Comparison of intravenous amrinone and dobutamine in congestive heart failure due to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

A prospective randomized study was performed in 46 consecutive patients with refractory congestive heart failure (CHF) due to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy to compare the hemodynamic responses to 48-hour infusions of amrinone and dobutamine. Both drugs substantially reduced pulmonary arterial wedge pressure, right atrial pressure and systemic vascular resistance and increased cardiac index. Amrinone caused a greater decrease in right atrial pressure than dobutamine (p less than 0.02) and had a positive chronotropic effect not observed with dobutamine (p less than 0.01). The increase in heart rate produced by amrinone correlated inversely with the changes in right atrial and pulmonary arterial wedge pressures, suggesting a baroreceptor response to reduced preload. Dobutamine produced a larger increase in stroke volume index than amrinone (p less than 0.01). Ninety-one percent of patients receiving amrinone and only 65% receiving dobutamine had reduction of greater than or equal to 30% in pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (p less than 0.05). Cardiac index increased greater than or equal to 30% in similar numbers of patients given amrinone (74%) and dobutamine (65%). Negative fluid balance was recorded in all patients receiving amrinone and in 78% of patients receiving dobutamine (p less than 0.05). Target hemodynamic criteria were achieved in 83% of patients receiving 10 micrograms/kg/min of amrinone. The effective maintenance dose of dobutamine was extremely variable. No clinically important adverse effects were observed with either drug regimen. Both amrinone and dobutamine are effective and safe agents for short-term parenteral therapy of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy in severe CHF that is unresponsive to oral medication.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Additive effects of dobutamine and amrinone on myocardial contractility and ventricular performance in patients with severe heart failure

The effects of amrinone, dobutamine, and a combination of the two drugs on peak positive left ventricular dP/dt and left ventricular performance were evaluated in 11 patients with chronic congestive heart failure. When administered alone, both dobutamine (10.9 micrograms/kg/min) and intravenous amrinone (1.9 mg/kg/min) significantly increased left ventricular dP/dt and performance. When compared with dobutamine alone, the addition of amrinone resulted in further increases in left ventricular dP/dt and cardiac index (to 1319 +/- 419 from 1202 +/- 376 mm Hg/sec, p less than .002, and to 3.56 +/- 0.78 from 3.04 +/- 0.67 liters/min/m2, p less than .01, respectively). The combination also induced a further reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (to 15.3 +/- 11.3 from 18.2 +/- 10.3 mm Hg, p less than .05) when compared with amrinone alone. The combination of dobutamine and amrinone increased heart rate slightly when compared with either drug alone, but did not further reduce systemic arterial pressure when compared with amrinone alone. The dose-response curve of left ventricular dP/dt and performance during titration of dobutamine with and without the addition of intravenous amrinone was evaluated in seven patients. The addition of amrinone to any dose of dobutamine produced higher cardiac index and lower systemic vascular resistance than dobutamine or amrinone alone. Thus, when compared with dobutamine alone in patients with chronic congestive heart failure, the addition of intravenous amrinone to dobutamine results in an additive improvement in left ventricular performance throughout the dose range.     

Comparative vasoactive therapy for heart failure

Dopamine and dobutamine increase myocardial contractility by beta-adrenergic stimulation. Both agents provide significant support for decompensating congestive heart failure (CHF) patients. At the same time, both agents can have significant adverse effects. In 1981, it was reported that amrinone, a bipyridine derivative, produced hemodynamic changes similar to those of dobutamine. To confirm these results, the hemodynamic and clinical effects of amrinone were compared with those of dopamine and dobutamine in 15 consecutive patients with CHF. Although each drug improved maximal cardiac index to a similar extent, dopamine did not decrease pulmonary artery wedge pressure and caused a greater increase in heart rate. Dobutamine and amrinone conferred similar hemodynamic benefits: cardiac index improved from 2.4 +/- 0.2 to 3.4 +/- 0.2 liters/min/m2 with dobutamine and from 2.1 +/- 0.2 to 3.2 +/- 0.2 liters/min/m2 with amrinone. Pulmonary artery wedge pressure decreased similarly: from 19 +/- 2 to 13 +/- 1 mm Hg with dobutamine and from 18 +/- 2 to 12 +/- 1 mm Hg with amrinone. Dobutamine and amrinone produced similar modest decreases in mean arterial pressure and increments in heart rate. Dopamine was poorly tolerated; 5 patients developed such severe adverse reactions that this drug was discontinued prematurely. Dobutamine and amrinone were much better tolerated. Although amrinone caused asymptomatic tachycardia (heart rate increase greater than 20% over baseline) in 4 patients, no patient developed an adverse reaction warranting its premature termination.     

Failure of low doses of amrinone to produce sustained hemodynamic improvement in patients with severe chronic congestive heart failure

Although amrinone produces acute hemodynamic improvement in patients with severe chronic congestive heart failure (CHF), it has not produced clinical benefits in long-term controlled trials. To determined if the administration of subtherapeutic doses of amrinone may account for its lack of efficacy in these studies, the dose requirements of the drug were investigated in 30 patients with severe CHF. Doses of 100 mg of oral amrinone produced moderate increases in cardiac index (0.35 liters/min/m2) and decreases in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (6.8 mm Hg) and systemic vascular resistance (16%) (all p less than 0.01); these effects, however, were short-lived (less than 2.5 hours). Doses of 200 mg of oral amrinone produced marked increases in cardiac index (0.56 liters/min/m2) and substantial decreases in left ventricular filling pressure (9.9 mm Hg) and systemic vascular resistance (30%) (all p less than 0.01), and these effects persisted for longer than 4 hours. Only 4 patients showed hemodynamic responses with 100 mg of the drug that were sufficiently marked and long-lasting to merit chronic therapy, whereas 28 patients had such a response with the 200-mg dose. When 200 mg of amrinone was administered orally every 8 hours, sustained hemodynamic benefits were seen for 48 hours. However, 16 of 22 patients who received 600 mg of the drug daily for more than 1 week had intolerable adverse reactions that required drug withdrawal. In conclusion, hemodynamically effective doses of amrinone (600 mg/day) cannot be tolerated for long periods by most patients with severe chronic CHF.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparison of intravenous milrinone and dobutamine for congestive heart failure secondary to either ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy

Milrinone and dobutamine are positive inotropic agents with beneficial hemodynamic effects in patients with congestive heart failure. This study was undertaken to compare the effects of intravenous milrinone and dobutamine in patients with stable New York Heart Association class III or IV congestive heart failure and to test the hypothesis that intravenous milrinone is at least as beneficial as dobutamine in this setting. Seventy-nine patients were randomized to either dobutamine therapy at incremental doses of 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5 and 15 micrograms/kg/min, or milrinone as a bolus of 50 or 75 micrograms/kg followed by an infusion of 0.5 to 1.0 micrograms/kg/min. Both agents significantly increased heart rate, cardiac index and stroke volume index and decreased pulmonary artery wedge pressure and systemic vascular resistance compared with baseline levels (p less than 0.01). During sustained infusion for 48 hours, no difference in hemodynamic effects was observed between the 2 drugs. Ventricular tachycardia occurred in 5 patients (3 taking milrinone, 2 taking dobutamine); 1 patient taking milrinone had ventricular fibrillation. Milrinone and dobutamine elicited similar beneficial hemodynamic results with relatively few adverse effects.     

Augmentation of cardiac function in end-stage heart failure by combined use of dobutamine and amrinone

A patient with end-stage congestive cardiomyopathy had progressive hemodynamic deterioration while awaiting orthotopic heart transplantation. Attempts to support cardiovascular function by high-dose dobutamine infusions were complicated by life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias. The addition of the noncatecholamine inotropic agent, amrinone, improved ventricular performance, enabling reduction of the dose of dobutamine and resolution of the cardiac arrhythmias. Beta receptor stimulation by dobutamine combined with phosphodiesterase inhibition by amrinone may additively or synergistically augment cardiac function despite severe congestive heart failure and also have an adrenergic "sparing effect."     

Hemodynamic effect of dobutamine in patients with severe heart failure

Dobutamine, a derivative of dopamine, was infused at a rate of 10 μg/kg per min in 15 patients with severe congestive heart failure. Cardiac output increased from an average of 3.1 to 5.6 liters/min (P < 0.001) with no change in mean arterial pressure (93.3 to 98.2 mm Hg) and only a slight increase in heart rate (98.5 to 105.2 beats/min) (P < 0.02). Pulmonary wedge pressure was decreased from an average of 27.4 to 21.1 mm Hg (P < 0.001). In seven patients a dose of 5 μg/kg per min also produced a significant increase in cardiac output but the effect was less than with the 10 μg/kg per min dose. No side effects were observed during the infusion. Dobutamine therefore is a potent inotropic drug with limited chronotropic and peripheral vascular effects and deserves therapeutic trial in the short-term management of low output heart failure.     

Comparative effects of dobutamine and amrinone on coronary blood flow in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

Although amrinone has favorable hemodynamic effects in patients with congestive heart failure, little is known about its effects on coronary blood flow (CBF). We compared the effects of intravenous low-dose dobutamine and amrinone on CBF in 10 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy using a Doppler guidewire. We infused dobutamine at a dose of 5 and 10 μg/kg/min for 5 min. After the end of each stage, coronary flow velocity (CFV) and coronary arterial diameter (CAD) in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery, and hemodynamic variables were obtained. After the CFV and hemodynamics returned to baseline, we infused 1 mg/kg of amrinone over 5 min, and obtained these variables at 5 and 10 min after the cessation of the infusion. CAD did not increase with dobutamine, but significantly increased after amrinone (% increase: 10 ± 7%; P < 0.001 vs. baseline). CFV progressively increased with dobutamine (5 μg/kg/min: 21 ± 26%; P < 0.05 vs. baseline; 10 μg/kg/min: 53 ± 42%; P < 0.005 vs. baseline and 5 μg/kg/min), but slightly decreased after amrinone (−4 ± 17%; P = not significant vs. baseline). CBF increased during dobutamine (5 μg/kg/min: 25 ± 29%; P < 0.05; 10 μg/kg/min: 66 ± 55%; P < 0.005) and after amrinone (19 ± 22%; P < 0.05) compared to that at baseline. Although there was a significant correlation between the percent increase in CFV and that in dP/dt during dobutamine infusion (r = 0.82, P < 0.001), this correlation was not observed after amrinone (r = 0.23). In conclusion, although both agents significantly increased CBF in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, they do so by different mechanisms. Amrinone mainly increases CBF by causing dilatation of epicardial coronary arteries. These results suggest that amrinone has beneficial effects on coronary flow dynamics in dilated cardiomyopathy. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn. 41:157–163, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Usefulness of dopexamine hydrochloride versus dobutamine in chronic congestive heart failure and effects on hemodynamics and urine output

The hemodynamic effects of dopexamine hydrochloride and dobutamine were compared during dose-response infusions of dopexamine (1.0 to 4.0 micrograms/kg/min) and dobutamine (2.5 to 10.0 micrograms/kg/min) and during 48-hr infusions at doses producing initial matched increases in cardiac output. Thirty-three patients with severe, stable, chronic congestive heart failure (CHF) (New York Heart Association class III to IV) participated. Both drugs produced an increase in cardiac index, brought about by increased stroke volume index and heart rate, and systemic vasodilatation. The relative contribution of these mechanisms differed, dopexamine proving the more potent vasodilator. The effects of dopexamine were maintained without variation during the 48-hr infusion, apart from a reduction in the increase in heart rate. The effects of dobutamine, while remaining above control at most time-points during the 48-hr infusion, attenuated toward control values. Dopexamine also appeared to promote increased urine output and creatinine clearance during the 48-hr infusion. Both drugs were well tolerated. Dopexamine elicited larger peak hemodynamic effects at dosages that had equivalent effects on cardiac output, and favorable renal responses, and demonstrated no long-term attenuation of effect.     

Cardiocirculatory effects of afterload reduction with oral trimazosin in severe chronic congestive heart failure.

Because improved long-term oral vasodilator therapy for chronic congestive heart failure is needed, the cardiocirculatory effects of the new antihypertensive quinazoline derivative, trimazosin, were evaluated with use of concomitant cardiac catheterization and forearm plethysmography in nine patients with severe chronic congestive heart failure due to coronary disease. After ingestion of 100 to 300 mg (average 172 mg) of trimazosin, the greatly elevated left ventricular filling pressure decreased from 30 to 23 mm Hg and the lowered cardiac index rose from 2.02 to 2.59 liters/min per m2. Considerable improvement in cardiac function occurred within 1 hour after ingestion of trimazosin; peak efficacy was achieved after 2 hours and persisted in the 3rd hour. Heart rate was unchanged and systemic blood pressure was mildly reduced. Because pump performance was enhanced while indexes of myocardial oxygen consumption declined, ventricular efficiency increased. Vascular relaxation was produced in both the systemic resistance and capacitance beds, with venodilation slightly more prominent. This clinical investigation of the acute hemodynamic effects of trimazosin objectively demonstrates that the drug provides considerable hemodynamic benefit in cardiac dysfunction and is therefore a potentially salutary agent for treatment of patients with chronic severe congestive heart failure.     

Combined therapy with dobutamine and amrinone in severe heart failure. Improved hemodynamics and increased activation of the renin-angiotensin system with combined intravenous therapy

The hemodynamic and hormonal responses to dobutamine alone and with the addition of amrinone were studied in ten patients with severe heart failure. Dobutamine significantly increased heart rate, cardiac index, and stroke volume index and significantly decreased mean right atrial and systemic arterial pressures and systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance. The addition of amrinone further decreased significantly mean right atrial, pulmonary arterial, and pulmonary arterial wedge pressures and systemic vascular resistance, while heart rate rose. The response of the cardiac index was variable, increasing in seven and decreasing in three patients. Plasma renin activity rose significantly with dobutamine and further increased with amrinone. We conclude that in most patients with severe heart failure, amrinone, when combined with dobutamine, improves hemodynamics. The further increase in heart rate, variable effects on the cardiac index, and marked activation of the renin-angiotensin system suggest caution and potential limitations in the use of this combination.     

Comparison of acute hemodynamic response to dobutamine and intravenous MDL 17,043 (enoximone) in severe congestive heart failure secondary to ischemic cardiomyopathy or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

The acute hemodynamic response to intravenous dobutamine administration was compared with intravenous MDL 17,043 administration in 8 patients with severe, chronic congestive heart failure. Simultaneous radionuclide angiography was performed with gated equilibrium blood pool imaging to derive left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction during serial hemodynamic measurements. Six patients had an optimal dobutamine dose of 10 micrograms/kg/min; 2 others were compared at a dose of 7.5 micrograms/kg/min; comparisons with MDL 17,043 were after a 1.5-mg/kg bolus dose in all 8 patients. Dobutamine and MDL 17,043 caused significant and similar increases in cardiac index and stroke volume index. Dobutamine significantly increased heart rate and MDL 17,043 did not. MDL 17,043 significantly decreased pulmonary artery wedge, mean pulmonary artery and right atrial pressures; dobutamine did not. Dobutamine increased end-diastolic volume in 4 patients, with little concomitant decrease in wedge pressure; MDL 17,043 caused no change or a decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic volume in 5 patients, but consistently decreased wedge pressure in all. Thus, the left ventricular pressure-volume curve was displaced downward to a more favorable position after MDL 17,043 but not after dobutamine. In patients with chronic congestive heart failure, acute myocardial performance was more optimally influenced by MDL 17,043 than dobutamine administration.     

Comparative effects on hemodynamics of enoximone (MDL 17,043), dobutamine and nitroprusside in severe congestive heart failure

To assess their comparative effects on hemodynamics, nitroprusside, dobutamine and enoximone were sequentially administered to 10 patients with severe congestive heart failure. Nitroprusside, dobutamine (at 10 micrograms/kg/min) and enoximone (at 2 mg/kg) increased stroke volume index to a similar extent (31%, 34% and 36%, respectively). Enoximone produced less tachycardia than dobutamine and, consequently, a smaller improvement in cardiac index. Mean arterial pressure was not altered by dobutamine but was reduced 9% by enoximone, 2 mg/kg. This finding accounts for the larger (although not significant) increase in left ventricular stroke work index observed with dobutamine compared with enoximone. Ventricular filling pressures and vascular resistances were significantly decreased by all 3 drugs (p = 0.001). All 3 drugs improved cardiac pump function when assessed by the increase in stroke index to a similar extent; however, enoximone (2 mg/kg) resulted in less hypotension than nitroprusside (mean arterial pressure -9% vs -22%, p = 0.0001) and in less tachycardia than dobutamine 10 micrograms/kg/min. Those differences in mode of action account for the variations observed in the heart rate-blood pressure product (dobutamine 10 micrograms/kg/min, +18%, enoximone 2 mg/kg, -5%, p = 0.003). Enoximone thus appears to be of great value in the management of severe congestive heart failure by its combination of vasodilatory and inotropic properties. Enoximone (2 mg/kg) provides a clinically significant increase in cardiac index, a clear reduction of ventricular filling pressures, a moderate reduction of mean arterial pressure and only minor changes of heart rate and of rate pressure product.     

Comparison of hemodynamic actions of pirbuterol and dobutamine on cardiac function in severe congestive heart failure

There is considerable interest in the development of beneficial oral inotropic agents for sustained ambulatory management of patients with severe chronic congestive heart failure. Therefore, the hemodynamic actions of the oral beta adrenergic receptor agonist pirbuterol and of intravenous dobutamine were compared in nine patients with severe heart failure. Both agents produced similar effects on ventricular pump function: The cardiac index was markedly increased from 1.8 to 2.6 liters/min per m² (p < 0.005) by dobutamine and from 1.8 to 2.9 liters/min per m² (p < 0.001) by pirbuterol; stroke index was increased from 24 to 32 ml/beat per m² (p < 0.02) by dobutamine and from 23 to 35 ml/beat per m² (p < 0.001) by pirbuterol; the stroke work index was increased from 19 to 27 g-m/m² (p < 0.005) by dobutamine and from 20 to 28 g-m/m² (p < 0.005) by pirbuterol. However, although dobutamine did not change mean blood pressure or left ventricular filling pressure (p < 0.05), pirbuterol modestly decreased mean blood pressure from 83 to 75 mm Hg (p < 0.02) and moderately decreased left ventricular filling pressure from 23 to 18 mm Hg (p < 0.005). Dobutamine reduced total systemic vascular resistance 22 percent from 2,049 to 1,582 dynes s cm^?5 (p < 0.001), whereas pirbuterol reduced this index 42 percent (p < 0.05 versus dobutamine) from 2,068 to 1,150 dynes s cm^?5. Neither agent altered heart rate or the heart rate-systolic blood pressure product (p < 0.05).Thus, oral pirbuterol has dobutamine-like beneficial hemodynamic effects on left ventricular pump function but causes a greater decrease in total systemic vascular resistance consistent with the combined inotropic and peripheral vasodilator actions of this oral beta adrenergic receptor agonist. These salutary hemodynamic responses suggest that oral pirbuterol may be useful for the prolonged treatment of severe chronic congestive heart failure.     

Amrinone and exercise performance in patients with chronic heart failure

Whether cardiotonic agents can improve the ability of patients with chronic heart failure to exercise remains unknown. Accordingly, the circulatory and respiratory response of 11 patients with severe heart failure refractory to digitalis, diuretic drugs and vasodilators was assessed during upright treadmill exercise before, within 24 hours and after 4 weeks of therapy with amrinone. The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of amrinone therapy to improve exercise hemodynamics, effort tolerance and aerobic capacity of these patients. Acute intravenous administration of amrinone (1.8 ± 0.1 mg/kg body weight) produced the following changes (mean values ± standard error of the mean) in hemodynamic variables during supine rest; increased cardiac index (from 2.04 ± 0.39 to 2.99 ± 0.38 liters/min per m²; p <0.01) and reduced pulmonary wedge pressure (from 24 ± 6 to 14 ± 6 mm Hg; p <0.01) without altering heart rate or mean arterial pressure. Within 24 hours after administration of amrinone, wedge pressure decreased at the onset of (from 25 ± 7 to 14 ± 7 mm Hg) and throughout exercise (p <0.01), whereas the exercise response of cardiac output, arteriovenous oxygen difference, heart rate, pulmonary and systemic vascular resistances, maximal oxygen uptake and the pattern of ventilation remained similar to control values. However, after 4 weeks of amrinone therapy, exercise and aerobic capacities were increased 44 and 48 percent (p <0.03), respectively, whereas the ventilatory response was unchanged. Thus, amrinone is a potent cardiotonic agent that acutely improves the function of the failing heart at rest and during exercise; the maximal aerobic capacity was increased after 4 weeks of therapy. Amrinone therefore appears to hold promise for the management of patients with chronic heart failure.     

Sustained beneficial effects of oral amrinone on cardiac and renal function in patients with severe congestive heart failure

Although effectiveness of oral amrinone has been demonstrated in animals, amrinone has been shown in human subjects to improve cardiac performance in the failing heart only after acute intravenous administration. Therefore, we studied the hemodynamic and renal effects of orally administered amrinone (50 to 300 mg) in 10 patients with advanced congestive heart failure. Cardiac index increased from 1.56 ± 0.41 (mean ± standard deviation) to 2.20 ± 0.43 liters/min per m² (p < 0.001); pulmonary wedge pressure decreased from 26.1 ± 5.7 to 17.0 ± 5.7 mm Hg (p < 0.001). Mean arterial pressure decreased from 86.0 ± 8.4 to 81.3 ± 7.7 mm Hg (p < 0.001) and systemic vascular resistance from 2,406 ± 603 to 1,693 ± 261 dynes sec cm^?5 (p < 0.001). Heart rate was unchanged. The onset of action ranged from 30 to 120 minutes and the duration of action from 4 to 7 hours after a single oral administration. After 24 hours of continuous therapy, no tachyphylaxis to amrinone was observed. A correlation (r = 0.62, p < 0.001) was found between the oral dose of amrinone and the percent increase in cardiac index. Left ventricular ejection fraction, determined in five patients, increased from 14 ± 8 to 21 ± 8 percent (p < 0.01). Effective renal plasma flow, measured in six patients, increased from 186.0 ± 72.0 to 231.1 ± 88.8 ml/min (p < 0.05) and the glomerular filtration rate from 82.2 ± 14.9 to 110.0 ± 20.6 ml/min (p < 0.05). Thus, this study demonstrates the cardiotonic efficacy of orally administered amrinone in human subjects and recommends its further investigation as a therapeutic agent for the continued treatment of congestive heart failure.     

Hemodynamic effects of dobutamine in children.

Dobutamine is useful for augmenting cardiovasuclar function in adults. However, no information is available on the action of dobutamine in children. To determine its hemodynamic effects in children, we infused dobutamine into 12 children with congenital heart disease during diagnostic cardiac catheterization. We administered dobutamine in two doses: first 2 and then 7.75 microgram/kg per min for 10 minutes each. We meaured heart rate, cardiac output, systemic and pulmonary arterial, right atrial and pulmonary capillary blood pressures before and during the infusion of dobutamine. Systemic and pulmonary vascular resistances, cardiac index and stroke index were calculated. Cardiac output, cardiac index, stroke volume, stroke index and systemic arterial phasic and mean blood pressures increased sugnificantly (P less than 0.05) and pulmonary capillary mean blood pressure decreased significantly (P less than 0.05) during the infusion of each dose of dobutamine compared with control values. Heart rate, pulmonary and right atrial mean blood pressure and systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance were unchanged with either dose of dobutamine. We noted no adverse effect from the drug.     

Combined hemodynamic effects of dobutamine and IV nitroglycerin in congestive heart failure

The combined and separate hemodynamic effects of dobutamine and IV nitroglycerin were compared in 12 patients with chronic congestive heart failure (nine with ischemic heart disease, two with idiopathic congestive cardiomyopathy, and one with valvular heart disease). Dobutamine (7.1 micrograms/kg/min) increased cardiac index from 2.4 +/- 0.4 to 3.4 +/- 0.9 L/min/m2 (P < 0.001) and decreased pulmonary wedge pressure from 28 +/- 5 to 16 +/- 4 mm Hg (P < 0.001) while nitroglycerin (127 micrograms/min) alone increased cardia index to 2.8 L/min/m2 (P < 0.001) and decreased wedge pressure to 14.3 mm Hg (P < 0.001). With both drugs, cardiac index increased to 3.5 +/- 0.6 L/min/m2; (NS compared to dobutamine alone) wedge pressure decreased to 11 +/- 4L/min/m2 (P < 0.05 compared to dobutamine alone). Those beneficial hemodynamic effects occurred without a significant change in the double product of heart rate and blood pressure, and were associated with an improvement in the transmyocardial gradient. Thus, the greatly enhanced ventricular performance with dobutamine + nitroglycerin was associated with a better relationship between myocardial oxygen demand and supply.     

Intravenous fenoldopam in heart failure: comparing the hemodynamic effects of dopamine1 receptor agonism with nitroprusside

Dopamine1 receptors mediate hemodynamic effects that may be beneficial in patients with congestive heart failure. We infused the selective dopamine1 receptor agonist, fenoldopam mesylate (SKF 82526 J), to evaluate hemodynamic and neurohumoral changes during continuous intravenous infusion in patients with congestive heart failure and compared them with the effects of nitroprusside, a traditional vasodilator that works by a distinctly different mechanism. In 15 patients with a mean radionuclide ejection fraction of 17%, the agents were infused in a random-ordered, double-blinded, crossover, active drug-controlled protocol after optimal dosing was determined during a titration period. Hemodynamic changes were induced in minutes with both drugs during a mean (+/- standard deviation) infusion dose of 1.45 +/- 1.66 micrograms/kg/min for fenoldopam and 2.99 +/- 1.59 micrograms/kg/min for nitroprusside. At 1 hour, mean blood pressure decreased and cardiac index rose with both drugs, and the effect lasted throughout the 6-hour infusion period. Nitroprusside, but not fenoldopam, reduced right heart filling pressures (including mean pulmonary capillary wedge, mean right atrial, and mean pulmonary artery pressures) during the infusion period. Both drugs caused significant reduction in systemic vascular and pulmonary arteriolar resistances. No significant change occurred in plasma norepinephrine levels. Fenoldopam ameliorates some of the adverse hemodynamic changes that occur during heart failure but does not reduce right heart filling pressures as does nitroprusside. Because of fenoldopam's unique characteristics, it may benefit certain patients with heart failure.     

Development of pharmacodynamic tolerance to prozosin in congestive heart failure.

In order to determine and compare the pharmacodynamic responses to single and multiple dose prazosin therapy in cardiac failure, 14 patients with severe low-output heart failure underwent central and regional hemodynamic measurements after random placement in one of two prazosin dosing schedules. A single 5 mg oral dose of prazosin (Group A, no. = 7) significantly increased the cardiac index and stroke volume index while significantly decreasing systemic, pulmonary and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures and vascular resistances. Hepatic plasma flow and limb blood flow increased after the single dose. Striking attenuation of these hemodynamic effects occurred when the same dose was administered after 24 hours of pretreatment with oral prazosin, 2 mg every 8 hours (Group B, no. = 7). The plasma prazosin levels of the two groups, drawn 2 hours after administration, were 24.5 and 30.5 ng/ml, respectively. Repeated administration of prazosin in patients with congestive heart failure results in rapid attenuation of its beneficial central and regional hemodynamic effects. The usefulness of this vasodilator as a preload- and afterload-reducing agent in the clinical setting of chronic congestive heart failure may be limited by the development of pharmacodynamic tolerance.