Nasal beclomethasone prevents the seasonal increase in bronchial responsiveness in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma.

Experimental studies have demonstrated that induction of a nasal allergic reaction can lead to an increase in bronchial responsiveness (BR). To assess the clinical relevance of these experimental changes to chronic asthma, we sought to determine the effect of nasal beclomethasone dipropionate (Bdp) on BR in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma. Eighteen subjects with histories of seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma during the fall pollen season with positive skin tests to short ragweed and bronchial hyperresponsiveness to inhaled methacholine were assigned to receive either nasal Bdp (336 micrograms/day) or placebo for the entire ragweed season. Patients recorded daily nasal and chest symptoms, nasal blockage index, oral peak expiratory flow rates, and supplemental medication use. BR to methacholine was measured during the baseline period and 6 weeks into the ragweed season. Although the Bdp group did have a significant improvement in nasal blockage index, there was no improvement in daily asthma symptom scores, oral peak expiratory flow, or asthma medication use. However, subjects treated with Bdp were protected from the increase in BR seen in the placebo group (geometric mean PC20 placebo group: baseline = 0.70, week 6 = 0.29; Bdp group: baseline = 0.80, week 6 = 0.93; intergroup difference, p = 0.022). We conclude that nasal corticosteroid therapy can prevent the increase in BR associated with seasonal pollen exposure in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma.     

Suppression of seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms with daily hydroxyzine.

The effectiveness of hydroxyzine in the suppression of allergic rhinitis symptoms was evaluated using a double-blind, parallel study design during the 1977 ragweed season. Forty-three subjects with positive ragweed skin tests and a history of an exacerbation of symptoms during August and September of the previous two years were randomly assigned to receive either hydroxyzine or placebo. Subjects scored the severity and duration of symptoms in a daily diary and adverse effects were evaluated from a structured interview at two-week intervals. Although drowsiness and dry mouth were frequent initially among the hydroxyzine-treated patients, these minor side effects rapidly disappeared as the dose was slowly increased, and all but one subject tolerated 150 mg/day. Subsequently, during the period of the highest ragweek pollen counts, the hydroxyzine-treated group spent significantly more days free of symptoms or with only mild sneezing, rhinorrhea, and eye symptoms than subjects who took placebo (p less than 0.05). Thus, hydroxyzine appeared to be well tolerated on a continuous daily basis and was effective in suppressing most of the symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Comparison of hydroxyzine with antihistamines more traditionally used for allergic rhinitis appears warranted.     

Local intranasal immunotherapy for ragweed allergic rhinitis I. Clinical response

Local nasal immunotherapy (LNIT) of ragweed allergic rhinitis was studied in a double-blind controlled trial. Sixty-seven subjects were divided into three groups. Twenty-one received unmodified ragweed extract (RW), 24 received a glutaraldehyde polymer of ragweed extract (PRW), and 22 received placebo. Mean symptom/medication scores during the season were 2.12, 2.76, and 3.93 for the RW, PRW, and placebo groups, respectively. Both the RW- and the PRW-treated group scores were significantly lower than those of the placebo group (p < 0.01, and p < 0.025, respectively). The results of the patients' self-evaluations indicated that therapy was effective in 71%, 59%, and 41 %for the RW-, PRW-, and placebo-treated groups, respectively. Adverse reactions to treatment were limited to the upper respiratory tract and were noted by all patients. They were significantly more severe in the RW-treated patients than those in the PRW- or placebo-treated groups. We conclude that LNIT is an effective therapy for ragweed allergic rhinitis. The use of a PRW decreased adverse reactions significantly while slightly decreasing the therapeutic benefit.     

Sodium cromoglycate in ragweed-allergic conjunctivitis

Sodium cromoglycate (SCG), in a 4% solution instilled into each eye 4 times daily, was compared with placebo in a double-blind, noncrossover trial in 30 matched patients with troublesome ragweed pollen-induced conjunctivitis. In the SCG group, eye symptom scores were significantly less (p = 0.05), and all patients judged that their symptoms were improved over the previous year (p less than 0.05). Less antihistamine was used by the SCG group but the difference was not significant. It was concluded that SCG was effective in the treatment of ragweed-induced seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.     

Treatment of ragweed hay fever with intranasally administered disodium cromoglycate*

In a double-blind study the therapeutic effect of a 4% disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) nasal solution was evaluated in thirty-nine patients with acute symptoms of ragweed hay fever. Patients were randomly assigned to the DSCG or placebo group as they presented with allergic rhinitis. Overall, the DSCG was not more effective than placebo in controlling the symptoms of rhinitis or in decreasing the need for concomitant antihistamines or corticosteroids. Among patients with the highest pretreatment serum ragweed-specific IgE (RW IgE) levels, drug-treated patients had some reduction in symptoms as compared to their placebo controls during the peak of the ragweed pollen season. DSCG treatment did not influence the usual seasonal rise in RW IgE. Side effects from both the active and placebo aerosols were frequent but mild. We conclude that DSCG nasal solution used for the treatment of seasonal ragweed allergic rhinitis is relatively ineffective.     

Grass pollen immunotherapy for seasonal rhinitis and asthma: a randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Grass pollen immunotherapy significantly reduces hay fever symptoms and medication requirements. Effects on seasonal asthma are less clear, and concerns over safety persist. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess the effects of grass pollen immunotherapy on symptoms, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and quality of life in seasonal rhinitis and asthma. METHODS: Forty-four patients with severe summer hay fever (of whom 36 reported seasonal chest symptoms and 28 had seasonal bronchial hyperresponsiveness) participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. After symptom monitoring for one summer, participants received injections of a depot grass pollen vaccine (n = 22) or matched placebo injections (n = 22) in a rapid updosing cluster regimen for 4 weeks, followed by monthly injections for 2 years. Outcome measures included hay fever symptoms and medication use, health-related quality of life, and measurements of nonspecific bronchial responsiveness. RESULTS: Significant reductions were observed in the immunotherapy group compared with the placebo group in hay fever symptoms (49%, 15%; P =.01), medication scores (80%, 18%; P =.007), and seasonal chest symptoms (90%, 11%; P <.05). Impairment of overall quality of life (mean score of 7 domains) during the pollen season was less in the immunotherapy group than in the placebo group (median difference [95% CI], 0.8 [0.18-1.5]; P =.02). During the pollen season there was no change in airway methacholine PC(20) (provocation concentration producing a 20% fall in FEV(1)) in the immunotherapy-treated group (P =.5), compared with an almost 3 doubling-dose decrease in the placebo-treated group (P =.01, between-group difference). There were no significant local or systemic side effects during the study. CONCLUSION: Grass pollen immunotherapy improves quality of life in seasonal allergic rhinitis and reduces seasonal asthma symptoms and bronchial hyperresponsiveness.     

Ketotifen in pollen-induced asthma: a double blind placebo-controlled study

Twenty-nine children with an average age of 10.5 years were studied with respect to the protective effect of ketotifen on pollen-induced bronchial asthma. All of them were sensitive to deciduous tree pollen, the diagnosis being verified by bronchial challenge. The children were stratified in matched pairs and randomly allocated to two treatment groups, placebo or ketotifen 1 mg twice daily. The study was double-blind and was performed during the whole of the deciduous tree pollen season. Daily pollen counts were made, allergic symptoms were noted, additional medication was given and the expiratory pulmonary flow was recorded. During the birch pollen peak the ketotifen group showed significantly fewer, and less severe asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis than the placebo group. The anti-asthmatic medication was also used significantly less than in the placebo group. Ketotifen appeared to have good protective properties in the treatment of pollen-induced asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis.     

Disodium cromoglycate in ragweed-allergic rhinitis.

This study was designed to test the effectiveness of disodium cromoglycate when compared to placebo in a double-blind study in patients with ragweed allergic rhinitis. Patients were selected on the basis of a clinical history and a 4+ reaction to the intradermal injection of water-soluble ragweed, 0.02 c.c. of 500 PNU/c.c. Active agent/placebo groups were selected at random and were on the drug for approximately 8 wk, commencing 1 wk prior to the onset of the ragweed pollen season. Patient response was evaluated using patient diary cards, number of antihistamine tablets taken, and patient interviews. In the Toronto study, of 17 patients on the active drug, 15 were graded as improved, compared to only 6 of 21 placebo-treated patients who were improved. However, in the Hamilton study, results were less impressive. Nonetheless, it appears that intranasal insufflation of disodium cromoglycate was more effective in reducing ragweed hay fever symptoms than placebo.     

Efficacy comparison of levocetirizine vs montelukast in ragweed sensitized patients

BACKGROUND: To date, no adequate data are available on direct comparison of the efficacy of levocetirizine, a recently approved histamine1-antihistamine, with that of a leukotriene antagonist in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of therapeutic doses of 5 mg of levocetirizine and 10 mg of montelukast in ragweed sensitized patients. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted between July and October 2006. Symptomatic patients with SAR were exposed to ragweed pollen under controlled conditions in an environmental exposure chamber for 4 to 5 hours after treatment with 5 mg of levocetirizine, 10 mg of montelukast, or matched placebo on 2 consecutive days. The mean change from baseline in pollen-induced rhinitis symptoms, expressed as a major symptoms complex (MSC) score (sum of scores for rhinorrhea, itchy nose, sniffles, nose blows, sneezes, and watery eyes), in period 1 (first 5 hours after first drug intake) was the primary efficacy outcome. RESULTS: A total of 611 patients were screened, of whom 403 were randomized to receive treatment (102 placebo, 152 levocetirizine, and 149 montelukast). The MSC score in period 1 was progressively decreased to a significantly greater extent in the levocetirizine group compared with the montelukast and placebo groups (adjusted mean differences, -2.18 [95% confidence interval, -3.35 to -1.01; P < .001] and -2.22 [95% confidence interval, -3.51 to -0.92; P < .001] for levocetirizine vs montelukast and vs placebo, respectively). The effect of 10 mg of montelukast was not significantly different compared with placebo. Levocetirizine also achieved a significantly faster onset of action within 2.5 hours of administration. Both products were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: This study in an environmental exposure chamber confirms the therapeutic efficacy of 5 mg of levocetirizine in improving symptoms of SAR, which was superior to 10 mg of montelukast.     

Pharmacologic prophylaxis of allergic rhinitis: Relative efficacy of hydroxyzine and chlorpheniramine

The efficacy of hydroxyzine and chlorpheniramine in preventing exacerbations of ragweed allergic rhinitis was compared in a double-blind, randomized manner. Ninety-five subjects with positive skin tests, a history of two previous symptomatic seasons, and discontinuation of immunotherapy for at least 1 yr received either hydroxyzine 150 mg/day, chlorpheniramine 24 mg/day, or placebo during the 1978 ragweed season. Subjects in the placebo group experienced annoying or disabling sneezing 50% of days during the period of highest pollen counts whereas those in the chlorpheniramine and hydroxyzine groups experienced this symptom with equal severity only 22% and 12% of days, respectively. Suppression of rhinorrhea and itchy nose was similar although less dramatic. Both antihistamines were more effective than placebo in altering conjunctivitis, but neither decreased the frequency or severity of nasal stuffiness. Skin tests to ragweed decreased in diameter during the season by 38%, 13%, and 3% among patients receiving hydroxyzine, chlorpheniramine, and placebo, respectively. Frequent drowsiness occurred initially in subjects taking both antihistamines but did not persist. Thus, prophylactic antihistamine therapy effectively prevents most symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis without persistent drowsiness. These data further suggest a therapeutic advantage for hydroxyzine over chlorpheniramine in the doses used.     

A comparison of the effect of diphenhydramine and desloratadine on vigilance and cognitive function during treatment of ragweed-induced allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Decrements in cognitive performance are associated with the use of sedating antihistamines. Most, but not all, second-generation antihistamines have been found to be nonsedating. OBJECTIVE: To examine the central nervous system (CNS) profile of a new second-generation antihistamine, desloratadine. METHODS: Subjects with ragweed-induced allergic rhinitis (aged 18-60 years) who demonstrated a predetermined severity of symptoms after priming with ragweed pollen in the Environmental Exposure Unit were randomized to receive a single dose of desloratadine, 5 mg; diphenhydramine, 50 mg; or placebo. A comprehensive battery of repeatable, automated neuropsychological tests was administered to subjects before treatment (symptomatic baseline) and 90 minutes after taking study medication. RESULTS: Both desloratadine (P = .04) and diphenhydramine (P < .01) alleviated the symptoms of allergic rhinitis compared with placebo, but treatment with diphenhydramine was associated with clinically meaningful decrements on all vigilance parameters (P < .05 for desloratadine-diphenhydramine contrasts). Also, subjects treated with diphenhydramine performed significantly worse than subjects given desloratadine or placebo across all cognitive domains evaluated. Most effect sizes for the mean desloratadine and diphenhydramine differences were between 0.4 and 0.8 (moderate to high). Stanford Sleepiness Scale scores also indicated significantly more somnolence with diphenhydramine vs desloratadine or placebo (P < .001). There were no significant differences on any of the cognitive parameters between subjects treated with desloratadine and those given placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Desloratadine improved ragweed-induced allergic rhinitis symptoms without adversely affecting performance. Diphenhydramine improved allergic rhinitis symptoms but caused significant decrements in vigilance and cognitive functioning. Thus, efficacy of antihistamine treatment must be balanced against the associated effects on CNS functioning.     

Comparison of the efficacy and side effects of aqueous steroid nasal spray (budesonide) and allergen-injection therapy (Pollinex-R) in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis

The efficacy and side effects of two approaches to the treatment of ragweed pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis were compared in a double-blind, parallel-group trial. Sixty ragweed-sensitive adults were randomized either to a course of four Pollinex-R hyposensitization injections during the 6 weeks before the ragweed-pollen season, or to budesonide aqueous nasal steroid spray, 400 micrograms daily, throughout the season. A double-dummy technique was used to achieve blinding. During the ragweed-pollen season, troublesome nasal symptoms were treated with terfenadine, 60 mg, when treatment was needed, up to 240 mg daily, and eye symptoms were treated with naphazoline eye drops, when treatment was needed, up to four times daily. Every day, subjects recorded the severity of nasal and eye symptoms and medication use in a diary. Fourteen of the subjects receiving Pollinex-R were unable to complete the course of injections because of systemic or large local reactions. Eight subjects withdrew during the pollen season because of severe rhinitis; all subjects had received Pollinex-R. Subjects in the budesonide-treated group had minimal nasal symptoms and used very little terfenadine, compared with subjects in the Pollinex-R-treated group (p less than 0.0001). Eye symptoms and eye drop use were similar in the two treatment groups. No clinically important side effects were reported by the subjects receiving budesonide. The results of this study suggest that aqueous budesonide nasal spray is markedly more effective than Pollinex-R in controlling symptoms of seasonal rhinitis while the side effects and inconvenience of immunotherapy are avoided.     

Efficacy and safety of specific immunotherapy with SQ allergen extract in treatment-resistant seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis

BACKGROUND: Specific immunotherapy is widely used to treat allergic rhinitis, but few large-scale clinical trials have been performed. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of specific immunotherapy with 2 doses of Alutard grass pollen in patients with moderately severe seasonal allergic rhinitis inadequately controlled with standard drug therapy. METHODS: We performed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of 410 subjects (203 randomized to 100,000 standardized quality units [SQ-U] maintenance, 104 to 10,000 SQ-U, and 103 to placebo). Three hundred forty-seven (85%) completed treatment. Groups were well matched for demographics and symptoms. RESULTS: Across the whole pollen season, mean symptom and medication scores were 29% and 32% lower, respectively, in the 100,000-SQ-U group compared with those in the placebo group (both P < .001). Over the peak pollen season, mean symptom and medication scores were 32% and 41% lower, respectively, than those in the placebo group. The 10,000-SQ-U group had 22% less symptoms than the placebo group over the whole season (P < .01), but medication scores reduced by only 16% (P = .16). Quality-of-life measures confirmed the superiority of both doses to placebo. Local and delayed side effects were common but generally mild. Clinically significant early and delayed systemic side effects were confined to the 100,000-SQ-U group, but no life-threatening reactions occurred. CONCLUSIONS: One season of immunotherapy with Alutard grass pollen reduced symptoms and medication use and improved the quality of life of subjects with moderately severe hay fever. The 100,000-SQ-U regimen was more effective, but the 10,000-SQ-U regimen caused fewer side effects.     

Topical ocular administration of cromolyn sodium for treatment in seasonal ragweed conjunctivitis.

We studied topical ocular administration of a 4% solution of cromolyn sodium (CS)for treatment of 112 patients with ragweed conjunctivitis in two 8-wk, double-blind, matched-pair studies. During the 1977 and 1978 ragweed seasons, patients instilled a daily total of 12.8 or 19.2 mg CS into each eye, control patients received placebo drops. Treatment efficacy was assessed by daily symptom score diaries, ophthalmic examinations, and a subjective report by the patient at the end of the trials. In the 1977 trial, CS pair members whose preseasonal immunoglobulin E antibody level was <99 ng/ml showed a significant reduction in eye itching (p < 0.01), eye irritation (p < 0.02), visual blurring (p < 0.025), and nasal congestion (p < 0.025) and required less supplemental medication (p < 0.02) during the peak pollen period. In the 1978 trial all patients had IgE antibody levels >100 ng/ml. CS pair members showed a significant reduction in rhinorrhea (p < 0.004) and nasal congestion (p < 0.007) only; no significant reduction in eye symptoms was noted. Transient eye burning was noted by a total of 38 CS and 39 placebo patients from both studies; ophthalmic examinations were unremarkable; and no other side effects were noted. The 4% CS ophthalmic solution provided significant relief of nasal symptoms in both the 1977 and 1978 trials, but significant relief of ocular symptoms was noted only in the 1977 trial and only in those patients with lower preseasonal IgE ragweed antibody levels.     

Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray reduces inflammatory cells in unchallenged allergic nasal mucosa: effects of single allergen challenge

BACKGROUND: Topical corticosteroid therapy reduces symptoms and nasal mucosal inflammatory cells in patients with allergic rhinitis. Usually patients are advised to start their medication (1 week) before the beginning of the pollen season. The effect of pretreatment with a topical corticosteroid on unchallenged nasal mucosa is not well documented. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the effect of 6 weeks' pretreatment with 200 microg twice daily fluticasone propionate on nasal symptoms and inflammatory cell numbers after nasal allergen provocation in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: Nineteen patients with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis were treated for a 6-week period out of the grass pollen season. After completing the treatment period, patients were challenged with grass pollen. Nasal mucosal biopsy specimens were taken 5 times in every patient. In nasal mucosa changes in numbers of T cells, B cells, mast cells, eosinophils, macrophages, and Langerhans' cells were investigated. RESULTS: After 4 weeks of treatment but before allergen provocation, significantly fewer epithelial Langerhans' cells, macrophages, mast cells, T cells, and eosinophils were found in the fluticasone propionate group compared with those found in the placebo group. In the lamina propria significantly fewer Langerhans' cells and eosinophils were found in the fluticasone propionate group. Cell influx in nasal mucosa after allergen provocation was significantly inhibited in the fluticasone propionate group compared with that in the placebo group for epithelial Langerhans' cells, mast cells, macrophages, and T cells and for lamina propria eosinophils, mast cells, Langerhans' cells, macrophages, and T cells. CONCLUSIONS: Fluticasone propionate is effective in reducing early- and late-phase nasal symptoms. Topical corticosteroid treatment reduces inflammatory cells in unchallenged nasal mucosa.     

Comparison of a nasal glucocorticoid,antileukotriene, and a combination of antileukotriene and antihistamine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis requires active intervention for symptom relief. A combination of antileukotriene and antihistamine drugs has been suggested to provide additive treatment benefits for patients with allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated how such a combination treatment would affect symptoms and local mucosal eosinophilia in comparison with a nasal glucocorticoid. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized study 62 patients with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis received a nasal glucocorticoid (fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray [FPANS], 200 microg/d), an antileukotriene (montelukast, 10 mg/d), a combination of montelukast with an antihistamine (loratadine, 10 mg/d), or placebo throughout the season. Cromoglycate eyedrops and a limited amount of loratadine were allowed as rescue medication for severe symptoms. Patients recorded their symptoms for nasal blockage, itching, rhinorrhea, and sneezing. Before and during the season, nasal biopsy specimens were obtained from patients for evaluation of local eosinophilic inflammation. RESULTS: During the peak season, both FPANS and combined montelukast-loratadine were significantly more effective than placebo and montelukast alone for daytime symptom prevention. For nighttime symptoms, FPANS was significantly more effective compared with all other treatments, whereas combined montelukast-loratadine and montelukast alone did not provide significant symptom prevention compared with placebo. The pollen-induced increase in the numbers of epithelial eosinophils was significantly lower for FPANS-treated patients compared with that seen in all other treatment groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis, intranasal glucocorticoids are more effective than an antileukotriene drug or combined antileukotriene-antihistamine for the reduction of pollen-induced nasal eosinophilic inflammation and for control of nasal symptoms.     

Cromolyn sodium nasal solution in the prophylactic treatment of pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis.

A large-scale multicenter investigation was undertaken in 3 cities with comparable pollen seasons and atmospheric pollen concentrations in order to obtain more definite information about the safety and efficacy of cromolyn sodium in the treatment of pollen-induced seasonal rhinitis. The 9-wk double-blind study was conducted in 104 patiets in Pittsburgh, Pa., Cleveland, Ohio, and Louisville, Ky., during the 1975 ragweed season. It indicated that a nebulized 4% aqueous solution of cromolyn sodium is effective in reducing sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and ocular irritation in ragweed hay fever patients. The efficacy of the drug was notable despite the fact that patients used an average of 52 mg instead of the recommended 62.4 mg daily. Cromolyn sodium did not appear to have a significant effect on transseasonal antiragweed IgE (IgEAR) levels. Patients acceptance of the cromolyn nasal solution was good, and there were no significant adverse reactions. The side effects, which were distributed equally between the drug and placebo groups, were mild and of limited duration.     

A double-blind placebo-controlled evaluation of sublingual immunotherapy with a standardized ragweed extract in patients with seasonal rhinitis. Evidence for a dose-response relationship

BACKGROUND: There is a growing consensus on the benefits of sublingual-swallow immunotherapy in the treatment of allergic diseases. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy with standardized ragweed pollen extract tablets, in patients with an allergic rhinitis. A total of 110 outpatients were randomized (immunotherapy [I]: 55; placebo [P]: 55), of whom 99 were analyzable for efficacy (I: 48; P: 51) and 106 analyzable for safety (I: 53; P: 53). After a 28-day progression phase, the patients received a maintenance treatment during 6.5 months. Efficacy variables included a global assessment of efficacy (patient/ investigator), symptoms and medication scores as well as the frequency of asthma attacks. RESULTS: In the active treatment group, 43 patients completed the study, versus 49 on placebo. During the whole period of pollination, the difference favoring immunotherapy was highly significant for the global assessment by the patient (p = 0.004) and by the investigator (p = 0.005). Adverse reactions were reported more often in the active treatment but mild or moderate, and they abated after dose adjustment. A subgroup analysis of those patients receiving the highest dose of immunotherapy (3 tablets 3 times a week) showed a highly significant response for rhinitis and conjunctivitis total scores by comparison to lower dosages. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy and strongly suggests a dose-response relationship.     

Effect of immunotherapy on asthma progression, BHR and sputum eosinophils in allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and airway inflammation are frequently associated with allergic rhinitis, and may be important risk factors for the development of asthma. Specific immunotherapy (SIT) reduces symptom in subjects with allergic rhinitis, but the mechanisms are not clear. AIMS OF THE STUDY: To assess the effect of Parietaria-SIT on asthma progression, rhinitic symptoms, BHR, and eosinophilic inflammation. METHODS: Nonasthmatic subjects with seasonal rhinitis were randomly assigned to receive Parietaria pollen vaccine (n = 15) or matched placebo (n = 15). Data on symptoms and medication score, BHR to methacholine, eosinophilia in sputum were collected throughout the 3-year study. RESULTS: By the end of the study, in the placebo group, symptoms and medication scores significantly increased by a median (interquartile range) of 121% (15-280) and 263% (0-4400) respectively (P < 0.01), whereas no significant difference was observed in the SIT group. We found no significant changes in sputum eosinophils and BHR to methacholine in both groups throughout the study. Nine of 29 participants developed asthma symptoms during the study; of these, only two subjects (14%) in the SIT-treated group (P = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: Parietaria-SIT reduces symptom and rescue medication scores, but no changes in BHR to methacholine or sputum eosinophilia were observed. Moreover, Parietaria-SIT appears to prevent the natural progression of allergic rhinitis to asthma, suggesting that SIT should be considered earlier in the management of subjects with allergic rhinitis.     

Effects of topical budesonide and levocabastine on nasal symptoms and plasma exudation responses in seasonal allergic rhinitis

This study compares the effects of two topical nasal treatments for allergic rhinitis, budesonide and levocabastine, on symptom development during seasonal pollen exposure. Additionally, the protective effects of drug treatments on allergen-challenge-induced responses (symptoms and microvascular exudation of plasma) are examined late into the pollen season. Forty-four patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis to birch pollen participated in this single-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled study. Topical nasal treatment with either levocabastine (200 p.g b.i.d.: n = 16), budesonide (200 μg b.i.d.; n = 16), or placebo (n= 12) was instituted before the start of the pollen season and continued for 5 weeks until the end of the birch pollen season. The participants kept diaries for scores of nasal and ocular symptoms. Nasal allergen challenges with increasing doses of a birch pollen extract (10², 10³ and lC SQ-U) were carried out both before, when patients were asymptomatic and without treatment, and late into the pollen season. A nasal lavage followed each challenge, and the lavage fluid levels of albumin were measured as an index of the acute inflammatory response of the allergic mucosa. The birch pollen season was rather mild, producing only small increases in nasal symptoms. Budesonide treatment reduced the total nasal symptoms compared to placebo (P<0.01) and to levocabastine (P<0.05), while levocabastine treatment did not differ significantly from placebo. Ocular symptoms and use of rescue medication did not differ between placebo and the active treatments. At the end of the pollen season, both treatments reduced allergen-challenge-induced nasal symptoms compared to placebo (P<0.01). Only budesonide reduced allergen-challenge- induced increments of albumin levels in postchallenge nasal lavage fluids (P<0.05, in comparison with placebo). The results suggest that budesonide reduces both seasonal and allergen-challenge-induced nasal symptoms, while levocabastine is effective against allergen-challenge-induced symptoms also during the season. In addition, the topical steroid treatment, but not the antihistamine, inhibits the inflammatory exudation evoked by allergen challenge in patients with active seasonal disease.