腹腔镜手术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎28例

穿孔性阑尾炎以往多采用开腹阑尾切除术。该方法创伤较大,并发症多,病人恢复时间长。随着腹腔镜技术不断提高,腹腔镜阑尾切除治疗穿孔性阑尾炎逐渐在临床推广。我院2004年2月至2008年6月,共收治急性阑尾炎573例,其中因阑尾穿孔手术48例,腹腔镜下阑尾切除治疗穿孔性阑尾炎28例,现报道如下。     

不同手术方法治疗小儿穿孔性阑尾炎的效果及对炎症应激反应和免疫功能的影响

目的:探究腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统开腹手术治疗小儿穿孔性阑尾炎的效果及对炎症应激反应和免疫功能的影响.方法:选择2017年1月至2020年1月在西南医科大学附属医院进行治疗的穿孔性阑尾炎患儿100例,根据不同手术方式分为对照组52例、观察组48例.对照组采用传统开腹手术进行阑尾切除,观察组采用腹腔镜阑尾切除术.对比2组手...     

应用微型腹腔镜手术技术治疗阑尾炎

目的了解应用微型腹腔镜手术技术治疗阑尾炎的效果,探讨本术式的优点,评估其临床应用价值.方法应用微型腹腔镜手术技术为28例阑尾炎病人进行治疗,追踪并分析其效果.结果全部病人被治愈,住院时间4天,本组无术后出血,伤口感染等并发症,一个月后手术疤痕消失或不明显.结论微型腹腔镜阑尾切除手术效果良好,手术损伤达到最小,并发症最少,是优点最多的治疗阑尾炎的一种术式.     

应用微型腹腔镜手术技术治疗阑尾炎

目的了解应用微型腹腔镜手术技术治疗阑尾炎的效果 ,探讨本术式的优点 ,评估其临床应用价值 .方法应用微型腹腔镜手术技术为 2 8例阑尾炎病人进行治疗 ,追踪并分析其效果 .结果全部病人被治愈 ,住院时间 4天 ,本组无术后出血 ,伤口感染等并发症 ,一个月后手术疤痕消失或不明显 .结论微型腹腔镜阑尾切除手术效果良好 ,手术损伤达到最小 ,并发症最少 ,是优点最多的治疗阑尾炎的一种术式 .     

腹腔镜和开腹手术治疗化脓性阑尾炎的对比研究

目的探讨腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗化脓性阑尾炎的临床应用价值。方法回顾分析113例化脓性阑尾炎的手术治疗病例,其中行腹腔镜阑尾切除术61例（LA组）,行开腹阑尾切除术52例（OA组）。比较两组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、术后疼痛程度、术后住院时间、切口感染率和住院费用。结果 LA组中有4例中转开腹。LA组的住院费用和术中出血量高于OA组（P〈0.05）,术后疼痛程度和切口感染率较OA组低（P〈0.05）。两组患者在手术时间、术后住院时间和术后肛门排气时间的差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。结论腹腔镜和开腹手术治疗化脓性阑尾炎各有优势,临床工作中应根据患者具体病情和医师的手术经验合理选用。     

对比腹腔镜和开腹阑尾切除术在治疗穿孔性阑尾炎中的手术效果

目的：探讨对比腹腔镜和开腹阑尾切除术在治疗穿孔性阑尾炎中的手术效果。方法选取我院2010年5月~2013年5月收治的60例阑尾炎患者，将患者随机分为观察组和对照组各30例，对对照组进行传统开腹阑尾切除手术治疗，对观察组给予腹腔镜下阑尾炎切除术治疗，比较两组患者手术时间、住院时间、手术中的出血量以及手术并发症的发生率。结果观察组平均手术时间比对照组更短，手术中出血量更少，两组差异具有统计学意义，P<0.05。观察组并发症发生明显少于对照组，P<0.05。两组患者手术时间差异没有统计学意义，P>0.05。结论腹腔镜下阑尾炎切除术与传统阑尾切除术的临床疗效更好，所造成的创伤更小，手术后患者恢复更快，并发症发生率更低，值得临床推广。     

腹腔镜阑尾切除术手术技巧探讨

目的探讨腹腔镜阑尾切除术手术技巧,提高腹腔镜阑尾切除手术技能。方法回顾性分析2009年2月至2010年5月施行的161例腹腔镜阑尾切除术,总结腹腔镜阑尾切除手术处理的方法要点。结果 161例腹腔镜阑尾切除术均成功完成,无一例发生副损伤及并发症。结论随着腹腔镜技术提高和经验积累,只要掌握了腹腔镜阑尾切除术的手术技巧可以安全可靠地完成手术,并且能够最大程度地减少并发症。     

腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效研究

目的:观察急性阑尾炎患者采取三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗的有效性和安全性.方法:回顾性收集本院在2022 年1 月至2023 年2 月期间收治的行阑尾切除术治疗的 84 例急性阑尾炎患者的临床资料,按照阑尾切除术治疗方法的不同,将 84 例患者分为对照组(采取开腹阑尾切除术,41 例)和研究组(采取三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术,43 例).分析比较两组手术相关指标、术后康复指标以及术后并发症情况.结果:研究组的切口长度、手术时间均明显较对照组短,术中出血量明显较对照组少(P＜0.05).研究组的术后肛门首次排气、首次下床活动以及住院时间均明显短于对照组(P＜0.05).研究组的并发症风险明显低于对照组(P＜0.05).结论:三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术相比于开腹阑尾切除术,可明显缩短急性阑尾炎患者的手术时间,减少手术创伤,有利于术后康复,且患者术后并发症较少.     

急性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除100例分析

介绍采用电视腹腔镜切除急性阑尾炎100例,采用改良残端处理方法,保证了残端愈合,降低了费用。100例手术中中转剖腹阑尾切除8例,术后无并发症。病人平均住院时间为3.8天,电视腹腔镜阑尾切除术〔LA〕与传统术式比较,具有出血少,疼痛轻,恢复快,出院快等优点,优于传统手术,值得推广应用。     

腹腔镜拖出式阑尾切除术的初步经验

目的总结两孔法腹腔镜拖出式阑尾切除术的初步经验。方法 29例急性阑尾炎或慢性阑尾炎急性发作患者行腹腔镜拖出式阑尾切除术,并与腹腔镜阑尾切除术、传统开腹阑尾切除术进行比对。结果 29例均成功完成腹腔镜拖出式阑尾切除术,无中转开腹。手术时间10～20 min,平均12 min,术后恢复顺利,平均住院日4 d,术后随防3个月,无并发症发生,切口美容效果满意。结论腹腔镜拖出式阑尾切除术安全可行,操作简单易学,对腹腔的探查更具优势,美容美观效果好,设备要求不高,便于在基层医院推广。     

开腹手术和腹腔镜手术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的 对比性研究

目的 比较开腹手术和腹腔镜手术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的临床疗效。方法 选取2015年9月~2017年2月到我院就诊的急性胆源性胰腺炎患者130例,随机分为对照组和观察组,各65例。对照组患者采用开腹手术治疗,观察组患者采用腹腔镜手术进行治疗。比较两组患者出血量、止痛时间、住院时间及术后总恢复率。结果 观察组患者出血量为（84.81±0.27）ml、止痛时间（2.3±1.21）d、住院时间（14.21±3.27）d,低于对照组患者的出血量（145.42±0.16）ml、止痛时间（8.1±2.12）d以及住院时间（22.1±2.06）d,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）;观察组患者术后总恢复率（86.15%）高于对照组的总恢复率（76.92%）,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05)。结论 采用腹腔镜手术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎,可以降低手术出血量,止痛时间,也可以缩短患者的住院时间,创伤小,恢复率高。     

腹腔镜手术治疗急性腹膜炎的临床效果分析

目的分析腹腔镜手术应用于急性腹膜炎的效果遥方法选择我院在2014 年2 月耀2016 年1 月收治的100 例急性腹膜 炎患者为研究对象,按照数字随机原则分为对照组和观察组各50 例,对照组采用传统开腹手术治疗,观察组采用腹腔镜手术治 疗,观察两组患者的手术情况和并发症发生情况遥结果观察组患者手术时间尧下床时间尧排气时间尧拔管时间等各项手术指标 均显著优于对照组患者,差异有统计学意义（约0.05）曰对照组（8.00%）术后并发症发生率高于观察组（4.00%）,差异无统计学意 义（跃0.05）遥结论与传统开腹手术相比,腹腔镜手术治疗急性腹膜炎的效果更加理想,且安全性较高遥     

Feasibility of a Laparoscopic Approach for Generalized Peritonitis from Perforated Appendicitis in Children

Purpose

This study evaluated the feasibility of a laparoscopic approach in children with generalized peritonitis secondary to perforated appendicitis.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy with drainage for generalized peritonitis secondary to perforated appendicitis at our hospital between September 2001 and April 2012. Laparoscopic outcomes were compared with outcomes of an open method for perforated appendicitis.

Results

Ninety-nine patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for generalized peritonitis from perforated appendicitis, and 87 patients underwent open appendectomy (OA) for perforated appendicitis. Wound infection was more common in the OA group (12.6%) than in the LA group (4.0%; p=0.032). The incidence of intestinal obstruction during long-term follow-up was significantly higher in the OA group (4.6% vs. 0.0% in the LA group; p=0.046). LA was possible in most patients for whom LA was attempted, with a conversion rate of 10.8%. Conversion to OA was affected by the preoperative duration of symptoms and the occurrence of intraoperative complications.

Conclusion

LA is feasible for use in children with generalized peritonitis from perforated appendicitis, with reasonable open conversion and perioperative complication rates comparable to those of the OA group.     

腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗小儿复杂性阑尾炎的对比研究

目的 对比腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎的疗效。方法 总结2016年8月~2017年8月在新乡医学院第一附属医院行手术治疗的91例复杂性阑尾炎患儿资料,根据入院顺序随机将患儿分成观察组与对照组。观察组42例行腹腔镜阑尾切除术,对照组49例行开腹阑尾切除术,统计分析两组的手术时间、术中出血量、疼痛程度、术后恢复情况、并发症发生率、住院时间及总费用等指标,比较有无组间差异。结果 LA组在术后疼痛评分、下床活动时间、肠道功能恢复时间、总并发症、切口感染、术后肠梗阻、住院时间、总费用方面优于OA组,差异有统计学意义。OA组在手术时间上优于LA组,差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。两组在术中出血量、腹腔残余感染方面,虽然LA组低于OA组,差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。 结论 LA治疗小儿复杂性阑尾炎安全有效,与OA相比具有手术创伤小、术后恢复快、术后并发症少,住院时间短,住院总费用低等优势。     

急性阑尾炎合并艾滋病患者临床病理特点及其对手术方式的影响

目的 探讨艾滋病患者阑尾炎病理分型特点及与临床手术方式选择的关系。方法 将2013年3月~2018年3月在广州市第八人民医院外科住院治疗的37例急性阑尾炎合并艾滋病患者设为实验组,选取同期同科室治疗的非HIV感染阑尾炎患者50例设为对照组,比较两组病理类型、临床表现和手术方式等方面特点。结果 与非HIV感染患者相比较,艾滋病患者急性阑尾炎病理类型包括急性化脓性阑尾炎、急性坏疽性阑尾炎、结核,马尔尼菲蓝状菌病,巨细胞性病毒性肠炎;其中结核,马尔尼菲蓝状菌病,巨细胞病毒性肠炎发病率高于非HIV患者,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）,在艾滋病患者中,导致患者腹腔镜手术中转开腹的主要病理类型包括结核、马尔尼菲蓝状菌病和急性坏疽性阑尾炎。结论 艾滋病患者急性阑尾炎病理类型包括急性化脓性阑尾炎、急性坏疽性阑尾炎、结核、马尔尼菲蓝状菌病、巨细胞病毒性肠炎;其中结核、马尔尼菲蓝状菌病和急性坏疽性阑尾炎等是艾滋病患者LA中转开腹的主要病理类型;术前建立合理的评判标准有助于减少中转开腹可能。     

Is laparoscopic appendectomy useful for the treatment of acute appendicitis in Korea? A meta-analysis

We performed a meta-analysis using results in the Korean literatures to determine whether laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) or open appendectomy (OA) provide the better outcome in possible acute appendicitis patients. To perform the meta-analysis, an extensive literature search was conducted, giving priority to the Journal of the Korean Surgical Society, and domestic literature in its search database, published since January 1993, to ascertain the usefulness of LA in the treatment of acute appendicitis. The criteria used for the quality evaluation were as follows: 1) study subjects must have been evaluated clinically for suspected acute appendicitis, and 2) articles were included only if sufficient data (e.g. patient number, mean and standard deviation of patient outcome variables) were available regarding patient outcomes for LA or OA treated appendicitis. Of the 136 articles retrieved, 8 studies (1,258 patients) were selected for quantitative meta-analysis. Because insufficient data was available in some studies, operating time and hospitalization days were assessed for all 8 studies, but the time required to return to full functioning was assessed for only 3 studies. Overall effect size estimates were calculated using a random effect model for four patient outcomes (operating time, Q=38.6699, p < 0.001; length of stay, Q=19.3876, p < 0.001; postoperative hospital stay, Q=20.9164, p < 0.001; and return time to full functioning, Q=41.5061, p < 0.001). Because the overall effect size for operating time was -0.3218 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.6108 to -0.0328), LA operating time was significantly greater than that of OA. In addition, a significant difference was found between the two modalities in terms of the length of hospital stay. Overall effect size in terms of the time required to return to full functioning was 1.9757 (95% CI 1.0066 to 2.9448), and LA reduced the time required by about 2 days versus OA. Considering the overall odds ratio (0.33) and 95% CI (0.20 to 0.55) the incidence of wound infection was significantly lower in LA than in OA. This review of the published evidence suggests that LA is more useful for treating acute appendicitis, especially when perforated appendicitis is suspected.     

Feasibility of the Short Hospital Stays after Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Uncomplicated Appendicitis

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of short hospital stays after laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis.

Materials and Methods

The records of 142 patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis from January 2010 to December 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were allocated to an early (<48 hours) or a late (>48 hours) group by postoperative hospital stay. Postoperative complications and readmission rates in the two groups were evaluated and compared.

Results

Overall mean patient age was 50.1 (±16.0) years, and mean hospital stay was 3.8 (±2.8) days. Fifty-four patients (group E, 38.0%) were discharged within 48 hours of surgery, and 88 patients (group L, 62.0%) stayed more than 48 hours. Overall complication rates were similar in the two groups (14.8% vs. 21.6%, p=0.318), and wound complications (13.0% vs. 12.5%), postoperative bowel obstruction (1.9% vs. 2.3%), and abdominal pain (1.9% vs. 3.4%) were not significantly different.

Conclusion

Patients that undergo laparoscopic appendectomy due to uncomplicated appendicitis may be safely discharged within 48 hours. Further study should be conducted to determine the optimal length of hospital stay after laparoscopic appendectomy to reduce hospital costs.     

电视腹腔镜复合性手术的临床研究

目的拓宽电视腹腔镜手术在腹部外科及相邻学科的应用范围,便于多病联治并节约医疗费用.方法对我科在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中同时施行阑尾切除术19例,附件切除术5例,肝囊肿开窗引流术4例,肠粘连松解术3例,阑尾切除加疝修补术2例,共计施行复合性腹腔镜手术33例的临床资料进行分析,就其手术指征及操作程序进行探讨.结果32例完全在腹腔镜下完成,仅1例开腹手术协同.结论只要严格掌握复合性手术的指征,该术式能够安全有效处理两种以上的腹部病变,不增加术后疼痛,不延长住院期及康复时间.     

复杂性阑尾炎腔镜术后预防性置管引流的可行性研究

目的探讨复杂性阑尾炎腔镜切除术后预防性置管引流的可行性。方法回顾性分析196例行腔镜切除复杂性阑尾炎患者的临床资料,其中预防性置管引流96例,未预防性置管引流100例,比较两组术后并发症的发生率及住院天数。结果术后总体并发症发生率及腹壁感染率置管组较未置管组高,且差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。腹腔脓肿等并发症发生率两组之间无统计学差异（P〉0.05）。置管组住院天数明显延长。结论复杂性阑尾炎行腹腔镜阑尾切除术后常规放置腹腔引流没有必要,反而增加术后并发症的发生率。