Nebivolol in High‐Risk,Obese African Americans With Stage 1 Hypertension: Effects on Blood Pressure,Vascular Compliance,and Endothelial Function

The authors sought to determine whether nebivolol treatment results in changes in blood pressure (BP), nitric oxide bioavailability, and vascular function in obese African Americans with recently diagnosed stage 1 hypertension. Forty‐three obese, hypertensive African Americans (mean BP: systolic, 148.8±14.3 mm Hg; diastolic, 90.4±8.2 mm Hg) were treated with nebivolol (5–10 mg/d) for 8 weeks. Primary outcomes were change in systolic and diastolic BP and efficacy in reaching normotensive BP. Mean systolic BP decreased by 9.2±14 mm Hg (P<.005) and diastolic BP decreased 6.8±9 mm Hg (P<.005) with 8 weeks of therapy. Significant improvements were seen in arterial compliance with nebivolol treatment as measured by aortic augmentation index (P<.005) and time to wave reflection (P=.013). Nebivolol treatment improved endothelial function as measured by flow‐mediated dilation (P<.005). Levels of erythrocyte cellular superoxide dismutase increased with nebivolol, indirectly suggesting increased bioavailability of nitric oxide (P<.005). Monotherapy with nebivolol in obese, hypertensive African Americans results in significant systolic and diastolic BP reduction by mechanisms that include improved vascular function and compliance.     

Treated hypertension and the white coat phenomenon: Office readings are inadequate measures of efficacy

To better define the prevalence of white coat hypertension (WCH) among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and to estimate the magnitude of white coat effect (WCE), before and after antihypertensive therapy, we gathered data from an open-label forced-titration study of a combination of antihypertensive drugs that was titrated sequentially, in the order amlodipine, olmesartan, and hydrochlorothiazide, over an 18-week period among 187 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. WCH was defined as daytime ambulatory blood pressure (BP) of 135/85 mm Hg or less, but clinic BP of 140/90 mm Hg or more. WCE was obtained as the mean difference between clinic and daytime ambulatory BP. At baseline, the prevalence of WCH was 12%; all but one subject had WCE of >10/5 mm Hg. After treatment, the prevalence of WCH had increased to 39% (P < .001). In the overall population, at baseline, the mean (±SD) WCE for systolic BP was 10.4 ± 10.9 mm Hg and 3.7 ± 8.6 mm Hg for diastolic BP. After treatment, the reduction in systolic WCE was 3.01 ± 0.93 (SE; P < .0001); no reduction was seen for diastolic WCE. Among patients treated with amlodipine-olmesartan combination, WCE at baseline was 11 mm Hg systolic and was attenuated to -0.9 mm Hg. Among patients treated with amlodipine-olmesartan-hydrochlorothiazide combination, systolic WCE was similar at baseline (10.1 mm Hg) and at end of therapy (8.1 mm Hg). Mean systolic difference between dual and triple therapy of 9.9 mm Hg, SE 2.98 was significant (P < .001). The drop in diastolic WCE from 6.4 with dual therapy to -1.2 with triple therapy was also significant (mean difference 7.6, SE 2.2; P < .001). In conclusion, the prevalence of WCH increases three-fold with treatment as a result of fewer patients having sustained hypertension. Thus, out-of-office BP monitoring especially among treated hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes is necessary to provide better assessment of overall BP and response to treatment.     

The addition of doxazosin to the therapeutic regimen of hypertensive patients inadequately controlled with other antihypertensive medications: a randomized,placebo-controlled study

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the use of doxazosin as an add-on therapy for inadequately controlled hypertension. Patients with a sitting diastolic blood pressure (BP) of 95 to 115 mm Hg received either doxazosin (n = 38) or placebo (n = 32) in addition to one or two baseline antihypertensive medications. After an upward titration period, patients were maintained on a fixed dosage of doxazosin (1 to 16 mg/day) or matching placebo for 4 weeks. Doxazosin add-on therapy led to improvements, compared with placebo, in sitting systolic BP (adjusted mean change = −20.9 v −8.5 mm Hg, P = .001), sitting diastolic BP (−13.0 v −8.1 mm Hg, P = .026), and standing systolic BP (−22.0 v −11.5 mm Hg, P = .011). Baseline antihypertensive therapy was gradually tapered or discontinued in patients who achieved a target reduction in BP (sitting diastolic BP of < 90 mm Hg in addition to a minimum improvement of 10 mm Hg in sitting diastolic BP over baseline) with add-on therapy (55% [n = 21] with doxazosin, 31% [n = 10] with placebo). Twelve patients in the doxazosin group maintained the target reduction in BP after complete withdrawal of their baseline antihypertensive therapy, compared with none in the placebo group. A small but statistically significant positive effect on the lipid profile was seen in the doxazosin group during add-on therapy. Doxazosin treatment was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile similar to that of placebo. These findings demonstrate that doxazosin add-on therapy is an effective, well-tolerated treatment strategy for patients with inadequately controlled hypertension.     

Similar Blood Pressure Values Across Racial and Economic Groups: Baseline Data from a Group Randomized Clinical Trial

This paper examines baseline characteristics from a prospective, cluster‐randomized trial in 32 primary care offices. Offices were first stratified by percentage of minorities and level of clinical pharmacy services and then randomized into 1 of 3 study groups. The only differences between randomized arms were for marital status (P=.03) and type of insurance coverage (P<.001). Blood pressures (BPs) were similar in Caucasians and minority patients, primarily blacks, who were hypertensive at baseline. On multivariate analyses, patients who were 65 years and older had higher systolic BP (152.4±14.3 mm Hg), but lower diastolic BP (77.3±11.8 mm Hg) compared with those younger than 65 years (147.4±15.0/88.6±10.6 mm Hg, P<.001 for both systolic and diastolic BP). Other factors significantly associated with higher systolic BP were a longer duration of hypertension (P=.04) and lower basal metabolic index (P=.011). Patients with diabetes or chronic kidney disease had a lower systolic BP than those without these conditions (P<.0001). BP was similar across racial and socioeconomic groups for patients with uncontrolled hypertension in primary care, suggesting that patients with uncontrolled hypertension and an established primary care relationship likely have different reasons for poor BP control than other patient populations.     

The effects of the spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor fostamatinib on ambulatory blood pressure in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results of the OSKIRA-ABPM (ambulatory blood pressure monitoring) randomized trial

Clinical trials of fostamatinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis showed blood pressure (BP) elevation using clinic measurements. The OSKIRA-ambulatory BP monitoring trial assessed the effect of fostamatinib on 24–hour ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. One hundred thirty–five patients were randomized to fostamatinib 100 mg twice daily (bid; n = 68) or placebo bid (n = 67) for 28 days. Ambulatory, clinic, and home BPs were measured at baseline and after 28 days of therapy. Primary end point was change from baseline in 24–hour mean SBP. Fostamatinib increased 24–hour mean SBP by 2.9 mm Hg (P = .023) and diastolic BP (DBP) by 3.5 mm Hg (P < .001) versus placebo. Clinic/home-measured BPs were similar to those observed with ambulatory BP monitoring. After treatment discontinuation (1 week), clinic BP values returned to baseline levels. Fostamatinib induced elevations in 24–hour mean ambulatory SBP and DBP. BP elevations resolved with fostamatinib discontinuation.     

Risk of Methylphenidate‐Induced Prehypertension in Normotensive Adult Smokers With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

The authors studied predictors of methylphenidate‐induced increases in blood pressure (BP). In this secondary analysis of a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled smoking cessation trial, nonhypertensive adult smokers with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder randomized to osmotic‐release oral system methylphenidate (OROS‐MPH) (n=115) were matched one‐to‐one on baseline systolic BP (SBP) (±5 mm Hg) with participants randomized to placebo (n=115) and followed for 10 weeks. In adjusted mixed linear models of SBP and diastolic BP (DBP), baseline normal SBP (P<.0001) and DBP (P<.0001) were associated with significant OROS‐MPH–induced increases compared with placebo, whereas significant increases were not observed in participants with baseline prehypertensive SBP (P=.27) and DBP (P=.79). Participants randomized to OROS‐MPH with baseline normal BP had increased odds of developing either systolic (odds ratio [OR], 3.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41–8.37; P=.006) or diastolic prehypertension (OR, 4.32; 95% CI, 1.56–14.0; P=.004) compared with placebo using simple logistic regression. The authors demonstrated an augmented OROS‐MPH–induced BP elevation and risk of prehypertension in adults with baseline normal BP. Significantly increased BP was not observed in adults with baseline prehypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012; 00:00–00. ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Antihypertensive efficacy,safety, and tolerability of the oral direct renin inhibitor aliskiren in patients with hypertension: a pooled analysis

The antihypertensive efficacy and safety of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren were assessed in a pooled analysis of data from seven randomized, multicenter studies. Data were available for 7,045 patients (mean age 52.5 to 59.8 years, 50.2 to 72.5% men) with mild-to-moderate hypertension (mean sitting diastolic blood pressure [msDBP] 95 to 109 mm Hg) over treatment durations of 6 to 8 weeks. In placebo-controlled trials, aliskiren reduced mean sitting systolic blood pressure/msDBP from baseline by 8.6 to 12.1/7.2 to 10.3 mm Hg (75 mg), 8.7 to 13.0/7.8 to 10.3 mm Hg (150 mg), 14.1 to 15.8/10.3 to 12.3 mm Hg (300 mg), and 15.7 to 15.8/11.5 to 12.5 mm Hg (600 mg), compared with 2.9 to 10.0/3.3 to 8.6 mm Hg for placebo. Aliskiren demonstrated comparable efficacy in men and women, in patients aged <65 years or ≥65 years, and lowered blood pressure (BP) effectively in all racial subgroups. Combination of aliskiren 150 mg or 300 mg with ramipril, amlodipine, or hydrochlorothiazide provided significant additional BP reductions compared with the respective monotherapies. The overall incidence of adverse events with aliskiren monotherapy was similar to placebo (39.8% vs. 40.2%, respectively). The incidence of diarrhea with aliskiren was higher than placebo due to a significantly higher rate with aliskiren 600 mg (P < .0001 vs. placebo). In conclusion, aliskiren 150 mg or 300 mg provides highly effective and consistent BP lowering with placebo-like tolerability in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.     

Association of Isolated Systolic,Isolated Diastolic,and Systolic‐Diastolic Masked Hypertension With Carotid Artery Intima‐Media Thickness

Masked hypertension (MH) is associated with advanced target organ damage. However, patients with MH constitute a group of individuals with heterogeneous characteristics concerning their ambulatory blood pressure (BP) status. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of isolated systolic MH, isolated diastolic MH, and systolic/diastolic MH with carotid artery intima‐media thickness (CIMT). A total of 101 patients with MH underwent carotid artery ultrasonographic measurements. The patients were divided into three groups according to office and daytime BP values: isolated systolic MH, isolated diastolic MH, and systolic/diastolic MH. Patients with isolated systolic (n=36) (0.771 mm) and systolic/diastolic MH (n=37) (0.775 mm) had significantly (P<.05) higher CIMT values than those with isolated diastolic MH (n=28) (0.664 mm), even after adjustment for baseline characteristics and risk factors. Patients with isolated systolic and systolic/diastolic MH presented significantly higher CIMT values compared with patients with isolated diastolic MH.     

Prediction of Blood Pressure and Blood Pressure Change With a Genetic Risk Score

The authors investigated whether a genetic risk score (GRS) constructed of 32 single nucleotide polymorphisms would predict incident hypertension and blood pressure (BP) change over time in a population cohort during an 11‐year follow‐up (n=5402 at baseline, 3266 at follow‐up). In multivariable models, GRS was associated with higher systolic/diastolic BP values at baseline (β±standard error [SE], 1.04±0.14/1.11±0.13 mm Hg; P<.0001 for both) and at reinvestigation (β±SE, 0.84±0.18/0.79±0.16 mm Hg; P<.0001 for both). Among participants who were normotensive at baseline (n=2045), GRS was not independently associated with systolic/diastolic BP change over time (β±SE, 0.16±0.18/0.20±0.18 mm Hg; P≥.28 for both). In participants in the top tertile of the GRS, as compared with the bottom tertile, the predicted increase in systolic/diastolic BP was 1.18±0.78/0.70±0.49 mm Hg (P=.046/.15) greater and the odds ratio for incident hypertension was 33% higher (P=.03). These data show that GRS is strongly associated with BP but weakly associated with BP increase and incident hypertension in a late middle‐aged population.     

Effect of Allopurinol on Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013; 15:435–442 ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Allopurinol is a potent xanthine oxidase inhibitor that is used in hyperuricemic patients to prevent gout. It has also been shown to decrease cardiovascular complications in a myriad of cardiovascular conditions. However, studies have reported conflicting evidence on its effects on blood pressure (BP). A systematic review was conducted using Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for all the longitudinal studies that assessed the efficacy of allopurinol on systolic and diastolic BP. A total of 10 clinical studies with 738 participants were included in the analysis. Compared with the control group, systolic BP decreased by 3.3 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4–5.3 mm Hg; P=.001) and diastolic BP decreased by 1.3 mm Hg (95% CI, 0.1–2.5 mm Hg; P=.03) in patients treated with allopurinol. When analysis was restricted to the higher‐quality randomized controlled trials, similar changes in systolic and diastolic BPs were found: 3.3 mm Hg (95% CI, 0.8–5.8 mm Hg; P<.001) and 1.4 mm Hg (95% CI, 0.1–2.7 mm Hg; P=.04), respectively. Allopurinol is associated with a small but significant reduction in BP. This effect can be potentially exploited to aid in controlling BP in hypertensive patients with hyperuricemia.     

Which blood pressure measurement,systolic or diastolic,better predicts future hypertension in normotensive young adults?

The impact of age‐related differences in blood pressure (BP) components on new‐onset hypertension is not known. A follow‐up examination of 93 303 normotensive individuals (mean age 41.1 years) who underwent a health checkup in 2005 was conducted every year for 8 years. The primary end point was new‐onset hypertension (systolic BP [SBP]/diastolic BP [DBP] ≥140/90 mm Hg and/or the initiation of antihypertensive medications with self‐reported hypertension). During the mean 4.9 years of follow‐up, 14 590 subjects developed hypertension. The impact of DBP on the risk of developing hypertension compared with optimal BP (SBP <120 mm Hg and DBP <80 mm Hg) was significantly greater than that of SBP in subjects younger than 50 years (hazard ratios, 17.5 for isolated diastolic high‐normal vs 10.5 for isolated systolic high‐normal [P<.001]; 8.0 for isolated diastolic normal vs 4.1 for isolated systolic normal [P<.001]). Among the subjects 50 years and older, the corresponding effects of DBP and SBP were similar. Regarding the risk of new‐onset hypertension, high DBP is more important than SBP in younger adults (<50 years) with normal or high‐normal BP.     

Add‐On Use of Eplerenone Is Effective for Lowering Home and Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Drug‐Resistant Hypertension

The authors aimed to investigate the blood pressure (BP)–lowering ability of eplerenone in drug‐resistant hypertensive patients. A total of 57 drug‐resistant hypertensive patients whose home BP was ≥135/85 mm Hg were investigated. The patients were randomized to either an eplerenone group or a control group and followed for 12 weeks. The efficacy was evaluated by clinic, home, and ambulatory BP monitoring. Urinary albumin, pulse wave velocity, and flow‐mediated vasodilation (FMD) were also evaluated. Home morning systolic BP (148±15 vs 140±15 mm Hg) and evening systolic BP (137±16 vs 130±16 mm Hg) were significantly lowered in the eplerenone group (n=35) compared with baseline (both P<.05), while unchanged in the control group (n=22). BP reductions in the eplerenone group were most pronounced for ambulatory awake systolic BP (P=.04), awake diastolic BP (P=.004), and 24‐hour diastolic BP (P=.02). FMD was significantly improved in the eplerenone group. In patients with drug‐resistant hypertension, add‐on use of eplerenone was effective in lowering BP, especially home and ambulatory awake BP.     

Does Systolic Blood Pressure Response to Lifestyle Intervention Indicate Metabolic Risk and Health‐Related Quality‐of‐Life Improvement Over 1 Year?

The purpose of this study was to determine whether responders (minimum 4‐mm Hg reduction of systolic blood pressure [BP]) at 24 weeks) to a 52‐week lifestyle intervention had greater changes in metabolic risk factors and health‐related quality of life than nonresponders. Participants (N=126; age, 57.4 [9.1] years) had waist circumference (WC), resting BP, glycated hemoglobin, lipids, and fitness assessed at baseline and at 12, 24, and 52 months. The 36‐item short‐form survey was administered to assess HRQOL. At baseline, responders had higher mental health scores (P=.04) and systolic and diastolic BPs (P<.001) than nonresponders. Across 52 weeks, responders also had greater improvements in diastolic BP (P<.001), WC (P=.01), and maximal oxygen uptake (P=.04) compared with nonresponders. Participants with clinically important changes in systolic BP at 24 weeks had greater metabolic improvements across 52 weeks, compared with those without clinically important systolic BP changes.     

Effects of Cholesterol Reduction on BP Response to Mental Stress in Patients With High Cholesterol

Impaired endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation has been reported in patients with high cholesterol (HC), but the systemic effects of elevated cholesterol on blood pressure (BP) and BP reactivity to stress have not been studied. We examined the BP response to a standard mental arithmetic test (MAT) in 37 healthy, normotensive HC subjects and 33 normal cholesterol controls (NC). Both groups had similar age, body mass index, and gender distribution. HC had slightly higher systolic BP at baseline (122 v 118 mm Hg, P < .05) than NC and systolic BP response during MAT was significantly higher in HC compared to NC (18 ± 8 v 10 ± 5 mm Hg, P < .05). Maximal changes in systolic BP were significantly correlated with cholesterol (R = 0.41, P < .001), whereas heart rate and diastolic BP changes were unrelated to serum cholesterol. To confirm that BP reactivity was dependent on cholesterol, MAT was repeated after treatment with 20 mg/day of lovastatin, a hepatic hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, for 6 weeks using a cross-over design in 26 HC subjects. Lovastatin significantly altered lipid profiles (−26% total cholesterol, +8% HDL, −34% LDL). A small decrease in systolic BP at baseline (−3 mm Hg, P = NS) and significantly lower systolic BP (−8 mm Hg, P < .05) during MAT was observed after the treatment with lovastatin. In conclusion, patients with high cholesterol had an exaggerated systolic BP response to MAT. Decreased BP reactivity during HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor therapy suggests that lowering cholesterol may have a role in the overall control of BP.     

Regression to the mean in home blood pressure: Analyses of the BP GUIDE study

The aim of our study was to estimate the size of regression to the mean with home blood pressure (BP) monitoring and compare with that for office BP. Office and home BP measures were obtained from the BP GUIDE (value of central Blood Pressure for GUIDing managEment for hypertension) study, in which 286 patients had BP measured every 3 months for 12 months. Patients were categorized by 10 mm Hg strata of baseline BP, and regression to the mean measures was calculated for home and office BP. High baseline home BP readings tended to be lower on long‐term follow‐up, and low baseline readings tended to be higher. For example, patients in the group with mean baseline home systolic BP ≥ 150 mm Hg had a mean baseline systolic BP of 156 mm Hg, which fell to 143 mm Hg at 12 months; and patients in the group with mean baseline home systolic BP < 120 mm Hg had a mean baseline systolic BP of 113 mm Hg which rose to 120 mm Hg at 12 months. Similar patterns were seen in intervention and control groups, and for diastolic BP. The regression dilution ratio for home systolic BP and diastolic BP was 0.52 and 0.64, respectively, compared to 0.40 and 0.55 for office systolic BP and diastolic BP, respectively. Home BP is subject to regression to the mean to a similar degree as office BP. These findings have implications for the diagnosis and management of hypertension using home BP.     

Changes in Hypertension Treatment in the Yaroslavl Region of Russia: Improvements Observed Between 2 Cross‐Sectional Surveys

This prospective before‐and‐after survey of hypertensive patients visiting government‐run outpatient health facilities in the Yaroslavl Region of Russia assessed blood pressure (BP)–related endpoints following initiation of a comprehensive health system improvement program for hypertension. Two cross‐sectional surveys, one at baseline and the other approximately 1 year after program initiation, evaluated the primary measure of BP control rate. Secondary measures included mean BP levels and distribution, cardiovascular risk factors, and associated conditions, heart rate levels, and antihypertensive therapy. From the 2011 survey (n=1794) to the 2012 survey (n=2992), BP control rate (<140/90 mm Hg) significantly increased from 16.8% to 23.0%, reflecting a 37% relative improvement (P<.0001). Mean BP level was significantly reduced from 151/90 mm Hg to 147/88 mm Hg (P<.0001). Severe uncontrolled hypertension (systolic BP ≥180 mm Hg) was reduced from 9.7% to 6.4% (P<.0001). Implementing a guidelines‐based treatment protocol with medical and patient education programs resulted in physician behavior change and improved patient BP control.     

Elevated Diastolic,But Not Systolic,Blood Pressure Measured in the Emergency Department Predicts Future Development of Hypertension in Normotensive Individuals

Elevated blood pressure (BP) is reported in many individuals without hypertension presenting to the emergency department (ED). Whether this condition represents a transient state or is predictive for the development of future hypertension is unknown. This observational prospective study investigated patients admitted to an ED without a diagnosis of hypertension in whom BP values were ≥140/90 mm Hg. The primary outcome was development of hypertension during follow‐up. Overall, 195 patients were recruited and at the end of follow‐up (average 30.14±15.96 months), 142 patients were diagnosed with hypertension (73%). The mean age (50±12.25 vs 48.31±13.9, P=.419) and sex distribution (78 men/64 women vs 24 men/20 women, respectively; P=.148) were similar in both groups. There were significant differences in systolic and diastolic BP between those who developed hypertension on follow‐up and those who did not (177.6 mm Hg±22.6/106.1 mm Hg±16.9 vs 168.6 mm Hg±18/95.2 mm Hg±12.2; P=.011 for systolic BP, P<.001 for diastolic BP). In multivariate analysis the only significant predictive factor for the development of hypertension was diastolic hypertension recorded in the ED (P=.03). Elevated diastolic, but not systolic, BP among patients presenting to the ED is associated with future development of hypertension in previously normotensive individuals.     

The Effects of Natural Antioxidants from Tomato Extract in Treated but Uncontrolled Hypertensive Patients

Purpose  To evaluate the effect of adding tomato extract to the treatment regime of moderate hypertensives with uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) levels. Methods  Fifty four subjects with moderate HT treated with one or two antihypertensive drugs were recruited and 50 entered two double blind cross-over treatment periods of 6 weeks each, with standardized tomato extract or identical placebo. Plasma concentrations of lycopene, nitrite and nitrate were measured and correlated with BP changes. Results  There was a significant reduction of systolic BP after 6 weeks of tomato extract supplementation, from 145.8 ± 8.7 to 132.2 ± 8.6 mmHg (p < 0.001) and 140.4 ± 13.3 to 128.7 ± 10.4 mmHg (p < 0.001) in the two groups accordingly. Similarly, there was a decline in diastolic BP from 82.1 ± 7.2 to 77.9 ± 6.8 mmHg (p = 0.001) and from 80.1 ± 7.9 to 74.2 ± 8.5 mmHg (p = 0.001). There was no significant change in systolic and diastolic BP during the placebo period. Serum lycopene level increased from 0.11 ± 0.09 at baseline, to 0.30 ± 01.3 μmol/L after tomato extract therapy (p < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between systolic BP and lycopene levels (r = −0.49, p < 0.001). Conclusions  Tomato extract when added to patients treated with low doses of ACE inhibition, calcium channel blockers or their combination with low dose diuretics, had a clinically significant effect—reduction of BP by more than 10 mmHg systolic and more than 5 mmHg diastolic pressure. No side-effects to treatment were recorded and the compliance with treatment was high. The significant correlation between systolic blood pressure values and level of lycopene suggest the possibility of cause–effect relationships.     

Effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors on blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors represent a new class of antihyperglycemic agents that block renal sodium and glucose reabsorption and may reduce blood pressure (BP). We assessed the BP lowering ability of these agents using meta-analytic techniques. PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Central were searched through October 2013. We included fully published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus and reported change in systolic and/or diastolic BP. Subgroup analyses were performed for placebo-controlled trials and those with active controls. We also conducted meta-regression to assess for a dose-response effect, and whether baseline BP, changes in body weight, heart rate, and hematocrit were associated with the BP effects. Twenty-seven RCTs (n = 12,960 participants) were included. SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced both systolic BP (weighted mean difference, −4.0 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, −4.4 to −3.5) and diastolic BP (weighted mean difference, −1.6 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, −1.9 to −1.3) from baseline. Only canagliflozin had a significant dose-response relationship with SBP (P = .008). Significant reductions in body weight and hematocrit were seen with the SGLTs. SGLTs had no significant effect on the incidence of orthostatic hypotension (P > .05). SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduce BP in patients with type 2 diabetes.     

Early morning home blood pressure control among treated patients with controlled office blood pressure

Elevated morning blood pressure (BP) has a significantly increased risk of cardiovascular events, so morning BP is of substantial clinical importance for the management of hypertension. This study aimed to evaluate early morning BP control and its determines among treated patients with controlled office BP. From May to October 2018, 600 treated patients with office BP < 140/90 mm Hg were recruited from hypertension clinics. Morning BP was measured at home for 7 days. Morning home systolic blood pressure (SBP) increased by an average of 11.5 mm Hg and that morning home diastolic blood pressure (DBP) increased by an average of 5.6 mm Hg compared with office BP. Morning home SBP, DBP, and their moving average were more likely to be lower among patients with a office SBP < 120 mm Hg than among patients with a office SBP ranging from 120 to 129 mm Hg and from 130 to 139 mm Hg (P < .001). A total of 45% of patients had early morning BP < 135/85 mm Hg. The following factors were significantly correlated with morning BP control: male sex, age of <65 years, absence of habitual snoring, no drinking, adequate physical activity, no habit of high salt intake, office BP < 120/80 mm Hg, and combination of a calcium channel blocker (CCB) and angiotensin receptor blocker or angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor (ARB/ACEI). Less than half of patients with controlled office BP had controlled morning BP and that positive changes may be related to an office BP < 120/80 mm Hg, combination of a CCB and ACEI/ARB and a series of lifestyle adjustments.