Molecular and clinical advances in core binding factor primary acute myeloid leukemia: a paradigm for translational research in malignant hematology

Clonal chromosomal abnormalities are the most important prognostic indicators in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Recent advances in molecular biology have allowed structural and functional characterization of many of these genomic rearrangements and have provided evidence for their primary role in leukemogenesis. Two of the most prevalent cytogenetic subtypes of adult primary or de novo AML, t(8;21)(q22;q22) and inv(16)(p13q22), are characterized by disruption of the AML1(CBF alpha 2) gene at 21q22 and the CBF beta gene at 16q22, respectively. Both genes encode a subunit of core binding factor (CBF), a regulator of normal hematopoiesis. At the molecular level, t(8;21)(q22;q22) and inv(16)(p13q22) result in the creation of novel fusion genes, AML1/ETO and CBF beta/MYH11, whose structures and functions are being successfully characterized by in vitro studies and transgenic animal models. Detection of t(8;21)(q22;q22) or inv(16)(p13q22) in adult patients with primary AML is a favorable independent prognostic indicator for achievement of cure after intensive chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation and may serve as a paradigm for risk-adapted treatment in AML. The purpose of this review is to summarize the recent advances in the molecular biology and clinical management of t(8;21)(q22;q22) and inv(16)(p13q22) primary AML, collectively referred to here as CBF AML.     

Stratification of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia through cancer cell gene-expression profiling

Treatment of children's acute lymphoblastic leukemia has been at the forefront of conventional chemotherapy development. Despite outstanding results in long-term survival of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, development of therapies for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have lagged behind. AML in children demonstrate similar long-term survival compared with adults 18-65 years of age: 40-50% overall long-term survival. AML is a heterogeneous disease in both adults and children, but the presence of recurrent chromosome translocations and mutations in children are lower than in adult AML. In particular, patients without chromosome aberrancies have been examined for stratification through examination of gene expression. The paper from Baglobind and coauthors proposes a useful prognostication by gene-expression analysis of 75 gene pairs in 40% of patient cases, accurately discriminating mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) gene rearrangement, t(8;21)(q22;q22), inv(16)(p13q22), t(15;17)(q21;q22) and t(7;12)(q36;p13)-positive AML. Gene-expression analysis of AML has provided an important research tool for uncovering information about AML biology that can be used for the development of novel therapies.     

Stratification of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia through cancer cell gene-expression profiling

Evaluation of: Balgobind BV, Marry M, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM et al. Evaluation of gene expression signatures predictive for cytogenetic and molecular subtypes of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 96(2), 221–230 (2010).

Treatment of children^’s acute lymphoblastic leukemia has been at the forefront of conventional chemotherapy development. Despite outstanding results in long-term survival of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, development of therapies for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have lagged behind. AML in children demonstrate similar long-term survival compared with adults 18–65 years of age: 40–50% overall long-term survival. AML is a heterogeneous disease in both adults and children, but the presence of recurrent chromosome translocations and mutations in children are lower than in adult AML. In particular, patients without chromosome aberrancies have been examined for stratification through examination of gene expression. The paper from Baglobind and coauthors proposes a useful prognostication by gene-expression analysis of 75 gene pairs in 40% of patient cases, accurately discriminating mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) gene rearrangement, t(8;21)(q22;q22), inv(16)(p13q22), t(15;17)(q21;q22) and t(7;12)(q36;p13)-positive AML. Gene-expression analysis of AML has provided an important research tool for uncovering information about AML biology that can be used for the development of novel therapies.     

11例t(16;21)(p11;q22)急性髓系白血病病例报告并文献复习

目的:探讨11例伴t(16;21)(p11;q22)染色体易位的急性髓系白血病（acute myeloid leukemia,AML)患者的临床和实验室特点。方法:回顾性分析2007年07月至2022年03月我院收治的11例t((16;21)(p11;q22)染色体易位的AML患者临床及实验室特征并复习相关文献。结果:11例t(16;21)(p11;q22)染色体易位的白血病均为AML,FAB分型:M2型4例,M4型1例,M5型3例,AML(非M3)型3例;其中男5例,女6例。染色体R显带分析11例均可见到t(16;21)(p11;q22)染色体易位,其中9例伴有附加染色体异常。融合基因TLS/FUS-ERG检测了9例均为阳性。免疫表型除表达髓系CD34、CD117、CD33、CD13、CD38外,均表达CD56。化疗1个周期后完全缓解7例。结论:t(16;21)(p11;q22)染色体易位是一种少见的重现性染色体异常,该易位产生TLS/FUS-ERG融合基因,免疫学检测多伴CD56阳性,以AML中M2/M5型多见,化疗1个周期大部分可完全缓解,但短期内易复发,预后不良。     

Hemophagocytosis by leukemic blasts in 7 acute myeloid leukemia cases with t(16;21)(p11;q22): common morphologic characteristics for this type of leukemia

BACKGROUND: In a previous study of a case of acute megakaryoblastic leukemia with t(16;21)(p11;q22), which displayed hemophagocytosis by leukemic blasts, the authors mentioned that the same type of morphology had been cited in the literature for 4 other cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with the same translocation. This observation prompted the authors to examine more cases of AML with t(16;21)(p11;q22) for this morphology. METHODS: The authors reviewed bone marrow smears for the presence of hemophagocytosis in 7 patients with AML identified as having t(16;21)(p11;q22). RESULTS: The leukemias belonged to the FAB-M1/M7 (n = 5), M5b (n = 2), and contained phagocytic blasts in various percentages (< 0.2-36.7%). The blasts contained either single or multiple cytoplasmic vacuoles, in some of which the phagosomes were visible. The engulfed hemopoietic cells (red cells, erythroblasts, lymphocytes, and thrombocytes) were also noted in their cytoplasm. These observations confirmed that hemophagocytosis by leukemic blasts is a common and characteristic feature of this type of leukemia. CONCLUSIONS: The study of 12 cases (the 7 cases described here and the previous 5 cases) strongly supports the hypothesis that hemophagocytosis by leukemic blasts is common and characteristic in this type of leukemia, which may be related to the specific chromosome aberration of t(16;21)(p11;q22).     

"Acute myelogenous leukemia like" translocations in CML blast crisis: two new cases of inv(16)/t(16;16) and a review of the literature

We describe two patients with CML blast crisis with clonal evolution affecting 16q22 (t(16;16)(p13;q22) and inv(16)(p13;q22), abnormalities of core binding factor, usually found in de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML)). The bone marrow of both cases showed myelomonocytic (M4) differentiation and eosinophilia. Both patients had prominent extramedullary disease and had poor response to treatment. A literature search focused on patients with CML and additional chromosome changes more typical of AML, revealed that the morphology of the blasts correlated with the finding typical of the underlying "AML" cytogenetic abnormality and an overall very poor clinical outcome, even in the groups with "favorable" AML type translocations.     

Acute Myelogenous Leukemia without Maturation with a Retinoic Alpha-Receptor Deletion: A Case Report

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is characterized by a t(15;17) which fuses the 17q retinoic acid alpha-receptor sequence to the 15q PML gene sequence. The resulting fusion product plays a role in the development and maintenance of APL, and is very rarely found in other acute myeloid leukemia (AML) subtypes. Rare complex APL genomic rearrangements have retinoic acid alpha-receptor sequence deletions. Here we report a retinoic acid alpha-receptor sequence deletion in a case of AML without differentiation. To our knowledge, this is the first example of a retinoic acid alpha-receptor sequence deletion in this AML subtype.Key words: Acute myelogenous leukemia without maturation, PML/RAR?, Deletion, t(15;17)(q22;q21), Acute promyelocytic leukemia, AML-M3, AML-M1     

Cytogenetic Characteristics of de novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Southern Vietnam

Background: The cytogenetic characteristics are important factors for risk stratification at diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, cytogenetic profile of Vietnamese patients with AML remains undetermined. In this study, we present the chromosomal data of de novo AML patients in Southern Vietnam. Methods: We performed cytogenetic testing for 336 AML patients using G banding. If the patients had suspected abnormalities, fluorescence in situ hybridization with probes of inv(3)(q21q26)/t(3;3)(q21;q26), 5q31, 7q31, t(8;21)(q21.3;q22), 11q23, t(15;17)(q24;q21), inv(16)(p13q22)/t(16;16)(p13;q22)were analyzed. Patients without above aberrations or with normal karyotype were tested by fluorescence in situ hybridization using probe 11q23. Results: We found that the median age was 39 years. According to French – American – British classification, AML-M2 is the most frequent type with 35.1%. Chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 208 cases, accounting for 61.9%. Among structural abnormalities, t(15;17) was the most common (19.6%), followed by t(8;21) and inv (16)/t(16;16) in 10.1% and 6.2%, respectively. In perspective of chromosomal numerical abnornmalities, loss of sex chromosomes are the most common (7.7%), followed by +8 in 6.8%, -7/del(7q) in 4.4%, +21 in 3.9% and -5/del (5q) in 2.1%. The prevalence of addditional cytogenetic aberrations accompanying with t(8;21) and inv(16)/t(16;16) were 82.4% and 52.4%, repectively. None of +8 cases was associated with t(8;21). Regarding cytogenetic risk assessment according to European Leukemia Net 2017, there were 121 (36%) patients in favorable-risk, 180 (53.6%) in intermediate-risk and 35 (10.4%) in adverse-risk group. Conclusion: In conclusion, this is the first comprehensive cytogenetic profile of Vietnamese patients diagnosed with de novo AML, which helps clinical doctors in prognostic classification for AML patients in Southern Vietnam.     

Cytogenetic, molecular genetic, and clinical characteristics of acute myeloid leukemia with a complex karyotype

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) harboring three or more acquired chromosome aberrations in the absence of the prognostically favorable t(8;21)(q22;q22), inv(16)(p13q22)/t(6;16)(p13;q22), and t(15;17)(q22;q21) aberrations form a separate category - AML with a complex karyotype. They constitute 10% to 12% of all AML patents, with the incidence of complex karyotypes increasing with the more advanced age. Recent studies using molecular-cytogenetic techniques (spectral karyotyping [SKY], multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization [M-FISH]) and array comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH) considerably improved characterization of previously unidentified, partially identified, or cryptic chromosome aberrations, and allowed precise delineation of genomic imbalances. The emerging nonrandom pattern of abnormalities includes relative paucity, but not absence, of balanced rearrangements (translocations, insertions, or inversions), predominance of aberrations leading to loss of chromosome material (monosomies, deletions, and unbalanced translocations) that involve, in decreasing order, chromosome arms 5q, 17p, 7q, 18q, 16q, 17q, 12p, 20q, 18p, and 3p, and the presence of recurrent, albeit less frequent and often hidden (in marker chromosomes and unbalanced translocations) aberrations leading to overrepresentation of segments from 8q, 11q, 21q, 22q, 1p, 9p, and 13q. Several candidate genes have been identified as targets of genomic losses, for example, TP53, CTNNA1, NF1, ETV6, and TCF4, and amplifications, for example, ERG, ETS2, APP, ETS1, FLI1, MLL, DDX6, GAB2, MYC, TRIB1, and CDX2. Treatment outcomes of complex karyotype patients receiving chemotherapy are very poor. They can be improved to some extent by allogeneic stem cell transplantation in younger patients. It is hoped that better understanding of genomic alterations will result in identification of novel therapeutic targets and improved prognosis in patients with complex karyotypes.     

Chromosome abnormalities and MLL rearrangements in acute myeloid leukemia of infants.

Of 29 infants with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 14 (48%) had various 11q23 translocations. MLL rearrangements were examined in 21 of the 29 patients, and 11 (52%) showed the rearrangements. 11q23 translocations and/or MLL rearrangements were found in 17 (58%) of the 29 patients. While all but one of the 17 patients with 11q23/MLL rearrangements had M4 or M5 type of the FAB classification, the 12 patients without such rearrangements had various FAB types, including M2, M4, M4EO, M6 and M7. Of the 12 patients with other chromosome abnormalities or normal karyotypes, two had inv(16) ort(16;16), one had t(1;22)(p13;q13), and two had a novel translocation, t(7;12)(q32;p13). The breakpoint on 12p of the t(7;12) was assigned to intron 1 or the region just upstream of exon 1 of the TEL/ETV6 gene by fluorescence in situ hybridization. The event-free survival at 5 years for the 17 patients with 11q23/MLL rearrangements was 42.2%, and that for the 12 patients without such rearrangements was 31.3% (P = 0.5544). 11q231MLL rearrangements have been frequently reported and a poor prognosis in infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia implied. Our study showed that while 11q23/MLL rearrangements were also common in infant AML, AML infants with such rearrangements had a clinical outcome similar to that of AML infants without such rearrangements.     

Three way translocation in a new variant of t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia involving Xp22

The t(8;21)(q22;q22) is one of the most frequent chromosomal abnormality associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) M2 sub type. The additional chromosomal abnormalities including structural and numerical are frequently reported with the translocation, t (8;21)(q22;q22). We report a case of AML-M2 with t(X;8;21)(p22;q22;q22) associated with loss of Y chromosome. Using a dual color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis with ETO and AML1 probes, we demonstrated an ETO/AML1 fusion signal on the derivative chromosome 8 and one ETO signal on derivative Chromosome Xp22. The patient did not respond to therapy and follow-up of cytogenetics revealed same chromosome abnormality. Hence, this three way translocation involving X chromosome might be associated with poor prognosis.     

Prognostic of Core Binding Factor (CBF) Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Complex Karyotype

BackgroundCore-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF AML) with recurrent genetic abnormalities inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22)/ CBFB-MYH11 are usually prognostically favorable but heterogeneous group and additional abnormalities change their prognosis.Materials and MethodsTo evaluate the impact of a complex karyotype on CBF AML prognosis, we included 24 patients with a median age of 56.4 years (23.2-83.3) and a median number of abnormalities of 5 (4-13).ResultsMedian follow-up was 110.4 months. Among patients with a primary clone, complete remission (CR) was reached in 66.7% of patients. 31.3% of patients experienced AML relapse with a median of 8.5 months. Median OS for transplanted patients was 80.7 versus 40.5 months for non-transplanted patients, excluding the 4 patients with early death. Among patients harboring AML with clonal evolution, CR was reached in 62.5% of patients. 50% of patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). In these, median RFS was 19.3 versus 0 months in non-transplanted patients. Median OS seemed also longer in transplanted patients with 23.5 versus 2.95 months in non-transplanted.ConclusionUse of new treatment and tailored strategy based on measurable residual disease monitoring may now improve these results. However, these data allow us to reconsider the good prognosis historically associated with CBF patients despite of karyotype and the place of ASCT in the strategy.     

Acute myeloid leukemia with inv(8)(p11q13)

A patient with acute monoblastic leukemia (AML M5a) and the pericentric inversion inv(8)(p11q13) as well as additional chromosome abnormalities in her bone marrow cells is described. This is the fourth known case of inv(8)(p11q13)-positive acute leukemia, and the second such case in which gain of 1q material occurred during clonal evolution. All patients with acute leukemia and inv(8)(p11q13) have been females, most have been young, and there has been a tendency for the disease to run an aggressive course. Both hematologically and cytogenetically, therefore, inv(8)(p11q13)-positive leukemia may be viewed as a variant of AML with t(8;16)(p11;p13). This similarity is also apparent at the molecular genetic level, in-as-much as the MOZ gene in 8p11 is rearranged in both the translocation and the inversion; in t(8;16)-positive leukemia, a MOZ-CBP chimeric gene is generated, whereas inv(8) has been shown to generate a MOZ-TIF2 fusion gene. Southern blot analysis of the present case after MOZ0.8 hybridization of Bam HI digested DNA gave an 11 kb aberrant band in addition to the germline band, corresponding to a breakpoint immediately upstream of the 4 kb long MOZ exon that begins at position 3746. Also previously investigated inv(8)-positive leukemias have shown breaks in this intron indicating that it contains sequence motifs predisposing to illegitimate recombination.     

Conventional cytogenetics and breakpoint distribution by fluorescent in situ hybridization in patients with malignant hemopathies associated with inv(3)(q21;q26) and t(3;3)(q21;q26)

Inv(3)(q21q26)/t(3;3)(q21;q26) is recognized as a distinctive entity of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with recurrent genetic abnormalities of prognostic significance. It occurs in 1-2.5% of AML and is also observed in myelodysplastic syndromes and in the blastic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia. The molecular consequence of the inv(3)/t(3;3) rearrangements is the juxtaposition of the ribophorin I (RPN1) gene (located in band 3q21) with the ecotropic viral integration site 1 (EVI1) gene (located in band 3q26.2). Following conventional cytogenetics to determine the karyotype, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with a panel of bacterial artificial chromosome clones was used to map the breakpoints involved in 15 inv(3)/t(3;3). Inv(3) or t(3;3) was the sole karyotypic anomaly in 6 patients, while additional abnormalities were identified in the remaining 9 patients, including 4 with monosomy of chromosome7 (-7) or a deletion of its long arm (7q-). Breakpoints in band 3q21 were distributed in a 235 kb region centromeric to and including the RPN1 locus, while those in band 3q26.2 were scattered in a 900 kb region located on each side of and including the EVI1 locus. In contrast to most of the inversions and translocations associated with AML that lead to fusion genes, inv(3)/t(3;3) does not generate a chimeric gene, but rather induces gene overexpression. The wide dispersion of the breakpoints in bands 3q21 and 3q26 and the heterogeneity of the genomic consequences could explain why the mechanisms leading to leukemogenesis are still poorly understood. Therefore, it is important to further characterize these chromosomal abnormalities by FISH.