美国新毕业家庭医生寻找产科相关工作的体验

背景　足够的产科家庭医生对于确保患者获取必需的产科服务至关重要。然而,既往研究表明执业范围包含产科的家庭医生数量正在逐年减少,如今从事新生儿接生工作的家庭医生不到10%。目的　旨在探究希望将产科纳入其执业范围的新毕业家庭医生如何发现和选择工作,并进一步了解当前就业形势对家庭医生的执业范围,特别是产科、新生儿接生方面的影响。方法　于2017年进行问卷调查和定性访谈的混合方法研究。对美国家庭医生进行电子问卷调查并在目的性子抽样后对这些医生进行深度半结构化电话访谈。问卷调查总结了家庭医生未从事产科工作的原因,为进一步明确选择从事产科工作的家庭医生的具体情况,采用基于群体的沉浸式方法来转译定性访谈的结果。本研究向2 098例毕业于2014-2016年并希望从事新生儿接生工作的美国家庭医学专业实习医生发送调查问卷,回复1 016份,回复率48.43%,其中56例接受了电话访谈。结果　问卷调查结果显示,未能找到工作范围包含产科的工作是希望从事产科工作的家庭医学毕业生未从事该工作的主要原因。定性访谈结果显示,家庭医生通常通过人脉关系或人才招聘的途径找到产科相关工作,并根据地理位置偏好、家庭义务及生活方式要求等个人考虑因素做出选择。同时,求职过程和择业决策也受到工作结构、执业特点及缺乏产科相工作经验等因素的限制。结论　虽然个人意向决定大部分医学生的工作选择,但其选择仍受到多种不可控因素限制,特别是家庭医学工作提供产科相关工作的能力。美国毕业医学生从医院实习生到执业医师的转变同时影响着毕业生的求职选择和医疗机构患者寻求医疗服务的质量。因此,了解就业情况对家庭医生就业范围的影响方式,有助于进一步明确如何协助家庭医生在其希望从事的范围内工作并对其进行相应协助,从而确保每一个家庭可以获得更好的医疗服务。     

Correlates of certification in family medicine in the billing patterns of Ontario general practitioners.

There is conflicting evidence as to whether physicians who are certified in family medicine practise differently from their noncertified colleagues and what those differences are. We examined the extent to which certification in family medicine is associated with differences in the practice patterns of primary care physicians as reflected in their billing patterns. Billing data for 1986 were obtained from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan for 269 certified physicians and 375 noncertified physicians who had graduated from Ontario medical schools between 1972 and 1983 and who practised as general practitioners or family physicians in Ontario. As a group, certificants provided fewer services per patient and billed less per patient seen per month. They were more likely than noncertificants to include counselling, psychotherapy, prenatal and obstetric care, nonemergency hospital visits, surgical services and visits to chronic care facilities in their service mix and to bill in more service categories. Certificants billed more for prenatal and obstetric care, intermediate assessments, chronic care and nonemergency hospital visits and less for psychotherapy and after-hours services than noncertificants. Many of the differences detected suggest a practice style consistent with the objectives for training and certification in family medicine. However, whether the differences observed in our study and in previous studies are related more to self-selection of physicians for certification or to the types of educational experiences cannot be directly assessed.     

Factors associated with the decision of family physicians to provide intrapartum care.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate which characteristics and beliefs of family physicians determine their decision to provide intrapartum care. DESIGN: Confidential survey questionnaire mailed in spring 1993. SETTING: Alberta and Ontario. SUBJECTS: Random selection of 207 physicians who had graduated from medical school between 1953 and 1990 and were thought to be in family or general practice. Of 178 eligible physicians, usable replies were received from 104 (58.4%). OUTCOME MEASURES: Beliefs (measured on a 7-point Likert scale) about the relevance of 16 primary factors to the type of obstetric care provided; demographic, training and practice characteristics. RESULTS: The respondents who provided intrapartum care differed from those who did not in their beliefs about the availability of a local hospital suitable for intrapartum care (p < 0.001), their practice partners' views on the role of family physicians in providing obstetric care (p < 0.002), their own concept of the role of family physicians in providing obstetric care (p < 0.001) and women's views on the type of obstetric care they want (p < 0.002). They also differed, although less significantly, in their beliefs about the adequacy of their obstetric training before entering family practice (p < 0.04), the expected effects of providing obstetric care on their free time (p < 0.006), their fear of malpractice litigation (p < 0.028) and their perceived competence in performing practical obstetric procedures (p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that certain secondary factors were particularly relevant to the respondents' provision of intrapartum care at present. These included the physician's perceived competence at managing postpartum maternal hemorrhage (odds ratio [OR] 48.90, 90% confidence interval [CI] 4.70 to 509), the belief that medical insurance premiums should not be affected by the type of obstetric care provided (OR 3.55, 90% CI 1.67 to 7.57]) and the number of practice partners who provided intrapartum care (OR 10.08, 90% CI 2.31 to 44.10). CONCLUSION: Several factors appear to influence family physicians in their decision to provide intrapartum care. This information will help to focus efforts to provide appropriate obstetric training for family practice residents and to retain involvement of family physicians in intrapartum care.     

Compliance with screening mammography. Survey of primary care physicians

A survey of primary care physicians in the greater Tampa Bay metropolitan area was conducted to determine compliance with screening mammography and associated physician characteristics. Information requested included their age, sex, specialty, and board certification status, and the ages and frequencies that they recommend screening mammography for their patients. A total of 565 physicians responded. Even though 88% indicated they follow American Cancer Society recommendations when advising screening mammography, only 62% were actually in full compliance. A significantly greater percentage of obstetricians/gynecologists were compliant (74%) compared to other specialties (family practice, 57%, p = .006; internal medicine, 56%, p = .007; general practice, 53%, p = .003). Women physicians were more likely to be compliant than men (83% versus 58%, p less than .001), and younger physicians more likely than older physicians (72% versus 49%, p less than .001). There was no significant difference in compliance rates between board certified and noncertified physicians.     

Differences in intrapartum obstetric care provided to women at low risk by family physicians and obstetricians.

To determine differences in practice style and to examine maternal and neonatal outcomes, we reviewed the hospital charts of 1115 women admitted by family physicians and 1250 women admitted by obstetricians who gave birth at one of three teaching hospitals in Toronto between April 1985 and March 1986. All the women in the two groups were categorized retrospectively as being at low risk at the onset of labour on the basis of their prenatal records and their admission histories and physical examination results. There were higher proportions of younger women and women of lower socioeconomic status in the family physician group than in the obstetrician group (p less than 0.001). The rates of interventions, including artificial rupture of the membranes, induction, augmentation, low forceps plus vacuum extraction, episiotomy and epidural anesthesia, were all higher in the obstetrician group. The mean birth weight and the cesarean section rate were the same in the two groups. Differences in labour and delivery outcomes between the two groups, including a higher rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery for the family physicians, reflected a more "expectant" practice style by family doctors. However, there were no significant differences in the rates of maternal or neonatal complications. A practice style characterized by a higher rate of interventions was not associated with improved maternal or newborn outcome in this low-risk setting.     

Effects of residency training in family medicine v. internship training on professional attitudes and practice patterns.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the professional attitudes and practice patterns of physicians with residency training in family medicine differ from those of generalists with internship training. DESIGN: Mail survey conducted in 1985-86. SETTING: Province of Quebec. PARTICIPANTS: A stratified random sample of French-speaking family and general practitioners who graduated after 1972 (325 physicians with residency training and 304 with internship training) (response rate 82%). MAIN RESULTS: Physicians with residency training were 3 years younger on average than those with internship training, were more likely to be female (38% v. 18%, p less than 0.001) and were more likely to work on a salaried basis in CLSCs (public community health centres) (36% v. 14%, p less than 0.001). Even after these confounding factors were controlled for, physicians with residency training seemed to be more sensitive to the psychosocial aspects of patient care and tended to attach more importance to informing patients about useful materials and resources concerning their health problems. They were not, however, more likely to value health counselling or integrate it in medical practice. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide some evidence that the new requirement that physicians complete a residency in family medicine to obtain medical licensure in general practice in Quebec may foster a more patient-centred approach to health care.     

Public policy and the supply of primary care physicians

The decline in general practice, the arrested growth of family medicine training programs, and the increased subspecialization of internal medicine and pediatrics are responsible for the continuing decrease in the proportion of physicians in the United States who practice a primary care specialty. Since 1963, the number of physicians has more than doubled, but the ratio of office-based primary care physicians to the national population has decreased. This trend has been especially pronounced in rural areas and impoverished urban communities. There is evidence that the proportion of young physicians entering primary care specialties is declining. Medical education has become increasingly reliant on service income, making it difficult to fund training in primary care specialties. Grants for graduate training in primary care specialties have not increased with inflation, and outright elimination of these programs is under consideration. Public programs that fund medical education must be reformed to improve the geographic and specialty distribution of physicians.     

Quality of care in family practice: does residency training make a difference?

As the proportion of physicians who enter residency training in family practice steadily increases, so does the need to evaluate the impact of their training and postgraduate education on the quality of care in their practices. We audited the practices of 120 randomly selected family physicians in Ontario, who were separated into four groups: nonmembers of the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC), members of the CFPC with no certification in family medicine, certificated members without residency training in family medicine and certificated members with residency training in family medicine. The practices were assessed according to predetermined criteria for charting, procedures in periodic health examination, quality of medical care and use of indicator drugs. Generally the scores were significantly higher for CFPC members with residency training in family medicine than for those in the other groups, nonmembers having the lowest scores. Patient questionnaires indicated no difference in satisfaction with specific aspects of care between the four groups. Self-selection into residency training and CFPC membership may account for some of the results; nevertheless, the findings support the contention that residency training in family medicine should be mandatory for family physicians.     

Wisconsin's family physician shortage

This paper analyzes current and future needs for primary care physicians--particularly family practice physicians--in Wisconsin in light of predictions of a national physician glut by the year 1990. The current shortfall of family physicians is estimated to be at least 150, with the most severe deficits found in rural and underserved urban areas. Forty-nine to 79 family practice physicians will be needed each year to meet the growing demand and to replace losses due to retirement, speciality change, and other factors. At the current rate of training, 63 new family physicians will enter practice each year; it appears that the current deficit will be made up slowly, if at all. The number of primary care specialists appears unlikely to increase due to the declining interest in the speciality among medical students; only half the number of new family physicians entering practice each year will enter practice in 1994, resulting in an additional shortfall of about 30 to 50 family physicians each year. Programs should be undertaken at medical schools to bolster student interest in family practice and primary care.     

Opinions of physicians assisting births in Ottawa-Carleton about the licensing of midwives.

The Ontario Ministry of Health announced in January 1986 that midwives would be licensed to practise in Ontario. In September of that year we surveyed all physicians in Ottawa-Carleton who were assisting at births to determine their opinions on midwifery. A total of 78 (74%) of the eligible physicians completed the questionnaire. Almost half thought that midwives should be licensed. Most felt that midwives should be trained as nurses first and should work under the supervision of a physician in hospital-based clinics or in a group practice with physicians. A small proportion thought that midwives should be able to practise as independent practitioners. Some obstetricians thought that legalization of midwifery would allow them to concentrate on high-risk obstetrics, and some family physicians thought this would make it easier for them to continue to be involved in maternity care. Those opposed to the introduction of midwives did not think the public would benefit, and some were concerned that midwives would reduce the size of their own obstetric practices.     

Midwifery defined by physicians, nurses and midwives: the birth of a consensus?

OBJECTIVE: To describe the form of midwifery practice preferred by physicians practising obstetrics, nurses providing maternity care and midwives. DESIGN: Mail survey conducted in 1991. SETTING: Province of Quebec. PARTICIPANTS: A systematic random sample of 844 physicians, 808 nurses and 92 midwives; 597, 723 and 92 respectively completed the questionnaire, for an overall response rate of 80%. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Midwife training options, range of responsibilities, location of midwifery care, relationship to other maternity care providers and degree of autonomy. RESULTS: Most of the physicians, nurses and midwives surveyed agreed that if midwifery was legalized, midwives should have a university degree, provide basic care to women with normal pregnancy and delivery, provide prenatal and postnatal care in hospitals and community health centres, perform delivery in hospitals and work in close collaboration with the other maternity care professionals. Disagreement existed concerning the level of university training required, the need for training in nursing first, the scope of medical intervention performed by midwives, out-of-hospital delivery, the autonomy of midwives and control over their practice. CONCLUSION: Some consensus on midwifery practice exists between physicians, nurses and midwives. In jurisdictions where opposition to midwives is strong, such consensus could serve as the starting point for the introduction of midwifery.     

国外农村基层医师医学培养项目实施现状、成效及评价的系统综述

背景　2010年我国农村订单定向医学生免费培养工作启动，旨在为农村地区培养具备本科学历的全科医生，缓解农村地区基层医师匮乏的现状。本研究通过系统综述了解国外类似项目的实施现状、成效及评价，为我国农村订单定向医学生培养工作评价和改善提供理论参考。目的　了解国外农村基层医师医学培养项目实施现状、成效及评价指标方法等。方法　2019年2-7月，采用系统综述的方法，以“医学教育”“医学教育+医学本科生”“医学院校教育”“医学生”“住院医师规范化培训”“医学专业+人力资源”“农村地区”“农村基层医疗服务”“医师执业地点”“农村基层医师”“农村基层医师培养”“农村医学实习”“农村临床见习”为检索词，检索Ovid MEDLINE、PubMed、Cochrane及Google Scholar主要英文数据库，获取2000-01-01至2019-01-01发表的关于全球农村基层医师院校教育及住院医师培训等项目的实施现状、成效及评价的英文文献。结果　最终纳入53篇文献，分别来自美国、加拿大、澳大利亚、日本、泰国及南非6个国家，包括20个院校教育项目和6个住院医师培训项目。文献显示各国农村基层医师培养项目均具有指向性招生策略、面向农村卫生和全科医学的临床课程体系、以农村执业的家庭医生为临床导师及农村地区临床实践基地等要素；培养项目学生选择家庭医学为执业专业、农村地区执业率和长期农村保留率均明显高于非培养项目学生，两者国家医疗执照考试成绩和通过率无明显差异。长期农村地区临床实践培训、招生策略倾斜农村成长背景学生及农村执业的家庭医生导师是影响项目最终效果的关键因素。结论　医学教育是解决农村基层医师匮乏的有效途径。国外农村基层医师培养项目的招生策略、临床课程体系设置、导师指导及评价可为我国农村订单定向医学生培养工作提供有益参考。     

A survey of postgraduate training for family practice

The results of a survey of Canadian primary care physicians for the Canadian Medical Association (CMA's) Task Force on Education for the Provision of Primary Care Services are reported. Recent Canadian medical school graduates in primary care practice reported that the three major training routes (rotating and mixed internships and family medicine residencies) each prepared them differently for practice. The graduates of 2-year family medicine residencies were more satisfied with their preparation than were the graduates of the other major training routes. A 2- or 3-year family medicine residency was preferred by 50% of the respondents, although only 33% of them had actually taken one of these routes. There was considerable agreement in the respondents' assessments of the types of postgraduate education needed for primary care practice. The results of this survey were consistent with the recommendations in the final report of the CMA's task force.     

Location of medical education and choice of location of practice

The geographical distribution of physicians is affected by a number of factors, including the location of their medical education. The authors of the present paper examined the physicians' decisions on where to locate after they completed their training by determining where a state's practicing physicians come from and whether physicians who are trained in a state practice in that state or out of state. The results indicated a positive correlation between location of training and location of practice. Women physicians and general/family practitioners were most likely to remain in the state where they received their graduate medical education. The results also suggested that medical schools and graduate medical education programs are vehicles through which a state can attract physicians who will practice there.     

Home care services as teaching sites for geriatrics in family medicine residencies

Evaluating the physical and psychological constitution of elderly patients and their social and cultural environments requires skills that should be taught to all physicians in training. A survey was conducted among all accredited U.S. residency programs in family medicine to examine training in geriatrics. The teaching sites most commonly used by the responding programs were the family practice center (used by 96.4 percent), nursing home (81.9 percent), family medicine inpatient ward (62.4 percent), and home care service (HCS) (48.2 percent). The professional most frequently in contact with the resident during training at an HCS was the attending physician. Longitudinal rotations (that is, long-term rotations involving part of each week for months or years) in geriatrics were used more often than block rotations. The HCS rotations ranked highest in residents' evaluations were those in which the resident followed patients long-term and discussed problems and management with a multidisciplinary team. A combined rotation involving a family practice center, a family medicine inpatient ward, and a home care service is discussed as an alternative method of teaching geriatrics in family medicine.     

Career changes among Saskatchewan physicians.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how often Saskatchewan physicians changed career paths during medical training and practice. DESIGN: Population survey (mailed questionnaire). SETTING: Saskatchewan. PARTICIPANTS: All 1077 active members of the Saskatchewan Medical Association were sent a questionnaire; 493 (45.8%) responded. OUTCOME MEASURES: Long-term career goal or plan in next-to-last year of undergraduate medical school, probable choice of career if forced to choose at that time, and number of physicians who changed their field of training or practice at any time since graduation. RESULTS: In all, 57.8% (237/410) of the respondents were currently practising in a field different from that planned in their next-to-last year of medical school, 63.5% (275/436) were not practising in the field they would have chosen if forced to at that time, and 42.9% (211/492) had changed their field of training or practice at some time since graduation. Older physicians, those who graduated outside of Canada and specialists were the most likely to have changed career paths, family physicians, and those who graduated in Saskatchewan were the least likely to have changed. CONCLUSION: The current system of postgraduate training in Canada does not permit career changes of the sort made by most of the practising Saskatchewan physicians in the survey sample. The implications of this new system are as yet unknown but require careful monitoring.     

The consultation process and physician satisfaction: review of referral patterns in three urban family practice units.

To improve communication in the referral process a standard referral form was composed that seeks to involve the patient in the referral process. It has been well received by the consulted physicians, the family practitioners who use it in everyday office parctice and the patients. A review of referral patterns in general practice showed many similarities from practice to practice and from country to country. Ophthalmologists were the most frequently consulted, followed by obstetricians and gynecologists, general surgeons, otolaryngologists and orthopedic surgeons. A follow-up assessment of referral outcome revealed a poor response from the teaching clinics of one tertiary-care hospital to the referring physicians. This resulted in a substantial decrease in the proportion of patients referred from one family practice unit to the hospital over a 3-year period.     

Physician supply and distribution in Georgia

Physician supply in Georgia must be considered an urgent issue. Several important points must be recognized and addressed. The lowest physicians rates are in the more rural county population groupings. The only county population grouping with a surplus of physicians is in the over 150,000 population. The majority of physicians are concentrated in the metropolitan counties. Sixteen percent of all physicians practice in the 134 counties having less than 50,000 population. The majority of physicians are in primary care specialties. Family practice is the most dominant specialty in rural areas. By the year 2000, Georgia can expect to add 5,600 physicians due to growth. By the year 2000, Georgia can expect to lose 2,600 physicians due to retirement. Family practitioners are the most uniformly distributed of the specialties examined. They are also the specialty most needed. The average age of Georgia physicians is 46. General surgeons are in the oldest average age group (50), whereas internists are in the youngest (44). Older physicians are concentrated in the more rural areas. A significant number of all physicians are over age 55. The majority of these will be retired by the year 2000. Physicians over age 65 represent 9.2% of all physicians from the survey. In Georgia, 13.6% of all physicians were Foreign Medical School Graduates. They tend to locate their practices in medically underserved areas. The specialty choices most frequently favored by FMGs are: pediatrics, internal medicine, family practice, and obstetrics/gynecology. A total of 71.2% of all physicians accept Medicare patients; 83.8% accept Medicare patients. Ninety-two percent of all obstetricians accept obstetric patients, but this participation is threatened by problems with malpractice insurance.     

Family physicians' perceptions of health manpower needs in West Virginia.

West Virginia family physicians feel that they are able to assess the health care needs of their communities. There is a need for more physicians in all of the major specialties in West Virginia, but the largest numbers of physicians are needed in family practice and obstetrics. More registered nurses and licensed practical nurses are needed than any other health care professionals. Twenty-five percent of the respondents are actively recruiting associates, and 48 percent have seriously considered leaving, or are leaving West Virginia. The most commonly cited reasons for leaving are inadequate reimbursement, the state's economy, SB-576, lack of tort reform, and state government in general. The greatest advantage given to practicing in the state are its people, the quality of life, and home and family. In addition, the greatest problems are reimbursement, state government, the malpractice climate and the state economy. The survey shows that state government needs to show a good faith effort to enact tort reform to improve relations with physicians. The threat of losing more physicians is real and must be addressed. Improving the climate for the practice of medicine is a viable solution to West Virginia's manpower problems. There is also a need to continue all present health care professional training programs. More emphasis should be placed on recruitment and retention of nursing students. There is expressed support for nurse midwives, nurse practitioners, and physicians' assistants all working under the supervision of physicians. The finding that home and family are frequently listed as advantages to practicing here indicates recruitment and nurturing of students from underserved areas should be increased.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Early intervention for alcohol use: family physicians' motivations and perceived barriers.

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate family physicians' motivations concerning early intervention for alcohol use and their perceived barriers to such intervention. DESIGN: Qualitative study with the use of focus groups and semistructured interviews. SETTING: Community-based, fee-for-service family-medicine practices in London, Ont. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve focus-group participants recruited through telephone contact by two family physicians on the project team. Participants were required to be physicians in family practice in London. Twelve interview participants recruited through a grand-rounds presentation at two local hospitals. Participants were required to be physicians in a community-based family practice in which primary care was not delivered by residents and to have agreed to participate in all phases (e.g., needs assessment, training and evaluation) of a training program on interventions to help patients reduce alcohol consumption or quit smoking. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Motivations concerning early intervention for alcohol use and perceived barriers to such intervention, as identified by physicians. RESULTS: Physicians in the focus groups and those interviewed endorsed their role in helping patients to reduce alcohol consumption and cited several reasons for the importance of that role. There was strong support for viewing alcohol use as a lifestyle issue to be dealt with in the context of a holistic approach to patient care. Participants cited many barriers to fulfilling their role and were particularly concerned about the appropriateness of asking all adolescent and adult patients about alcohol use, even at visits intended to discuss other issues and concerns. Physicians gave several motivations for improving their work in reduction of alcohol consumption, including their current frustration with the lack of a systematic strategy or tangible materials to help them identify and manage patients. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions with patients who use alcohol should be framed in the context of a holistic approach to family medicine. Qualitative knowledge of the motivations and barriers affecting physicians can inform future research and educational strategies in this area.