Anterior capsule opacification and lens epithelial outgrowth on the intraocular lens surface after curettage

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term difference in lens epithelial cell (LEC) outgrowth on the anterior surface of a hydrogel intraocular lens (IOL) after curettage of the entire or one half of the circumference of the anterior capsule. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Vienna, Austria. METHODS: Forty eyes with senile cataract only were randomly assigned to Group A, which had curettage of the entire anterior capsule, or Group B, which had curettage of the nasal half of the anterior capsule. Rentsch capsule curettes (Geuder) were used, a straight one for the nasal half and a bent model for the temporal half. One surgeon performed all standardized procedures with a temporal clear corneal incision, phacoemulsification, and in-the-bag implantation of a hydrogel IOL. Two years after surgery, the anterior surface of the IOL was examined by specular microscopy in a double-blinded fashion, and LEC outgrowth was graded semiquantitatively. Anterior capsule opacification (ACO) was also graded semiquantitatively. RESULTS: In Group A, grade 2 ACO was observed in 53% of patients and grade 1 ACO in 47%. Similar results were achieved in Group B (59% and 41%, respectively). Two years after IOL implantation, the typically circumferential monolayer outgrowth of LECs on the hydrogel IOL surface was present in 80% in Group A and 60% in Group B. The ongrowth was less dense in the other IOLs; however, no significant differences between the groups were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical removal of residual LECs with a Rentsch capsule curette from the entire or from one half of the anterior capsule did not reduce LEC outgrowth 2 years after IOL implantation. Furthermore, the ACO grade was not significantly different. Lens epithelial cell proliferation in the germinative region and consecutive migration might be the cause of this outgrowth.     

Biocompatibility of hydrophilic intraocular lenses

PURPOSE: To assess the biocompatibility of 3 hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) by evaluating the postoperative cell reaction on the IOL surface, anterior capsule opacification (ACO) rate, and presence of membrane growth over the anterior IOL surface. SETTING: University Eye Clinic of Trieste, Trieste, Italy. METHODS: In this prospective study, 73 patients were randomized to receive 1 of 3 types of hydrogel IOLs after phacoemulsification: Storz Hydroview H60M, Corneal ACR6D, or Ioltech Stabibag. To analyze and photograph the anterior IOL surface, slitlamp biomicroscopy and specular microscopy were performed 7, 30, 90, and 180 days after surgery. Small, epithelioid, and giant inflammatory cell reaction was evaluated. In addition, ACO and membrane growth on the anterior IOL surface were assessed. RESULTS: Low inflammatory cell adhesion was observed on the anterior surface of all 3 IOLs. The Stabibag group had a significantly higher grade of small inflammatory cell reaction 7 and 30 days after surgery. A significantly higher rate of ACO was observed in the ACR6D group. The Hydroview and ACR6D groups had a significantly higher percentage of membrane growth from the capsulorhexis edge onto the anterior IOL surface than the Stabibag group. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically, the 3 hydrophilic IOLs behaved in a different manner, showing the different forms of biocompatibility. Results indicate that a different chemical composition determines correspondingly different protein absorption on IOL surfaces. This might result in a different adhesion pattern and spreading of lens epithelial and inflammatory cells.     

Adhesion mechanisms of human lens epithelial cells on 4 intraocular lens materials

PURPOSE: To evaluate lens epithelial cell (LEC) adhesion on different intraocular lens (IOL) materials with particular attention to the distribution of proteins located in the focal contacts. SETTING: Center of Biotechnological and Clinical Research in Ophthalmology, University of Bologna, Italy. METHODS: The IOL materials tested were poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), heparin-surface-modified PMMA (HSM PMMA), polyHEMA, and silicone. Primary cultures of human LECs were established from human anterior capsules obtained during cataract surgery. The mean number of cells attached per square millimeter was calculated for each material after 24 and 72 hours. Transmission electron microscopy and immunocytochemical analysis were performed to detect the proteins actin, vinculin, and talin. RESULTS: Mean adhesiveness of human LECs increased over time with PMMA and decreased with the other materials. At 72 hours, mean LECs ranged from 54.8 cells/mm2 +/- 12.8 (SD) on PMMA to 2.1 +/- 0.7 cells/mm2 on silicone. The means for HSM PMMA and polyHEMA fell in between. The cytoskeletal proteins were arranged to produce focal contacts in only the LECs cultured on PMMA. The LECs cultured on polyHEMA, HSM PMMA, and silicone attached but failed to develop focal contacts or stress fibers. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the multifactorial pathogenesis of posterior capsule opacification and suggests its incidence will be reduced by improving surgical techniques and using IOL surfaces that discourage cell adhesion.     

Lens epithelial cell reaction after implantation of different intraocular lens materials: two-year results of a randomized prospective trial

PURPOSE: To determine the influence of intraocular lens (IOL) material on anterior capsular opacification and membrane growth over the anterior IOL surface in patients who have undergone standardized small-incision cataract surgery and foldable IOL implantation in the capsular bag. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-eight cataract patients (88 eyes). METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of four different foldable IOLs after phacoemulsification: Storz Hydroview H60M, Corneal ACR6D, AMO SI40NB, and Alcon AcrySof MA60BM. Examinations on days 7, 30, 90, 180, 360, and 720 after surgery included ophthalmologic examination, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and photography using red reflex and focal illumination of the anterior IOL surface. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best-corrected visual acuity was measured at each examination. In addition, the anterior capsule opacification and the membrane growth on the anterior IOL surface were graded according to a subjective method by the same researcher. RESULTS: The fibrosis of the anterior capsule was more frequently observed in the group using Corneal ACR6D and AMO SI40NB. The Hydroview and ACR6D groups showed a higher percentage of cases with membrane growth from the rhexis edge on the anterior IOL surface. AcrySof showed the lowest presence of fibrosis of the anterior capsule, and no membrane growth was noted. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior capsule opacification is an index of IOL biocompatibility. The natural location of lens epithelial cells (LECs) precludes the possibility of the IOL's design influencing the anterior capsule behavior. The local response of LECs varies according to the IOL studied. This may be related to the chemical and physical properties of the materials used in the different IOLs.     

Shape of lens epithelial cells after intraocular lens implantation

PURPOSE: To evaluate the morphological behavior of lens epithelial cells (LECs) after human cataract surgery with implantation of a poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) or silicone intraocular lens (IOL). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Fujita Health University, Banbuntane Hotokukai Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan. METHODS: Morphological observations of LECs in the patients with IOLs were made by light and transmission electron microscopy. The LECs were from 4 areas: (1) the region below the anterior capsule, touching the IOL; (2) the area between region 1 and the equatorial region; (3) the equatorial region; and (4) the central equatorial region and of the posterior capsule not touching the IOL. Case 1 had implantation of a single-piece IOL with a PMMA optic and haptics. Case 2 had a 3-piece IOL with a PMMA optic and polypropylene haptics. Case 3 had a 3-piece IOL with a silicone optic and polypropylene haptics. Areas 1 and 4 could not be observed in Case 2. RESULTS: The major difference between the patient with a PMMA IOL (Case 1) and the patient with a silicone IOL (Case 3) was that among the 4 areas observed, collagen fibers were present only in area 1 in Case 1 but in areas 2 or 3 as well in Case 3. CONCLUSIONS: Fibrous collagen fibers appeared in regions in which LECs adhered and there was capsule contact with the IOL optic. In addition fibrous collagen fibers appeared in more areas in the eye with the silicone IOL than in that with the PMMA IOL, perhaps because IOLs with silicone optics move slightly while in the capsular bag.     

Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases of fibrous humans lens capsules with intraocular lenses

PURPOSE: We located immunohistochemically the matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) -1, -2, -3 and -9 and the tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases (TIMP) -1 and -2 in the fibrous capsule of patients with intraocular lenses (IOLs). METHODS: During vitreoretinal surgery in 10 patients we obtained post-cataract surgery lens capsules with or without an IOL. The mean interval between the previous cataract operation and the extraction of the specimens was 35.2 months (range: 2-120 months). Circular sections of the anterior capsule with lens epithelial cells (LECs) were also obtained during cataract surgery. Specimens were processed for immunohistochemical identification of MMPs and TIMPs by light microscopy. RESULTS: While all the members of MMPs and TIMPs were not detected in the normal anterior capsules, they were detected in the ECM and/or LECs on the lens capsules extracted within 18 months after IOL implantations in all of the 4 patients, but were not observed in specimens obtained 18 months or longer postoperatively. In LECs of 1 capsule specimen 10 years postoperatively, MMP-1, but not other MMPs and TIMPs, was detected. CONCLUSIONS: MMPs and TIMPs were detected in the ECM and/or LECs on post-cataract surgery capsules. These proteins may be remodeling the newly deposited ECM and regulating LEC behavior on residual lens capsules in the early phase of healing after cataract surgery.     

Interlenticular opacification in piggyback AcrySof intraocular lenses: explantation technique and laboratory investigations

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Interlenticular opacification (ILO) is a recognised complication of piggyback intraocular lenses (IOLs). The aetiology, histopathology, and treatment are not clearly defined, however. METHODS: Two pairs of AcrySof IOLs were explanted from a patient with bilateral ILO. The explantation technique and surgical challenges of IOL exchanges are described. The explanted IOL complexes and a sample of the anterior capsule were examined by phase, polarising, and immunofluorescence microscopy. RESULTS: A 50 year old man developed ILO bilaterally after piggyback AcrySof IOL implantation. A central contact zone was surrounded by a homogeneous paracentral opacity possibly consisting of extracellular matrix previously laid down by proliferating lens epithelial cells (LECs). These opacities were in turn surrounded by interlenticular Elschnig pearl-type opacities contiguous with the same material filling the periphery of the capsular bag. The IOL complexes were very adherent to the capsular bag and they had to be separated with the help of high viscosity viscoelastic before a single one piece PMMA IOL implantation via large limbal incisions. The sample of anterior capsule showed a ridge configuration from the piling of LECs in the site of apposition with the anterior capsule and cells showing different characteristics on either side of the ridge. CONCLUSION: Cellular proliferation, deposition of ECM from proliferating LECs, and capsular changes induced by cell metaplasia may lead to ILO formation in piggyback AcrySof IOLs. Careful separation of the AcrySof IOL complex from the capsule, meticulous clean up of the proliferating material, and implantation of single or dual in the bag PMMA IOLs through a large incision with capsulorrhexis enlargement may help in the prevention of recurrence of interface opacification.     

Adhesion of fibronectin, vitronectin, laminin, and collagen type IV to intraocular lens materials in pseudophakic human autopsy eyes. Part 1: histological sections

PURPOSE: To evaluate fibronectin, vitronectin, laminin, and collagen type IV adhesion to poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), silicone, hydrophobic soft acrylate, and hydrogel intraocular lenses (IOLs) in pseudophakic human autopsy eyes. SETTING: Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA. METHODS: Thirty-eight autopsy eyes containing PMMA, silicone, hydrophobic acrylate, or hydrogel IOLs were assessed. Histological sections were prepared from each eye, and immunohistochemical analyses were performed for fibronectin, vitronectin, laminin, and collagen type IV. One hundred fifty-two specimens were analyzed. RESULTS: A sandwich-like structure (anterior or posterior capsule/fibronectin/1 cell layer/fibronectin/IOL surface) was seen in 12 of 14 autopsy eyes with soft acrylate IOLs, 3 of 10 with a PMMA IOL (P =.0094), 1 of 10 with a silicone IOL (P =.0022), and 0 of 4 with a hydrogel IOL (P =. 0041). The thicker fibrocellular tissue on the inner surface of the anterior or posterior capsule that was in contact with silicone IOLs was lined with collagen type IV. Vitronectin and laminin were not found at the fibrocellular tissue-IOL interface in any specimen. CONCLUSIONS: This study seems to confirm the sandwich theory of posterior capsule opacification in eyes with an IOL and suggests that fibronectin may be the major extracellular protein responsible for the attachment of hydrophobic soft acrylate (AcrySof(R)) IOLs to the capsular bag. This may represent a true bioactive bond between the IOL and lens epithelial cells or between the IOL and the capsular bag and may be one reason the PCO and neodymium:YAG capsulotomy rates are lower in eyes with a soft acrylate IOL.     

Results of hydrophilic acrylic,hydrophobic acrylic,and silicone intraocular lenses in uveitic eyes with cataract: comparison to a control group

PURPOSE: To evaluate the uveal and capsular biocompatibility of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses (IOLs) in eyes with uveitis. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. METHODS: This prospective study comprised 72 eyes with uveitis and 68 control eyes having phacoemulsification and IOL implantation by 1 surgeon. Patients received 1 of the following IOLs: foldable hydrophilic acrylic (Hydroview, Bausch & Lomb), hydrophobic acrylic (AcrySof, Alcon), or silicone (CeeOn 911, Pharmacia). Postoperative evaluations were at 1, 3, and 7 days and 1, 3, and 6 months. Cell reaction was evaluated by specular microscopy of the anterior IOL surface and the anterior and posterior capsule reaction, by biomicroscopy. RESULTS: Small round cell deposition was observed on all IOLs in the immediate postoperative period, especially in eyes with uveitis. This reaction decreased 3 to 6 months after surgery. Although the CeeOn 911 had a higher mean grade of small cells, there was no statistical difference between the 3 IOL types after 6 months in the uveitis and control groups. Foreign-body giant cells (FBGCs) increased after 1 week to 1 month. The AcrySof IOLs had the highest number of FBGCs; after 6 months, there was a statistically significant difference between the AcrySof and Hydroview uveitis groups (P =.036) and the AcrySof and CeeOn 911 uveitis groups (P =.003) but there was no difference among the 3 IOL types in the control group. Lens epithelial cell outgrowth persisted on the Hydroview IOLs in control eyes and regressed on all 3 IOL types in uveitic eyes and on the AcrySof and CeeOn 911 IOLs in control eyes (P =.0001). Anterior capsule opacification (ACO) was more severe on all IOL types in uveitic eyes and on the CeeOn 911 IOL in control eyes. Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) was more severe in uveitic eyes. The Hydroview group had more severe PCO than the AcrySof and the CeeOn 911 groups in uveitis and control eyes. Six months postoperatively, the difference was significant (P =.0001). There was no significant difference between the AcrySof and CeeOn 911 IOLs. CONCLUSIONS: Intraocular lens biocompatibility is inversely related to inflammation. Hydrophilic acrylic material had good uveal but worse capsular biocompatibility. Hydrophobic acrylic material had lower uveal but better capsular biocompatibility. Silicone showed a higher small cell count (mild) and more severe ACO but achieved PCO results comparable to FBGC results and better than those with the AcrySof lens 6 months after surgery. Despite the differences in IOL biocompatibility, all patients benefited from the surgery.     

Effect of intraocular lens haptic compressibility on the posterior lens capsule after cataract surgery

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of intraocular lens (IOL) haptic compressibility on the posterior capsule after cataract surgery. SETTING: Teaching hospital, London, United Kingdom. METHODS: In this randomized prospective study, 60 patients had standardized phacoemulsification with in-the-bag placement of a poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) (Storz P497UV) or hydrogel (Storz Hydroview H60M) IOL. Both IOLs had PMMA haptics of identical configuration and length. The IOL haptic compressibility was measured in air and then during incubation in saline at 37 degrees C over 1 month. Digital retroillumination imaging was performed 1, 7, 28, 90, 180, 360, and 720 days postoperatively. The presence and duration of postoperative capsule folds were recorded and correlated with the haptic compressibility measurements, lens epithelial cell (LEC) growth patterns on the posterior capsule at 6 months, and the extent of posterior capsule opacification. RESULTS: On the first postoperative day, 21 patients (88%) in the Hydroview group had posterior capsule folds that persisted in 12 patients (50%) for 2 years. Nineteen patients (68%) in the PMMA group had folds at day 1 (P =.01), with 1 patient (3%) still having folds at 1 month (P =.0002) and no patient having folds at 3 months. At 6 months, 11 patients (46%) in the Hydroview group and no patient in the PMMA group had LEC growth in the direction of the folds. The PMMA IOLs showed a greater decrease in haptic compressibility during incubation. CONCLUSIONS: Haptic compressibility should be an important consideration in IOL design. The results suggest that to avoid posterior capsule folds, the compressibility should be less than 2.5 mN.     

Uveal and capsular biocompatibility of 2 foldable acrylic intraocular lenses in patients with uveitis or pseudoexfoliation syndrome: comparison to a control group

PURPOSE: To evaluate the uveal and capsular biocompatibility of hydrophilic acrylic (Hydroview) and hydrophobic acrylic (AcrySof) intraocular lenses (IOLs) after phacoemulsification in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX) or uveitis and compare the results with those in a control group. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.METHODS: This prospective nonrandomized comparative trial comprised 143 eyes recruited consecutively. Of these, 49 eyes had PEX, 43 had uveitis, and 51 served as controls. A standardized surgical protocol was used. Cell reaction, anterior (ACO) and posterior (PCO) capsule opacification, and flare were evaluated 1 year after cataract surgery. RESULTS: Regarding uveal biocompatibility, the number of foreign-body giant cells (FBGCs) increased in proportion to associated ocular pathologies in both IOL groups. The difference between the Hydroview control and Hydroview uveitis groups was statistically significant. The number of FBGCs was greater on AcrySof IOLs than on Hydroview IOLs in all 3 groups. The difference in FBGCs between the 2 IOL types was statistically significant in the control and PEX groups. Regarding capsular biocompatibility, lens epithelial cell (LEC) outgrowth was inversely correlated with intraocular inflammation. Outgrowth was statistically significantly higher with Hydroview IOLs, occurring in 85% in the control group, 45% in the PEX group, and 28% in the uveitis group (P <.0001). With AcrySof lenses, the percentages were 0%, 8%, and 4%, respectively. The PEX and uveitis groups were more likely to develop ACO than the control group (P <.012). There was no statistically significant difference in ACO between the 2 IOL types in the 3 patient groups. The PCO was statistically significantly greater in the uveitis group than in the control group (P <.026) and statistically significantly more dense on Hydroview than on AcrySof IOLs in all 3 patient groups (P <.002). Flare was statistically significantly higher in the uveitis group than in the PEX and control groups with both IOL types (P <.012). There was no statistically significant difference in flare between the 2 IOL types. CONCLUSIONS: Uveal and capsular biocompatibility depends on the intensity of ocular inflammation. The greater the inflammation, the less the biocompatibility of hydrophilic and hydrophobic acrylic materials. AcrySof stimulated more FBGCs. The Hydroview material had better uveal but poorer capsular biocompatibility than AcrySof. The sharp optic edge effect of the AcrySof IOL and the advantages of the Hydroview lens in normal eyes are less apparent in compromised eyes.     

Lens epithelial cell ongrowth: comparison of 6 types of hydrophilic intraocular lens models

PURPOSE: To compare the ongrowth of lens epithelial cells (LECs) on the anterior surface of 6 different hydrophilic intraocular lenses (IOLs). SETTING: Medical University of Vienna, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Vienna, Austria. METHODS: Six models of hydrophilic IOLs were compared in this prospective study: Visionflex A-100 (Distra Softcryl), Rayner Centerflex 570H (Rayner), Collamer CC4204BF-IOL (Staar), Injectacryl F 3000 (Distra), Hydroview H60M (Bausch & Lomb), and MemoryLens (ORC). Postoperative biomicroscopic examinations were performed 1, 3, 7, 30, 90, 180, and 365 days after surgery. Lens epithelial cells in each quadrant of the anterior capsule-free lens surface were graded. The product with the highest density and the number of quadrants with this density were used to measure LEC ongrowth. RESULTS: The Hydroview and Visionflex IOLs showed significantly more LECs than the other IOLs starting on day 7 after surgery (P < .028). There was a statistically significant difference in LEC ongrowth on the Memory IOL compared with all other IOLs from day 30 onward (P < .001). The Rayner, Collamer and Injectacryl IOLs had the fewest LECs on the anterior surface compared with all other IOLs from day 7 until the final examination. CONCLUSIONS: The findings show that LEC ongrowth on the IOL surface is material dependent. The findings suggest that the material of the recently developed hydrophilic IOLs induces less LEC ongrowth than older models.     

Biological compatibility of polymethyl methacrylate, hydrophilic acrylic and hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses

PURPOSE: Extensive clinical investigations of the biocompatibility of different intraocular lenses (IOLs) have been made in an effort to optimize the outcome of modern cataract surgery. The aim of this study was to add animal eye experimental implantation data regarding cellular reaction on the anterior surface of IOLs. METHODS: Thirteen adult albino rabbits had phacoemulsification/aspiration of the crystalline lens followed by implantation of a posterior chamber IOL in each eye. Three types of IOLs were studied: Hydroview (Bausch and Lomb; n = 7), Acrysof (Alcon, USA; n = 7), and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA; HOYA, Japan; n = 7). The animals were killed by intravenous pentobarbital 1, 4, or 8 weeks later. The IOLs were explanted and stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and observed under a light microscope. The shape of mouse ascites-induced macrophages on the anterior surface of the three different IOL types (Hydroview, PMMA, and Acrysof) was studied after 24 h of oven culture. RESULTS: Hydrophilic acrylic IOLs showed the highest affinity for lens epithelial cell (LEC) outgrowth, and the lowest and slowest maturation rate reaction of macrophages. PMMA IOLs showed the lowest affinity for LEC outgrowth, and the highest reaction of macrophages. Hydrophobic acrylic IOLs showed intermediate results both regarding LECs and macrophages. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that IOL biomaterial properties are the key factor that influences the quantity of monocytes/macrophages as well as the process of their maturation/senescence. LEC outgrowth is influenced both by the biomaterial of IOLs and by the monocyte/macrophage reaction.     

Adhesion of soluble fibronectin,vitronectin, and collagen type IV to intraocular lens materials

PURPOSE: To evaluate soluble fibronectin, vitronectin, and collagen type IV adhesion to poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), fluorine-surface-modified PMMA, silicone, hydrophobic and hydrophilic acrylate, and hydrogel intraocular lenses (IOLs) and determine whether hydrophobic and hydrophilic acrylate materials have different fibronectin-adhesion properties. SETTING: Department of Medical Biochemistry, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland. METHODS: One hundred fifty IOLs were incubated for 1 week at 37 degrees C with radioactive-iodine-labeled soluble fibronectin, vitronectin, or collagen type IV. Fifty IOLs were analyzed for each protein, 5 from each of 10 different IOL models (PMMA, Alcon MC60BM; fluorine-surface-modified PMMA, Chiron Fluorilens Centra-55F; silicone, Allergan Medical Optics SI-40NB and Pharmacia and Upjohn CeeOn 911A; hydrophobic soft acrylate, Alcon AcrySof MA60BM and SA30AL and AMO Sensar; hydrophilic soft acrylate, Ioltech Stabibag and Bausch and Lomb BL27; and hydrogel, Bausch and Lomb Hydroview. The amount of adherent protein was measured with a gamma counter at 1 and 7 days and expressed as counts per minute. RESULTS: At 1 week, significantly more fibronectin was bound to the hydrophobic acrylate IOLs than to the 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) containing hydrophilic acrylate IOLs (P <.05 to.0001). Significantly more vitronectin was bound to the 2 silicone IOLs than to any other IOL (P <.01 to.0001) at 7 days. Collagen type IV adhered best to the hydrophilic acrylate IOLs, which were significantly different (P <.01 to.0001) than the other IOLs at 1 and 7 days. CONCLUSIONS: Each IOL material had a different affinity to each protein. Significant binding to 1 protein does not indicate that the IOL will bind significantly to all proteins; instead, each protein should be studied separately. Fibronectin bound significantly better to hydrophobic acrylate IOLs than to hydrophilic acrylate IOLs, suggesting that the HEMA-containing IOLs should be classified with the hydrogel IOL group.     

Hydrophobic acrylic versus heparin surface-modified polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lens: a biocompatibility study

Background The implant of intraocular lenses (IOLs) following cataract surgery induces a foreign-body reaction to the IOL and a response on the part of the lens epithelial cells (LECs). The purpose of this study was to compare these aspects after the implantation of two different IOL materials.Methods Thirty-six cataract patients were randomised to receive two different foldable lens: an acrylic hydrophobic IOL (Acrysof MA30BA) and a heparin surface-modified (HSM) polymethylmethacrylate IOL (Pharmacia & Upjohn 809C) after phacoemulsification. Slit-lamp biomicroscopy with specular technique was used to assess the inflammatory cell adhesion on the anterior IOL surface, anterior capsule opacification (ACO) and membrane growth from the rhexis edge at 7, 30, 90, 180 and 360 days after surgery.Results The 809C group showed a higher percentage of patients with slight inflammatory cell adhesion on the anterior cell surface and a higher small cellular density during the whole follow-up period. The epithelioid cell response was greater in the 809C group than the Acrysof group but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. The ACO increased during the follow-up in both groups but was significantly higher in the 809C group.Conclusion Acrysof lenses are more biocompatible than HSM IOLs, showing a lower grade of inflammatory cell adhesion and ACO. The implantation of these lenses may be particularly indicated in patients with pathologies predisposing to blood–aqueous barrier damage.The authors have no proprietary or financial interest in any products or devices discussed in this paper and have not received any payment as reviewers or evaluators     

Uveal and capsular biocompatibility of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term response of 6 types of 3-piece intraocular lenses (IOLs) by assessing the cellular reaction on the anterior IOL surface, the behavior of posterior and anterior capsule fibrosis, and flare. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical School, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. METHODS: One hundred eighty eyes were prospectively randomized to receive 1 of 6 IOLs: hydrophilic acrylic Hydroview (Bausch & Lomb) or MemoryLens (ORC); hydrophobic acrylic AcrySof MA60BM (Alcon) or AMO Sensar AR40 (Allergan); hydrophobic silicone CeeOn 920 or CeeOn 911A (Pharmacia). The patients had standardized cataract surgery, postoperative medication, and follow-up. One year after surgery, 155 eyes were assessed. The cellular reaction was evaluated by specular microscopy of the anterior IOL surface. Anterior and posterior capsule opacification (PCO) was assessed semiquantitatively by biomicroscopy. Flare was measured with a Kowa FC-1000 laser flare-cell meter. RESULTS: Regarding uveal biocompatibility, the hydrophobic acrylic IOLs showed the highest incidence of late foreign-body cell reaction (AcrySof, 30%; AR40, 17%) followed by the hydrophilic acrylic (MemoryLens, 8%; Hydroview, 4%) and silicone (CeeOn 920, 4%; CeeOn 911A, 0%) (P =.0044). In all cases, the cellular reaction was low grade and clinically insignificant. Regarding capsular biocompatibility, some eyes developed lens epithelial cell (LEC) outgrowth on the anterior IOL surface. The highest incidence was in the hydrophilic acrylic group (Hydroview, 85%; MemoryLens, 27%) followed by the hydrophobic acrylic (AcrySof, 4%; AR40, 3%). No silicone IOL had LECs on the anterior surface. The difference among IOL groups was significant (P =.0001). Anterior capsule opacification was more predominant in the hydrophobic IOL groups. Posterior capsule opacification of the central 3.0 mm area was lowest in the groups with a sharp-edged optic (CeeOn 911A, AcrySof) followed by the round-edged silicone (CeeOn 920), hydrophobic acrylic (AR40), and hydrophilic acrylic IOLs (P =.0001). There was a significant difference in flare between the AR40 lens and the Hydroview, MemoryLens, CeeOn 911A, and CeeOn 920 (P <.004). There was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative cell count at 1 year. The power calculation showed that the sample size was sufficient. CONCLUSIONS: The differences in cellular reaction, although clinically mild in normal eyes, indicate that there were more giant cells with hydrophobic acrylic IOLs and an increased tendency toward LEC outgrowth with hydrophilic lenses. The incidence of PCO was lowest in the hydrophobic IOL groups, especially in groups with a sharp-edged optic. Second-generation silicone IOLs with a sharp edge had good uveal and capsular biocompatibility 1 year after surgery.     

Effect of anterior capsule polishing on fibrotic capsule opacification: three-year results

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term effect of anterior capsule polishing on anterior capsule opacification (ACO) and peripheral fibrotic posterior capsule opacification (PCO). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. METHODS: This randomized double-blind study comprised 104 eyes of 52 patients with bilateral age-related cataract. All patients received round-edged intraocular lenses (IOLs); 26 received an SI-40 IOL (Advanced Medical Optics Inc.) in both eyes, and 26 received a Silens6 IOL (Domilens) in both eyes. Both IOLs consist of different silicone material and have different haptic angulation. The SI-40 IOL has 13.0 mm open-loop poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) haptics angulated by 10 degrees. The Silens6 IOL has 12.5 mm open-loop PMMA haptics with no angulation. In 1 eye, the anterior capsule was extensively polished. The anterior capsule was left unpolished in the contralateral eye, which acted as a control. Digital slitlamp photographs of the ACO and fibrotic PCO were taken with a standardized technique for 3 years postoperatively. The intensity of ACO was measured objectively (score 0% to 100%) using Adobe Photoshop software. Fibrotic PCO was graded subjectively (score 0 to 4). RESULTS: The mean ACO was 17% in the polished eyes and 26% in the control eyes (P = .0001). The mean fibrotic PCO score was 0.5 and 1.0, respectively (P = .0007). The mean ACO was 15% in the polished SI-40 eyes and 26% in the control SI-40 eyes (P = .01). It was 19% in the polished Silens6 eyes and 26% in the control Silens6 eyes (P = .003). The mean fibrotic PCO score was 0.4 in the polished SI-40 eyes and 1.1 in the control SI-40 eyes (P = .0006). It was 0.6 in the polished Silens6 eyes and 0.9 in the control Silens6 eyes (P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: Three years after surgery, eyes in which the anterior capsule was extensively polished had less ACO and fibrotic PCO with both round-edged silicone IOLs. In eyes with Silens6 IOLs, however, the reduction in fibrotic PCO was not significant.     

Cellular reaction on the anterior surface of 4 types of intraocular lenses

PURPOSE: To assess the cellular reaction on the anterior surface of 4 types of foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. METHODS: One hundred eyes scheduled for cataract surgery were prospectively randomized into 4 groups of 25 eyes each using random number tables. Group 1 received a Hydroview IOL (Bausch & Lomb), Group 2 an AcrySof IOL (Alcon), Group 3 a MemoryLens IOL (ORC), and Group 4 a CeeOn 920 IOL (Pharmacia). Patients were examined 1, 3, 7, 30, 90, and 180 days postoperatively. Postoperative biomicroscopic examinations were done with a slitlamp, and a specular microscope was used to document the presence of cell deposits and identify areas with the highest density of cells. RESULTS: The local tissue response revealed 2 patterns: a nonspecific foreign-body reaction to the IOL (small round, fibroblast-like, epithelioid, and giant cells) and a lens epithelial cell (LEC) reaction. The highest incidence of LECs was in the Hydroview group, in which LECs were present on 81.8% of lenses 180 days postoperatively. During the first postoperative days, small round and fibroblast-like cells were found on all IOLs. From 7 days on, the incidence and density of these cells were less severe in the Hydroview and CeeOn 920 groups. After several weeks, epithelioid cells and foreign-body giant cells were seen on some IOLs. These cells appeared more often on AcrySof, MemoryLens, and CeeOn IOLs. CONCLUSION: This study found IOL-related differences in cellular reaction after cataract surgery. The incidence of a nonspecific foreign-body reaction to 4 IOLs is consistent with the results of previous studies. The incidence of LECs was highest in the Hydroview group and lowest in the AcrySof group. The CeeOn 920 group had the lowest incidence of all types of cells.     

Selenium functionalized intraocular lenses inhibit posterior capsule opacification in an ex vivo canine lens capsular bag assay

The purpose of this study was to determine the inhibitory effect of selenocystamine coated intraocular lenses (IOLs) on the formation of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) in an ex vivo canine lens capsular bag assay. Selenocystamine was covalently bound to the surface of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (poly(HEMA)) discs. Three groups of canine lens capsules (6 coated IOLs (SeIOLs), 7 non-coated control IOLs and 8 empty capsules) were cultured for 10 days. During the culture period PCO was scored based on visual inspection of the capsules using phase contrast microscopy. On day 10 all the capsules were prepared for light microscopic examination and lens epithelial cells (LECs) were quantified. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and cleaved caspase-3 were examined by immunohistochemistry. Additionally, cell viability assays were performed on LECs cultured in tissue culture medium pre-incubated with either a SeIOL or control IOL. The viability assays demonstrated that no detectable cytotoxic leachables were associated with the functionalized IOLs. The central posterior capsule was free of cells underneath all SeIOLs, although large numbers of LECs populated the capsular periphery. Apoptotic cells were observed underneath the periphery of some SeIOLs. Both the PCO scores and LEC counts of SeIOL containing capsules were significantly lower than those of control group capsules (p < 0.01 and p = 0.0004, respectively).The use of selenium functionalized IOLs resulted in a significant reduction of PCO in this ex vivo model. Binding of selenocystamine to a foldable IOL may provide an effective method to prevent population of the central posterior capsule with LECs.     

Effect of surface coating an acrylic intraocular lens with poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) polymer on lens epithelial cell line behavior

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of surface coating of an acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) with poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) (MPC) on the behavior of the lens epithelial cell (LEC) line, alpha-TN4. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. METHODS: A hydrophobic soft acrylic IOL (AF-1, Hoya) was coated with MPC polymer. A noncoated IOL served as control. An IOL from each group was placed on the membrane of collagen I or IV of the cell culture dish. The alpha-TN4 cells were seeded in the insert. Cell behaviors (ie, cell proliferation and spreading) on IOLs and membranes were observed. Cell migration beneath the IOL optic portion was assayed using a computer software program (POCOman system) for posterior capsule opacification (PCO). Type I or IV collagen is the major matrix component of PCO or native lens capsule. RESULTS: Cell proliferation was more marked on the noncoated IOL than on the coated IOL. Type IV collagen accelerated proliferation more than type I collagen. Cell migration to the area beneath the IOL optic was more prominent in the group with the type I collagen membrane and noncoated IOL than in other groups. CONCLUSION: Coating an acrylic IOL surface with MPC polymer suppressed adhesion and proliferation of LECs, suggesting it improves IOL biocompatibility.