Efavirenz does not meaningfully affect the single dose pharmacokinetics of 1200 mg raltegravir

Raltegravir is a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)‐1 integrase strand transfer inhibitor currently marketed at a dose of 400 mg twice daily (BID). Raltegravir for once daily regimen (QD) at a dose of 1200 mg (2 x 600 mg) is under development and offers a new treatment option for HIV‐1 infected treatment‐naive subjects. Since raltegravir is eliminated mainly by metabolism via an UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1 A1‐mediated glucuronidation pathway, co‐administration of UGT1A1 inducers may alter plasma levels of raltegravir. Efavirenz, an UGT1A1 inducer, was used to assess the impact of altered UGT activity on a 1200 mg QD dose of raltegravir. An open label, randomized, 2‐period fixed‐sequence Phase 1 study was performed in adult healthy male and female subjects (non‐childbearing potential) ≥ 19 and ≤55 years of age, with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 18.5 and ≤32.0 kg/m². Subjects (n = 21) received a single oral dose of 1200 mg raltegravir at bedtime on an empty stomach on Day 1 in Period 1. After a washout period of at least 7 days, subjects received oral doses of 600 mg efavirenz QD at bedtime for 14 consecutive days in Period 2. Subjects received a single oral dose of 1200 mg raltegravir co‐administered with 600 mg efavirenz on Day 12 of Period 2. Pharmacokinetic (PK) samples were collected for 72 hours following raltegravir dosing and analyzed using a validated bioanalytical method to quantify raltegravir plasma concentrations. PK parameters were estimated using non‐compartmental analysis. Administration of single 1200 mg oral doses of raltegravir alone and co‐administered with multiple oral doses of efavirenz were generally well tolerated in healthy subjects. Co‐administration with efavirenz yielded geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and their associated 90% confidence intervals (90% CIs) for raltegravir AUC_0‐∞, C_max, and C₂₄ of 0.86 (0.73, 1.01), 0.91 (0.70, 1.17), and 0.94 (0.76, 1.17), respectively. The results show that efavirenz modestly reduced the exposure of raltegravir. The reduction in raltegravir exposure is not considered clinically meaningful. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Atazanavir increases the plasma concentrations of 1200 mg raltegravir dose

Raltegravir is a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)‐1 integrase strand transfer inhibitor currently marketed at a dose of 400 mg twice‐daily (b.i.d.). Raltegravir 1200 mg once‐daily (q.d.) (investigational q.d. formulation of 2 × 600 mg tablets; q.d. RAL) was found to be generally well tolerated and non‐inferior to the marketed 400 mg b.i.d. dose at 48 weeks in a phase 3 trial. Since raltegravir is eliminated mainly by metabolism via a uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1‐mediated glucuronidation pathway, co‐administration of UGT1A1 inhibitors may increase the plasma levels of q.d. RAL. To assess this potential, the drug interaction of 1200 mg raltegravir using atazanavir, a known UGT1A1 inhibitor, was studied. An open‐label, randomized, 2‐period, fixed‐sequence phase 1 study was performed in adult healthy male and female (non‐childbearing potential) subjects ≥ 19 and ≤ 55 years of age, with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 18.5 and ≤ 32.0 kg/m². Subjects (n = 14) received a single oral dose of 1200 mg raltegravir in period 1. After a washout period of at least 7 days, the subjects received oral doses of 400 mg atazanavir q.d. for 9 consecutive days, with a single oral dose of 1200 mg raltegravir co‐administered on day 7 of period 2. Serial blood samples were collected for 72 h following raltegravir dosing and analysed using a validated bioanalytical method to quantify raltegravir plasma concentrations. Co‐administration with atazanavir yielded GMRs (90% CIs) for raltegravir AUC_0‐∞, C_max and C₂₄ of 1.67 (1.34, 2.10), 1.16 (1.01, 1.33) and 1.26 (1.08, 1.46), respectively. There was no effect of raltegravir on serum total bilirubin. In contrast, atazanavir increased the mean bilirubin by up to 200%, an effect that was preserved in the atazanavir/raltegravir treatment group. Administration of single q.d. RAL alone and co‐administered with multiple oral doses of atazanavir were generally well tolerated in healthy subjects. The results show that atazanavir increased the PK exposure of raltegravir; therefore, co‐administration of atazanavir with raltegravir q.d. is not recommended. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Metabolism and disposition in humans of raltegravir (MK-0518), an anti-AIDS drug targeting the human immunodeficiency virus 1 integrase enzyme.

Raltegravir is a potent human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) integrase strand transfer inhibitor that is being developed as a novel anti-AIDS drug. The absorption, metabolism, and excretion of raltegravir were studied in healthy volunteers after a single oral dose of 200 mg (200 microCi) of [(14)C]raltegravir. Plasma, urine, and fecal samples were collected at specified intervals up to 240 h postdose, and the samples were analyzed for total radioactivity, parent compound, and metabolites. Radioactivity was eliminated in substantial amounts in both urine (32%) and feces (51%). The elimination of radioactivity was rapid, since the majority of the recovered dose was attributable to samples collected through 24 h. In extracts of urine, two components were detected and were identified as raltegravir and the glucuronide of raltegravir (M2), and each accounted for 9% and 23% of the dose recovered in urine, respectively. Only a single radioactive peak, which was identified as raltegravir, was detected in fecal extracts; raltegravir in feces is believed to be derived, at least in part, from the hydrolysis of M2 secreted in bile, as demonstrated in rats. The major entity in plasma was raltegravir, which represented 70% of the total radioactivity, with the remaining radioactivity accounted for by M2. Studies using cDNA-expressed UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs), form-selective chemical inhibitors, and correlation analysis indicated that UGT1A1 was the main UGT isoform responsible for the formation of M2. Collectively, the data indicate that the major mechanism of clearance of raltegravir in humans is UGT1A1-mediated glucuronidation.     

Metabolic drug interactions with newer antipsychotics: a comparative review

Newer antipsychotics introduced in clinical practice in recent years include clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, sertindole, ziprasidone, aripiprazole and amisulpride. These agents are subject to drug-drug interactions with other psychotropic agents or with medications used in the treatment of concomitant physical illnesses. Most pharmacokinetic interactions with newer antipsychotics occur at the metabolic level and usually involve changes in the activity of the major drug-metabolizing enzymes involved in their biotransformation, i.e. the cytochrome P450 (CYP) monooxygenases and/or uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT). Clozapine is metabolized primarily by CYP1A2, with additional contribution by other CYP isoforms. Risperidone is metabolized primarily by CYP2D6 and, to a lesser extent, CYP3A4. Olanzapine undergoes both direct conjugation and CYP1A2-mediated oxidation. Quetiapine is metabolized by CYP3A4, while sertindole and aripiprazole are metabolized by CYP2D6 and CYP3A4. Ziprasidone pathways include aldehyde oxidase-mediated reduction and CYP3A4-mediated oxidation. Amisulpride is primarily excreted in the urine and undergoes relatively little metabolism. While novel antipsychotics are unlikely to interfere with the elimination of other drugs, co-administration of inhibitors or inducers of the major enzymes responsible for their metabolism may modify their plasma concentrations, leading to potentially significant effects. Most documented metabolic interactions involve antidepressant and anti-epileptic drugs. Of a particular clinical significance is the interaction between fluvoxamine, a potent CYP1A2 inhibitor, and clozapine. Differences in the interaction potential among the novel antipsychotics currently available may be predicted based on their metabolic pathways. The clinical relevance of these interactions should be interpreted in relation to the relative width of their therapeutic index. Avoidance of unnecessary polypharmacy, knowledge of the interaction profiles of individual agents, and careful individualization of dosage based on close evaluation of clinical response and, possibly, plasma drug concentrations are essential to prevent and minimize potentially adverse drug interactions in patients receiving newer antipsychotics.     

Lack of a pharmacokinetic effect of raltegravir on midazolam: in vitro/in vivo correlation

Raltegravir is a novel HIV-1 integrase inhibitor with potent in vitro activity (95% inhibitory concentration = 33 nM in 50% human serum). In vitro characterization of raltegravir inhibition potential was assessed against a panel of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. An open-label, 2-period study was conducted to assess the effect of raltegravir on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam, a sensitive CYP 3A4 probe substrate: period 1, 2.0 mg of midazolam; period 2, 400 mg of raltegravir every 12 hours for 14 days with 2.0 mg of midazolam on day 14. There was no meaningful in vitro effect of raltegravir on inhibition of a panel of CYP enzymes and induction of CYP 3A4. In the presence of raltegravir, midazolam area under the curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) geometric mean ratios were similar (geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals: 0.92 [0.82, 1.03] (P = .208) and 1.03 [0.87, 1.22] (P = .751), respectively). No substantial differences were observed in T(max) (P = .750) or apparent half-life (P = .533) of midazolam. Plasma levels of midazolam were not substantially affected by raltegravir, which implies that raltegravir is not a clinically important inducer or inhibitor of CYP 3A4 and that raltegravir would not be expected to affect the pharmacokinetics of other drugs metabolized by CYP 3A4 to a clinically meaningful extent.     

Clinically important drug interactions potentially involving mechanism-based inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4 and the role of therapeutic drug monitoring

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 is the most abundant enzyme of CYPs in the liver and gut that metabolizes approximately 50% currently available drugs. A number of important drugs have been identified as substrates, inducers, and/or inhibitors of CYP3A4. The substrates of CYP3A4 considerably overlap with those of P-glycoprotein. Both CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein are subject to inhibition and induction by a number of factors. Mechanism-based inhibition of CYP3A4 is characterized by NADPH-, time-, and concentration-dependent enzyme inactivation occurring when some xenobiotics or drugs are converted by CYPs to reactive metabolites. Such an inhibition of CYP3A4 is caused by chemical modification of the heme, the protein, or both as a result of covalent binding of modified heme to the protein. To date, the identified clinically important mechanism-based CYP3A4 inhibitors mainly include macrolide antibiotics (eg, clarithromycin and erythromycin), anti-HIV agents (eg, ritonavir and delavirdine), antidepressants (eg, fluoxetine and fluvoxamine), calcium channel blockers (eg, verapamil and diltiazem), steroids and their modulators (eg, gestodene and mifepristone), and several herbal and dietary components. The inactivation of CYP3A4 by drugs often causes unfavorable and long-lasting drug-drug interactions and probably fatal toxicity, depending on many factors associated with the enzyme, drugs, and the patients. Clinicians are encouraged to have a sound knowledge of drug-induced, mechanism-based CYP3A4 inhibition; take proper cautions, and perform close monitoring for possible drug interactions when using drugs that are mechanism-based CYP3A4 inhibitors. To minimize drug-drug interactions involving mechanism-based CYP3A4 inhibition, it is necessary to choose safe drug combination regimens, adjust drug dosages appropriately, and conduct therapeutic drug monitoring for drugs with narrow therapeutic indices.     

Identification of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases involved in the human hepatic metabolism of GV150526, a novel glycine antagonist

The major metabolic pathway for elimination of GV150526 is by glucuronidation exerted by glucuronosyl transferases (UGTs). Potential exists for the modification of GV150526 pharmacokinetics by drugs capable of inhibiting the glucuronidation of GV150526. Using human liver microsomes, 44 compounds were screened for inhibition of GV150526 glucuronidation. These compounds were selected because they are extensively glucuronidated themselves or are used as concomitant medication in the treatment of acute stroke. For 11 compounds out of the 44, full inhibition kinetics were performed to determine their Ki-value and mechanism of inhibition. To predict possible in vivo drug-drug interactions, the theoretical percentage of inhibition (i) was determined, based on in vitro determined Ki-values, and the expected Cmax plasma levels of GV150526 and the inhibitor. Of the 11 compounds examined, only propofol had an i-value of 6.6; for all other compounds i-values were lower than 2.1. These results indicate that although in vitro inhibition is observed, the likelihood of in vivo drug-drug metabolic interactions occurring is low. The inhibition results suggest that in addition to UGT1A1, also UGT1A3, UGT1A8/9, and UGT2B4 are involved in the glucuronidation of GV150526. The involvement of UGT1A1 and UGT1A8/9 was confirmed from studies using cDNA expressed human UGT cell lines.     

Raltegravir thorough QT/QTc study: a single supratherapeutic dose of raltegravir does not prolong the QTcF interval

Raltegravir is a novel HIV-1 integrase inhibitor with potent in vitro activity (IC(95) = 31 nM in 50% human serum). A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-dummy, 3-period, single-dose crossover study was conducted; subjects received single oral doses of 1600 mg raltegravir, 400 mg moxifloxacin, and placebo. The upper limit of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval for the QTcF interval placebo-adjusted mean change from baseline of raltegravir was less than 10 ms at every time point. For the raltegravir and placebo groups, there were no QTcF values >450 ms or change from baseline values >30 ms. A mean C(max) of approximately 20 muM raltegravir was attained, approximately 4-fold higher than the C(max) at the clinical dose. Moxifloxacin demonstrated an increase in QTcF at the 2-, 3-, and 4-hour time points. Administration of a single supratherapeutic dose of raltegravir does not prolong the QTcF interval. A single supratherapeutic dose design may be appropriate for crossover thorough QTc studies.     

Drug interactions of clinical importance with antihyperglycaemic agents: an update.

Because management of type 2 diabetes mellitus usually involves combined pharmacological therapy to obtain adequate glucose control and treatment of concurrent pathologies (especially dyslipidaemia and arterial hypertension), drug-drug interactions must be carefully considered with antihyperglycaemic drugs. Additive glucose-lowering effects have been extensively reported when combining sulphonylureas (or the new insulin secretagogues, meglitinide derivatives, i.e. nateglinide and repaglinide) with metformin, sulphonylureas (or meglitinide derivatives) with thiazolidinediones (also called glitazones) and the biguanide compound metformin with thiazolidinediones. Interest in combining alpha-glucosidase inhibitors with either sulphonylureas (or meglitinide derivatives), metformin or thiazolidinediones has also been demonstrated. These combinations result in lower glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), fasting glucose and postprandial glucose levels than with either monotherapy. Even if modest pharmacokinetic interferences have been reported with some combinations, they do not appear to have important clinical consequences. No significant adverse effects, except a higher risk of hypoglycaemic episodes that may be attributed to better glycaemic control, occur with any combination. Challenging the classical dual therapy with sulphonylurea plus metformin, there is a recent trend to use alternative dual combinations (sulphonylurea plus thiazolidinedione or metformin plus thiazolidinedione). In addition, triple therapy with the addition of a thiazolidinedione to the metformin-sulphonylurea combination has been recently evaluated and allows glucose targets to be reached before insulin therapy is considered. This triple therapy appears to be safe, with no deleterious drug-drug interactions being reported so far.Potential interferences may also occur between glucose-lowering agents and other drugs, and such drug-drug interactions may have important clinical implications. Relevant pharmacological agents are those that are widely coadministered in diabetic patients (e.g. lipid-lowering agents, antihypertensive agents); those that have a narrow efficacy/toxicity ratio (e.g. digoxin, warfarin); or those that are known to induce (rifampicin [rifampin]) or inhibit (fluconazole) the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system. Metformin is currently a key compound in the pharmacological management of type 2 diabetes, used either alone or in combination with other antihyperglycaemics. There are no clinically relevant metabolic interactions with metformin, because this compound is not metabolised and does not inhibit the metabolism of other drugs. In contrast, sulphonylureas, meglitinide derivatives and thiazolidinediones are extensively metabolised in the liver via the CYP system and thus, may be subject to drug-drug metabolic interactions. Many HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are also metabolised via the CYP system. Even if modest pharmacokinetic interactions may occur, it is not clear whether drug-drug interactions between oral antihyperglycaemic agents and statins may have clinical consequences regarding both efficacy and safety. In contrast, a marked pharmacokinetic interference has been reported between gemfibrozil and repaglinide and, to a lesser extent, between gemfibrozil and rosiglitazone. This leads to a drastic increase in plasma concentrations of each antihyperglycaemic agent when they are coadministered with the fibric acid derivative, and an increased risk of adverse effects.Some antihypertensive agents may favour hypoglycaemic episodes when co-prescribed with sulphonylureas or meglitinide derivatives, especially ACE inhibitors, but this effect seems to result from a pharmacodynamic drug-drug interaction rather than from a pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction. No, or only modest, interferences have been described with glucose-lowering agents and other pharmacological compounds such as digoxin or warfarin. The effects of inducers or inhibitors of CYP isoenzymes on the metabolism and pharmacokinetics of the glucose-lowering agents of each pharmacological class has been tested. Significantly increased (with CYP inhibitors) or decreased (with CYP inducers) plasma levels of sulphonylureas, meglitinide derivatives and thiazolidinediones have been reported in healthy volunteers, and these pharmacokinetic changes may lead to enhanced or reduced glucose-lowering action, and thus hypoglycaemia or worsening of metabolic control, respectively. In addition, some case reports have evidenced potential drug-drug interactions with various antihyperglycaemic agents that are usually associated with a higher risk of hypoglycaemia.     

In vitro drug-drug interaction studies with febuxostat, a novel non-purine selective inhibitor of xanthine oxidase: plasma protein binding, identification of metabolic enzymes and cytochrome P450 inhibition

1. The potential for drug-drug interactions with febuxostat was examined in the following three in vitro systems: the characteristics of the binding of febuxostat to human plasma proteins; identification of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzymes participating in the metabolism of febuxostat; and the potential inhibitory effects of febuxostat on typical CYP reactions. 2. The results have shown that the presence of ibuprofen or warfarin did not change the plasma protein binding of febuxostat, and that febuxostat did not influence the plasma protein binding of ibuprofen or warfarin. These results indicate that there is little possibility that febuxostat causes a drug-drug interaction by binding to albumin. 3. The UGT 1 and 2 families were involved in the glucuronidation, and several CYPs participated in the metabolism of febuxostat, suggesting that there is little possibility that the blood concentration of febuxostat varies widely even if febuxostat is concomitantly administered with drugs that inhibit CYP or UGT enzyme. Examination of the inhibitory effect of febuxostat on CYP enzymes suggests that febuxostat minimally inhibits the activities of any CYP. 4. The results demonstrate that febuxostat is a novel anti-hyperuricaemia drug with low drug-drug interaction potential in clinical use.     

Drug-drug interactions for UDP-glucuronosyltransferase substrates: a pharmacokinetic explanation for typically observed low exposure (AUCi/AUC) ratios.

Glucuronidation is a listed clearance mechanism for 1 in 10 of the top 200 prescribed drugs. The objective of this article is to encourage those studying ligand interactions with UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) to adequately consider the potential consequences of in vitro UGT inhibition in humans. Spurred on by interest in developing potent and selective inhibitors for improved confidence around UGT reaction phenotyping, and the increased availability of recombinant forms of human UGTs, several recent studies have reported in vitro inhibition of UGT enzymes. In some cases, the observed potency of UGT inhibitors in vitro has been interpreted as having potential relevance in humans via pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. Although there are reported examples of clinically relevant drug-drug interactions for UGT substrates, exposure increases of the aglycone are rarely greater than 100% in the presence of an inhibitor relative to its absence (i.e., AUCi/AUC < or = 2). This small magnitude in change is in contrast to drugs primarily cleared by cytochrome P450 enzymes, where exposures have been reported to increase as much as 35-fold on coadministration with an inhibitor (e.g., ketoconazole inhibition of CYP3A4-catalyzed terfenadine metabolism). In this article the evidence for purported clinical relevance of potent in vitro inhibition of UGT enzymes will be assessed, taking the following into account: in vitro data on the enzymology of glucuronide formation from aglycone, pharmacokinetic principles based on empirical data for inhibition of metabolism, and clinical data on the pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions of drugs primarily cleared by glucuronidation.     

A conventional LC-MS method developed for the determination of plasma raltegravir concentrations

Raltegravir belongs to a new class of antiretrovirals acting for a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 integrase inhibition. Clinical trials of this drug have demonstrated potent antiviral activity in both therapy na?ve and experienced patients. Thus, raltegravir has become an important component of combination treatment regimens used to treat patients with multidrug-resistant HIV-1. The quantification of raltegravir in human plasma is important to support clinical studies and determine pharmacokinetic parameters of raltegravir in HIV-1 infected patients. Recently, the LC-MS/MS superfine system was developed to determine plasma concentration of raltegravir; however, the system needs to be delicately set and the equipment is very expensive. Therefore, we developed a conventional LC-MS method to overcome these difficulties. Subsequently the method was validated by estimating the precision and accuracy for inter- and intraday analysis in the concentration range of 0.010-7.680 microg/ml. The calibration curve was linear in this range. Average accuracy ranged from 97.2 to 103.4%. Relative standard deviations of both inter- and intraday assays were less than 10.4%. Recovery of raltegravir was more than 80.6%. This novel LC-MS method is accurate and precise enough to determine raltegravir levels in human plasma samples.     

Therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole

Voriconazole is a triazole antifungal developed for the treatment of life-threatening fungal infections in immunocompromised patients. The drug, which is available for both oral and intravenous administration, has broad-spectrum activity against pathogenic yeasts, dimorphic fungi, and opportunistic molds. Voriconazole has a nonlinear pharmacokinetic profile with a wide inter- and intraindividual variety. This variability is caused by many factors such as gender, age, genotypic variation, liver dysfunction, the presence of food, and so on. Another important factor influencing voriconazole's pharmacokinetic profile is drug-drug interactions with CYP450 inhibitors as well as inducers. Variability in plasma concentrations, as a result of the previously mentioned aspects, may lead to variability in efficacy or toxicity. Determination of plasma concentrations is indicated in situations to guide dosing and to individualize and improve the treatment options resulting in better therapeutic outcome or fewer side effects. In this article, we review factors influencing voriconazole pharmacokinetic profile, the data supporting exposure-effect and exposure-toxicity relationships, review the gaps in current knowledge, which make broad recommendations for therapeutic drug monitoring difficult for voriconazole, provide the indications in which therapeutic drug monitoring is reasonable based on currently available data (eg, children), and outline the ways in which this problem could be solved. We provide a summary of the problem so that further research can be conducted to address this are of clinical need.     

Development of an assay using 4-trifluoromethylumbelliferyl as a marker substrate for assessment of drug-drug interactions to multiple isoforms of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases

Glucuronidation is catalyzed by UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) and is one of the most important pathways for elimination of xenobiotics. The aim of the present study was to develop an in vitro assay for assessment of drug-drug interactions related to UGTs applicable to early drug discovery. 4-Trifluoromethylumbelliferyl was tested as a marker substrate for six human recombinant expressed UGT isoforms: 1A1, 1A3, 1A4, 1A6, 1A9, and 2B7. It was shown that 4-trifluoromethylumbelliferyl was glucuronidated by all UGTs tested, except UGT1A4. By using a short HPLC gradient (7 min) and fluorescence detection, the enzyme kinetic parameters for these reactions were obtained. All reactions were found to follow classical Michaelis-Menten kinetics, with K(m) values between 29 microM (UGT1A9) and 80 microM (UGT1A3). The method was validated by using several known competitive inhibitors of UGTs. The most potent inhibition was observed for the reaction between 17alpha-ethynylestradiol and UGT1A1 (K(i) = 10.5 microM), and the weakest interaction was detected for acetaminophen and UGT1A9 (IC(50) > 1 mM). Taken together, we report the development of an assay using 4-trifluoromethylumbelliferyl as a marker substrate for five different human UGT isoforms suitable for the assessment of drug-drug interactions related to UGTs during early drug discovery.     

Pharmacokinetics of mood stabilizers and new anticonvulsants

Mechanisms of action, efficacy spectra, pharmacokinetics, and adverse effects differentiate the mood stabilizers lithium, carbamazepine (CBZ), and valproate (VPA). Lithium, which has a low therapeutic index, is excreted through the kidneys, resulting in renally mediated, but not hepatically mediated, drug-drug interactions. CBZ also has a low therapeutic index and is metabolized primarily by a single isoform (CYP3A3/4). It has an active epoxide metabolite, is susceptible to CYP3A3/4 or epoxide hydrolase inhibitors, and is able to induce drug metabolism (both via cytochrome P450 oxidation and conjugation). CBZ thus has multiple problematic drug-drug interactions. In contrast, VPA has less prominent neurotoxicity and three principal metabolic pathways, and it is less susceptible to pharmacokinetic drug interactions. Still, VPA can increase plasma concentrations of some drugs by inhibiting metabolism and can increase the free fractions of certain medications by displacing them from plasma proteins. The newer anticonvulsants lamotrigine, topiramate, and tiagabine have different, generally less problematic, hepatically mediated drug-drug interactions. Gabapentin, which is renally excreted, lacks hepatic drug-drug interactions, though bioavailability may be reduced at higher doses. Recently approved anticonvulsants, including oxcarbazepine, zonisamide, and levetiracetam, may have improved pharmacokinetic profiles compared to older agents. Novel psychotropic effects of these drugs may also be demonstrated, based on their mechanisms of action and preliminary clinical data.     

HIV-1 integrase inhibitor raltegravir promotes DNA damage-induced apoptosis in multiple myeloma

Raltegravir, the first integrase inhibitor approved for the treatment of HIV infection, has been implicated as a promising potential in cancer treatment. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the repurposing of raltegravir as an anticancer agent and its mechanism of action in multiple myeloma (MM). Human MM cell lines (RPMI-8226, NCI H929, and U266) and normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were cultured with different concentrations of raltegravir for 48 and 72 h. Cell viability and apoptosis were then measured by MTT and Annexin V/PI assays, respectively. Protein levels of cleaved PARP, Bcl-2, Beclin-1, and phosphorylation of histone H2AX were detected by Western blotting. In addition, the mRNA levels of V(D)J recombination and DNA repair genes were analyzed using qPCR. Raltegravir treatment for 72 h significantly decreased cell viability, increased apoptosis, and DNA damage in MM cells while having minimum toxicity on cell viability of normal PBMCs approximately from 200 nM (0.2 μM; p < .01 for U66 and p < .0001 for NCI H929 and RPMI 8226 cells). Furthermore, raltegravir treatment altered the mRNA levels of V(D)J recombination and DNA repair genes. We report for the first time that treatment with raltegravir is associated with decreased cell viability, apoptosis induction, DNA damage accumulation, and alteration of mRNA expression of genes involved in V(D)J recombination and DNA repair in MM cell lines, all of which show its potential for anti-myeloma effects. Hence, raltegravir may significantly impact the treatment of MM, and further studies are required to confirm its efficacy and mechanism of action in more detail in patient-derived myeloma cells and in-vivo models.