Multiprofessional survey of protocol use in the intensive care unit

Purpose

To date, there has been no large multicenter, multiprofessional evaluation of protocol and guideline use in the intensive care unit (ICU). The primary purpose of this study was to describe national availability, development, implementation, and assessment of protocols in ICUs. A secondary objective was to compare perceived utility by ease of use, patient safety, cost containment, and compliance of protocols between nurses, physicians, and pharmacists.

Materials and Methods

The survey was developed and tested for validity by 15 clinicians who identified additional domains of interest. An additional 15 clinicians of the 3 different professions evaluated the survey for relevancy and appropriateness of responses. Three survey experts evaluated survey construction. The survey was uploaded to a Web survey tool and pilot tested for clarity and ease of completion.

Results

The overall response rate for the survey was 18.1% (n = 614). Popular methods of education for protocol implementation included staff meetings (85.3%) and unit-specific in-services (77.7%). Protocols were most often updated when new information was available (40.8%) or every 12 months (17.9%). The most common limitation to development and implementation was limited personnel resources (24.5%) and physicians not wanting to use them (21.3%), respectively. Clinicians indicated that protocols made their job easier and improved cost containment some or most of the time. Sepsis protocols were identified as most useful in promoting patient outcomes by all 3 professions.

Conclusions

The types of protocols available appear to be those assisting with management of high-alert medications. Overcoming the perceived barriers of protocol use within ICUs requires personnel for development and physician support. A better protocol review process may be necessary to assure optimal content, desired outcomes, and consistency with Institute for Safe Medication Practices guidelines.     

A nationwide survey of intensive care unit discharge practices

Objective To describe intensive care unit (ICU) discharge practices, examine factors associated with physicians discharge decisions, and explore ICU and hospital characteristics and clinical determinants associated with the discharge process.Design Survey in adult ICUs affiliated with the Swiss Society of Intensive Care Medicine.Interventions Questionnaire inquiring about ICU structure and organization mailed to 73 medical directors. Level of monitoring, intravenous medications, and physiological variables were proposed as elements of discharge decision. Five clinical situations were presented with request to assign a discharge disposition.Measurements and results Fifty-five ICUs participated, representing 75% of adult Swiss ICUs. Responsibility for patient management was assigned in 91% to the ICU team directing patient care. Only 22% of responding centers used written discharge guidelines. One-half of the respondents considered at least 10 of 15 proposed criteria to decide patient discharge. ICUs in central referral hospitals used fewer criteria than community and private hospitals. The availability of intermediate care units was significantly greater in university hospitals. The ICU directors level of experience was not associated with the number of criteria used. In the five clinical scenarios there was wide variation in discharge decision.Conclusions Our data indicate that there is marked heterogeneity in ICUs discharge practices, and that discharge decisions may be influenced by institutional factors. University teaching hospitals had more intermediate care facilities available. Written discharge guidelines were not widely used.Electronic Supplementary Material Electronic supplementary material to this paper can be obtained by using the Springer Link server located at This work was performed in the Division of Surgical Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesia, Pharmacology, and Surgical Intensive Care, University Hospitals, Geneva, SwitzerlandMembers of the Swiss ICU Network are listed in the Acknowledgments     

Characterizing critical care physician staffing in rural America: A description of Iowa intensive care unit staffing

Purpose

This study aimed to characterize intensive care unit (ICU) physician staffing patterns in a predominantly rural state.

Materials and Methods

A prospective telephone survey of ICU nurse managers in all Iowa hospitals with an ICU was conducted.

Results

Of 122 Iowa hospitals, 64 ICUs in 58 (48%) hospitals were identified, and 46 (72%) responded to the survey. Most ICUs (96%) used an open admission model and cared for undifferentiated medical and surgical patients (88%), and only 27% of open ICUs required critical care or pulmonary consultation for admitted patients. Most (59%) Iowa ICUs had a critical care physician or pulmonologist available, and high-intensity staffing was practiced in 30% of ICUs. Most physicians identified as practicing critical care (63%) were not board certified in critical care. Critical care physicians were available in a minority of hospitals routinely for inpatient intubation and cardiac arrest management (29% and 10%, respectively), and emergency physicians and other practitioners commonly responded to emergencies throughout the hospital.

Conclusions

Many Iowa hospitals have ICUs, and staffing patterns in Iowa ICUs mirror closely national staffing practices. Most ICUs are multispecialty, open ICUs in community hospitals. These factors should inform training and resource allocation for intensivists in rural states.     

A 6-y retrospective cohort study of family satisfaction with critical care and decision-making in an Australian intensive care unit

BackgroundPartnering with patients and families to make decisions about care needs is a safety and quality standard in Australian health services that is often not assessed systematically.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate satisfaction with care and involvement in decision-making among family members of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).MethodsA retrospective cohort analysis of a satisfaction survey administered to family members of patients admitted to an ICU in an Australian metropolitan tertiary care hospital from 2014 to 2019 was conducted. The Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit questionnaire (FSICU) questionnaire was used to assess overall satisfaction, satisfaction with care, and satisfaction with decision-making on a scale from “poor” (0) to “excellent” (100).ResultsIn total, 1322 family members fully completed the survey. Respondents were typically direct relatives of ICU patients (94.2%) with an average age of 52.6 years. Most patients had an ICU length of stay <7 d (56.8%), with most patients being discharged to the ward (96.8%). The overall mean satisfaction score was high among respondents (90.26%). Similarly, mean satisfaction with care (93.06%) and decision-making (89.71%) scores were high. Satisfaction with decision-making scores remained lower than satisfaction with care scores. Multivariable modeling indicated that those younger than 50 years reported higher satisfaction scores (p = 0.006) and those with prolonged lengths of stay in the ICU were associated with lower overall satisfaction scores (p = 0.039). Despite some criticism of waiting times and noise levels, responses showed sincere gratitude for patients’ treatment in the ICU and appreciation for the care, skill, and professionalism of the staff.ConclusionVery high satisfaction levels were reported by family members during this study. Routine, prospective evaluations of family member satisfaction with ICU experiences are feasible and can be leveraged to provide insight for clinicians and administrators seeking to improve family satisfaction with decision-making and care in ICU settings and meet national standards.     

Urinary catheter care in the intensive care unit

Urinary catheters are associated with a number of complications, and nurses are ideally suited to minimize the associated risks by utilizing the available research in their practice. Urine tract infections caused by urine catheters are associated with increased mortality; however, urine catheter care is a nursing procedure, the importance of which is sometimes overlooked. This study reviews recommended guidelines on urine catheter care and current published literature on the subject. The aim of the study was to identify recommended practice and compare it with the current research and literature to conclude best practice. Conclusions made from this study are that existing guidelines correspond to the recommendations and findings in recent research and literature. However, more detailed guidelines and further research on how to prevent catheter-associated urine tract infections and other complications may be of benefit.     

The relationship between person-centred care and the intensive care unit experience of critically ill patients: A multicentre cross-sectional survey

BackgroundPerson-centred care has the potential to improve the patient experience in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, the relationship between person-centred care perceived by critically ill patients and their ICU experience has yet to be determined.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between person-centred care and the ICU experience of critically ill patients.MethodsThis study was a multicentre, cross-sectional survey involving 19 ICUs of four university hospitals in Busan, Korea. The survey was conducted from June 2019 to July 2020, and 787 patients who had been admitted to the ICU for more than 24 hours participated. We measured person-centred care using the Person-Centered Critical Care Nursing perceived by Patient Questionnaire. Participants' ICU experience was measured by the Korean version of the Intensive Care Experience Questionnaire that consists of four subscales. We analysed the relationship between person-centred care and each area of the ICU experience using multivariate linear regression.ResultsPerson-centred care was associated with ‘awareness of surroundings’ (β = 0.29, p < .001), ‘frightening experiences’ (β = ?0.31, p < .001), and ‘satisfaction with care’ (β = 0.54, p < .001). However, there was no significant association between person-centred care and ‘recall of experience’.ConclusionsWe observed that person-centred care was positively related to most of the ICU experiences of critically ill patients except for recall of experience. Further studies on developing person-centred nursing interventions are needed.     

Costs and cost-effectiveness of a telemedicine intensive care unit program in 6 intensive care units in a large health care system

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to estimate the costs and cost-effectiveness of a telemedicine intensive care unit (ICU) (tele-ICU) program.

Materials and Methods

We used an observational study with ICU patients cared for during the pre-tele-ICU period and ICU patients cared for during the post-tele-ICU period in 6 ICUs at 5 hospitals that are part of a large nonprofit health care system in the Gulf Coast region. We obtained data on a sample of 4142 ICU patients: 2034 in the pre-tele-ICU period and 2108 in the post-tele-ICU period. Economic outcomes were hospital costs, ICU costs and floor costs, measured for average daily costs, costs per case, and costs per patient.

Results

After the implementation of the tele-ICU, the hospital daily cost increased from $4302 to $5340 (24%); the hospital cost per case, from $21 967 to $31 318 (43%); and the cost per patient, from $20 231 to $25 846 (28%). Although the tele-ICU intervention was not cost-effective in patients with Simplified Acute Physiology Score II 50 or less, it was cost-effective in the sickest patients with Simplified Acute Physiology Score II more than 50 (17% of patients) because it decreased hospital mortality without increasing costs significantly.

Conclusions

Hospital administrators may conclude that a tele-ICU program aimed at the sickest patients is cost-effective.     

A cross-sectional survey of critical care services in Sri Lanka: A lower middle-income country

Purpose

To describe the extent and variation of critical care services in Sri Lanka as a first step towards the development of a nationwide critical care unit (CCU) registry.

Materials and Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in all state CCUs by telephone or by visits to determine administration, infrastructure, equipment, staffing, and overall patient outcomes.

Results

There were 99 CCUs with 2.5 CCU beds per 100 000 population and 13 CCU beds per 1 000 hospital beds. The median number of beds per CCU was 5. The overall admissions were 194 per 100 000 population per year. The overall bed turnover was 76.5 per unit per year, with CCU mortality being 17%.Most CCUs were headed by an anesthetist. There were a total of 790 doctors (1.6 per bed), 1 989 nurses (3.9 per bed), and 626 health care assistants (1.2 per bed). Majority (87.9%) had 1:1 nurse-to-patient ratio, although few (11.4%) nurses had received formal intensive care unit training. All CCUs had basic infrastructure (electricity, running water, piped oxygen) and basic equipment (such as electronic monitoring and infusion pumps).

Conclusion

Sri Lanka, a lower middle-income country has an extensive network of critical care facilities but with inequalities in its distribution and facilities.     

Person-centred care among intensive care unit nurses: A cross-sectional study

ObjectivePractising person-centred care is crucial for nurses in the intensive care unit, as patients have high physical and psychological care needs. We aimed to identify the predictors of person-centred care among nurses working in intensive care settings.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, 188 intensive care unit nurses at four tertiary hospitals in two cities of South Korea were included. They completed self-reported questionnaires on emotional intelligence, compassion satisfaction, secondary traumatic stress, burnout, and person-centred care. Emotional intelligence was measured using the Korean version of the Wong and Law’s emotional intelligence scale. Compassion satisfaction, secondary traumatic stress, and burnout were measured by the Professional Quality of Life questionnaire (version 5). Person-centred care was measured using the person-centred critical care nursing scale.ResultsMultiple regression identified compassion satisfaction (β = 0.49, p <.001) as the most powerful predictor of person-centred care, followed by emotional intelligence (β = 0.21, p =.004) and intensive care unit career length (β = 0.17, p =.021). These three variables accounted for 31.0 % of the variance in person-centred care.ConclusionsThis study highlights the importance of career length, emotional intelligence, and compassion satisfaction in the promotion of person-centred care among intensive care unit nurses. Nursing management should contemplate specific measures to reduce turnover among experienced intensive care unit nurses and to enhance the factors that promote person-centred care, such as compassion satisfaction and emotional intelligence.