Immunohistochemical labelling for prostate–specific antigen in breast carcinomas

Immunohistochemical detection of prostate–specific antigen (PSA) is an aid in determining the prostatic origin of metastatic cells. However, small amounts of PSA have also been found in non–prostatic tissues and tumors, for example in some breast carcinomas, by highly sensitive immunofluorometric methods, but also by immunohistochemistry. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence and prognostic value of histologically confirmed PSA immunoreactivity in breast carcinoma.Sections of formalin–fixed, paraffin–embedded samples from 171 breast carcinomas were immunostained for PSA. The staining results were compared with the mitotic activity, tumor size, histological grade, steroid receptors and follow–up data. For analysis the material was divided into subgroups according to the patients' age (pre- and postmenopausal). PSA was found by immunohistochemistry in 54 (32) breast carcinomas. In survival analysis of the whole patient material PSA positivity did not show prognostic value. Among premenopausal patients concomitant estrogen receptor and PSA–negativity proved to be associated with high risk of breast cancer death (RR 6.2), also after adjustment for tumor size, histological grade, and axillary lymph node status. Among postmenopausal patients PSA positivity was associated with progesterone receptor positivity and high differentiation but not with age, nodal status, or mitotic activity. PSA can be detected by immunohistochemistry in a considerable number of breast carcinomas. PSA immunoreactivity alone does not seem to have any value as general prognosticator of breast carcinoma patients. However, concomitant absence of PSA and estrogen receptors was an indicator of unfavourable prognosis among premenopausal patients.     

Cancer–testis antigen expression in triple-negative breast cancer

Background: Cancer–testis (CT) antigens, frequently expressed in human germline cells but not in somatic tissues, may become aberrantly reexpressed in different cancer types. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of CT antigens in breast cancer.Patients and methods: A total of 100 selected invasive breast cancers, including 50 estrogen receptor (ER) positive/HER2 negative and 50 triple negative (TN), were examined for NY-ESO-1 and MAGE-A expression by immunohistochemistry.Results: A significantly higher expression of MAGE-A and NY-ESO-1 was detected in TN breast cancers compared with ER-positive tumors (P = 0.04). MAGE-A expression was detected in 13 (26%) TN cancers compared with 5 (10%) ER-positive tumors (P = 0.07). NY-ESO-1 expression was confirmed in nine (18%) TN tumor samples compared with two (4%) ER-positive tumors.Conclusions: MAGE-A and NY-ESO-1 CT antigens are expressed in a substantial proportion of TN breast cancers. Because of the limited therapeutic options for this group of patients, CT antigen-based vaccines might prove to be useful for patients with this phenotype of breast cancer.     

Prostate specific antigen — a new constituent of breast cyst fluid

Summary We demonstrate for the first time that prostate specific antigen (PSA) is a component of breast cyst fluid. At the cutoff level of 0.01 or 0.03 µg/L of PSA, 64% or 43% of cyst fluids are positive for PSA, respectively. PSA in cyst fluid, as characterized by high performance liquid chromatography, exists in almost equal concentrations as free PSA, with a molecular weight of 33 KDa, and as PSA bound to ₁-antichymotrypsin, with a molecular weight of 100 KDa. PSA presence was also characterized in cyst fluid by Western blot analysis. These data suggest that PSA is a frequent component of breast cyst fluid. More studies are needed to establish the role of this serine protease in normal breast, gross breast cystic disease, and breast cancer.     

Is screening for prostate cancer with prostate specific antigen an appropriate public health measure?

Screening and treatment for prostate cancer is controversial. In the absence of randomized trials, several prominent medical organizations in the United States and Europe have formulated policies that range from enthusiastic support to significant skepticism concerning the efficacy of screening and subsequent treatment for prostate cancer. Sharp rises in the incidence of prostate cancer have occurred whenever PSA testing has been introduced on a wide scale. Unfortunately, it is unclear whether declines in prostate cancer mortality can be attributed to PSA testing. Other explanations include the early use of anti-androgen therapy or changes in environmental factors such as diet. Repeated testing for serum PSA has produced significant shifts in the types of cases being identified and has raised the possibility of significant over-diagnosis of this disease. The European screening trial and the PLCO trial in the US will hopefully provide some insights into the value of population-based testing.     

Does resection of an intact breast primary improve survival in metastatic breast cancer?

The recommended primary treatment approach for women with metastatic breast cancer and an intact primary tumor is the use of systemic therapy. Local therapy of the primary tumor is recommended only for palliation of symptoms. However, a series of retrospective studies examining practice patterns for this problem show that about half the women presenting with de novo metastatic disease undergo resection of the primary tumor, and suggest that women so treated survive longer than those who do not undergo resection of the intact primary. In analyses that adjust for tumor burden (number of metastatic sites), types of metastases (visceral, nonvisceral), and the use of systemic therapy, the hazard ratio for death is reduced by 40% to 50% in women receiving surgical treatment of the primary tumor. The benefit of surgical treatment appears to be confined to women whose tumors were resected with free margins. However, these results may simply reflect a selection bias (ie, younger, healthier women with a smaller tumor burden are more likely to receive surgical treatment). In addition, the role of other locoregional therapy such as axillary dissection and radiotherapy is not addressed in these studies. In view of these data, the role of local therapy in women with stage IV breast cancer needs to be reevaluated, and local therapy plus systemic therapy should be compared to systemic therapy alone in a randomized trial.     

The clinical impact of breast scintigraphy acquired with a breast specific γ-camera (BSGC) in the diagnosis of breast cancer: incremental value versus mammography

We investigated the clinical impact of breast scintigraphy acquired with a breast specific γ-camera (BSGC) in the diagnosis of breast cancer (BC) and assessed its incremental value over mammography (Mx). A consecutive series of 467 patients underwent BSGC scintigraphy for different indications: suspicious lesions on physical examination and/or on US/MRI negative at Mx (BI-RADS 1 or 3), characterization of lesions suspicious at Mx (BI-RADS 4), preoperative staging in lesions highly suggestive of malignancy at Mx (BI-RADS 5). Definitive histopathological findings were obtained in all cases after scintigraphy: 420/467 patients had BC, while 47/467 patients had benign lesions. The scintigraphic data were correlated to Mx BI-RADS category findings and to histology. The incremental value of scintigraphy over Mx was calculated. Scintigraphy was true-positive in 97.1% BC patients, detecting 96.2% of overall tumor foci, including 91.5% of carcinomas ≤10 mm, and it was true-negative in 85.1% of patients with benign lesions. Scintigraphy gave an additional value over Mx in 141/467 cases (30.2%). In particular, scintigraphy ascertained BC missed at Mx in 31 patients with BI-RADS 1 or 3, including 26 patients with heterogeneously/high dense breast (19/26 with tumors ≤10 mm) and detected additional clinically occult ipsilateral or controlateral tumor foci (all <10 mm) or the in situ component sited around invasive tumors in 77 BC patients with BI-RADS 4 or 5, changing surgical management in 18.2% of these cases; moreover, scintigraphy ruled out malignancy in 33 patients with BI-RADS 4. BSGC scintigraphy proved a highly sensitive diagnostic tool, even in small size carcinoma detection, while maintaining a high specificity. The procedure increased both the sensitivity of Mx, especially in dense breast and in multifocal/multicentric disease, and the specificity as well as it better defined local tumor extension, thus guiding the surgeon to a more appropriate surgical treatment.     

Is obesity an independent prognosis factor in woman breast cancer?

Background Breast cancer and obesity represent important public health issues in most western countries. A number of studies found a negative prognosis effect of obesity or excess of weight in woman breast cancer. However, to date, this issue remains controversial. The objectives of this study were to confirm the prognosis role of obesity on a large cohort of patients and to investigate a potential independent effect. Materials and methods We constituted a cohort of 14,709 patients who were recruited and treated at the Curie Institute (Paris) from 1981 to 1999. These patients were followed prospectively for a first unilateral invasive breast cancer without distant metastasis. Obesity was defined by a Body Mass Index (BMI) above 30 kg/m(2) according to the World Health Organization recommendations. Results Obese patients (8%) presented more extended tumors at diagnosis time suggesting a delayed breast cancer diagnosis. However, obesity appeared as a negative prognosis factor for several events in respectively univariate and multivariate survival analysis: metastasis recurrence (HR = 1.32[1.19-1.48]; HR = 1.12[1.00-1.26]), disease free interval (1.20[1.08-1.32]; 1.10[0.99-1.22]), overall survival (1.43[1.28-1.60]; 1.12[0.99-1.25]) and second primary cancer outcome (1.57[1.19-2.07]; 1.43[1.09-1.89]). Even if obese patients presented more advanced tumors at diagnosis time, multivariate analysis showed that there was a relevant independent effect. Other BMI codings, distinguishing overweight patients or using BMI as a continuous variable, showed a consistent correlation between BMI's value and prognosis effect. Interaction analysis revealed a more important obesity effect in the presence of tumor estrogen receptors and among limited extent tumors. Conclusions This survey confirms the prognosis role of obesity on one of the largest cohort by investigating several prognosis events. While independent obesity effect linked to hormonal disorders appeared consistent as obesity's mechanism, we stress that obesity prognosis effect was also related to breast cancer presentation at diagnosis time.     

Tissue inhibitor of metalloprotease (TIMP)‐1 and proliferative behaviour of clonal breast cancer cells

In the present paper, we have examined whether human tissue inhibitor of metalloprotease1 (hTIMP1) is able to exert a growth factorlike effect on two clonal cell lines (BC3A and BC61), isolated from a parental line of human breast carcinoma cells (8701BC), and endowed with different growth and invasive behaviour in vitro and in nude mouse. The data obtained indicate that only the more tumorigenic clonal cell line (BC61) is responsive to hTIMP1 treatment by increasing its proliferative rate in a dosedependent manner. It was also found that BC61 cells selectively express a transmembrane protein of about 80kDa able to bind hTIMP1 in vitro and in vivo with high affinity (K_d of 0.07 ± 0.004 nM), and that treatment of BC61 cells with a proliferationpromoting concentration of hTIMP1 is able to stimulate tyrosinetargeted phosphorylation. The cumulative results obtained strongly support the hypothesis that hTIMP1, classically regarded as a collagenase inhibitor, may be a crucial element of the extracellular signalling network during breast cancer development by controlling cell growth phenotype in autocrine and paracrine manner, and that intratumoural heterogeneity for the biological response to TIMP1 may exist within the composite cell population of the primary tumour site.     

Associations of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D with overall and breast cancer–specific mortality in a multiethnic cohort of breast cancer survivors

Purpose

Despite limited evidence on the association of vitamin D with outcomes in breast cancer survivors, some clinicians advise breast cancer patients to use vitamin D supplements. More evidence is needed to inform these recommendations.

Methods

In the Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle study, we examined associations of post-treatment serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) on overall and breast cancer–specific mortality in 585 breast cancer survivors from western Washington State, New Mexico, and Los Angeles County. 25(OH)D was measured in stored blood collected 2 years post-enrollment. Outcomes were ascertained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries and medical records. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to assess associations of serum 25(OH)D with overall and breast cancer–specific mortality.

Results

After a median follow-up of 9.2 years; 110 women died, including 48 from breast cancer. Standard cut points classified 211 (31.6 %) women as serum 25(OH)D deficient (<20 ng/mL), 189 (32.2 %) as insufficient (20–30 ng/mL), and 185 (36.2 %) as sufficient (>30 ng/mL). Compared to women with deficient 25(OH)D, those in the sufficient ranges had a decreased risk of overall mortality (age-adjusted HR = 0.58; 95 % CI 0.36–0.96); however, multivariate adjustments attenuated the association (HR = 0.90; 95 % CI 0.50–1.61). No association was found between serum 25(OH)D and breast cancer–specific mortality (sufficient: HR = 1.21; 95 % CI 0.52–2.80) in multivariate models.

Conclusion

In this breast cancer cohort, higher serum 25(OH)D may be associated with improved survival, but results were not statistically significant and must be interpreted with caution. The potential prognostic effect of vitamin D from diet, supplements, or both should be evaluated in future larger studies with additional endpoints from breast cancer patients.     

Role of capecitabine (Xeloda®) in breast cancer

One rationale for the development of new treatment strategies for advanced breast cancer is to provide targeted antineoplastic therapy, while at the same time improving the quality of life of patients. One such drug, capecitabine (Xeloda^®), is an oral fluoropyrimidine 5-fluorouracil carbamate. Capecitabine is converted to 5-fluorouracil primarily in cancer tissue and it has been demonstrated to combine ease of administration, a manageable toxicity profile and potent antineoplastic activity. Capecitabine is widely used in metastatic breast cancer and offers symptom palliation and in combination with docetaxel (Taxotere^®) improved survival compared with docetaxel alone. Its toxicity profile includes hand–foot syndrome and stomatitis and diarrhea, whereas its hematologic side effects are mild. Capecitabine has been evaluated as a single agent in women with advanced breast cancer where it offers an overall response rate of 20–30%. Capecitabine is synergistic with other chemotherapeutic agents, such as the taxanes, where it increases the response rate to over 40%. This review will place the available data on the use of capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer as a single agent or as part of a combination regime in context.     

Tissue and soluble biomarkers in breast cancer and their applications: ready to use?

Breast cancer therapies are in continuous evolution: From surgery to hormonal therapy, from classical and new combined chemotherapies to emerging targeted agents of recent introduction to the clinic. The attempt to personalize the best treatment for each patient is driven by efficacy and safety parameters and tumor biology investigations of markers for aggressiveness and response to treatment. The plethora of targeted therapies has provided momentum for the quest to better understand not only target mechanisms of action, but also tumor behavior. Moreover, how to monitor response to these agents is crucial today to achieve better resource-sharing and to find cheaper, less invasive, and standardized detection techniques for clinically validated biomarkers. In this report, we briefly summarize data on the major tissue and soluble biomarkers focusing on their actual use in daily practice, as well as their emerging role and possible future applications in breast cancer treatment.     

Diverse prognosis in metastatic breast cancer: Who should be offered alternative initial therapies?

Introduction Physicians have been using hormonal manipulation to treat advanced breast cancer for almost a century. Surgical ablation of the ovaries, adrenals, and pituitary glands has achieved remarkable tumor regression in sensitive patients. Alternatively, large doses of estrogens, progestins, and androgens have achieved similar results. More recently, the emergence of new therapies, such as antiestrogens, LHRH agonists, and chemical blockade of adrenal steroid biosynthesis offer additional choices. Within limits, all of these therapies are equally effective in sensitive patients. The trend at the present time is to select a therapy that will produce a good response with minimal toxicity. Here the participating physicians will discuss one such therapy — Megace (megestrol acetate). They will consider the role of Megace in the treatment of advanced breast cancer along with issues such as toxicity, dose response, etc.A series of teleconferences has been organized under the auspices of Bristol-Myers to address several major current questions in oncology. A panel of recognized experts with a moderator has been assembled to discuss each question, and we are reporting a number of these discussions in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. This is reprinted from Oncology Viewpoints, courtesy of Bristol-Myers Oncology Division, Evansville IN 47721, USA.     

Telomerase as a useful target in cancer fighting—the breast cancer case

Telomerase was initially considered as a relevant factor distinguishing cancer from normal cells. During detailed studies, it appeared that its expression and activity is not only limited to cancer cells however, but in this particular cells, the telomerase is much more abundant. Thus, it has become a very promising target for an anticancer therapy. It was revealed in many studies that regulation of telomerase is a multifactorial process in mammalian cells, involving regulation of expression of telomerase subunits coding genes, post-translational protein–protein interactions, and protein phosphorylation. Numerous proto-oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes are engaged in this mechanism, and the complexity of telomerase control is studied in the context of tumor development as well as aging. Additionally, since numerous studies reveal a correlation between short telomeres and increased genome instability or cell mortality, the telomerase control appears to be one of the crucial factors to study in order to improve the cancer diagnostics and therapy or prevention. Interestingly, almost 100 % of adenocarcinoma, including breast cancer cells, expresses telomerase which makes it a good target for telomerase-related therapy. Additionally, telomerase is also supposed to be associated with drug resistance. Thus, targeting the enzyme might result in attenuation of this phenomenon. Moreover, since stem cells existence was reported, it must be considered whether targeting telomerase can bring some serious side effects and result in stem cells viability or their regenerative potential decrease. Thus, we review some molecular mechanisms engaged in therapy based on targeting telomerase in breast cancer cells.     

New approaches in the therapy of breast cancer — introduction

Summary Interaction of academic medical research centers with the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries is essential for progress in exploring new avenues for therapy of breast cancer. This special issue of Breast Cancer Research and Treatment reports the proceedings of a conference held by the Lombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown University, on progress toward development of new therapies for breast cancer. These chapters are organized to present the following topics: immunotherapy, tumor growth pathways and their inhibition, and tumor-host interaction pathways and their inhibition.The symposium "New Approaches in the Therapy of Breast Cancer" was held at Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC, October 1994, and was generously supported by an education grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb.     

Bevacizumab in advanced breast cancer: an opportunity as second-line therapy?

Bevacizumab is approved for use as first-line therapy in advanced breast cancer according to pivotal ECOG 2,100 trial. Recently, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) voted unanimously against this licensed indication from the product’s labeling. This is because 2 other trials have been conducted (AVADO and RIBBON-1) and both have shown a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival, although of a much smaller magnitude than was seen in E2100 study. After meta-analysing 2-s-line randomized bevacizumab trials that addressed a little bit different populations (a pure second-line population in RIBBON2 and an heavily pretreated [1–2 previous lines] population in Miller trial), we have discovered that overall response rate (relative risk 1.63; 95% CI 1.02–2.62; P = 0.04) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.85; 95% CI 0.73–0.98; P = 0.03) were significantly increased with the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy. Despite both trials, the results are not significant in terms of duration of responses; however, bevacizumab appears not to increase the toxicity of chemotherapy (in particular febrile neutropenia). In conclusion, bevacizumab label in breast cancer could be reconsidered at least for second-line setting where a standard option does not exist, and a real difference in OS is unproven and unnecessary with any regimen in randomized trials.     

Cost-effectiveness analysis of docetaxel (Taxotere®) vs. 5-fluorouracil in combined therapy in the initial phases of breast cancer

Introduction  The randomised controlled trial BCIRG001 has recently demonstrated that docetaxel in combination with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (TAC) has better efficacy than the standard treatment (FAC, i.e., 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide) in the adjuvant treatment of patients with node-positive breast cancer. The cost-effectiveness of TAC vs. FAC in the Spanish setting is analysed. Patients and methods  Clinical outcomes from trial BCIRG001 were combined with Spanish costs and long-term efficacy of FAC and TAC extrapolated up to 5 years by means of a Markov model. Results are shown as cost per life year gained (C/LYG) and cost per quality-adjusted life year (C/QALY). Costs and effects were discounted at a rate of 3%. Results  Mean survival was 17.8 and 16.5 years for TAC and FAC, with total costs of €14,611 and €11,586, respectively. The results of the cost-effectiveness analysis showed that TAC achieves a C/LYG and a C/QALY of only €2345 and €2631, respectively. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the results. Conclusions  Combined therapy based on docetaxel (TAC) is not only an effective option, but also presents a favourable cost-effectiveness ratio, clearly below the Spanish efficiency threshold in all the scenarios considered.