Trough Levels of Everolimus Are Associated With Recurrence Rates of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation

Purpose

Everolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, may have a protective role on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT), but data regarding the impact of its trough serum levels on HCC recurrence are missing.

Value of Imaging Findings in the Prediction of Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to determine the utility of some imaging findings in predicting microvascular invasion (MVI) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence risk after liver transplantation.MethodThis retrospective study included 123 patients with histopathologically proven HCC at explant. All HCCs were classified as MVI positive (group I) or negative (group II) based on histopathological findings. In each group, multifocality, largest tumor size, bulging (tumor causing liver capsule expansion), beak sign (the acute angle between the tumor and liver parenchyma), and diffusion restriction on diffusion weighted images (DWI) were evaluated. These findings were compared between the groups by Student’s t test. The relation between the parameters and MVI was analyzed by using the Spearman’s correlation test.ResultsOf the total patients, 30.1% had MVI (group I) and 69.9% (group II) did not have MVI. Presence of beak sign (P ≤ .005), bulging sign (P = .002), and diffusion restriction (P = .045) were significantly more frequent in group I than group II. The beak sign, bulging sign, and diffusion restriction were correlated with presence of MVI. Largest tumor size and multifocality were higher in group I than group II, but the differences were not statistically significant.ConclusionRadiologists and transplant surgeons should be aware of some clue imaging findings, especially beak and bulging signs because these findings may predict the presence of MVI in HCC. These patients might benefit from histologic confirmation of the tumor characteristics through biopsy and subsequent bridging treatment options before liver transplantation to reduce the risk of recurrence.     

Preoperative Alpha-Fetoprotein and Radiological Total Tumor Diameter as Predictors of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Liver Transplantation

BackgroundLiver transplantation is a unique treatment opportunity for patients with chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Selection of HCC patients for transplantation was revolutionized by Milan-based criteria, but tumor recurrence and shortage of organs are still a major concern. Nowadays, additional preoperative tumor parameters can help to refine the graft allocation process. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value and cut-off points of pretransplant serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels and radiological tumor parameters on liver transplantation outcomes.MethodsThis is a single-team retrospective cohort of 162 consecutive deceased donor liver transplants (DDLT) with pathologically confirmed HCC. Pretransplant serum AFP levels and radiological tumor parameters were retrieved from a preoperative follow-up. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to evaluate cut-off points for each outcome. Multivariate Cox regression model was used to assess the predictors of HCC relapse and recipient mortality.ResultsTwelve recipients (7.4%) had HCC recurrence after transplantation, with median survival time of 5.8 months. Pretransplant AFP ≥30 ng/mL (hazard ratio [HR]: 13.84, P = .003) and radiological total tumor diameter (TTD) ≥5 cm (HR: 12.89, P = .005) were independent predictors for HCC relapse. Moreover, pretransplant AFP ≥150 ng/mL was independently associated with recipient mortality (HR: 4.45, P = .003).ConclusionsPretransplant AFP levels and radiological TTD were independently associated with HCC relapse and recipient mortality after DDLT, with different cut-off points predicting different outcomes. These findings may contribute to improving decision-making in the context of liver transplantation for HCC patients.     

Antifungal Prophylaxis and Treatment Among Lung Transplant Recipients in Early Postoperative Stage: A Single-Center Study

BackgroundLung transplantation remains the only feasible option for certain patients with end-stage lung disease. Lifelong immunosuppression increases the risk of infection, including fungal infections. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of antifungal prophylaxis and treatment among lung transplant recipients in the early postoperative stage.MethodsThis retrospective analysis included 127 patients who underwent lung transplantation between 2014 and 2021 in the lung transplant ward, 65.35% of whom were males. The most common indication for lung transplantation was cystic fibrosis (n = 59; 46.46%). All of the patients were receiving inhaled amphotericin B. Within this group there were patients who also were treated with intravenous caspofungin, intravenous/oral voriconazole, or both.ResultsThe difference in the efficacy against Candida spp. between caspofungin and voriconazole in the early post-transplant period was not statistically significant (χ₂ = 0.5, P = .477). Moreover, the difference in the efficacy against Candida spp. between itraconazole and voriconazole during the first post-transplant year was not statistically significant (χ₂ = 0.46, P = .496).ConclusionCaspofungin and voriconazole are proper and relatively efficient antifungal prophylaxis and treatment options after lung transplantation. There was no significant difference between voriconazole and caspofungin as antifungal agents used in the early post-transplant stage. There was no significant difference between voriconazole and itraconazole as antifungal agents used during the first post-transplant year. Further research on this issue is required.     

Incidence of donor‐specific antibodies in kidney transplant patients following conversion to an everolimus‐based calcineurin inhibitor‐free regimen

Scarce data exist regarding the incidence of donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs) in kidney transplant patients receiving everolimus‐based immunosuppression without calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). The aim of this retrospective case–control study was to compare the incidence of de novo DSAs in patients converted to an everolimus‐based regimen without CNIs with that seen in patients maintained on CNIs. Sixty‐one DSA‐free kidney transplant patients who had been converted to an everolimus‐based regimen (everolimus group) were compared to 61 other patients maintained on CNIs‐based regimen (control group). Patients were matched according to age, gender, induction therapy, date of transplantation, and being DSA‐free at baseline. At last follow‐up, the incidence of DSAs was 9.8% in the everolimus group and 5% in the control group (p = ns). In the everolimus group, the increased incidence of DSAs between baseline and last follow‐up was statistically significant. Antibody‐mediated rejection occurred in 6.5% in the everolimus group and 0% in the CNIs group. The incidence of DSAs is numerically increased in kidney transplant patients treated with an everolimus‐based without CNIs. A study including a larger number of patients is required to determine whether a CNI‐free everolimus‐based immunosuppression significantly increases DSAs formation.     

Various Aspects of Bacterial Infections in the Early Postoperative Stage Among Lung Transplant Recipients on Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics: A Single Center Study

BackgroundLife-long immunosuppression after lung transplantation increases the risk of bacterial infections, hence broad-spectrum antibiotics can be implemented after transplant. The aim of this study is to assess various aspects of bacterial infections in the early postoperative stage among lung transplant recipients on broad-spectrum antibiotics at a single center.MethodsThis retrospective study consists of 134 primary lung transplant recipients transplanted between 2014 and 2021 at a single center. Study analyzed the occurrence of de novo bacterium in bronchoalveolar lavage sampled 2 to3 weeks after lung transplantation, as well as survival and the occurrence of bacterial sepsis. Studied antibiotics include linezolid, meropenem, tobramycin, and cloxacillin.ResultsNone of the patients from the broad-spectrum antibiotics developed bacterial sepsis within the first 30 postoperative days. In-hospital mortality due to bacterial sepsis among patients in the broad-spectrum group was 1.89%. The most common new pathogen in first couple of days after lung transplantation was Burkholderia multivorans (42%). After its occurrence, Ceftazidime was administered. It significantly reduced the occurrence of hospital-acquired B multivorans after 2 to 3 weeks post-transplant (χ² = 8.01, P = .005).ConclusionBroad-spectrum antibiotics seem to be an efficient approach against bacterial infections for lung transplant recipients in the early post-transplant period, as patients treated this way very rarely develop fatal bacterial infections in the studied period. Ceftazidime proved efficient for treatment for B multivorans among the studied group. Patients, who acquired new pathogen during post-transplant hospital stay presented comparable lung function at discharge in comparison to those who were not.     

High levels of soluble Major Histocompatibility Complex class I related chain A (MICA) are associated with biliary cast syndrome after liver transplantation

BackgroundThe biliary cast syndrome (BCS) is a frequent problem following liver transplantation. The pathogenesis of this complication is not well understood. Previous research has demonstrated that the soluble form of MICA (sMICA) is significantly higher in patients with chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) than in healthy volunteers. The aim of this study is to investigate the possible involvement of sMICA in the formation of BCS after liver transplantation.MethodsSerum soluble MICA was retrospectively evaluated in pre- and post-transplant sera from 133 consecutive primary liver transplant patients and in sera from 88 healthy volunteers using sandwich ELISA. Normal distribution of serum sMICA was described by the data obtained from healthy population and sMICA concentration that was greater than the upper bound 95% normal range was considered as high levels of sMICA. Patient records were reviewed to identify patients who developed BCS.ResultsThe results demonstrated that 37.6% of patients with end-stage liver diseases had significantly higher pre-transplant serum sMICA than in healthy population. 34.4% of recipients with post-transplant high levels of sMICA developed BCS. In contrast, 17.3% of patients with post-transplant normal levels of sMICA developed BCS. The risk of BCS development is significantly associated with the presence of post-transplant high levels of sMICA (P = 0.0365). Further analysis disclosed that patients with decreased post-transplant sMICA following liver transplantation had a lower incidence rate of BCS than those with remained high levels of sMICA after transplantation (10.5% vs. 38.7%, P = 0.0302). Furthermore, log-rank test showed that BCS occurrence was significantly associated with dynamic changes of sMICA among different groups (P = 0.0188).ConclusionsBiliary cast syndrome is more likely to develop in recipients who have post-transplant high levels of sMICA. The data suggested that sMICA might have some immunologic effect on BCS development following liver transplant. Monitoring of serum sMICA could have a prognostic value in assessment of patients with liver transplantation.     

Edema Associated With Everolimus de Novo

BackgroundThe appearance of edema limits the use of everolimus de novo together with tacrolimus and steroids in kidney transplantation. We aimed to investigate the frequency and characteristics of patients with edema and compare them according to the type of immunosuppression.MethodsWe studied 150 kidney transplant recipients between 2015 and 2017 based on receiving everolimus de novo (group A) or mycophenolic acid derivatives (group B).ResultsWe analyzed 50 patients in group A and 100 in group B. Follow-up was 26.2 ± 10 months. Fifty-six patients presented edema (37.3%): 54% in group A and 29% in group B (P = .003). Edema was mild in 74% of patients in group A and 57.1% in group B. The probability of edema was 10.1%, 22.4%, and 41% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively, in group A vs 10.1%, 20.3%, and 25.4% in group B (P = .006). Patients were treated mostly with diuretics (14.3% in group A vs 27.6% in group B) and discontinuation of calcium channel blockers (46.4% in group A vs 48.3% in group B). Improvement was 70.4% in group A vs 60.7% in group B; patient worsening was 0% in group A vs 10.7% in group B; and there was no change in 29.6% in group A vs 28.6% in group B. We did not find differences in patient or graft survival in those who presented edema, regardless of the treatment group.ConclusionThe use of everolimus and standard doses of tacrolimus caused edema in 54% of patients, with no impact on renal function or survival compared with mycophenolic acid derivatives. The edema was mostly of low intensity and improved in most patients.     

Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors are associated with lower rates of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation: a systematic review

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) have been associated in a dose‐dependent fashion with an increased risk of post‐transplant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence. The mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) (sirolimus/everolimus) might represent an alternative immunosuppressive regimen with antineoplastic effect. In the present systematic review, the association between mTORi and HCC recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) was evaluated and compared against that of CNIs‐treated patients. In total, 3666 HCC liver transplant recipients from 42 studies met the inclusion criteria. Patients under CNIs developed HCC recurrence significantly more frequently, compared with patients under mTORi (448/3227 or 13.8% vs. 35/439 or 8%, P < 0.001), although patients treated with CNIs had a higher proportion of HCC within Milan criteria (74% vs. 69%) and lower rates of microvascular invasion, compared with mTORi‐treated patients (22% vs. 44%) (P < 0.05). Patients on everolimus had significantly lower recurrence rates of HCC, compared with those on sirolimus or CNIs (4.1% vs. 10.5% vs. 13.8%, respectively, P < 0.05), but everolimus‐treated recipients had shorter follow‐up period (13 vs. 30 vs. 43.2 months, respectively) and more frequently been transplanted for HCC within Milan criteria (84% vs. 60.5% vs. 74%, respectively, P < 0.05). Our findings favor the use of mTORi instead of CNIs to control HCC recurrence after LT, but comparative studies with longer follow‐up are needed for final conclusions.     

肝细胞癌肝移植术后复发和转移的研究:单中心经验

目的 研究肝细胞癌肝移植术后复发和转移的临床特点及治疗方法.方法 回顾分析2003年1月至2005年11月收治的95例肝细胞癌肝移植术后肝癌复发转移病例的临床资料.结果 在随访期内,42例(43.2%)患者被诊断为肝癌复发.复发部位最多见于移植肝(32例)、肺(21例)、骨(7例).单因素分析结果显示,肿瘤大小、肿瘤分布、肝硬化背景、术前甲胎蛋白浓度、组织学分期、大血管侵犯6项因素对肝移植术后生存和(或)肝癌复发有明显影响.多因素分析结果显示,肿瘤分布、组织学分期、大血管侵犯是影响术后总体生存率和肝癌复发率的独立危险因素.肝癌复发后的介入治疗及内放疗可延缓肿瘤进展,选择合适病例行复发灶手术切除可最大限度地改善预后.结论 合理选择接受肝移植的肝癌患者可能可以大幅度降低移植术后肝癌的复发率.在现阶段,外科治疗应是目前移植术后复发性肝癌的首选治疗手段.     

Optimizing Survival for Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Report and Current Perspectives

BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the leading primary liver tumor and a main indication for transplant. Transplant criteria are based on clinicopathologic features, meanwhile adequate downstaging and molecular mechanisms are getting more attention in evolving therapeutic algorithm of HCC. The aim of our study was to overview the results of the Hungarian Liver Transplant Program in the field of HCC and introduce new aspects of personalized treatment options.MethodsWe performed retrospective analysis of survival and tumor recurrence of HCC-associated liver transplant recipients between October 2013 and December 2020. Patients were categorized in Milan criteria (MC), beyond MC but within University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), and beyond UCSF criteria groups after pathologic examination of the explanted liver. Demographic data and preoperative locoregional treatments were assessed.ResultsA total of 529 primer liver transplants were performed, 88 because of HCC. A total of 87 patients had underlying cirrhosis because of hepatitis C (54%), alcohol-related liver disease (33.7%), hepatitis B (4.5%), or unknown etiology. A total of 55.6% of the patients had at least one locoregional treatment. A total of 67.4% of the patients were within MC, 5.6% were within UCSF criteria, and 27% were beyond UCSF criteria.The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 80%, 79%, and 75%. The outcome was better in early-stage tumors, but the difference was not significant (P = .745)ConclusionsThe favorable survival in our department legitimates the strict transplant criteria of HCC. Adequate locoregional therapy as downstaging can expand recipient pool. Molecular tumor profiling may lead to personalized treatment of HCC.     

Long-term Survival Outcomes for Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients With Pathologically Nonviable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

Complete necrosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesions has occasionally been found by explant pathology after pretransplant neoadjuvant treatment. This study sought to investigate the long-term prognostic effect of loss of tumor viability after HCC treatment in living donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients.

Methods

We reviewed retrospectively the 5-year records of 37 patients who demonstrated nonviable HCC on explant pathology.

Results

The most common primary disease was hepatitis-B-virus-associated liver cirrhosis (n = 34). Single explant tumors were found in 29 patients; the mean maximal tumor size was 2.1 ± 0.9 cm (range: 0.8–4.0). No patients showed microvascular invasion. The median level of alpha-fetoprotein was 12 ng/mL (range: 1–1160). The 1 patient who showed a recurrence at 20 months remains alive more than 6 years after adrenalectomy and repeated pulmonary metastasectomy. The 5-year HCC recurrence rate was thus 2.1%. There were 2 late mortalities, each due to graft failure and recurrent gastric cancer. The overall patient survival rate was 97.3% at 5 and 92.7% at 10 years.

Conclusions

The results of this study revealed that the loss of tumor viability induced by pretransplant neoadjuvant treatment definitely decreased the risk of post-transplant HCC recurrence. Therefore, patients with nonviable HCC can be regarded as members of a superselect group with minimal risk for HCC recurrence, and may be exempted from routine HCC screening.     

Efficacy of Tumor Markers After Liver Transplantation In Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

ObjectiveThe most reliable treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is liver transplantation (LT). Recurrence of HCC after LT is the most serious problem; therefore, early diagnosis of recurrent HCC is very important. This study investigated the efficacy of tumor markers in patients with LT for HCC.Methods and MaterialsFrom January 2008 to December 2016, 242 patients underwent LT for HCC. The operation of LT and immunosuppressive methods were the same as those of general LT patients. All patients were followed up with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and protein induced by vitamin K absence (PIVKA)-II. The 41 patients (16.9%) recurred during follow-up period.ResultsThe factors associated with recurrence were tumor markers (AFP, PIVKA-II), maximum tumor diameter, number, microvascular invasion, Milan criteria, and Edmondson–Steiner grade. In 41 patients with recurrent HCC, 14 patients (34.15%) were both elevated in 2 markers and 18 patients (43.9%) were elevated in 1 tumor marker. There was no relationship between tumor marker and recurrent site. The survival rate of patients with recurrence in 1, 3, and 5 years were 78.6%, 34.7%, and 23.7%, respectively. Curability of treatment and elevation of tumor marker before treatment were correlated with patient survival after recurrence. When the receiver operating characteristic curve was used, the area under the curve value using the sum of AFP and PIVKA-II before LT was 0.827.ConclusionsIn this study, tumor markers (AFP, PIVKA-II) for HCC were correlated with post-transplant recurrence factors and may be a useful tool for early diagnosis and to predict the prognosis after recurrence.     

Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Liver Transplantation

Management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplantation (OLT) is not well established. We conducted a retrospective analysis of our results in the treatment of HCC recurrence after OLT Patients. The 23 HCC recurrences developed after 182 OLT performed for HCC within Milan criteria, had an average follow-up of 60 months.

Results

The median time to recurrence was 23.4 months. Surgical resection of the recurrence was possible in 11 patients, but an R-0 resection was obtained in 8 patients. Four of these 8 patients developed another recurrence, with 3 succumbing due to tumor recurrence and 1 alive at 12 months with recurrence. The other 4 patients without recurrences, include 3 who are alive at 19, 31, and 86 months and 1 who died at 32.6 months due to hepatitis C recurrence. The 3 patients with palliative resections developed recurrences. Twelve patients were rejected for surgery: 8 were treated symptomatically, 2 with systemic chemotherapy, and 2 with everolimus and sorafenib. This last treatment was also prescribed for 2 patients after R-0 surgery who are alive at 19 and 31 months and for 1 patient after R-1 surgery who is alive at 19 months. Of 15 patients who died, 13 succumbed to HCC recurrence. The average survival from transplantation was 61.7 ± 37.5 and 48 ± 34.3 months for patients without and with recurrence, respectively (P < .001). The survival from the recurrence was significantly higher among patients with R-0 surgery: 32.3 ± 21.5 versus 11.9 ± 6.9 months (P = .006).

Conclusions

HCC recurrence after OLT of patients within Milan criteria was low but had a great impact on survival. Few cases are amenable to R-0 resection, but when possible it was associated with a significantly increased survival, although with an high incidence of a new recurrence. There is a rationale for the use of sorafenib and mammalian target of rapamycin based immunosuppression, which warrants randomized studies.     

Is thyroid cancer prognosis affected by solid organ transplantation?

BackgroundThyroid nodules discovered incidentally during transplant may prolong time to transplantation. Although data suggest that incidence of thyroid cancer increases after solid organ transplantation, the impact on prognosis in differentiated thyroid cancer is not well characterized.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of patients with history of thyroid cancer and solid organ transplantation at our institution.ResultsA total of 13,037 patients underwent solid organ transplantation of which there were 94 patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (0.7%). Of these, 50 patients (53%) had cancer pre–solid organ transplantation, whereas 44 patients (47%) developed cancer post–solid organ transplantation. Papillary histology was most common (88%), followed by follicular (3%), Hurthle cell (3%), and medullary (2%) carcinomas. One patient in the post-transplant cohort died from metastatic thyroid cancer 11.8 years after transplantation. There were 5 patients in the pre-transplant group and 4 patients in the post-transplant group who had recurrent thyroid disease. There were no patients treated for differentiated thyroid cancer pre–solid organ transplantation that experienced disease recurrence after transplantation. Disease-free survival at 5 and 10 years was 95.8% and 92.1% (confidence interval 84.9–99.2%, 80.0–97.4%) in the pre–solid organ transplantation group vs 89.7% and 84.4% in the post (confidence interval: 80.0–96.3% and 79.0–93.1%, P = .363), respectively.ConclusionSurvival outcomes and recurrence rates in patients with thyroid cancer are not significantly affected by solid organ transplantation. A history of thyroid cancer or discovery of thyroid nodules during transplant screening should not be a contraindication for transplant listing.     

Everolimus Use in Lung Transplant Recipients

BackgroundMost lung transplantation centers prefer triple immunosuppressive therapy with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. However, to prevent complications and comorbidities caused by tacrolimus, replacing the drug with everolimus has been considered.MethodsThis is a retrospective observational study investigating everolimus switch for different reasons. The population was divided into 3 groups: chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), kidney impairment, and malignant neoplasm groups. We investigated whether we achieved the goal of the switch and the frequency of rejection, cytomegalovirus and fungal infections, and everolimus adverse effects.ResultsNineteen patients received everolimus therapy, and 5 of these were for CLAD, 7 for tacrolimus nephrotoxicity, and 7 for explant/de novo malignant neoplasm. The patients were followed up for a mean (SD) of 30 (16.7) months under the therapy. The number of acute cellular rejection, cytomegalovirus infection, and aspergillosis infection cases before switch were 7, 13, and 2, respectively, and 7, 2, and 3 after that. The mean values of creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate of the whole population after the switch improved with no statistical significance, whereas it was significant in tacrolimus nephrotoxicity group. Three patients in the CLAD group remained stable after switching, whereas 2 progressed. Only 1 of the 7 patients with malignant neoplasms had a recurrence during 31.1 (16.5) months of median follow-up. Eleven cases of everolimus adverse effects occurred in 9 patients (47.3%), with 2 (10.5%) withdrawal events. Kidney impairment (P = .02) and age (P = .05) stood out as significant risk factors for drug adverse effects.ConclusionsAfter lung transplant, everolimus can be a safe alternative for immunosuppression with acceptable adverse effects.     

Predictive Factors for the Resectable Type of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Living Donor Liver Transplant

Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after living donor liver transplant (LDLT) is an essential factor defining prognosis, and surgical resection is the only curative treatment. However, the factors that define whether surgical resection is possible remain unclear. Here, we compared resectable and unresectable HCC recurrence cases after LDLT and examined factors that determine whether surgical resection is possible.Resectable (n = 17) and unresectable (n = 14) groups among 264 patients who underwent LDLT for HCC from January 1999 to March 2020 were compared and examined for recurrence type, prognosis, and clinicopathologic factors. Overall survival after LDLT (median, 8.5 vs 1.7 years, P < .01) was significantly longer in the resectable group. In univariate analysis, female recipient rate, lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) ≥2.75, and tumor size ≤5.0 cm were significantly higher in the resectable group. Younger donors, lower Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores, lower graft volume, and lower graft volume to standard liver volume ratio were evident in the resectable group. In multivariate analysis, female recipient rate (P = .0034) and LMR ≥2.75 (P = .0203) were independent predictive factors for resectable HCC recurrence after LDLT. Female recipient and LMR ≥2.75 before transplant could predict the surgically resectable type of HCC recurrence after LDLT.     

Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation: Validation of a Pathologic Risk Score on Explanted Livers to Predict Recurrence

BackgroundRecurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. To date, there is no widely accepted pathologic assessment tool to predict HCC recurrence. In 2007, we developed a pathologic risk score that stratified patients into low, intermediate, or high risk for recurrence based on explant pathology. The aim of this study was to externally validate this risk score.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 124 patients over a 10-year period who underwent liver transplantation for HCC. Using explanted pathology reports, each patient was stratified according to the pathologic risk score and followed over time for HCC recurrence.ResultsRecurrence occurred in 15 patients (12%) after a mean follow-up of 25 months. Using the pathologic risk score, 10 (8%), 21 (17%), and 93 (75%) patients were stratified into high, intermediate, and low risk of recurrence, respectively. Among these risk groups, recurrence occurred in 50%, 28.5%, and 4.3% (P < .01) of patients, respectively. Using the optimal cutoff value ≤3.5, our risk score had a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 79% with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.8. Those with lower risk scores had higher recurrence-free survival (P < .0001).ConclusionsOur pathologic risk score accurately risks stratified patients for HCC recurrence after liver transplant. It can be used to tailor surveillance strategies for those deemed to be at elevated risk for recurrence.     

Indications and Management of Everolimus After Liver Transplantation

Objective

Our aim was to assess our experience with the use and management of everolimus after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

Materials and Methods

Among the 759 patients who underwent transplantation from 1988 to 2008, 25 (3.2%) received immunosuppression with everolimus. Their mean age was 55.6 years. We analyzed indications for use, time between transplantation and introduction of everolimus, as well as its efficacy, side effects, and patient survival.

Results

The indications for everolimus treatment were: extended hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the explanted liver (n = 6; 24%); HCC recurrence during follow-up (n = 4; 16%); de novo tumor (n = 6; 24%); refractory rejection (n = 3; 12%); side effects of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI; n = 3; 12%); and other causes (n = 3; 12%). Mean time between OLT and everolimus treatment was 40 ± 33 months (range, 10 days-178 months). Mean follow-up after conversion was 10 ± 9 months (range, 1.5-25 months). More than half of the patients resolved the event for which the drug was indicated: 75% of patients with refractory rejection; 60% of those with renal insufficiency; and 100% of those converted for neurotoxicity or hepatotoxicity. Two patients with recurrent HCC and 1 with extended HCC died at a mean time of 10.5 months. The 6 cases of de novo tumors were operated and are healthy. Side effects were dyslipidemia in 8 and infection in 2. Five patients (20%) discontinued the drug.

Conclusions

In the early posttransplantation period, everolimus is indicated for refractory rejection or as prophylaxis for recurrence of extended tumors. In any time but especially in the late period, everolimus is indicated for patients with serious side effects due to a CNI or to a de novo tumor.     

Prope tolerance after pediatric liver transplantation: Experience at Shiraz Organ Transplant Center

BackgroundChildren receive transplants at a younger age, and the period of immunosuppression therapy may extend over decades. However, immunosuppression seems to be responsible for long-term mortality and morbidity. Pediatric liver transplant recipients can benefit from achieving immune tolerance and the opportunity of freedom from lifelong immunosuppression. This study aimed to investigate the frequency of prope tolerance among pediatric liver transplant recipients and the characteristics of these patients.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study of pediatric liver transplant recipients, the medical records of transplant recipients treated at Shiraz Organ Transplant Center between 1994 and 2017 were reviewed. Prope tolerance was defined as normal laboratory values and stable clinical status on low-dose monotherapy. Children treated with low-dose monotherapy were categorized as the prope tolerant group. We compared the characteristics of prope tolerant recipients on low-dose monotherapy with patients on standard immunosuppression, i.e. full-dose tacrolimus plus steroids and mycophenolate mofetil. The data were analyzed with the t-test, chi-squared test, and a Cox proportional hazard model at a 5% significance level in SPSS software version 16.ResultsA total of 585 children with a mean age of 8.32 ± 5.23 years were enrolled. 341 patients were categorized as prope tolerant and 244 comprised the full immunosuppression regimen group. Mean age at transplantation and rejection frequency were lower in the prope tolerant group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). Based on the underlying diseases, metabolic/genetic, biliary tract, and cryptogenic liver diseases were significantly more prevalent in the prope tolerant group (p < 0.001). However, autoimmune liver disease was found to be more prevalent in the full immunosuppression regimen group. Also, those who received living organs (p = 0.001) and recipients of organs from female donors had a greater likelihood of achieving prope tolerant. According to the multiple Cox regression results, age at transplantation (p = 0.022), rejection frequency (p < 0.001), and autoimmune liver diseases (p = 0.028) had a prognostic effect on prope tolerance.ConclusionFactors as underlying disease, age at transplantation, and rejection frequency were factors that were predictive of prope tolerance in this sample of children. However, the risk of rejection should be considered during the tapering period.