Influence of Laser‐Microtextured Surface Collar on Marginal Bone Loss and Peri‐Implant Soft Tissue Response: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Background: A laser‐microtextured surface (LMS) dental implant collar appears to promote a more tooth‐like gingival collagen fiber attachment, which may help to stabilize peri‐implant tissues. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the clinical effect of an LMS versus non‐LMS collar on crestal bone level and peri‐implant soft tissue response. Methods: Electronic and manual literature searches were performed by two independent reviewers for articles written in English up to December 2016. Studies were included if they were human clinical trials with the purpose of evaluating the impact of an LMS collar on peri‐implant hard and soft tissues. Cumulative marginal bone loss (MBL), probing depth (PD), and survival rate (SR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to show the performance of LMS implant collars. MBL, PD, and SR data were analyzed with a random effects model to compare the influence of LMS collars with non‐LMS collars (e.g., roughened surface and machined surface). Results: Fifteen human clinical studies (three randomized controlled trials, six cohort studies, and six case series) with 772 implants met the inclusion criteria. For the overall data, the weighted mean MBL was 0.72 mm (95% CI: 0.59 to 0.85 mm), PD was 1.81 mm (95% CI: 1.13 to 2.49 mm), and SR was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95 to 0.98). MBL around an LMS collar was significantly less than around machined‐surface collars (weighted mean difference [WMD]: ?0.77; 95% CI: ?1.01 to ?0.52; I² = 95.2%; P <0.001). PD in the LMS group was significantly shallower than in the machined‐surface group (WMD: ?1.34; 95% CI: ?1.62 to ?1.05; I² = 81.4%; P <0.001). However, no statistically significant difference was detected for MBL between the LMS and roughened‐surface groups (WMD: ?0.04; 95% CI: ?0.16 to 0.08; I² = 0.0%; P = 0.75). No statistically significant difference was found for SR between the LMS and non‐LMS groups (risk ratio: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.04; I² = 0.0%; P = 0.91). Conclusions: Meta‐analysis showed that an LMS collar can reduce the amount of MBL and PD compared with a machined‐surface collar. Due to high heterogeneity between the included studies, results should be interpreted cautiously.     

Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. Part I: A retrospective radiographic evaluation in humans comparing two non-submerged implant designs with different machined collar lengths

BACKGROUND: Experimental studies demonstrated that peri-implant crestal hard and soft tissues are significantly influenced in their apico-coronal position by the rough/smooth implant border as well as the microgap/ interface between implant and abutment/restoration. The aim of this study was to evaluate radiographically the crestal bone level changes around two types of implants, one with a 2.8 mm smooth machined coronal length and the other with 1.8 mm collar. METHODS: In 68 patients, a total of 201 non-submerged titanium implants (101 with a 1.8 mm, 100 with a 2.8 mm long smooth coronal collar) were placed with their rough/smooth implant border at the bone crest level. From the day of surgery up until 3 years after implant placement crestal bone levels were analyzed digitally using standardized radiographs. RESULTS: Bone remodeling was most pronounced during the unloaded, initial healing phase and did not significantly differ between the two types of implants over the entire observation period (P >0.20). Crestal bone loss for implants placed in patients with poor oral hygiene was significantly higher than in patients with adequate or good plaque control (P <0.005). Furthermore, a tendency for additional crestal bone loss was detected in the group of patients who had been diagnosed with aggressive periodontitis prior to implant placement (P = 0.058). In both types of implants, sand-blasted, large grit, acid-etched (SLA) surfaced implants tended to have slightly less crestal bone loss compared to titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) surfaced implants, but the difference was not significant (P >0.30). CONCLUSION: The implant design with the shorter smooth coronal collar had no additional bone loss and may help to reduce the risk of an exposed metal implant margin in areas of esthetic concern.     

Peri-implant bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. Part I: a pilot study in dogs

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate bone remodeling and bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) after immediate placement at different levels in relation to the crestal bone of Beagle dogs. Materials and methods: The mandibular bilateral second, third and fourth premolars of six Beagle dogs were extracted and six implants were immediately placed in the hemi‐arches of each dog. Randomly, three cylindrical and three tapered implants were inserted crestally (control group) and 2 mm subcrestally (experimental group). Both groups were treated with a minimal mucoperiosteal flap elevation approach. A gap from the buccal cortical wall to the implant was always left. Three dogs were allowed a 4‐week submerged healing period and the other three an 8‐week submerged healing period. The animals were sacrificed and biopsies were obtained. Biopsies were processed for ground sectioning. Histomorphometric analysis was carried out in order to compare buccal and lingual bone height loss, and BIC between the two groups. Results: All implants osseointegrated clinically and histologically. Healing patterns examined microscopically at 4 and 8 weeks for both groups (crestal and subcrestal) yielded similar qualitative bone findings. The distance from the top of the implant collar to the first BIC in the lingual crest (A–Lc) showed a significant difference (P=0.0313): 1.91 ± 0.2 mm in the control group and 1.08 ± 0.2 mm in the experimental group. There was less bone resorption in subcrestal implants than crestal implants. The mean percentage of newly formed BIC was greater with the cylindrical implant design (46.06 ± 4.09%) than with the tapered design (32.64 ± 3.72%). Conclusion: These findings suggest that apical positioning of the top of the implant does not jeopardize bone crest and peri‐implant tissue remodeling. However, less resorption of the Lc may be expected when implants are placed 2 mm subcrestally. To cite this article:
Negri B, Calvo‐Guirado JL, Pardo‐Zamora G, Ramírez‐Fernández MP, Delgado‐Ruíz RA, Muñoz‐Guzón F. Peri‐implant bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. Part I: a pilot study in dogs.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23 , 2012; 228–235.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02158.x     

Effects of implant design on marginal bone changes around early loaded, chemically modified, sandblasted Acid-etched-surfaced implants: a histologic analysis in dogs

Background: A minimal marginal bone loss around implants during early healing has been considered acceptable. However, the preservation of the marginal bone is related to soft tissue stability and esthetics. Implant designs and surfaces were evaluated to determine their impact on the behavior of the crestal bone. The purpose of this study is to evaluate histologic marginal bone level changes around early loaded, chemically modified, sandblasted acid‐etched–surfaced implants with a machined collar (MC) or no MC (NMC). Methods: Three months after a tooth extraction, 72 sandblasted acid‐etched chemically modified implants were placed in six dogs. Thirty‐six implants had NMC, and 36 implants had a 2.8‐mm MC. All implants were loaded 21 days after placement. For histologic analyses, specimens were obtained at 3 and 12 months. Assessments of the percentage of the total bone‐to‐implant contact and linear measurements of the distance from the shoulder of the implant to the first bone‐to‐implant contact (fBIC) were performed. Based on fBIC measurements, estimates of bone loss were obtained for each implant. A mixed‐model analysis of variance was used to assess the effects of implant type and sacrifice time. Results: All implants achieved osseointegration. The mean bone gain observed around NMC early loaded implants (at 3 months: 0.13 ± 0.37 mm; at 12 months: 0.13 ± 0.44 mm) was significantly different from the mean bone loss for MC early loaded implants (at 3 months: ?0.32 ± 0.70 mm; at 12 months: ?0.79 ± 0.35 mm) at 3 months (P = 0.003) and 12 months (P <0.001). No infrabony component was present at the marginal fBIC around NMC implants in most cases. There were no statistically significant differences among the means of total bone contact for implant types. Conclusions: Chemically modified, sandblasted acid‐etched–surfaced implants with NMC presented crestal bone gain after 3 and 12 months under loading conditions in the canine mandible. The implant design and surface were determinants in the marginal bone level preservation.     

Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible

BACKGROUND: Today, implants are placed using both non-submerged and submerged approaches, and in 1- and 2-piece configurations. Previous work has demonstrated that peri-implant crestal bone reactions differ radiographically under such conditions and are dependent on a rough/smooth implant border in 1-piece implants and on the location of the interface (microgap) between the implant and abutment/restoration in 2-piece configurations. The purpose of this investigation was to examine histometrically crestal bone changes around unloaded non-submerged and submerged 1- and 2-piece titanium implants in a side-by-side comparison. METHODS: A total of 59 titanium implants were randomly placed in edentulous mandibular areas of 5 foxhounds, forming 6 different implant subgroups (types A-F). In general, all implants had a relatively smooth, machined coronal portion as well as a rough, sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) apical portion. Implant types A-C were placed in a non-submerged approach, while types D-F were inserted in a submerged fashion. Type A and B implants were 1-piece implants with the rough/smooth border (r/s) at the alveolar crest (type A) or 1.0 mm below (type B). Type C implants had an abutment placed at the time of surgery with the interface located at the bone crest level. In the submerged group, types D-F, the interface was located either at the bone crest level (type D), 1 mm above (type E), or 1 mm below (type F). Three months after implant placement, abutment connection was performed in the submerged implant groups. At 6 months, all animals were sacrificed. Non-decalcified histology was analyzed by evaluating peri-implant crestal bone levels. RESULTS: For types A and B, mean crestal bone levels were located adjacent (within 0.20 mm) to the rough/smooth border (r/s). For type C implants, the mean distance (+/- standard deviation) between the interface and the crestal bone level was 1.68 mm (+/- 0.19 mm) with an r/s border to first bone-to-implant contact (fBIC) of 0.39 mm (+/- 0.23 mm); for type D, 1.57 mm (+/- 0.22 mm) with an r/s border to fBIC of 0.28 mm (+/- 0.21 mm); for type E, 2.64 mm (+/- 0.24 mm) with an r/s border to fBIC of 0.06 mm (+/- 0.27 mm); and for type F, 1.25 mm (+/- 0.40 mm) with an r/s border to fBIC of 0.89 mm (+/- 0.41 mm). CONCLUSIONS: The location of a rough/smooth border on the surface of non-submerged 1-piece implants placed at the bone crest level or 1 mm below, respectively, determines the level of the fBIC. In all 2-piece implants, however, the location of the interface (microgap), when located at or below the alveolar crest, determines the amount of crestal bone resorption. If the same interface is located 1 mm coronal to the alveolar crest, the fBIC is located at the r/s border. These findings, as evaluated by non-decalcified histology under unloaded conditions, demonstrate that crestal bone changes occur during the early phase of healing after implant placement. Furthermore, these changes are dependent on the surface characteristics of the implant and the presence/absence as well as the location of an interface (microgap). Crestal bone changes were not dependent on the surgical technique (submerged or non-submerged).     

Five‐year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial comparing bone‐level implants with either submerged or transmucosal healing

Aim

To evaluate the long‐term hard and soft tissue peri‐implant tissue stability of bone‐level implants using a different implant placement protocol (submerged versus transmucosal).

Materials and methods

This study was partly a subset analysis of a multicentre study where in 40 patients, a single bone‐level implant with platform switching and a conical implant‐abutment interface was placed either submerged or transmucosal in non‐molar sites. Changes in the peri‐implant tissues between implant placement and 5 years were assessed clinically and radiologically. Patient‐related outcomes were also recorded.

Results

Thirty patients completed the 5‐year follow‐up. Implant survival rate was 100%. The mean radiographic changes in crestal bone levels between baseline and 5 years were 0.59 (0.92) mm and 0.78 (1.03) mm for the submerged and the transmucosal groups, respectively. No statistical significant differences were found between the groups for any of the investigated variables. Peri‐implantitis, defined as changes in the level of crestal bone of ≥2 mm together with bleeding on probing, was only diagnosed in one patient. Patients in both groups were highly satisfied with the treatment received.

Conclusions

Bone‐level implants with submerged or transmucosal healing protocols demonstrated similar outcomes after 5 years. Both protocols yielded optimal clinical and radiographic results when bone‐level implants were placed in non‐molar positions for single tooth replacement.     

Effect of interimplant distance (2 and 3 mm) on the height of interimplant bone crest: a histomorphometric evaluation

Background: Implants restored according to a platform‐switching concept (implant abutment interface with a reduced diameter relative to the implant platform diameter) present less crestal bone loss than implants restored with a standard protocol. When implants are placed adjacent to one another, this bone loss may combine through overlapping, thereby causing loss of the interproximal height of bone and papilla. The present study compares the effects of two interimplant distances (2 and 3 mm) on bone maintenance when bone‐level implants with platform‐switching are used. Methods: This study evaluates marginal bone level preservation and soft tissue quality around a bone‐level implant after 2 months of healing in minipig mandibles. The primary objective is to evaluate histologically and histomorphometrically the affect that an implant design with a horizontally displaced implant–abutment junction has on the height of the crest of bone, between adjacent implants separated by two different distances. Results: Results show that the interproximal bone loss measured from the edge of the implant platform to the bone crest was not different for interimplant distances of 2 or 3 mm. The horizontal position of the bone relative to the microgap on platform level (horizontal component of crestal bone loss) was 0.31 ± 0.3 mm for the 2‐mm interimplant distance and 0.57 ± 0.51 mm above the platform 8 weeks after implantation for the 3‐mm interimplant distance. Conclusions: This study shows that interimplant bone levels can be maintained at similar levels for 2‐ and 3‐mm distances. The horizontally displaced implant–abutment junction provided for a more coronal position of the first point of bone–implant contact. The study reveals a smaller horizontal component at the crest of bone than has been reported for non‐horizontally displaced implant–abutment junctions.     

Clinical and radiographic study of implant treatment outcome in periodontally susceptible and non-susceptible patients: a prospective long-term study

Objectives: To evaluate the implant survival rate, periodontal and radiographic parameters of non‐submerged screw implants with two different surfaces (TPS and SLA) in periodontally non‐susceptible patients (NSP) and in patients with chronic adult periodontitis (CAP) or with generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAP). Material and methods: In 110 healthy partially edentulous subjects, 68 patients with CAP and 16 patients with GAP, a total of 513 implants were installed and followed for on average 48.1±25.9 months. Only fixed partial dentures were used as suprastructures. All patients were offered a supportive periodontal maintenance program. Smoking habits, health impairment, plaque score, bleeding on probing (BOP), type of surface, bone score, bone loss on radiographs and the number of failed implants were noted. Results: Implant survival in the NSP and CAP group was 98% and 96% after 140 months (NS), but only 80% after 100 months in the GAP group (P=0.0026). The overall rate of implant loss was 4.7%, but 15.25% in the GAP group (6/16 patients). The average marginal bone loss for all implants was 0.12±0.71 mm on the mesial side and 0.11±0.68 mm on the distal side. Bone loss/year was 0.08±0.31 and 0.07±0.3 mm in the NSP group, but 0.17±0.2 and 0.17±0.19 mm in the GAP group. Only in the GAP group, was bone loss significantly related to BOP, age, inflammation, presence of plaque, probing depth. Implants with a TPS surface had a lower survival than implants with an SLA surface (93% vs. 97%; P=0.06), especially in the GAP group (80% vs. 83%; P=0.005). Smoking habits had a significant influence on implant survival only in the GAP group (P=0.07), declining in current smokers to 63%, and to 78% in former smokers. Overall, impaired general health had no significant influence (P=0.85). However, impaired health further reduced implant survival in the GAP group (survival: 71%). In a statistical model to predict the chance for implant failing, only periodontal classification (P=0.012) and implant surface type (P=0.027) were significant. Conclusion: Periodontally healthy patients and patients with CAP show no difference in peri‐implant variables and implant survival rate, but patients with GAP have more peri‐implant pathology, more marginal bone loss and a lower implant survival implant rate. SLA surface had a better prognosis than the TPS surface.     

Retrospective Evaluation of Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants With Reduced Abutment Diameter Placed Non‐Submerged and at Subcrestal Positions: The Effect of Bone Grafting at Implant Placement

Background: There is limited information regarding the effect of grafting of the osteotomy after subcrestal implant placement. The primary aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the effect of bone grafting of the defect between the bone crest and the coronal aspect of implants with reduced abutment diameter placed non‐submerged and at subcrestal positions. Methods: Records of 50 consecutive patients treated with subcrestally placed dental implants grafted with a xenograft (Group A) and 50 consecutive patients with subcrestally placed dental implants without any grafting material (Group B) were reviewed. For each implant, the radiographs after placement were compared to images from the last follow‐up visit and evaluated regarding the following: 1) degree of subcrestal positioning of the implant, 2) changes of marginal hard‐tissue height over time, and 3) whether marginal hard‐tissue could be detected on the implant platform at the follow‐up visit. Results: The mean marginal loss of hard tissues was 0.11 ± 0.30 mm for Group A and 0.08 ± 0.22 mm for Group B. Sixty‐nine percent of the implants in Group A and 77% of the implants in Group B demonstrated hard tissue on the implant platform. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding marginal peri‐implant hard‐tissue loss. Conclusion: The present study fails to demonstrate that grafting of the remaining osseous wound defect between the bone crest and the coronal aspect of the implant has a positive effect on marginal peri‐implant hard‐tissue changes.     

The effect of a machined collar on coronal hard tissue around titanium implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to radiographically evaluate the effect of a machined titanium coronal collar on the marginal bone around 1-part endosseous dental implants placed at different heights relative to the bone crest. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty dental implants were placed in edentulous spaces bilaterally in 5 foxhounds. Thirty test implants had a sandblasted, large-grit, dual acid-etched surface (SLA) over the entire length of the implant. The other 30 implants (control) had a machined collar around the most coronal 1.8 mm of the implant; an SLA surface covered the remainder of the implant. Both control and test implants were placed at 3 distinct levels relative to the bone crest. Six implants (3 control and 3 test) were randomly placed side by side in each hemimandible. Radiographs were taken at placement (baseline) and monthly for 6 months postplacement using a standardized radiographic template. RESULTS: Fifty-eight of the implants integrated and were analyzed on each proximal surface. Bone loss occurred around all implants over the 6 months of the study. In general, implants placed with the top of the SLA surface above the bone crest had significantly less bone loss than implants with the top of the SLA surface placed flush with the bone level. Apically placed implants had greater bone loss than coronally placed implants. The magnitude of bone loss around paired control and test implants was approximately the same. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The least bone loss with each implant type was observed when the top of the implant was placed above the alveolar crest. When there was no machined collar, the least distance from the implant top to the bone crest (not, however, the least bone loss) was observed when the top of the implant was level with the bone crest.     

Bone level alterations at implants placed in the posterior segments of the dentition: outcome of submerged/non-submerged healing. A 5-year multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial

Objective: To determine if longitudinal bone level change at Astra Tech^? implants placed in the posterior part of the dentition was influenced by the healing conditions provided following implant placement, i.e., submerged or non‐submerged healing. Material and methods: Eighty‐four patients and 115 fixed partial dentures (FPDs or cases) entered the study. The cases were randomized into two implant installation groups: initially non‐submerged (group A) or initially submerged (group B) implants. Three hundred and twenty‐four implants were installed (group A=153; group B=171): 145 in the maxilla and 179 in the mandible. Radiographs from the implant sites were obtained at FPD insertion (baseline) and subsequently every 12 months. In the radiographs, the position of the marginal bone at the mesial and distal aspects of the implants was determined and the radiographic (Rx) bone level change over time was calculated. Results: Seven implants failed to integrate (four in group A and three in group B). During the 5 years of monitoring, three implants had to be removed and 35 implants were lost to follow‐up. The Rx bone level alteration that occurred during year 1 was 0.02±0.38 mm in group A and 0.17±0.51 mm in group B. During the subsequent 4 years there was some further Rx bone loss in group B (0.02±0.62 mm), while in group A there was some gain of bone (0.07±0.5 mm). Conclusion: The peri‐implant bone level change and number of biological complications that took place during the 5 years was small and unrelated to the surgical protocol used for implant placement.     

Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: five‐year follow‐up

The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiological parameters of standard SLA surface implants compared to chemically modified hydrophilic SLActive implants in irradiated patients after the initial 12‐month loading period up to 5 years. Twenty patients with a mean age of 61·1 years were treated with dental implants after ablative surgery and radio‐chemotherapy of oral cancer. All patients were non‐smokers. The placement of 102 implants (50 SLA, 52 SLActive) was performed bilaterally according to a split‐mouth design. Mean crestal bone changes were evaluated using standardised orthopantomographies and clinical parameters. Data were analysed using a Kaplan–Meier curve, Mann–Whitney U‐test and two‐factorial non‐parametric analysis. The average observation period was 60 months. The amount of bone loss at the implant shoulder of SLA implants was mesial and distal 0·7 mm. The SLActive implants displayed a bone loss of mesial 0·6 mm as well as distal 0·7 mm after 5 years. Two SLA implants were lost before loading. One patient lost five implants due to recurrence of a tumour. The overall cumulative 12‐month, 3‐year and 5‐year survival rate of SLA implants was 92%, 80% and 75·8% and of SLActive implants 94·2%, 78·8% and 74·4%, respectively. Eighteen implants were considered lost because the patients had died. Sandblasted acid‐etched implants with or without a chemically modified surface can be used in irradiated patients with a high predictability of success. Lower implant survival rates in patients with irradiated oral cancer may be associated with systemic effects rather than peri‐implantitis.     

Effect of platform switching on peri-implant bone levels: a randomized clinical trial

Objective: The concept of platform switching has been introduced to implant dentistry based on observations of reduced peri‐implant bone loss. However, randomized clinical trials are still lacking. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that platform switching has a positive impact on crestal bone‐level changes. Material and methods: Two implants with diameters of 4 mm were inserted epicrestally into one side of the posterior mandibles of 25 subjects. After 3 months of submerged healing, the reentry surgery was performed. On the randomly placed test implant, an abutment 3.3 mm in diameter was mounted, resulting in a horizontal circular step of 0.35 mm (platform switching). The control implant was straight, with an abutment 4 mm in diameter. Single‐tooth crowns were cemented provisionally. All patients were monitored at short intervals over the course of 1 year. Standardized radiographs and microbiological samples from the implants' inner spaces were obtained at baseline (implant surgery), and after 3, 4, and 12 months. Results: After 1 year, the mean radiographic vertical bone loss at the test implants was 0.53±0.35 mm and at the control implants, it was 0.58±0.55 mm. The mean intraindividual difference was 0.05±0.56 mm, which is significantly <0.35 mm (P=0.0093, post hoc power 79.9%). The crestal bone‐level changes depended on time (P<0.001), but not on platform switching (P=0.4). The implants' internal spaces were contaminated by bacteria, with no significant differences in the total counts between the test and the control at any time point (P=0.98). Conclusions: The present randomized clinical trial could not confirm the hypothesis of a reduced peri‐implant bone loss at implants restored according to the concept of platform switching. To cite this article:
Enkling N, Jöhren P, Klimberg V, Bayer S, Mericske‐Stern R, Jepsen S. Effect of platform switching on peri‐implant bone levels: a randomized clinical trial.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 1185–1192.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02090.x     

Tissue integration of a new titanium-zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine

Background: This study evaluates a newly developed titanium–zirconium implant (TiZr), comparing it to a commercially available pure titanium (Ti) implant subjected to the same surface treatment. Methods: In nine dogs, 12 implants (six TiZr and six Ti) were randomly placed in the mandible with the implant shoulder at the bone crest and subjected to submerged healing. Standardized radiographs were taken after implantation, and at the sacrifice of 2 weeks (three dogs), 4 weeks (three dogs), and 8 weeks (three dogs). Histologic and histomorphometric measurements were performed on non‐decalcified histologic sections. The main outcome measures included the first bone–implant contact (fBIC) and BIC over time. For statistical analysis, Wilcoxon signed‐rank test and mixed model regressions were applied. Results: From baseline to 8 weeks, a mean bone loss of 0.09 ± 0.33 mm for TiZr and a gain of 0.02 ± 0.33 mm for Ti were calculated radiographically. The number of implants with the fBIC coronal to the reference point (implant shoulder) gradually increased over time, reaching 39% of all TiZr implants and 50% of all Ti implants at 8 weeks. The mean fBIC values for Ti and TiZr were 0.29 ± 0.42 mm and 0.26 ± 0.32 mm (2 weeks), ?0.01 ± 0.20 mm and 0.10 ± 0.28 mm (4 weeks), and ?0.06 ± 0.22 mm and 0.08 ± 0.30 mm (8 weeks), respectively. The mean BIC values peaked at 86.9% ± 6.8% (8 weeks) for TiZr and at 83.4% ± 5.9% (4 weeks) for Ti. No statistically significant differences were observed at any time point. Conclusion: TiZr and Ti bone level implants with chemically‐modified, sandblasted, and acid‐etched surfaces performed similarly in regards to osseointegration in this unloaded canine study.     

Radiological and clinical follow-up of machined- and anodized-surface implants after mean functional loading for 33 months

Abstract: The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare peri‐implant bone loss and mucosal conditions around machined‐surface (MS) and anodized‐surface (AS) interforaminal implants in the mandible at least 30 months after placement. Fifty patients, each treated with four interforaminal screw‐type implants consecutively, were included. Thirty‐one patients (62%) with a total number of 124 implants (64 MS and 60 AS implants, both Brånemark type MKIII) were available for follow‐up. Rotational panoramic radiographs were used for evaluating marginal bone loss. Clinically, marginal plaque index (mPI), bleeding on probing (BOP) and pocket probing depth (PPD) were evaluated. AS implants showed significantly less marginal bone loss than MS implants (−1.17±0.13 vs. −1.42±0.13 mm; P=0.03). Marginal bone loss around distal implants was less pronounced at AS implants (−1.05±0.14 mm) when compared with MS implants (−1.46±0.14 mm; P=0.05). Within the smoking group, there was less peri‐implant bone loss around AS implants than around MS implants (−1.08±0.27 vs. −1.83±0.2; P=0.04). No differences between MS and AS implants were found with respect to mPI (57% vs. 67%), BOP (21% vs. 17%) and mean PPD (2.59±0.29 vs. 2.56±0.28 mm). Overall, both types of implants, in combination with bar‐supported overdentures, can produce excellent long‐term results in the interforaminal edentulous mandible with less peri‐implant bone loss around rough implant surfaces, which had beneficial effects at distal implants and in smokers.     

Influence of placement depth on bone remodeling around tapered internal connection implant: a clinical and radiographic study in dogs

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of placement depth on bone remodeling around implants with two different types of tapered internal implant–abutment interface (IAI): tapped‐in (TI) tapered internal IAI and screwed‐in (SI) tapered internal IAI in dogs. Methods: The second, third, and fourth premolars and the first molar in mandibles of six beagle dogs were extracted. After 8 weeks, two SI implants and two TI implants were placed in one side of the mandible. There were four experimental groups: 1) SI placed crestally (SIC); 2) TI placed crestally (TIC); 3) SI placed 1.5 mm subcrestally (SIS); and 4) TI placed 1.5 mm subcrestally (TIS). Healing abutments were connected 12 weeks after implant surgery. Implants and teeth were brushed every second day during the healing period. Clinical and radiographic parameters were recorded at 4, 10, and 16 weeks after second‐stage surgery. Results: Differences between SI and TI implants inserted in the same vertical position were not significant for peri‐implant probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), or bone resorption (P >0.05). Subcrestal placement of both implants had greater PD and CAL compared to crestal groups. However, distance from IAI to the first bone–implant contact was lower in subcrestal groups compared to crestal groups (1.27 ± 0.42 mm for SIC versus 0.46 ± 0.26 mm for SIS, P <0.05; 1.36 ± 0.31 mm for TIC versus 0.78 ± 0.42 mm for TIS, P <0.05). Conclusions: Tapered internal IAI configuration had no significant effect on crestal bone resorption. Moreover, subcrestal placement of tapered internal IAI had a positive impact on crestal bone preservation around the cervix of the implant.     

Equicrestal and subcrestal dental implants: a histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of nine retrieved human implants

Background: Stability of peri‐implant crestal bone plays a relevant role relative to the presence or absence of interdental papilla. Several factors can contribute to the crestal bone resorption observed around two‐piece implants, such as the presence of a microgap at the level of the implant–abutment junction, the type of connection between implant and prosthetic components, the implant positioning relative to the alveolar crest, and the interimplant distance. Subcrestal positioning of dental implants has been proposed to decrease the risk of exposure of the metal of the top of the implant or of the abutment margin, and to get enough space in a vertical dimension to create a harmoniously esthetic emergence profile. Methods: The present retrospective histologic study was performed to evaluate dental implants retrieved from human jaws that had been inserted in an equicrestal or subcrestal position. A total of nine implants were evaluated: five of these had been inserted in an equicrestal position, whereas the other four had been positioned subcrestally (1 to 3 mm). Results: In all subcrestally placed implants, preexisting and newly formed bone was found over the implant shoulder. In the equicrestal implants, crestal bone resorption (0.5 to 1.5 mm) was present around all implants. Conclusion: The subcrestal position of the implants resulted in bone located above the implant shoulder.     

Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at non-submerged and submerged chemically modified (SLActive) and conventional SLA titanium implants: an immunohistochemical study in dogs

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to evaluate bone regeneration in dehiscence‐type defects at non‐submerged and submerged titanium implants with chemically modified (mod) and conventional sandblasted/acid‐etched (SLA) surfaces. Material and Methods: Standardized buccal dehiscence defects were surgically created following implant site preparation in both the upper and lower jaws of 12 beagle dogs. Both types of implants were randomly assigned to either a non‐submerged or a submerged healing procedure. After 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks, dissected blocks were processed for histomorphometrical [e.g. new bone height (NBH), per cent linear fill (PLF), percentage of bone to implant contact (BIC‐D), area of new bone fill (BF)] and immunohistochemical analysis. Results: At 8 weeks, non‐submerged and submerged SLA implants revealed significantly lower mean NBH (1.1±0.8–1.9±1.2 mm), PLF (27.7±20.3–46.0±28.5%), BIC‐D (26.8±10.4–46.2±16.2%), and BF (1.3±0.9–3.4±2.8 mm²) values than respective modSLA implants [NBH (2.6±0.8–4.3±0.1 mm), PLF (64.2±19.4–107.2±4.7%), BIC‐D (67.5±18.8–82.1±14.8%), BF (2.9±1.0–6.7±1.1 mm²)]. Within modSLA groups, significantly highest BF values were observed at submerged implants. Conclusion: It was concluded that (i) modSLA titanium surfaces promoted bone regeneration in acute‐type buccal dehiscence defects and (ii) a submerged healing procedure improved the outcome of healing additionally.     

Transmucosal healing around peri‐implant defects: crestal and subcrestal implant placement in dogs

Objective: This study was designed to evaluate the transmucosal healing response of implants placed with the junction of the smooth surfaces, either crestal or subcrestal, into simulated extraction defects after healing periods of 1 and 3 months. Materials and methods: A total of 23 Straumann SP ?3.3 mm NN, SLA^® 10 mm implants were placed in the mandibular premolar regions of three greyhound dogs 3 months after the teeth were removed. Five control implants were placed at the crestal bone level, and test implants with surgically created peri‐implant defects of 1.25 mm wide × 5 mm depth were placed either at the crestal (nine implants) or at the 2 mm subcrestal (nine implants) bone level. Implants on the right side were placed 1 month before the dogs were sacrificed, and implants on the left side were placed 3 months before sacrifice. All dogs had daily plaque control following surgery and were sacrificed 3 months after implant placement for histological and histometric analyses. Results: Mesial–distal ground sections of the control and test implant specimens showed a greater %BIC in the coronal defect region after 3 months of healing. This healing response was incomplete for the test implants compared with the control implants after a 1‐month healing period. The histometric measurements for test implants placed at the crestal bone level or 2 mm subcrestal with surgically created peri‐implant defects were more coronal or closer to the implant margin compared with the control implants. Additionally, the degree of osseointegration between the newly formed bone and the implant surface was similar between the test implants. Conclusion: Peri‐implant defects of 1.25 mm width healed with spontaneous bone regeneration around implants placed transmucosally at crestal or 2 mm subcrestal with a high degree of osseointegration after a 3‐month healing period. To cite this article:
Tran BLT, Chen ST, Caiafa A, Davies HMS, Darby IB. Transmucosal healing around peri‐implant defects: crestal and subcrestal implant placement in dogs.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21 , 2010; 794–803.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.01911.x     

10‐Year Survival and Success Rates of 511 Titanium Implants with a Sandblasted and Acid‐Etched Surface: A Retrospective Study in 303 Partially Edentulous Patients

Purpose: This retrospective study assessed the 10‐year outcomes of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid‐etched (SLA) surface in a large cohort of partially edentulous patients. Materials and Methods: Records of patients treated with SLA implants between May 1997 and January 2001 were screened. Eligible patients were contacted and invited to undergo a clinical and radiologic examination. Each implant was classified according to strict success criteria. Results: Three hundred three patients with 511 SLA implants were available for the examination. The mean age of the patients at implant surgery was 48 years. Over the 10‐year period, no implant fracture was noted, whereas six implants (1.2%) were lost. Two implants (0.4%) showed signs of suppuration at the 10‐year examination, whereas seven implants had a history of peri‐implantitis (1.4%) during the 10‐year period, but presented with healthy peri‐implant soft tissues at examination. The remaining 496 implants fulfilled the success criteria. The mean Plaque Index was 0.65 (±0.64), the mean Sulcus Bleeding Index 1.32 (±0.57), the mean Probing Depth 3.27 mm (±1.06), and the mean distance from the implant shoulder to the mucosal margin value ?0.42 mm (±1.27). The radiologic mean distance from the implant shoulder to the first bone‐to‐implant contact was 3.32 mm (±0.73). Conclusion: The present retrospective analysis resulted in a 10‐year implant survival rate of 98.8% and a success rate of 97.0%. In addition, the prevalence of peri‐implantitis in this large cohort of orally healthy patients was low with 1.8% during the 10‐year period.