Phase I trial of the combination of irinotecan, paclitaxel, and carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose, toxicities, and dose suitable for phase II/III trials of irinotecan (CPT-11) combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were enrolled to this multicenter, phase I study. The initial regimen was paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2)/3 h, followed by carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 6 over 30 minutes on day 1, and CPT-11 starting at 40 mg/m(2) over 90 minutes, days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in three of seven patients. The regimen was amended, with doses reduced to paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2)/3 h, carboplatin AUC 5 and CPT-11 at 40 mg/m(2), all on day 1 every 3 weeks. Dose escalation of CPT-11 proceeded to 80 mg/m(2) then 125 mg/m(2) before dose-limiting toxicities were experienced. Subsequent patients received an intermediate CPT-11 dose of 100 mg/m(2). RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were enrolled; 32 patients were assessable for safety, and 31 were assessable for tumor response. The primary first-cycle dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia and diarrhea. The most common grade 3/4 toxicity observed during all cycles was neutropenia (16 patients [50%], with six [19%] developing neutropenic fever). Objective tumor response was observed in 39% (12/31, 95% confidence interval, 22% to 58%). The median time to tumor progression was 6.8 months, median survival 11.0 months, and 1-year survival probability 0.46. CONCLUSION: CPT-11 100 mg/m(2), paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2), and carboplatin AUC 5 given every 3 weeks can be safely administered in patients with advanced NSCLC. Neutropenia and diarrhea are the dose-limiting toxicities. The combination shows appreciable activity, and survival data are favorable.     

Phase I trial of carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel administered weekly in combination with carboplatin and to assess its dose limiting toxicity and preliminary activity in patients with previously untreated, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: Carboplatin was administered at a fixed dose that maintained an area under the curve of 6. Paclitaxel was given over 1 h once a week for 3 weeks starting at 60 mg/m(2) and escalated in 10 mg/m(2) increments. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were treated with six dose levels (60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110 mg/m(2)) of paclitaxel. The dose limiting toxicity was infection and the maximum tolerated dose was 110 mg/m(2). Nine of 21 (42.9%) patients demonstrated a therapeutic response. CONCLUSION: Weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin were well tolerated. Based on our results, 100 mg/m(2) of paclitaxel for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle, in combination with carboplatin, was recommended for a phase II study.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of carboplatin and paclitaxel with a biweekly schedule in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: A phase I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of carboplatin in combination with paclitaxel using a biweekly schedule in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel were determined preliminarily in some patients. The criteria for eligibility for study entry included histologically and/or cytologically confirmed NSCLC (stage IIIb or IV), no prior treatment, and measurable disease. Paclitaxel was given in combination with a fixed dose of carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 3 mg/ml x min, every 2 weeks. The starting dose of paclitaxel was 100 mg/m(2), and the dose was increased in increments of 20 mg/m(2). Three to six patients were allocated to each dose level. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients (11 male and 8 female) with a median age of 61 years (range 43-74 years) and a median ECOG performance status of 0 (range 0-1) were enrolled. The MTD of paclitaxel proved to be 160 mg/m(2), and the DLT was neutropenia, which improved well following treatment with G-CSF. Gastrointestinal toxicity was well tolerated. Of 17 patients who received four cycles or more, 7 (41%; 95% confidence interval 18.4-67.1%) responded to this combination therapy. The pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel did not differ from published data. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose for phase II study is paclitaxel 140 mg/m(2) with a carboplatin AUC of 3 mg/ml.min. This biweekly regimen is highly effective and acceptable, and the present data indicate that the regimen may be suitable for use on an outpatient basis.     

Gemcitabine and paclitaxel: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess possible pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between gemcitabine and paclitaxel in a phase I/II study in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with advanced NSCLC received the following in a 3-week schedule: gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) (30 minutes, days 1 and 8) and paclitaxel 150 (n = 9) or 200 mg/m(2) (n = 9) before gemcitabine (3 hours, day 1). Plasma pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in mononuclear cells were studied. RESULTS: Gemcitabine did not influence paclitaxel pharmacokinetics at 150 and 200 mg/m(2) (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC], 7.7 and 8.8 micromol/ L. h, respectively; maximum plasma concentration [C(max)], 3.2 and 4.0 micromol/L, respectively), and paclitaxel did not influence that of gemcitabine (C(max), 30 +/- 3 micromol/L) and 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine. Paclitaxel, however, dose-dependently increased the C(max) of gemcitabine triphosphate (dFdCTP), the active metabolite of gemcitabine, from 55 +/- 10 to 106 +/- 16 pmol/10(6) cells.( )No significant difference in the AUC of dFdCTP was observed. Moreover, the gemcitabine-paclitaxel combination significantly increased ribonucleotide levels, most pronounced for adenosine triphosphate (six- to seven-fold). Postinfusion paclitaxel AUC was related to pretreatment hepatic function (bilirubin: r = 0. 79; P <.001) and to the percentage decrease in platelets (r = 0.61; P =.009). The latter was also related to the duration of paclitaxel concentration above 0.1 micromol/L (r = 0.62; P =.007). Gemcitabine C(max )was related to the percentage decrease in platelets (r = 0. 58; P =.01), pretreatment hepatic function (bilirubin: r = 0.77; P <. 001), and to plasma creatinine (r = 0.5; P =.03). The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were not related to response or survival. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine and paclitaxel pharmacokinetics were related to the percentage decrease in platelets. Paclitaxel did not affect the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine, nor did gemcitabine affect the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel, but paclitaxel increased dFdCTP accumulation. This might enhance the antitumor activity of gemcitabine.     

A randomized,phase III multicenter trial of gemcitabine in combination with carboplatin or paclitaxel versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

BackgroundPaclitaxel–carboplatin is used as the standard regimen for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This trial was designed to compare gemcitabine + carboplatin or gemcitabine + paclitaxel to the standard regimen.Patients and methodsA total of 1135 chemonaive patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were randomly allocated to receive gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) 5.5 on day 1 (GC), gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m² on day 1 (GP), or paclitaxel 225 mg/m² plus carboplatin AUC 6.0 on day 1 (PC). Stratification was based on disease stage, baseline weight loss, and presence or absence of brain metastases. Cycles were repeated every 21 days for up to six cycles or disease progression.ResultsMedian survival (months) with GC was 7.9 compared with 8.5 for GP and 8.7 for PC. Response rates (RRs) were as follows: GC, 25.3%; GP, 32.1%; and PC, 29.8%. The GC arm was associated with a greater incidence of grade 3 or 4 hematologic events but a lower rate of neurotoxicity and alopecia when compared with GP and PC.ConclusionsNon-platinum and non-paclitaxel gemcitabine-containing doublets demonstrate similar overall survival and RR compared with the standard PC regimen. However, the treatment arms had distinct toxicity profiles.     

Phase I study of TLR9 agonist PF-3512676 in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

This phase I, open-label study investigated the Toll-like receptor 9 agonist, PF-3512676, in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in Japanese patients with advanced, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients ( n =  12) with treatment-naive stage IIIB or IV NSCLC received single-agent PF-3512676 subcutaneously once during the first 7 days (monotherapy phase) in three escalating dose levels (0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 mg/kg) followed by a combination phase during which patients received 0.1 or 0.2 mg/kg PF-3512676 subcutaneously on days 8 and 15 of each 3-week cycle of carboplatin (area under the curve, 6 mg × min/mL) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m²). Safety and pharmacokinetics of PF-3512676 were assessed during monotherapy and combination therapy phases. PF-3512676 was tolerable as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC. Most common treatment-related, non-hematologic adverse events (AEs) throughout the study were injection-site reactions ( n =  12, 100%) and flu-like symptoms ( n =  11, 91.7%) that were each grade 1 or 2 in all but one patient. All patients experienced neutropenia and leukopenia (≥grade 3 in 11 [91.7%] and seven [58.3%] patients, respectively). One patient in dose level 2 had a dose-limiting toxicity: grade 3 rash and grade 3 increase in γ-glutamyltransferase during combination therapy. Mean PF-3512676 half-life ranged from 4.8 to 21.6 h (longer with higher doses). Four (33%) patients had objective responses (one complete response, three partial responses), and seven (58%) patients achieved stable disease. PF-3512676 as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy had an acceptable safety profile in Japanese patients with treatment-naive NSCLC. ( Cancer Sci 2009)     

Phase I combination trial of gemcitabine,paclitaxel, and carboplatin in patients with advanced malignancy

PURPOSE. We performed a phase I trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel in combination with gemcitabine in order to determine the tolerability of this triplet. METHODS. Enrolled in the study were 26 patients with advanced cancer, most with non-small cell lung cancer. The patients received escalating doses of carboplatin and paclitaxel on day 1 and gemcitabine (30-min infusion) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day treatment cycle. The doses of each drug ranged from an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 5 to 6 for carboplatin, 135 to 175 mg/m(2) for paclitaxel, and 300 to 1000 mg/m(2) for gemcitabine. RESULTS. Hematologic toxicity was the most commonly observed toxicity and was dose-limiting. During the first cycle at the recommended phase II dose, there were two instances of grade 4 neutropenia and one instance of grade 4 thrombocytopenia among six patients, none of which was dose-limiting. Cumulative hematologic toxicity emerged in subsequent cycles. Non-hematologic toxicities were mild. Five patients, all with previously untreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), had a partial response. Nine patients with NSCLC or upper gastrointestinal malignancies experienced stable disease. CONCLUSIONS. Based on significant neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, the regimen recommended for further study consists of carboplatin AUC 5, paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2), and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on a 28-day cycle. The antitumor activity noted suggests that further investigation of this well-tolerated combination in specific tumor types, especially NSCLC, is warranted.     

Phase II trial of paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Given the cisplatin-related myelotoxicity and nonhematologic toxicities, we were prompted to undertake a study of the noncisplatin combination of paclitaxel plus gemcitabine to evaluate the efficacy, tolerance, and survival of this combination in patients with locally advanced and metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received gemcitabine 2,000 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 150 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, for a maximum of eight cycles. RESULTS: Between December 1997 and June 1998, 89 untreated NSCLC patients were enrolled; 30 (34%) had stage IIIB disease (23 with malignant pleural effusion and seven without), and 59 (66%) had stage IV disease. Eighty-six percent of patients had a performance status of 0 or 1. The median number of cycles administered was four (range, one to eight cycles). The mean dose-intensity for both paclitaxel and gemcitabine was nearly 100%. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were mild. Thirty-eight patients received second-line chemotherapy after completion of the study. The overall intent-to-treat response rate was 32.2%, with a higher response rate for stage IIIB patients (43.3%) than for stage IV patients (26.3%). Overall median survival was 9.9 months, and 1-year survival was 38.8% (14.2 months for stage IIIB and 7.7 months for stage IV; P =.007). Median survival was 10.2 months for patients with a performance status of 0 or 1 and 4.8 months for patients with a performance status of 2 (P =.007). CONCLUSION: A biweekly paclitaxel/gemcitabine regimen was well tolerated, with an acceptable response rate and a reasonable median survival time, especially in patients with good performance status. It merits further exploration in future studies.     

Phase III randomised trial comparing paclitaxel/carboplatin with paclitaxel/cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a cooperative multinational trial.

BACKGROUND: The combination of paclitaxel with cisplatin or carboplatin has significant activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase III study of chemotherapy-na?ve advanced NSCLC patients was designed to assess whether response rate in patients receiving a paclitaxel/carboplatin combination was similar to that in patients receiving a paclitaxel/cisplatin combination. Paclitaxel was given at a dose of 200 mg/m(2) (3-h intravenous infusion) followed by either carboplatin at an AUC of 6 or cisplatin at a dose of 80 mg/m(2), all repeated every 3 weeks. Survival, toxicity and quality of life were also compared. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomised to receive one of the two combinations, stratified according to centre, performance status, disease stage and histology. The primary analyses of response rate and survival were carried out on response-evaluable patients. Survival was also analysed for all randomised patients. Toxicity analyses were carried out on all treated patients. RESULTS: A total of 618 patients were randomised. The two treatment arms were well balanced with regard to gender (83% male), age (median 58 years), performance status (83% ECOG 0-1), stage (68% IV, 32% IIIB) and histology (38% squamous cell carcinoma). In the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm, 306 patients received a total of 1311 courses (median four courses, range 1-10 courses) while in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm, 302 patients received a total of 1321 courses (median four courses, range 1-10 courses). In only 76% of courses, carboplatin was administered as planned at an AUC of 6, while in 96% of courses, cisplatin was given at the planned dose of 80 mg/m(2). The response rate was 25% (70 of 279) in the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm and 28% (80 of 284) in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm (P = 0.45). Responses were reviewed by an independent radiological committee. For all randomised patients, median survival was 8.5 months in the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm and 9.8 months in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm [hazard ratio 1.20, 90% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.40]; the 1-year survival rates were 33% and 38%, respectively. On the same dataset, a survival update after 22 months of additional follow-up yielded a median survival of 8.2 months in the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm and 9.8 months in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm (hazard ratio 1.22, 90% CI 1.06-1.40; P = 0.019); the 2-year survival rates were 9% and 15%, respectively. Excluding neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, which were more frequent in the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm, and nausea/vomiting and nephrotoxicity, which were more frequent in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm, the rate of severe toxicities was generally low and comparable between the two arms. Overall quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC-13) was also similar between the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first trial comparing carboplatin and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Although paclitaxel/carboplatin yielded a similar response rate, the significantly longer median survival obtained with paclitaxel/cisplatin indicates that cisplatin-based chemotherapy should be the first treatment option.     

Phase I/II investigation of paclitaxel, ifosfamide and carboplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and tolerability of the three-drug combination of paclitaxel, ifosfamide and carboplatin (TIC) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The specific objectives of the study were: (i) to define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum-tolerated dose of ifosfamide administered as part of the combination; and (ii) to determine the overall response rate and overall survival of patients treated with this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with untreated, stage IIIB (pleural effusion) or stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer were enrolled in one of three cohorts. Patients received paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) as a 1-h infusion on day 1 with carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 6 mg.min/ml on day 2. For dose level I, ifosfamide was administered at a dose of 2 g/m(2) on days 1 and 2. For dose levels II and III, the dose of ifosfamide was decreased to 1.5 g/m(2) on days 1 and 2 and the dose of carboplatin was decreased to AUC 5 mg.ml/min. Therapy for dose levels I and III included filgrastim support (5 micro g/kg/day), which was initiated on day 3 and continued until after day 11 or until an absolute neutrophil count >10 000/ micro l. Treatment cycles were repeated every 21 days. Once the phase II dose was established, a full cohort of patients received therapy at this dose level to examine further the regimen's activity and tolerability. RESULTS: Neutropenia was the DLT encountered for dose levels I and II. No DLT was encountered in the initial six patients treated at dose level III, and therefore this dose level was declared the recommended phase II dose. A total of 49 patients were treated at the recommended phase II dose. The predominant non-hematological toxicity encountered with this triplet regimen was cumulative peripheral neuropathy. Of the 65 eligible patients enrolled in this study, 17 (26%) responded. There were 15 patients with partial responses (23%), two with regression, and 26 with stabilization of disease (40%). Median progression-free and overall survival were 4.8 and 9.4 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination TIC is well-tolerated. This triplet regimen produced response and survival rates in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer similar to those of other current combination chemotherapy regimens.     

Drug distribution and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship of paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

Background:Gemcitabine and paclitaxel are two of the mostactive agents in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and pharmacologicinvestigation of the combination regimens including these drugs mayoffer a valuable opportunity in treatment optimization. The presentstudy investigates the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics ofpaclitaxel and gemcitabine in chemotherapy-naive patients with advancedNSCLC within a phase I study. Patients and methods:Patients were given i.v. paclitaxel 100 mg/m² byone-hour infusion followed by gemcitabine 1500, 1750 and 2000mg/m² by 30-min administration. Plasma levels of paclitaxel,gemcitabine and its metabolite 2,2-difluorodeoxyuridine(dFdU) were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).Concentration-time curves were modeled by compartmental andnon-compartmental methods and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD)relationships were fitted according to a sigmoid maximum effect(E_max) model. Results:Paclitaxelpharmacokinetics did not change as a result of dosage escalation ofgemcitabine from 1500 to 2000 mg/m². A nonproportionalincrease in gemcitabine peak plasma levels (C_max, from 18.56± 4.94 to 40.85 ± 14.85 µg/ml) and area under theplasma concentration-time curve (AUC, from 9.99 ± 2.75 to 25.01± 9.87 h·µg/ml) at 1500 and 2000mg/m², respectively, was observed, suggesting the occurrenceof saturation kinetics at higher doses. A significant relationshipbetween neutropenia and time of paclitaxel plasma levels 0.05µmol/l was observed, with a predicted time of 10.4 h to decreasecell count by 50%. A correlation was also observed betweenpercentage reduction of platelet count and gemcitabine C_max,with a predicted effective concentration to induce a 50% decreaseof 14.3 µg/ml. Conclusion:This study demonstratesthe lack of interaction between drugs, the nonproportionalpharmacokinetics of gemcitabine at higher doses and the E_maxrelationship of paclitaxel and gemcitabine with neutrophil and plateletcounts, respectively. In addition, gemcitabine 1500 mg/m² isthe recommended dosage in combination with paclitaxel 100mg/m² for future phase II studies, due to its predictablekinetic behaviour and less severe thrombocytopenia than expected.     

Phase II trial of a paclitaxel and carboplatin combination in Asian patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Purpose: An earlier phase II trial of paclitaxel in patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) demonstrated a response rate of 22%. Hence we proceeded to study the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin in these patients.Patients and methods: The 21-day regimen was as follows: i.v. paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over three hours preceded by standard premedications, followed by i.v. carboplatin dosed at AUC of six infused over one hour. Only chemotherapy-naïve patients with histological diagnoses of undifferentiated carcinoma of the nasopharynx, systemic metastases and radiologically measurable lesions were eligible.Results: Thirty-two patients were accrued to this study. Twenty patients (62%) had at least two sites of metastasis. The main grade 3–4 toxicity was neutropenia (31%). Nine patients (28%) developed neutropenic sepsis, which caused the demise of one of them. Twenty-four patients (75%) responded to treatment, with one (3%) attaining a complete response. The median time to progression of disease was seven months and the median survival was 12 months. At one year, 52% of the patients were alive.Conclusions: The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin is an active regimen in NPC. Its convenience of administration and good tolerability make it an attractive alternative regimen to consider for patients with metastatic disease.     

Clinical trial and pharmacokinetic study of combination paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the recommended dose of paclitaxel in chemotherapy used in combination with carboplatin, and to examine the pharmacokinetic parameters of paclitaxel and carboplatin in Japanese patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS:The study group comprised 18 patients (median age 53 years, range 30-67 years) who received a total of 28 courses of first-line chemotherapy. The paclitaxel levels were set at 150 mg/m(2) ( n=5), 175 mg/m(2) ( n=6) and 200 mg/m(2) ( n=7), with the fixed dose of carboplatin at AUC 5. The plasma concentrations of paclitaxel in 28 courses and platinum in 23 courses were measured to determine the in vivo pharmacokinetics parameters. RESULTS: The nadir of neutrophils in the paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) group was significantly lower ( P<0.05) than in the 150 and 175 mg/m(2) groups. Of seven patients in the paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) group, one had grade 3 myalgia, another grade 3 neuropathy, and two grade 4 neutropenia. Paclitaxel AUC and the peak level tended to be dose-dependent, clearly indicating a two-phase disappearance. Further, the paclitaxel dosage and paclitaxel AUC were also dose-dependent. Using a limited sampling protocol for carboplatin, the carboplatin AUC was found to change little in relation to the paclitaxel dosage. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this clinical trial and pharmacokinetic study, 175 mg/m(2) of paclitaxel as a 3-h infusion in combination with carboplatin AUC 5 can be considered as the recommended dose for Japanese ovarian cancer patients.     

Randomized phase II trial comparing bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel with carboplatin and paclitaxel alone in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced or recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a phase II trial, 99 patients were randomly assigned to bevacizumab 7.5 (n = 32) or 15 mg/kg (n = 35) plus carboplatin (area under the curve = 6) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks or carboplatin and paclitaxel alone (n = 32). Primary efficacy end points were time to disease progression and best confirmed response rate. On disease progression, patients in the control arm had the option to receive single-agent bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Compared with the control arm, treatment with carboplatin and paclitaxel plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) resulted in a higher response rate (31.5% v 18.8%), longer median time to progression (7.4 v 4.2 months) and a modest increase in survival (17.7 v 14.9 months). Of the 19 control patients that crossed over to single-agent bevacizumab, five experienced stable disease, and 1-year survival was 47%. Bleeding was the most prominent adverse event and was manifested in two distinct clinical patterns; minor mucocutaneous hemorrhage and major hemoptysis. Major hemoptysis was associated with squamous cell histology, tumor necrosis and cavitation, and disease location close to major blood vessels. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel improved overall response and time to progression in patients with advanced or recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer. Patients with nonsquamous cell histology appear to be a subpopulation with improved outcome and acceptable safety risks.     

Phase II randomized trial of vinorelbine and gemcitabine versus carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare quality of life and overall toxicity in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with vinorelbine-gemcitabine (VG) or carboplatin-paclitaxel (Taxol) (CP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 165 previously untreated patients were randomized to the two regimens. Quality of life was assessed by the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS). Overall toxicity and secondary efficacy end points were evaluated by standard WHO criteria. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in overall quality of life between the two treatments. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, peripheral neuropathy, and alopecia, were more common in the CP arm, whereas constipation was more frequent in the VG arm. Response rates were 14.6% in the VG arm and 16.9% in the CP arm. Median survival times were 7.8 and 8.6 months, and 1 year survival rates were 38.4% and 31.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with VG experienced lower toxicity, but overall quality of life was similar in both arms. Efficacy seemed comparable between VG and CP. Our study shows that VG is a viable alternative to platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose, toxicity profile, and pharmacokinetics of a fixed dose of paclitaxel followed by increasing doses of carboplatin, given weekly to patients with advanced esophageal or gastric junction cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Paclitaxel was administered on day 1 as a 1-h infusion at a fixed dose of 100 mg/m(2) followed by a 1-h infusion of carboplatin targeting an area under the curve (AUC) of 2-5 mg x min/ml, with cycles repeated on days 8, 15, 29, 36, and 43. RESULTS: Forty patients [36 males; median (range) age, 57 (40-74) years] were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicity was observed at a carboplatin AUC of 5 mg x min/ml and consisted of treatment delay attributable to myelosuppression. No grade 3/4 treatment-related nonhematological toxicity was observed. The highest dose intensity (>95% of the planned dose over time) was achieved with a carboplatin AUC of 4 mg x min/ml. The mean (+/-SD) AUCs of unbound (Cu) and total paclitaxel were 0.662 +/- 0.186 and 7.37 +/- 1.33 micro M x h, respectively. Clearance of Cu was 188 +/- 44.6 liter/h/m(2), which is not significantly different from historical data (P = 0.52). Cremophor EL clearance was 123 +/- 23 ml/h/m(2), similar to previous findings. Of 37 patients evaluable for response, 1 had complete response, 19 had partial response, and 10 had stable disease, accounting for an overall response rate of 54%. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen is very tolerable and effective, and the recommended doses for additional studies are paclitaxel (100 mg/m(2)), with carboplatin targeting an AUC of 4 mg x min/ml.     

Phase II trial of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and concurrent radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

We conducted a phase II trial to investigate the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiation in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thirty patients with inoperable NSCLC were enrolled onto a multicenter phase II trial of concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Patients received six weekly cycles of paclitaxel 45 mg/m(2) over 1 h; carboplatin at (area under the curve) AUC 2; and radiation therapy of 60 Gy. Radiation was administered to the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes (40 Gy over 4 weeks) followed by a boost to the primary tumor (20 Gy in 2 weeks). After the initial phase of concurrent chemoradiation, patients received an additional four cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) over 3 h and carboplatin at AUC 6 every 3 weeks. The overall objective response rate of 30 assessable patients was 76.7%. At the median follow-up time of 13.1 months, the median survival time was 14.5 months (95% CI, 10.59-18.48). The median progression-free survival was 10.5 months (95% CI, 7.72-13.28). The major toxicity was hematologic. The incidence of grade 3 esophagitis was 10%. In conclusion, this chemoradiation regimen is well tolerated and shows significant clinical results for locally advanced NSCLC. Locoregional failure rate remains an important issue with this newer chemotherapeutic regimen. A novel chemotherapy and radiation therapy is clearly needed.     

Phase I/II trial of docetaxel and carboplatin in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Background. This trial was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and principal toxicities of combinations of docetaxel and carboplatin administered every 3 weeks to patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously untreated with chemotherapy, and to find suitable doses for phase II studies in Japanese subjects. Methods. Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC and performance status 0 to 2 according to the World Health Organization classification, but previously untreated with chemotherapy received docetaxel followed by carboplatin, each infused over a 1-h period. The carboplatin dose was based on the target area under the curve (AUC), using Calvert's formula. Dose levels studied were: docetaxel (mg/m²)/carboplatin AUC (mg/ml·min), 50/4, 60/4, and 60/5, repeated every 3 weeks. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) support was first used when dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were encountered. Results. Of 14 patients entered, 12 were assessable for toxicity and response. The MTD schedule was: docetaxel, 60 mg/m², with carboplatin, AUC 5 mg/ml·min (DLTs in 3 of 3 patients). The recommended dosage was: docetaxel, 60 mg/m², with carboplatin, AUC 4 mg/ml·min (DLTs in 2 of 6 patients). The main toxic effect was neutropenia, and any nonhematologic toxic effects were mild. No thrombocytopenia occurred. Six of the 12 patients (50%) showed responses; 4 of the 6 at the recommended doses. Conclusion. Docetaxel 60 mg/m², given over a 1-h period, followed by carboplatin, AUC 4 mg/ml·min, given over a 1-h period, is recommended for phase II studies in Japan. This combined chemotherapy has mild toxicity, except for neutropenia, and is useful and easy to administer. We therefore believe that phase II and phase III studies of this therapy would be well justified. Received: October 4, 1999 / Accepted: June 28, 2000     

Phase I, pharmacokinetic, and biological study of erlotinib in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of administering erlotinib, an inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase, in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin, and to identify pharmacokinetic interactions, evaluate downstream effects of EGFR inhibition on surrogate tissues, and seek preliminary evidence for clinical activity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated continuously with erlotinib at doses of 100, 125, and 150 mg/d orally along with fixed i.v. doses of paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 6 mg x min/mL, both on day 1 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty evaluable patients were treated with 136 courses of erlotinib, paclitaxel, and carboplatin. Myelosuppression, skin rash, and diarrhea were the principal toxicities. Dose limiting diarrhea occurred in 1 of 6 patients at the 100 mg erlotinib dose level, whereas 0 of 9 evaluable patients at the 125 mg erlotinib dose level experienced dose limiting toxicity and 3 of 5 evaluable patients at 150 mg erlotinib experienced dose limiting skin rash and neutropenic sepsis. There was no evidence of pharmacokinetic interactions between paclitaxel and erlotinib; however, total carboplatin exposure trended higher in the presence of erlotinib. No consistent downstream effects on EGFR inhibition were found in skin. Durable objective responses were observed in non-small-cell lung and head and neck cancers. CONCLUSIONS: A dose level of erlotinib 125 mg combined with paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 6 mg.min/mL is recommended for disease-directed studies. This phase I trial was followed by a randomized phase III study in non-small-cell lung cancer using a similar regimen.     

Phase II study of paclitaxel and carboplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

A prospective phase II study was conducted to determine the response, toxicity and survival rate of lung cancer patients treated with combination paclitaxel and carboplatin in stage IIIB and IV NSCLC. Eligible patients required measurable and/or evaluable diseases; performance status (ECOG) 0-2; no previous chemotherapy; adequate hepatic, renal and bone marrow function. Paclitaxel was administered at a dose of 200 mg/m2, 3 h infusion, followed by carboplatin at an AUC of 6. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for six courses. G-CSF 5 microgram/kg was subcutaneously injected during subsequent courses if there was grade 3-4 leucopenia or granulocytopenia in the previous course. From April 1996 through July 1997, 53 patients were enrolled; all are assessable for toxicity and response. The median age was 56 years (range, 20-77 years). Sixty four percent were male, 64% had adenocarcinoma and 62% had stage IV disease. Two hundred and seventy two courses were administered; 36 patients (68%) completed all six cycles. Two patients achieved a complete response (4%) and 27 patients achieved a partial response (51%), for an overall response rate of 55%. Sixteen patients had stable disease (30%) and 8 patients had progressive disease (15%). The median progression free survival time for all patients, stage IIIB and stage IV patients was 28 weeks (range, 18-37 weeks), 31 weeks (range 21-41 weeks) and 22 weeks (range 16-29 weeks), respectively. The median survival time and 1 year survival rate for all patients was 55 weeks (range, 51-59 weeks) and 55%, respectively. Stage IIIB patients had better median survival time and 1-year survival rate than stage IV patients (75 vs. 46 weeks, P = 0.007; 80% vs. 42%, P = 0.003). Grade 3 and 4 granulocytopenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 25, 3, and 1%, respectively, of the 272 courses administered. G-CSF was required in 28% of the 272 courses. There were four episodes of febrile neutropenia (1.5%), three episodes of angina pectoris (1%) and one episode of anaphylaxis (0.4%). Other common toxicities, generally mild, included myalgia, arthralgia, peripheral neuropathy and asthenia. Most toxicities showed cumulative effect. Paclitaxel plus carboplatin is a moderately active regimen in advanced NSCLC. Toxicities of this regimen are well tolerated.