Pegylated-interferon alpha 2b and ribavirin for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation: From a Canadian experience to recommendations for therapy.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent hepatitis C (HCV) after liver transplantation (LT) is often more aggressive and treatments tend to be less successful. Pegylated-interferon and ribavirin are the standard of care for the treatment of HCV; however, there is limited published experience of its use after LT. OBJECTIVE: To report the results of pegylated-interferon alpha 2b (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin for the treatment of recurrent HCV after LT and compare the results with published data. METHODS: Thirteen patients with recurrent HCV were treated with PEG-IFN plus ribavirin. Liver biopsies demonstrated early-stage disease in eight patients and advanced fibrosis in five patients. The average starting dose of PEG-IFN was 0.91 microg/kg (range 0.5 microg/kg to 1.1 microg/kg) per week and ribavirin was started at 662 mg (range 0 mg to 1200 mg) per day. PEG-IFN treatment began an average of 24 months after LT (range six to 73 months). The dose of PEG-IFN was increased in four patients but only two reached 1.5 microg/kg. The ribavirin dose was increased in four, reduced in six and only seven patients reached a ribavirin dose greater than 10.6 mg/kg. RESULTS: A sustained virological response was seen in four of 13 (30.7%) patients and in four of eight (50%) patients with early-stage disease compared with zero of five patients with advanced fibrosis (P=0.1). Cytopenias were common and therapy was poorly tolerated in four of five patients with advanced fibrosis, including acute cellular rejection in three, renal failure in two, liver decompensation in four and death in three. CONCLUSIONS: Although a reasonable sustained virological response can be achieved with the use of PEG-IFN and ribavirin, the treatment is very poorly tolerated by patients with advanced-stage recurrent HCV. Treatment should be instituted before the development of significant fibrosis after LT.     

Interferon-Free Hepatitis C Treatment before and after Liver Transplantation: The Role of HCV Drug Resistance

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is one of the leading causes of end-stage liver disease and the main indication for liver transplantation (LT) in most countries. All patients who undergo LT with detectable serum HCV RNA experience graft reinfection progressing to cirrhosis within five years in 20% to 30% of them. Obtaining a sustained virological response (SVR) greatly improves overall and graft survival. Until 2011, standard antiviral therapy using PEGylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) was the only effective therapy, with an SVR rate around 30% in this setting. For patients infected with genotype 1, first generation NS3/4A protease inhibitors (PIs), boceprevir (BOC) or telaprevir (TVR), associated with PEG-IFN and RBV for 48 weeks have increased the SVR rates to 60% in non-transplant patients. However, tolerability and drug-drug interactions with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) are both limiting factors of their use in the liver transplant setting. Over recent years, the efficacy of antiviral C therapy has improved dramatically using new direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents without PEG-IFN and/or RBV, leading to SVR rates over 90% in non-transplant patients. Results available for transplant patients showed a better efficacy and tolerability and less drug-drug interactions than with first wave PIs. However, some infrequent cases of viral resistance have been reported using PIs or NS5A inhibitors pre- or post-LT that can lead to difficulties in the management of these patients.     

Management of Hepatitis C Before and After Liver Transplantation in the Era of Rapidly Evolving Therapeutic Advances

Management of hepatitis C (HCV) in liver transplantation (LT) population presents unique challenges. Suboptimal graft survival in HCV+ LT recipients is attributable to universal HCV recurrence following LT. Although eradication of HCV prior to LT is ideal for the prevention of HCV recurrence it is often limited by adverse events, particularly in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Antiviral therapy in LT candidates needs careful monitoring, and prophylaxis with HCV antibodies is ineffective. Early antiviral therapy after LT has been investigated, but no clear benefit has been demonstrated. Protocol liver biopsy is generally recommended in HCV+ LT recipients, and antiviral therapy can be considered in those with severe/progressive HCV recurrence. Sustained virological response (SVR) can be achieved in approximately 30% of LT recipients with pegylated interferon/ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) with survival benefit, but adverse effects are common. Favorable patient characteristics for response to therapy include non-1 genotype, previously untreated, low baseline HCV-RNA, and donor IL28B genotype CC. Direct acting antiviral (DAA)-based triple therapy is associated with higher rates of SVR, but with similar or slightly higher rates of side effects, and immunosuppressive regimens need to be closely monitored and adjusted during the treatment period. Notably, the safety and efficacy of HCV treatment are very likely to improve with newer generation DAA. The benefit of immunosuppressive strategy on the natural history HCV recurrence has not been well elucidated. Based upon available evidence, cyclosporine A (CSA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and sirolimus appear to have a neutral or small beneficial impact on HCV recurrence. Donor interleukin 28 B (IL28B) polymorphisms appear to impact the course and treatment outcomes in recurrent HCV. Retransplantation should be considered for patients with reasonable survival probability.     

Antiviral therapy of patients with decompensated cirrhosis to prevent recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS: After liver transplantation (LT) infection of the graft with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) is almost universal and chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis develop in a significant proportion of patients. One of the possible strategies to prevent HCV infection recurrence is to eradicate HCV before LT. METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of antiviral therapy to prevent HCV recurrence in 30 HCV-cirrhotic patients awaiting LT. At the time of inclusion 15 patients were Child-Pugh A and 15 Child-Pugh B/C. The infecting genotype was 1b in 25 patients. Treatment with interferon alpha-2b 3 MU/day and ribavirin 800 mg/day was initiated when the expected time for LT was less than 4 months and continued until LT. The median duration of treatment was 12 weeks. RESULTS: Nine patients (30%) achieved a virological response and 21 did not respond to therapy. In nine (43%) of the 21 non-responders viral load decreased > or =2 log10 during treatment. A viral load decrease > or = 2 log10 at week 4 of treatment was the strongest predictor of virological response. All nine virological responders have already undergone LT; six patients remain free of infection after a median follow-up of 46 weeks and HCV infection recurred in three patients after LT. In one of these patients HCV-RNA was still detectable in the explanted liver. Side effects were frequent and dose reduction was necessary in 19 (63%) of the 30 patients; no patient died while on therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the utilization of antiviral therapy in HCV-infected patients awaiting LT as one of the strategies to prevent hepatitis C recurrence after transplantation.     

Clinical trial results of peginterferons in combination with ribavirin

Of the large number of patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), only about one third have progressive liver disease, and will eventually develop cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. These are the patients for whom effective antiviral treatment is most needed. Therapy is currently recommended for patients with chronic hepatitis C who have abnormal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, detectable hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) in the blood, and significant necroinflammatory changes and/or fibrosis on liver biopsy. The current gold standard in terms of treatment efficacy is the combination of peginterferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin. The overall sustained virological response rate (SVR) with these regimens is 54 to 61% following 48 weeks of therapy. Patients with genotype 1 infection have a 42 to 51% likelihood of response to 48 weeks of therapy. Those with genotypes 2 or 3 infection will respond to 24 weeks of therapy in 78 to 82% of cases. These SVR rates are 5 to 10 percentage points higher in all patient groups than in those obtained with standard doses of interferon (IFN) and ribavirin. Retreatment of nonresponders to standard IFN monotherapy using PEG-IFN and ribavirin has achieved SVR rates of 34 to 40%. Retreatment of patients who relapsed after IFN monotherapy has resulted in an SVR rate of about 60%. A SVR after retreatment of relapsers and nonresponders with PEG-IFN and ribavirin is more likely in patients previously treated with IFN monotherapy, those with HCV genotypes 2 or 3, patients with low viral load (<2 million copies/mL), and individuals who had a significant decrease in HCV RNA levels during the initial treatment. The potential benefits of long-term anti-HCV suppressive therapy in nonresponders are currently under investigation.     

Plasma ribavirin concentrations during treatment of recurrent hepatitis C with peginterferon alpha-2b and ribavirin combination after liver transplantation

After liver transplantation (LT) for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis, recurrence of HCV infection is universal. The efficacy of antiviral therapy in this indication is usually reduced because of its poor tolerability. We present herein the results of plasma measurement of ribavirin levels in transplanted patients when using increasing dosage of ribavirin, in comparison with a control cohort of nontransplanted patients. Seventeen control patients (nine women and eight men, median age 51.5 years) were compared with 12 liver transplant patients (2 women and 10 men, median age 55 years). In 76% of patients, HCV infection was genotype 1. All patients were treated by a combination of ribavirin and pegylated-interferon alpha-2b. A total of 54 blood samples were taken (1.8 per patient) for ribavirin level measurement. A virological response was obtained in 8/17 patients in the control group and in 6/12 LT patients. Ribavirin dose was lower in the LT group (8.79 vs 12.98 mg/kg/day), but plasma levels were the same in both groups (2.23 vs 2.43 mg/L for LT and non-LT groups, respectively). This was probably related to impaired renal function in the LT group (serum creatinine: 112.6 vs 73.6 micromol/L). No discontinuation of ribavirin therapy was observed and haemoglobin level was the same in both groups (109.5 g/L in LT patients vs 119.5 g/L in the control group). These results strongly support the interest in plasma measurement of ribavirin concentration during antiviral therapy in LT patients. Ribavirin dosage might be adapted without compromising its efficacy.     

Hepatitis C virus cirrhosis: prolonged sustained virological response in a patient after low-dose antiviral treatment

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the most frequent cause of chronic liver disease in the western world. The 'gold standard' treatment of chronic HCV infection currently involves the administration of pegylated interferon alpha (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin. The success of this therapy is demonstrated by sustained virological responses (SVR). Randomized trials and practice guidelines have reported that compensated HCV cirrhosis is an indication for treatment with PEG-IFN and ribavirin, not only to obtain SVR but also to increase survival and to reduce the development of cirrhotic sequelae. In particular, the literature has reported that antiviral treatment was associated with histological improvement of fibrosis in cirrhotic patients with SVR. Recently, the same authors have evaluated the efficacy and safety of different doses of antiviral treatment in patients with chronic HCV infection. The use of interferon has been limited due to associated side effects, particularly in cirrhotic patients. Consequently, therapeutic decisions should be made on an individual basis. The Authors report a case of a patient with compensated HCV liver cirrhosis, with associated severe thrombocytopenia and oesophageal varices, in which the administration of antiviral therapy at a dose lower than the therapeutic 'gold standard' has achieved SVR and consequently improved clinical status.     

Treatment of Genotype 4 Hepatitis C Recurring After Liver Transplantation Using a Combination of Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin

Background

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) is universal and tends to be more aggressive. Data on post-transplant HCV genotype 4 treatment is scarce. The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of pegylated interferon alpha-2a (PEG-IFN) in combination with ribavirin in the treatment of recurrent HCV genotype 4 after LT.

Methods

Twenty-five patients infected with HCV genotype 4 were treated with PEG-IFN alpha-2a at a dose of 180 ??g/week in addition to 800 mg/day of ribavirin (the dose was adjusted within the tolerated range of 400?C1,200 mg). Pretreatment liver biopsies were obtained from all patients. Biochemical and virological markers were assessed before, during, and after treatment.

Results

Twenty-two patients (88%) achieved an early virological response (EVR) (12 patients tested negative for HCV-RNA). Fifteen (60%) and 14 patients (56%) achieved an end of treatment virological response (ETVR) and a sustained virological response (SVR), respectively. Five patients had advanced pretreatment liver fibrosis. Pretreatment ALT was elevated in 24 patients (96%). The most common adverse effects were flu-like symptoms and cytopenia. Eighteen patients (72%) required erythropoietin alpha and/or granulocyte-colony stimulating factor as a supportive measure. One patient developed severe rejection complicated by sepsis, renal failure, and death. Other adverse effects included depression, mild rejection, impotence, itching, and vitiligo.

Conclusions

Post-transplant treatment with pegylated interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin achieved SVR in 56% of liver transplant recipients with chronic HCV genotype 4 infection. The combination was relatively safe and exhibited a low rate of treatment withdrawal.     

Sustained virological response to antiviral therapy reduces mortality in HCV reinfection after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS: HCV infection recurs almost in all HCV-positive patients receiving liver transplantation and carries a poor prognosis. Aim of this study was to analyze efficacy and effect on survival of antiviral therapy in this clinical setting. METHODS: Pegylated-interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin were administered at a dose of 1 microg/kg of bwt weekly and 600-800 mg/day. Planned duration of treatment was 24 or 48 weeks according to HCV genotype. Patients who failed to respond at week 24 were considered as non-responders. RESULTS: 61 patients were enrolled. According to intention-to-treat analysis, 44 (72%) patients were considered as treatment failure (31 non-responders, 4 relapsers, 9 dropout). Sustained virological response was achieved in 17 cases (28%). Genotype 2, higher doses of antivirals and absence of histological cirrhosis were predictors of sustained virological response. In the follow up, patients with sustained virological response had a significantly lower mortality compared to patients with treatment failure (chi2=6.9; P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Response rate to antiviral therapy in HCV reinfection after liver transplantation is higher if a full dose of antiviral drugs is administered and if treatment starts before histological cirrhosis has developed. Sustained virological response improves patient survival.     

Long term histological improvement and clearance of intrahepatic hepatitis C virus RNA following sustained response to interferon-ribavirin combination therapy in liver transplanted patients with hepatitis C virus recurrence

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A proportion of liver transplanted patients with recurrent chronic hepatitis have a sustained virological response to combination therapy with interferon plus ribavirin. However, the long term benefit of antiviral therapy with regard to hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA clearance remains unknown in patients with HCV recurrence. This study examined the long term biochemical, virological, and histological outcome in transplanted patients with recurrent chronic hepatitis who had a sustained virological response to antiviral therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty four patients with recurrent hepatitis C were treated with antiviral therapy involving induction by combination therapy (interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin) for six months and maintenance ribavirin therapy for 12 months. Fourteen patients who had recurrent chronic hepatitis and sustained virological response to antiviral therapy were followed for three years after the end of antiviral therapy. Serum alanine aminotransferases were assessed every three months during the observation period. Serum hepatitis C RNA detected by polymerase chain reaction was evaluated every six months during follow up, and protocol biopsy procedures were performed routinely every year. Semiquantitative histopathological assessment of allograft hepatitis was performed using the Knodell score and HCV was also detected by polymerase chain reaction on frozen graft tissue samples. RESULTS: At the end of antiviral therapy, the sustained response rate was 26%. A complete response (normal serum alanine aminotransferase level and undetectable serum HCV RNA) was achieved in 13/14 (93%) patients three years after the end of treatment. A comparison of liver histology findings before and after a mean of three years after antiviral therapy showed a clear improvement in 12/14 (86%) patients. In 5/14 (36%) patients, the last biopsy showed normal or near normal histological findings. After three years of follow up, the total Knodell score was 3.2 (range 1-8) versus 8.3 (range 5-12) before treatment (p=0.001). Graft HCV RNA was detectable before treatment in all 14 patients and was undetectable at the end of follow up in 13/14 (93%) patients tested. CONCLUSION: In patients with biochemical and virological responses induced by ribavirin and interferon, a complete response was sustained in 93% for at least three years after cessation of therapy. This long term response was associated with absence of detectable intrahepatic hepatitis C RNA and marked histological improvement.     

Pegylated alpha-interferon-2a plus ribavirin compared with pegylated alpha-interferon-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus: prospective, non-randomized study

Background and Aim:  We assessed whether the two regimens of pegylated α-interferon-2b (PEG-IFN-α2b) plus ribavirin and pegylated α-interferon-2a (PEG-IFN-α2a) plus ribavirin showed differences in terms of sustained virological response, withdrawal due to side-effects and dose adjustment requirements in the treatment of naive chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients.
Methods:  A prospective non-randomized, open-label comparison was made of naive HCV-infected patients undergoing standard 24- or 48-week treatment with two PEG-IFN combined with weight-based dosing regimen of ribavirin (PEG-IFN-α2a/ribavirin, n  = 91; PEG-IFN-α2b/ribavirin, n  = 92).
Results:  Sustained virological response was similar in PEG-IFN-α2a and PEG-IFN-α2b (65.9% vs 62%, P  = 0.64), without differences according to genotype. In 117 patients with HCV genotype 1, the corresponding rates were 50.8% versus 46.6% ( P  = 0.713). Rapid virological response at 4 weeks, early virological response at 12 weeks and transient virological response were also similar. In the multivariate analysis, HCV genotype (odds ratio [OR] = 0.076, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.029–0.198, P  = 0.000) and presence of steatosis in the liver biopsy (OR = 2.799, 95% CI 1.362–5.755, P  = 0.005) were significantly associated with response to antiviral therapy. The rate of withdrawals due to treatment-related adverse events was 13.2% in the group of PEG-IFN-α2a and 10.9% in the group of PEG-IFN-α2b. Dose modification of PEG-IFN was necessary in eight patients given PEG-IFN-α2a and in seven given PEG-IFN-α2b.
Conclusion:  The two PEG-IFN plus ribavirin have comparable anti-HCV activity as shown by similar percentages of patients with sustained virological response.     

Hepatitis C virus reinfection after liver transplantation: Is there a role for direct antiviral agents?

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection following liver transplantation (LT) is almost universal and can accelerate graft cirrhosis in up to 30% of patients. The development of effective strategies to treat or prevent HCV recurrence after LT remains a major challenge, considering the shortage of donor organs and the accelerated progression of HCV in LT recipients. Standard antiviral therapy with pegylated-interferon plus ribavirin is the current treatment of choice for HCV LT recipients, even though the combination is not as effective as it is in immunocompetent patients. A sustained virological response in the setting of LT improves patient and graft survival, but this is only achieved in 30%-45% of patients and the treatment is poorly tolerated. To improve the efficacy of pre- and post-transplant antiviral therapy, a new class of potent direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) has been developed. The aim of this review is to summarize the use of DAAs in LT HCV patients. PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and clinical trial databases were searched for this purpose. To date, only three clinical studies on the topic have been published and most of the available data are in abstract form. Although a moderately successful early virological response has been reported, DAA treatment regimens were associated with severe toxicity mitigating their potential usefulness. Moreover, the ongoing nature of data, the lack of randomized studies, the small number of enrolled patients and the heterogeneity of these studies make the results largely anecdotal and questionable. In conclusion, large well-designed clinical studies on DAAs in HCV LT patients are required before these drugs can be recommended after transplantation.     

丙型肝炎各级肝硬化患者的抗病毒治疗策略

丙型肝炎病毒（HCV）感染是引起肝硬化、终末期肝病以及肝细胞癌的重要原因。慢性丙型肝炎的标准化治疗方案———聚乙二醇化干扰素α联合利巴韦林已取得了良好的效果,但进展至肝硬化尤其是失代偿期的患者多难以耐受干扰素的不良反应,给抗病毒治疗带来困难。面对我国丙型肝炎肝硬化比例较高、肝移植实施困难、对标准的抗病毒治疗方案应答率高的特点,参考国际指南,作者在国内率先探索和提出了丙型肝炎肝硬化分级标准及相应的抗病毒治疗策略,并进行了相关的临床研究和应用。依据作者提出的丙型肝炎肝硬化的分级方法,先采取不同的处置方法缓解脾亢或减少副作用后,再采用标准化抗病毒治疗方案,可以有效地延缓肝硬化的进展,减少HCV感染相关并发症,最终提高患者生活质量。     

Triple therapy with boceprevir or telaprevir for prior HCV non-responders

Approximately 170 million people are infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) worldwide. Sustained virological response (SVR) is equivalent to viral eradication and associated with a reduction in the risk of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The treatment for genotype 1 HCV chronic infection is the addition of a protease inhibitor (telaprevir or boceprevir) to the pegylated-interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) regimen. Treatment of genotype 1 naïve chronic hepatitis C with PEG-IFN and ribavirin (RBV) for 48 weeks results in SVR in approximately 40% of patients. Retreatment of previous relapsers to PEG-IFN/RBV therapy with triple therapy, a protease inhibitor (telaprevir or boceprevir), plus PEG-IFN and RBV results in SVR in more than 70% of cases. However, retreatment of previous non-responders to PEG-IFN/RBV therapy with these triple therapies, results in SVR in less than 30% of cases. The aim of this review is to summarize results obtained with Boceprevir or Telaprevir triple therapy for prior HCV experienced patients (non-responders and relapsers).     

Pegylated interferon-alpha2a/ribavirin treatment of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Abstract: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection invariably recurs after liver transplantation (LT), leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Although the combination of pegylated interferon-alpha (IFN-α)/ribavirin is the preferred treatment for these patients, the optimal schedule remains undetermined. In an uncontrolled trial, 19 patients with HCV infection recurring after LT received pegylated IFN-α_2a, 180 μg weekly, and ribavirin, 10 mg/kg body weight daily, for 48 weeks. The proportion of patients with undetectable HCV RNA in their serum after 12 weeks of treatment was 53%. Five patients (26%) dropped out of the study due to intolerance (in 2 cases), depression (in 1), or infectious complications (in 2). A sustained virological response (SVR), defined as undetectable serum HCV RNA 24 weeks after the end of treatment, was observed in 9/19 patients (47%). SVR was associated with an early virological response after 12 weeks of therapy ( P <0.001) and a treatment duration >80% ( P =0.02), but not with baseline HCV RNA level or a cumulative dose of pegylated IFN-α_2a or ribavirin >80% of the scheduled dose. All 4 patients with genotype 2 or 3 reached SVR, as compared with 33% of patients with genotype 1 or 4 ( P =0.03). A 48-week course of pegylated IFN-α_2a/ribavirin therapy is effective in patients with recurrent HCV infection after LT.     

Hepatitis C virus antiviral therapy in patients with cirrhosis

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is generally a slowly progressive disease. A minority of infected patients, however, eventually will develop cirrhosis and its life-threatening complications.Recent development of combination interferon (IFN) and ribavirin(RBV) antiviral therapy has changed the approach to patients infected with the virus. Once cirrhosis develops, treatment is a difficult task and should be done with close monitoring because of numerous adverse effects. In patients with compensated cirrhosis,combination therapy is the most efficient approach and offers the highest sustained virological response. Although data are limited,no significant differences have been reported between the use of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and standard IFN in combination with RBV. Moreover, PEG-IFN has a higher risk of hematological complications, and this should be considered when using in advanced disease. Antiviral therapy for patients with decompensated cirrhosis should be used only in a clinical trial setting because of reported severe adverse effects. After liver transplantation, combination therapy may be an alternative for a limited number of patients.Although definitive recommendations cannot be made because of limited studies, there is a group of very well compensated patients with HCV and cirrhosis who benefited from treatment by clinicians well versed in the use of combination therapy.     

Three patients treated with sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

We previously reported results of interferon (IFN)-free daclatasvir and asunaprevir for the treatment of recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection after liver transplantation (LT). Here we report three patients who achieved viral response with no effect on the blood concentrations of immunosuppressive agents following sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir treatment. The first patient was a 68-year-old female with HCV-related liver cirrhosis who failed to respond to pegylated-IFN and ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) after living donor LT. She had been treated with 50 mg/day of cyclosporine. The second was a 63-year-old male with HCV-related liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma who failed to respond to PEG-IFN/RBV after living donor LT. He had been treated with 50 mg/day of cyclosporine. The third was a 63-year-old female with HCV-related liver cirrhosis. She had been treated with tacrolimus. High alanine aminotransferase levels persisted after LT. Liver biopsy examination revealed active hepatitis or chronic rejection. Therefore, sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir therapy was started. However, the combination treatment was stopped at 4 weeks due to development of interstitial pneumonia. Serum HCV RNA became negative at the time treatment was discontinued and remained negative 12 weeks after cessation of therapy in all three cases. Sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir treatment showed a remarkable viral response with little effect on blood levels of immunosuppressive agents for recurrent HCV genotype 1 infection after LT.     

Response of TT virus to IFN plus ribavirin treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C

AIM: TT virus (TTV) is a newly described DNA virus related to postransfusion hepatitis that produces persistent viremia in the absence of clinical manifestations. PEG-IFN plus ribavirin have been useful in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection. This study investigated the responses ofTT virus(TTV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) to PEG-IFN plus ribavirin therapy. METHODS: Fifteen patients infected with HCV were treated with PEG-IFN(0.5 μg/body weight/week) and ribavirin(1 000 mg-1 200 mg/daily) for 48 weeks. Blood samples were drawn at the beginning and the end of the therapy. Serum TTV DNA and HCV RNA were quantified by real time PCR. RESULTS: At the beginning of treatment, TIV infection was detected in 10/15 (66.6%) of HCV-infected patients. Loss of serum Trv DNA at the end of therapy occurred in 6/10(60%) patients. Out of these 6 patients, 4 (67%) became positive for TTV DNA after 6 months of therapy. Regarding HCV viremia, 11/15 (73%) patients were negative for serum HCV RNA after 48 weeks of therapy, 7/11 (64%) of these cases also became negative for TTV DNA following the combined treatment. In the 3/4 (75%) patients who were positive for HCV RNA at the end of therapy, TTV DNA was detected as well. Sustained HCV response at 6 months after treatment was 53% (8/15). CONCLUSION: No TTV sustained response can be achieved in any patient after PEG-IFN plus ribavirin administration.     

An extended treatment protocol with pegylated interferon and ribavirin for hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation

AIM: To evaluate the efflicacy and tolerability of an extended treatment protocol and to determine the predictors of sustained virological response (SVR) after liver transplantation (LT).METHODS: Between August 2005 and November 2008, patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) after LT were selected for treatment if liver biopsy showed at least grade 2 inflammation and/or stage 2 flibrosis. All patients were to receive pegylated interferon (PEG)/regimens combining ribavirin (RBV) for an additional 48 wk after HCV undetectability.RESULTS: Extended protocol treatment was initiated in thirty patients. Overall, 73% had end of treatmentresponse and 60% had SVR. Nineteen patients completed treatment per protocol, of them, sixteen (84%) had end of treatment response, and fourteen (74%) achieved SVR. Both early virological response and 24-week virological response were individually associated with SVR but this association was not signif icant on multivariate analysis. Eleven patients (37%) discontinued therapy due to adverse effects. Cytopenias were the most common and most severe adverse effect, and required frquent growth factor use, dose adjustments and treatment cessations. The risk of rejection was not increased.CONCLUSION: Recurrent HCV after LT can be safely treated with extended virological responseguided therpy using PEG/RBV, but requires close monitoring for treatment-related adverse effects, particularly cytopenias.     

Evolution of biomarkers of liver fibrosis and liver insufficiency in hepatitis C virus-infected patients treated with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin and rituximab

Therapeutic options in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related vasculitis may target the viral trigger using antiviral therapy [pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV)], and/or the downstream B-cell arm of autoimmunity with rituximab (RTX). To date, no study has compared the efficacy of RTX combined with PEG-IFN/RBV on biomarkers of liver insufficiency in patients with severe liver fibrosis. Twenty-eight untreated HCV-related vasculitis patients with severe liver fibrosis (Metavir F3-F4) were included: 14 patients received RTX plus PEG-IFN/RBV and 14 patients PEG-IFN/RBV. The main clinical and biological data were recorded and compared at baseline, month 3 (M3), M12 and M24 of follow-up. Baseline epidemiological, clinical, virological and immunological features were similar between the groups. The virological response did not differ between cases and controls. The alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level and HCV viral load did not increase in patients treated with RTX. Serum albumin levels increased in patients treated with RTX at M3 and M6 (108% and 111% of baseline value; P = 0.06 and P = 0.13), whereas it was stable in patients treated without RTX. FibroTest values decreased from 0.70 at baseline to 0.59 at M3 (P = 0.5) and returned to 0.69 at M24 in the RTX-PEG-IFN/RBV group, whereas they were stable in the PEG-IFN/RBV group. RTX is safe in patients with severe HCV liver fibrosis and vasculitis. No beneficial effects of RTX were evidenced on liver fibrosis progression, but we found interesting correlations with the serum albumin level, FibroTest values and B-cell count.