Type 1 diabetes mellitus and oral health: assessment of coronal and root caries

OBJECTIVES: The oral health of a large cohort of adult insulin-dependent diabetic patients (Type 1), diagnosed 24 years previously with juvenile onset, was comprehensively assessed. This paper describes the prevalence of coronal and root caries in this adult Type 1 diabetic population and evaluates demographic, dietary, behavioral, physiologic, salivary and medical variables associated with decayed and filled surfaces in the crown (DFS) or root (RDFS). METHODS: Type 1 diabetes mellitus subjects participating in this oral health evaluation had been monitored for 6-8 years as participants in the University of Pittsburgh, Department of Epidemiology, longitudinal study of medical complications associated with diabetes. Four hundred and six diabetic subjects received a comprehensive oral health examination during one of their regularly scheduled medical visits. Oral assessments included coronal and root caries, missing teeth, edentulism, periodontal status, soft tissue pathologies, salivary function and health behaviors. Sixteen diabetic subjects and one control subject were edentulous. Coronal and root caries data from the remaining 390 dentate diabetic subjects were compared with 202 dentate nondiabetic control subjects. RESULTS: The adult Type 1 diabetic subjects were not found to have significantly higher DFS rates as compared with our control subjects or published age-adjusted NHANES III findings. Both control and diabetic subjects had low decayed to filled tooth surface ratios. A linear regression model evaluated possible associations with coronal decayed and filled tooth surfaces (DFS) within the diabetic population. Significant factors included older age, women, fewer missing teeth, more frequent use of dental floss, more frequent visits to the dentist during the last 12 months, and diabetic nephropathy. The prevalence of RDFS was higher in the diabetic subjects as compared to recruited control subjects. Neither dietary behaviors nor glycemic control were found to contribute to coronal or root caries. CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with presence of coronal and root caries and fillings are discussed. Possible causes and implications for the association between DFS and diabetic nephropathy are provided.     

Prevalence of and factors associated with root decay in older adults in Canada

We collected data on the oral health status and treatment needs of a random sample of persons aged 50 years and over. Data on root decay were obtained from the 183 subjects who were dentate. All remaining teeth were examined for root decay and restorations, whether root surfaces were affected by recession or not. Analysis was undertaken by case and root surface, with separate analyses of decayed (DS), and decayed and filled (DFS) root surfaces. One or more root surfaces with untreated decay were found in 37.2% of subjects, while one or more decayed or filled root surfaces were found in 56.8%. The mean number of decayed surfaces was 1.3 per person, and the mean number of decayed and filled root surfaces was 2.6. Multiple and logistic regression analyses showed that oral health variables were more important predictors of the presence and severity of root decay than demographic, general health, or dental care factors.     

Dental caries prevalence and dental care utilization among the very old

BACKGROUND: This article reports on coronal and root caries prevalence and dental care utilization patterns of elderly Iowans aged 79 years or older. METHODS: The sample for this study was 449 people who were surviving members of the Iowa 65+ Rural Health Study cohort originally recruited in 1981. The authors focused their analyses on the 342 of these who were dentate. Examinations were conducted in subjects' homes by trained and calibrated examiners, using a halogen headlight, a mouth mirror, a color-coded periodontal probe and a no. 23 explorer. RESULTS: The mean age of subjects was 85.1 years (range 79-101 years), and they had a mean of 19.4 remaining teeth. Nearly all subjects (96 percent) had coronal decay experience, while 23 percent of the subjects had untreated coronal decay, about one-fourth of which was recurrent. Nearly two-thirds (64 percent) of the sample had root caries experience, with 23 percent having untreated root caries. Utilization of dental services was high among the dentate elderly, with nearly three-quarters reporting having visited a dentist within the past year. Nearly all reported that they paid for dental care themselves with no third-party coverage. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study of the very old suggest that coronal and root caries remain prevalent, with high levels of dental care utilization among those who have retained natural teeth. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: As the U.S. population ages, and more teeth are retained, demand for dental services in the population of the oldest elderly people is likely to increase.     

Coronal and Root Decay Experience in Older Adults in Ontario, Canada

This paper describes the coronal and root caries experience of subjects aged 50 years and older living in four communities in Ontario, Canada. The data were obtained as part of a comprehensive epidemiologic study of the oral health and treatment needs of this population. Caries experience was defined as the number of decayed and filled coronal and root surfaces per subject. Of 907 subjects interviewed and clinically examined, 78.3 percent were dentate and retained a mean of 18.9 teeth. The mean number of coronal decayed and filled surf aces was 23.9; 95.6 percent of subjects had at least one coronal DFS. The mean number of decayed and filled root surfaces was 3.6; 70.9 percent had at least one root DFS. The percent D/DFS was 3.5 for coronal and 20.0 for root caries. In linear regression analysis the number of teeth, making regular preventive visits, being born in Canada, and educational status emerged as predictors of coronal DFS. Predictors of root DFS were the number of surf aces with recession, the number of coronal DFS, the number of teeth, age, sex, and smoking status. These variables accounted for 42 percent and 35 percent of the variance in the number of coronal and root DFS, respectively.     

Root surface and coronal caries in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) on coronal and root surface caries and to investigate some factors suspected of being related to or interacting with DM, that may be associated with coronal and root surface caries. METHODS: A stratified cross-sectional study was conducted in 105 type 2 diabetic patients and 103 non-diabetic subjects of the same age and gender. Coronal and root surface caries, exposed root surfaces, periodontal status, stimulated salivary functions, oral hygiene status, oral health behaviors, and counts of mutans streptococci and lactobacilli were measured. RESULTS: Type 2 diabetic patients compared with non-diabetic subjects had a higher prevalence of root surface caries (40.0% versus 18.5%; P = 0.001), a higher number of decayed/filled root surfaces (1.2 +/- 0.2 versus 0.5 +/- 0.1; P < 0.01) and a higher percentage of generalized periodontitis (98.1% versus 87.4%; P < 0.01); but the prevalence and decayed/filled surface of coronal caries was not significantly different (83.8% versus 72.8% and 8.0 +/- 9.4 versus 6.3 +/- 7.5 respectively). The factors associated with root surface caries included type 2 DM, a low saliva buffer capacity, more missing teeth, and existing coronal caries; whereas wearing removable dentures, more missing teeth, a high number of lactobacilli, and a low saliva buffer capacity were associated with coronal caries. CONCLUSION: Type 2 DM is a significant risk factor for root surface, but not for coronal caries. Periodontal disease should be treated early in type 2 diabetic subjects to reduce the risk of subsequent root surface caries.     

Oral Disease Beliefs, Behaviors, and Health Status of Korean-Americans

Previous research with other ethnic minorities has shown that culture and age cohort, as well as language and economic limitations, act as barriers to obtaining dental care and maintaining good oral health. This study compared self-reported oral health attitudes, self-efficacy, and dental practices of 20 younger and 23 elderly Korean-Americans. Oral assessments were also conducted to determine plaque and gingival status, and root and coronal caries. Significant differences emerged in health self-efficacy (P less than .01) and preventive health orientation (P less than .002). Elderly had fewer teeth (P less than .0001), more decayed and filled root surfaces (P less than .05 and P less than .004, respectively), and more decayed and filled coronal surfaces (P less than .001 and P less than .03). Both groups showed higher levels of distal and mesial plaque than occlusal and cervical plaque; however, the elderly had higher rates of both (P less than .0001). Gingival status was also worse for the elderly, on distal and mesial (P less than .01), facial (P less than .01), and lingual (P less than .01) surfaces. These differences are striking, since the elderly reported visiting the dentist more recently (P less than .0001); but most of these visits were for prosthodontic and emergency care. Better preventive dental care and education are necessary for elderly immigrants who have not been exposed to preventive dentistry in their home countries.     

Models for coronal caries and root fragments in an elderly population.

A random sample of 809 dentate, home-dwelling people 65 years of age or older participated in a study to determine the prevalence of dental diseases in the elderly. Part of the study investigated the determinants of coronal caries and root fragments in these older adults. Using a wide array of potentially explanatory variables available, logistic regression models were developed to identify relationships between these variables and coronal caries and root fragments. The variables with the most explanatory power in the coronal caries model were the presence of decayed root surfaces, lower salivary flow rate, lack of regular dental care and an interaction variable including race and a perception of financial well-being. When a subsequent model was created that did not include decayed root surfaces or root fragments as potential explanatory variables, an additional variable relating to self-perception of mouth appearance emerged. The strongest variables in the model for root fragments were episodic (vs. regular) dental visits, presence of root caries, lack of replacement for lost teeth, high levels of Streptococcus mutans and number of teeth present in the mouth.     

Consequences of Success: Do More Teeth Translate into More Disease and Utilization?

Objectives : Increased tooth retention coupled with increased numbers of older adults means that the actual number of teeth at risk to dental disease will increase sharply. Whether this increase in the number of teeth will translate into more disease and utilization in unknown. The purpose of this study was to test this "more teeth, therefore more dental disease" theory using cross-sectional data. Methods : In-home personal interview and oral examination data were obtained on a probability sample of elders aged 70 years and older living in the six New England states using the Medicare beneficiary list as a sampling frame. Data on dental utilization, number of teeth, dental caries, and periodontal disease were included in the current analysis. Results : Analysis of variance on subjects with 1–10 (Group 1), 11–24 (Group 2), and 25–32 (Group 3) teeth show that the extent of bleeding on probing, pocket depth, and loss of attachment all increase as numbers of teeth increase. Similarly, a greater number of restored coronal and root surfaces were found in Group 3 relative to the other two groups. Mean numbers of decayed and filled coronal surfaces were 8.4 in Group 1,33.0 in Group 2, and 50.3 in Group 3. In contrast, unrestored coronal and root surfaces were significantly higher in Group 1 (mean root DS=1.3) than Group 3 (mean root DS=0.3). Utilization patterns of those with successful aging dentitions (Group 3) show that they are visiting dentists more frequently than the compromised group (Group 1). Conclusion : These cross-sectional data obtained from a probability sample of New England elders show that subjects who retained higher numbers of teeth have more periodontal disease and dental caries experience, and visit the dentist more frequently.     

Root surface caries and associated factors

Abstract – The prevalence of root surfaces caries in 208 randomly selected 55, 65, and 75-yr-old Swedes was related to the frequency of coronal caries, the number of remaining teeth and to bacteriologic, salivary, and dietary variables. At least one decayed or filled root surface was found in 89% of the individuals and all of those had also experienced coronal caries. The frequency of root surface caries was positively correlated to the frequency of coronal decay and negatively correlated to the number of remaining teeth and exposed root surfaces. The study shows that the same factors which are associated with enamel caries seem to be of importance in determining the development of root surface caries. The variation in the frequency of root surface caries was best explained by the salivary levels of mutans streptococci and lactobacilli, the percentage of surfaces harboring plaque and the frequency of carbohydrate intake. Other contributory factors were the saliva secretion rate and the buffer capacity.     

Root surface caries and associated factors

The prevalence of root surfaces caries in 208 randomly selected 55, 65, and 75-yr-old Swedes was related to the frequency of coronal caries, the number of remaining teeth and to bacteriologic, salivary, and dietary variables. At least one decayed or filled root surface was found in 89% of the individuals and all of those had also experienced coronal caries. The frequency of root surface caries was positively correlated to the frequency of coronal decay and negatively correlated to the number of remaining teeth and exposed root surfaces. The study shows that the same factors which are associated with enamel caries seem to be of importance in determining the development of root surface caries. The variation in the frequency of root surface caries was best explained by the salivary levels of mutans streptococci and lactobacilli, the percentage of surfaces harboring plaque and the frequency of carbohydrate intake. Other contributory factors were the saliva secretion rate and the buffer capacity.     

Self-estimated oral and general health are related and associated with clinically investigated dental health

The aim was to investigate whether the self-estimation of oral and general health is correlated and related to clinical parameters for dental health. Furthermore, to investigate the influence of socioeconomic factors on the self-assessment of oral and general health. During 2007 a dental health survey was performed in the Community of G?vle located in central Sweden. 1, 224 subjects randomized from the general population of G?vle (adult population 75, 000) were invited to participate. Seven hundred and forty-eight individuals answered a questionnaire regarding their health and 373 of these subjects participated in a dental examination. Self-estimated oral and general health was correlated (p<0.0001, r=0.35) and individuals who perceived their oral health as bad had more decayed surfaces, surfaces with secondary caries, fewer teeth and more bleeding on probing than those with good estimated oral health (p<0.017 for all). In a logistic regression analysis with self-estimated oral health as the dependent variable was related to, the independent variables NT, DFT, self-estimated general health and age were related to self-estimated oral health, but not to income or educational level. However, subjects with low disposable income and low education level had significantly more clinical caries and fewer teeth than subjects with high income or a high educational level. Conclusions: In the present study, self-estimation of oral and general health was correlated and related to some clinical oral parameters. Subjects in the low socioeconomic group had worse dental health and a tendency to underestimate their need of dental care.     

Prevalence of root caries in a selected population of older adults in Japan

In this study, the prevalence of root caries in a sample of Japanese elders was investigated along with various aetiological factors. Two hundred and eighty-seven independently living elderly people over the age of 60 years were examined for the prevalence of active, inactive, and filled root lesions as well as the number of teeth. General health, oral status and brushing habits were surveyed, and salivary flow was determined in terms of flow rate and subjective feeling of dry mouth during eating. About 39% of the subjects had one or more decayed roots and 53.3% had at least one decayed or filled lesion. Root caries was seen most frequently on canine teeth followed by the first premolar. The number of decayed or filled lesions increased with increasing number of residual teeth (Kruskal-Wallis test, P = 0.033), however, there was no association between the proportion of teeth with root decay and the number of teeth. For subjects with 20 or more teeth, the number of decayed roots is likely to be lower in subjects who reported brushing frequently (P = 0.058), and higher in subjects with low salivary flow (P = 0.059) or subjective feeling of dry mouth (P = 0.052) (Chi-squared). The presence of decayed lesions is likely to be related to dry mouth (P = 0.057, odds ratio 3.13) and brushing frequency (P = 0.088, odds ratio 1.76) (Multiple logistic regression analysis). The results indicate a high frequency of root surface caries in this Japanese community-dwelling older population. Oral hygiene status and low salivary flow or perceived dry mouth were potential risk factors for disease.     

Dental caries history in nine children with chromosome 18p deletion syndrome

Chromosome 18p deletion syndrome is caused by the deletion of a portion of genetic material on the short (p) arm of chromosome 18. Many of 100 prior case reports In the medical literature describing the dental health of subjects with this syndrome reported multiple carles associated with the syndrome. At the third annual International conference of The Chromosome 18 Registry & Research Society, dental examinations were carried out on nine children with chromosome 18p deletion syndrome and five of their unaffected siblings. The dental examination Included an intra-oral evaluation of coronal decay and filled permanent teeth surfaces (DFS) and decayed and filled primary tooth surfaces (dfs) using a mouth mirror, explorer, and a high-Intensity fiber optic light An evaluation of the data revealed that five of nine children with 18p deletion syndrome (56%) were free of tooth decay or a history of tooth decay. Four of the nine (44%) had tooth decay or a history of tooth decay. The prevalence of decay was quite similar in the genetically unaffected siblings. Three of the five (60%) unaffected siblings of the children with 18p- were free of tooth decay, whereas two of the five (40%) had tooth decay. One of the affected children had a missing mandibular left central incisor. None of the children had abnormally shaped teeth. The caries pattern seems to be similar to that reported in the NHANES III data collected In the United States from 1388–1991. Analysis of these preliminary data suggests that the risk for carles In chromosome 18p deletion syndrome may be lower than previously reported.     

Incidence of tooth loss and dental caries in 60-, 70- and 80-year-old Swedish individuals

Abstract The retention of natural teeth among the elderly is increasing and, in recent studies, dental caries has been identified as the main reason for teeth being extracted. The 5-year incidence of tooth loss and dental caries and the most crucial dental factors for tooth extraction were studied in a random sample of 60-. 70- and 80-year-old inhabitants of Gothenburg, Of the 208 persons examined at baseline, 148 (71%) participated in the follow-up examination: 69, 51 and 28 respectively in the different age groups. In all. 110 teeth had been extracted during the period in 40% of the participants. Only 9 persons had lost three or more teeth. The mean numbers of remaining teeth were 22, 18 and 15 respectively in the 60-, 70- and 80-year age groups and the mean numbers of teeth lost during the 5-year period increased with age from 0.4 in the 60-year-olds to 0.8 and 1.4 in the 70- and 80-year-olds (P<0.05). The major reason for tooth extraction was dental caries and it was found in 60% of all cases and at a higher rate of 77%i in the oldest age group. Fifty-one per cent had developed new coronal carious lesions and 61% had new root carious lesions, while 27% had not developed caries during the period. The mean 5-year increment in decayed and filled coronal surfaces increased with age from 2.3 in the 60-year-olds to 3.7 and 5.3 in the 70- and 80-year-olds (N.S.). The increment in decayed and filled root surfaces was higher in women than men, 3.4 compared with 1.8 (N.S.), which also increased with age from 1.4 in the 60-year-olds to 2.4 and 5.5 in the 70- and 80-year-olds (P<0.0001). It was concluded from this study that few teeth had been lost during the 5-year period but that dental caries still appeared to be a serious problem among some very elderly people.     

Twenty-four month incidence of root caries among a diverse group of adults

OBJECTIVES: (1) Describe for a diverse sample the 24-month incidence of root caries, and (2) test its association with a broad range of clinical, behavioral, financial, and sociodemographic factors. METHODS: The Florida Dental Care Study was a cohort study of randomly selected subjects who had at least 1 tooth and were 45 years or older at baseline. In-person interviews and clinical examinations were conducted at baseline and 24 months, with 6-monthly telephone interviews between those times; 723 subjects participated for both examinations. A multinomial logistic regression was done to predict whether the subject was in one of four mutually exclusive groups [new root decay only (NDO); new root filling(s) only (NFO); both new decay and new filling(s) (BOTH), or had neither (NONE)]. RESULTS: Thirty-six percent of subjects had at least 1 new root decayed and/or filled surface (DFS); 17% were in the NDO group, 14% in the NFO group, and 5% in the BOTH group. When limited to participants who had a nonzero increment, the mean (SD) DFS was 2.7 (2.9). Baseline clinical condition (presence of root decay, root filling(s), coronal decay, noncarious root defects, number of teeth present, percent of teeth with at least 4 mm of attachment loss) was predictive of moving from the NONE group into the NDO, NFO, or BOTH groups. The addition of behavioral, financial, and sociodemographic factors improved model fit. For example, regular dental attenders were significantly more likely to move from the NONE group into the NFO group, but regular attendance was not associated with a lower probability of moving from the NONE group into the NDO or BOTH groups. CONCLUSIONS: Root caries is a substantive dental health problem in this diverse sample of adults. These analyses demonstrate the utility of disaggregating caries incidence into four mutually exclusive groups for predictive models.     

Dental caries among disadvantaged 3- to 4-year-old children in northern Manhattan

PURPOSE: The study was conducted to determine the prevalence of early childhood caries (ECC), untreated caries, and the ratio of posterior to anterior caries in a disadvantaged predominantly Hispanic or African-American urban population. Data are compared to NHANES III to assess the caries burden in our cohort. Comparisons are made to the aggregate and to minorities within the national database. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for children enrolled in a Head Start or day care program in the communities of Washington-Heights and Central and East Harlem and seen on the community organization's mobile dental van between 1995 and 1997. The study included only children 3 to 4 years of age at the initial examination (n=1,605). A single examiner provided all the examinations. The mean number of decayed and filled surfaces (dfs), decayed surfaces (ds) and filled surfaces (fs), the percentage of decayed of total decayed and filled surfaces (%d/dfs), decayed and filled teeth (dft), decayed teeth (dt) and filled teeth (ft), and the percentage of decayed of total decayed and filled teeth (%d/dft) were calculated. Posterior vs anterior d, f, dft, dfs and d-anterior/total d, and d-posterior/total d were tabulated. Northern Manhattan data was tabulated and compared to NHANES III (1988-1994) in the aggregate and for subpopulations categorized by gender and ethnicity. All results are also reported for children with at least one decayed or filled tooth. T-tests were used to assess for significant differences. RESULTS: There was even representation of males (50%) and females (50%). Mean dft was 1.08 overall, and 3.14 for children with dft>0. The level of untreated decay, %d/ dft, was 91%, significantly higher than the US national population which is 76% overall, and 76% for African Americans and Mexican Americans within the US national population. CONCLUSIONS: The children in this population have higher caries prevalence and a higher level of untreated caries than the national means as reported in NHANES III. The high level of untreated decay found in this particularly disadvantaged community suggests that enhanced dental services targeting the very young are needed in these communities.     

Root caries in older people attending a general dental practice in East Sussex

With increasing numbers of older people retaining their natural dentitions, dentists are becoming increasingly aware of the problem of dental caries occurring on exposed root surfaces--root caries. This study reports the prevalence of root caries in a selected older population, living in the community and attending a general dental practice in Bexhill, East Sussex. A total of 146 non-institutionalised people, aged at least 55 years with at least 12 teeth, were examined. Most of the subjects (88.4%) had evidence of root caries, males and denture wearers having more lesions than females and non-denture wearers, respectively. Active coronal caries was present in only 11.6% of the subjects, whereas active (soft or leathery) root caries lesions were present in 31.5% of the subjects. The teeth and surfaces most commonly affected by root caries were found to be similar to those seen in previous epidemiological surveys. The majority of active root caries lesions were within 1 mm of the gingival margin, while inactive lesions tended to be greater than or equal to 1 mm from the gingival margin. Colour of root caries lesions was not diagnostic of caries activity. A more detailed method of recording root caries lesions is also described.     

The prevalence and experience of oral diseases in Adelaide nursing home residents

BACKGROUND: The twenty-first century will see the evolution of a population of dentate older Australians with dental needs very different from those of older adults in past years. This study provided comprehensive information concerning oral disease prevalence in older South Australian nursing home residents. METHODS: This paper presents cross-sectional baseline results. RESULTS: Most of the 224 residents, from seven randomly selected nursing homes, were functionally dependent, medically compromised, cognitively impaired and behaviourally difficult older adults who presented many complex challenges to carers and to dental professionals. Two-thirds (66 per cent) were edentulous with many dental problems and treatment needs. Dentate residents had a mean of 11.9 teeth present, higher than previously reported. The prevalence and experience of coronal and root caries and plaque accumulation was very high in dentate residents; especially males, those admitted more than three years previously, those who ate fewer food types and those who were severely cognitively impaired. These residents had more retained roots, decayed teeth and missing teeth, and fewer filled teeth when compared with data for community-dwelling older adults. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted the poor oral health status of these nursing home residents and the great impact of dementia on their high levels of oral diseases.