Long-term effects of budesonide on inflammatory status in COPD

A beneficial effect of long-term corticosteroid treatment in patients with COPD may be linked to suppressing inflammation, in particular neutrophilic inflammation. Effects on neutrophilic and eosinophilic inflammation and on lung function of long-term inhaled budesonide treatment (800 microg daily, 6 months, double-blind, randomised, cross-over versus placebo) were studied and compared to the effects of 3 weeks oral prednisolone (30 mg daily) in 19 patients with COPD (mean age 63 y, FEV(1) 65% of predicted). Neither treatment influenced neutrophilic inflammation. Inhaled budesonide compared to placebo significantly reduced sputum % eosinophils at 3 months (-42%, p = 0.036), but not significantly at 6 months (-31%, p = 0.78). Eosinophil count per g sputum was decreased with 30% at 3 months (p = 0.09) and with 9% at 6 months (p = 0.78). FEV(1) was slightly higher after 6 months budesonide (+2.5% predicted, p = 0.09). Prednisolone significantly reduced sputum % eosinophils (-87%, p = 0.007), but did not affect eosinophil count per g sputum and did not improve FEV(1) (-0.6% predicted, p = 0.40). A higher baseline FEV(1) (%) correlated with effects of budesonide on FEV(1) (p < 0.001), effects on sputum interleukin-8 and eosinophil cationic protein (both p < 0.05) and tended to correlate with effects on sputum % eosinophils (p = 0.056). Baseline inflammatory data and effects of prednisolone did not correlate with effects of budesonide. Effects of inhaled budesonide in COPD are not restricted to patients with severe disease and may be linked to a suppression of eosinophilic inflammation. Investigating effects of prednisolone has no predictive value for long-term treatment.     

Corticosteroid resistant interstitial pneumonitis in dermatomyositis/polymyositis: prediction and treatment with cyclosporine.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the characteristics of corticosteroid resistant interstitial pneumonitis (IP) in dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM), and to evaluate the effect of cyclosporine on corticosteroid resistant IP in DM/PM. METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively the incidence, clinical features, and corticosteroid responses of IP in 111 patients with DM (56) or PM (55). All patients with DM/PM were treated with prednisolone, and corticosteroid resistant IP was defined as a progression of IP despite administration of 1 mg/kg/day prednisolone for more than 4 weeks. We also evaluated the effect of cyclosporine on corticosteroid resistant IP in patients with DM/PM. RESULTS: IP occurred in 24 of 56 DM and 12 of 55 PM patients. We then classified IP in DM/PM according to serum CPK levels at the onset of IP; IP associated with high CPK levels (type I) (19) and IP associated with normal CPK levels (type II) (17). Only 2 of 19 (11%) type I IP were resistant to prednisolone therapy, while 14 of 17 (82%) type II IP were resistant to prednisolone therapy. Thus, patients with type II IP showed poorer prognosis than those with type I IP (one year survival rate: type I 89% vs type II 31%). Cyclosporine was effective in all 5 cases with corticosteroid resistant IP in DM/PM (one year survival rate 80%). CONCLUSION: (1) Corticosteroid resistant IP develops mostly in patients with DM/PM without CPK elevation at the onset of IP (type II IP), and (2) cyclosporine is effective for the corticosteroid resistant IP in DM/PM and significantly prolongs survival of patients.     

Early treatment of stage II sarcoidosis improves 5-year pulmonary function.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 5-year prognosis of patients with stage I and stage II newly detected (< 3 months) pulmonary sarcoidosis treated immediately after diagnosis with prednisolone for 3 months followed by inhaled budesonide for 15 months. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study for 18 months. Thereafter, open follow-up without treatment. SETTING: Twenty pulmonary medicine departments in Finland. PATIENTS: One hundred eighty-nine adult patients, most of them with normal lung function, were randomized to treatment. One hundred forty-nine patients were followed up for 5 years: 79 patients with initial stage I disease and 70 patients with stage II disease. TREATMENT: Oral prednisolone for 3 months followed by inhaled budesonide for 15 months (800 microg bid), or placebo tablets followed by placebo inhaler therapy. Thereafter, treatment only on an individual basis in the case of clinical deterioration. MEASUREMENTS: Yearly follow-up visits with chest radiographs, lung function tests (FEV(1), FVC), diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), serum angiotensin-converting enzyme (SACE), and serum and urinary calcium measurements. RESULTS: No initial differences were observed in chest radiographic findings between the active-treatment and placebo-treatment groups, either in patients with initial stage I or stage II(-III) disease. However, after the 5-year follow-up, 18 steroid-treated patients (26%) and 30 placebo-treated patients (38%) still had remaining chest radiographic changes. Placebo-treated patients more frequently required treatment with corticosteroids during the 5-year follow-up (p < 0.05). Steroid-treated patients with initial stage II(-III) disease improved more in FVC and DLCO (p < 0.05). No differences in reported adverse events or in SACE, serum calcium, or urinary calcium values were seen. CONCLUSION: Immediate treatment of pulmonary stage II(-III) sarcoidosis-but not stage I disease-improved the 5-year prognosis with regard to lung function variables.     

Increase in airway neutrophils after oral but not inhaled corticosteroid therapy in mild asthma

BACKGROUND: Neutrophils, in addition to eosinophils, are prominent in the airways of patients with severe asthma who are usually on long-term oral and inhaled corticosteroid treatment. We determined whether inhaled or oral corticosteroid therapy can induce airway neutrophilia. METHODS: We performed two separate placebo-controlled studies in which patients with mild asthma were treated with either prednisolone (30mg per day for 7 days; n = 9) or placebo tablets (n = 8), or with either inhaled budesonide (800 microg twice daily for 4 weeks; n = 6) or inhaled placebo (n = 6). Fiberoptic bronchoscopy was performed before treatment and at day 7 of oral treatment, and at day 28 of inhaled therapy. Bronchial sections were immunostained with an antibody to major basic protein for eosinophils, and with an antibody to neutrophil elastase for neutrophils. Induced sputum was obtained in the prednisolone study. RESULTS: Neutrophils in airway submucosa increased after prednisolone from median 76 to 140/mm2 (P = 0.05); this change was higher than that after placebo (P = 0.04). Eosinophils decreased from 24 to 9/mm2 (P = 0.03), but this was not significantly different from placebo. Eosinophils and neutrophils, and levels of IL-8 and myeloperoxidase in induced sputum did not change after prednisolone. There was no change in neutrophil counts after budesonide, but the reduction in eosinophils was greater than placebo (P = 0.05). Budesonide improved bronchial responsiveness, but prednisolone did not. CONCLUSION: Corticosteroid therapy by the oral but not inhaled route can induce neutrophil recruitment into the airways of patients with mild asthma. This could explain the increase in airway neutrophils observed in severe asthmatics treated with oral corticosteroids.     

Which factors predict success after discontinuation of inhaled budesonide therapy in children with asthma?

Urinary eosinophil protein X (UEPX) concentration, lung function, and nonspecific bronchial hyperreactivity were determined in 40 asthmatic children (asymptomatic for 6.4 +/- 3.0 months) (mean age 9.8 +/- 2.9 years) receiving inhaled budesonide, in order to establish whether measurement of these parameters is useful in determining discontinuation of inhaled corticosteroid therapy. After the discontinuation of therapy, patients were asked to come to the Outpatient Clinic if symptoms recurred and did not respond to beta2 mimetic usage in 24 hr. Otherwise they were to be seen 2-3 months later for a follow-up visit. UEPX concentration was determined and spirometry was performed on this visit. While UEPX concentrations had increased (p < 0.0001), FEV1, FEF 25-75 and PEF had decreased significantly 2.3 +/- 0.53 months after the cessation of inhaled budesonide therapy in all children (p = 0.004, p = 0.02, p = 0.02, respectively). Due to clinical deterioration, inhaled corticosteroid therapy had to be restarted in 19 (48%) of the children (Group I), while the remaining 21 (52%) (Group II) continued to be asymptomatic during the 2.3 +/- 0.5 months follow-up period. Although the initial UEPX concentrations, spirometer variables, and methacholine PC20 values of these two groups were not statistically different, the duration of clinical remission before discontinuation of budesonide prophylaxis was significantly longer in group II (p = 0.0037). We concluded that, in determining discontinuation of inhaled corticosteroid prophylaxis, duration of clinical remission seems to be a more useful criterion than measurement of UEPX levels, lung function test, and assessment of bronchial hyperreactivity.     

Budesonide or prednisone in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid in primary sclerosing cholangitis: a randomized double-blind pilot study. Belgian-Dutch PSC Study Group

OBJECTIVE: PSC has characteristics of an (auto)immune-mediated disease: however, few studies have evaluated corticosteroid therapy for this disorder. METHODS: We performed an 8-wk double-blind randomized pilot study to assess the effects of additional treatment with 9 mg budesonide (n = 6) versus 3 mg budesonide (n = 6) versus 10 mg prednisone (n = 6) in patients who had been treated with UDCA (mean dose, 12 mg/kg/day) for at least 5 months without achieving biochemical remission. Pruritus and fatigue were evaluated using visual analog scales. Serum liver biochemistry was measured every 4 wk. At entry and at the end of the trial, adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) were measured to assess effects on the pituitary-adrenal axis. Duodenal bile was collected for assessment of biliary corticosteroid activity. RESULTS: Pruritus decreased significantly more in the prednisone group compared to both the 3-mg and the 9-mg budesonide groups (p < 0.05). Alkaline phosphatase (mean: -23.4%; p = 0.03) and IgG (mean: -16.2%; p = 0.04) decreased in the prednisone group, whereas bilirubin, gamma-glutamyl transferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase did not change significantly. No significant clinical or liver biochemical changes were observed in the 3-mg and 9-mg budesonide groups. Significantly larger drops in serum ACTH were found in the 10-mg prednisone group (-40.7%; p = 0.04) and 9-mg budesonide group (-36.6%; p = 0.02) compared to the 3-mg budesonide group (+ 19.0%). No significant differences in percentage change in baseline values for DHEA between the three treatment arms were found. Mononuclear cell proliferation assays did not demonstrate corticosteroid activity in bile. Autoimmune hepatitis was observed in one case (9 mg budesonide) when corticosteroids were tapered off. CONCLUSION: The results of this pilot study suggest only minor beneficial short-term effects of prednisone but not budesonide on symptoms and serum liver tests in UDCA-treated PSC patients.     

Budesonide versus prednisolone for the treatment of active Crohn's disease in children: a randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trial

OBJECTIVES: Budesonide is a corticosteroid with low systemic bioavailability because of its high first-pass metabolism in the liver. In this paediatric, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, controlled, multicentre trial, the safety and efficacy of budesonide versus prednisolone were evaluated in children with active Crohn's disease. METHODS: Forty-eight children, aged 6-16 years, with active Crohn's disease (Crohn's Disease Activity Index > 200) involving ileum and/or ascending colon were randomized to receive budesonide (9 mg/day for 8 weeks, 6 mg/day for 4 weeks) or prednisolone (1 mg/kg/day for 4 weeks, tapering for 8 weeks). RESULTS: The groups were comparable for age, sex, pubertal stage, disease activity and disease duration. Mean morning plasma cortisol concentration was significantly higher in the budesonide group (200 nmol/l) than in the prednisolone group (98 nmol/l) after 8 weeks, reflecting less adrenal suppression by budesonide (difference -102 nmol/l; 95% CI -226, -52; P = 0.0028). Glucocorticosteroid side effects such as moon face and acne occurred significantly less frequently in the budesonide group. Remission (Crohn's Disease Activity Index < or = 150) was seen at 8 weeks in 12/22 (55%) patients treated with budesonide and in 17/24 (71%) patients receiving prednisolone (difference -16%; 95% CI -45,13; P = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: Significantly fewer side effects and less adrenal suppression were observed in the children receiving budesonide. Remission rates were not significantly different in the two groups. However, there was a trend for prednisolone to be more effective for inducing remission.     

Bone mineral density in relation to efficacy and side effects of budesonide and prednisolone in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Osteoporosis frequently occurs in Crohn's disease, often because of corticosteroids. Budesonide as controlled release capsules is a locally acting corticosteroid with low systemic bioavailability. We investigated its effects on bone compared with prednisolone. METHODS: In 34 international centers, 272 patients with Crohn's disease involving ileum and/or colon ascendens were randomized to once daily treatment with budesonide or prednisolone for 2 years at doses adapted to disease activity. One hundred eighty-one corticosteroid-free patients had active disease (98 had never received corticosteroids, corticosteroid naive; 83 had received corticosteroids previously, corticosteroid exposed), and 90 had quiescent disease, receiving long-term low doses of corticosteroids, corticosteroid-dependent; in 1 patient, no efficacy data were obtained. Bone mineral density and fractures were assessed in a double-blinded fashion; disease activity, side effects, and quality of life were monitored. RESULTS: Neither the corticosteroid-free nor the corticosteroid-dependent patients treated with budesonide differed significantly in bone mineral density from those receiving prednisolone. However, corticosteroid-naive patients receiving budesonide had smaller reductions in bone mineral density than those on prednisolone (mean, -1.04% vs -3.84%; P = .0084). Treatment-emergent corticosteroid side effects were less frequent with budesonide. Efficacy was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with budesonide is associated with better preserved bone mass compared with prednisolone in only the corticosteroid-naive patients with active ileocecal Crohn's disease. In both the corticosteroid-free and corticosteroid-dependent groups, budesonide and prednisolone were equally effective for up to 2 years, but budesonide caused fewer corticosteroid side effects.     

Efficacy and safety of high-dose budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort) compared with budesonide administered either concomitantly with formoterol or alone in patients with persistent symptomatic asthma

OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND: Budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 microg, two inhalations bd, is an effective and well-tolerated maintenance therapy for patients not controlled on inhaled corticosteroids alone. The authors assessed the efficacy and safety of a higher dose of budesonide/formoterol in patients with persistent symptomatic asthma. METHODS: This was a 24-week, double-blind, double-dummy randomized study. Budesonide/formoterol 320/9 microg, two inhalations bd (1280/36 microg/day), was compared with corresponding doses of budesonide during weeks 1-12 and budesonide plus formoterol via separate inhalers during weeks 1-24. Efficacy was assessed during weeks 1-12; the primary variable was morning PEF. Safety was assessed over weeks 1-24. RESULTS: Patients (n=456; aged 12-79 years) had a mean reversibility in FEV1 of 28% and mean pre-study inhaled corticosteroid dose of 1038 microg/day. Mean morning PEF increased by 37 L/min and 36 L/min with budesonide/formoterol and budesonide plus formoterol, respectively, versus an increase of 5 L/min with budesonide (P<0.001 for both vs. budesonide). Budesonide/formoterol increased time to first mild exacerbation (P<0.005) versus budesonide. Budesonide/formoterol and budesonide plus formoterol had similar efficacy. All treatments were well tolerated and the incidence of class-related adverse events was similarly low in all groups. Changes in serum potassium and plasma cortisol were comparable across treatments. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose budesonide/formoterol (320/9 microg, two inhalations bd) is effective and well tolerated in patients with persistent symptomatic asthma. The findings also support the safety of regular high-dose formoterol (36 microg/day).     

Adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/formoterol or budesonide: double-blind study

Adjustable maintenance dosing with either budesonide/formoterol or budesonide was compared in asthma patients. This double-blind trial randomized 133 patients (mean forced expiratory volume in 1s 66% predicted) to receive 2 inhalations twice daily of budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 microg (640/18 microg/day) or budesonide 320 microg (1280 microg/day) for 4 weeks. The study drug was adjusted in both groups according to symptoms to 2-4 inhalations daily during Weeks 5-8 and 1-4 inhalations daily during Weeks 9-20. Asthma was well controlled in both groups, with minimal levels of treatment failure (5 budesonide/formoterol vs. 2 budesonide patients; P=NS) and minimal use of reliever therapy. Clinically important improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQL) occurred in the physical functioning and emotional role functioning domains (both P<0.05) for the budesonide/formoterol group compared with budesonide. Physician and patient treatment satisfaction favored budesonide/formoterol (both P<0.05). Budesonide/formoterol patients used fewer daily inhalations of study drug (P=0.024). The median average daily inhaled corticosteroid dose during the study was 448 microg with budesonide/formoterol and 1152 microg with budesonide. Adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/formoterol and budesonide resulted in high levels of asthma control. Adjustable budesonide/formoterol treatment achieved greater HRQL benefits and patient satisfaction, with lower overall drug use.     

Initial response and subsequent course of Crohn's disease treated with elemental diet or prednisolone.

Elemental diet is as effective as corticosteroids in the treatment of previously untreated Crohn's disease. It is unclear whether a poor nutritional state is a prerequisite for efficacy of elemental diet, whether previously treated patients respond as well, or how duration of remission using elemental diet compares with corticosteroid induced remission. Forty two patients with active Crohn's disease were stratified for nutritional state and randomised to receive Vivonex TEN 2.1 l/day for four weeks, or 0.75 mg prednisolone/kg/day for two weeks and subsequent reducing doses. Nine of 22 (41%) patients assigned to nutritional treatment were intolerant of the diet. Thirty patients completed four weeks treatment. Disease activity decreased on elemental diet from mean (SEM) 4.8 (0.9) to 1.7 (0.6), p < 0.05, and on prednisolone from 5.3 (0.5) to 1.9 (0.6), p < 0.05. For each treatment, nourished and malnourished patients responded similarly. Patients with longstanding disease responded as well as newly diagnosed patients. The probability of maintaining remission at six months was 0.67 after prednisolone, 0.28 after elemental diet, and at one year was 0.35 after prednisolone and 0.09 after elemental diet, p < 0.05. When tolerated, elemental diet is as effective in the short term as prednisolone in newly and previously diagnosed Crohn's disease, and its benefit is independent of nutritional state. The subsequent relapse rate after elemental diet induced remission, however, is greater than after treatment with prednisolone.     

Oral prednisolone followed by inhaled budesonide in newly diagnosed pulmonary sarcoidosis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study. Finnish Pulmonary Sarcoidosis Study Group.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of oral prednisolone, followed by inhaled budesonide, in patients with newly diagnosed (<3 months) stage I and stage II pulmonary sarcoidosis. DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study. SETTING: Twenty pulmonary medicine departments in Finland. PATIENTS: One hundred eighty-nine adult patients were randomized to treatment. Patients with erythema nodosum or stage IV sarcoidosis (pulmonary fibrosis), and patients requiring immediate treatment with oral corticosteroids for extrapulmonary lesions or chronic illnesses were excluded. TREATMENT: The patients received either oral prednisolone for 3 months (20 mg/d for 8 weeks, 15 mg/d for 2 weeks, and 10 mg/d for 2 weeks) followed by inhaled budesonide (Pulmicort Turbuhaler; Astra Draco; Lund, Sweden) for 15 months at 800 microg bid, or placebo tablets followed by placebo inhaler therapy. MEASUREMENTS: Chest radiographs, lung volumes (FVC), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (D(LCO)), serum angiotensin-converting enzyme (SACE), and beta2-microglobulin at 3-month intervals. RESULTS: After 3 months of treatment, radiographic improvements were seen in the active-treatment group when compared to the placebo-treatment group. At 6 months, the difference was still statistically significant. Later, no differences were found. In patients with initial stage I lesions, neither the FVC nor the D(LCO) (the percent predicted mean values) changed during the study, as they were normal from the beginning. In patients with initial stage II disease, the difference in the FVC mean values between the groups also remained unchanged throughout the study. In stage II patients treated for 18 months, but not earlier, the difference in D(LCO) became statistically significant; the largest differences were seen in patients with initial FVC values <80% of predicted and D(LCO) values <75% of predicted. The decrease in SACE in the active-treated stage II patients was significantly larger than in the placebo-treated patients. No difference was observed in adverse events between the active-treated patients and the placebo-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Treatment is not required for patients with stage I disease. An initial treatment with prednisolone followed by long-term inhalation of budesonide is more effective than placebo in patients with stage II disease. Sequential oral and inhaled corticosteroid therapy may be an alternative treatment regimen for stage II sarcoidosis patients, rather than long-term oral corticosteroid therapy alone.     

Role of azathioprine in severe ulcerative colitis: one-year, placebo-controlled, randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of azathioprine in treating patients with severe ulcerative colitis. DESIGN: One-year, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. SUBJECTS: 83 patients with severe ulcerative colitis were enrolled. Fifty patients who relapsed within two months on corticosteroid withdrawal were randomized into two groups. The azathioprine group received oral sulfasalazine (6-8 g/day), oral prednisolone (1 mg/Kg/day) and oral azathioprine (2 mg/Kg/day). The placebo group received oral sulfasalazine (6-8 g/day), oral prednisolone (1 mg/Kg/day) and placebo. Corticosteroids were tapered over 12-16 weeks. RESULTS: Five patients (2 in azathioprine group, 3 in placebo group) dropped out of the study. Three patients in the azathioprine group had side effects. The number of patients going into complete remission and partial remission was not significantly different in the two groups. The proportion of relapses in the azathioprine group was lower than in the placebo group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ulcerative colitis, azathioprine had no effect in achieving remission, when given in combination with prednisolone; however, it lowers the proportion of relapses. Side effects like pancreatitis and hepatitis are mild and respond promptly to drug withdrawal.     

A controlled randomized trial of budesonide versus prednisolone retention enemas in active distal ulcerative colitis

Sixty-four patients with active distal ulcerative colitis participated in a multicentre, randomized, investigator-blind trial to compare the effect of budesonide enema, 2 mg/100 ml, with prednisolone disodium phosphate enema, 31.25 mg/100 ml. Budesonide is a new potent corticosteroid with a rapid first-pass elimination. The patients were treated for 4 weeks, and the efficacy of the drugs were evaluated by sigmoidoscopy, histology, and subjective symptoms after 2 and 4 weeks. After 4 weeks of treatment 16 of 31 patients (52%) receiving budesonide enema had healed endoscopically, compared with 8 of 33 (24%) (p = 0.045) receiving prednisolone enema. Budesonide was superior to prednisolone in terms of both significantly improved sigmoidoscopic and histologic scores and subjective symptoms evaluated by visual analogue scales. The patients receiving prednisolone had a significant depression of endogenous cortisol levels during the treatment period, but not the patients receiving budesonide. Budesonide enema seems to be a promising therapy for active distal ulcerative colitis and causes no adverse reactions.     

High-Dose Inhaled Budesonide May Substitute for Oral Therapy After an Acute Asthma Attack

Patients attending the emergency room with acute asthma, participating in a study comparing salbutamol (albuterol in the United States) via a dry powder inhaler (Turbuhaler®) with pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), were included in this 1-week follow-up study with the aim of assessing whether inhaled budesonide via Turbuhaler may be an alternative to prednisolone tablets after an acute asthma attack. Eighty-one patients with a mean age of 38 years and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV₁) of 64% predicted normal value after treatment with salbutamol were randomized in this double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. The doses given were budesonide 1600 μg b.i.d. or prednisolone in daily doses from 40 mg (day 1) decreased to 5 mg (day 7). FEV₁ was recorded before and after the 7-day treatments and peak expiratory flow (PEF) morning and evening, clinical symptoms (visual analogue scale 0–100), and doses of rescue medication (terbutalineTurbuhaler 0.25 mg/dose) were recorded daily. The mean increase in FEV, from baseline to day 7 was 1 7.3% in the budesonide Turbuhaler group and 1 7.6% in the prednisolone group. Mean values of morning PEF increased from day 1 to day 7 by 67 L/min in the budesonide Turbuhaler group and by 57 L/min in the prednisolone group (not significant). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in clinical symptoms and in the number of doses of rescue medication. Because of disease deterioration, five patients in the Turbuhaler group and three in the prednisolone group needed additional symptomatic as well as corticosteroid treatment. Inhaled budesonide in high doses may be a substitute for oral therapy as follow-up treatment after an acute asthma attack.     

Incomplete Remission with Short-Term Prednisolone Treatment in Collagenous Colitis: a Randomized Study

Background: Microscopic colitis is a disease of unknown aetiology characterized by chronic watery diarrhoea and diarrhoea can be eliminated by budesonide but frequently recurs when budesonide is stopped. We studied whether prednisolone could induce remission in patients with disabling, chronic diarrhoea due to microscopic colitis. Methods: A double-blind, randomized (3:1) trial of oral prednisolone 50 &#114 mg daily or placebo for 2 weeks. Remission was defined as stool weight &#104 200 &#114 g/day or frequency &#104 2/day; effect was defined as >50% reduction of either stool frequency or weight. Six centres screened 31 consecutive patients and included 11 with collagenous colitis and 1 with lymphocytic colitis. Median duration of diarrhoea was 9 months. Patients had a normal colonoscopy, and no evidence of coeliac disease, bile acid or lactose malabsorption. Patients with gastrointestinal infection, previous gastrointestinal surgery, abnormal biochemical screening or recent treatment with immunosuppressive agents were excluded. Results: Stool weight (grams) declined in 7 of 9 patients given prednisolone and in 1 of 3 receiving placebo; changes in median weight were from 430 to 278 and from 825 to 489, respectively. Stool frequency (per day) declined from 6 to 3 and from 8 to 5. Remission was obtained in 2 and 0, and effect in 5 and 0, respectively (NS; Fisher exact test). Conclusions: Prednisolone 50 &#114 mg daily for 2 weeks induces incomplete remission in patients with chronic diarrhoea due to collagenous colitis.     

Incomplete remission with short-term prednisolone treatment in collagenous colitis: a randomized study

BACKGROUND: Microscopic colitis is a disease of unknown aetiology characterized by chronic watery diarrhoea and diarrhoea can be eliminated by budesonide but frequently recurs when budesonide is stopped. We studied whether prednisolone could induce remission in patients with disabling, chronic diarrhoea due to microscopic colitis. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized (3:1) trial of oral prednisolone 50 mg daily or placebo for 2 weeks. Remission was defined as stool weight < or = 200 g/day or frequency < or = 2/day; effect was defined as > 50% reduction of either stool frequency or weight. Six centres screened 31 consecutive patients and included 11 with collagenous colitis and 1 with lymphocytic colitis. Median duration of diarrhoea was 9 months. Patients had a normal colonoscopy, and no evidence of coeliac disease, bile acid or lactose malabsorption. Patients with gastrointestinal infection, previous gastrointestinal surgery, abnormal biochemical screening or recent treatment with immunosuppressive agents were excluded. RESULTS: Stool weight (grams) declined in 7 of 9 patients given prednisolone and in 1 of 3 receiving placebo; changes in median weight were from 430 to 278 and from 825 to 489, respectively. Stool frequency (per day) declined from 6 to 3 and from 8 to 5. Remission was obtained in 2 and 0, and effect in 5 and 0, respectively (NS; Fisher exact test). CONCLUSIONS: Prednisolone 50 mg daily for 2 weeks induces incomplete remission in patients with chronic diarrhoea due to collagenous colitis.     

High-Dose Inhaled Budesonide May Substitute for Oral Therapy After an Acute Asthma Attack

Patients attending the emergency room with acute asthma, participating in a study comparing salbutamol (albuterol in the United States) via a dry powder inhaler (Turbuhaler®) with pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), were included in this 1-week follow-up study with the aim of assessing whether inhaled budesonide via Turbuhaler may be an alternative to prednisolone tablets after an acute asthma attack. Eighty-one patients with a mean age of 38 years and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV₁) of 64% predicted normal value after treatment with salbutamol were randomized in this double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. The doses given were budesonide 1600 μg b.i.d. or prednisolone in daily doses from 40 mg (day 1) decreased to 5 mg (day 7). FEV₁ was recorded before and after the 7-day treatments and peak expiratory flow (PEF) morning and evening, clinical symptoms (visual analogue scale 0-100), and doses of rescue medication (terbutalineTurbuhaler 0.25 mg/dose) were recorded daily. The mean increase in FEV, from baseline to day 7 was 1 7.3% in the budesonide Turbuhaler group and 1 7.6% in the prednisolone group. Mean values of morning PEF increased from day 1 to day 7 by 67 L/min in the budesonide Turbuhaler group and by 57 L/min in the prednisolone group (not significant). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in clinical symptoms and in the number of doses of rescue medication. Because of disease deterioration, five patients in the Turbuhaler group and three in the prednisolone group needed additional symptomatic as well as corticosteroid treatment. Inhaled budesonide in high doses may be a substitute for oral therapy as follow-up treatment after an acute asthma attack.     

Clinical effectiveness of nebulised budesonide in the treatment of acute asthma attacks

Nebulized budesonide (NB) might offer topical anti-inflammatory activity and be an alternative to systemic corticosteroid (SC) in the treatment of acute asthma. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of NB with SC on lung function and clinical findings of adult patients with acute asthma. Thirty patients admitted to clinic with asthma attack (F/M: 26/4; mean age: 47.1 +/- 2.1 years) were enrolled to the study. The patients were randomized into three groups; Group I were treated with NB alone (4 mg/day), Group II SC alone (1 mg/kg/day methylprednisolone), Group III NB plus SC. Pulmonary functions and respiratory symptom scores were measured and recorded before and during 7 days of study. Spirometric parameters significantly improved in all groups at 7th day significantly (p< 0.05) without a difference among groups (p> 0.05). FEV(1) % levels increased significantly at the first day of study in Group I and III (p< 0.05), but didn't change in Group II until 5th day of study. The mean symptom scores decreased significantly at the second day in Group I (p< 0.05), and at the 4th day in other groups. NB with or without SC improved successfully airway obstruction and symptoms in patients hospitalized with acute asthma attack as the 1st treatment day in comparison with SC alone and this effect lasted for 7 days. Regarding the superior safety profile and comparable efficacy with SC, NB might be an alternative to the patients with moderate-severe asthma attacks.     

Effects of budesonide and prednisolone on hepatic kinetics for urea synthesis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Glucocorticoids upregulate hepatic urea synthesis and cause protein breakdown to prevail over synthesis, releasing amino acids into the blood stream and increasing the substrate supply for hepatic urea synthesis. Budesonide is a new generation glucocorticoid that may be used for treatment of inflammatory diseases, e.g. Crohn's disease and autoimmune hepatitis. Due to its extensive first-pass metabolism in the liver, it has a potential adverse effect profile superior to that of prednisolone. Little attention has been directed towards differences in nitrogen catabolic properties between budesonide and prednisolone. METHODS: Eight normal male subjects (age 20-44 years; BMI 21.6-28.2 kg/m2) were randomly studied 3 times: 1) At baseline, 2) after 6 days of prednisolone (50 mg/day), and 3) after 6 days of budesonide (9 mg/ day). We measured urea nitrogen synthesis rates (UNSR) and blood alpha-amino-nitrogen (N) levels before, during, and after a 3-h constant infusion of alanine (2 mmol/(kg BW x h)). UNSR was estimated hourly as urinary excretion corrected for gut hydrolysis and accumulation in body water. The slope of the linear relationship between UNSR and amino-N concentration represents the hepatic kinetics of conversion of amino- to urea-N, and is denoted the functional hepatic nitrogen clearance (FHNC). RESULTS: Prenisolone, but not budesonide, administration increased basal blood and amino nitrogen concentrations (3.5 +/- 0.1 mmol/l (control) vs 3.8 +/- 0.1 mmol/l (prednisolone) (p<0.05) and 3.6 +/- 0.1 mmol/l (budesonide) (NS). Basal UNSR values were significantly increased following prednisolone (23.3 +/- 6.5 (control) vs 51.2 +/- 6.3 (prednisolone) (p<0.05)), while budesonide had no effect on basal UNSR (33.7 +/- 4.2 (budesonide) (NS)). Prednisolone administration increased FHNC (from 24.6 +/- 4.7 l/h (control) to 47.3 +/- 5.9 l/h (prednisolone) (p<0.05). Budesonide administration did not significantly increase FHNC (33.7 +/- 4.2 l/h (budesonide), (vs control; p=0.12, vs prednisolone: p<0.05)). CONCLUSIONS: Prednisolone administration led to increased levels of amino acids in blood and loss of N as urea, the latter in part due to a specific hepatic mechanism as shown by the increased FHNC. Budesonide led to unaltered levels of amino acids in blood, no changes in loss of N as urea, and unaltered hepatic kinetics for urea synthesis. Thus, oral budesonide administration had very limited effects on the hepatic contribution to nitrogen homeostasis and metabolism via urea synthesis, making treatment with budesonide superior to that of conventional glucocorticoids in this respect.