Screening for asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis: Duplex criteria for discriminating 60% to 99% stenosis

Purpose: The Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS) showed that carotid endarterectomy reduces stroke risk in symptom-free patients with 60% or greater internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. This will surely lead to the performance of an increased number of screening duplex examinations. Assuming that positive study results will lead to arteriography or endarterectomy and keeping in mind the modest benefit for prophylactic endarterectomy demonstrated by ACAS (absolute risk reduction for ipsilateral stroke of 5.8% at 5 years), duplex criteria for 60% or greater ICA stenosis must have high positive predictive values (PPV). Determining criteria for 60% or greater stenosis, which emphasized high accuracy and PPV, forms the basis for this study.Methods: Stenoses detected by angiography in 352 ICAs were blindly compared with those detected by duplex scanning. Duplex criteria were determined for highest overall accuracy in detection of 60% or greater ICA stenosis and for 95% or greater PPV.Results: Maximal accuracy for detection of 60% or greater stenosis was 90%. This was achieved by the combination of a peak systolic velocity of 260 cm/sec or greater and an end diastolic velocity of 70 cm/sec or greater (sensitivity 84%, specificity 94%, PPV 92%). The 95% PPV for 60% or greater stenosis results from combining peak systolic velocity of 290 cm/sec or greater and end diastolic velocity of 80 cm/sec or greater.Conclusions: With use of these criteria duplex scanning accurately detects with high PPVs the threshold level of ICA stenosis defined in ACAS as receiving stroke reduction benefit from prophylactic carotid endarterectomy. These criteria should be useful for carotid artery screening and minimizing unneeded intervention. (J VASC SURG 1995;21:989-94.)     

Carotid duplex criteria for a 60% or greater angiographic stenosis: Variation according to equipment

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the carotid duplex criteria for a ≥60% angiographic internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis and the degree of variation among duplex scanners.Methods: Carotid duplex criteria for a ≥60% angiographic stenosis were evaluated in two ICAVL-accredited vascular laboratories with different brands of duplex scanners (Siemens-Quantum and Diasonics in Laboratory A, ATL and Diasonics in Laboratory B). Analysis was performed for 360 carotid bifurcations in 180 consecutive patients who had concurrent angiographic and duplex evaluation. Blinded angiogram evaluation was performed with precision electronic calipers on magnified views, with stenosis calculated by criteria of the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Duplex data included internal carotid artery peak systolic velocity (ICA PSV), ICA end-diastolic velocity, and the ratio of ICA PSV to common carotid artery (CCA) PSV (ICA/CCA ratio).Results: The most accurate determination of a ≥60% ICA stenosis was obtained with ICA/CCA ratio and ICA PSV, but the optimal threshold differed for all four scanners. The optimal ICA/CCA ratio varied from 2.6 to 3.3, and the optimal ICA PSV varied from 190 to 240 cm/sec. All four scanners produced criteria that gave a positive predictive value >90% while maintaining accuracy at ≥90%. Logarithmic transformation of duplex variables created a linear relationship between duplex values and angiographic stenosis, allowing statistical evaluation of scanner operating characteristics by linear regression analysis and analysis of covariance. This analysis revealed that the mathematic equation relating duplex values with angiographic percent stenosis was statistically different for one of the four scanners ( p < 0.05). Scanner differences did not appear to be due to technologists, because the regression lines were nearly identical for the two Diasonics scanners despite use by different technologists. Ignoring the significant difference in operating characteristics for one of the four scanners would result in a mean error for predicting a 60% stenosis of 14% to 18% (equating a 46% or 78% stenosis with a 60% stenosis).Conclusions: We conclude that the correlation of duplex data with angiographic percent stenosis and the duplex criteria for a ≥60% stenosis are machine-specific. Regression analysis can determine whether apparent differences are due to chance or significant differences in scanner characteristics. Future studies should include regression analysis according to equipment type. (J Vasc Surg 1996;24:856-64.)     

Color-flow duplex scanning of carotid arteries: New velocity criteria based on receiver operator characteristic analysis for threshold stenoses used in the symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid trials

Purpose: Duplex scanning has become the standard for noninvasive evaluation of carotid arteries. However, current ultrasound criteria for internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (16% to 49%, 50% to 79%, 80% to 99%) may not be applicable to the categories (30% to 49%, 50% to 69%, 70% to 99%) used in ongoing symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy trials. This study was undertaken to determine new velocity criteria consistent with these categories.Methods: From January 1, 1989 through October 30, 1992, 5871 color-flow duplex scans were obtained in our laboratories. After inadequate arteriograms and patients with a contralateral ICA occlusion were excluded, 770 peak systolic velocity (PSV) and 229 end-diastolic velocity (EDV) measurements were available for comparison with arteriography. ICA PSV and EDV were subjected to receiver operator characteristic curve analysis to determine optimum criteria for identifying stenoses of 30%, 50%, and 70%.Results: For 70% to 99% carotid artery stenosis, PSV greater than 130 plus EDV greater than 100 provided the best sensitivity (81%), specificity (98%), positive predictive value (89%), negative predictive value (96%), and overall accuracy (95%). For 50% to 69% stenosis, a PSV greater than 130 and EDV of 100 or less cm/sec proved to be the best combination: sensitivity (92%), specificity (97%), positive predictive value (93%), negative predictive value (99%), and accuracy (97%). Stenoses in the 30% to 49% range were less accurately identified.Conclusion: These redefined criteria may prove useful for analyzing duplex ultrasound velocity data in reference to the classification of ICA stenosis used in recent clinical trials of the safety and efficacy of carotid endarterectomy. (J VASC SURG 1994;19:818-28.)     

Use of limited color-flow duplex for a carotid screening project.

BACKGROUND: Although the efficacy of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis has been established, no cost-effective approach for identification of these patients has yet been devised. The purpose of this study was to develop a limited carotid duplex screening examination to be utilized for the detection of asymptomatic carotid stenoses. METHODS: Carotid screening examinations employed rapid identification of the carotid bifurcation using color-flow duplex imaging and an immediate Doppler-derived velocity of the segment of the internal carotid artery with the most turbulent flow. Complete examinations were then finished using well-established protocols in our accredited vascular laboratory. A total of 512 patients were referred for complete studies based upon standard indications. Criteria for at least a 50% internal carotid artery stenosis on the complete examination was defined as a peak systolic velocity (PSV) of at least 125 cm/sec. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were then constructed to identify the optimal screening velocity criteria as compared with the final results on the complete examination. RESULTS: Five screening examinations were technically limited yielding a total of 507 patients with 1,014 carotid arteries available for analysis. Comparison of screening examinations versus complete examinations for a PSV of 125 cm/sec yielded sensitivity 86%, specificity 98%, positive predictive value (PPV) 95%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) 93%. ROC analysis identified a "cut point" of 115 cm/sec on the screening examinations to achieve sensitivity 91%, specificity 95%, PPV 89%, and NPV 96%. Time to perform screening examinations averaged 3.2 minutes per patient. Three patients had common carotid lesions not identified on the limited internal carotid screening examinations. CONCLUSIONS: Screening carotid examinations are a rapid, reliable, and relatively inexpensive method for detection of patients with asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis. Limited screening examinations should be developed in each vascular laboratory and utilized in high-risk patients.     

Utility of routine carotid duplex screening in patients who have claudication

Purpose: The recently published Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS) demonstrated the benefit of performing carotid endarterectomy in selected asymptomatic patients who have >60% carotid stenoses. It therefore becomes clinically important to identify the subgroups of patients who have a sufficiently high incidence of high-grade carotid stenosis to warrant routine carotid duplex screening.Methods: To determine the incidence of asymptomatic carotid disease in patients who had a chief complaint of claudication, we evaluated 188 patients who had claudication and no history of cerebrovascular symptoms. After a complete history was taken and a physical examination performed, patients underwent standard lower-extremity noninvasive vascular laboratory studies and carotid duplex scanning. Carotid duplex findings were interpreted by the Strandness criteria. Associated atherosclerotic risk factors were assessed (patient age, male sex, diabetes, hypertension, smoking history, lipid levels, history of coronary artery disease, coronary or vascular surgery, and family history of cerebrovascular disease). Presence of a carotid bruit was also noted. Univariate analysis, logistic regression, and odds ratios were performed to identify subgroups of patients that had an increased incidence of significant carotid disease.Results: Of the 188 patients with claudication who were screened, 8% had an internal carotid artery stenosis of 16% to 49%, 21.8% had a stenosis that exceeded 50%, and 2.7% had an occluded internal carotid artery. The presence of a carotid bruit on physical examination was predictive of a ≥50% internal carotid artery stenosis (p = 0.027). The ankle-brachial index was highly predictive of the presence of carotid stenoses in an inverse relationship (p = 0.001). Patient age approached significance (p = 0.143). Patients older than 65 years of age who had claudication, an ankle-brachial index less than 0.7, and a carotid bruit had a 45% incidence of significant carotid disease. The atherosclerotic risk factors of male sex, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking history, coronary history, previous coronary or vascular surgical history, and family history were not predictive of the presence of a >50% carotid stenosis.Conclusions: In patients who seek medical attention with the chief complaint of claudication and who have no cerebrovascular symptoms, there is a 24.5% incidence of a >50% internal carotid artery stenosis or occlusion on duplex examination. Select subsets of these patients have upwards of a 45% incidence of significant asymptomatic carotid disease. All patients who seek medical attention with claudication should therefore undergo routine carotid duplex screening to detect asymptomatic high-grade stenosis. (J Vasc Surg 1996;24:572-9.)     

Gender differences in blood velocities across carotid stenoses

OBJECTIVES: Carotid duplex scanning is the standard test for documenting carotid disease. Carotid endarterectomy effectively reduces stroke in selected patients with carotid artery disease. Data from large national randomized trials suggest that the benefits of CEA may be gender dependent. Because many diagnoses are made and treatment is based on the results of carotid duplex ultrasound scanning alone, it is important to determine whether different diagnostic thresholds should be used in men and women. The purpose of this study was 2-fold: to examine whether there is an overall gender difference in carotid velocity at similar arteriographic stenoses, and to determine whether there are significant differences at clinically relevant thresholds of disease. METHODS: A database of 938 carotid arteriogram entries was established prospectively, with accompanying measurements of peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end-diastolic velocity (EDV). The percent of internal carotid artery stenosis seen on arteriograms was calculated according to criteria from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Analyses were made in 536 carotid arteries in men and 402 carotid arteries in women. In addition, the single most diseased artery per patient was analyzed by gender. PSV and EDV were averaged for data subsets according to 10% intervals of internal carotid artery stenoses. Velocity for each interval was compared between men and women with the Student t test. Receiver operator characteristic curves were developed to define optimal duplex criteria for 60% and 70% stenosis. RESULTS: For all intervals, PSV and EDV averaged 9% and 6% higher, respectively, in women than in men. Significant gender differences existed between PSV and EDV for 60% and 70% stenosis (P = .03). When a single vessel per patient was analyzed these observations persisted, but lost significance for PSV at 60% stenosis (P = .18). Receiver operator characteristic curves at 90% sensitivity demonstrated that optimal PSV for 60% stenosis was 160 cm/s and 180 cm/s, and for 70% stenosis was 185 cm/s and 202 cm/s, in male and female patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Women have higher carotid blood flow velocity than men do. Gender differences exist, and are notably different at clinically relevant thresholds for intervention. These data indicate that different criteria should be used for interpreting carotid velocity profiles in women than in men, and have potentially important implications for patient care.     

Carotid surgery without arteriography: Noninvasive selection of patients

All carotid noninvasive studies at our institution comprised of duplex scanning, spectral frequency analysis, and ocular-pneumoplethysmography-Gee supraorbital Doppler assessments from 1985–1987 were reviewed. Forty symptomatic and 104 asymptomatic internal carotid arteries, concomitantly studied noninvasively and arteriographically, were identified. All studies were rereviewed prospectively and in blinded fashion. Utilizing peak frequency—internal carotid artery >10 mHz and carotid index (Pf-ICA)/PF-common carotid) >5 as criteria for surgery, 39/40 symptomatic internal carotid arteries were considered appropriate for carotid endarterectomy by noninvasive study. All of these internal carotid arteries had arteriographic confirmation of >50% internal carotid artery stenosis; 22 of them met noninvasive criteria for surgery of peak systolic frequency-internal carotid artery 14 mHz, carotid index >7 and abnormal ocular-pneumoplethysmography-Gee supraorbital Doppler. All of these had arteriographic confirmation of >80% internal carotid artery stenosis. Eleven asymptomatic internal carotid arteries met spectral frequency criteria for carotid endarterectomy but had normal ocular-pneumoplethysomgraphy-Gee/supraorbital Doppler. Eight in this group had <80% stenosis on arteriographic exam. Carotid endarterectomy may be performed without prior arteriography, provided objective criteria are established in a reliable noninvasive lab and met by individual patients. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Vascular Society, Southhampton, Bermuda, May 5, 1989.     

Duplex Ultrasound Verified by Angiography in Patients with Severe Primary and Restenosis of Internal Carotid Artery

There are very limited data in the literature about the reliability of duplex ultrasound (DU) verified by angiography in patients with restenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) after carotid surgery compared with primary carotid artery stenosis patients. Our objective was to compare the reliability of DU verified by conventional angiography in the diagnosis of severe primary stenosis versus restenosis of ICA. One hundred thirty-four patients (238 arteries) were examined by both DU and angiography. Severe stenosis (>70%) was found in 47 primary stenotic arteries and in 70 restenotic arteries. Accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value were obtained for basic DU criteria after verification of ultrasound data by angiography. The best accuracy for detection of >70% stenosis by end diastolic velocity was found for the velocity of 70 cm/sec or more in both groups, but accuracy for the restenosis group was significantly higher (96.9% vs. 89.8%, p = 0.025). Additionally, specificity (p = 0.01) and PPV (p = 0.01) were significantly higher in the restenosis group. The best accuracy for detection of >70% stenosis by peak systolic velocity was found for the velocity of 220 cm/sec or more for restenoses and 200 cm/sec or more for primary stenoses. The accuracy of the ultrasound was significantly higher in the restenosis group (94.6% vs. 87%, p = 0.04), as were specificity (p = 0.01) and PPV (p = 0.02). The diagnosis of severe restenosis by DU is reliable and can be used for decision making regarding surgery or stenting without angiography. In patients with Doppler parameters pointing to borderline moderate/severe primary carotid stenosis and technically complicated cases, angiography in addition to sonography before surgery is recommended.     

Why do some patients with > 80% stenosis of the internal carotid artery not undergo surgery? A retrospective review

Background: Carotid endarterectomy is known to benefit both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with high‐grade internal carotid artery stenosis. Duplex scanning is the ‘gold standard’ for non‐invasive preoperative investigation of carotid artery stenosis. The aim of the present study was to analyse the indications for duplex scanning and to identify other factors that influenced the management of patients with high‐grade stenosis who did not undergo carotid endarterectomy. Methods: A total of 271 patients was observed to have > 80% stenosis of the internal carotid artery on duplex scanning during the period of review. Of these patients, 85 did not undergo carotid endarterectomy. The vascular laboratory database and hospital records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed. Results: The indications for requesting a carotid duplex scan in the 85 patients were transient ischaemic attack (22%), stroke (25%), symptomatic bruit (7%), asymptomatic bruit (12%), and stroke and symptomatic bruit combined (7%). Falls and preoperative carotid assessment prior to coronary surgery were the commonest indications in the remaining patients. The main risk factors were cardiac (68%), hypertension (60%), respiratory (21%), diabetes (25%), peripheral vascular disease (19%), neoplasm (16%) and renal disease (16%). Twenty‐five per cent of the patients were over 80 years of age. Conclusion: In the present study risk factors associated with increased perioperative morbidity and mortality were the commonest explanation for patients with high‐grade stenosis of the internal carotid artery not undergoing surgery. These patients would generally not meet the inclusion criteria for the major carotid endarterectomy trials.     

Outcome of moderate carotid artery stenosis in patients who are asymptomatic

Purpose: The incidence rate of disease progression and stroke after the diagnosis of a moderate (50% to 79%) carotid stenosis was determined by means of color-flow duplex scanning. Methods: During a 4-year period, 344 male veterans with moderate internal carotid artery stenoses, on one or both sides, were examined at regular intervals for a mean period of 25 months. Carotid color-flow scans were obtained semiannually. Clinical follow-up was performed to determine the incidence rate of amaurosis fugax, transient ischemic attacks, nonhemispheric symptoms, and strokes. Results: New neurologic symptoms developed in 75 patients (21.8%). Fifty-one (14.8%) had ipsilateral symptoms during follow-up: 18 amaurosis fugax (5.2%), 14 transient ischemic attacks (4%), 5 nonhemispheric symptoms (1.4%), and 14 strokes (4%). Twenty-four patients (6.9%) had contralateral symptoms: 20 strokes (5.8%) and 4 transient ischemic attacks (1.2%). Life-table analysis showed that the annual rate of ipsilateral neurologic events was 8.1%, and the annual rate of stroke was 2.1%. Seventy-five patients (22%) died in the follow-up period. Disease progression to 80% to 99% stenosis or occlusion occurred in 71 of 458 vessels (15.5%). The internal carotid arteries that showed evidence of disease progression had a significantly higher initial peak systolic velocity (251 vs 190 cm/s; P < .0001) and end diastolic velocity (74 vs 52 cm/s; P < 0.0001). Black patients and patients with ischemic heart disease were at a higher risk for disease progression. We could not identify any atherosclerotic risk factors that reliably predicted patients in whom future ipsilateral neurologic symptoms were more likely to develop. However, there was an increased risk of stroke associated with progression of disease. Conclusion: Patients who are asymptomatic and who have moderate carotid stenoses are at significant risk for neurologic symptoms and death, but have a relatively low incidence rate of ipsilateral events. The initial flow characteristics in the stenotic vessel are predictive of future disease progression, but they are not helpful in identifying patients in whom symptoms will develop. (J Vasc Surg 1999;29:217-27.)     

Karotisendarteriektomie vs. Karotisstent

Carotid stenosis is responsible for 15–20% of ischemic strokes in the adult population. Carotid endarterectomy is a procedure that has been shown to be superior to medical treatment in the prevention of stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis >70% stenosis according to NASCET criteria. Now randomised studies and meta-analysis reported short term safety and intermediate term efficacy of carotid endarterectomy vs. carotid artery stenting. The periprocedural risk of stroke was shown to be lower for carotid endarterectomy. In the intermediate term follow up, both treatments are comparable in stroke and death prevention. Restonis of carotid artery is significantly higher in the carotid stenting group. Patients age influences the number of primary outcome events in the carotid stenting group.     

Effect of carotid endarterectomy on the ophthalmic artery

Summary. Summary.   Background: To evaluate the effect of carotid endarterectomy on ophthalmic artery flow direction and peak systolic flow velocity, the authors examined the ophthalmic artery on 32 patients who had undergone carotid endarterectomy.   Methods: The 32 patients had more than 70% stenosis of the internal carotid artery at its origin on angiography. The ophthalmic artery ipsilateral to the carotid endarterectomy was evaluated by the ophthalmic artery color Doppler flow imaging before surgery and then at one week, one month, and three months after surgery.   Findings: (1) Before carotid endarterectomy: eight patients showed reversed ophthalmic artery direction. In the other 24 patients with antegrade ophthalmic artery flow direction, the average peak systolic flow velocity was 0.17±0.10 m/sec. (2) At one week after carotid endarterectomy: The reversed ophthalmic artery flow direction was resolved in each patient. The average peak systolic flow velocity in the patients with preoperative antegrade flow rose significantly to 0.28±0.10 m/sec (p<0.05). (3) At one month and three months after carotid endarterectomy: All patients showed the antegrade ophthalmic artery flow direction. The average peak systolic flow velocities showed no significant change compared to the value at one week after carotid endarterectomy. (4) During the followed up period, there was no patient showing worsening or recurrence of clinical symptoms including the visual symptoms.   Interpretation: Carotid endarterectomy brought about the correction of the reversed flow and an increase in the peak systolic flow velocity of the ipsilateral ophthalmic artery immediately after surgery.     

Validation of flow convergence region method in the assessment of carotid artery stenoses during color-flow duplex studies

PURPOSE: The flow convergence region (FCR) method (also known as the proximal isovelocity surface area method) is currently used in echocardiography to evaluate the flow through cardiac valves and septal defects. The FCR method is based on the characteristic alterations in flow dynamics that occur proximal to a stenotic orifice. Blood converges uniformly and radially towards an orifice that is small relative to the section of the vessel and forms concentric isovelocity hemispheric shells where velocity progressively increases and flow remains laminar. The purpose of the article is to validate the use of this principle in the detection and assessment of carotid stenoses in the course of color-flow duplex studies. METHODS: In this prospective study, 80 patients affected by unilateral or bilateral carotid artery stenoses were evaluated for the presence of the FCR from February 1997 to March 1999. The results were compared with digital subtraction angiography. RESULTS: Color-flow duplex diagnosis of carotid artery stenoses of 70% or more was confirmed in 100% of the carotid artery stenoses (40/40 patients) with angiography. The FCR was detected in 72.2% (13/18) of carotid arteries affected by stenoses greater than 80%, in 54.4% (12/22) of carotid arteries affected by stenoses 70% to 80%, and in 13.6% (6/44) of carotid arteries affected by stenoses 50% to 69% (P <.001). In 5% of cases (2/40 of stenoses) the FCR was the only detectable sign of carotid stenosis. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that a routine search for FCR in the course of color-flow duplex study of carotid arteries may further improve the reliability of this examination in the detection of carotid artery stenoses, particularly in the presence of heavily calcified lesions.     

The incidence of carotid in-stent stenosis is underestimated ≥50% or ≥80% and its clinical implications

BackgroundThe incidence of carotid in-stent stenosis has been reported to vary between 1% and 30%. Most published studies have short follow-up, which may lead to underestimation of the incidence of in-stent stenosis. This study analyzed the incidence of ≥50% and ≥80% in-stent stenosis using validated duplex ultrasound criteria and its clinical implications.MethodsThis is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 450 carotid artery stenting (CAS) procedures (February 6, 2001-December 19, 2016). All patients had postoperative carotid duplex ultrasound examination, which was repeated at 1 month, 6 months, and every 6 to 12 months thereafter. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate rates of freedom from ≥50% in-stent stenosis (internal carotid artery peak systolic velocity of ≥224 cm/s) and ≥80% in-stent stenosis (internal carotid artery peak systolic velocity of ≥325 cm/s), freedom from reintervention, and survival.ResultsThe mean age was 68.3 years, with a mean follow-up of 40.3 months. A total of 201 patients (45% [201/450]) had CAS for symptomatic disease. Primary CAS was done in 291 patients (65%); in the remaining 35%, CAS was done for postcarotid endarterectomy (CEA) stenosis. A total of 101 patients (23%) had ≥50% late carotid in-stent stenosis, and of these, 33 (7.4%) had ≥80% in-stent stenosis. Nineteen patients (4.3%) developed late transient ischemic attack and three (0.7%) late stroke. Twenty-three (5.2%) patients had late reintervention. Rates of freedom from ≥50% in-stent stenosis in the whole series were 85%, 79%, 75%, 72%, and 70% at 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years, respectively. The rates of freedom from ≥50% in-stent stenosis for primary CAS and CAS for post-CEA stenosis were not statistically significant (P = .540). The rates of freedom from ≥80% in-stent stenosis for the whole series were 96%, 95%, 93%, 90%, and 89% at 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years, respectively. The rates of freedom from ≥80% in-stent stenosis for primary CAS and CAS for post-CEA stenosis were also not statistically significant (P = .516). Rates of freedom from reintervention were 98%, 96%, 93%, 93%, and 91% at 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years, respectively, and there were no significant differences between primary CAS and CAS for post-CEA stenosis (P = .939). The overall late survival rates were 99%, 97%, 96%, 94%, and 91% at 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years.ConclusionsThe incidence of ≥50% in-stent stenosis is relatively high; however, the rates of ≥80% stenosis and late neurologic events are low. Longer follow-up of patients with ≥50% carotid in-stent stenosis may yield higher incidence of ≥80% stenosis.     

Sensitivity and specificity of color duplex ultrasound measurement in the estimation of internal carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Duplex ultrasound is widely used for the diagnosis of internal carotid artery stenosis. Standard duplex ultrasound criteria for the grading of internal carotid artery stenosis do not exist; thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the relation between the degree of internal carotid artery stenosis by duplex ultrasound criteria and degree of stenosis by angiography. METHODS: Data were gathered from Medline from January 1966 to January 2003, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, ACP Journal Club, UpToDate, reference lists, and authors' files. Inclusion criteria were the comparison of color duplex ultrasound results with angiography by the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial method; peer-reviewed publications, and >/=10 adults. RESULTS: Variables extracted included internal carotid artery peak systolic velocity, internal carotid artery end diastolic velocity, internal carotid artery/common carotid artery peak systolic velocity ratio, sensitivity and specificity of duplex ultrasound scanning for internal carotid artery stenosis by angiography. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) criteria were used to assess study quality. Sensitivity and specificity for duplex ultrasound criteria were combined as weighted means by using a random effects model. The threshold of peak systolic velocity >/=130 cm/s is associated with sensitivity of 98% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 97% to 100%) and specificity of 88% (95% CI, 76% to 100%) in the identification of angiographic stenosis of >/=50%. For the diagnosis of angiographic stenosis of >/=70%, a peak systolic velocity >/=200 cm/s has a sensitivity of 90% (95% CI, 84% to 94%) and a specificity of 94% (95% CI, 88% to 97%). For each duplex ultrasound threshold, measurement properties vary widely between laboratories, and the magnitude of the variation is clinically important. The heterogeneity observed in the measurement properties of duplex ultrasound may be caused by differences in patients, study design, equipment, techniques or training. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians need to be aware of the limitations of duplex ultrasound scanning when making management decisions.     

Can the NASCET technique for measuring carotid stenosis be reliably applied outside the trial?

Purpose: The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) and the Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Study (ACAS) both confirmed the effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy for preventing stroke in patients who have significant carotid stenosis. A uniform technique for measuring carotid stenosis from an arteriogram (% stenosis = [1 - minimum residual lumen/normal distal cervical internal carotid artery diameter] × 100) was used in both trials, with reproducibility internally validated. The reliability of this measurement when used outside the trials for defining carotid stenosis has not been validated. Imprecise calculation of carotid stenosis can result in a 50% overestimation of significant carotid disease and potential overuse of carotid surgery. This is a prospective study of the reliability of carotid stenosis measurements performed by practicing physicians of different specialties and different levels of clinical experience.Methods: Two vascular surgeons and two interventional radiologists (one resident and one staff member per specialty), blinded to results, calculated the percent stenosis from 219 consecutive arteriograms performed to evaluate extracranial carotid artery occlusive disease; 72 random films were reread by each individual. The interpretations were grouped as <60% or ≥60% stenosis (ACAS) and as <30%, 30% to 69%, and ≥70% stenosis (NASCET). Interobserver and intraobserver agreement were analyzed with the kappa statistic and Pearson correlation coefficients.Results: Interobserver reliability in categorizing carotid stenosis revealed excellent agreement for both ACAS (κ = 0.825 to 0.903) and NASCET groups (κ = 0.729 to 0.793). Interobserver correlation coefficients ranged from 0.91 to 0.95. Intraobserver agreement was also highly reproducible for both the ACAS (κ = 0.732 to 0.970) and NASCET categories (κ = 0.634 to 0.805). Intraobserver correlation coefficients ranged from 0.89 to 0.95.Conclusion: The NASCET technique for quantification of carotid stenosis can be easily learned by physicians and reliably implemented for appropriate identification of candidates for carotid endarterectomy. (J Vasc Surg 1996;24:449-56.)     

Experience in colour‐flow duplex carotid imaging for extracranial carotid stenosis

Carotid duplex scanning is a non‐invasive, cost‐effective method for the diagnosis of stability, progression or improvement of extracranial cerebral disease. It yields functional information that complements the anatomic information provided by angiography. It can localize the disease with B‐mode ultrasound and can determine the functional severity of the disease with spectral analysis and colour‐flow imaging. The diagnostic criteria are based on the peak systolic velocity and end diastolic velocity of the internal carotid artery. Carotid stenosis of 70% or greater is taken as significant. The texture and morphology of the plaque can be reported as either homogeneous, heterogeneous with ulceration or heterogeneous without ulceration. This distinction would not be detected readily by angiography. With a high degree of accuracy in identifying sig‐nificant stenoses in carotid arteries, duplex scanning can replace angiography prior to performing carotid endarterectomy.      

Is a single preoperative duplex scan sufficient for planning bilateral carotid endarterectomy?

PURPOSE: Duplex scanning is often the sole imaging study before carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Patients with bilateral severe internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis may be considered for bilateral CEA. High-grade ICA stenosis, however, may artifactually elevate velocity measurements used to quantify stenosis in the contralateral ICA. It is unknown whether ipsilateral CEA will influence duplex determination of the presence of a contralateral 60% to 99% ICA stenosis. This study was performed to determine whether a single preoperative duplex scan is sufficient to plan bilateral CEA. METHODS: Preoperative and early postoperative carotid duplex scans in patients with bilateral ICA stenosis who underwent unilateral CEA were reviewed. Changes in duplex scans that determined stenosis in the ICA contralateral to the CEA were analyzed. Previously validated criteria used to determine 60% to 99% ICA stenosis were a peak systolic velocity (PSV) of 260 cm/sec or more combined with an end diastolic velocity (EDV) of 70 cm/sec or more. RESULTS: Over an 8-year period, 460 patients underwent CEA; 107 patients (23.3%) had an asymptomatic 50% to 99% contralateral ICA stenosis by standard criteria (PSV, >125 cm/sec) and an early postoperative duplex scan examination. Of these 107 patients, 38 patients (35.5%) had duplex scan criteria for 60% to 99% contralateral ICA stenosis. In these 38 patients, there was a mean postoperative PSV decrease of 47.7 cm/sec (10.1%) and a mean EDV decrease of 36.0 cm/sec (19.3%) in the ICA contralateral to the CEA. Eight of 38 (21.1%) preoperative contralateral 60% to 99% ICA lesions were reclassified as less than 60% on postoperative duplex scanning. Six of 69 (8.7%) preoperative lesions of less than 60% were reclassified as 60% to 99% on postoperative duplex scan. These six preoperative examinations were all close to the criteria for 60% to 99% stenosis (mean PSV, 232.5 cm/sec; mean EDV, 62.5 cm/sec). CONCLUSION: One-fifth of patients with apparent 60% to 99% contralateral ICA lesions before the operation have less than 60% stenosis when restudied with duplex scan after unilateral CEA. Lesions below but near the cutoff for 60% to 99% may be reclassified as 60% to 99% on the postoperative duplex scan. These findings mandate that when duplex scanning is used as the sole imaging modality before CEA, patients with severe bilateral carotid stenosis must have an additional carotid duplex examination before operation on the second side.     

Risk factors for stroke after cardiac surgery: Buffalo Cardiac-Cerebral Study Group

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for stroke in patients undergoing heart surgery.Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent cardiac surgery in three hospitals of the State University of New York at Buffalo system over a 36-month period was completed. Demographics and risk factors were recorded, and stroke and death were determined by chart review. Carotid artery stenosis was determined by duplex examination. Data were analyzed by chi-squared and multiple logistic regression.Results: One thousand one hundred seventy-nine cases were analyzed, with a mortality rate of 2.3%, stroke rate of 1.6%, and combined stroke/death rate of 3.1%. Four variables were found to be associated with an increased risk of stroke: carotid artery stenosis greater than 50%, redo heart surgery, valve surgery, and prior stroke. Five variables were associated with increased mortality rates:; carotid artery stenosis greater than 50%, redo surgery, peripheral vascular disease, longer pump time, and hypercholesterolemia. Carotid artery stenosis greater than 50% was present in 14.7% of cases. Carotid artery stenosis greater than 75% was not itself associated with increased stroke risk. Most strokes occurred more than 24 hours after surgery. Stroke distribution did not correlate with site of carotid artery stenosis greater than 50%.Conclusions: Most neurologic events after heart surgery occur in a subset of patients who can be defined before operation. Whereas carotid artery stenosis greater than 50% is a strong risk factor, the role of prophylactic endarterectomy is unclear. Future studies should focus on this high-risk subgroup. A prospective study of prophylactic carotid endarterectomy in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting is needed. (J VASC SURG 1995;21:359-64.)     

Progression of asymptomatic carotid stenosis: A natural history study in 1004 patients

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to delineate the natural history of the progression of asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Methods: In a 10-year period, 1701 carotid arteries in 1004 patients who were asymptomatic were studied with serial duplex scans (mean follow-up period, 28 months; mean number of scans, 2.9/patient). At each visit, stenoses of the internal carotid artery (ICA) and the external carotid artery (ECA) were categorized as none (0 to 14%), mild (15% to 49%), moderate (50% to 79%), severe (80% to 99%), preocclusive, or occluded. Progression was defined as an increase in ICA stenosis to ≥50% for carotid arteries with a baseline of <50% or as an increase to a higher category of stenosis if the baseline stenosis was ≥50%. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for data analysis. Results: The risk of progression of ICA stenosis increased steadily with time (annualized risk of progression, 9.3%). With multivariate modeling, the four most important variables that affected the progression (P < .02) were baseline ipsilateral ICA stenosis ≥50% (relative risk [RR], 3.34), baseline ipsilateral ECA stenosis ≥50% (RR, 1.51), baseline contralateral ICA stenosis ≥50% (RR, 1.41), and systolic pressure more than 160 mm Hg (RR, 1.37). Ipsilateral neurologic ischemic events (stroke/transient ischemic attack) occurred in association with 14.0% of the carotid arteries that were studied. The progression of ICA stenosis correlated with these events (P < .001), but baseline ICA stenosis was not a significant predictor. Conclusion: In contrast to recently published studies, we found that the risk of progression of carotid stenosis is substantial and increases steadily with time. Baseline ICA stenosis was the most important predictor of the progression, but baseline ECA stenosis also was identified as an important independent predictor. Contralateral ICA stenosis and systolic hypertension were additional significant predictors. We found further that the progression of ICA stenosis correlated with ischemic neurologic events but not baseline stenosis. The data provide justification for the use of serial duplex scans to follow carotid stenosis and suggest that different follow-up intervals may be appropriate for different patient subgroups. (J Vasc Surg 1999;29:208-16.)