Clinical utility of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy of the prostate after negative magnetic resonance imaging−guided transrectal biopsy

PurposeWe evaluated the prostate cancer detection with transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen and negative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)−guided biopsy.Materials and methodsTotally 75 patients underwent transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy for prior negative MRI−guided (cognitive registration) biopsy during April 2013 to August 2014. Primary objective was to report clinically significant cancer detection in this cohort of patients. Significant cancer was defined using varying thresholds of MCL or Gleason grade 3+4 or greater or both. Cancers with more than 80% of positive core length anterior to the level of urethra were termed anterior zone cancer. Secondary objective was to evaluate the potential clinical and radiological predictors for significant cancer detection.ResultsThe mean age was 61.6±6.5 years and median prostate-specific antigen was 10.4 ng/dl (7.9−18) with a mean MRI target size of 7.2 mm (4−11). Transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy identified cancer in 36% (27/75) patients and 66.6% (18/27) of them were anterior zone cancers. The rates of detection of clinically significant and insignificant cancer according to the several definitions used range from 22.7% to 30.7% and 5.3% to 13.3%, respectively. Multivariate analysis did not identify any predictors for finding clinically significant and anterior cancers in this group of patients.ConclusionTransperineal template-guided mapping biopsy appears to be an excellent biopsy protocol for downstream management following negative MRI−guided biopsy. Most of the cancers detected were predominantly anterior tumors.     

Targeted prostate biopsy： value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in detection of localized cancer

Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men, with 1.1 million new cases worldwide reported by the World Health Organization in one recent year. Transrectal ultrasound （TRUS）-guided biopsy has been used for the diagnosis of prostate cancer for over 2 decades, but the technique is usually blind to cancer location. Moreover, the false negative rate of TRUS biopsy has been reported to be as high as 47%. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging （mp-MRI） includes T1- and T2-weighted imaging as well as dynamic contrast-enhanced （DCE） and diffusion-weighted imaging （DWI）. mp-MRI is a major advance in the imaging of prostate cancer, enabling targeted biopsy of suspicious lesions. Evolving targeted biopsy techniquesmincluding direct in-bore biopsy, cognitive fusion and software-based MRI-ultrasound （MRI-US） fusion--have led to a several-fold improvement in cancer detection compared to the earlier method. Importantly, the detection of clinically significant cancers has been greatly facilitated by targeting, compared to systematic biopsy alone. Targeted biopsy via MRI-US fusion may dramatically alter the way prostate cancer is diagnosed and managed.     

A systematic review and meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound guided fusion biopsy of prostate for cancer detection—Comparing transrectal with transperineal approaches

Targeted biopsy using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging increases the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csCaP). In this meta-analysis, we compare the diagnostic accuracy of transrectal (TR) vs transperineal (TP) approaches for MRI-guided software fusion biopsy (FB) in the detection of csCaP. A literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane and Embase electronic databases up until July 2019 following the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis system. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of either approach was evaluated using radical prostatectomy or systematic biopsies with ≥24 biopsy cores to be the reference standard. Fourteen papers with a total of 2002 patients were selected. Seven hundred and sixty-five patients underwent TR FB, while 1,387 underwent TP FB. One hundred and fifty of the patients underwent both TR and TP approaches. Both approaches were similar in terms of sensitivity (TR vs. TP: 0.81 vs 0.80) and specificity (TR vs. TP: 0.99 vs 0.95). In terms of likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratio, TR performed better than TP approach. The area under the receiving operator curve for both approaches was similar (0.91 vs 0.88 respectively). However, there was substantial heterogeneity across the studies for both approaches. TP and TR approaches to software-based FB yield similar diagnostic performance for the detection of csCaP. When deciding on the approach, physicians should consider other inherent features of either technique that suit their practice.     

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging–targeted biopsy for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with prior negative biopsy results

PurposeWe aimed to determine the performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in patients with prior negative transrectal ultrasound–guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-B) results.Materials and methodsBetween 2010 and 2013, 2,416 men underwent TRUS-B or an mpMRI or both at Vancouver General Hospital. Among these, 283 men had persistent suspicion of PCa despite prior negative TRUS-B finding. An MRI was obtained in 112, and a lesion (prostate imaging reporting and data system score ≥3) was identified in 88 cases (78%). A subsequent combined MRI-targeted and standard template biopsy was performed in 86 cases. A matching cohort of 86 patients was selected using a one-nearest neighbor method without replacement. The end points were the rate of diagnosis of PCa and significant PCa (sPCa) (Gleason>6, or>2 cores, or>50% of any core).ResultsMRI-targeted TRUS-B detected PCa and sPCa in 36 (41.9%) and 30 (34.9%) men when compared with 19 (22.1%) and 14 (16.3%), respectively, men without mpMRI (P = 0.005 for both). In 9 cases (10.4%), MRI-targeted TRUS-B detected sPCa that was missed on standard cores. sPCa was present in 6 cases (6.9%) on standard cores but not the targeted cores. Multivariate analysis revealed that prostate imaging reporting and data system score and prostate-specific antigen density>0.15 ng/ml² were statistically significant predictors of significant cancer detection (odds ratio = 14.93, P<0.001 and odds ratio = 6.19, P = 0.02, respectively).ConclusionIn patients with prior negative TRUS-B finding, MRI-targeted TRUS-B improves the detection rate of all PCa and sPCa.     

Can the combination of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging and PSA-related indicators predict the prostate biopsy outcome?

To assess the value of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) for detecting and ruling out prostate cancer in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA). The basic information and bpMRI images of enrolled patients who took transperineal template saturate biopsy were retrospectively collected for analysis. Based on our results, we found that free/total PSA, and PI-RADS score were independent risk factors of PCa (p < .05), the PSA density, PI-RADS score were the independent risk factors of csPCa (p < .05). PI-RADS score threshold of 3 could achieve the highest Yonder index for predicting PCa, and PI-RADS score threshold of 4 could achieve the highest Yonder index for predicting csPCa. Therefore, we draw a conclusion that PI-RADSv2 score-based bpMRI could diminish the unnecessary prostate biopsies in patients with elevated PSA when combined with other PSA-related indicators.     

Current beliefs and practice patterns among urologists regarding prostate magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance–targeted biopsy

Introduction and objective

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance (MR) -targeted biopsy have a growing role in the screening and evaluation of prostate cancer. We aim to evaluate the current knowledge, attitude, and practice patterns of urologists regarding this new technique.

Transrectal ultrasound biopsy of the prostate: does it still have a role in prostate cancer diagnosis?

Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy of the prostate has been a standard diagnostic approach for prostate cancer over the past thirty years. Today, the role of TRUS biopsy is being challenged by transperineal (TP) prostate biopsy due to concerns over the safety and diagnostic yield of TRUS biopsy. TRUS biopsy still offers a convenient, reliable and accessible tool for diagnosing prostate cancer in the majority of patients. It continues to play a role in prostate cancer diagnosis, especially where hospital resource allocation is limited, including the public sector. TRUS biopsy has low rates of severe complications, although there remains room for improvement in current practice to improve the tolerability and reduce the incidence of post-biopsy infection.     

Age and gleason score upgrading between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy: Is this still true in the multiparametric resonance imaging era?

IntroductionSeveral studies have invariably shown that the risk of Grade Group (GG) upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy (RP) is higher in elderly men. Whether this is due to a real biological effect or to a diagnostic bias is still unknown. We hypothesized that the introduction of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has improved the diagnostic accuracy of PCa detection in older men thus reducing the risk of GG upgrading at RP reported in the pre-MRI era.Materials and MethodsWe selected 424 men who received a systematic plus targeted biopsy for a positive MRI and subsequent RP at two referral centers between 2013 and 2019. Upgrading was defined as an increase in GG at final pathology as compared to biopsy. Multivariable logistic regressions tested the risk of upgrading over increasing age according to any upgrading definition and after stratifying definitions according to GG group and biopsy type. Non-parametric functions explored the relationship between age and upgrading rate.ResultsMedian rate of upgrading was 17%. In multivariable models, while age was not associated with increased risk of GG upgrading (p=0.4). At non-parametric analyses, probability of upgrading slightly decreased with age, without reaching statistical significance. In subgroup analyses according to different upgrading definition and to biopsy type, age did not predict higher risk of upgrading regardless of outcome definitions (GG 1 to 2 P = 0.1; GG 2 to 3 P = 0.2; GG 3 to 4-5 P = 0.2) and in GG detected at TBx (OR 0.998, P = 0.8).ConclusionsWe showed that use of MRI has obliterated the association between older age and increased risk of upgrading mainly due to improved diagnostic approaches in this group of men. Therefore, it is likely that the effect of age and GG upgrading reported in previous studies in elderly men was due to misdiagnosis and lead-time bias in the pre-MRI era.