The morphine sparing effect of ketorolac tromethamine

A randomised, double-blind study of patients after upper abdominal surgery was undertaken to assess the analgesic efficacy of ketorolac tromethamine, a new, parenteral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent. Postoperatively, patients received a 24-hour intramuscular infusion of either saline (n = 20), ketorolac 1.5 mg/hour (n = 21) or ketorolac 3.0 mg/hour (n = 20). Cumulative morphine requirements were measured using a patient-controlled analgesia system which delivered intravenous increments of morphine on demand. Pain was assessed by visual analogue scores. Arterial blood gas analyses were performed pre-operatively and on the first postoperative day. Patients who received low and high dose ketorolac infusions required less morphine than the control group (p less than 0.05 and p = 0.06, respectively). This was associated with significantly lower pain scores. Patients who received the higher ketorolac dose had significantly less postoperative increase in arterial carbon dioxide tensions than controls. This study suggests that ketorolac tromethamine is a useful analgesic drug with significant morphine sparing properties.     

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Parecoxib Sodium in Relieving Acute Postoperative Pain following Gynecologic Laparotomy Surgery

Background: This study tested the hypothesis that an injectable cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-specific inhibitor will be at least as effective and well tolerated as a COX-nonspecific conventional nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) by comparing the analgesic efficacy and tolerability of one intravenous dose of parecoxib sodium, an injectable prodrug of the novel COX-2-specific inhibitor, valdecoxib, with ketorolac and placebo in postoperative laparotomy surgery patients. Intravenous morphine, 4 mg, was studied as a positive analgesic control.

Methods: In this multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study, women experiencing moderate-to-severe pain on the first day after abdominal hysterectomy or myomectomy received one intravenous dose of parecoxib sodium, 20 or 40 mg, ketorolac, 30 mg, morphine, 4 mg, or placebo. Analgesic efficacy and tolerability were evaluated for 24 h postdose or until patients, whose pain was not adequately controlled, opted to receive rescue analgesia.

Results: Two hundred two patients were enrolled. All treatment groups had comparable demographics and baseline pain status. All active treatments had an equally rapid time to onset of analgesia (10-23 min). Overall, each parecoxib sodium dose and ketorolac were significantly superior to morphine and placebo for most measures of analgesic efficacy at most time points, including a significantly longer (two- to threefold) time to rescue analgesia (P <= 0.05). All treatments were well tolerated.     

Efficacy and safety of intravenous parecoxib sodium in relieving acute postoperative pain following gynecologic laparotomy surgery

BACKGROUND: This study tested the hypothesis that an injectable cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-specific inhibitor will be at least as effective and well tolerated as a COX-nonspecific conventional nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) by comparing the analgesic efficacy and tolerability of one intravenous dose of parecoxib sodium, an injectable prodrug of the novel COX-2-specific inhibitor, valdecoxib, with ketorolac and placebo in postoperative laparotomy surgery patients. Intravenous morphine, 4 mg, was studied as a positive analgesic control. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study, women experiencing moderate-to-severe pain on the first day after abdominal hysterectomy or myomectomy received one intravenous dose of parecoxib sodium, 20 or 40 mg, ketorolac, 30 mg, morphine, 4 mg, or placebo. Analgesic efficacy and tolerability were evaluated for 24 h postdose or until patients, whose pain was not adequately controlled, opted to receive rescue analgesia. RESULTS: Two hundred two patients were enrolled. All treatment groups had comparable demographics and baseline pain status. All active treatments had an equally rapid time to onset of analgesia (10-23 min). Overall, each parecoxib sodium dose and ketorolac were significantly superior to morphine and placebo for most measures of analgesic efficacy at most time points, including a significantly longer (two- to threefold) time to rescue analgesia (P 相似文献   

Comparison of ketorolac and morphine as adjuvants during pediatric surgery.

The intraoperative use of opioid analgesics decreases the volatile anesthetic requirement and provides for pain relief in the early postoperative period. In a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving 95 ASA physical status 1 or 2 children (ages 5-15 yr) undergoing general anesthesia for elective operations, we compared postoperative analgesia following the intraoperative intravenous (iv) administration of ketorolac, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug or morphine, an opioid analgesic. After induction of general anesthesia and before the start of the surgical procedure, children received equal volumes of saline, morphine (0.1 mg.kg-1, iv) or ketorolac (0.9 mg.kg-1, iv). Postoperative pain was evaluated by the child using a 10-cm linear visual analog scale (VAS) and by a blinded observer using both a VAS and an objective pain scale (OPS) in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). There were no statistically significant differences in the VAS and OPS scores in the PACU or in the postoperative analgesic requirements in children receiving morphine or ketorolac. The placebo group had a significantly higher VAS and OPS score and required earlier and more frequent analgesic therapy in the PACU compared to the two analgesic groups. Patients receiving ketorolac had less postoperative emesis than those receiving morphine. We conclude that ketorolac (0.9 mg.kg-1) is an effective alternative to morphine (0.1 mg.kg-1) as an iv adjuvant during general anesthesia, and in the dose used in this study, is associated with less postoperative nausea and vomiting in children.     

Preemptive analgesic effects of ketorolac in ankle fracture surgery

BACKGROUND: Preemptive analgesia has been difficult to show in human experiments. If ketorolac has preemptive effects, then there may be an advantage to administering it at the beginning of surgery despite the potential for increased blood loss. METHODS: The authors performed a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of 48 patients scheduled for ankle fracture surgery in a county trauma hospital. Anesthesia management was standardized and included adequate opioid analgesia (5 microg/kg fentanyl and 0.1 mg/kg morphine). Intravenous 30 mg ketorolac was administered to 23 patients before tourniquet inflation and to 25 patients after tourniquet inflation. Visual analog scale pain scores, morphine patient-controlled analgesia consumption, nausea-vomiting, and postoperative bleeding were measured. RESULTS: The 23 patients given ketorolac before tourniquet inflation had no increase in pain postoperatively compared with their preoperative baseline (P = 0.280). The 25 patients who received ketorolac minutes later after tourniquet inflation had significant increases in their postoperative pain compared with their preoperative baseline (P = 0.00116). This effect was short-lived, and by 6 h the pain score in this group was not significantly more than it was preoperatively. Intergroup comparison showed a lower visual analog scale score at 2 (P = 0.0203) and 4 h (P = 0.00549) in the preemptive group and lower nausea scores at hour 6 (P = 0.00704). There was no difference in patient-controlled analgesia consumption between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous 30 mg ketorolac appears to have preemptive analgesic effects in patients undergoing ankle fracture repair. Ketorolac administered before tourniquet inflation prevents postoperative pain being perceived as more intense than preoperative pain.     

Propacetamol versus ketorolac for treatment of acute postoperative pain after total hip or knee replacement

We assessed the analgesic efficacy of IV propacetamol and ketorolac in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled study involving patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement procedures. On the first morning after major joint replacement surgery, 164 patients experiencing moderate-to-severe pain were randomly assigned to receive an IV infusion of propacetamol (2 g), ketorolac (15 or 30 mg), or placebo (saline). Patient-controlled analgesia with morphine was made available as a "rescue" analgesic on patient's request during the 6-h postdosing evaluation period. The median time to onset of analgesia with propacetamol (8 [95% confidence interval 6,10] min) was shorter than ketorolac 15 mg (14 [7,16] min), and placebo (16 [8; not estimable] min) although the differences did not reach statistical significance. However, compared with ketorolac 30 mg, propacetamol had a shorter duration of analgesia (3.5 [2;5.4] vs 6 [3.3; not estimable] h). Analysis of pain intensity and pain relief scores demonstrated that propacetamol produced a significantly greater improvement in pain relief than saline from 45 min until 5 h after the injection. Propacetamol was not significantly different from ketorolac 15 mg and 30 mg with respect to the main analgesic efficacy variables during the 6-h assessment period. The most frequently reported adverse event with propacetamol was injection site pain (28% vs 19% for ketorolac 15 mg, 29% for ketorolac 30 mg, and 10% for placebo, respectively). In conclusion, propacetamol (2 g IV) possesses a similar analgesic efficacy to ketorolac (15 or 30 mg IV) after total hip or knee replacement surgery.     

Comparative evaluation of ciramadol (WY-15.705), morphine and placebo for treatment of postoperative pain

The efficacy and safety of intramuscular ciramadol to alleviate postoperative pain was compared to morphine in a double-blind placebo controlled study of 100 patients. Postoperative analgesia was assessed using a visual analog scale and two categorical measurements. Two dose levels of ciramadol (30 and 60 mg) were compared to morphine (5 and 10 mg). A valid dose-response curve was obtained for both drugs with no significant deviation from parallelism. Compared to morphine 10 mg, ciramadol 60 mg induced a faster onset of analgesia and showed a longer lasting effect as deduced from the pain intensity difference and pain analog intensity difference time-effect curves (P less than 0.01). All active therapy groups provided better analgesia than the placebo group. The estimated relative analgesic potency of ciramadol to morphine was 0.3 to 1. Some increase in sedation level was seen following therapy in each group with the largest increase in the ciramadol 60 mg group. There was no statistically meaningful among group differences in the adverse experience incidence rates. Postoperative respiratory function showed a significant decrease from the baseline respiration rate in the ciramadol 60 mg group, although respiration rate was notably reduced in each active therapy group more than in the placebo group. Blood pressure was not impaired following ciramadol whereas morphine 10 mg induced a significant decrease in diastolic blood pressure.     

The efficacy of intramuscular ketorolac in combination with intravenous PCA morphine for postoperative pain relief.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of intramuscular (IM) ketorolac used in combination with intravenous (IV) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine for postoperative pain relief following intra-abdominal gynecologic surgery. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Patient care unit at a university medical center. PATIENTS: Thirty-five healthy women undergoing intra-abdominal gynecologic surgery who requested postoperative PCA. INTERVENTIONS: Postoperatively, all patients received IV PCA morphine, with the PCA device programmed to deliver a maximum of 1 mg every 6 minutes (maximum of 30 mg over 4 hours). In addition, patients received one of three regimens: (1) IM saline every 6 hours; (2) IM ketorolac 30 mg while in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), followed by 15 mg every 6 hours; or (3) IM ketorolac 60 mg while in the PACU, followed by 30 mg every 6 hours. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were assessed at regular intervals. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores were used to assess analgesia and patient satisfaction with therapy. Data on morphine usage were obtained from the PCA device, and the frequency and severity of adverse effects were assessed for the presence or absence of side effects. Cumulative morphine dosages were lower (p less than 0.05) in both ketorolac groups at 12, 18, and 24 hours. VAS scores and the frequency of side effects did not differ significantly among groups. CONCLUSIONS: IM ketorolac significantly decreased PCA morphine requirements. The analgesic effects of the two drugs appear to be additive.     

Comparison of intramuscular ketorolac and morphine in pain control after laparotomy

Ketorolac, a prostaglandin synthetase-inhibiting analgesic, was compared with morphine for relief of pain after laparotomy for gynaecological surgery. Eighty patients were studied; they were given either ketorolac 30 mg intramuscularly followed by 10 mg 4-hourly as required, or morphine 10 mg intramuscularly 4-hourly as required, administered in a double-blind, randomised fashion. Pain scores (verbal and visual analogue) were recorded at baseline and assessed at 30 and 60 minutes and then hourly for 6 hours. Pain relief was measured at the same times. Pain and pain-relief scores were further assessed on the evening of day 1 and at 24 hours. Pain scores were similar in the two groups but pain-relief scores were better in the morphine group. A considerable number of patients suffered postoperative nausea and vomiting but there was no difference between the groups. One patient in the ketorolac group had unexplained hypotension. It is concluded that ketorolac can provide effective postoperative analgesia.     

Intravenous parecoxib sodium foracute pain after orthopedic knee surgery

Our objective in a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo- and active-controlled study was to evaluate and compare the analgesic effectiveness of single intravenous (IV) doses of parecoxib sodium 20 and 40 mg, morphine 4 mg, and ketorolac 30 mg in the postsurgical orthopedic pain model. After undergoing unilateral total knee replacement surgery, 208 healthy adult patients were randomized to receive placebo or a study drug within 6 hours of discontinuation of patient-controlled analgesia on postoperative day 1. Onset of analgesia was similarly rapid with IV parecoxib sodium 40 mg, morphine, and ketorolac. Level and duration of analgesia were significantly superior with parecoxib sodium than with morphine and were similar for parecoxib sodium and ketorolac. Parecoxib sodium was safe and well tolerated. In conclusion, IV parecoxib sodium 40 mg is as effective as ketorolac 30 mg and is more effective than morphine 4 mg and therefore has potential widespread utility in acute postoperative pain management.     

Prospective double-blind study of effect of ketorolac administration after laparoscopic urologic surgery

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To decrease postoperative dependence on narcotics for analgesia, we have evaluated ketorolac as an adjunct to perioperative pain control in patients undergoing laparoscopic urologic surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-five patients (34 male, 31 female) were randomized to receive either ketorolac tromethamine (15-30 mg IV q 6 h) or placebo prior to laparoscopic surgery. Patient-controlled analgesia in the form of morphine sulfate was provided. Operative factors such as the type of surgery, operative time, and estimated blood loss were recorded. Postoperative factors such as analog pain score (range 0-10), narcotic usage, and length of stay were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients completed the study. The average pain score was 2.2 and 4.5 for the ketorolac and placebo groups, respectively (P < 0.005). The mean amounts of total morphine used were 39.2 mg (ketorolac) and 62.5 mg (placebo) (P = 0.077). The length of stay was not significantly different in the ketorolac (2.5 days) and placebo (2.6 days) groups (P = 0.74). Operative times (P = 0.21) and estimated blood loss (P = 0.60) were not significantly different in the two groups. Ketorolac did not adversely affect renal function; serum creatinine changes were not significantly different from those in the patients receiving placebo (P = 0.50). Laparoscopic pyeloplasty necessitated more narcotic analgesia than did other laparoscopic procedures (P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ketorolac decreases the subjective perception of pain after laparoscopic urologic surgery. It is suggested that ketorolac administration decreases the amount of narcotic usage as well. Time to resumption of oral intake and length of hospital stay were not influenced by use of ketorolac.     

Preemptive Analgesic Effects of Ketorolac in Ankle Fracture Surgery

Background: Preemptive analgesia has been difficult to show in human experiments. If ketorolac has preemptive effects, then there may be an advantage to administering it at the beginning of surgery despite the potential for increased blood loss.

Methods: The authors performed a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of 48 patients scheduled for ankle fracture surgery in a county trauma hospital. Anesthesia management was standardized and included adequate opioid analgesia (5 [mu]g/kg fentanyl and 0.1 mg/kg morphine). Intravenous 30 mg ketorolac was administered to 23 patients before tourniquet inflation and to 25 patients after tourniquet inflation. Visual analog scale pain scores, morphine patient-controlled analgesia consumption, nausea-vomiting, and postoperative bleeding were measured.

Results: The 23 patients given ketorolac before tourniquet inflation had no increase in pain postoperatively compared with their preoperative baseline (P = 0.280). The 25 patients who received ketorolac minutes later after tourniquet inflation had significant increases in their postoperative pain compared with their preoperative baseline (P = 0.00116). This effect was short-lived, and by 6 h the pain score in this group was not significantly more than it was preoperatively. Intergroup comparison showed a lower visual analog scale score at 2 (P = 0.0203) and 4 h (P = 0.00549) in the preemptive group and lower nausea scores at hour 6 (P = 0.00704). There was no difference in patient-controlled analgesia consumption between groups.     

Comparison of ketorolac and morphine for postoperative pain after major surgery

This study was designed to determine the relative analgesic efficacy and safety of single intramuscular injections of ketorolac (10 mg or 30 mg) and morphine (10 mg) in patients of either sex with moderate to severe pain after major surgery. In a single-dose, randomised, double-blind study of parallel design, pain was assessed immediately before injection of test medication and at regular intervals for 8 h thereafter. One hundred and seventeen patients (109 undergoing cardiac surgery; 8 lung surgery) were randomized to one of the three treatment groups. Pain intensity was assessed using a 5-point verbal scale before administration of study drugs. Postadministration, at 30 min and hourly for 8 h, pain intensity and pain relief were assessed, again using the 5-point verbal scale. Additionally, as a measure of analgesia, forced expiratory volume (FEV1) was obtained in all patients. Vital signs including blood pressure, pulse, temperature, respiratory rate and blood gases (PaCO2) were recorded prior to and after study medication. Based on hourly pain intensity differences and hourly pain relief observations, ketorolac 10 mg was generally more effective than morphine 10 mg, and ketorolac 30 mg was generally more effective than ketorolac 10 mg. The results of this study show that ketorolac is an effective and safe (with regard to arterial pressure, blood gases and lung function) analgesic for relief of postoperative pain after major surgery in stable patients. No clinically significant adverse effects occurred during the study. One cannot exclude an influence on patients with organ system dysfunction or on parameters not measured in this study.     

A double-blind comparison of multiple intramuscular doses of ciramadol, morphine, and placebo for the treatment of postoperative pain

Ciramadol, an agonist-antagonist analgesic (in intramuscular doses of 30 and 60 mg) was compared with 10 mg of morphine and placebo in a double-blind, parallel study in 160 patients with postoperative pain. The patients were assigned randomly to one of the four treatment groups and could receive a dose of the medication every 3 hr as needed for 48 hr; a maximum of six doses was allowed in a 24-hr period. Formal efficacy assessments using standard pain intensity and pain relief scales were restricted to the initial dose period. The three active therapy groups had significantly (P less than 0.05) higher analgesia scores than the placebo group on all efficacy scales. The mean cumulative efficacy scores for the initial dose evaluation were highest for 60 mg of ciramadol; however, patients' overall evaluations of therapy were highest in the morphine group. Nausea and vomiting were the most frequent adverse experiences (15-25% incidence); however, there were no statistically significant differences between groups in their occurrence. A greater percentage (P less than 0.05) of patients reported skin reactions in the 60 mg ciramadol group (15%) than in the 30 mg ciramadol (0%) and placebo (0%) groups. Sedation was slightly higher with the active therapies than with placebo. Changes in vital signs were minimal. It is concluded that 60 mg of ciramadol compares favorably with 10 mg of morphine as a postoperative analgesic.     

Low-dose intra-articular ketorolac for pain relief following arthroscopy of the knee joint

The systemic administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents has been shown to improve analgesia following arthroscopy of the knee joint. Ketorolac 60 mg, when given intra-articularly, provides better postoperative analgesia than an identical dose administered systemically. We compared the postoperative analgesic effect of ketorolac 10 mg given intravenously with 5 mg intra-articularly in 60 patients undergoing arthroscopy of the knee joint under general anaesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated in a double-blind manner to receive 0.25% bupivacaine 20 ml and ketorolac 5 mg intra-articularly (n = 27) or intravenous ketorolac 10 mg followed by 0.25% bupivicaine 20 ml (n = 30) at the end of surgery. There were no differences between the groups in terms of their physical characteristics or in the nature of procedure performed. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in time to first analgesia or postoperative visual analogue pain scores at 1, 2 and 4 h (p = 0.6). The median consumption of a standard analgesic was reduced in the intra-articular group in the second 24-h period but this did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.08). Only five patients in total needed postoperative morphine. A reduced amount of locally applied ketorolac (5 mg) provides similar analgesia to a higher systemic dose (10 mg) following knee arthroscopy.     

Preoperative ketorolac administration has no preemptive analgesic effect for minor orthopaedic surgery

The utility of preoperative ketorolac administration to reduce the intensity and duration of postoperative pain was compared with placebo in a randomized double-blind design of 60 ASA 1–2 patients scheduled for minor orthopaedic surgery. No opioids nor local anaesthetic blocks were used during surgery. The patients received either 30 mg ketorolac IV before surgery followed by a placebo injection after surgery or the reverse. Postoperative pain intensity was assessed repeatedly for 6 h using a visual analogue scale. No differences in pain intensity were observed between the two groups except for the initial 15-min postoperative assesments in the ketorolac group. The time to first rescue morphine administration and the total morphine consumption during the 6-h observation period were similar. It is concluded that the preoperative administration of ketorolac did not provide a significant preemptive analgesic benefit with regard to postoperative pain relief and opioid dose-sparing effect.     

Local infiltration analgesia is not improved by postoperative intra-articular bolus injections for pain after total hip arthroplasty

Background and purpose — The effect of postoperative intra-articular bolus injections after total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains unclear. We tested the hypothesis that intra-articular bolus injections administered every 6 hours after surgery during the first 24 hours would significantly improve analgesia after THA.

Patients and methods — 80 patients undergoing THA received high-volume local infiltration analgesia (LIA; 200 mg ropivacaine and 30 mg ketorolac) followed by 4 intra-articular injections with either ropivacaine (100 mg) and ketorolac (15 mg) (the treatment group) or saline (the control group). The intra-articular injections were combined with 4 intravenous injections of either saline (treatment group) or 15 mg ketorolac (control group). All patients received morphine as patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). The primary outcome was consumption of intravenous morphine PCA and secondary outcomes were consumption of oral morphine, pain intensity, side effects, readiness for hospital discharge, length of hospital stay, and postoperative consumption of analgesics at 3, 6, and 12 weeks after surgery.

Results — There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups regarding postoperative consumption of intravenous morphine PCA. Postoperative pain scores during walking were higher in the treatment group from 24–72 hours after surgery, but other pain scores were similar between groups. Time to readiness for hospital discharge was longer in the treatment group. Other secondary outcomes were similar between groups.

Interpretation — Postoperative intra-articular bolus injections of ropivacaine and ketorolac cannot be recommended as analgesic method after THA.     

The analgesic efficacy of tramadol versus ketorolac in day-case laparoscopic sterilisation

We conducted a prospective, randomised, double-blind study to compare the analgesic efficacy of intravenous tramadol 1.5 mg.kg-1 and ketorolac 10 mg in 60 ASA grade 1 and 2 patients scheduled to undergo day-case laparoscopic sterilisation by application of Filshie clips. Patients who received tramadol had significantly less postoperative pain in the recovery room (p = 0.007) and at discharge from the day-surgery unit (p = 0.03), and they required rescue analgesia with morphine less often (p = 0.02) than patients who received ketorolac. No difference in either the incidence or severity of nausea and vomiting was observed between the two groups. Both analgesic drugs were well tolerated at the doses given in the study, although dry mouth was significantly more common after the administration of tramadol (p = 0.009). Three patients in the tramadol group and five in the ketorolac group required overnight admission due to pain or nausea and vomiting.     

Comparison of morphine, ketorolac, and their combination for postoperative pain: results from a large, randomized, double-blind trial

BACKGROUND: Meta-analyses report similar numbers needed to treat for nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids. Differences in baseline pain intensity among the studies from which these numbers needed to treat were derived may have confounded the results. NSAIDs have an opioid-sparing effect, but the importance of this effect is unclear. Therefore, the authors sought to compare the proportions of subjects who obtain pain relief with ketorolac versus morphine after surgery and to determine whether the opioid-sparing effect of an NSAID reduces the magnitude of opioid side effects. METHODS: The study was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. The authors randomly assigned 1,003 adult patients to receive 30 mg ketorolac or 0.1 mg/kg morphine intravenously. They calculated the proportion of subjects who achieved at least 50% reduction in pain intensity 30 min after analgesic administration. Further, so long as pain intensity 30 min after analgesic administration was 5 or more out of 10, patients received 2.5 mg morphine every 10 min until pain intensity was 4 or less out of 10. The authors assessed the presence of opioid-related side effects. RESULTS: Five hundred patients received morphine and 503 received ketorolac. Fifty percent of patients in the morphine group achieved pain relief, compared with 31% in the ketorolac group (difference, 19%; 95% confidence interval, 13-25%). The ketorolac-morphine group required less morphine (difference, 6.5 mg; 95% confidence interval, -5.8 to -7.2) and had a lower incidence of side effects (difference, 11%; 95% confidence interval, 5-16%) than the morphine group. CONCLUSIONS: Opioids are more efficacious analgesics than NSAIDs, although historic data for these two drugs yield similar numbers needed to treat. Adding NSAIDs to the opioid treatment reduces morphine requirements and opioid-related side effects in the early postoperative period.     

Postoperative Pain After Lumbar Disc Surgery: A Comparison Between Parenteral Ketorolac and Narcotics

Summary  Objective. Lumbar discectomy is a common elective surgical procedure but many patients still experience postoperative back pain which may delay hospital discharge. We therefore evaluated the efficacy of a parenteral non-steroidal antiinflammatory agent, ketorolac, for the management of post-surgical pain.  Methods. Fifty three patients undergoing lumbar discectomy at a Medical School affiliated Veterans Administration hospital were randomly assigned to receive either: 1) 30 mg intramuscular ketorolac upon surgical closure and every 6 hours for 36 hours and narcotic analgesics as needed (PRN); or 2) only narcotic analgesics as needed. A blinded observer recorded the average, minimum and maximum postoperative pain intensity using a Numeric Pain Intensity Scale; total postoperative narcotic consumption, complications, length of hospitalization (from surgery to discharge) and outcome at 6 weeks.  Results. The patients who received ketorolac reported significantly lower average (p<0.001), minimum (p<0.001), and maximum (p<0.001) pain scores than patients receiving only narcotic analgesics. Cumulative narcotic doses (standardized to parenteral morphine) were significantly lower in the ketorolac group (p< 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups in the frequency of side effects, and no complication specifically associated with ketorolac use was observed. Mean length of hospitalization was significantly shorter (p=0.05) in patients receiving ketorolac than in patients receiving only narcotics. Six weeks after surgery 5 (19.2%) patients who received only narcotics were troubled by persistent back pain. By contrast, all patients who received ketorolac were free of back pain at follow-up (p=0.03).  Conclusions. These results suggest that ketorolac, when used with PRN narcotics, is more effective than PRN narcotics alone for postoperative pain following lumbar disc surgery. In addition, this strategy also may contribute to early discharge from hospital after lumbar disc surgery.