Systematic correlation of continuous-wave Doppler and hemodynamic measurements in patients with aortic stenosis

The purpose of this study was to compare estimates of pressure gradients obtained from continuous-wave (CW) Doppler recordings with direct pressure measurements derived from cardiac catheterization in patients with aortic stenosis. Forty patients who underwent cardiac catheterization for evaluation of aortic stenosis were prospectively studied with CW Doppler spectral recordings of the aortic valve prior to catheterization. Thirty-three patients underwent a second Doppler examination simultaneously with pressure recordings in the catheterization laboratory. Nineteen of the patients had catheterization pressures measured using high-fidelity, micromanometer-tip catheters. Doppler and pressure tracings were digitized using a microprocessor-based computer with a software program which allowed for calculation of maximal instantaneous, mean, and peak-to-peak gradients, plus ejection and acceleration times. Maximal instantaneous gradient by CW Doppler showed an excellent correlation with maximal instantaneous catheterization gradient (r = 0.93, SEE = 9 mm Hg). The correlation of maximal instantaneous Doppler gradient with peak-to-peak catheterization gradient was also linear (r = 0.85, SEE = 12 mm Hg), but there was a consistent overestimation of peak-to-peak gradient in 38 of 40 cases (mean = 17 mm Hg). Mean gradient as calculated by the two techniques correlated best of all measurements performed (r = 0.95, SEE = 6 mm Hg). When patients were grouped into subsets of mild (0 to 25 mm Hg), moderate (25 to 50 mm Hg), and severe (greater than 50 mm Hg) levels of stenosis, the correlation of maximal instantaneous Doppler and peak-to-peak catheterization gradients were r = 0.22, 0.44, and 0.77, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Echocardiographic assessment for surgical treatment in patients with aortic stenosis]

The diagnostic value of preoperative echocardiography was assessed in 51 patients with aortic stenosis. We measured 1) left ventricular-aortic pressure gradient (LV-Ao PG), 2) aortic valve area (AVA), 3) grade of LV hypertrophy and function, and 4) aortic annulus diameter for determining the availability and size of a prosthesis. The maximal instantaneous PG (max-PG) by continuous-wave (cw) Doppler echocardiography correlated well with the peak-to-peak PG by cardiac catheterization (cath), and their correlation equation was y = 1.49 x -48.3 with a correlation coefficient of 0.90. Excellent correlations were also found between cw-max PG and cath-max PG (r = 0.84), and between cw-mean systolic PG and cath-mean systolic PG (r = 0.80). The AVA of the echocardiogram, which was derived from the stroke volume using Gibson's M-mode echocardiographic formula and the cw-Doppler echocardiographic mean gradient, correlated well with the AVA of the cardiac catheterization using Gorlin's formula (y = 1.33 x -0.61, r = 0.79). Preoperative LV pump function, which was obtained from the M-mode echocardiogram, correlated inversely with end-systolic wall stress, and a depressed LV pump function was observed in patients with inadequate hypertrophy. In such patients, however, depressed function was alleviated after surgical treatment. Thus, we considered that cardiac catheterization for further examination is unnecessary, even in such patients. To determine the available size of the prosthesis, measurement of the inner diameter of the aortic annulus on the long-axis cross-sections was the most useful.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Noninvasive determination of the valvar area in aortic valve disease by Doppler echocardiography and radionuclide angiography

To assess the severity of outlfow obstruction in patients with aortic valve disease, the aortic valvar area was noninvasively determined in 22 patients with isolated aortic stenosis or combined stenosis and regurgitation. The ejection time (ET), maximal velocity (Vmax), and systolic velocity integral (SVI) of the aortic flow was obtained by continuous wave Doppler ultrasound. Left ventricular stroke volume (SV) was determined by radionuclide angiography, using a counts-based nongeometric technique with individual attenuation correction. Aortic valve area (AVA) was calculated using a modified Gorlin formula; AVA = SV/(71.2 X ET X Vmax), and also by dividing the stroke volume by the systolic velocity integral; AVA = SV/SVI. The two noninvasive determinations correlated closely with the valve areas obtained by invasive measurements; r = 0.95, SEE = +/- 0.13 cm2 by the modified Gorlin formula, and r = 0.94, SEE = +/- 0.14 cm2 by the integration method. The two noninvasive calculations showed almost uniform results; r = 0.98, SEE = +/- 0.09 cm2. In conclusion, aortic valve area can be determined with reasonable accuracy by combining Doppler echocardiography and radionuclide angiography. This noninvasive approach may reduce the need for invasive measurements in patients with suspected aortic valve disease. In addition, radionuclide angiography provides important information about left ventricular function.     

Noninvasive evaluation of aortic stenosis severity utilizing Doppler ultrasound and electrical bioimpedance

Aortic valve area was calculated noninvasively in 30 patients with aortic stenosis undergoing cardiac catheterization. Continuous wave Doppler ultrasound was employed to estimate the mean transvalvular pressure gradient. The mean left ventricular outflow tract flow velocity and cross-sectional area were determined from pulsed Doppler and two-dimensional ultrasound recordings. Electrical transthoracic bioimpedance cardiography performed simultaneously with the ultrasonic study and repeated at the time of catheterization measured heart rate, systolic ejection period and cardiac output. These noninvasive data permitted calculation of aortic valve area using the Gorlin equation (range 0.21 to 1.75 cm2) and the continuity equation (range 0.25 to 1.9 cm2). Subsequent cardiac catheterization showed valve area to range from 0.21 to 1.75 cm2. The mean Doppler pressure gradient estimate was highly predictive of the gradient measured at catheterization (r = +0.92, SEE = 10). Bioimpedance cardiac output measurements agreed with the average of Fick and indicator dye estimates (r = +0.90, SEE = 0.52). Valve area estimates utilizing continuous wave Doppler ultrasound and electrical bioimpedance were superior (r = +0.91, SEE = 0.12) to estimates obtained utilizing the continuity equation (r = +0.76, SEE = 0.29) and were more reliable in the detection of patients with severe aortic stenosis (9 of 11 versus 6 of 11). These data show that 1) electrical bioimpedance methods accurately estimate cardiac output in the presence of aortic stenosis; 2) the hybridized bioimpedance-Doppler ultrasound method yields accurate estimates of aortic stenosis area; and 3) the speed, accuracy and cost-effectiveness of aortic stenosis evaluation may be improved by this hybridized approach.     

A practical application of Doppler echocardiography for the assessment of severity of aortic stenosis

This study evaluated a strategy that makes optimal use of Doppler echocardiography for estimating the severity of valvular aortic stenosis (AS). Fifty-eight patients with no more than moderate aortic insufficiency who underwent cardiac catheterization were evaluated with two-dimensional echocardiography and Doppler velocimetry to determine the peak velocity across the stenotic valve and aortic valve area (AVA) by means of the continuity equation. All 33 peak Doppler velocities of greater than or equal to 4 m/sec had critical AS (AVA less than or equal to 0.8 cm2 at catheterization). Conversely, six of seven patients with Doppler velocities of less than or equal to 3 m/sec had noncritical AS. The patient with a falsely low peak velocity had severely depressed left ventricular function. Doppler velocity alone was inadequate in determining severity of AS for patients with velocities between 3 and 4 m/sec. The continuity equation proved accurate in estimating AVA in the 46 patients for whom catheterization and ultrasound data were sufficient to compare calculated AVA (r = 0.81), and was also accurate for those patients with peak Doppler velocities between 3 and 4 m/sec (r = 0.90). These results suggest that Doppler velocimetry alone is adequate in determining critical vs noncritical AS in many patients, while the continuity equation should be applied for patients with peak velocities between 3 and 4 m/sec as well as in patients with severely depressed cardiac function.     

Accurate assessment of aortic stenosis severity by Doppler echocardiography independent of aortic jet velocity

The present investigation was designed to derive an accurate pulsed Doppler method of assessing aortic stenosis severity that does not rely on measurement of aortic jet velocity. Left ventricular ET and SV were determined from pulsed Doppler recordings of flow velocity at the aortic anulus in 44 mostly normotensive patients with aortic stenosis. Aortic valve area at catheterization ranged between 0.3 and 2.13 cm2. A predicted ET was derived from Doppler-determined SV with the use of a regression equation previously described by Harley et al. A significant inverse quadratic relation was observed between the ET difference (delta ET), defined as measured ET minus predicted ET, and valve area at catheterization (r = -0.87; valve area = 1.4 - 15 delta ET + 60 delta ET2; SEE = 0.23 cm2). An ET difference of greater than or equal to 0.060 second was 88% sensitive, 89% specific, and 89% accurate for detecting critical aortic stenosis. Thus the ET difference, derived from measurements of SV and ET by pulsed Doppler, is a sensitive index for detection of critical aortic stenosis that is independent of determination of aortic jet velocity. This index should complement the Doppler evaluation of aortic stenosis, especially in cases where interrogation of the stenotic jet with continuous wave Doppler is inadequate.     

Two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic determination of aortic valve area in adults with aortic stenosis

To determine if aortic stenosis severity could be accurately measured by two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), 62 adult subjects (mean age 66 +/- 12 years) with aortic stenosis had their aortic valve area (AVA) determined by direct planimetry using TEE, and with the continuity equation using combined transthoracic Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiography (TTE). Eighteen subjects had AVA calculated by the Gorlin method during catheterization. An excellent correlation (r = 0.93, SEE = 0.17 cm2) was found between AVA determined by TEE (mean 1.24 +/- 0.49 cm2; range 0.40 to 2.26 cm2) and TTE (mean 1.23 +/- 0.46 cm2; range 0.40 to 2.23 cm2). The absolute (0.13 +/- 0.12 cm2) and percent (10.8 +/- 8.9%) differences between AVA determined by TEE versus TTE were small. Excellent correlations between AVA by TEE and TTE were also found in subjects with normal systolic function (r = 0.95, SEE = 0.14 cm2; n = 38) and impaired function (r = 0.91, SEE = 0.21 cm2; n = 24). AVA determined by catheterization correlated better with AVA measured by TEE (r = 0.91, SEE = 0.15 cm2) than AVA measured with TTE (r = 0.84, SEE = 0.19 cm2). These data demonstrate that AVA can be accurately measured by direct planimetry using TEE in subjects with aortic stenosis. TEE may become an important adjunct to transthoracic echocardiography in the assessment of aortic stenosis severity.     

Color-guided Doppler echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis

The severity of valvular aortic stenosis was assessed by Doppler color flow mapping in 100 consecutive patients who underwent successful cardiac catheterization within 2 weeks of the Doppler study. The maximal width of the aortic stenosis jet seen in 61 of these patients (Group A) was measured at the aortic valve. Color-guided continuous wave Doppler examination was used to measure the mean transaortic pressure gradient, and the aortic valve area was estimated using the simplified continuity equation. The aortic stenosis jet was not seen in 39 patients (Group B), and the mean pressure gradient and aortic valve area in these patients were assessed by conventional Doppler echocardiography alone. The mean pressure gradient obtained by continuous wave Doppler study and cardiac catheterization in the 61 Group A patients correlated well (r = 0.90); the correlation was lower in the 39 Group B patients (r = 0.70). The overall correlation for the combined Groups A and B was good (r = 0.82). The aortic valve area estimated by continuous wave Doppler study and cardiac catheterization in 54 Group A patients correlated well (r = 0.92); the correlation in 22 Group B patients was lower (r = 0.71). The correlation for all 76 patients (Groups A and B) was good (r = 0.80). The maximal aortic stenosis jet width also correlated well with the aortic valve area estimated at catheterization in 54 patients (r = 0.90). Group C represented an additional 14 patients in whom the left ventricle could not be entered during cardiac catheterization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Non-invasive evaluation with continuous Doppler of the systolic pressure of the right ventricle in patients with tricuspid insufficiency

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is detected by Doppler echocardiography in a high proportion of patients with right ventricle pressure or volume overload. Continuous wave Doppler (CW) provides a noninvasive estimation of the transtricuspid systolic pressure gradient, applying the modified Bernoulli formula to the maximum velocity of the TR jet. The purpose of this study was to test the accuracy of the CW prediction of systolic right ventricular pressure (RVPs), obtained adding a clinical estimate of the mean right atrial pressure (RAPm) to the Doppler derived pressure gradient. The study population consisted of 22 adult patients with Doppler proved TR, undergoing right heart catheterization (cath) for mitral valve disease (12 pts), atrial septal defect (8 pts), dilated cardiomyopathy (1 pt) or pulmonary hypertension (1 pt). Two studies were duplicated after nifedipine administration. TR was graded by pulsed Doppler flow mapping as mild in 7, moderate in 11, severe in 4 pts. RAPm was estimated clinically from the inspection of neck veins pulsatility (mmHg = pulsatility cm+5/1.3). At CATH RVPs ranged from 27 to 80 (46 +/- 17) mmHg, RAPm from 0 to 13 (6 +/- 3) mmHg. RVPs Doppler prediction showed a close correlation with CATH (r .97, SEE 4.2 mmHg), with a slight mean underestimation (-2 +/- 4 mmHg) (Fig. 3, Tab. I). The discrepancies between CW and CATH ranged from -9 to +10 mmHg, almost entirely due to inaccuracy of the RAPm clinical estimate (r .48, see 3.8 mmHg) (Fig. 4, Tab. I).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Noninvasive determination of valve area in adults with aortic stenosis using Doppler echocardiography

Doppler ultrasound has been used to determine the pressure gradient P1-P2 across the valve in patients with aortic stenosis (AS), but since the gradient varies over time and may be deceptively low in patients with impaired cardiac output, the key parameter to obtain is the orifice area (A). By calculating stroke volume (SV) from the modal flow velocity [Vmode(t)] over the systolic ejection period (sep) or diastolic filling period (dfp), wherever laminar flow exists in the heart across an area of known diameter D, (pulmonary artery or atrioventricular valves), and by substituting P1-P2 = 4Vmax2, (Vmax = peak velocity in the aortic jet), the Gorlin formula becomes: (Formula: see text) where theta = flow intercept angle at D. This approach was applied in nine adult patients with AS (age 64 +/- 8 years) in whom recent catheterization data was available for comparison. Close correlation was found between the calculated areas: A(Doppler) = 0.82 A(Cath) + 0.17 (r = 0.94, p less than 0.001). Two patients with Doppler gradients of less than 40 mmHg were shown by this Doppler method nevertheless to have severely narrowed orifice areas of less than or equal to 0.78 cm2. Although there is a tendency to overestimate slightly the valve area, Doppler ultrasound assessment using this technique adds valuable noninvasive information concerning the degree of aortic valve disease.     

Planimetry and Transthoracic Two-Dimensional Echocardiography in Noninvasive Assessment of Aortic Valve Area in Patients With Valvular Aortic Stenosis

Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography in measuring aortic valve area (AVA) by planimetry.Background. Planimetry of AVA using two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic images has been reported to be a reliable method for measuring AVA in patients with aortic stenosis. Recent advances in resolution of two-dimensional echocardiography permit direct visualization of an aortic valve orifice from the transthoracic approach more easily than before.Methods. Forty-two adult patients with valvular aortic stenosis were examined. A parasternal short-axis view of the aortic valve was obtained with transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography. AVA was measured directly by planimetry of the inner leaflet edges at the time of maximal opening in early systole. AVA was also measured by planimetry using transesophageal echocardiography, by the continuity equation and by cardiac catheterization (Gorlin formula).Results. In 32 (76%) of the 42 study patients, AVA could be detected by using the transthoracic planimetry method. There were good correlations between results of transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiographic planimetry and the continuity equation (y = 0.90x + 0.09, r = 0.90, p < 0.001, SEE = 0.09 cm²), transesophageal echocardiographic planimetry (y = 1.05x − 0.02, r = 0.98, p < 0.001, SEE = 0.04 cm²) and the Gorlin formula (y = 1.02x + 0.05, r = 0.89, p < 0.001, SEE = 0.10 cm²).Conclusions. Transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography provides a feasible and reliable method in measuring AVA in patients with aortic stenosis.     

Doppler measurement of transvalvular gradients. Simultaneous Doppler-catheterization recordings on 78 patients

Several studies have demonstrated the value of Doppler ultrasound as a means of measuring gradients across cardiac valves. However, in view of sudden variations in cardiac output gradients should be measured simultaneously by Doppler and catheterization in order to validate the former method and determine its accuracy. We conducted a prospective study with simultaneous recordings in 78 patients with aortic valve stenosis (33) or mitral valve stenosis (19) or cardiac valve prosthesis (26). Mean age of the patients was 55 +/- 14 years, and 50% of them were male. Subjects with pure or predominant regurgitation were excluded from the study. In the whole of the population studied, correlation between Doppler ultrasound and haemodynamics was very good with r = 0.98, p less than 0.001 for maximum gradient and r = 0.96, p less than 0.001 for mean gradient. The perfect simultaneity of the haemodynamic and ultrasonic recordings was confirmed by comparing the duration of gradients measured by the two methods (r = 0.996, p less than 0.001). There also was very close correlation between ultrasounds and catheter in patients with mitral stenosis (maximum gradient r = 0.98, p less than 0.001; mean gradient r = 0.97, p less than 0.001). Mean Doppler-catheter differences were not significant, and no underestimation by Doppler reached or exceeded 5 mmHg. Correlations were also satisfactory in patients with aortic stenosis (maximum gradient r = 0.97, p less than 0.01; mean gradient r = 0.90, p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Assessing the true severity of low-gradient aortic stenosis using resting echocardiography

BackgroundDobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is required to determine whether low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS) with a small aortic valve area (AVA) is truly severe. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of ejection dynamics parameters at resting echocardiography for predicting the result of DSE performed in patients with low-gradient AS.MethodsThe results of resting echocardiography and DSE performed on 51 AS patients with low mean-gradient (<40 mmHg) and small indexed AVA (<0.60 cm²/m²) were retrospectively reviewed. Acceleration time (AT) and the ratio of AT to ejection time (ET) were measured on the recorded images. True-severe AS was defined as that with indexed projected AVA < 0.60 cm²/m².ResultsTwenty-six (51%) patients had true-severe AS, while 22 (43%) patients had preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (≥50%). Baseline indexed AVA and AT/ET were independently associated with indexed projected AVA at DSE. AT/ET was the only independent determinant of valve compliance. Indexed AVA ≤ 0.493 cm²/m² and AT/ET > 0.334 at baseline had sensitivities of 69% and 65% and specificities of 84% and 84%, respectively, for predicting true-severe AS. The presence of either indexed AVA ≤ 0.493 cm²/m² or AT/ET > 0.334 had a higher sensitivity (88%), and their co-occurrence had a higher specificity (100%).ConclusionsIndexed projected AVA at DSE was predicted by AT/ET, which represented valve compliance, along with indexed AVA. The true severity of low-gradient AS can be screened using a combination of resting indexed AVA and AT/ET without performing DSE.     

Accurate noninvasive quantification of stenotic aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography

Laminar flow through a conduit is equal to the mean velocity times the cross-sectional area of the orifice. Therefore, volume is equal to the time-velocity integral multiplied by the cross-sectional area. In aortic stenosis, flow in the stenotic jet is laminar and the aortic valve area should be equal to the volume of blood ejected through the valve divided by the time-velocity integral of the aortic jet velocity recorded by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography. To test whether this concept can be used to accurately determine aortic valve area noninvasively by the Doppler method, 39 patients (age 35 to 82 years, mean 63) underwent pulsed Doppler combined with two-dimensional echocardiography for measurement of stroke volume at the aortic, pulmonic, and mitral anulus as well as continuous-wave Doppler recording of the aortic jet. Aortic valve area determined at cardiac catheterization by the Gorlin equation ranged between 0.4 and 2.07 cm2 (mean 0.89 +/- 0.45). Doppler-derived valve area, determined with the stroke volume value from either the aortic, pulmonic, or mitral anulus, correlated well with the area determined at cardiac catheterization (r = .95, .97, and .96, respectively). A simplified method for measuring aortic valve area derived as the cross-sectional area of the aortic anulus times peak velocity just proximal to the aortic valve divided by peak aortic jet velocity correlated well with measurements obtained at cardiac catheterization (r = .94). An excellent separation between critical and noncritical aortic stenosis was seen using either one of the Doppler methods.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: how does it compare to current diagnostic standards?

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether magnetic resonance (MR) planimetry of the aortic valve area (AVA) may prove to be a reliable, non-invasive diagnostic tool in the assessment of aortic valve stenosis, and how the results compare with current diagnostic standards.BACKGROUND: Current standard techniques for assessing the severity of aortic stenosis include transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as well as transvalvular pressure measurements during cardiac catheterization. METHODS: Forty consecutive patients underwent cardiac catheterization, TEE, and MR. The AVA was estimated by direct planimetry (MR, TEE) or calculated indirectly via the peak systolic transvalvular gradient (catheter). Pressure gradients from cardiac catheterization and Doppler echocardiography were also compared. RESULTS: By MR, the mean AVA(max) was 0.91 +/- 0.25 cm(2); by TEE, AVA(max) was 0.89 +/- 0.28 cm(2); and by catheter, the AVA was calculated as 0.64 +/- 0.26 cm(2). Mean absolute differences in AVA were 0.02 cm(2) for MR versus TEE, 0.27 cm(2) for MR versus catheter, and 0.25 cm(2) for TEE versus catheter. Correlations for AVA(max) were r = 0.96 between MR and TEE, r = 0.47 between TEE and catheter, and r = 0.44 between MR and catheter. The correlation between Doppler and catheter gradients was r = 0.71. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance planimetry of the AVA correlates well with TEE and less well with the catheter-derived AVA. Invasive and Doppler pressure correlated less well than those obtained from planimetric techniques. Magnetic resonance planimetry of the AVA may provide an accurate, non-invasive, well-tolerated alternative to invasive techniques and transthoracic echocardiography in the assessment of aortic stenosis.     

Diagnostic accuracy of continuous wave Doppler echocardiography in severe aortic stenosis in the elderly

Forty-four male patients (mean age 63.6 years) with aortic stenosis (AS) were evaluated by conventional hemodynamic methods and continuous wave (CW) Doppler echocardiography. The relationship between Doppler mean gradients and direct mean pressure gradients in all patients was significant, with an r value of 0.88. Sixteen of 17 patients with a mean Doppler gradient greater than or equal to 40 mmHg had severe AS (AVA less than or equal to 1.0 cm2). Twenty-seven patients had a Doppler gradient less than 40 mmHg, and 8 of these patients had severe AS (AVA less than or equal to 1.0 cm2). The sensitivity and specificity of a Doppler gradient greater than or equal to 40 mmHg in detecting severe AS were, therefore, 67% and 95%, respectively. Thirty-three percent (8/24) of patients with severe AS and low Doppler gradients (less than 40 mmHg) had evidence of poor left ventricular function, evidenced by a lower cardiac output, a higher heart rate and an abnormal PEP/LVET ratio compared to the other patients. Thus, the presence of a low stroke volume less than or equal to 60 ml/beat and PEP/LVET x HR greater than 26 is of value in identifying patients where the Doppler is likely to significantly underestimate the degree of aortic stenosis.     

Determination of the stenotic aortic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography

The severity of aortic stenosis was evaluated by Doppler echocardiography in 48 adults (mean age 67 years) undergoing cardiac catheterization. Maximal Doppler systolic gradient correlated with peak to peak pressure gradient (r = 0.79, y = 0.63x + 25.2 mm Hg) and mean Doppler gradient correlated with mean pressure gradient (r = 0.77, y = 0.59x + 10.0 mm Hg) by manometry. The transvalvular pressure gradient is flow dependent, however, and associated left ventricular dysfunction was common in our patients (33%). Thus, of the 32 patients with an aortic valve area less than or equal to 1.0 cm2 at catheterization, 6 (19%) had a peak Doppler gradient less than 50 mm Hg. To take into account the influence of volume flow, aortic valve area was calculated as stroke volume, measured simultaneously by thermodilution, divided by the Doppler systolic velocity integral in the aortic jet. Aortic valve areas calculated by this method were compared with results at catheterization in the total group (r = 0.71). Significant aortic insufficiency was present in 71% of the population. In the subgroup without significant coexisting aortic insufficiency, closer agreement of valve area with catheterization was noted (n = 14, r = 0.91, y = 0.83x + 0.24 cm2). Transaortic stroke volume can be determined noninvasively by Doppler echocardiographic measures in the left ventricular outflow tract, just proximal to the stenotic valve. Aortic valve area can then be calculated as left ventricular outflow tract cross-sectional area times the systolic velocity integral of outflow tract flow, divided by the systolic velocity integral in the aortic jet.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Value and limitations of Doppler echocardiography in the quantification of stenotic mitral valve area: comparison of the pressure half-time and the continuity equation methods

Two Doppler methods, the pressure half-time method proposed by Hatle and the method based on the equation of continuity, were used to estimate stenotic mitral valve area noninvasively, and the accuracy of these methods was examined in patients with and without associated aortic regurgitation. Mitral valve area determined at catheterization by the Gorlin formula was used as a standard of reference. The study population consisted of 41 patients with mitral stenosis, and 20 of the 41 patients had associated aortic regurgitation. According to the equation of continuity, mitral valve area was determined as a product of aortic or pulmonic annular cross-sectional area and the ratio of time velocity integral of aortic or pulmonic flow to that of the mitral stenotic jet. Mitral valve area was determined by the pressure half-time method as 220/pressure half-time, the time from the peak transmitral velocity to one-half the square root of the peak velocity on the continuous-wave Doppler-determined transmitral flow velocity pattern. The pressure half-time method tended to overestimate catheterization measurements, and the correlation coefficient for this relation was .69 (SEE = 0.44 cm2). The correlation coefficient improved to .90 when the patients with associated aortic regurgitation were excluded. Mitral valve areas determined by the continuity equation method correlated well with catheterization measurements at a correlation coefficient of .91 (SEE = 0.24 cm2), irrespective of the presence of aortic regurgitation. The ratio of the time-velocity integral or aortic or pulmonic flow to the time-velocity integral of mitral stenotic jet also correlated well with mitral valve area determined by catheterization at a correlation coefficient of .84 (SEE = 0.10).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Usefulness of noninvasive assessment of aortic stenosis before and after percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty

Noninvasive and catheterization studies were performed in 40 patients (mean age 76 +/- 12 years) before and after percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty. Measurements included time to 1/2 carotid upstroke, left ventricular ejection time, aortic valve excursion, mean aortic valve gradient and aortic valve area assessed using the continuity equation: aortic valve area = A X V/V1, where A = left ventricular outflow tract area, V = maximal left ventricular outflow tract velocity assessed by pulsed Doppler echocardiography and V1 = peak velocity in the aortic stenotic jet assessed using continuous-wave echocardiography. In addition, mitral regurgitation was assessed by pulsed Doppler mapping techniques. Mean aortic valve gradient, cardiac output and aortic valve area, calculated using the Gorlin formula, were determined at cardiac catheterization. There were significant correlations between Doppler and catheterization measurements of aortic valve area both before (r = 0.71, p less than 0.001) and after (r = 0.85, p less than 0.0001) valvuloplasty. The relations were demonstrated to be linear by F test and met criteria for identity. There were significant increases (all p less than 0.0005) after valvuloplasty in catheterization valve area (0.60 +/- 0.21 to 0.95 +/- 0.39 cm2), Doppler valve area (0.64 +/- 0.22 to 0.91 +/- 0.37 cm2), valve excursion (0.5 +/- 0.3 to 0.8 +/- 0.3 cm) and cardiac output (4.5 +/- 1.6 to 4.9 +/- 1.7 liter/min).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Doppler echocardiography in adults with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Diagnostic utility and cost-effectiveness

To evaluate the diagnostic utility and cost-effectiveness of Doppler echocardiography in adults with symptomatic aortic stenosis, we performed a prospective study in which the need for aortic valve replacement (AVR) was the outcome event. The total sample consisted of 103 adults (mean age, 69 years) undergoing cardiac catheterization for suspected aortic stenosis. Twenty-six patients (25%) were used as a training set to develop a clinical prediction rule. (1) If maximum aortic jet velocity (Vmax) was more than 4.0 m/s, AVR was recommended. (2) If Vmax was less than 3.0 m/s, AVR was not needed. (3) If Vmax was 3.0 to 4.0 m/s and (a) Doppler aortic valve area (AVA) was 1.0 cm2 or less, AVR was recommended, while (b) if Doppler AVA was 1.7 cm2 or greater, AVR was not needed, and (c) if Doppler AVA was 1.1 to 1.6 cm2, consideration of the degree of coexisting aortic insufficiency was necessary. When this rule was applied to the test set (n = 77), the sensitivity was 98%, with a specificity of 89% and a total error rate of 3.9%. The approach could have resulted in cost savings between 24% and 34% compared with an invasive diagnostic approach.