Helicobacter pylori eradication with proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies and re-treatment with ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple therapy

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that short-term triple therapy comprising a proton pump inhibitor, plus clarithromycin and amoxycillin be used as first choice in treating H. pylori infection, while eradication failure patients should be further treated with a quadruple therapy. Nevertheless, conflicting results have been reported using these treatment regimens in different countries. METHODS: A total of 278 patients with H. pylori infection were randomised to receive one-week triple therapy, comprising clarithromycin 500 mg b.d., amoxycillin 1 g b.d., and either omeprazole 20 mg b.d. (OAC; 90 patients), or pantoprazole 40 mg b.d. (PAC; 95 patients), or lansoprazole 30 mg b.d. (LAC; 93 patients). H. pylori infection at entry, and eradication 4-6 weeks after therapy had ended, were assessed by rapid urease test and histology on biopsies from the antrum and the corpus. When eradication did not occur, patients were given a 2-week treatment comprising ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d., tetracycline 500 mg t.d.s. and tinidazole 500 mg b.d. (RBTT). Eradication in these patients was assessed 4-6 weeks after conclusion of treatment by a further endoscopy. RESULTS: Six patients were lost to the follow-up. At the end of the first course of treatment, the overall H. pylori eradication rate was 78% (95% CI: 73-83) and 79% (95% CI: 75-84) at 'intention-to-treat' (ITT) and 'per protocol' (PP) analysis, respectively, without any statistically significant difference between treatment regimens, although a trend for better results with the omeprazole combination was observed. Moreover, H. pylori eradication was achieved in 82% (95% CI: 75-97) (ITT) and 86% (95% CI: 69-94) (PP) of 38 patients re-treated with RBTT regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Our data found that this short-term triple therapy is not a satisfactory treatment (< 80% eradication rate) for H. pylori infection. The 2-week triple therapy used as re-treatment in eradication failure patients yielded more promising results.     

Treatment options for Helicobacter pylori infection when proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy fails in clinical practice

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens has not been extensively investigated in the clinical practice setting. The optimal treatment choice after an initial failed eradication attempt has not been determined. AIMS: To evaluate proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies as first-line eradication regimens in clinical practice, and to establish the efficacy of second-line regimens in the context of an initial failed eradication attempt. METHODS: Three hundred and eight patients with dyspepsia and evidence of H. pylori at endoscopy were recruited. As first-line therapy, 116 patients received omeprazole 20 mg b.d. in combination with amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. (OAC) while 192 patients received omeprazole 20 mg b.d. in combination with metronidazole 400 mg b.d. and clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. (OMC). H. pylori status was reassessed at least 4 weeks after therapy (25 patients failed to attend for further testing). Of 52 patients with an initial failed eradication attempt, 20 patients received a 1 week quadruple therapy regimen incorporating omeprazole 20 mg b.d., tripotassium dicitrato bismuthate 120 mg q.d.s., tetracycline 500 mg q.d.s. and metronidazole 400 mg t.d.s., 20 patients received a 2-week proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy regimen as described, and 12 patients received a further 1-week proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy regimen. RESULTS: Including 308 patients, the intention-to-treat (ITT) eradication rates for OAC and OMC as first-line regimens were 72% (95% CI: 63-80%) and 73% (95% CI: 67-79%) respectively. A per protocol (PP) analysis on the 283 patients who completed follow-up gives an initial eradication rate of 78% (95% CI: 69-86%) for OAC and 79% (95% CI: 73-85%) for OMC. There were 60 patients (21%; 95% CI: 17-26%) in whom the initial eradication attempt was unsuccessful. With second-line therapy, H. pylori was successfully eradicated in a further 35/52 (67%; 95% CI: 58-73%) patients. The eradication rates with the quadruple regimen and 2-week triple therapy regimens were 75% (95% CI: 56-94%) and 80% (95% CI: 63-98%) respectively (P = 0. 71). The eradication rate with a repeat 1-week regimen was 33% (95% CI: 7-60%). CONCLUSIONS: The eradication rates achieved in this 'in practice' study with recommended first-line 1-week proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy regimens were lower than the rates achieved with similar regimens in the clinical trial setting. A repeat 1-week proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy regimen was not successful as a salvage therapy. Both the 2-week proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy regimen and the 1-week quadruple therapy regimen were successful second-line treatments in >/=75% of patients.     

High-dose proton pump inhibitor plus amoxycillin for the treatment or retreatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

Background : The combination of 120 mg of omeprazole (40 mg t.d.s.) and amoxycillin has been reported to be effective for treating H. pylori infections.
Methods : Normal volunteers with H. pylori infection received high-dose omeprazole (40 mg t.d.s.) or lansoprazole (60 mg t.d.s.) plus amoxycillin 750 mg t.d.s. for 14 days. The studies were open label and not randomized as those receiving omeprazole plus amoxycillin had previously failed lower dose omeprazole (20 mg b.d.) plus amoxycillin therapy more than 6 months previously. Those receiving lansoprazole plus amoxycillin had not been previously treated. Four to 6 weeks after ending antimicrobial therapy, H. pylori status was determined by Genta stain of gastric mucosal biopsies.
Results : Forty-three volunteers entered the study and 41 completed it. The overall success with high-dose proton pump inhibitor plus amoxycillin was 34.9%. For the individual regimens the per-protocol results were 48% (95% CI=28–69%) with lansoprazole and 12.5% (95% CI=2–38%) with omeprazole. Compliance was >95% for both regimens. Side-effects were experienced by four lansoprazole and three omeprazole subjects, and caused two omeprazole subjects to withdraw. Cure rates were similar among different races and ethnic groups, between men and women, and between smokers and non-smokers. The level of the pre-treatment urea breath test also did not predict outcome.
Conclusion : High-dose proton pump inhibitor plus amoxycillin combinations for treatment of H. pylori infection yielded unacceptable results, as the 95% confidence intervals did not include an 80% cure rate. These combinations do not yield consistent results worldwide and cannot be recommended as primary therapy.     

Systematic review: Rabeprazole-based therapies in Helicobacter pylori eradication

AIM: To perform a systematic review of the efficacy of rabeprazole-based therapies in Helicobacter pylori eradication, and to conduct a meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of rabeprazole and other proton pump inhibitors when co-prescribed with antibiotics. METHODS: Studies evaluating rabeprazole plus antibiotics were considered. Only randomized trials comparing rabeprazole and other proton pump inhibitors with antibiotics, and differing only in the proton pump inhibitor, were included in the meta-analysis. Electronic and manual bibliographic searches were conducted. The percentage (weighted mean) of successful eradication was calculated. Meta-analysis was performed by combining the odds ratios (OR) of the individual studies. RESULTS: The eradication rates were as follows: 14-day rabeprazole-amoxicillin, 73%; rabeprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin for 3, 5, 7 and 10 days, 44%, 72%, 78% and 75%, respectively; low-dose rabeprazole (20 mg/day), amoxicillin and clarithromycin for 7 days, 81%; high-dose rabeprazole (40 mg/day), amoxicillin and clarithromycin for 7 days, 75%; 7-day rabeprazole-clarithromycin-nitroimidazole, 85%. Twelve comparative studies were included in the meta-analysis. The eradication rate with rabeprazole plus antibiotics was 79%; it was 77% with other proton pump inhibitors (OR = 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.42). Sub-analysis comparing rabeprazole at low doses (10 mg b.d.) with other proton pump inhibitors at standard doses (omeprazole 20 mg b.d. or lansoprazole 30 mg b.d.) showed no differences. CONCLUSIONS: Rabeprazole achieves similar H. pylori eradication rates to omeprazole and lansoprazole when co-prescribed with antibiotics. Low doses of rabeprazole (10 mg b.d.), when administered with two antibiotics, may be sufficient to eradicate H. pylori infection.     

One-week triple therapy with esomeprazole provides effective eradication of Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer disease

BACKGROUND: Esomeprazole is the first proton pump inhibitor to be developed as an optical isomer for the treatment of acid-related diseases. METHODS: Four hundred and forty eight duodenal ulcer patients with Helicobacter pylori infection, confirmed by 13C-urea breath test (UBT), and no current ulcer, were randomised to double-blind treatment with esomeprazole 20 mg twice daily (b.d.) (n=224) or omeprazole 20 mg b.d. (n=224), in combination with amoxicillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. for 1 week (EAC and OAC, respectively). A negative UBT at both 4 and 8 weeks after completing therapy indicated successful H. pylori eradication. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis comprised 400 patients (EAC, n=204; OAC, n=196) and per protocol (PP) analysis 377 patients (EAC, n=192; OAC, n=185). Eradication rates (95% confidence intervals) for ITT and PP populations were: EAC, 90% (85-94%) and 91% (86-94%); OAC, 88% (82-92%) and 91% (86-95%). Between-group differences in eradication rates were not statistically significant. Both regimens were well tolerated, with an adverse event profile and frequency typical of proton pump inhibitor plus antibiotic combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Esomeprazole-based triple therapy for 1 week is highly effective in eradicating H. pylori infection in duodenal ulcer disease, offers comparable efficacy to omeprazole-based therapy, and is well tolerated.     

Single vs. double dose of a proton pump inhibitor in triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Triple therapies combining a double dose of proton pump inhibitor plus two antibiotics are the standard treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection. Some reports suggest that the use of half the dose of proton pump inhibitor is equally effective. AIM: To compare the efficacy of a single vs. double dose of proton pump inhibitor in triple therapy. METHODS: We conducted a MEDLINE search. The search strategy included the words (pylori) AND (triple, PPI, proton pump, omeprazole, rabeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole, clarithromycin, amoxicillin, amoxycillin or metronidazole). Abstracts of the articles obtained and papers presented at the European Helicobacter pylori Study Group and American Gastroenterological Association congresses from 1996 to 2001 were examined. Inclusion criteria were: (i) randomized studies with at least two branches of triple therapy including a proton pump inhibitor and two standard antibiotics; (ii) branches could differ only in terms of proton pump inhibitor dosage. A meta-analysis was conducted using conventional shareware (Review Manager 4.1). RESULTS: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 2391 patients. Cure rates with double doses of proton pump inhibitor were higher in both the intention-to-treat analysis (83.9% vs. 77.7%; Peto odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-1.85; P < 0.01) and per protocol analysis (89% vs. 81%; Peto odds ratio, 1.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.55-2.47; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Triple therapies containing a single dose of proton pump inhibitor are less effective than those containing a standard double dose of proton pump inhibitor.     

CYP2C19 Genotype and Pharmacokinetics of Three Proton Pump Inhibitors in Healthy Subjects

PURPOSE: To predict the CYP2C19 genotype-dependence in anti-Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) therapy when lansoprazole or rabeprazole was used instead of omeprazole as a proton pump inhibitor (PPI). METHODS: A comparative pharmacokinetic study with each PPI was designed as an open, randomized, and crossover study of 18 Japanese healthy volunteers who were classified into the homozygous, heterozygous extensive metabolizer and the poor metabolizer based on the CYP2C19 genotype determined by PCR-RFLP method. Each subject received a single oral dose of 20 mg omeprazole, 30 mg lansoprazole, or 20 mg sodium rabeprazole, with at least 1 week washout period between treatments. Plasma concentrations of PPIs and their metabolites were monitored until 12 h after medication. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic profiles of omeprazole and lansoprazole were well correlated with the CYP2C19 genotype. The heterozygous extensive metabolizer was slightly different from the homozygote, but there was no statistically significant difference. The CYP2C19 genotype dependence found for lansoprazole was not obvious compared with omeprazole. As for rabeprazole, the pharmacokinetic profile was independent of the CYP2C19 genotype. CONCLUSIONS: CYP2C19 genotype dependence will be found in the anti-H. pylori therapy even when lansoprazole is used as the PPI.     

Systematic review of proton pump inhibitors for the acute treatment of reflux oesophagitis

BACKGROUND: Esomeprazole is a new proton pump inhibitor, which has been compared to omeprazole for the treatment of reflux oesophagitis in clinical trials. AIM: To compare the effectiveness of esomeprazole with the recommended dose of proton pump inhibitors in the healing of reflux oesophagitis, using omeprazole as a common comparator. METHODS: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Extraction and re-analysis of data to provide 'intention-to-treat' results. Meta-analysis using a Fixed Effects model. RESULTS: A meta-analysis of healing rates of esomeprazole 40 mg compared to omeprazole 20 mg gave the following results: at 4 weeks (relative risk 1.14; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.18) and 8 weeks (RR 1.08; 95%CI: 1.05, 1.10). Other proton pump inhibitors compared to omeprazole 20 mg are as follows: lansoprazole 30 mg at 4 weeks (RR 1.02; 95%CI: 0.97, 1.08) and 8 weeks (RR 1.01; 95%CI: 0.97, 1.06); pantoprazole 40 mg at 4 weeks (RR 0.99; 95%CI: 0.91, 1.07) and 8 weeks (RR 0.98; 95%CI: 0.93, 1.04); rabeprazole 20 mg at 4 weeks (RR 1.00; 95%CI: 0.87, 1.14) and 8 weeks (RR 0.98; 95%CI: 0.91, 1.05). CONCLUSIONS: Esomeprazole has demonstrated higher healing rates than omeprazole at 4 and 8 weeks. Other proton pump inhibitors (lansoprazole, pantoprazole and rabeprazole) have not shown higher healing rates when compared with omeprazole.     

Helicobacter pylori-positive duodenal ulcer: three-day antibiotic eradication regimen

BACKGROUND: The most widely used treatments for ulcer healing and Helicobacter pylori eradication consist of a 1-2 week regimen of a proton pump inhibitor plus two or three antimicrobials. AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, cost, and tolerance of a three-day regimen with three antibiotics vs. a 10-day treatment with a proton pump inhibitor or vs. a ranitidine bismuth citrate triple therapy. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-one patients with endoscopically-proven H. pylori-positive duodenal ulcers were recruited to the study. Recruited patients were assigned to one of the following four regimens: (I) omeprazole 40 mg o.m. plus amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. for 10 days (OAC: 55 patients); (ii) omeprazole 40 mg o.m. on days 1-5, plus amoxycillin 1 g b.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and metronidazole 500 mg b.d. on days 3-5 (OACM: 56 patients); (iii) ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d. plus amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. for 10 days (RAC: 54 patients); (iv) ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d. on days 1-5, plus amoxycillin 1 g b.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and metronidazole 500 mg b.d. on days 3-5 (RACM: 56 patients). Fisher's exact test was used to compare data regarding healing and eradication in the four groups. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat eradication and ulcer healing rates for the RACM regimen were 95% and 98%, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed, relating to the eradication and healing of ulcers, between RACM and either the RAC or OAC regimens. CONCLUSION: The three-day antibiotic therapy with amoxycillin, clarithromycin and metronidazole in addition to ranitidine bismuth citrate is a very effective anti-H. pylori regimen.     

Dual therapy with high doses of rabeprazole and amoxicillin versus triple therapy with rabeprazole,amoxicillin, and metronidazole as a rescue regimen for <Emphasis Type="Italic">Helicobacter pylori</Emphasis> infection after the standard triple therapy

Backgrounds and Aims Development of safe and effective rescue regimens for eradication failure of Helicobacter pylori infection by standard regimens is an urgent task. We designed the prospective study to compare the efficacy of two rescue regimens after eradication failure by the standard triple therapy. Methods One hundred and thirty-two patients in whom eradication of H. pylori infection failed initial triple therapy with lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d, amoxicillin 750 mg b.i.d. and clarithromycin 400 mg b.i.d. for 1 week were randomized to either the 1–week triple therapy with rabeprazole 10 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin 750 mg b.i.d., and metronidazole 250 mg b.i.d. (RAM) or the 2–week dual therapy with rabeprazole 10 mg q.i.d. and amoxicillin 500 mg q.i.d. (RA). Eradication of H. pylori was judged by ¹³C-urea breath test 1 month later. Results The intention-to-treat and per-protocol-based eradication rates were 92.4% (95% CI: 83.2–97.5) and 95.3% (95% CI: 86.9–99.0) for the RAM therapy and 90.9% (95% CI: 81.2–96.6) and 93.8% (95% CI: 84.8–98.3), respectively, for the RA therapy (P > 0.2 for both). No clinically recognizable adverse events were observed with either regimen. Conclusion RA as well as RAM therapy are safe and effective rescue regimens for H. pylori infection after eradication failure by the standard triple therapy.     

One-week triple therapy with omeprazole, amoxycillin and either clarithromycin or metronidazole for cure of Helicobacter pylori infection

Aim: The present study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of 1-week triple therapy regimens for Helicobacter pylori .
Methods: In two consecutive series, 120 patients with proven H. pylori infection and peptic ulcer disease or functional dyspepsia were treated with either omeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. (OAC; n=60) or with omeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and metronidazole 400 mg b.d. over 1 week (OAM; n=60). H. pylori infection was assessed by rapid urease test, culture and histology before and 4 weeks after cessation of the eradication therapy.
Results: H. pylori eradication succeeded in 53 out of 60 patients by omeprazole–amoxycillin–clarithromycin (OAC) (88%; 95% CI 77–95%) and in 47 out of 60 patients by omeprazole–amoxycillin–metronidazole (OAM) (78%; 95% CI 66–88%) (P=0.22). Nine patients of each group available for follow-up reported adverse events (15.0 and 15.5%, respectively) without necessity of discontinuation of the study medications. Serious adverse events were not observed.
Conclusions: Simple and convenient 1-week triple therapies consisting of omeprazole, amoxycillin and either clarithromycin or metronidazole are sufficiently effective in eradicating H. pylori infection.     

4种质子泵抑制剂治疗胃食管反流病的临床观察

目的:比较4种质子泵抑制剂埃索美拉唑(esomeprazole)、奥美拉唑(omeprazole)、兰索拉唑(lansoprazole)和雷贝拉唑(rabeprazole)对胃食管反流病(GERD)患者,在胃酸分泌、控制症状、治愈食管炎等方面的影响。方法:将经胃镜诊断明确的124例GERD患者随机分为A,B,C,D 4组,分别给予埃索美拉唑40 mg·d~(-1),奥美拉唑40 mg·d~(-1),兰索拉唑30 mg·d~(-1),雷贝拉唑20 mg·d~(-1),qd,疗程均为4周。结果:4种质子泵抑制剂症状缓解率分别为93.1%,81.6%,85.7%和86.4%,内镜下食管炎治愈率在70%以上(P<0.05)。结论:埃索美拉唑在症状缓解率和内镜下食管炎治愈率明显优于其他3种质子泵抑制剂。     

Meta-analysis: proton pump inhibitor or H2-receptor antagonist for Helicobacter pylori eradication

AIM: To compare H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors as adjuvants to triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. METHODS: H. pylori-infected patients with peptic ulcer were randomized to receive either 300 mg nizatidine or 30 mg lansoprazole plus 1 g amoxicillin and 500 mg clarithromycin taken b.d. for 7 days. H. pylori eradication was assessed 4 weeks after therapy. Using meta-analytical techniques, we combined the results of this study with other randomized controlled comparisons of H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors as adjuvants to triple therapy. RESULTS: One hundred and one patients were randomized. H. pylori eradication was 94% (47/50) [95% confidence interval (CI), 83-99%] (intention-to-treat) in the H2-receptor antagonist group vs. 86% (44/51) (95% CI, 74-94%) in the proton pump inhibitor group (P = 0.3). There has been a total of 12 similar studies (1415 patients). The overall efficacy was similar in intention-to-treat analysis: 78% (549/701) with H2-receptor antagonists vs. 81% (575/714) with proton pump inhibitors (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.66-1.12). A non-significant trend favouring H2-receptor antagonist (79% vs. 69%; odds ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.76-1.71; P = 0.5) was seen in the comparison of clarithromycin-containing regimens. In contrast, in non-clarithromycin-containing trials, there was a slight, but significant, advantage with proton pump inhibitors (85% vs. 78%; odds ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.92; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Overall, proton pump inhibitor and H2-receptor antagonist antisecretory agents appear to be similarly effective as adjuvants for H. pylori triple therapy. It is unlikely that the direct anti-H. pylori effect of proton pump inhibitors is responsible for their ability to enhance anti-H. pylori therapy.     

Safety and efficacy of 7-day rabeprazole- and omeprazole-based triple therapy regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with documented peptic ulcer disease

AIM: A double-blind, randomized study was designed to determine whether rabeprazole- and omeprazole-based triple therapy regimens are therapeutically equivalent in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. METHODS: Three hundred and forty-five patients with current or previously active peptic ulcer and a positive H. pylori urease test were randomly assigned to receive RCA, OCA, RCM or OCM twice daily for 7 days (R, rabeprazole 20 mg; O, omeprazole 20 mg; C, clarithromycin 500 mg; A, amoxicillin 1000 mg; M, metronidazole 400 mg). H. pylori eradication was documented by negative 13C-urea breath tests at 4 and 12 weeks, and was evaluated using a 2 x 2 factorial design with proton pump inhibitor and antibiotic as factors. RESULTS: Overall eradication rates (per protocol/intention-to-treat) were 87%/77% and 85%/75% with rabeprazole and omeprazole, respectively (not significant). However, a statistical interaction between proton pump inhibitor and antibiotic was identified. RCA produced a somewhat higher eradication rate than OCA (94% vs. 84%; difference, 9.8%; 95% confidence interval, - 0.7% to + 20.4%), whereas RCM produced a lower eradication rate than OCM (79% vs. 86%; difference, 8.1%; 95% confidence interval, - 21.4% to + 5.1%). Ulcer healing rates were > 90% with H. pylori eradication. Each regimen was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Rabeprazole- and omeprazole-based triple therapy regimens are therapeutically equivalent in the eradication of H. pylori and well tolerated. The statistical interaction observed between the proton pump inhibitor and supplementary antibiotic may be due to chance.     

Rabeprazole, amoxycillin and low- or high-dose clarithromycin for cure of Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND: Rabeprazole sodium is a proton pump inhibitor. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 1-week triple therapy with rabeprazole, amoxycillin and clarithromycin for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. METHODS: A total of 100 subjects with H. pylori were randomly divided into two groups of 1-week triple therapy with rabeprazole 10 mg b.d., amoxycillin 750 mg b.d. and either clarithromycin 200 mg b.d. (RAC400, n=50) or clarithromycin 400 mg b. d. (RAC800, n=50). Endoscopic examination with four biopsies (two specimens from the antrum and two from the gastric body) was performed. The status of H. pylori infection was determined using culture and histology (Giemsa stain) of the biopsy specimens. Sensitivity to clarithromycin was determined using the E-test: MIC > 8 g/mL was considered to be resistant, whereas MIC < 2 g/mL was considered to be sensitive. Cure was defined as no evidence of H. pylori infection 1 month after completion of treatment. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the clinical characteristics of the two groups. Eradication rates (intention-to-treat and per protocol, respectively) were: RAC400: 86% (95% CI: 76-95%) and 89% (95% CI: 80-97%); RAC800: 94% (95% CI: 87-100%) and 97% (95% CI: 94-100%). There was no significant difference between the eradication rates of either regimen. Three subjects with failed eradication in the RAC400 group were all infected with a clarithromycin-resistant strain before beginning the therapy. Haemorrhagic colitis was the only severe adverse event, which was observed in one patient in the RAC800 group. CONCLUSION: One-week triple therapy with rabeprazole, amoxycillin and low-dose clarithromycin is effective for the eradication of H. pylori infection.     

Decreasing oesophageal acid exposure in patients with GERD: a comparison of rabeprazole and omeprazole

BACKGROUND: Rabeprazole has been shown to be more potent and faster than other proton pump inhibitors in in vitro studies and highly effective in decreasing oesophageal acid exposure in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). AIM: This study was a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group comparison of three active treatment regimens utilizing two different proton pump inhibitors, or placebo, administered over 7 days in patients with GERD. METHODS: Eighty-two patients with symptomatic GERD were given placebo, rabeprazole 10 mg b.d., rabeprazole 20 mg o.m., or omeprazole 20 mg o.m. for 7 days. Twenty-four hour oesophageal pH monitoring was performed at baseline and repeated at the conclusion of the treatment period. RESULTS: At the end of study, the percentage time (mean +/- s.d.) with pH < 4 over a 24-h period was significantly decreased by the three active regimens but without significant difference between them (9.27 +/- 4.77; 2.53 +/- 4.27; 2.02 +/- 1.71 and 2.91 +/- 4.06 for placebo, rabeprazole 10 mg b.d., rabeprazole 20 mg o.m. and omeprazole 20 mg o.m., respectively). Acid exposure was normalized in 90% of patients treated with rabeprazole 10 mg b.d., 95% treated with rabeprazole 20 mg o.m., 78% treated with omeprazole 20 mg o.m., and only 9.5% of patients treated with placebo. Both rabeprazole and omeprazole were well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Although rabeprazole 20 mg o.m. showed greater activity numerically, this study demonstrates that rabeprazole 10 mg b.d. and 20 mg o.m. are equivalent to omeprazole 20 mg o.m. in decreasing oesophageal acid exposure.     

Meta-analysis: comparative efficacy of different proton-pump inhibitors in triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND: It is not known whether certain proton-pump inhibitors are more efficacious than others when used in triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. AIM: To compare the efficacy of different proton-pump inhibitors in triple therapy by performing a meta-analysis. METHODS: A MEDLINE search was performed. Abstracts of the European Helicobacter pylori Study Group and the American Gastroenterological Association congresses from 1996 to 2002 were also examined. Randomized studies with at least two branches of triple therapy that differed only in terms of type of proton-pump inhibitor were included in a meta-analysis using Review Manager 4.1. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included. Intention-to-treat cure rates were similar for omeprazole and lansoprazole: 74.7% vs. 76%, odds ratio (OR) 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-1.21] in a total of 1085 patients; for omeprazole and rabeprazole: 77.9% vs. 81.2%, OR 0.81 (95% CI 0.58-1.15) in a total of 825 patients; for omeprazole and esomeprazole: 87.7% vs. 89%, OR 0.89 (95% CI 0.58-1.35) in 833 patients; and for lansoprazole and rabeprazole: 81% vs. 85.7%, OR 0.77 (95% CI 0.48-1.22) in 550 patients. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of various proton-pump inhibitors seems to be similar when used for H. pylori eradication in standard triple therapy.     

Is antimicrobial susceptibility testing necessary before second‐line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection?

BACKGROUND: An antimicrobial susceptibility test for Helicobacter pylori before second-line treatment is often performed, although whether the test is truly necessary remains unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-two patients with H. pylori infection for whom first-line treatment with a 1-week proton pump inhibitor/amoxicillin-clarithromycin (AC) regimen had failed were randomly assigned to two groups: those having or not having the susceptibility test before re-treatment. The cure rates for these two groups were compared. RESULTS: Five of the 82 patients were excluded from the analysis. For 38 patients in the susceptibility-test group, we used what we considered the best regimen based on susceptibility testing: 10 patients [no resistance to clarithromycin (CAM)] received the lansoprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin regimen, 22 patients [19 CAM resistant, metronidazole (MNZ) susceptible; three failure of culture] were given the lansoprazole-amoxicillin-metronidazole (LAM) regimen, and six patients (both MNZ and CAM resistant) received dual therapy with omeprazole (OPZ) and amoxicillin (AMOX) in which the OPZ dose was determined by the CYP2C19 gene polymorphism. For 39 patients in the group with no susceptibility testing, LAM regimens were prescribed. The intention-to-treat (ITT)-based cure rates in the groups with and without susceptibility testing were 81.6% (95% confidence interval; 66-92%) and 92.4% (79-98%), respectively, and there was no significant difference between these two groups. CONCLUSION: Susceptibility testing is not necessarily required before second-line therapy if the first-line treatment has been performed using proton pump inhibitor/AC regimens.     

Effects of rabeprazole,lansoprazole and omeprazole on intragastric pH in CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers

AIM: To investigate the inhibitory effects on gastric acid secretion of three proton pump inhibitors, omeprazole, lansoprazole and rabeprazole, using a three-way crossover design in healthy Helicobacter pylori-negative,S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylase (CYP2C19) homo- and hetero-extensive metabolizers. METHODS: Eight healthy Japanese male volunteers were enrolled. After the administration of rabeprazole (10 mg/day), lansoprazole (30 mg/day) or omeprazole (20 mg/day), intragastric pH monitoring was commenced from 24 h before the first proton pump inhibitor dose, and continued for days 1-3 after proton pump inhibitor administration. The pH electrode was used for 48 h and changed just before pH monitoring on day 2. RESULTS: For the administration of 10 mg/day rabeprazole, the mean ratios of the 24-h pH > or = 3 holding time were 5.7 +/- 1.1%,13.6 +/- 2.2%, 35.3 +/- 2.7% and 62.8 +/- 3.1% for the pre-treatment day and days 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The same ratios for lansoprazole (30 mg/day) were 5.7 +/- 0.7%, 7.4 +/- 1.5%, 13.6 +/- 3.4% and 26.6 +/- 4.9%; the same ratios for 20 mg/day omeprazole were 5.9 +/- 0.9%, 6.1 +/- 1.2%, 11.4 +/- 2.8% and 16.4 +/- 4.6%. The mean ratio of the 24-h pH > or = 3 holding time of days 1-3 increased significantly compared to the pre-treatment day (P < 0.01) with the administration of rabeprazole and lansoprazole. The magnitude of inhibition of gastric acid secretion after rabeprazole administration was stronger than that after lansoprazole. A significant elevation of the mean ratio of the 24-h pH > or = 3 holding time was demonstrated on days 2 and 3 with omeprazole (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In H. pylori-negative CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers, rabeprazole (10 mg/day) shows a faster onset of rising intragastric pH and a stronger inhibition of gastric acid secretion than do lansoprazole (30 mg/day) or omeprazole (20 mg/day).     

Triple therapy in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer disease: results of a multicentre study in South-East Asia. South-East Asia Multicenter Study Group

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of proton pump inhibitor based triple therapy in patients from South-East Asia, where metronidazole resistance is reportedly high, has not been formally assessed in randomized, multicentre trials. AIM: To compare the eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori, ulcer healing rates and side-effects of three regimens of omeprazole triple therapy in patients with duodenal ulcer from South-East Asia and to study the impact of metronidazole resistance. METHODS: A single blind, randomized parallel group, comparative multicentre study. A total of 246 patients from 15 centres in four South-East Asian countries were randomized to receive OAC (omeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxycillin 1 g b. d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d.), OAM (omeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxycillin 1 g b.d., metronidazole 400 mg b.d.) or OMC (omeprazole 20 mg b.d., metronidazole 400 mg b.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d.) for 7 days. After triple therapy, the patients were further randomized to receive either omeprazole or placebo for 7 days. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed before treatment and 4 weeks after treatment. Biopsies for culture and for histopathological examination for H. pylori were taken from corpus and antrum before treatment and 4 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: The eradication rates were intention-to-treat/per protocol (95% CI): OAC 87% (79-94%)/94% (89-100%); OAM 80% (70-89%)/91% (83-98%); OMC 85% (77-93%)/94% (88-100%). The difference in eradication rates between the three groups was not statistically significant (P=0.419). Pre-treatment metronidazole resistance, was found in 34% of isolates and was a significant prognostic factor in patients receiving OAM (odds ratio 5.26) but not in patients receiving OAC or OMC. CONCLUSIONS: All three treatment regimens were safe, well tolerated and highly effective for eradication of H. pylori and ulcer healing. Pre-treatment metronidazole resistance reduced the efficacy of OAM but did not affect the efficacy of OMC.