Quelle est la place de la chirurgie dans la prise en charge des métastases cérébrales en 2020 ?

Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumors and are associated with a dismal prognosis. The management of patients with brain metastases has become more important because of the increased incidence of these tumours, the better treatment of the systemic disease and the improvement of surgical techniques. The treatment requires multidisciplinary approaches and become complex because of new emerging systemic therapy and advancements in neurosurgery and radiation oncology. The surgical treatment has an indispensable role to obtain a tissue diagnosis, in relieving intracranial effect mass and improving neurological status by improving induced encephalopathy. An understanding of the role and indications of the surgery in patients with metastatic brain lesions is essential for the effective management of this growing population.     

Radiosurgery for Intracranial Malignancies

Radiosurgery was historically designed as a technology to be used for the treatment of functional disorders, benign tumors, and vascular malformations. In the last 5 years, malignant lesions have become an increasingly common target for the radiosurgeon. In fact, by 1994 the most common disease treated with radiosurgery in the United States was metastatic disease. Published data suggest that radiosurgery offers excellent local control for intracranial metastatic lesions regardless of location or histology with the majority of patients demonstrating an improved quality of life. Recent information from the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy suggests that radiosurgery compares favorably with interstitial brachytherapy for both recurrent as well as in newly diagnosed patients with malignant gliomas in terms of improved survival and the need of surgery and steroid support for symptomatic radiation changes. Prospective studies (Phase I through III) are ongoing to determine the ultimate role of radiosurgery in the management of patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent malignant gliomas, recurrent pediatric brain tumors disease, and patients with single or multiple intracranial metastases.     

Treatment induced necrosis versus recurrent/progressing brain tumor: going beyond the boundaries of conventional morphologic imaging

Brain tumor patients undergo various combinations therapies, leading to very complex and confusing imaging appearances on follow up MR imaging and hence, differentiating recurrent or progressing tumors from treatment induced necrosis or effects has always been a challenge in neuro-oncologic imaging. This particular topic has become more relevant these days because of the advent of newer anti-angiogenic and anti-neoplastic chemotherapeutic agents as well as use of salvage radiation therapy. Various clinically available functional imaging modalities can provide additional physiologic and metabolic information about the tumors which could be useful in identifying viable tumor from treatment induced necrosis and hence, can guide treatment planning. In this review we will discuss various functional neuro-imaging modalities, their advantages and limitations and also their utility in treatment planning.     

Assessment of the technology for functional imaging in cancer

Functional imaging can address hitherto irresolvable questions about cancer biology in both research and practice. In the clinic, by combining features of systemic and local disease markers into reference standards for the diagnosis of new disease entities functional imaging has the potential to literally redefine illness. Clinical assessments can be conducted at two levels: establishment of new reference standards, and evaluation of successor technologies that will substitute for a reference standard in practice. A union of functional imaging with anatomical criteria of disease has shown great promise in the management of numerous cancers. More work is required to use functional imaging to develop 'functional' approaches to diagnosis and therapy. Many methodologies exist for the acquisition of primary data on imaging technology efficacy. A form of economic cost-effectiveness modelling called iterative decision analysis can be used to set research and service priorities. Cancer clinicians need to take an increased role in functional imaging research, as they have primary expertise in the development and use of treatments modifying cell and tissue function.     

Radiotherapy of non-tumoral refractory neurological pathologies

Intracranial radiotherapy has been improved, primarily because of the development of stereotactic approaches. While intracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy is mainly indicated for treatment of benign or malignant tumors, this procedure is also effective in the management of other neurological pathologies; it is delivered using GammaKnife® and linear accelerators. Thus, brain arteriovenous malformations in patients who are likely to experience permanent neurological sequelae can be managed by single session intracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy, or radiosurgery, in specific situations, with an advantageous benefit/risk ratio. Radiosurgery can be recommended for patients with disabling symptoms, which are poorly controlled by medication, such as trigeminal neuralgia, and tremors, whether they are essential or secondary to Parkinson's disease. This literature review aims at defining the place of intracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy in the management of patients suffering from non-tumoral refractory neurological pathologies. It is clear that the multidisciplinary collaboration of experienced teams from Neurosurgery, Neurology, Neuroradiology, Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics is needed for the procedures using high precision radiotherapy techniques, which deliver high doses to locations near functional brain areas.     

The Evolving Role of Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Patients with Spine Tumors

Traditional management strategies for patients with spinal tumors have undergone considerable changes during the last 15 years. Significant improvements in digital imaging, computer processing, and treatment planning have provided the basis for the application of stereotactic techniques, now the standard of care for intracranial pathology, to spinal pathology. In addition, certain of these improvements have also allowed us to progress from frame-based to frameless systems which now act to accurately assure the delivery of high doses of radiation to a precisely defined target volume while sparing injury to adjacent normal tissues. In this article we will describe the evolution from yesterday's standards for radiation therapy to the current state of the art for the treatment of patients with spinal tumors. This presentation will include a discussion of radiation dosing and toxicity, the overall process of extracranial radiation delivery, and the current state of the art regarding Cyberknife, Novalis, and tomotherapy. Additional discussion relating current research protocols and future directions for the management of benign tumors of the spine will also be presented.     

Positron Emission Tomography: A new tool for characterization of malignant disease and selection of therapy

Present therapy for cancer patients is based primarily on tumor histology and anatomy. Despite treatment advances, clinicians have often been frustrated by their inability to assess tumor biology. Metabolic imaging by positron emission tomography is a promising new technology that has opened up a whole realm of study in oncology. Glucose metabolism, hemodynamics, oxygen utilization, protein synthesis and thymidine incorporation may yield valuable data regarding tumor aggressiveness and stage, and allow assessment of tumor response early during treatment, before morphological changes are detectable. Other metabolic determinations, including tumor hypoxia and estrogen receptor density, may predict tumor response to therapy, and lead to selection of more appropriate treatment regimens, such as with neutrons or hypoxic cell sensitizers for documentably hypoxic tumors. While further clinical validation is required, positron emission tomography promises to provide vital information complementary to present anatomical imaging modalities that will aid oncologists in optimal management of their patients.     

The Evolving Role of Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Patients with Spine Tumors

Traditional management strategies for patients with spinal tumors have undergone considerable changes during the last 15years. Significant improvements in digital imaging, computer processing, and treatment planning have provided the basis for the application of stereotactic techniques, now the standard of care for intracranial pathology, to spinal pathology. In addition, certain of these improvements have also allowed us to progress from frame-based to frameless systems which now act to accurately assure the delivery of high doses of radiation to a precisely defined target volume while sparing injury to adjacent normal tissues.In this article we will describe the evolution from yesterdays standards for radiation therapy to the current state of the art for the treatment of patients with spinal tumors.     

Intracranial germ cell tumors

Intracranial germ cell tumors are a heterogeneous group of lesions which occur in children and adults. Within the classification of intracranial germ cell tumors, there are a variety of different tumor types which carry different prognoses. The diagnosis of an intracranial germ cell tumor usually requires histological information, but a subgroup of tumors will secrete specific tumor markers, including alpha-fetoprotein and beta-human chorionic gonadotropin, which may obviate the need for surgical intervention. The management of intracranial germ cell tumors in both children and adults remains unsettled. Germinomas have a good prognosis, as over 90% of patients can be effectively treated with radiation therapy. The dose and volume of radiation therapy needed for disease control is not well established, and controversy exists concerning the need for whole brain or craniospinal radiation therapy for localized tumors. Germinomas are also chemosensitive and recent reports suggest that the dose and volume of radiation therapy required for disease control can be lessened with the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy. The outcome for patients with nongerminomatous germ cell tumors is less favorable. Radiation therapy alone will result in disease control in 40%-60% of patients. The addition of chemotherapy to radiation therapy may improve the rate of survival.     

Stereotactic radiosurgery for benign neoplasms

Over the last decade, the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the treatment of intracranial lesions has grown significantly. In addition to malignant brain tumors and vascular malformations, benign tumors have also been treated with SRS. Although surgical resection has long been considered the gold standard in the management of such benign lesions, the outcomes of SRS in various benign neoplasms appears to be comparable. In this review, we will examine the literature as it pertains to the treatment of benign brain tumors with SRS. Of particular note, we will examine the results of SRS in acoustic neuromas, meningiomas, pituitary adenomas, and other benign tumors.     

Imaging in prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men, in general. Most patients diagnosed with prostate cancer have localized disease confined to the prostate. A small percentage of patients with aggressive tumors will progress to develop local, extracapsular tumor extension and distant metastases. The aim of prostate cancer management is to identify and treat those patients with aggressive disease before they develop locally advanced or metastatic disease, and to avoid overtreating indolent tumors, which are unlikely to be life threatening. Imaging has been shown to be valuable in local staging of prostate cancer and as an aid to the management of clinically significant disease. In this article, we discuss the different established imaging modalities and emerging techniques for prostate cancer imaging in patients with clinically localized disease who may be suitable for radical treatment.     

Multidisciplinary treatment of soft tissue sarcomas: An update

Standard treatment for soft tissue sarcoma, based on complete surgical resection with or without adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy, has not substantially changed during the last several decades. Nevertheless, recent advances have contributed to considerable improvement in the management of these patients; for example, new magnetic resonance imaging sequences such as diffusion-weighted imaging and magnetic resonance imaging radiomics can better assess tumor extension and even estimate its grade. Detection of circulating genetic material (liquid biopsy) and next-generation sequencing are powerful techniques for genetic analysis, which will increase our understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms and may reveal potential therapeutic targets. The role of chemotherapy in non-metastatic disease is still controversial, and there is a need to identify patients who really benefit from this treatment. Novel chemotherapeutic regimens have entered clinical praxis and can change the outcome of patients with metastatic disease. Advances in radiotherapy have helped decrease local adverse effects and sustain good local control of the disease. The following report provides an updated view of the diagnosis, treatment, and future perspectives on the management of patients with soft tissue sarcomas.     

Supportive therapy in neuro-oncology

Patients with cerebral neoplasms often report pain or other kinds of symptoms which, even though not directly connected to the disease itself, can cause complications in the approach to therapy and worsen the quality of life of the patients. The therapies aimed at controlling these kinds of disturbances are referred to as supportive therapies as they do not cure the underlying disease. However, these therapies should not be underestimated, because, by controlling these disturbances, they are able not only to greatly improve the quality of life of the neuro-oncologic patients but also increase their survival. Based on this hypothesis, we will discuss and examine the drugs more frequently used for supportive therapy in neuro-oncologic patients. We assert, in fact, that the desire to offer neuro-oncologic patients better assistance guarantees not only adequate specialized input from the health operators involved, concerning the quality of life and the uniqueness of the 'person-patient', but also the ability to be able to listen to the patients, understand their choices and allow them to express their priorities.     

Long-term survivors after gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery, with or without whole-brain radiation therapy, has become a valued management choice for patients with brain metastases, although their median survival remains limited. In patients who receive successful extracranial cancer care, patients who have controlled intracranial disease are living longer. The authors evaluated all brain metastasis in patients who lived for > or = 4 years after radiosurgery to determine clinical and treatment patterns potentially responsible for their outcome. METHODS: Six hundred seventy-seven patients with brain metastases underwent 781 radiosurgery procedures between 1988 and 2000. Data from the entire series were reviewed; and, if patients had > or = 4 years of survival, then they were evaluated for information on brain and extracranial treatment, symptoms, imaging responses, need for further care, and management morbidity. These long-term survivors were compared with a cohort who lived for < 3 months after radiosurgery (n = 100 patients). RESULTS: Forty-four patients (6.5%) survived for > 4 years after radiosurgery (mean, 69 mos with 16 patients still alive). The mean age at radiosurgery was 53 years (maximum age, 72 yrs), and the median Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was 90. The lung (n = 15 patients), breast (n = 9 patients), kidney (n = 7 patients), and skin (melanoma; n = 6 patients) were the most frequent primary sites. Two or more organ sites outside the brain were involved in 18 patients (41%), the primary tumor plus lymph nodes were involved in 10 patients (23%), only the primary tumor was involved in 9 patients (20%), and only brain disease was involved in 7 patients (16%), indicating that extended survival was possible even in patients with multiorgan disease. Serial imaging of 133 tumors showed that 99 tumors were smaller (74%), 22 tumors were unchanged (17%), and 12 tumors were larger (9%). Four patients had a permanent neurologic deficit after brain tumor management, and six patients underwent a resection after radiosurgery. Compared with the patients who had limited survival (< 3 mos), long-term survivors had a higher initial KPS (P = 0.01), fewer brain metastases (P = 0.04), and less extracranial disease (P < 0.00005). CONCLUSIONS: Although the expected survival of patients with brain metastases may be limited, selected patients with effective intracranial and extracranial care for malignant disease can have prolonged, good-quality survival. The extent of extracranial disease at the time of radiosurgery was predictive of outcome, but this does not necessarily mean that patients cannot live for years if treatment is effective.     

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications in hydrocephalus patients with intracranial tumors: an analysis of relevant risk factors

Patients with intracranial tumors are predisposed to persistent hydrocephalus, often requiring a permanent CSF diversion procedure with shunts. This study reviews the long-term experience with ventriculoperitoneal shunts for the management of hydrocephalus in patients with intracranial tumors. Patients with intracranial tumors who underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement for hydrocephalus from October 1990 to October 2009 were included in this study. During the 19-year period, medical charts, operative reports, imaging studies, and clinical follow- up evaluations were reviewed and analyzed retrospectively for all patients. A total of 187 intracranial tumor patients with hydrocephalus were included. The median follow up was 391 days. Malignant tumors were present in 40% of the patients. Overall shunt failure was 27.8%. Single shunt revision occurred in 13% of the patients and 14% had multiple shunt revision. Tumor histology, age and a procedure prior to shunt placement (ventriculostomy/Ommaya reservoirs) were significantly associated with the shunt revisions. Shunt system replacement and proximal shunt complication were significantly attributed to multiple shunt revisions. The overall shunt revision within 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 5 years was 17.7%, 18.7%, 19.8% and 24.1%, respectively. The results of the study demonstrate that VP shunting is an effective for the management of hydrocephalus in patients with intracranial tumors. The overall incidence of shunt revision was 27.8%. Age, tumor histology, and a procedure prior to shunt placement (ventriculostomy/Ommaya reservoirs) were significantly associated with the shunt revisions. Additional studies using minimally invasive techniques are being explored for the management of hydrocephalus in patients with intracranial tumors.     

Update on low malignant potential ovarian tumors

Low malignant potential (LMP) ovarian tumors represent a small subset of epithelial ovarian cancers that were first identified 70 years ago but were recognized in a systematic way only within the last 30 years. These lesions afflict women at a much younger age than invasive ovarian cancer, behave in a more indolent manner, and have a much more favorable prognosis. The management of women with LMP tumors is primarily surgical; adjuvant therapy plays little role in early disease and its use in advanced disease is not well defined. Ongoing investigations are attempting to define prognostic factors that may assist clinicians in the appropriate application of postoperative therapy.     

Stereotactic radiosurgery: a meta-analysis of current therapeutic applications in neuro-oncologic disease

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) represents an important tool in neurosurgery and radiotherapy for addressing a multitude of diseases, most notably in the field of neuro-oncology. The pathologies for which it is employed vary significantly, and few controlled studies exist to evaluate its efficacy. We aimed to provide a quantitative meta-analysis of SRS applications in neuro-oncology, providing benchmarks for expected outcomes. The meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with established standards for evaluating observational data. Specific inclusion criteria were utilized, search terms recorded, and data extracted to summarize demographic and outcome statistics. Meta-analysis was conducted where statistically appropriate, and clinical outcomes summarized as tumor stability, survival, and complications in a pathology-specific manner. For vestibular schwannoma, 37 studies with a total 3,677 patients were included. Overall disease stabilization rate after adjustment for significant publication bias was 91.1%. Non-cranial nerve complication rate after publication bias adjustment was 5.6%. Accounting for publication bias, rate of hearing preservation was with 59.3%. For 456 glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients in 11 studies receiving SRS, median survival from diagnosis was 13.5–26 months, while overall complication rate was 11.4%. For meningioma, 15 studies with a total 2,734 patients were included; 77.1% were classified as skull base. Overall disease stabilization rate was 89.0, while overall complication rate was 7.0%. For metastatic disease, 27 studies with a total of 2,679 patients were included. Overall median survival from time of SRS was 5–14 months, overall 1-year survival rates were 15–54.9%, while reported local disease control rates were 59.6–96.8%. Stereotactic radiosurgery is an increasingly important tool in the management of neuro-oncologic diseases. While there is a pathology-specific role for SRS, current data show excellent results in treating several pathologies. As such, SRS adds significantly to the neurosurgical armamentarium for treating neuro-oncologic processes.     

Diagnostic imaging advances in neurooncology

As we move into the 1990s, the field of diagnostic imaging displays greater usefulness as a result of continued technical improvements in existing modalities and the discovery of new techniques. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is now, without question, the imaging modality of choice for evaluation of tumors of the brain and spine. The general availability of the MR imaging contrast agent, gadolinium diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-DTPA), for the last three years has greatly expanded the role of MR imaging. Progress in metabolic imaging and MR spectroscopy may offer yet greater understanding of the physiology of brain tumors and has application for the diagnosis and posttreatment follow-up of these patients. These topics will be addressed in this review, which spans the years 1989 and 1990.     

Controversies in the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Major advances in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal tumors (GISTs) have improved survival for both patients with advanced disease and those diagnosed with high‐risk primary tumors. The Consensus approaches to best practice management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors, published in this journal in 2008, provided guidance for the management of GIST to both clinicians and regulatory authorities. Since then, clinical trials have demonstrated the benefit of adjuvant imatinib in high‐risk patients, and mature data from advanced GIST studies suggest that a small but significant proportion of patients with advanced disease can achieve long‐term benefit with ongoing imatinib treatment. Other evolving management strategies include the controversial use of palliative or debulking surgery to improve outcomes in advanced GIST and the development of promising new multikinase inhibitors, such as regorafenib, which has established benefit in the third‐line setting. This review provides an update of recent developments in GIST management and discusses new controversies that these advances have generated.