Liraglutide is effective and well tolerated in combination with an oral antidiabetic drug in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, 52‐week,open‐label,parallel‐group trial

Introduction

The safety and efficacy of liraglutide in combination with an oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) compared with combination of two OADs were assessed in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

Materials and Methods

This was a 52‐week, open‐label, parallel‐group trial in which patients whose type 2 diabetes was inadequately controlled with a single OAD (glinide, metformin, α‐glucosidase inhibitor or thiazolidinedione) were randomized 2:1 to either pretrial OAD in combination with liraglutide 0.9 mg/day (liraglutide group; n = 240) or pretrial OAD in combination with an additional OAD (additional OAD group; n = 120). The primary outcome measure was the incidence of adverse events (AEs).

Results

Overall, 86.3% of patients in the liraglutide group and 85.0% of patients in the additional OAD group experienced AEs; these were similar in nature and severity. Adverse event rates were 361 and 331 per 100 patient‐years of exposure, respectively. Confirmed hypoglycemia was rare (seven episodes in two patients on liraglutide, and two in two patients on additional OAD). There were no reported pancreatitis events, and no unexpected safety signals were identified. Mean reductions in glycosylated hemoglobin were significantly greater in the liraglutide group than the additional OAD group [estimated mean treatment difference −0.27% (95% confidence interval (CI) −0.44, −0.09; P = 0.0026)]; reductions in mean fasting plasma glucose levels were also greater with liraglutide [estimated mean difference −5.47 mg/dL (−0.30 mmol/L; 95% CI: −10.83, −0.10; P = 0.0458)].

Conclusions

Liraglutide was well tolerated and effective as combination therapy with an OAD in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.     

Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors are effective in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients with sustained endogenous insulin‐secreting capacity,a higher body mass index and insulin resistance

Aims/Introduction

Recently, dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) inhibitors have become available in Japan. It has not yet been clarified what clinical parameters could discriminate DPP‐4 inhibitor‐effective patients from DPP‐4 inhibitor‐ineffective patients.

Materials and Methods

We reviewed 33 consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes admitted to Osaka University Hospital for glycemic control. All of the patients were treated with medical nutrition therapy plus insulin therapy to improve fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and postprandial glucose below 150 and 200 mg/dL, respectively. After insulin secretion and insulin resistance were evaluated, insulin was replaced by DPP‐4 inhibitors. The efficacy of DPP‐4 inhibitors was determined according to whether glycemic control was maintained at the target levels.

Results

Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors were effective in 16 of 33 patients. DPP‐4 inhibitor‐effective patients were younger than DPP‐4 inhibitor‐ineffective patients. Body mass index (BMI) was significantly higher in DPP‐4 inhibitor‐effective patients. Endogeneous insulin‐secreting capacity, including insulinogenic index (II), fasting plasma C‐peptide (F‐CPR) and C‐peptide index (CPI), was more sustained in DPP‐4 inhibitor‐effective patients than DPP‐4 inhibitor‐ineffective patients. Insulin resistance evaluated by homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR) was significantly higher in DPP‐4 inhibitor‐effective patients than DPP‐4 inhibitor‐ineffective patients. In receiver operating characteristic analyses, the cut‐off values for predicting the efficacy of DPP‐4 inhibitors were 0.07 for II, 1.5 ng/mL for F‐CPR, 1.0 for CPI, 23.0 kg/m² for BMI, 1.3 for HOMA‐IR and 67.5 years for age.

Conclusions

Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors were effective in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients with sustained endogenous insulin‐secreting capacity, a higher BMI and insulin resistance.     

Evaluation of insulin regimens as an effective option for glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: A propensity score‐matched cohort study across Japan (JDDM31)

Aims/Introduction

We evaluated the long‐term efficacy of insulin regimens in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and poor glycemic control despite oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD).

Materials and Methods

We carried out a propensity score‐matched cohort study using the CoDiC^® database of the Japan Diabetes Data Management Study Group across 54 institutions in Japan from 2005 to 2010. A total of 10,854 patients on OAD in 2005 were studied, and 1,253 patients (11.5%) were treated with insulin until 2010. The changes in insulin regimens and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were analyzed over this study period.

Results

Propensity score matching showed no differences in the baseline patient characteristics. A total of 96 patients transferred to insulin, and HbA1c gradually and significantly decreased in the patients on a twice‐daily premixed preparation of rapid‐acting human‐insulin analogs (twice‐daily MIX) and basal–bolus therapy with rapid‐acting human‐insulin analogs (RA) plus long‐acting insulin analog (LA; P < 0.001). A total of 418 patients had insulin added to OAD treatment, and HbA1c decreased in the patients with a twice‐daily MIX (P < 0.001), but HbA1c did not differ from the baseline values in the patients on basal LA (P = 0.497). The mean decline in HbA1c at the end of the study was therefore larger in the patients receiving twice‐daily MIX than in the patients receiving basal LA (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The present study could suggest the potential loss of opportunity for many patients treated using basal LA to have received alternative insulin regimens and to achieve better glycemic control.     

Efficacy of α‐glucosidase inhibitors combined with dipeptidyl‐peptidase‐4 inhibitor (alogliptin) for glucose fluctuation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus by continuous glucose monitoring

Aims/Introduction

The combination therapy of dipeptidyl‐peptidase (DPP)‐4 inhibitor and α‐glucosidase inhibitors (α‐GIs) is highly effective in suppressing postprandial hyperglycemia. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of voglibose and miglitol on glucose fluctuation, when used in combination with DPP‐4 inhibitor by using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).

Materials and Methods

In a randomized cross‐over study, 16 patients with type 2 diabetes who presented with postprandial hyperglycemia despite alogliptin (25 mg) were treated with voglibose (0.9 mg) or miglitol (150 mg). We measured standard deviation (SD); mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), and mean, minimum and maximum glucose measured by CGM during three phases (alogliptin monotherapy, dual therapy of alogliptin and voglibose, and dual therapy of alogliptin and miglitol). The primary outcome measure was SD between α‐GIs.

Results

SD was significantly improved by the addition of either voglibose (18.9 ± 10.1) or miglitol (19.6 ± 8.2) to alogliptin monotherapy (36.2 ± 8.7). MAGE improved significantly with the addition of either voglibose (57.5 ± 26.1, P < 0.01) or miglitol (64.6 ± 26.2, P < 0.01) to alogliptin monotherapy (101.5 ± 21.5). There was no significant difference in glucose fluctuation between α‐GIs. There were no differences between two groups in mean (132.6 ± 21.4 and 138.7 ± 25.4) and maximum (184.3 ± 48.7 and 191.9 ± 38.3). The minimum glucose under alogliptin plus voglibose (94.9 ± 20.2) was significantly lower than that under alogliptin and miglitol (105.3 ± 21.0).

Conclusions

Glucose fluctuation was improved by the addition of voglibose or miglitol to alogliptin. Glucose fluctuations and postprandial hyperglycemia were similar between α‐GIs. This trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (no. UMIN R000010028).     

Insulin degludec compared with insulin glargine in insulin‐naïve patients with type 2 diabetes: A 26‐week,randomized, controlled,Pan‐Asian,treat‐to‐target trial

Introduction

Insulin degludec (IDeg) is an ultra‐long‐acting basal insulin with a consistent action profile of >42 h. This trial compared the efficacy and safety of IDeg with insulin glargine (IGlar) in insulin‐naïve Asian patients with type 2 diabetes.

Materials and Methods

In this multinational, 26‐week, open‐label, treat‐to‐target trial, 435 participants (202 females, 233 males; mean age 58.6 years; mean body mass index 25 kg/m²; mean glycated hemoglobin [HbA_1c] 8.5%) were randomized (2:1) to IDeg or IGlar, each administered once daily with ≥1 oral antidiabetic drug(s) (OAD).

Results

After 26 weeks, HbA_1c had decreased by 1.24 and 1.35% in the IDeg and IGlar groups, respectively (treatment difference [IDeg – IGlar] 0.11%, 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.03 to 0.24), confirming non‐inferiority. Rates of overall confirmed hypoglycemia were similar for IDeg and IGlar during the full trial period (3.0 vs 3.7 episodes/patient‐year of exposure [PYE]; rate ratio [RR] 0.82, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.11, P = 0.20), but significantly lower (by 37%) for IDeg during the maintenance period (from week 16 onward; RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.94, P = 0.02). No significant difference in the rate of nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia was found between IDeg and IGlar in the full trial period (0.8 vs 1.2 episodes/PYE; RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.04, P = 0.07) or maintenance period (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.00, P = 0.05). Adverse event rates were similar between treatments.

Conclusions

Initiating insulin therapy with IDeg in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes, inadequately controlled with OADs, provides similar improvements in long‐term glycemic control to IGlar, but at a significantly lower rate of overall confirmed hypoglycemia once stable glycemic control and insulin dosing are achieved. This trial was registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (no. NCT01059799).     

Combination therapy with an angiotensin‐converting‐enzyme inhibitor and an angiotensin II receptor antagonist ameliorates microinflammation and oxidative stress in patients with diabetic nephropathy

Aims/Introduction

Recent studies have pointed to the effectiveness of combination therapy with an angiotensin‐converting‐enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) for diabetic nephropathy. However, some controversy over this combination treatment remains and the mechanisms underlying its renoprotective effects have not been fully clarified. Therefore, we compared the renoprotective effects of imidapril (ACEI) and losartan (ARB) combination therapy with losartan monotherapy in patients with diabetic nephropathy. We also compared the anti‐inflammatory and anti‐oxidative stress effects of these two treatments.

Materials and Methods

A total of 32 Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy were enrolled. Patients were randomized to either 100 mg/day losartan (n = 16) or 50 mg/day losartan plus 5 mg/day imidapril (n = 16). We evaluated clinical parameters, serum concentrations of high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hs‐CRP), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule‐1 (sICAM‐1), interleukin‐18 (IL‐18) and monocyte chemotactic protein‐1 (MCP‐1), and the urinary concentrations of IL‐18, MCP‐1 and 8‐hydroxy‐2′‐deoxyguanosine (8‐OHdG) at 24 and 48 weeks after starting treatment.

Results

Blood pressure was not significantly different between the two groups. The serum levels of hs‐CRP, sICAM‐1 and IL‐18, as well as urinary excretion of albumin, IL‐18 and 8‐OHdG decreased significantly in the combination therapy group at 48 weeks. The percent decreases in serum IL‐18 concentrations and urinary IL‐18 and 8‐OHdG were significantly greater in the combination therapy group than in the monotherapy group.

Conclusions

Combination therapy with an ACEI and an ARB could be beneficial for treating diabetic nephropathy through its anti‐inflammatory and anti‐oxidative stress effects.     

Replication study for the association of rs391300 in SRR and rs17584499 in PTPRD with susceptibility to type 2 diabetes in a Japanese population

Aims/Introduction

Genetic risk variants for type 2 diabetes; rs391300‐G in SRR and rs17584499‐T in PTPRD, have been identified by a genome‐wide association study using Han Chinese individuals living in Taiwan. In an attempt to know the effects of these two variants in conferring susceptibility to type 2 diabetes in the Japanese, we carried out a replication study for the association of the two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with type 2 diabetes in a Japanese population.

Materials and Methods

We genotyped 11,530 Japanese individuals (8,552 type 2 diabetes patients and 2,978 controls) for rs391300 and rs17584499, and analyzed the association of these two SNPs with type 2 diabetes by logistic regression analysis.

Results

Neither of the variants was associated with susceptibility to type 2 diabetes in the Japanese population (rs391300‐G: odds ratio [OR] = 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91–1.04; P = 0.44; rs17584499‐T: OR = 1.04; 95% CI 0.96–1.14; P = 0.34). Adjustment or stratified analysis for age, sex and body mass index (BMI) did not affect the association of these variants with the disease. We did not observe a significant association of the SNPs with any metabolic traits, BMI, fasting plasma glucose, homeostasis model assessment of β‐cell function (HOMA‐β) and HOMA of insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR) (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Neither rs391300 nor rs17584499 had a significant effect on conferring susceptibility to type 2 diabetes in the Japanese population.     

Correlations of serum visfatin and metabolisms of glucose and lipid in women with gestational diabetes mellitus

Aims/Introduction

Visfatin is a newly discovered adipocytokine hormone, which exerts an insulin‐like effect by binding to the insulin receptor‐1. However, the role of visfatin in human gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) remains controversial. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the correlation between serum visfatin and metabolism of glucose and lipid in GDM.

Materials and Methods

This was a prospective study. A total of 38 GDM patients and 35 age‐ and body mass index‐matched controls were studied between January 2012 and October 2013. Fasting serum levels of visfatin, fasting plasma glucose, hemoglobin A1c and lipid profile were measured. Two‐tailed t‐tests and Pearson''s correlation coefficient were used to analyze the data.

Results

Perinatal visfatin levels were negatively correlated with fasting plasma glucose, insulin resistance index and triglycerides in controls (r = −0.47, −0.51, −0.57, respectively; P < 0.05), and positively correlated with high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (r = 0.32, P < 0.05). A positive correlation with visfatin level only appeared in weight gain and body mass index in women with GDM (r = 0.36, 0.45, respectively; P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Visfatin appears to be involved in glucose and lipid metabolism regulation and insulin resistance, suggesting a role in GDM pathogenesis.     

Usefulness of the insulin tolerance test in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving insulin therapy

Aims/Introduction

To establish the validity of the plasma glucose disappearance rate (KITT), derived from an insulin‐tolerance test (ITT), for evaluating the insulin sensitivity of patients with type 2 diabetes after insulin therapy.

Materials and Methods

In the first arm of the study, 19 patients with poorly controlled diabetes were treated with insulin and underwent an ITT and a euglycemic clamp test (clamp‐IR). The relationship between the insulin resistance index, as assessed by both the clamp‐IR and KITT tests, was examined. In the second arm of the study, the relationships between KITT values and various clinical parameters were investigated in 135 patients with poorly controlled diabetes, after achieving glycemic control with insulin.

Results

In study 1, a close correlation between KITT and the average glucose infusion rate during the last 30 min of the standard clamp‐IR test (M‐value) was noted (P < 0.001). In study 2, body mass index (P = 0.0011), waist circumference (P = 0.0004), visceral fat area (P = 0.0011) and the log‐transformed homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance value (P = 0.0003) were negatively correlated with the log‐transformed KITT. High‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (P = 0.0183), low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (P = 0.0121) and adiponectin (P = 0.0384) levels were positively correlated with the log‐transformed KITT.

Conclusions

The ITT is a valid and useful test for evaluating the insulin sensitivity of patients with diabetes, even after treatment with insulin.     

Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes switched from glinides

Aims/Introduction

The efficacy and safety of sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)‐4 inhibitor, were compared with those of glinides in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

Materials and Methods

The participants were 82 patients with type 2 diabetes (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] ≥6.0% and <10%) under treatment with glinides for glucose control. The participants were randomly assigned to a group (n = 44) receiving continuous treatment with glinides and a group (n = 38) switched to sitagliptin. Patients were followed for 12 weeks to evaluate glucose control. A meal tolerance test was carried out in weeks 0 and 12 to examine the pancreatic secretory response to postprandial hyperglycemia.

Results

The changes in HbA1c from week 0 to week 12 were −0.25 and −0.05% in the sitagliptin and glinide groups, respectively, with a significant improvement with sitagliptin. The differences in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycoalbumin and 1,5‐anhydroglucitol between the two groups were 14.2 mg/dL, 0.7% and 1.7 μg/mL, respectively, showing significant improvements with sitagliptin. In the meal tolerance test, glucose at 0 min was lower in the sitagliptin group; however, there were no differences in glucose elevation at 30 and 60 min compared with 0 min. Plasma insulin and glucagon secretion at week 12 were significantly lower than at baseline in the sitagliptin group. Adverse events including hypoglycemia did not differ between the groups.

Conclusions

FPG decreased and glucose control improved in patients who switched from glinides to sitagliptin. Sitagliptin decreased secretion of insulin and glucagon in a meal tolerance test compared with glinides, whereas the agents showed similar inhibition of postprandial hyperglycemia. This trial was registered with UMIN (UMIN‐CTR no. 000003479).     

Postprandial C‐peptide to glucose ratio as a predictor of β‐cell function and its usefulness for staged management of type 2 diabetes

Aims/Introduction

Type 2 diabetes is characterized by progressive deterioration of β‐cell function. Recently, it was suggested that the C‐peptide‐to‐glucose ratio after oral glucose ingestion is a better predictor of β‐cell mass than that during fasting. We investigated whether postprandial C‐peptide‐to‐glucose ratio (PCGR) reflects β‐cell function, and its clinical application for management of type 2 diabetes.

Materials and Methods

We carried out a two‐step retrospective study of 919 Korean participants with type 2 diabetes. In the first step, we evaluated the correlation of PCGR level with various markers for β‐cell function in newly diagnosed and drug‐naïve patients after a mixed meal test. In the second step, participants with well‐controlled diabetes (glycated hemoglobin <7%) were divided into four groups according to treatment modality (group I: insulin, group II: sulfonylurea and/or dipeptityl peptidase IV inhibitor, group III: metformin and/or thiazolidinedione and group IV: diet and exercise group).

Results

In the first step, PCGR was significantly correlated with various insulin secretory indices. Furthermore, PCGR showed better correlation with glycemic indices than homeostatic model assessment of β‐cell function (HOMA‐β). In the second step, the PCGR value significantly increased according to the following order: group I, II, III, and IV after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index and duration of diabetes. The cut‐off values of PCGR for separating each group were 1.457, 2.870 and 3.790, respectively (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

We suggest that PCGR might be a useful marker for β‐cell function and an ancillary parameter in the choice of antidiabetic medication in type 2 diabetes.     

Efficacy and safety of 40 mg or 60 mg duloxetine in Japanese adults with diabetic neuropathic pain: Results from a randomized, 52‐week,open‐label study

Introduction

To examine the long‐term efficacy and safety of duloxetine in the treatment of Japanese patients with diabetic neuropathic pain, we carried out a 52‐week, randomized, open‐label extension of a 12‐week, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study.

Materials and Methods

Japanese adults with diabetic neuropathic pain who completed the double‐blind study were eligible for this long‐term study, carried out at 71 sites in Japan (March 2008 to March 2010). Participants (n = 258) were re‐randomized (1:1) to 40 mg/day or 60 mg/day duloxetine. Pain (Brief Pain Inventory severity and interference), quality of life (Patient''s Global Impression of Improvement), and safety (primary outcome; adverse events, vital signs, metabolic measures) were measured.

Results

Significant (P < 0.0001) and sustained improvements (change ± standard deviation; n = 257) were observed in Brief Pain Inventory severity (average pain score −2.1 ± 1.7). Improvements were also seen in Brief Pain Inventory interference (mean of subscores −0.96 ± 1.52) and Patient''s Global Impression of Improvement (−0.9 ± 1.1) scores; these scores decreased significantly (P < 0.0001) during the long‐term study. Frequently reported adverse events included somnolence (13.6%), constipation (13.2%) and nausea (10.5%). Increases were observed in plasma glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin and total cholesterol levels, and in bodyweight and heart rate; however, none of these were clinically meaningful. Overall, there were no clinically significant safety concerns.

Conclusions

This is the first publication of a long‐term study carried out in Asia with an entirely Japanese patient population to suggest that long‐term duloxetine therapy for diabetic neuropathic pain is effective and has an acceptable safety profile.     

Interactive effects of an isocaloric high‐protein diet and resistance exercise on body composition,ghrelin, and metabolic and hormonal parameters in untrained young men: A randomized clinical trial

Aims/Introduction

The interactive effects of resistance training and dietary protein on hormonal responses in adults are not clear and remain controversial. We tested the effect of an isocaloric high‐protein diet on body composition, ghrelin, and metabolic and hormonal parameters during a 12‐week resistance training program in untrained healthy young men.

Material and Methods

We randomized 18 healthy young men to a standard diet (ST group) or an isocaloric high protein diet (HP group). Both groups participated in a 12‐week resistance exercise program. We measured body composition, lipid profile, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR) indices, total ghrelin, and exercise‐related hormones at baseline and 12 weeks.

Results

In the HP group, lean body mass (LBM), total ghrelin, growth hormone, testosterone and cortisol levels showed an increase, whereas body fat percentage and HOMA‐IR showed a decrease at 12 weeks, compared with baseline (P ≤ 0.05). In the ST group, no changes in these parameters were observed during the 12‐week period. During the 12‐week period, significant differences in the pattern of change of LBM (P = 0.032), total ghrelin (P = 0.037), HOMA‐IR (P = 0.040) and high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (P = 0.011) over time were observed between the groups.

Conclusions

The findings of the present study suggest that an isocaloric high‐protein diet can ameliorate body composition, metabolic profiles and energy metabolism during a 12‐week scheduled resistance training program in untrained healthy young men. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (no. NCT01714700).     

Diabetes mellitus,but not small dense low‐density lipoprotein,is predictive of cardiovascular disease: A Korean community‐based prospective cohort study

Aims/Introduction

Small dense low‐density lipoprotein (sdLDL) has been suggested to be a potential risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD).

Materials and Methods

We carried out a prospective nested case–control study in the Korean Health and Genome Study. Participants were men and women aged 40–69 years who developed CVD (n = 313), and were matched by age and sex to controls who remained free of CVD (n = 313) during the 8‐years follow‐up period (from 2001 to 2009). LDL subfractions were analyzed in frozen samples collected from the 626 participants using polyacrylamide tube gel electrophoresis.

Results

Patients with CVD had a significantly higher glycated hemoglobin level compared with the controls (5.72 vs 5.56). The proportion of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) was higher in those who developed CVD during follow up (8.0% vs 1.9%). The frequency of CVD according to each tertile of LDL particle size and the number of metabolic syndrome components did not differ significantly. In the multivariate analysis, DM (odds ratio 4.244, 95% confidence interval 1.693–10.640, P = 0.002) was the only independent predictive factor of CVD. LDL particle size was not associated with the risk for future CVD.

Conclusions

Small dense LDL might not be a significant predictor of CVD in this Korean community‐based prospective cohort study.     

Secretory units of islets in transplantation index is a useful predictor of insulin requirement in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients

Aims/Introduction

The objective of the present study was to clarify the validity of β‐cell function‐related parameters for predicting the insulin requirement of Japanese type 2 diabetic patients.

Materials and Methods

In 188 patients with type 2 diabetes who had been admitted to the University of Toyama Hospital (Toyama, Japan) without receiving insulin therapy, we carried out a cross‐sectional study examining the relationship between the homeostasis model assessment of β‐cell function (HOMA‐β) and C‐peptide‐based indices, and also carried out a retrospective study to examine the utility for predicting insulin requirement of several β ‐cell function‐related indices using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

The secretory units of islets in transplantation index (SUIT) had the strongest correlation with HOMA‐β, followed by the fasting serum C‐peptide immunoreactivity index (CPI); the fasting serum C‐peptide immunoreactivity itself (F‐CPR) had the least correlation. The CPI, HOMA‐β and SUIT were significantly lower in the insulin‐requiring group than in the non‐insulin‐requiring group, even after adjustments for confounding factors (P < 0.01). The areas under the ROC curve for insulin requirement were 0.622, 0.774, 0.808, and 0.759 for F‐CPR, CPI, SUIT, and HOMA‐β, respectively. The cut‐off values of SUIT, CPI, and HOMA‐β for an over 80% specificity for the prediction of insulin therapy were 23.5, 1.00, and 14.9, respectively.

Conclusions

The present study shows that SUIT is the best predictor of insulin requirement among these β‐cell function‐related markers.     

Impact of cigarette smoking on impaired insulin secretion and insulin resistance in Japanese men: The Saku Study

Aims/Introduction

To assess the impact of smoking on impaired insulin secretion and insulin resistance in Japanese men.

Materials and Methods

This study included 1,199 men aged 30–79 years without diabetes, impaired insulin secretion and insulin resistance at baseline who underwent a comprehensive medical check‐up between April 2006 and March 2007 at Saku Central Hospital. Smoking status was categorized as current, ex‐smoker and never‐smoker. Insulinogenic index and homeostasis model assessment‐insulin resistance were determined using a standard 75‐g oral glucose tolerance test. The Japan Diabetes Society criteria were used to define impaired insulin secretion and insulin resistance. Participants were followed up until March 2011.

Results

A total of 449 and 99 men developed impaired insulin secretion and insulin resistance during 3,403 and 4,092 person‐years follow up, respectively. The multivariable‐adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for impaired insulin secretion were 1.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84–1.33) in ex‐smokers and 1.95 (95% CI 1.44–2.63) in current smokers compared with never‐smokers after adjustment for age, familial history of diabetes, alcohol consumption, exercise, systolic blood pressure, triglyceride, γ‐glutamyltransferase, waist circumference, leukocyte count, changes in smoking status and changes in waist circumference. The number of pack‐years was positively associated with the risk for impaired insulin secretion in a dose‐dependent manner (P‐values for trend <0.001). The multivariable‐adjusted HRs for insulin resistance were 0.95 (95% CI 0.56–1.61) in ex‐smokers and 1.11 (95% CI 0.67–1.79) in current smokers compared with never‐smokers.

Conclusions

Cigarette smoking is a modifiable risk factor for impaired insulin secretion. The findings might also be important for other Asian populations, which have low insulin secreting ability.     

Efficacy and safety of exenatide once‐weekly vs exenatide twice‐daily in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Aims/Introduction

To compare safety and efficacy of the extended‐release formulation exenatide once weekly (EQW) vs exenatide twice daily (EBID) for 26 weeks in type 2 diabetes patients from China, India, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan.

Materials and Methods

A randomized, comparator‐controlled, open‐label study included 681 patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled (hemoglobin A1c [HbA_1c] ≥7 and ≤11%) with oral antihyperglycemic medications (OAMs). Patients added 2 mg EQW or 10 μg EBID to current OAMs. Safety was re‐evaluated 10 weeks after last treatment.

Results

EQW was superior to EBID on HbA_1c measures at week 26 (Least‐squares mean treatment difference: −0.31% [95% confidence interval −0.49, −0.14%]). More EQW‐treated patients achieved target HbA_1c ≤7.0% (P = 0.003), ≤6.5% (P < 0.001), or ≤6.0% (P = 0.003). Fasting serum glucose reductions were greater among EQW‐treated patients (P < 0.001). Blood glucose profiles improved in both treatment groups (P < 0.001). Weight loss occurred with both treatments, but was greater with EBID. Adverse events (≥10%, either group) were nausea, injection‐site induration, dyslipidemia and vomiting. Injection‐site induration was more frequent with EQW, whereas nausea, vomiting and hypoglycemia were less frequent. One episode each of major hypoglycemia (EBID) and pancreatitis (EQW) were reported.

Conclusion

In this population, EQW and EBID showed efficacious glucose and weight control; safety and tolerability were consistent with observations in non‐Asian patients. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (no. NCT00917267).     

Comparison of the efficacy of sitagliptin and glimepiride dose‐up in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled by sitagliptin and glimepiride in combination

Aims/Introduction

The goal of the study was to examine the effects of sitagliptin dose‐up or glimepiride dose‐up in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes who were controlled inadequately by sitagliptin and glimepiride in combination.

Materials and Methods

A multicenter, prospective, randomized, open‐label study was carried out in 50 patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sitagliptin and low‐dose glimepiride. The patients were randomly assigned to receive the addition of 50 mg/day sitagliptin or 0.5 mg/day glimepiride. The primary end‐point was the percentage change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c).

Results

During a follow‐up period, the difference in the percentage changes in HbA1c between the two groups was not significant (P = 0.13). However, HbA1c was significantly decreased by glimepiride dose‐up (P < 0.01 vs baseline), but not by sitagliptin dose‐up (P = 0.74). Univariate linear regression analyses showed that the percentage change in HbA1c was significantly associated with the serum level of arachidonic acid (AA) in both groups.

Conclusions

There was no significant difference in the HbA1c‐lowering effects between the two groups. However, a significant HbA1c‐lowering effect from baseline of glimepiride dose‐up was found, and the AA level showed a negative correlation with the decrease in HbA1c in the sitagliptin dose‐up group, but a positive correlation in the glimepiride dose‐up group. These findings suggest that the AA level is associated with HbA1c reduction in response to dose‐up with these drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes in a combination therapy with sitagliptin and glimepiride. This trial was registered with UMIN (no. 000009544).     

Tolerability,effectiveness and predictive parameters for the therapeutic usefulness of exenatide in obese,Korean patients with type 2 diabetes

Aims/Introduction

We assessed the tolerability, effectiveness and predictive parameters for the therapeutic usefulness of exenatide in obese Korean participants with type 2 diabetes. We also evaluated the characteristics of participants who respond adequately to glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) analog therapy in terms of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level reductions and weight loss.

Materials and Methods

This prospective, observational, single‐arm (exenatide b.i.d. in combination with both metformin and sulphonylurea), open‐label study of GLP‐1 analog treatment with close monitoring of metabolic parameters and weight changes was carried out for up to 22 weeks.

Results

Of the 110 enrolled obese participants, 37 participants dropped out during the 22‐week treatment period. A total of 73 participants completed the study (median age 55.0 years, interquartile range 44.0–65.0). The median duration of diabetes was 8.0 years (interquartile range 3.5–12.5) with a mean HbA1c value of 7.6% (interquartile range 7.00–8.55). The median body mass index was 30.78 kg/m² (interquartile range 27.89–33.92). After 22 weeks, median changes from baseline for HbA1c levels and weight were −0.7% and −3.0 kg, respectively, which were significant. No severe hypoglycemic events were observed. Multivariate regression analysis showed that C‐peptide values were a significant independent predictor for a reduction in HbA1c levels (β = 0.865, P = 0.018) with exenatide BID in combination with both sulphonylurea and metformin in obese Korean participants with type 2 diabetes and insulin naïveté.

Conclusions

Clinical and laboratory parameters, such as insulin naïveté and preserved β‐cell function, should be taken into consideration as important factors in the choice of GLP‐1 analog when predicting GLP‐1 analog responsiveness. This trial was registered with the local committee at Yonsei University in Korea (4‐2011‐0032).