Inhibition of fog-induced bronchoconstriction by nedocromil sodium and sodium cromoglycate in intrinsic asthma: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

The efficacy of pretreatment with two doses of nedocromil sodium (4 and 8 mg) and sodium cromoglycate 12 mg were compared with placebo in inhibiting the bronchoconstriction induced by inhalation of ultrasonically nebulized distilled water ('fog') in 10 subjects with intrinsic asthma. Each fog challenge consisted of three inhalations of 30, 60 and 120 s duration, respectively, given at 4-min intervals, and the bronchoconstrictor response was assessed as the postchallenge percentage fall in FEV1 from baseline. Statistically significant drug effects (p less than 0.05) were observed after 120 s of fog challenge: both nedocromil sodium 4 and 8 mg and sodium cromoglycate were significantly more effective than placebo in inhibiting fog-induced bronchoconstriction; in addition, nedocromil sodium 4 mg proved statistically significantly more effective than sodium cromoglycate.     

3-min step test and treadmill exercise for evaluating exercise-induced asthma.

A simple exercise test would be useful for detecting exercise-induced asthma, a common problem in asthmatic children. The current study compared the 3-min step test with treadmill exercise for evaluating exercise-induced asthma in asthmatic children and assessed whether responses to both tests are influenced by baseline lung function and habitual physical activity. A series of 154 asthmatic children (84 male children; mean age 12.9 +/- 0.9 yrs) underwent a 3-min step-test and treadmill testing on different days within a week at least 24 h apart. Before both tests each subject did spirometry to obtain the baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). After both exercise challenges all subjects did serial spirometry and the lowest FEV1 recorded over time was used to calculate the fall in FEV1 expressed as a percentage of the measured pre-exercise (baseline) value (% fall in FEV1) and the area above the FEV1 curve (AAC0-30 min) expressed as a percentage of the pre-exercise value. Changes in both exercise variables were also analysed in percentile subgroups defined by questionnaire answers on habitual physical activity in hours. The mean % fall in FEV1 was significantly higher for treadmill exercise than for the step test (15.0 +/- 7.5 versus 11.7 +/- 5.9); and the AAC0-30 min was larger for treadmill than for the step test (-261.6 +/- 139.9% versus -197.3 +/- 105.0% min). In all subgroups defined by habitual physical activity the mean % fall in FEV1 decreased more after treadmill exercise than after the step test. After step test and treadmill exercise no significant correlation was found between % fall in FEV1 and baseline lung function, or between % fall in FEV1 among groups defined by habitual physical activity. Although the 3-min step test yields a lower % fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and a lower value of the area above the FEV1 curve than treadmill testing, it is a quick, economical, reproducible and portable alternative procedure for identifying exercise-induced asthma in outpatients and epidemiological studies. Baseline lung function and habitual physical activity have no influence on the amount or duration of exercise-induced asthma.     

Comparison of bronchial responses to ultrasonically nebulized distilled water, exercise, and methacholine in asthma

We compared the responses to inhaled methacholine, ultrasonically nebulized distilled water, and exercise in 25 subjects with atopic asthma. The methacholine inhalation test and challenges with distilled water and exercise were performed on three separate days 48 hours apart. Bronchial responsiveness to methacholine and ultrasonically nebulized distilled water was measured as the concentration of methacholine (PC20M) and the volume output of the ultrasonic nebulizer (PO20 UNDW) producing a 20 percent fall in the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). The response to exercise was expressed as the percentage of fall in FEV1 from the value before exercise. Seventeen subjects showed a fall in FEV1 of more than 20 percent after exercise. Eight subjects had a stimulus-response curve to distilled water that was flat up to the maximal volume output from the nebulizer, but only four of them also showed no significant response to exercise. The response to exercise correlated better with PO20 UNDW (r = -0.66; p less than 0.01) than with PC20M (r = -0.19; p greater than 0.5) in those responding to distilled water. In all of the tested subjects, exercise-induced bronchoconstriction correlated with PC20M (r = -0.61; p less than 0.01). The mean PC20M was significantly lower in the subjects with a significant response to distilled water and exercise (p less than 0.001 and p less than 0.0001, respectively). We concluded that ultrasonically nebulized distilled water and exercise provoke significant bronchoconstriction in the subjects with more severe nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness. The correlation found between the two stimuli supports the hypothesis that they act by similar mechanisms.     

Nedocromil sodium inhibits the increase in airway reactivity induced by platelet activating factor in humans.

To investigate the effect of nedocromil sodium on changes in airway reactivity to methacholine induced by platelet activating factor, we studied 12 nonasthmatic, nonatopic subjects (24 to 41 years) in a double-blind trial. The FEV1 and airflow at 30 percent of vital capacity from a partial forced expiration (V30p) were used to assess changes in airway caliber. Two concentration-response curves to doubling concentrations of MCh (from 0.3 mg/ml) were performed 48 h apart. The concentrations of MCh causing a 20 percent fall in FEV1 (PC20FEV1) or a 40 percent fall in V30p (PC40V30p) were calculated. After the first MCh challenge, subjects were matched by airway reactivity and randomly assigned to nedocromil sodium (two puffs qid 2 mg/puff) or placebo treatment. Two days after the second MCh challenge, PAF was inhaled, and changes in airway caliber were recorded. Administration of either nedocromil sodium or placebo was ended at this time and airway response to MCh was assessed two days after PAF. The two concentration-response curves to MCh obtained before PAF exposure were superimposable. The PAF caused a dose-related bronchoconstriction in both groups; the maximal fall in V30p was 27.6 +/- 6.6 percent (mean +/- SE) in the nedocromil sodium group and 37.4 +/- 4.6 percent in the placebo group. Two days after PAF, the PC20FEV1 did not change in subjects who received nedocromil sodium (4.86 vs 4.32 mg/ml; geometric mean), but it fell from 6.59 to 1.12 mg/ml (p less than 0.05) in placebo-treated subjects. These results indicate that nedocromil sodium inhibits PAF-induced increase in airway reactivity.     

Nedocromil sodium inhibits responsiveness to inhaled mannitol in asthmatic subjects

Nedocromil sodium inhibits the response to exercise-induced asthma (EIA). Mannitol given as a powder by inhalation is an osmotic stimulus that identifies EIA. We studied the acute effect of nedocromil on airway responsiveness to mannitol in 24 asthmatic subjects. After a control day, nedocromil (8 mg) or its placebo was administered randomized, double blind, 10 min before a challenge with progressively increasing doses of mannitol. Nedocromil inhibited the response to mannitol and there was a significant increase in the dose of mannitol required to cause a 15% reduction in FEV(1) (PD(15)) after nedocromil 409 (316,503) mg compared with placebo 156 (106,229) mg (p < 0.001). In the presence of nedocromil 12 subjects no longer recorded a 15% decrease in FEV(1) in response to mannitol. The remaining 12 required a significantly greater dose of mannitol to achieve a 15% decrease in FEV(1) after nedocromil. Following nedocromil, a plateau in responsiveness to mannitol was observed in 14 subjects. Nedocromil significantly inhibits the responsiveness to inhaled mannitol in asthmatic subjects.     

Nedocromil sodium in the treatment of exercise-induced asthma: a meta-analysis.

Exercise-induced asthma (or bronchoconstriction) afflicts millions of people worldwide. While generally self-limiting, it can hinder performance and reduce activity levels, thus it is an important condition to diagnose and treat. The objective of this review was to assess the prophylactic effect of a single dose of nedocromil sodium on exercise-induced asthma. The Cochrane Airways Group trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Current Contents, reference lists of relevant articles, review articles and textbooks were searched for randomized trials comparing a single dose of nedocromil to placebo to prevent exercise-induced asthma in people >6 yrs of age. Authors and the drug manufacturer were contacted for additional trials. Trial quality assessments and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers. Authors were contacted when possible. Twenty trials were included. All were rated as having good methodological quality. Nedocromil inhibited bronchoconstriction in all age groups. The pooled weighted mean difference for the maximum percentage fall in forced expiratory volume in one second was 15.6%, (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 13.2-18.1) and for the peak expiratory flow was 15.0% (95% CI: 8.3-21.6). These differences are both statistically and clinically significant. After nedocromil the time to recover normal lung function was <10 min compared to >30 min with placebo. Nedocromil had a greater effect on people with a fall in lung function of >30% from baseline. There were no significant adverse effects reported with this short-term use. In conclusion, Nedocromil taken before exercise appears to reduce the severity and duration of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. This effect appears to be more pronounced as severity increases.     

孟鲁司特钠治疗运动诱发性支气管收缩的临床研究

目的　观察孟鲁司特钠治疗轻、中度支气管哮喘(简称哮喘)并发运动诱发支气管收缩(EIB)或运动性哮喘(EIA)的治疗及预防作用。方法　采用前瞻性开放、自身治疗前、后对照的方法。选择轻、中度哮喘并运动激发试验阳性患者30例,给予孟鲁司特钠每晚10mg治疗1个月。分别于治疗前1d、治疗后3d及4周进行运动激发试验。主要观察运动后的前60min一秒钟用力呼气容积(FEV1)自基线下降的百分比时间曲线下面积(AUC0~60min),运动后FEV1最大下降程度(FEV1最低值)及自最低FEV1恢复至运动前基值5%以内所需的时间(FEV1最低值恢复时间)。结果　孟鲁司特钠治疗前1d、治疗后3d和治疗后4周,运动激发试验后AUC0~60min分别为(39±21)、(13±14)、(12±14)%·min,治疗前、后比较差异有统计学意义(P<001);FEV1最低值分别为(18±06)、(21±06)、(23±08)L,治疗前、后比较差异有统计学意义(P<001);FEV1最低值恢复时间分别为(51±36)、(26±28)、(25±33)min,治疗前、后比较恢复时间显著缩短(P<001),并持续1个月。EIB/EIA患者孟鲁司特钠治疗前、后肺功能[FEV1、峰流速(PEFR)]均可维持接近正常且无明显变化。吸入糖皮质激素不能预防EIB/EIA。结论　孟鲁司特钠对轻度哮喘患者并发EIB/EIA疗效和预防作用显著,而且安全、快捷。     

Felodipine, a new calcium antagonist, modifies exercise-induced asthma

Recently, calcium antagonists have been reported to have a clinically beneficial effect in patients with asthma. Felodipine is a new calcium antagonist of the dihydropyridine group with a high selectivity for arteriolar smooth muscle; it is under clinical investigation for the treatment of hypertension. In this double-blind, randomized crossover trial in 9 patients, the effect of 10 mg felodipine in oral solution on exercise-induced asthma was compared with a placebo on separate days. The FEV1 was at least 80% of the predicted normal value, with variation between study days of less than 10%. Heart rate, blood pressure, and FEV1 were measured before and at 15 and 30 min after each treatment. The exercise test consisted of steady state running at submaximal work loads for 6 to 8 min and started at 30 min after treatments. FEV1 was measured at 1, 2, 5, 10, 15, and 30 min after the end of exercise. The predrug baseline FEV1 values were comparable on the 2 days of the study, and felodipine had no effect on the resting lung function. The mean percentage fall in FEV1 (SEM) after exercise with placebo was 27.0 (4.5)%, and with felodipine it was 13.5 (3.7)%. The difference between felodipine and placebo was statistically significant. While receiving felodipine, the resting heart rate was increased by 15%, with a tendency to lower systolic and diastolic blood pressures. The heart rate after exercise was higher during felodipine treatment than during placebo treatment. One patient receiving placebo and 7 receiving felodipine noted a transient headache. Two patients receiving felodipine also noticed lightheadedness after exercise.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Prevention of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction by a new leukotriene antagonist (SK&F 104353). A double-blind study versus disodium cromoglycate and placebo.

The effects of 800 micrograms of inhaled SK&F 104353, a peptidoleukotriene receptor antagonist, and of 20 mg disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction were compared in 18 asthmatic patients. The study was conducted according to a double-blind, crossover, randomized, placebo-controlled design. Two baseline exercise tests were carried out, and pulmonary function tests were done before and at 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min after completion of the exercise. Patients showing a 20% or greater decrease in FEV1 in both exercise challenges entered the blinded portion of the study. When placebo was administered before exercise, FEV1 fell to the same extent as during the baseline phase. After SK&F 104353 and DSCG, the bronchoconstriction was attenuated. The mean maximal percentage fall in FEV1 after exercise was 29% after placebo and 20% after SK&F 104353 and DSCG. The differences between the two active treatments did not reach the 5% level of statistical significance, though at 20 min SK&F 104353 showed a more pronounced effect than DSCG. The protective effect suggests an important role of leukotrienes in the pathogenesis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.     

Effects of ipratropium bromide nebulizer solution with and without preservatives in the treatment of acute and stable asthma.

In a recent study, it was suggested that the preservatives in ipratropium bromide nebulizer solution may cause a paradoxic bronchoconstrictor response in 20 percent or more of patients with stable asthma. The frequency of this response in patients with acute asthma is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the acute effects of the usual dose of nebulized ipratropium bromide (0.25 mg) in patients with either stable or acute asthma using formulations with and without added preservatives. Twenty-five patients with stable asthma and 25 patients with acute asthma were studied. Each subject was given preservative-containing ipratropium bromide, preservative-free ipratropium bromide, pH 7 preservative-free ipratropium bromide, and saline solution in random order using a double-blind crossover technique with at least 4 h between drug administrations. Very frequent measurements of FEV1 were made for 30 min after each drug administration and then 5 mg of albuterol was nebulized and the FEV1 was measured again after another 30 min. Changes in FEV1 were expressed as a percentage of the predicted FEV1. Paradoxic bronchoconstriction to ipratropium was detected in only one patient with acute asthma (12 percent fall in FEV1) but in none of the patients with stable asthma. A 6 percent fall in FEV1 change occurred with the saline solution in this subject suggesting that the response may have been a nonspecific one due to increased bronchial responsiveness. The mean response (+/- 1 SD) to albuterol plus either preservative-containing ipratropium, preservative-free ipratropium, or pH7 preservative-free ipratropium was significantly greater (p less than 0.05) than the response to albuterol alone both in the patients with acute asthma (25 +/- 12 percent, 27 +/- 15 percent, 26 +/- 15 percent, and 20 +/- 15 percent, respectively) and stable asthma (26 +/- 7 percent, 25 +/- 8 percent, 24 +/- 6 percent, and 22 +/- 9 percent) supporting the use of ipratropium bromide as an additional bronchodilator in patients with asthma who do not show a satisfactory response to nebulized beta-adrenergic agonist.     

Effect of inhaled preservatives on asthmatic subjects. I. Sodium metabisulfite

Sodium metabisulfite (MBS) is used as a preservative in food and wine and frequently triggers attacks of asthma. To determine the characteristics of responses to inhaled MBS, 30 asthmatic subjects and 16 nonasthmatic subjects inhaled MBS, in concentrations of 6.2, 12.5, 50, and 100 mg/ml, from a DeVilbiss No. 40 nebulizer (DeVilbiss Co., Somerset, PA) in doses ranging from 0.1 to 12.8 mumol. Response was measured as the dose that caused a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20FEV1). All the asthmatic subjects responded; one of the atopic, nonasthmatic subjects responded and none of the nonatopic, nonasthmatic subjects responded. The response occurred within 1 min, and most subjects recovered to within 10% of baseline after 30 to 40 min. Dose-response curves to MBS were steep and were reproducible, within a 7-day period, to within one doubling dose, with mean PD20FEV1 values of 2.17 and 2.11 mumol in 11 subjects. There was no correlation between PD20FEV1 values to MBS and histamine, and inhalation of MBS did not enhance responses to subsequent challenge with histamine (mean PD20FEV1 to histamine was 0.65 mumol and to histamine 1 h after MBS was 0.74 mumol). Challenge with MBS (mean PD20FEV1 4.07 mumol) did not cause refractoriness to a second challenge 1 h later (mean PD20FEV1 5.39 mumol). Of 20 subjects tested, prior inhalation of 8 mg nedocromil sodium blocked the response to MBS in 15 subjects and reduced it in two others. Cromolyn sodium (4 mg) blocked the response to MBS in three subjects but did not alter the mean PD20FEV1 in the remaining 17 subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The twenty-metre shuttle-running test: a combined test for maximal oxygen uptake and exercise-induced asthma?

A maximal multistage 'twenty-metre shuttle-running test' has already been developed to estimate maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max). This field test requires little equipment or expertise, can be performed simultaneously by several subjects, and is widely used in physical education lessons. The present study assessed the potential for this test to provoke exercise-induced asthma in 73 schoolboys, aged 15-16 years. Measurements of the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were made at rest and 10 min after the twenty-metre shuttle-running test; exercise-induced asthma was defined as greater than a 10% fall in FEV1 after exercise. The pupils achieved 73 +/- 19 shuttles (mean +/- SD) giving a VO2 max of 47.0 +/- 5.3 ml kg-1 min-1. Exercise-induced asthma was documented in eight pupils (11%); two were known asthmatics who, despite taking pre-exercise B2 agonist treatment, had sharp falls in FEV1 (-25.4 and -25.6%); two had previously experienced occasional chest tightness or wheeze with exercise (-16.5 and -13.2% fall FEV1); but four were asymptomatic, with no previous asthmatic symptoms (-20.0, -18.2, -15.3 and -11.4% fall FEV1). This study has demonstrated the potential of the twenty-metre shuttle-running test to provoke exercise induced-asthma, and may therefore be a useful clinical test to assess for exercise-induced asthma when an estimate of VO2 max would also be helpful. Furthermore, physical education teachers should take basic precautions when using this test.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Exercise-induced flow limitation, dynamic hyperinflation and exercise capacity in patients with bronchial asthma.

It is known that, in stable asthmatics at rest, tidal expiratory flow limitation (EFL) and dynamic hyperinflation (DH) are seldom present. This study investigated whether stable asthmatics develop tidal EFL and DH during exercise with concurrent limitation of maximal exercise work rate (WRmax). A total of 20 asthmatics in a stable condition and aged 32+/-13 yrs (mean+/-SD) with a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 101+/-21% of the predicted value were studied. Only three patients exhibited an FEV1 below the normal limits. On a first visit, patients performed a symptom-limited incremental (20 W.min(-1)) bicycle exercise test. On the second visit, the occurrence of EFL (using the negative expiratory pressure technique) and DH (via reduction in inspiratory capacity) were assessed at rest and when cycling at 33, 66 and 90% of their predetermined WRmax. FEV1 was measured to detect exercise-induced asthma, 5 and 15 min after stopping exercise at 90% WRmax. Only one patient showed EFL at rest, whereas 13 showed EFL and DH during exercise. In these 13 asthmatics, exercise capacity was significantly reduced (WRmax 75+/-9% pred) compared to the seven non-EFL patients (WRmax 95+/-13% pred). Moreover, a significant correlation of WRmax (% pred) to the change in inspiratory capacity (percentage of resting value) from rest to 90% WRmax was found. Tidal EFL during exercise was not associated with exercise-induced asthma, which was detected in only three patients. In conclusion, tidal expiratory flow limitation and dynamic hyperinflation during exercise are common in stable asthmatics with normal spirometric results and without exercise-induced asthma, and may contribute to reduction in exercise capacity.     

Effect of a calcium antagonist, nifedipine, in exercise-induced asthma

The nifedipine effect was studied in 8 extrinsic asthmatic subjects with exercise-induced asthma. Before the exercise the patients received, in a randomized double-blind manner, either 20 mg nifedipine, sublingually or sodium cromoglycate by inhalation on 2 separate days. Nifedipine and sodium cromoglycate in all patients inhibited the exercise fall in FEV1. No differences were found between the two drugs. Nifedipine is a potent antagonist of calcium ion influx in smooth muscle and secretory cells, and these studies suggest that it may inhibit release of mast cell mediators and reduce bronchial smooth muscle contractility in asthma.     

Effects of nedocromil and salbutamol on airway reactivity in children with asthma.

Nedocromil and salbutamol are effective drugs in preventing exercise-induced asthma (EIA). The aim of this study was to compare the protective effects of both drugs and a combination of both drugs against cold dry air-induced bronchoconstriction, using cold dry air challenges (CACh) as a surrogate for exercise. Twenty-five atopic children (mean age 13.7, range 8-18 yrs) with EIA participated in the study. Lung function tests were performed before medication, 30 min after medication and just before CACh, and 3 and 15 min after the challenge on four consecutive days. CACh consisted of a 4-min isocapnic hyperpnoea of -10 degrees C, absolutely dry air. Treatment consisted of nedocromil (two puffs of 2 mg) plus placebo, salbutamol (two puffs of 100 microg) plus placebo, the combination of both drugs, and placebo alone, in a random order. Both active drugs were significantly more protective than placebo and the combination showed an additive effect. Mean maximum postchallenge decrease in forced expiratory volume in one second after placebo was 27+/-8.1%, 12+/-9.5% after nedocromil, 8+/-10.4% after salbutamol, and 4.5+/-6.71% after the combination of both drugs, respectively. These results suggest that both drugs protect against exercise-induced asthma. Although not as effective as salbutamol and combined medication, nedocromil can give sufficient protection for many patients.     

Effect of atrial natriuretic peptide given by intravenous infusion on bronchoconstriction induced by ultrasonically nebulized distilled water (fog).

Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) is secreted by cardiac atria and lung tissue; it has a bronchodilator action in normal subjects and patients with asthma and has been shown to protect against histamine-induced bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma. Bronchoconstriction caused by inhalation of ultrasonically nebulized distilled water (fog), in contrast to histamine-induced bronchoconstriction, has features in common with exercise-induced asthma but can be given more easily in a dose-response fashion. The present study aimed to determine the effect of elevated plasma ANP concentrations on the bronchoconstrictor response to inhalation of fog. Eight patients with atopic asthma were studied, mean baseline FEV1 3.00 1, equivalent to 89% (range 76-103%) predicted. The provocation dose of fog producing a 25% fall in FEV1 (PD25) was determined for each subject. On 4 study days, subjects received an intravenous infusion of placebo or ANP at a rate of 1.25, 3.0, or 10.0 pmol/kg/min in randomized, double-blind manner for 30 min to allow steady-state plasma concentrations to be achieved; the PD25 fog was then administered and FEV1 recorded over 30 min. Mean (SEM) baseline plasma ANP concentration was 19.3 (4.1) pg/ml and increased to 39.4 (6.6), 106.4 (11.1), and 445.9 (105.4) with the three rates of ANP infusion. The highest rate of infusion increased prechallenge FEV1 by 8.7 (2.4)% (p less than 0.01), but the lower rates of infusion had no effect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A comparison of several agents with two delivery systems for the prevention of airway narrowing induced by nebulised pentamidine isethionate

Bronchial narrowing is the major side effect of inhaled nebulised pentamidine isethionate, used for the prophylaxis and treatment of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Several agents and delivery systems were assessed for prophylaxis of bronchial narrowing in HIV-positive males receiving regular nebulised pentamidine isethionate. In a previous study we found the mean maximum fall in FEV1 with nebulised pentamidine alone to be 21%. FEV1 was measured before and after inhaling nebulised pentamidine, preceded by one of the following bronchodilator/immunoregulatory agents: Terbutaline metered dose inhaler (500 micrograms), nebulised salbutamol (5 mg), nebulised ipratropium bromide (500 micrograms), nebulised sodium cromoglycate (20 mg), and nedocromil sodium metered dose inhaler (4 mg). Each agent was administered once only to ten different subjects. Nebulised salbutamol gave most effective prophylaxis against bronchial narrowing induced by nebulised pentamidine (mean maximum fall in FEV1 = 5% vs. 21%, P less than 0.001). Terbutaline given by metered dose inhaler was significantly less effective than high dose terbutaline (10 mg) given by nebuliser, demonstrated in the previous study (mean maximum fall in FEV1 = 14% vs. 6%, P less than 0.05). Mean maximum falls in FEV1 for ipratropium bromide, sodium cromoglycate and nedocromil sodium were 16, 17 and 16%, respectively. High dose beta 2-agonists administered by nebuliser give more effective prophylaxis against nebulised pentamidine-induced bronchial narrowing than either lower doses given by metered dose inhaler, anticholinergics or immunoregulatory drugs.     

Acute protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction by formoterol, salmeterol and terbutaline.

The onset of bronchoprotection as obtained by various beta2-agonists has not been examined in a comparitive study. In this study, the onset of bronchodilation and protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatics after inhalation of the long-acting beta2-agonists formoterol and salmeterol and the short-acting beta2-agonist terbutaline were measured. Twenty-five subjects with asthma and a history of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (mean baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1): 90% predicted; mean fall in FEV1 after exercise: 31% from baseline) were enrolled in this double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, randomized, four-period crossover study. Exercise challenges were performed on 12 days at either 5, 30, or 60 min after inhalation of a single dose of formoterol (12 microg Turbuhaler), salmeterol (50 microg Diskus), terbutaline (500 microg Turbuhaler) or placebo. Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (maximum fall in FEV1 or area under the curve) did not differ significantly between terbutaline, formorerol and salmeterol either 5, 30, or 60 min after inhalation of the study medication. In contrast, the onset of bronchodilation was slower after salmeterol compared to terbutaline and formoterol (p<0.05, each), which both showed a similar time course. At all time points between 5 and 60 min, formoterol provided significantly greater bronchodilation than salmeterol (p<0.05). These data indicate that equipotent doses of the bronchodilators salmeterol, formoterol and terbutaline were similarly effective with respect to their short-term protective potency against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, despite the fact that the time course of bronchodilation was significantly different between the three beta2-agonists.     

Inhibition of hypertonic saline-induced bronchoconstriction by terfenadine and flurbiprofen. Evidence for the predominant role of histamine

We investigated the possible inhibitory effects of terfenadine, a histamine H1-receptor antagonist, and flurbiprofen, a cyclooxygenase inhibitor, on the bronchoconstrictor effect of inhaled 3.6% hypertonic saline in a randomized, double-blind study. Nine mildly asthmatic subjects with a history of exercise-induced asthma took part. This was conducted, first as a dose-response study and, second, as a time-course study. In the dose-response study, the provocative dose of saline-laden air causing a 25% fall in FEV1 was calculated (PD25). Terfenadine (180 mg) and the combination of terfenadine (180 mg) plus flurbiprofen (100 mg) both protected significantly against hypertonic saline challenge, achieving increases in PD25 values by factors of 7.24 and 6.30, respectively. Flurbiprofen (100 mg) also displaced the dose-response to the right, increasing the PD25 by a factor of 1.92, but this protection was significantly less than that afforded by terfenadine. In the time-course studies, a single inhalation of hypertonic saline previously shown to cause at least a 25% fall in FEV1 was administered, and FEV1, was followed for 30 min. Preadministration of terfenadine reduced the mean area under the curve of percentage fall in FEV1-time response by 68.5%, with similar results obtained with the combination of terfenadine and flurbiprofen. We conclude that the bronchoconstriction in asthma provoked by inhaled hypertonic saline is mediated predominantly through the hyperosmolar release of histamine from airway mast cells, with a minor contribution being made by prostanoids.     

Inhibition of exercise-induced asthma by an orally absorbed mast cell stabilizer (M & B 22,948)

M&B 22,948 (2-o-propoxyphenyl-8-azapurin-6-one) is an orally absorbed mast cell stabilizer which is 30 times as potent as disodium cromoglycate in laboratory and animal studies. In a double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over trial we studied the protection afforded by a single oral dose of 10 mg of M&B 22,948 against asthma induced by histamine and exercise, each in 12 patients. Compared with placebo the drug had no significant effect on the response to inhaled histamine but significantly inhibited the fall in FEV1 induced by exercise on treadmill (P less than 0.005). The exercise-induced fall in FEV1 was less following M&B 22,948 than placebo in all patients and the fall was inhibited by more than 50% in five (42%) of 12 patients. The degree of inhibition was significantly correlated with the plasma drug concentration (r = 0.65, P less than 0.025). M&B 22,948 merits evaluation in the treatment of asthma.