Amino acid and protein targets of 1,2-diacetylbenzene,a potent aromatic gamma-diketone that induces proximal neurofilamentous axonopathy

Determining the key events in the induction of liver cancer in mice by trichloroethylene (TRI) is important in the determination of how risks from this chemical should be treated at low doses. At least two metabolites can contribute to liver cancer in mice, dichloroacetate (DCA) and trichloroacetate (TCA). TCA is produced from metabolism of TRI at systemic concentrations that can clearly contribute to this response. As a peroxisome proliferator and a species-specific carcinogen, TCA may not be important in the induction of liver cancer in humans at the low doses of TRI encountered in the environment. Because DCA is metabolized much more rapidly than TCA, it has not been possible to directly determine whether it is produced at carcinogenic levels. Unlike TCA, DCA is active as a carcinogen in both mice and rats. Its low-dose effects are not associated with peroxisome proliferation. The present study examines whether biomarkers for DCA and TCA can be used to determine if the liver tumor response to TRI seen in mice is completely attributable to TCA or if other metabolites, such as DCA, are involved. Previous work had shown that DCA produces tumors in mice that display a diffuse immunoreactivity to a c-Jun antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, SC-45), whereas TCA-induced tumors do not stain with this antibody. In the present study, we compared the c-Jun phenotype of tumors induced by DCA or TCA alone to those induced when they are given together in various combinations and to those induced by TRI given in an aqueous vehicle. When given in various combinations, DCA and TCA produced a few tumors that were c-Jun+, many that were c-Jun-, but a number with a mixed phenotype that increased with the relative dose of DCA. Sixteen TRI-induced tumors were c-Jun+, 13 were c-Jun-, and 9 had a mixed phenotype. Mutations of the H-ras protooncogene were also examined in DCA-, TCA-, and TRI-induced tumors. The mutation frequency detected in tumors induced by TCA was significantly different from that observed in TRI-induced tumors (0.44 vs 0.21, p < 0.05), whereas that observed in DCA-induced tumors (0.33) was intermediate between values obtained with TCA and TRI, but not significantly different from TRI. No significant differences were found in the mutation spectra of tumors produced by the three compounds. The presence of mutations in H-ras codon 61 appeared to be a late event, but ras-dependent signaling pathways were activated in all tumors. These data are not consistent with the hypothesis that all liver tumors induced by TRI were produced by TCA.     

Liver tumor induction in B6C3F1 mice by dichloroacetate and trichloroacetate

Male and female B6C3F1 mice were administered dichloroacetate (DCA) and trichloroacetate (TCA) in their drinking water at concentrations of 1 or 2 g/l for up to 52 weeks. Both compounds induced hepatoproliferative lesions (HPL) in male mice, including hepatocellular nodules, adenomas and hepatocellular carcinomas within 12 months. The induction of HPL by TCA was linear with dose. In contrast, the response to DCA increased sharply with the increase in concentration from 1 to 2 g/l. Suspension of DCA treatment at 37 weeks resulted in the same number of HPL at 52 weeks that would have been predicted on the basis of the total dose administered. However, none of the lesions in this treatment group progressed to hepatocellular carcinomas. Conversely, the yield of HPL at 52 weeks when TCA treatment was suspended at 37 weeks was significantly below that which would have been predicted by the total dose administered. In this case, 3 of 5 remaining lesions were hepatocellular carcinomas. Throughout active treatment DCA-treated mice displayed greatly enlarged livers characterized by a marked cytomegaly and massive accumulations of glycogen in hepatocytes throughout the liver. Areas of focal necrosis were seen throughout the liver. TCA produced small increases in cell size and much a more modest accumulation of glycogen. Focal necrotic damage did not occur in TCA-treated animals. TCA produced marked accumulations of lipofuscin in the liver. Lipofuscin accumulation was less marked with DCA. These data confirm earlier observations that DCA and TCA are capable of inducing hepatic tumors in B6C3F1 mice and argue that the mechanisms involved in tumor induction differ substantially between these two similar compounds. Tumorigenesis by DCA may depend largely on stimulation of cell division secondary to hepatotoxic damage. On the other hand, TCA appears to increase lipid peroxidation, suggesting that production of radicals may be responsible for its effects.     

Effect of Dichloroacetic Acid and Trichloroacetic Acid on DNA Methylation in Liver and Tumors of Female B6C3F1 Mice

Dichloroacetic acid (DCA) and trichloroacetic add (TCA) arefound in drinking water and are metabolites of trichloroethylene.They are carcinogenic and promote liver tumors in B6C3F1 mice.Hypomethylation of DNA is a proposed nongenotoxic mechanisminvolved in carcinogenesis and tumor promotion. We determinedthe effect of DCA and TCA on the level of DNA methylation inmouse liver and tumors. Female B6C3F1 mice 15 days of age wereadministered 25 mg/kg N-methyl-N-nitrosourea and at 6 weeksstarted to receive 25 mmol/liter of either DCA or TCA in theirdrinking water until euthanized 44 weeks later. Other animalsnot administered MNU were euthanized after 11 days of exposureto either DCA or TCA. DNA was isolated from liver and tumors,and after hydrolysis 5-methylcytosine (5MeC) and the four baseswere separated and quantitated by HPLC. In animals exposed toeither DCA or TCA for 11 days but not 44 weeks, the level of5MeC in DNA was decreased in the liver. 5MeC was also decreasedin liver tumors from animals exposed to either chloroaceticacid. The level of 5MeC in TCA-promoted carcinomas appearedto be less than in adenomas. Termination of exposure to DCA,but not to TCA, resulted in an increase in the level of 5MeCin adenomas to the level found in noninvolved liver. Thus, hypomethylatedDNA was found in DCA and TCA promoted liver tumors and the differencein the response of DNA methylation to termination of exposureappeared to support the hypothesis of different mechanisms fortheir carcinogenic activity.     

Differential effects of dihalogenated and trihalogenated acetates in the liver of B6C3F1 mice

Haloacetates are produced in the chlorination of drinking water in the range 10--100 microg l(-1). As bromide concentrations increase, brominated haloacetates such as bromodichloroacetate (BDCA), bromochloroacetate (BCA) and dibromoacetate (DBA) appear at higher concentrations than the chlorinated haloacetates: dichloroacetate (DCA) or trichloroacetate (TCA). Both DCA and TCA differ in their hepatic effects; TCA produces peroxisome proliferation as measured by increases in cyanide-insensitive acyl CoA oxidase activity, whereas DCA increases glycogen concentrations. In order to determine whether the brominated haloacetates DBA, BCA and BDCA resemble DCA or TCA more closely, mice were administered DBA, BCA and BDCA in the drinking water at concentrations of 0.2--3 g l(-1). Both BCA and DBA caused liver glycogen accumulation to a similar degree as DCA (12 weeks). The accumulation of glycogen occurred in cells scattered throughout the acinus in a pattern very similar to that observed in control mice. In contrast, TCA and low concentrations of BDCA (0.3 g l(-1)) reduced liver glycogen content, especially in the central lobular region. The high concentration of BDCA (3 g l(-1)) produced a pattern of glycogen distribution similar to that in DCA-treated and control mice. This effect with a high concentration of BDCA may be attributable to the metabolism of BDCA to DCA. All dihaloacetates reduced serum insulin levels. Conversely, trihaloacetates had no significant effects on serum insulin levels. Dibromoacetate was the only brominated haloacetate that consistently increased acyl-CoA oxidase activity and rates of cell replication in the liver. These results further distinguish the effects of the dihaloacetates from those of peroxisome proliferators like TCA.     

The carcinogenicity of trichloroethylene and its metabolites, trichloroacetic acid and dichloroacetic acid, in mouse liver

Trichloroethylene (TCE) has previously been shown to be carcinogenic in mouse liver when administered by daily gavage in corn oil. The metabolism of TCE results, in part, in the formation of trichloroacetic acid (TCA) as a major metabolite and dichloroacetic acid (DCA) as a minor metabolite. These chlorinated acetic acids have not been shown to be genotoxic, although they have been shown to induce peroxisome proliferation. Therefore, we determined the ability they have been shown to induce peroxisome proliferation. Therefore, we determined the ability of TCE, TCA, or DCA to act as tumor promoters in mouse liver. Male B6C3F1 mice were administered intraperitoneally 0, 2.5, or 10 micrograms/g body wt ethylnitrosourea (ENU) on Day 15 of age. At 28 days of age, the mice were placed on drinking water containing either TCE (3 or 40 mg/liter), TCA (2 or 5 g/liter), or DCA (2 or 5 g/liter). All drinking waters were neutralized with NaOH to a final pH of 6.5-7.5. The animals were killed after 61 weeks of exposure to the treated drinking water (65 weeks of age). Both DCA and TCA at a concentration of 5 g/liter were carcinogenic without prior initiation with ENU, resulting in hepatocellular carcinomas in 81 and 32% of the animals, respectively. DCA and TCA also increased the incidence of animals with adenomas and the number of adenomas/animal in those animals that were not initiated with ENU. While 2.5 micrograms/g body wt ENU followed by NaCl in the drinking water resulted in only 5% of the animals with hepatocellular carcinomas, 2.5 micrograms/g body wt ENU followed with 2 or 5 g/liter DCA resulted in a 66 or 78% incidence of carcinoma, respectively, or, followed with 2 or 5 g/liter TCA, resulted in a 48% incidence at either concentration. None of the untreated animals had hepatocellular carcinomas. Therefore our results demonstrate that DCA and TCA are complete hepatocarcinogens in B6C3F1 mice.     

Effects of dichloroacetate (DCA) on serum insulin levels and insulin-controlled signaling proteins in livers of male B6C3F1 mice.

DCA is hepatocarcinogenic in rodents. At carcinogenic doses, DCA causes a large accumulation of liver glycogen. Thus, we studied the effects of DCA treatment on insulin levels and expression of insulin-controlled signaling proteins in the liver. DCA treatment (0.2-2.0 g/l in drinking water for 2 weeks) reduced serum insulin levels. The decrease persisted for at least 8 weeks. In livers of mice treated with DCA for 2-, 10-, and 52-week periods, insulin receptor (IR) protein levels were significantly depressed. Additionally, protein kinase B (PKBalpha) expression decreased significantly with DCA treatment. In normal liver, glycogen levels were increased as early as at 1 week, and this effect preceded changes in insulin and IR and PKBalpha. In contrast to normal liver, IR protein was elevated in DCA-induced liver tumors relative to that in liver tissue of untreated animals and to an even greater extent when compared to adjacent normal liver in the treated animal. Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAP kinase) phosphorylation was also increased in tumor tissue relative to normal liver tissue and tissue from untreated controls. These data suggest that normal hepatocytes down-regulate insulin-signaling proteins in response to the accumulation of liver glycogen caused by DCA. Furthermore, these results suggest that the initiated cell population, which does not accumulate glycogen and is promoted by DCA treatment, responds differently from normal hepatocytes to the insulin-like effects of this chemical. The differential sensitivity of the 2 cell populations may contribute to the tumorigenic effects of DCA in the liver.     

Hypomethylation of DNA and the insulin-like growth factor-II gene in dichloroacetic and trichloroacetic acid-promoted mouse liver tumors

Dichloroacetic acid (DCA) and trichloroacetic acid (TCA) are mouse liver carcinogens. DNA hypomethylation is a common molecular event in cancer that is induced by DCA and TCA. Hypomethylation of DNA and the insulin-like growth factor-II (IGF-II) gene was determined in DCA- and TCA-promoted liver tumors. Mouse liver tumors were initiated by N-methyl-N-nitrosourea and promoted by either DCA or TCA. By dot-blot analysis using an antibody for 5-methylcytosine, the DNA in DCA- and TCA-promoted tumors was demonstrated to be hypomethylated. The methylation status of 28 CpG sites in the differentially methylated region-2 (DMR-2) of mouse IGF-II gene was determined. In liver, 79.3 +/- 1.7% of the sites were methylated, while in DCA- and TCA-treated mice, only 46.4 +/- 2.1% and 58.0 +/- 1.7% of them were methylated and 8.7 +/- 2.6% and 10.7 +/- 7.4% were methylated in tumors. The decreased methylation found in liver from mice exposed to DCA or TCA occurred only in the upstream region of DMR-2, while in tumors it occurred throughout the probed region. mRNA expression of the IGF-II gene was increased in DCA- and TCA-promoted liver tumors but not in non-involved liver from DCA- and TCA-exposed mice. The results support the hypothesis that DNA hypomethylation is involved in the mechanism for the tumorigenicity of DCA and TCA.     

Species differences in the metabolism of trichloroethylene to the carcinogenic metabolites trichloroacetate and dichloroacetate.

Differing rates and extent of trichloroethylene (TCE) metabolism have been implicated as being responsible for varying sensitivities of mice and rats to the hepatocarcinogenic effects of TCE. Recent data indicate that the induction of hepatic tumors in mice may be attributed to the metabolites trichloroacetate (TCA) and/or dichloroacetate (DCA). The present study was directed at determining whether mice and rats varied in (1) the peak blood concentrations, (2) the area under the blood concentration over time curves (AUC) for TCE and metabolites in blood, and (3) the net excretion of TCE to these metabolites in urine in the dose range used in the cancer bioassays of TCE, and to contrast the kinetic parameters observed for TCE-derived TCA and DCA with those obtained following direct administration of TCA and DCA. Blood and urine samples were collected over 72 hr from rats and mice after a single oral dose of TCE of 1.5 to 23 mmol/kg. The AUC values from the blood concentration with time profiles of TCE, TCA, and trichloroethanol (TCOH) were similar for Sprague-Dawley rats and B6C3F1 mice. Likewise, the percentages of initial TCE dose recovered as the urinary metabolites TCA and TCOH were comparable. Nevertheless, the peak blood concentrations of TCE, TCA, and TCOH observed in mice were much greater than those in rats, while the residence time of TCE and metabolites was prolonged in rats relative to that of mice. DCA was detected in the blood of mice but not in rats. The blood concentrations of DCA observed in mice given a carcinogenic dose of TCE (15 mmol/kg) were of the same magnitude as those observed with carcinogenic doses of DCA. In conclusion, the net metabolism of TCE to TCA and TCOH was similar in rats and mice. The initial rates of metabolism of TCE to TCA, however, were much higher in mice, especially as the TCE dose was increased, leading to greater concentrations of TCA and DCA in mice approximated those produced by carcinogenic doses of the chlorinated acetates makes it highly likely that both compounds play a role in the induction of hepatic tumors in mice by TCE.     

Metabolism and lipoperoxidative activity of trichloroacetate and dichloroacetate in rats and mice.

Trichloroacetate (TCA) and dichloroacetate (DCA) have been shown to be hepatocarcinogenic in mice when administered in drinking water. However, DCA produces pathological effects in the liver that are much more severe than those observed following TCA treatment in both rats and mice. To identify potential mechanisms involved in the liver pathology, the biotransformation of TCA and DCA was investigated in male Fischer 344 rats and B6C3F1 mice. Rodents were administered 5, 20, or 100 mg/kg [14C]TCA or [14C]DCA as a single oral dose in water. Elimination was examined by counting radioactivity in urine, feces, exhaled air, and carcass. Blood concentration over time curves were constructed for both TCA and DCA at the 20 and 100 mg/kg doses. Analysis of the data reveals two significant differences in the systemic clearance of TCA relative to DCA. First, DCA was much more extensively metabolized than TCA. More than 50% of any single dose of TCA was excreted unchanged in the urine of both rats and mice. In contrast, less than 2% of any dose of DCA was recovered in the urine as the parent compound. Second, while the blood concentration over time curves for TCA were similar in rats and mice, the blood concentrations of DCA were markedly greater in rats compared to those in mice, both when DCA was administered and when DCA resulted from metabolism of TCA. DCA was detected in the urine of TCA-treated animals and chloroacetate was found in the urine of DCA-treated animals. These metabolic products would be expected to arise from a free radical-generating, reductive dechlorination pathway. To evaluate the ability of acute doses of TCA and DCA to elicit a lipoperoxidative response, additional groups of mice were administered 0, 100, 300, 1000, and 2000 mg/kg TCA or DCA and thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) measured in liver homogenates. Both TCA and DCA enhanced the formation of TBARS in a dose-dependent manner, thereby providing further evidence of a reductive metabolic pathway. DCA was found to be the more potent of the chlorinated acetates in increasing TBARS formation in the livers of both rats and mice. In view of these data, it appears that the more extensive metabolism and rapid rate of elimination of DCA relative to TCA and the more potent lipoperoxidative activity of DCA may be important factors in the pathological effects associated with DCA treatment.     

Effects of dichloroacetate on glycogen metabolism in B6C3F1 mice

Dichloroacetate (DCA) is a by-product of drinking water chlorination. Administration of DCA in drinking water results in accumulation of glycogen in the liver of B6C3F1 mice. To investigate the processes affecting liver glycogen accumulation, male B6C3F1 mice were administered DCA in drinking water at levels varying from 0.1 to 3 g/l for up to 8 weeks. Liver glycogen synthase (GS) and glycogen phosphorylase (GP) activities, liver glycogen content, serum glucose and insulin levels were analyzed. To determine whether effects were primary or attributable to increased glycogen synthesis, some mice were fasted and administered a glucose challenge (20 min before sacrifice). DCA treatments in drinking water caused glycogen accumulation in a dose-dependent manner. The DCA treatment in drinking water suppressed the activity ratio of GS measured in mice sacrificed at 9:00 AM, but not at 3:00 AM. However, net glycogen synthesis after glucose challenge was increased with DCA treatments for 1–2 weeks duration, but the effect was no longer observed at 8 weeks. Degradation of glycogen by fasting decreased progressively as the treatment period was increased, and no longer occurred at 8 weeks. A shift of the liver glycogen–iodine spectrum from DCA-treated mice was observed relative to that of control mice, suggesting a change in the physical form of glycogen. These data suggest that DCA-induced glycogen accumulation at high doses is related to decreases in the degradation rate. When DCA was administered by single intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection to naïve mice at doses of 2–200 mg/kg at the time of glucose challenge, a biphasic response was observed. Doses of 10–25 mg/kg increased both plasma glucose and insulin concentrations. In contrast, very high i.p. doses of DCA (>75 mg/kg) produced progressive decreases in serum glucose and glycogen deposition in the liver. Since the blood levels of DCA produced by these higher i.p. doses were significantly higher than observed with drinking water treatment, we conclude that apparent differences with data of previous investigations is related to substantial differences in systemic dose and/or dose–time relations.     

Evaluation of the role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) in mouse liver tumor induction by trichloroethylene and metabolites

Trichloroethylene (TCE) is an industrial solvent and a widespread environmental contaminant. Induction of liver cancer in mice by TCE is thought to be mediated by two metabolites, dichloroacetate (DCA) and trichloroacetate (TCA), both of which are themselves mouse liver carcinogens. TCE, TCA, and DCA are relatively weak peroxisome proliferators (PP), a group of rodent hepatocarcinogens that activate a nuclear receptor, PP-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha. The objective of this review is to assess the weight of evidence (WOE) that PPARalpha is or is not mechanistically involved in mouse liver tumor induction by TCE and metabolites. Based on similarities of TCE and TCA to typical PP, including dose-response characteristics showing PPARalpha-dependent responses coincident with liver tumor induction and abolishment of TCE and TCA effects in PPARalpha-null mice, the WOE supports the hypothesis that PPARalpha plays a dominant role in TCE- and TCA-induced hepatocarcinogenesis. Data indicates that the MOA for DCA tumor induction is PPARalpha-independent. Uncertainties remain regarding the genesis of the TCE-induced tumors. In contrast to the TCA-induced tumors, which have molecular features similar to those induced by typical PP, there is evidence, albeit weak, that TCE tumors arise by a mode of action (MOA) different from that of TCA tumors, based largely on dissimilarities in molecular markers found in TCE versus TCA-induced tumors. In summary, the WOE indicates that TCA-induced liver tumors arise by a PPARalpha-dependent MOA. Although the TCE MOA is likely dominated by a PPARalpha-dependent contribution from TCA, the contribution of a PPARalpha-independent MOA from DCA cannot be ruled out.     

In vivo MRI measurements of tumor growth induced by dichloroacetate: implications for mode of action

Dichloroacetate (DCA) is an important by-product of the chlorination of drinking water that produces liver cancer in rodents. Assessment of the risk that results from concentrations that occur in drinking water will be dependent upon the mode of action held responsible for these tumors. A study by Stauber and Bull [Stauber, A.J. and Bull, R. J (1997) Differences in phenotype and cell replicative behavior of hepatic tumors inducted by dichloroacetate (DCA) and trichloroacetate (TCA). Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 144, 235-246] in mice treated with DCA demonstrated a lesion distribution that was skewed towards many small, altered foci of cells that are assumed to be precursor lesions [EPA, (1996). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Proposed Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment; notice. Fed. Reg. 61, pp. 17960-10811]. The present study was designed to determine the extent to which the tumorigenic effects of DCA could be explained by its effect on tumor growth rates (i.e. tumor promoting activity). In vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allowed accurate determination of growth rates of individual lesions in mice that had been treated with DCA in drinking water at 2 g/l. Out of thirty treated mice, ten were found to have hepatic tumors detectable by MRI at 48 weeks of treatment. These tumor-bearing animals were assigned to two groups matched on the size of lesions observed by in vivo MR1. Treatment with DCA continued in one group of five mice and was stopped in the other. For both groups, tumor growth rates were determined by measuring changes in size of all lesions greater than 1 mm(3) in volume during a 14-day period. Removal of DCA treatment resulted in growth rates that could not be distinguished from zero across all lesion sizes represented in the sample. These data are in agreement with previous observations of DCAs effects on replication rates within tumors (Stauber and Bull, (1997)). Tumor growth rates observed in animals maintained on treatment decreased with lesion volume in a manner that is consistent with a stochastic Gompertz birth-death process proposed by Tan [Tan, W.Y. (1986) A stochastic Gompertz birth-death process. Stat. Prob. Lett. 4, 25-28]. Parameters of this model obtained by fitting measured growth rates were used to predict the lesion-size distribution expected after one year of DCA treatment. The shape of the predicted lesion-size distribution was similar to that observed by Stauber and Bull (Stauber and Bull, (1997)) in mice sacrificed after 40 weeks of DCA treatment. We conclude that the effects of DCA on the division and/or death rates of spontaneously initiated cells can account for the predominance of small lesions in DCA-treated animals.     

Dichloroacetic acid and trichloroacetic acid-induced DNA strand breaks are independent of peroxisome proliferation

This study examined whether the induction of single strand breaks in hepatic DNA by dichloroacetic acid (DCA) and trichloroacetic acid (TCA) depends upon peroxisome proliferation. Male B6C3F1 mice were given a single oral dose of either DCA or TCA. At varying times, between 1 and 24 h after administration of the compounds, breaks in DNA were measured using an alkaline unwinding assay. Peroxisome proliferation was monitored at the same time intervals in a parallel experiment by measuring peroxisomal B-oxidation of [14C]palmitoyl-CoA in liver homogenates. Both DCA and TCA significantly increased breaks in DNA at 1, 2, and 4 h post-treatment, with a return to control levels after 8 h. No evidence for an increase in peroxisomal beta-oxidation was produced by either chemical up to 24 h after administration. In a separate experiment, mice were treated with DCA or TCA for 10 days and their livers examined for evidence of peroxisome proliferation. An increase in liver weight was observed, particularly with DCA. Both TCA and DCA increased peroxisomal beta-oxidation in liver homogenates, with TCA-treated animals showing more activity than those treated with DCA. Electron microscopy revealed that the number of peroxisomes were approximately the same in DCA- and TCA-treated animals. However, peroxisomes induced by DCA treatment frequently lacked nucleoid cores. These data indicate that peroxisomes induced by these compounds differ in their concentration of peroxisomal enzymes. Except for a slight hypertrophy, repeated doses of TCA do not produce significant degenerative changes in the liver of mice. Repeated doses of DCA produce multifocal, subcapsular necrotic regions, and a marked hypertrophic response in the liver. Mice treated with TCA for 10 days and sacrificed 24 h after the last dose did not display increased strand breaks in hepatic DNA. This indicates that peroxisomal proliferation does not contribute to the induction of DNA strand breaks.     

The Carcinogenicity of Dichloroacetic Acid in the Male B6C3F1 Mouse

Groups of male B6C3F, mice (N = 50) were provided drinking watercontaining 2 g/liter sodium chloride (control) and 0.05,0.5,and 5 g/liter dichloroacetic acid (DCA). Treatment of 30 animalsin each group was carried out to 60 or 75 weeks. In a separateexperiment, mice exposed to 3.5 g/liter DCA and the correspondingacetic acid control group were killed at 60 weeks. Groups of5 mice were killed at 4, 15, 30, and 45 weeks. Time-weightedmean daily doses of 7.6, 77, 410, and 486 mg/kg/day were calculatedfor 0.05, 0.5, 3.5, and 5 g/liter DCA treatments. Animals exposedto 3.5 and 5 g/liter DCA had final body weights that were 87and 83%, respectively, of the control value. Relative liverweights of 136, 230, and 351% of the control value were measuredfor 0.5, 3.5, and 5 g/liter, respectively. At 60 weeks micereceiving 5.0 g/liter DCA had a 90% prevalence of liver neoplasiawith a mean multiplicity of 4.50 tumors/animal. Exposure to3.5 g/ liter DCA for 60 weeks resulted in a 100% tumor prevalencewith an average of 4.0 tumors/ animal. The prevalence of liverneoplasia and tumor multiplicity at 60 and 75 weeks in the 0.05g/liter DCA (24.1%; 0.31 tumors/animal) and in the 0.5 g/litergroup (11.1%; 0.11 tumors/animal) did not differ significantlyfrom the control value (7.1% and 0.07 tumors/animal). No livertumors were found in the group treated with acetic acid. Hyperplasticnodules were seen in the 3.5 (58%; 0.92/animal) and 5 g/literDCA groups (83% 1.27/animal). There was a significant positivedose-related trend in the age-adjusted prevalence of liver tumors.These data confirm the hepatocar-cinogenicity of DCA administeredin the drinking water to male B6C3F, mice for 60 weeks. Theresults together with those in an earlier report from this laboratorysuggest, for the conditions under which these assays were conducted,a threshold concentration of at least 0.5 g/liter followed bya steep rise to a maximum tumor incidence at 2 g/liter DCA.     

Dichloroacetate and Trichloroacetate Promote Clonal Expansion of Anchorage-Independent Hepatocytesin Vivoandin Vitro

Dichloroacetate (DCA) and trichloroacetate (TCA) are hepatocarcinogenic by-products of water chlorination and metabolites of several industrial solvents. To determine whether DCA and TCA promote the clonal expansion of anchorage-independent liver cellsin vitro,a modification of the soft agar assay (over agar assay) was utilized to quantitate growth and analyze phenotype of anchorage-independent hepatocellular colonies. Hepatocytes from na?&#x0308;ve male B6C3F1 mice were isolated and cultured with 0–2.0 mM DCA or TCA over agar for 10 days, at which time colonies of eight cells or more were scored. Both DCA and TCA promoted the formation of anchorage-independent colonies in a dose-dependent manner. Immunocytochemical analysis using a c-Jun antibody demonstrated that colonies promoted by DCA were primarily c-Jun⁺, whereas TCA-promoted colonies were primarily c-Jun⁻. This corresponds to thedifferences in c-Jun immunoreactivity reported in tumors induced by DCA and TCA. Neither DCA nor TCA inducedc-Jun expression in hepatocyte monolayers, indicating that these haloacetates selectively affect subpopulations of anchor-age-independent hepatocytes. The latency of colony forma-tion was decreased by the concentration of DCA, althoughthe same number of colonies appeared after 25 days in culture at all DCA concentrations used. The plating density of hepa-tocytes also affected colony formation. At lower cell densi-ties, promotion of colony formation by DCA was significantly reduced. Pretreatment of male B6C3F1 mice with 0.5 g/literDCA in drinking water resulted in a fourfold increase ininvitrocolony formation above hepatocytes isolated from na?&#x0308;vemice, suggesting that DCA is promoting the clonal expansionof anchorage-independent hepatocytesin vivo.Results from this study indicate that DCA and TCA promote the survival and growth of initiated cells. Furthermore, results from over agar assays reflect observations madein vivo,indicating thisassay provides a valid means to investigate the mechanismby which chemicals promote clonal expansion of initiated hepatocytes.     

Subacute toxicity of trichloroacetic acid in male and female rats

Trichloroacetic acid, TCA, is a water chlorination by-product similar to dichloroacetic acid, DCA. Because DCA has been shown to have effects on intermediary metabolism, TCA was tested to determine if it possesses similar capabilities. The effects were more pronounced in females. High doses of TCA (2.45 mumol/kg three times) decreased plasma glucose and lactate concentrations and liver lactate concentration. DCA had similar, less pronounced effects. In males DCA and TCA each decreased plasma lactate concentrations. Rats were exposed to TCA in drinking water for 14 days. The highest concentration (2.38 g/l) caused decreases of water and food consumption and loss of body weight. At 7 days females had decreased urine volume accompanied by a modest increase of urine osmolality, resulting in a significant decrease of excretion of solute. Concentrations of glucose in plasma and lactate in tissues were not significantly affected by this subchronic TCA exposure. These results indicate that TCA may have effects on intermediary metabolism similar to those of DCA.     

Early induction of reparative hyperplasia in the liver of B6C3F1 mice treated with dichloroacetate and trichloroacetate

Trichloroacetate (TCA) and dichloroacetate (DCA) were administered at concentrations of 0, 300, 1000 or 2000 mg/l in the drinking water of male B6C3F1 and male and female Swiss-Webster mice for up to 14 days. At 2, 5 or 14 days of treatment, mice were injected with [3H]thymidine 2 h prior to sacrifice. The livers were examined histologically and autoradiographically and DNA was isolated and counted. As observed in chronic studies dichloroacetate induced a marked increase in liver weights, but only after 14 days of treatment and local necrosis in both B6C3F1 and Swiss-Webster mice. A significant increase in the labeling index of hepatocytes was observed in animals treated with DCA, but only at 14 days of treatment. No such increases were observed in animals treated with TCA. In contrast, significant increases in [3H]thymidine were observed in the livers of both DCA- and TCA-treated animals after 5 days of treatment. This effect remained apparent with TCA after 14 days of treatment. These data support the hypothesis that the tumorigenic effect of DCA is strongly influenced by necrosis and reparative hyperplasia. On the other hand, the carcinogenic effects of TCA appear to be more closely associated with [3H]thymidine incorporation that can be separated from cell division, suggesting an elevated rate of repair synthesis of DNA. Thus the carcinogenic effects of TCA (and perhaps lower doses of DCA) may involve damage to DNA.     

Evaluation of the Role of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor α (PPARα in Mouse Liver Tumor Induction by Trichloroethylene and Metabolites

Trichloroethylene (TCE) is an industrial solvent and a widespread environmental contaminant. Induction of liver cancer in mice by TCE is thought to be mediated by two metabolites, dichloroacetate (DCA) and trichloroacetate (TCA), both of which are themselves mouse liver carcinogens. TCE, TCA, and DCA are relatively weak peroxisome proliferators (PP), a group of rodent hepatocarcinogens that activate a nuclear receptor, PP-activated receptor α (PPARα. The objective of this review is to assess the weight of evidence (WOE) that PPARα is or is not mechanistically involved in mouse liver tumor induction by TCE and metabolites. Based on similarities of TCE and TCA to typical PP, including dose-response characteristics showing PPARα-dependent responses coincident with liver tumor induction and abolishment of TCE and TCA effects in PPARα-null mice, the WOE supports the hypothesis that PPARα plays a dominant role in TCE- and TCA-induced hepatocarcinogenesis. Data indicates that the MOA for DCA tumor induction is PPARα-independent. Uncertainties remain regarding the genesis of the TCE-induced tumors. In contrast to the TCA-induced tumors, which have molecular features similar to those induced by typical PP, there is evidence, albeit weak, that TCE tumors arise by a mode of action (MOA) different from that of TCA tumors, based largely on dissimilarities in molecular markers found in TCE versus TCA-induced tumors. In summary, the WOE indicates that TCA-induced liver tumors arise by a PPARα-dependent MOA. Although the TCE MOA is likely dominated by a PPARα-dependent contribution from TCA, the contribution of a PPARα-independent MOA from DCA cannot be ruled out.     

Increased expression of c-myc and c-Ha-ras in dichloroacetate and trichloroacetate-induced liver tumors in B6C3F1 mice

The expression of c-myc and c-H-ras in hyperplastic nodules and hepatocellular carcinomas induced in male B6C3F1 mice after chronic administration of dichloroacetate (DCA) and trichloroacetate (TCA) was studied using in situ hybridization. Expression of c-myc and c-H-ras mRNA was increased in both nodules and carcinomas relative to surrounding tissue and tissues obtained from control animals. Myc expression was similar in hyperplastic nodules and carcinomas induced by DCA, but was significantly higher in TCA-induced carcinomas than in hyperplastic nodules and carcinomas produced by DCA. In carcinomas from animals whose TCA treatment was suspended at 37 weeks, c-myc expression remained high relative to control and surrounding liver tissue at 52 weeks. In contrast, the expression of c-H-ras was consistently elevated in carcinomas from both treatments relative to hyperplastic nodules and non-tumor tissue. Within carcinomas from both treatments, focal areas could be located which expressed even higher levels of c-myc. This heterogeneity was not observed in carcinomas hybridized to c-H-ras-probes. These data suggest that elevated expression of c-H-ras and c-myc might play an important role in the development of hepatic tumors in B6C3F1 mice. Elevated expression of c-H-ras was closely associated with malignancy. Increased c-myc expression does not seem necessary for progression to the malignant state. On the other hand, the increased expression of c-myc appears related to the earlier progression of TCA-induced tumors to the malignant state.     

Carcinogenic Activity of Dichloroacetic Acid and Trichloroacetic Acid in the Liver of Female B6C3F1 Mice

The concentration-response relationships for the hepatocarcin-ogenicactivity of dichloroacetic acid² (DCA) and trichloroacetic acid(TCA), two contaminants of finished drinking water, were determinedin female B6C3F1 mice. Dichloroacetic acid or trichloroaceticacid at 2.0, 6.67, or 20.0 mmol/liter was administered to themice in the drinking water starting at 7 to 8 weeks of age anduntil sacrifice after 360 or 576 days of exposure. The relationshipsof the yield of foci of altered hepatocytes, hepatocellularadenomas, and hepatocellular carcinomas to the concentrationof DCA and TCA in the water were best described by second-orderand linear regressions, respectively. The liver-to-body weightratio increased linearly for both DCA and TCA, as did the vacuolizationof the liver induced by DCA. The foci of altered hepatocytesand tumors in the animals treated with DCA were predominantlyeosinophilic and contained glutathione S-transferase- (GST-,over 80% of the lesions), while the tumors induced by TCA werepredominantly basophilic and lacked GST-, including all 11 hepatocellularcarcinomas. Therefore, the carcinogenic activity of DCA andTCA appeared to differ both with respect to their dose-responserelationship and to the characteristics of precancerous lesionsand tumors.