A Nationwide Population-Based Study of the Risk of Tuberculosis in Different Solid Organ Transplantations in Taiwan

Advances in immunosuppressants for solid organ transplantation (SOT) have improved prevention and treatment of acute rejection as well as reduced the risk of chronic graft damage. However, SOT recipients are prone to developing opportunistic infections because of their long-term immunosuppressed status. Tuberculosis (TB) is a serious opportunistic infection that is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in SOT recipients. However, nationwide population-based research specifically focused on the associations between kidney transplantation (KTx), liver transplantation (LTx), and heart transplantation (HTx), and subsequent TB infection is lacking. This study was conducted using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, which provided claims data for SOT recipients from 2000 to 2009. Clinical features, treatment, and outcomes were analyzed to determine the risk for TB after SOT. In total, 153 (3.2%) RTx, 19 (1.1%) LTx, and 26 (2.8%) HTx recipients became infected with TB. Compared with non-TB patients, HTx recipients with TB had significantly higher prevalence of older age (P = .037), hypertension (P < .001), and coronary artery disease (CAD) (P = .002). There were also greater percentages of male sex (P = .018), diabetes (P = .029), hyperlipidemia (P = .016), CAD (P < .001), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (P < .001) in RTx recipients with TB than in those without. In conclusion, posttransplantation TB is a serious problem worldwide, and a high index of suspicion is warranted to ensure early diagnosis and prompt initiation of treatment for TB among SOT patients. In this preliminary study, KTx recipients had a higher risk of TB infection than LTx and HTx recipients, and the high-risk factors were male sex, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, CAD, and COPD. The use of optimal immunosuppressive agents to minimize acute rejection, monitoring of high-risk recipients, prompt diagnosis, and appropriate treatment are required for the management of TB infection in endemic areas such as Taiwan.     

Risk Factors for Mortality in Liver Transplant Recipients With ESKAPE Infection

BackgroundAlthough infections caused by the pathogens Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp (ESKAPE) have recently been identified as serious emerging problems in solid organ transplant, no information in liver transplant (LT) recipients is available. We sought to investigate the risk factors for associated mortality in LT recipients with ESKAPE infections.MethodsA retrospective analysis of infection after LT was reviewed. Risk factors for mortality caused by ESKAPE infection were identified.ResultsFifty-three episodes of infections caused by ESKAPE were documented in 51 LT recipients. The main sites of infection were the bloodstream (49.0%), the lungs (33.3%), and the intra-abdominal/biliary tract (17.6%). The risk factors for mortality independently associated with ESKAPE infection were female sex (odds ratio [OR] = 6.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1–40.8, P = .042), septic shock (OR = 30.1, 95% CI = 3.7–244.8, P = .001), and lymphocyte counts <300/mm³ (OR = 20.2, 95% CI = 2.9–142.2, P = .003).ConclusionsTo improve the results of LT, more effective therapeutic treatments are of paramount importance when female LT recipients with ESKAPE infection present with septic shock and decreased lymphocyte counts.     

Real‐life food‐safety behavior and incidence of foodborne infections in solid organ transplant recipients

Food‐safety measures are recommended in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, the actual adherence of patients in a real‐life setting and the impact on the incidence of foodborne infections remain largely unexplored. We performed a survey among SOT recipients followed at our institution, aiming to evaluate their food‐safety behavior. We assessed the incidence of microbiologically proven foodborne infections by chart review. One hundred ninety‐seven SOT recipients (kidney = 117, lung = 35, liver = 29, and heart = 16) participated in the survey. Overall, 17.7% of the participants observed all food‐safety recommendations (22.0% avoided food at risk of contamination while 67.9% applied hygiene recommendations). Patients within the first year after transplantation (odds ratio [OR] 5.42; P = .001) and females (OR 4.67; P = .001) followed food‐safety recommendations more closely. Although the majority of SOT recipients felt concerned and actively sought information on food safety (68%‐70%), only 27% were able to recognize all risks of foodborne infection in hypothetical scenarios. Incidence of proven foodborne infections was 17.9% (95% confidence interval 9.9%‐30.9%) 5 years after transplantation. Importantly, foodborne infections occurred exclusively among patients not following food‐safety recommendations. In summary, most SOT recipients eat foods that make them at risk of foodborne infections. Our results indicate that there is room for improvement in patient education, particularly later after transplantation, and reinforce current food‐safety recommendations.     

Risk factors for acute rejection in liver transplantation and its impact on the outcomes of recipients

ObjectiveTo determine the risk factors for acute rejection in liver transplantation and its impact on the outcomes of the recipients.MethodsClinicopathological data of 290 patients who underwent liver transplantation from January 2012 to December 2021 at our center were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were grouped into an acute rejection (AR) group and a normal (NM) group based on the confirmed histopathological diagnosis of acute rejection. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine the risk factors for acute rejection.Results244 patients were included in the study. Acute rejection occurred in 27 (11.1%) of the patients. Warm ischemia time (P = 0.137), cold ischemia time (P = 0.064) and chronic liver failure (P = 0.001) were potential risk factors for acute rejection. Chronic liver failure (P < 0.001, OR = 8.22, 95% CI = 2.47–27.32) was the independent risk factor. There was no significant difference in overall survival between recipients with acute rejection and those without it (P = 0.985). The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival in the NM group was 98.1%, 85.7% and 78.6% respectively vs 88.9%, 82.5% and 82.5% respectively in the AR group.ConclusionAcute rejection does not appear to affect the long-term survival of the recipients. Only chronic liver failure was an independent risk factor for acute rejection. Our findings further illustrate that contradictions still exist on which factors influence acute rejection in liver transplant recipients.SummaryClinicopathological data of 290 liver transplant recipients at our center between January 2012 and December 2021 were retrospectively evaluated to determine the risk factors for acute rejection and its impact on the outcomes of the recipients. 244 patients were included in the analysis. 27 of the 244 experienced acute rejection. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce the confounding effect. Patients were assigned to an acute rejection group (n = 27) and a normal group (n = 54). Chronic liver failure (P < 0.001, OR = 8.22, 95% CI = 2.47–27.32) was the determined to be independent risk factor for acute rejection. Acute rejection did not appear to affect the long-term survival of the recipients and there was no significant difference in overall survival between the patients with acute rejection and those without it.     

Post-transplant eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders and lymphoproliferative disorder in pediatric liver transplant recipients on tacrolimus

AimTo examine and characterize post-transplant eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (PTEGID) and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in pediatric liver transplant recipients.MethodsThis is a single center retrospective study of all liver transplant recipients aged 0–18 years from 1999 to 2019 who received tacrolimus as their primary immunosuppressant. Demographic data and clinical/laboratory data including PTEGID, PTLD, liver transplant types, Epstein-Barr virus status, and blood eosinophil count were reviewed. Analysis was done with logistic regression and Mann-Whitney U test.ResultsNinety-eight pediatric liver transplant recipients were included with median age at transplantation of 3.3 years (IQR: 1.1–9.3). The major indication for transplantation was biliary atresia, 51 (52%) cases. Eight (8%) children had PTLD and 14 (14%) had PTEGID. Receiving liver transplantation at an age of ≤1 year was associated with developing PTEGID (OR = 11.9, 95% CI = 3.5–45.6, p < 0.001). Additionally, eosinophilic count of ≥500/μL was associated with having PTLD (OR = 10.7, 95% CI = 1.8–206.0, p = 0.030) as well as having at least one liver rejection (OR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.2–7.0, p = 0.024). The frequency of food-induced anaphylaxis significantly increased post-transplantation (p = 0.023).ConclusionsPTEGID and PTLD are common in this cohort and are associated with certain risk factors that help screen children to improve recipient survival. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical benefits of these findings.     

Risk Factors for Clostridioides Difficile Diarrhea In Solid Organ Transplantation Recipients

BackgroundThere is limited knowledge about risk factors for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and recurrent CDI in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients.MethodsA case-control study of CDI in SOT recipients compared with controls (SOT recipients who did not present CDI).ResultsSixty-seven patients from 1089 SOT recipients (6.2%) suffered at least one episode of CDI. The mean age was 55 ± 12 years and 20 cases (69%) were men. The accumulated incidence was 8% in liver transplantation, 6.2% in lung transplantation, 5.4% in heart transplantation, and 4.7% in kidney transplantation. Twenty-nine cases (43.3%) were diagnosed during the first 3 months after SOT. Forty-one cases (61.2%) were hospital acquired. Thirty-one patients with CDI presented with mild-moderate infection (46.3%), 30 patients with severe infection (44.8%), and 6 patients with severe-complicated disease (9%). Independent variables found to be related with CDI were hospitalization in the previous 3 months (odds ratio: 2.99; [95% confidence interval 1.21-7.37]) and the use of quinolones in the previous month (odds ratio: 3.71 [95% confidence interval 1.16-11.8]). Eleven patients (16.4%) had at least one recurrence of CDI. Previous treatment with amoxicillin-clavulanate, severe-complicated index episode, and high serum creatinine were associated with recurrent CDI in the univariant analysisConclusionsLiver transplant recipients presented the highest incidence of CDI among SOT recipients. Risk factors for CDI were hospitalization in the previous 3 months and the use of quinolones in the previous month.     

Prevalence and predictors of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among solid organ transplant recipients with confirmed infection

It remains uncertain whether immunocompromised patients including solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients will have a robust antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. We enrolled all adult SOT recipients at our center with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who underwent antibody testing with a single commercially available anti-nucleocapsid antibody test at least 7 days after diagnosis in a retrospective cohort. Seventy SOT recipients were studied (56% kidney, 19% lung, 14% liver ± kidney, and 11% heart ± kidney recipients). Thirty-six (51%) had positive anti-nucleocapsid antibody testing, and 34 (49%) were negative. Recipients of a kidney allograft were less likely to have positive antibody testing compared to those who did not receive a kidney (p = .04). In the final multivariable model, the years from transplant to diagnosis (OR 1.26, p = .002) and baseline immunosuppression with more than two agents (OR 0.26, p = .03) were significantly associated with the antibody test result, controlling for kidney transplantation. In conclusion, among SOT recipients with confirmed infection, only 51% of patients had detectable anti-nucleocapsid antibodies, and transplant-related variables including the level and nature of immunosuppression were important predictors. These findings raise the concern that SOT recipients with COVID-19 may be less likely to form SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.     

Endocrine Management and Hormone Replacement Therapy in Cardiac Donor Management: A Retrospective Observational Study

BackgroundPituitary dysfunction after brainstem death can cause various hormone deficiencies in potential heart donors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between hormone replacement therapy (HRT; including antidiuretic hormone analog, thyroid hormone, and methylprednisolone) in heart donors and the recipients’ outcomes after heart transplantation (HTx).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed HTxs performed between January 2012 and October 2018. Donor and recipient characteristics were retrieved with a focus on endocrine parameters and HRT. The primary outcome was primary graft dysfunction (PGD). Secondary outcomes were the 30-day and 2-year mortality of the recipients. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were applied.ResultsThe study included 297 HTxs. PGD occurred in 56 recipients (18.9%). In the multivariable Cox analysis, methylprednisolone and thyroxine treatment in donors were associated with a lower odds for PGD (odds ratio [OR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.19-1.01; P = .052; and OR,: 0.34; 95% CI, 0.15-0.76; P = .009, respectively). In multivariate analysis, thyroxine treatment in donors was associated with a lower odds of PGD (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17-0.86; P = .020). Donor thyroxine supplementation also had a beneficial effect on recipients’ 2-year survival (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29-0.96; P = .036).ConclusionsCombined thyroxine and methylprednisolone treatment could be a protective factor against PGD. Thyroxine administration was associated with better 2-year survival in recipients.     

Risk Classification for Respiratory Viral Infections in Adult Solid Organ Transplantation Recipients

IntroductionMolecular testing such as nasopharyngeal viral polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (NVP) is available now in most hospitals and widely used to identify respiratory viral infections (RVIs) in solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients.Materials and MethodsA retrospective multicenter study at 8 hospitals from March 1, 2016, to April 30, 2019. We included all adult SOT recipients who were admitted to the hospitals and had their first NVP post transplantation.ResultsA total of 102 adult SOT recipients were enrolled. NVP test was positive in 33 (32.4%) SOT recipients and negative in 69 (67.6%). Median age was more than 60 years old with female predominance in both groups. The majority of patients who had positive NVP were hospitalized either in fall or winter seasons (91%). RVI symptoms were documented in about 73% of the positive NVP group. Rhinovirus was the most common identified virus (48.4%). On logistic regression analysis, clinical presentation in fall or winter seasons, presenting with upper respiratory infection (URI) symptoms and taking prednisone ≥10 mg/d were significantly associated with positive NVP. This model classified patients into 3 categories of risk for RVIs—low (none of the variables), 0%; intermediate (1 variable), 6.5%; and high (≥2 variables), 55.4% with P < .001 for all predictors.ConclusionSOT recipients who are taking prednisone (≥10 mg) and have URI symptoms in fall or winter seasons are more likely to have RVIs     

Predictor factor for worse outcomes in kidney transplant recipients infected with coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroductionThe pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a massive impact on the health sector, especially in patients with pre-existing comorbidities. This study aims to define the predictor factors for worse outcomes in kidney transplant patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 and affected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We have analyzed in these patients their prior medical history, their clinical symptoms, and their laboratory results.MethodWe assessed outcomes of kidney transplant patients with confirmed COVID-19 until July 2021 from PubMed, Medline, Science Direct, Cochrane databases, EMBASE, Scopus, and EBSCO. We performed meta-analyses of nine published studies to estimate predictor factors. The analysis was analyzed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and then using the Review Manager 5.4 software.ResultOur analysis demonstrated that the most significant risk factors for the worse COVID-19 outcomes for kidney transplant patients included: age of 60 and older [MD 9.31(95% CI, 6.31–12.30), p < 0.0001, I2 = 76%], diabetic nephropathy [OR 2.13 (95% CI, 1.49–3.04), p < 0.0001, I2 = 76%], dyspnea [OR 4.53, (95% CI, 2.22–9.22), p < 0.0001, I2 = 76%], acute kidney injury (AKI) [OR 4.53 (95% CI, 1.10–5.21), p = 0.03, I2 = 58%], and some laboratory markers. Many patients had two or multiple risk factors in combination.ConclusionAge and several comorbidities were the most significant factors for COVID-19 outcomes for kidney transplant recipients.     

RIFLE Criteria for Acute Kidney Dysfunction Following Heart Transplantation: Incidence and Risk Factors

Background and PurposeThere are few data regarding the occurrence of (RIFLE)-based acute kidney dysfunction (AKD) after heart transplantation (HT) and its risk factors. The aim of this study was to apply RIFLE criteria in patients who developed AKD following HT to compare patients with and without AKD and to determine incidence and risk factors of AKD.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the records of 65 patients who underwent HT between 2003 and 2012. We investigated 3 levels of renal dysfunction outlined in RIFLE criteria: risk (R), injury (I), and failure (F). Appropriate class was assigned comparing baseline creatinine level to peak levels in the first 7 days after HT. Perioperative variables of heart transplant recipients were collected.ResultsThe mean age at transplantation was 32.8 ± 16.6 years with 72.7% males. The incidence of AKD was 61%, risk occured in 18%, injury in 16%, and failure in 27% of the patients. Patients who had AKD were significantly older (37.9 ± 15.6 vs 24.6 ± 15.0 years: P = .008), had higher body mass index (24.7 ± 6.7 vs 18.6 ± 4.3; P = .002), and more frequently had history of hypertension (92% vs 8%; P = .011) and smoking (100% vs 0%; P = .008) when compared with those who did not have AKD. When compared with patients who did not develop AKD postoperatively, preoperative higher creatinine levels (1.1 ± 0.3 vs 0.8 ± 0.4; P = .025), intraoperative higher mean arterial pressures (99.2 ± 14.1 vs 89.0 ± 11.4 mm Hg; P = .011), a higher frequency of intraoperative acidosis (81% vs 19%; P = .041), higher lactate levels (5.1 ± 3.8 vs 2.8 ± 1.7 mmol/L; P = .038), and postoperative more frequent use of cyclosporine (91% vs 9%; P = .025) were seen in those who developed AKD. Logistic regression analysis revealed that age (odds ratio [OR], 1.057; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.010–1.106; P = .018) and use of cyclosporine (OR, 0.099; 95% CI, 0.010–0.935; P = .043) were independent risk factors for AKD.ConclusionsOur results suggest that based on RIFLE criteria, AKD occur in more than half of HTs postoperatively. Older age and use of cyclosporine are associated with AKD following HT.     

Surgical Complications Requiring an Early Relaparotomy in HIV-Infected Liver Transplant Recipients: Risk Factors and Impact on Survival

AimWe aimed to analyze the risk factors for early surgical complications requiring relaparotomy and the related impact on overall survival (OS) in HIV-infected patients submitted to liver transplantation.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study on a nationwide multicenter cohort of 157 HIV-infected patients submitted to liver transplantation in 6 Italian transplant units between 2004 to 2014.ResultsThe median preoperative model for end-stage liver disease score was 18 (interquartile range 12-26.5). An early relaparotomy was performed in 24.8% of patients, and the underlying clinical causes were biliary leak (8.2%), bleeding (8.2%), intestinal perforation (4.5%), and suspected vascular complications (3.8%). The OS at 1, 3, and 5 years was 74.3%, 68.0%, and 60.0%, respectively, and an early relaparotomy was not a prognostic factor itself, but an increasing number of relaparotomies was associated with decreased survival (hazard ratio = 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.81, P = .01). In the multivariate analysis, preoperative refractory ascites (odds ratio 3.32, 95% CI 1.18-6.47, P = .02) and Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy reconstruction (odds ratio 12.712, 95% CI 2.47-65.38, P ≤ .01) were identified as significant risk factors for early relaparotomy.ConclusionsIn HIV-infected liver transplant recipients, an increasing number of early relaparotomies due to surgical complications did negatively affect the OS. Preoperative refractory ascites reflecting a severe portal hypertension and a difficult biliary tract reconstruction requiring a Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy were associated with an increased risk of early relaparotomy.     

Impact of glutathione S-transferase T1 gene polymorphisms on acute cellular rejection in living donor liver transplantation

It has previously been demonstrated that glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) genetic mismatch between recipient and donor is a risk factor for developing immune-mediated hepatitis following liver transplantation and for antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplantation. Little is known whether the GSTT1 gene polymorphism affects the incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Patients underwent LDLT at Nagoya University or Kyoto University, Japan, between 2004 and 2009. Genotyping of GSTT1 genes (null or present genotype) was conducted in recipients and donors. A total of 155 LDLT cases were examined. Forty-seven recipients (30.3%) developed early ACR. There was no association of recipient GSTT1 genotype with ACR incidence. However, ACR incidence was significantly higher in recipients transplanted from GSTT1 present genotype donors than in those transplanted from GSTT1 null genotype donors [odds ratio (OR) = 2.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.12–5.83, p = 0.016]. Moreover, GSTT1 recipient/donor genotype mismatch (present/null or null/present) was significantly associated with ACR development (OR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.12–4.61, p = 0.022). The genotyping of GSTT1 in recipients and donors might be useful to stratify the liver transplant recipients according to risk of ACR.     

Post-Transplantation Anemia and Risk of Death Following Lung Transplantation

BackgroundPost-transplantation anemia (PTA) is frequent among solid organ transplant recipients and has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. However, the prevalence and impact of PTA in lung transplant recipients is still not elucidated.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of adult Danish lung transplant recipients between January 2010 and December 2019. The prevalence and severity of PTA were determined during the first three years post-transplantation. Associations between PTA and selected risk factors were established using uni- and multivariate logistic regression models.ResultsA total of 278 patients were included. At one and three years post–lung transplantation the prevalence of PTA was 75% and 52%, respectively. Male sex was associated with increased odds of PTA at all time points (aOR ranging from 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.6, P = 0.02 to 5.9, 95% CI 2.6-14, P < .001). Cystic fibrosis was also associated with anemia at one-year post-transplantation (aOR 4.3, 95% CI 1.2-17, P = 0.03). We found no strong associations between PTA and renal function or viral infections. Excess mortality in recipients with moderate or severe anemia compared to patients with mild or no anemia was borderline statistically significant at one-year post-lung transplantation (aHR 2.0, 95% CI 0.9-4.4, P = 0.07).DiscussionPost-transplantation anemia is very common in Danish lung transplant recipients. Male sex and cystic fibrosis are independent risk factors for development of anemia. Further investigation on PTA, the underlying mechanisms, and its clinical impact is needed.     

Long-term outcomes of retransplantation after live donor liver transplantation: A Western experience

BackgroundDespite most liver transplants in North America being from deceased donors, the number of living donor liver transplants has increased over the last decade. Although outcomes of liver retransplantation after deceased donor liver transplantation have been widely published, outcomes of retransplant after living donor liver transplant need to be further elucidated.MethodWe aimed to compare waitlist outcomes and survival post-retransplant in recipients of initial living or deceased donor grafts. Adult liver recipients relisted at University Health Network between April 2000 and October 2020 were retrospectively identified and grouped according to their initial graft: living donor liver transplants or deceased donor liver transplant. A competing risk multivariable model evaluated the association between graft type at first transplant and outcomes after relisting. Survival after retransplant waitlisting (intention-to-treat) and after retransplant (per protocol) were also assessed. Multivariable Cox regression evaluated the effect of initial graft type on survival after retransplant.ResultsA total of 201 recipients were relisted (living donor liver transplants, n = 67; donor liver transplants, n = 134) and 114 underwent retransplant (living donor liver transplants, n = 48; deceased donor liver transplants, n = 66). The waitlist mortality with an initial living donor liver transplant was not significantly different (hazard ratio = 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.23–1.10; P = .08). Both unadjusted and adjusted graft loss risks were similar post-retransplant. The risk-adjusted overall intention-to-treat survival after relisting (hazard ratio = 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.44–1.32; P = .30) and per protocol survival after retransplant (hazard ratio:1.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.54–4.19; P = .40) were equivalent in those who initially received a living donor liver transplant.ConclusionPatients requiring relisting and retransplant after either living donor liver transplants or deceased donor liver transplantation experience similar waitlist and survival outcomes.     

Mannose-binding lectin-2 and ficolin-2 gene polymorphisms and clinical risk factors for acute rejection in kidney transplantation

IntroductionThere is growing evidence that the lectin pathway is significantly associated with acute rejection. Rare studies associated both gene polymorphisms of MBL2 and FCN2 with acute rejection after kidney transplantation. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of the lectin gene profile and clinical risk factors such as PRA level on acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients.MethodsWe prospectively analyzed 157 kidney transplant recipients with and without acute rejection. A total of 6 well-known functional single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the MBL2 gene and 5 in the FCN2 gene of the recipients were determined by gene sequencing. MBL2 and FCN2 genotypic variants were analyzed for association with the incidence of acute rejection within the first year after kidney transplantation.ResultsAfter adjusting for variables of P < 0.2, we found the differences in the incidence of acute rejection were only according to panel-reactive antibodies (odds ratios (OR) = 6.468, 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 2.017–20.740, P = 0.002) and the HH genotypes of MBL2 promoter ? 550 (OR = 2.448, 95%CI = 1.026–5.839, P = 0.044).ConclusionPanel-reactive antibodies and the HH genotypes of MBL2 promoter ? 550 have significant impacts on the risk of developing acute rejection after kidney transplantation.     

Clostridium difficile infection is associated with graft loss in solid organ transplant recipients

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a leading cause of infectious diarrhea in solid organ transplant recipients (SOT). We aimed to assess incidence, risk factors, and outcome of CDI within the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (STCS). We performed a case‐control study of SOT recipients in the STCS diagnosed with CDI between May 2008 and August 2013. We matched 2 control subjects per case by age at transplantation, sex, and transplanted organ. A multivariable analysis was performed using conditional logistic regression to identify risk factors and evaluate outcome of CDI. Two thousand one hundred fifty‐eight SOT recipients, comprising 87 cases of CDI and 174 matched controls were included. The overall CDI rate per 10 000 patient days was 0.47 (95% confidence interval ([CI] 0.38‐0.58), with the highest rate in lung (1.48, 95% CI 0.93‐2.24). In multivariable analysis, proven infections (hazard ratio [HR] 2.82, 95% CI 1.29‐6.19) and antibiotic treatments (HR 4.51, 95% CI 2.03‐10.0) during the preceding 3 months were independently associated with the development of CDI. Despite mild clinical presentations, recipients acquiring CDI posttransplantation had an increased risk of graft loss (HR 2.24, 95% CI 1.15‐4.37; P = .02). These findings may help to improve the management of SOT recipients.     

Roux-en-Y Choledochojejunostomy Versus Duct-to-Duct Biliary Anastomosis in Liver Transplantation for Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy and duct-to-duct anastomosis are potential methods for biliary reconstruction in liver transplantation (LT) for recipients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). However, there is controversy over which method yields superior outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of duct-to-duct versus Roux-en-Y biliary anastomosis in patients undergoing LT for PSC.

Methods

Studies comparing Roux-en-Y versus duct-to-duct anastomosis during LT for PSC were identified based on systematic searches of 9 electronic databases and multiple sources of gray literature.

Results

The search identified 496 citations, including 7 retrospective series, and 692 patients met eligibility criteria. The use of duct-to-duct anastomosis was not associated with a significant difference in clinical outcomes, including 1-year recipient survival rates (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65–1.60; P = .95), 1-year graft survival rates (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.72–1.71; P = .64), risk of biliary leaks (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.59–2.59; P = .33), risk of biliary strictures (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 0.98–4.06; P = .06), or rate of recurrence of PSC (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.19–4.78; P = .94).

Conclusions

There were no significant differences in 1-year recipient survival, 1-year graft survival, risk of biliary complications, and PSC recurrence between Roux-en-Y and duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis in LT for PSC.     

Association between common risk factors and molecular subtypes in breast cancer patients

BackgroundBreast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women worldwide and characterized its by molecular and clinical heterogeneity. Gene expression profiling studies have classified breast cancers into five subtypes: luminal A, luminal B, HER-2 overexpressing, basal-like, and normal breast-like. Although clinical differences between subtypes have been well described in the literature, etiologic heterogeneity have not been fully studied. The aim of this study was to assess the associations between several hormonal and nonhormonal risk factors and molecular subtypes of breast cancer.MethodsThis cross-sectional study consisted of 1884 invasive breast cancer cases. Variables studied included family history, age at first full-term pregnancy, number of children, duration of lactation, menstruation history, menopausal status, blood type, smoking, obesity, oral contraceptive use, hormone replacement therapy and in vitro fertilization. The odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using multivariate logistic regression analysis.ResultsThousand two-hundred and forty nine patients had luminal A, 234 had luminal B, 169 had HER-2 overexpressing and 232 had triple negative breast cancer. The age of ≥40 years was found to be a risk factor for luminal A (OR 1.41 95% CI 1.15–1.74; p = 0.001) and HER-2 overexpressing subtype (OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.01–2.25; p = 0.04). Women who were nulliparous (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.03–2.13; p = 0.03) or who had their first full-term pregnancy at age 30 years or older (OR 1.25 95% CI 0.83–1.88; p = 0.04) were at increased risk of luminal breast cancer, whereas women with more than two children had a decreased risk (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.47–0.97; p = 0.03). Breast-feeding was also a protective factor for luminal subtype (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.53–1.04; p = 0.04) when compared to non-luminal breast cancer. We found increased risks for postmenopausal women with HER-2 overexpressing (OR 2.20, 95% CI 0.93–5.17; p = 0.04) and luminal A (OR 1.87, 95% CI 0.93–3.90, p = 0.02) breast cancers, who used hormone replacement therapy for 5 years or more. Overweight and obesity significantly increased the risk of triple negative subtype (OR 1.89 95% CI 1.06–3.37; p = 0.04 and OR 1.90 95% CI 1.00–3.61; p = 0.03), on the contrary, decreased the risk of luminal breast cancer (OR 0.63 95% CI 0.43–0.95; p = 0.02 and OR 0.50 95% CI 0.32–0.76; p = 0.002, respectively) in premenopausal women. There were no significant differences between risk of breast cancer subtypes and early menarche, late menopause, family history, postmenopausal obesity, oral contraseptive use, smoking, in vitro fertilization, blood groups and use of hands.ConclusionsReproductive and hormonal characteristics (breastfeeding, parity, age at first full-term birth, hormone replacement therapy) were associated with luminal subtype, compared to non-luminal breast cancer, as consistent with previous studies. Obesity and overweight increased the risk of triple negative subtype, particularly in premenopausal women. Older age and use of hormone replacement therapy were related to the risk of HER-2 overexpressing breast cancer. Our data suggest a significant heterogeneity in association of traditional breast cancer risk factors and tumor subtypes.     

Experience with solid organ transplantation in patients with previous immunotherapy treatment is still limited but this is changing: The survey-based view of the global transplant society

BackgroundThe use of immunotherapy for cancer is increasing and is expected to continue growing. The outcomes after solid organ transplantation(SOT) in patients who received immunotherapy before SOT remain unclear. We evaluated the global transplant surgery community's attitude towards and experience with patients who received immunotherapy for malignancy before SOT.MethodsAn online-based survey was sent to North American transplant program directors in December-2020 and members of the International Liver Transplant Society in November-2021 evaluating experiences with and attitudes towards SOT in recipients with previous immunotherapy for cancer.ResultsA total of 119 respondents completed the survey(119/175;completion rate:68%), representing centers from North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Seventy-one(62%) respondents would consider SOT in patients with a previous history of immunotherapy for cancer, whereas thirty-nine(34%) were aware of such immunotherapy-treated recipients being transplanted, with an increasing trend over the last few years(2016[n = 1]-2020[n = 14]). Institutional clinical management policies in this setting were lacking in most centers(n = 85[75%]).ConclusionsThe international transplant community is receptive to transplanting transplant candidates previously treated with immunotherapy for cancer, although experience is still limited. In this context, more centers have started to offer SOT to patients with a history of immunotherapy for cancer in recent years. However, support from clear and robust institutional policies in this endeavor is scant. Therefore, there is a high need for consensus guidelines to inform future clinical management, especially as immunotherapy for cancer is likely to continue to increase in the coming years.