Predictors of patient selection in bariatric surgery

OBJECTIVE: To identify sociodemographic and clinical predictors of patient selection in bariatric surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Population-based studies suggest that bariatric surgery patients are disproportionately privately insured, middle-aged white women. It is uncertain whether such disparities are due to surgeon decisions to operate, differences among morbidly obese individuals in access to surgery, or patients' personal preferences regarding surgical treatment. METHODS: We conducted a national survey of 1343 U.S. bariatric surgeons. The questionnaire contained clinical vignettes generated using a balanced fractional factorial design. For each of 3 hypothetical patients unique in age, race, gender, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, social support, functional status, and insurance, respondents were asked if they would operate. Logistic regression was used to determine the odds of selection for each characteristic while controlling for the other 7 characteristics. Subset analyses were also performed using combinations of BMI and comorbidities. RESULTS: A total of 62.5% of eligible surgeons responded (n = 820). Patient race did not influence surgeon decisions to operate. Hypothetical patient age, BMI, and social support were most influential. In the subgroup of patients who did not meet current NIH BMI and comorbidity criteria for bariatric surgery, male sex (odds ratio [OR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.76) was associated with decreased odds of selection. Overall, younger age (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.07-0.11), older age (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.90), limited functional status (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52-0.82), poor social support (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.30-0.47), self-pay (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57-0.91), and public insurance (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.43-0.67) were associated with decreased odds of selection. BMI and comorbidity criteria influenced the magnitude of these effects. CONCLUSIONS: Patient race did not play a role in surgeon decisions to operate. Further research should examine the roles of unequal access to bariatric surgery and differing socio-cultural perceptions of morbid obesity on racial disparities. The influence of patient age, gender, insurance status, social support, and functional status on decisions to operate was mitigated by BMI and comorbidities. Policy-makers currently debating BMI and comorbidity criteria for bariatric surgery should also consider guidelines pertaining to these sociodemographic issues that influence patient selection in bariatric surgery.     

Financial impact of improving patient care setting selection after bariatric surgery

BackgroundPotentially avoidable emergency department (ED) visits are a significant source of excess healthcare spending. Despite improvement in postoperative readmissions, 20% of bariatric surgery patients use the ED postoperatively. Many of these visits may be appropriately managed in lower-acuity centers.ObjectiveWe sought to evaluate the economic impact of shifting potentially avoidable ED visits after bariatric surgery to lower-acuity centers.SettingStatewide quality improvement collaborative.MethodsWe performed an observational study of patients who underwent bariatric surgery between 2011 and 2017 using a linked data registry, including clinical data from a large-quality improvement collaborative and payment data from a statewide value collaborative. Postoperative ED visits and readmission rates were determined. Ninety-day ED and urgent care center (UCC) visit claims were matched to a clinical registry. Price-standardized payments for UCC and ED visits without admission were compared.ResultsAmong the 36,071 patients who underwent bariatric surgery, 8.4% presented to the ED postoperatively. Approximately 50% of these visits resulted in readmission. Three hundred eighty-eight ED visits without readmission (i.e., potentially avoidable ED visits) and 110 UCC encounters with claims data were identified. Triaging a potentially avoidable ED visit to an UCC would generate a savings of $4238 per patient, reducing spending in this cohort by $1.6 million.ConclusionShifting potentially avoidable ED visits after bariatric surgery could result in significant cost savings. Efforts to improve patients’ selection of healthcare setting and increase utilization of lower-acuity centers may serve as a template for appropriately meeting the needs of patients and containing spending after bariatric surgery.     

Reoperative antireflux surgery.

Antireflux surgery is a successful procedure in the treatment of severe gastroesophageal reflux disease. During this procedure, if the following four elements are observed, (1) adequate mobilization of the distal esophagus into the abdomen without tension, (2) construction of an appropriate fundoplication, (3) closure of the diaphragmatic crura, and (4) anchoring of the esophagogastric junction and fundoplication in the abdomen, the patient can be expected to achieve an excellent outcome from either a primary or a secondary antireflux operation.     

Lessons learned from modern military surgery

The era of global terrorism and asymmetric warfare heralded by the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States have blurred the traditional lines between civilian and military trauma. The lessons learned by physicians in the theaters of war, particularly regarding the response to mass casualties, blast and fragmentation injuries, and resuscitation of casualties in austere environments, likely resonate strongly with civilian trauma surgeons in the current era. The evolution of a streamlined trauma system in the theaters of operations, the introduction of an in-theater institution review board process, and dedicated personnel to collect combat casualty data have resulted in improved data capture and realtime, on-the-scene research.     

Reoperative aortic surgery.

The presentation of long-term complications after conventional aortic surgery and the treatment of patients that have had reoperative aortic operations are reviewed. Ninety-seven consecutive patients that had 102 subsequent aortic operations at a tertiary referral center were studied. Presenting symptoms, demographics, risk factors, indications for initial and second procedures, operative techniques and outcomes were recorded in a computerized database. There were 70 men and 27 women studied, with an average age of 64 years. First operations were performed primarily for aneurysm (56%) and occlusive disease (44%). The interval between procedures ranged up to 23 years, with a mean of 6 years. Indications for reoperation were subsequent aneurysm (65), graft occlusions (25) and/or infections (24). Seventy-three percent of the subsequent aneurysms were true metachronous aneurysms; the others were associated with the graft or an anastomosis. Para-anastomotic aneurysms may be more common with a primary end-to-side graft configuration. One-third of subsequent aneurysms were not palpable and asymptomatic. Graft occlusion can be treated safely with elective repeat bypass (mortality 0%). Graft infections that require total graft removal remain a challenging problem (mortality 17%). Although surgical approach for reoperations utilized more extensive exposure and proximal clamping, 59 elective aneurysm cases had a 5.1% mortality rate; eight emergent procedures for ruptured aneurysms resulted in 88% mortality. Reoperation for graft occlusion or infection showed a similar high mortality rate with emergent cases. In this referral practice, graft occlusion and infection are relatively less frequent, whereas metachronous aneurysm formation is now the most common indication for reoperation. These aneurysms often remain undetected until symptoms occur; frank rupture is usually lethal. As elective repair with modern reoperative techniques can be safely performed, routine computed tomographic examination is advisable at least every 5 years after aortic operations.     

Reoperative thyroid surgery.

BACKGROUND. Patients with thyroid cancer are sometimes denied repeat thyroid operations for fear of an increased risk of complications. METHODS. We therefore reviewed our experience in 114 patients with benign or malignant thyroid tumors who underwent 116 thyroid reoperations with or without other procedures. All patients had undergone at least one prior thyroid operation and 16 patients had undergone from two to four thyroid operations before referral. The initial histologic diagnosis before reoperation was thyroid carcinoma in 79 patients, papillary carcinoma in 47 patients, follicular carcinoma in 17 patients, medullary carcinoma in 9 patients, and Hürthle cell carcinoma in 6 patients. Benign disease was present in 35 patients. In 62 patients with cancer, reoperations were performed because of suspected persistent or recurrent disease; one of these patients underwent two reoperations by us. In 17 patients reoperation was to complete total thyroidectomy, primarily so that radioactive iodine could be used to scan for and treat metastatic disease. RESULTS. Among the 116 reoperations, 102 were completion total thyroidectomy, 8 were near-total or subtotal thyroidectomy, and 6 were completion lobectomy. Histologic examination at reoperation revealed thyroid carcinoma in 51 cases (64%) among the 79 patients who had undergone 80 operations for previous thyroid cancer. Recurrent or persistent cancer was present in 49 of 63 (78%) reoperations for patients with papillary, medullary, and Hürthle cell cancer but in only 2 of 17 (12%) patients with follicular cancer. Cancer also occurred in 8 cases (22%) of the 36 reoperations in 35 patients who initially had benign lesions. Complications included one permanent and one transient palsy of the recurrent laryngeal nerve; both occurred on the side of a previous partial or subtotal lobectomy. Other complications included temporary hypoparathyroidism in four patients, seromas in two patients, and a keloid in one patient. CONCLUSIONS. This study documents that reoperations can be performed with minimal morbidity. Thus patients should not be denied the chance to undergo removal of a persistent tumor or the remnant normal thyroid tissue because of the fear of complications.     

Reoperative parathyroid surgery.

Reoperative parathyroid surgery is associated with a high mortality and morbidity. Morbidity consists of uncorrected hypercalcemia, hypoparathyroidism, and recurrent nerve injury. Initial operative failure is most frequently a result of not identifying four parathyroid glands. On reoperation, parathyroid glands are most often found in the neck and are usually hyperplastic. It is recommended that before attempting rexploration for parathyroid disease, all the patient's records especially the operative note and the previous pathology material should be reviewed. Preoperative localization by selective venous catheterization is of great use in the management of this type of patient.     

Perioperative and 1-year outcomes of bariatric surgery in septuagenarians: implications for patient selection

BackgroundAlthough bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for obesity, utilization of bariatric procedures in older adults remains low. Previous work reported higher morbidity in older patients undergoing bariatric surgery. However, the generalizability of these data to contemporary septuagenarians is unclear.ObjectivesWe sought to evaluate differences in 30-day outcomes, 1-year weight loss, and co-morbidity remission after bariatric surgery among 3 age groups as follows: <45 years, 45–69 years, and ≥70 years.SettingStatewide quality improvement collaborative.MethodsUsing a large quality improvement collaborative, we identified patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) between 2006 and 2018. We used multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate the association between age cohorts and 30-day outcomes, 1-year weight loss, and co-morbidity remission.ResultsWe identified 641 septuagenarians who underwent SG (68.5%) or RYGB (31.5%). Compared with 45–69 year olds, septuagenarians had higher rates of hemorrhage (5.1% versus 3.1%; P = .045) after RYGB and higher rates of leak/perforation (.9% versus .3%; P = .044) after SG. Compared with younger patients, septuagenarians lost less of their excess weight, losing 64.8% after RYGB and 53.8% after SG. Remission rates for diabetes and obstructive sleep were similar for patients aged ≥70 years and 45–69 years.ConclusionsBariatric surgery in septuagenarians results in substantial weight loss and co-morbidity remission with an acceptable safety profile. Surgeons with self-imposed age limits should consider broadening their selection criteria to include patients ≥70 years old.     

Development of quality indicators: lessons learned in bariatric surgery

Quality indicators will likely be used in comprehensive surgical quality assessment and improvement programs. Quality indicators are the actions equated with good quality of care. As a case example, bariatric surgery quality indicators were developed using evidence in the literature combined with formal expert opinion validation. Qualitative analysis was performed to identify the critical thematic issues surrounding development of these surgical quality indicators. Researchers identified five major thematic categories during the development process. These included feasibility in medical records (availability, ease of abstraction, and cost), the number of indicators developed (optimal number), the lack of evidence in the literature (weight on expert opinion), structural versus process indicators, and linkage to outcomes (need to demonstrate that adherence to indicators is associated with better outcomes). This project, using bariatric surgery as an example, uncovered important issues that need to be addressed when developing quality assessment and quality improvement programs for evaluating surgical quality. As quality indicators will likely be developed and used increasingly, future projects in this regard will benefit from these lessons.     

Disaster management. Lessons learned

Our experiences have taught us that practice makes perfect and that it probably is unreasonable to expect everything to be orderly, sane, and appropriate during disaster management. The best we can hope for probably is controlled chaos. We do believe that we have generated an improved plan, that the plan is known, and that it is being revised continuously. We can no longer rely on our goodwill and good intentions to manage mass casualties in a disaster. There are too many factors that can reduce our ability to provide medical care in this situation. Hospital planning is essential. The hospital should be represented on the emergency preparedness committee so it is knowledgeable about the various plans throughout the city. Each plan must be practiced and critiqued to identify potential problems. Hospital staff must be kept current on the various plans to understand the communication, authority, responsibility, security, and medical control for each plan. We have instituted a video program outlining the various tasks for each hospital department for each disaster plan. This format allows the personnel in these departments to review their responsibilities continually in a concise manner and allows practice of disaster preparedness without implementing an entire disaster drill. Table 1 provides a quick review of the areas and questions we found to be problems when implementing our disaster plan.     

Obesity and considerations in the bariatric surgery patient

Morbid obesity is a worldwide pandemic. Medical problems associated with being obese include hypertension, diabetes, pulmonary restrictive disease, obstructive sleep apnea, and increased risk of cancer. In addition, there is a tremendous financial burden on society and the health care system to take care of these individuals. Bariatric surgery has proved to be a safe, effective means of sustained weight loss, which can lead to improvement or resolution of obesity-related medical conditions. Individuals who are morbidly obese represent a unique population requiring special consideration when presenting for medical care.     

Reoperative surgery for periampullary adenocarcinoma.

In recent years, the morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival of patients undergoing surgery for periampullary adenocarcinoma have improved. These changes have prompted us to reoperate on patients who have previously undergone pancreatobiliary surgery, many of whom were initially considered to have unresectable lesions. From 1979 to 1990, 38 patients with pancreatic and 17 patients with nonpancreatic periampullary adenocarcinoma underwent reexploratory surgery at The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md. Thirty-three (60%) of these 55 patients had resection at the time of second laparotomy. Of the 46 patients undergoing reexploratory surgery with an intent to resect, the overall resection rate was 72% (33), 64% (16/25) for pancreatic and 100% for nonpancreatic periampullary adenocarcinoma. Postoperative complications occurred in 21 patients (38%), but only one patient (2%) died following surgery. Mean survivals from reexploratory surgery were 6.9 months for the 22 patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing palliative surgery, 20.5 months for the 16 patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, and 33.0 months for the 17 patients with nonpancreatic periampullary adenocarcinoma undergoing resection. We conclude that in carefully selected patients, reoperative surgery for periampullary cancer (1) provides a significant resection rate, (2) can be performed safely, and (3) offers a chance for long-term survival.     

Revisional bariatric surgery in a transplant patient

IntroductionA BMI of over 35–45 kg/m2 is deemed the upper limit for considering a patient for a renal transplant. Voluntary weight loss attempts are a major concern for patients while on hemodialysis, however, bariatric surgeries have opened up a new door to notable weight loss results, even demonstrating significant improvements of patients’ diabetic profile and hypertension.Case reportCase of a 52-year-old male with a BMI of 42 in end-stage renal disease, that needed a kidney transplant but was ineligible to be placed on the waiting list due to his weight. A laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) was performed to aid with his weight loss. He also showed major improvements in his hypertension and diabetes profiles. The patient started gaining weight as well as showing deterioration in his diabetic control. He underwent the renal transplant 1.5 years post LSG, after which he showed improvements in his blood results, diabetic and hypertensive control. However, his weight began to increase again, for which he underwent gastric bypass. Since then, the patients' glucose, BUN and creatinine have normalized and his weight continued to drop, reaching a BMI of 31.83 kg/m2 2 years post bypass.ConclusionBariatric surgery is a safe and effective procedure to assist renal transplant patients in losing weight. In addition, it has proven to be effective in the management of the co-morbidities that are associated with renal failure. Our study was also able to prove that converting form an SG to a bypass in a transplant patient is a safe and feasible option.     

Criteria for selection of patients for bariatric surgery

Because of the high prevalence of co-morbid conditions and poor life expectancy a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 40 kg/m(2) or more is an indication for surgery in a fully informed, consenting adult in optimal medical condition to tolerate general anaesthesia. Patients with BMI of 35-40 kg/m(2) and the existence of one or more serious obesity-related conditions ameliorated by weight loss, such as hypertension, pulmonary insufficiency, non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus etc., are also candidates for surgical treatment. The bariatric surgeon should use these international criteria as guidelines only, not strict rules. Attempts on the part of internists and more frequently insurance carriers to require documented failure of previous non-operative treatment is not meaningful.