV) on the growth inhabitation of peritoneal nodules and the reduction of ascites in peritoneal metastatic models. Here we present two cases of women (62 and 42 years old) with refractory peritoneal dissemination of scirrhous gastric cancer and server symptomatic ascites. They required frequent paracenteses for ascites which was resistant to systemic and intraperitoneal chemotherapy of S-1 and taxane. We treated them with intravenous BEV (5-10 mg/kg) with dramatic improvement in their ascites. BEV may have a role in the management of malignant ascites in the patient with refractory gastric cancer which should be confirmed in a larger series of well selected patients.     

Treatment results of peritoneal dissemination from gastric cancer by neoadjuvant intraperitoneal-systemic chemotherapy

No standard treatment exists for peritoneal dissemination from gastric cancer. We reviewed our experience using a novel treatment consisting of peritonectomy and intraoperative chemo-hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion (CHPP). Records of all patients who underwent CHPP and cytoreductive surgery from 1992 to 2001 were reviewed. RESULTS: Data from 107 patients (average age, 52 years) were available. P3 dissemination was found in 72 patients, and 8 and 27 patients showed P1 or P2 dissemination, respectively. Peritoneal metastasis was synchronous in 75 and metachronous in 32 patients. All patients received CHPP after cytoreductive surgery. Peritonectomy was performed in 42 patients. Complete cytoreduction (CC-0) was achieved in 47 patients (44%). Peritonectomy, resulted in CC-0 in 69% (29/42), but CC-0 was achieved in 18 of 65 (28%) patients by ordinary surgical techniques. There were 23 postoperative complications (21%) after operation. The overall operative mortality was 2.8% (3/107). Median follow-up for the entire study group was 46 months. Seventeen patients (15%) were disease-free, and 90 patients were dead at the time of analysis. Eighty-seven deaths were related to progression of disease. The median survival of all patients was 16.2 months, with an actual 5-year survival of 6%. Median survival of CHPP plus ordinary cyoreduction was 12.0 months and that after CHPP and peritonectomy was 22.8 months. Completeness of cytoreduction and peritonectomy were significant prognostic factors on univariate analysis and 5-year survival rate was 27%. Lymph node status, grade of peritoneal dissemination (P1-2 vs P3), age (>60 years vs <60 years), tumor volume of dissemination (>2.5 cm vs <2.5 cm in diameter), and histologic type (differentiated vs. poorly differentiated type) did not affect survival. The cox proportional model demonstrated that completeness of cytoreduction was the strongest prognostic factor. Patients who had an incomplete resection had 2.8-fold higher risk of dying from disease than patients who underwent complete cytoreduction. The 5-year survival after complete cytoreduction was 12%, compared with 2% for incomplete resection. Four patients lived more than 5 years. Cytoreduction was incomplete in one 5-year survivor who showed complete response to CHPP. CONCLUSION: Complete cytoreduction using peritonectomy and CHPP may improve survival of patients with peritoneal dissemination from gastric cancer. This procedure is most appropriate for highly motivated patients who are committed to survive as long as possible.