Combination chemotherapy with carboplatin, etoposide, and vincristine as first-line treatment in small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The antineoplastic activity of carboplatin and etoposide may be improved by the addition of vincristine (CEV) because of its low myelosuppressive potential and its activity in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). A phase II study with CEV was carried out. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-one untreated patients with SCLC (63 with limited disease [LD], 58 with extensive disease [ED]) were treated with a combination of 300 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) on day 1, etoposide 140 mg/m2 IV daily on days 1 to 3, and vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. RESULTS: A 90% rate overall response rate including 56% complete responses (CRs) was achieved in LD and an 83% overall response rate including 35% CRs was observed in ED. Median survival time was 13 months in limited disease and 9.5 months in extensive disease. The 24 and 36 months survival rates were 29% in LD and 9% in ED. Myelosuppression was the main form of toxicity. CONCLUSION: The combination of CEV is a new active and well-tolerated regimen in the treatment of SCLC. Prospective randomized studies of CEV with conventional chemotherapy are warranted.     

High-dose induction chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

To exploit possible dose-response and combination drug synergism, 20 previously untreated patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) received one or two courses of high-dose induction chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide (100 mg/kg), etoposide (1,200 mg/m2), and cisplatin (120 mg/m2) (HDCEP). HDCEP was followed by four cycles of standard-dose cyclophosphamide (1,000 mg/m2), doxorubicin (40 mg/m2), and vincristine (1.4 mg/m2) (CAV). Response was determined after HDCEP and following CAV. Reevaluation included repeat bronchoscopy and chest computerized tomography (CT), as well as repetition of all initially abnormal studies. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Overall response to HDCEP was 90%, with a complete response (CR) rate of 65% (95% confidence limits, 44% to 86%) and a partial response (PR) rate of 25% (95% confidence limits, 6% to 44%). All patients either maintained or improved their initial response while receiving CAV. Median duration of response was 6 months (range, 2 to 12 months) and median survival was 9.5 + months (range, 2 to 21 + months). All 37 courses of HDCEP were associated with leukopenia (less than 1,000/microL), 92% with thrombocytopenia (less than 20,000/microL), and 84% with fever of greater than 38.5 degrees C. Additional toxicities included bacteremia (24%), nausea and emesis (59%), mucositis (57%), diarrhea (38%), and hemorrhagic cystitis (5%). There were two treatment-related deaths due to infection. A third patient died 4 months after completing HDCEP with pulmonary fibrosis. Although response duration and median survival were not improved, HDCEP produced a high CR rate in ambulatory patients with extensive-stage SCLC.     

Etoposide plus cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer

Introduction

Since the decade of the 80's, the etoposide plus cisplatinum regimen has been the standard treatment in patients with localised small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Randomised trials have demonstrated the benefit of chemotherapy in combination with hyper-fractionated radiotherapy in this subset of patients.

Material and methods

Between January 1993 and June 1999, a total of 59 patients with localised SCLC were recruited into the study. All patients received 4 cycles of chemotherapy every 21 days. The first cycle was administered concurrently with hyper-fractionated radiotherapy. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was administered subsequently when complete response was obtained.

Results

The proposed treatment schedule was successfully accomplished in 54 patients. The more important toxicities noted were oesophagitis and myelotoxicity, febrile neutropenia in 6 patients (10%), and oesophagitis grade IV in 9 patients (15%). Complete response was achieved in 39 cases (72%) and partial response in 11 (20%). Median survival was 20 months.

Conclusions

We conclude that the schedule combining etoposide + cisplatin with concurrent hyperfractionated radiotherapy is the best therapeutic scheme currently on offer in the management of patients with localised SCLC.     

Combination chemotherapy with bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

Fifty-three patients with recurrent and advanced stage (III and IV) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated with a combination of bleomycin, etoposide (VP-16-213), and cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (BEP). Forty-eight patients were appraisable for response. The response rates were 44% for the entire group, 57% in 30 patients with combined squamous-cell and large-cell carcinoma, and 22% in 18 patients with adenocarcinoma (40%, 50%, and 19%, respectively, if patients not appraisable for response are included as nonresponders). The median survival time of patients with squamous-cell and large-cell carcinoma was slightly longer than that of patients with adenocarcinoma (23 weeks v 19 weeks). Patients with responsive disease survived significantly longer (median, 34 weeks) than did patients with unresponsive disease (median, 16 weeks) (P = .001). In the entire group, the median survival time of patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 was better (23 weeks) than of those with a status of 2 or 3 (15 weeks), but this difference was not seen in the subgroup with squamous-cell and large-cell carcinoma (24 weeks v 23 weeks, respectively). Thus, the performance status was not of prognostic value in the histologic subgroups experiencing the best response rate. There were two treatment-related deaths, but otherwise the toxicity of BEP was acceptable. Only four of the 119 treatment cycles were followed by fever even though there was significant neutropenia (0.5 X 10(9)/L) after 20 of 97 treatment cycles. The majority of patients receiving BEP experienced relief of cough, hemoptysis, pain, and fatigue associated with their disease. There was a good correlation between objective responses and palliation of symptoms. Thus, BEP offers good palliation, particularly for patients with squamous-cell and large-cell lung cancer.     

Combination chemotherapy with cisplatin, etoposide and irinotecan in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer: A phase II study of the Hellenic Co-operative Oncology Group

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin, etoposide and irinotecan as first-line treatment in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer (E-SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemo-na?ve adult patients with a performance status (PS) of 0-2 and adequate organ function were eligible. Patients received cisplatin 20mg/m(2) i.v. daily for three consecutive days, etoposide 75mg/m(2) i.v. daily for three consecutive days and irinotecan 120mg/m(2) i.v. on day 2, every 21 days for six to eight cycles. Administration of G-CSF was given in the presence of febrile neutropenia and as a 5-day prophylaxis around the recorded nadir day in patients who developed grades 3-4 neutropenia. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were assessable. The median age was 62.2 years; 96.4% had PS 0-1, 33.5% had >3 metastatic sites. The overall response rate was 80.4% with 8 (14.3%) patients achieving a complete response. The median time to tumor progression was 7.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 7.1-8.6 months] with a median survival of 15.1 months [95% CI, 9.7-20.5 months] and 1-year survival rate of 56.5%. One patient died from toxicity. Grades 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 37.5% of patients, grades 3-4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 10.9% of patients and 11 (19.6%) patients developed febrile neutropenia. Grades 3-4 non-hematological toxicities were primarily nausea-vomiting 3.6%, diarrhea 7.1% and fatigue 3.6%. CONCLUSION: This study strongly suggests that cisplatin, etoposide and irinotecan combination is very effective for the treatment of E-SCLC with good safety profile. The triplet regimen currently seems a promising regimen and has to be further explored in phase III trials.     

Phase II trial of combination chemotherapy with cisplatin, carboplatin and etoposide in stage IIIB and IV small-cell lung cancer

Purpose: A phase II trial combining cisplatin, carboplatin and etoposide was conducted in previously untreated patients with stage IIIB and IV small-cell lung cancer, in an attempt to increase response rates and prolong survival. Methods: Previously untreated patients with small-cell lung cancer, with measurable disease, aged ≤ 72 years, performance status ≤ 2, and adequate hematologic, hepatic and renal function were enrolled in the study. They were treated with 80 mg/m² cisplatin on day 1, 100 mg/m² carboplatin on days 2, 3 and 8, and 50 mg/m² etoposide on days 1, 2, 3 and 8. Results: A total of 46 patients (20 with stage IIIB and 26 with stage IV disease) were enrolled in the study. A total of 186 courses of chemotherapy were given, and the dose was reduced in 27 courses (15%). The chemotherapy was repeated for four or more courses in 30 patients. There were 10 complete responses and 32 partial responses, for a total response rate of 91% (95% confidence interval, 79% to 98%). The median survival time and 2-year survival rates were 18 months and 22% for stage IIIB disease, and 14 months and 15% for stage IV disease. Major side effects were hematologic: leukopenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia of grade 3 or more occurred in 48%, 46%, and 43% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: The three-drug regimen of cisplatin, carboplatin and etoposide is feasible and active against small-cell lung cancer. Received: 21 May 1997 / Accepted: 11 September 1997     

拓扑替康联合顺铂治疗小细胞肺癌疗效观察

目的:探讨拓扑替康(topotecan,TPT)联合顺铂(DDP)治疗小细胞肺癌(smallcelllungcancer,SCLC)的疗效。方法:35例初治SCLC患者应用TPT1mg/(m2·d),静脉滴入30min;联合DDP20mg/(m2·d),静脉滴入,连用5d,每3周为1个周期,2～3个周期后评价疗效和不良反应。结果:TPT与DDP联合用于初治SCLC有效率为74.3%(26/35),其中CR20.0%(7/35),PR54.3%(19/35)。主要不良反应为骨髓抑制,其中Ⅲ～Ⅳ度中性粒细胞缺乏为54.3%(19/35),Ⅲ～Ⅳ度血小板下降为34.3%(12/35),Ⅲ～Ⅳ度血红蛋白下降为20.0%(7/35),非血液学毒性较轻。结论:TPT联合DDP是治疗SCLC疗效较好方案,主要不良反应为血液学毒性。     

Unresectable non-small cell lung cancer chemotherapy with high-dose cisplatin and etoposide

69 patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer, previously untreated, received cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 and etoposide 120 mg/m2 on days 4, 6, 8 at 4-week intervals. 66 patients were evaluable for tumor response and toxicity. Overall objective response was 25.7% (3 complete responses and 14 partial responses). Response rate in limited disease was 41% and in patients with performance score 0 it was 40%. Squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma responded in 31 and 24% of evaluable patients. Complete response was associated with a long duration of remission. Median survival time of responding patients was significantly superior to the median of nonresponding patients (p less than 0.001) but compared to stable disease no statistical significance was demonstrable (p greater than 0.05). Hematological and renal toxicity of proposed regimen was generally mild. Nausea and vomiting were the most noxious side effects.     

Early concurrent chemoradiotherapy with prolonged oral etoposide and cisplatin for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Combined chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment modality for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LSCLC), but the optimal timing of radiation is controversial. Prolonged oral etoposide has the advantage of prolonged exposure, which possibly leads to improved clinical outcome. We conducted a phase II trial of early concurrent CRT, starting from the very beginning of the first cycle of chemotherapy for previously untreated LSCLC. METHODS: Chemotherapy was given for six cycles, each consisting of oral etoposide (50 mg/m(2) daily from day 1 to 14) and intravenous cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) on day 1), every 3 weeks. Thoracic radiation therapy was given from day 1 of the first cycle of chemotherapy, administered at 2.0 Gy in 22 daily fractions to a total dose of 44 Gy. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were enrolled. The median age was 60 years (range, 42-77 years), including 15 patients (34%) over 65 years-of-age. We observed a complete response rate of 52% (95% CI, 37-67%), and an overall response rate of 88% in an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Median overall survival was 14.9 months (95% CI, 11.4-18.3 months) and the median time to progression was 10.8 months (95% CI, 9.3-12.4 months) for the ITT population. In 220 cycles, grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 48% of cycles and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 30% of cycles. Neutropenic fever was observed in 18 patients (41%). CONCLUSIONS: Early concurrent CRT, starting from the very beginning of the first cycle of chemotherapy with prolonged oral etoposide and cisplatin failed to show any improvement in survival compared with other CRT regimens.     

A phase I study of gemcitabine/cisplatin/etoposide in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: To define the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity of combined cisplatin, etoposide, and gemcitabine in patients with small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: We undertook a phase I study in patients with either extensive small-cell lung cancer with or without prior chemotherapy, or limited disease who had progressed or recurred despite prior treatment. Patients received cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, etoposide 50-100 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 followed by oral administration of 50-100 mg/m2 days 2 5, and gemcitabine at either 800 or 1000 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8, on a 3 weekly cycle. RESULTS: We treated 20 patients, 14 at the 800 mg/m2 gemcitabine dose level, and six at the 1000 mg/m2 dose level. The protocol initially used an etoposide dose of 100 mg/m2 etoposide daily (i.v. day 1 and orally days 2-5), but the first two patients died of septic complications. With reduction of the etoposide dose to 50 mg/m2 daily x 5, the regimen was well tolerated. At this etoposide dose, neutropenia, mucositis, and gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in one patient at each of the two gemcitabine dose levels. In addition, one patient receiving gemcitabine at the 1000 mg/m2 level experienced a possible allergic reaction. The overall response rate was 54%. Patients on gemcitabine at the 800 mg/m2 level who had not received prior chemotherapy had the highest response rate, at 75%. CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II doses for this regimen are cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, etoposide 50 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 and orally days 2-5, and gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8. Future trials should further examine the optimal relative doses and schedule of gemcitabine and etoposide.     

Mid-course thoracic radiotherapy with cisplatin-etoposide chemotherapy in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer

Combination chemoradiotherapy is a standard treatment for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). However, there is still controversery about the optimal timing of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT). In this study, the outcome of 70 patients who had received TRT at a dose of median 50 Gy (range, 46–60 Gy) with a second or third cycle of chemotherapy (CHT) either concurrently (n=41) or sequentially (n=29) were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were administered a median of five cycles (range, four to six cycles) cisplatin plus etoposide (EP) CHT. Prophylactic cranial radiotherapy was delivered to 30 (43%) patients. The median follow-up for all patients was 15 mo (range, 6–60 mo). The median overall survival was 19 mo in the concurrent arm vs 15 mo in the sequential arm. The 2-yr local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 60%, 19%, and 36%, respectively. The most common toxicity was esophagitis. However, there were no grade 3–4 esophagitis in either arm. Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity, on the other hand, appeared significantly more in the concurrent arm (p<0.001). Mid-course of once-daily TRT at a moderate total dose with CHT failed to show any improvement in survival. Additionally, there were no differences between concurrent and sequential CHT with TRT. However, acceptable toxicity rates support the use of once-daily fractionation to higher total dose of TRT.     

Combination of irinotecan hydrochloride and etoposide for treatment of refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer

We used a combination of irinotecan and etoposide with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as a support therapy for refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This combination regimen was active against refractory or relapsed SCLC as gauged by a response rate of 71% and a median survival time of 271 days. Further studies of this combination regimen in refractory or relapsed SCLC are warranted.     

Influence of tumor response on the survival of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer treated with the etoposide plus cisplatin chemotherapy regimen

Objective In this study, we evaluated the difference of progression-free survival(PFS) and overall survival(OS) between extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer(ES-SCLC) patients who acquired partial response(PR) or complete remission(CR) after two cycles of first-line chemotherapy with the etoposide plus cisplatin(EP) regimen and those who acquired PR or CR after four or six cycles.Methods A total of 106 eligible patients treated with the EP chemotherapy regimen for two to six cycles, at The General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region(China) between November 2004 and May 2011, were enrolled in this study. RECIST version 1.1 was used for the evaluation of chemotherapy efficiency. We followed up all eligible patients every 4 weeks. All statistical data were analyzed by using SPSS 21.0 statistical package for Windows.Results After a median follow-up of 293 days(range, 62–1531 days), all patients had died by the cutoff date. Fifty-one patients acquired PR or CR after two cycles of chemotherapy; the median PFS reached 6.0 months(95% CI, 5.1–6.9), and the median OS was 10.5 months(95% CI, 8.6–12.4). Twenty-eight patients acquired PR or CR after four or six cycles; the median PFS was 4.8 months(95% CI, 4.4–5.2), and the median OS was 7.5 months(95% CI, 6.8–8.2). Both PFS and OS showed a statistical difference between the two groups. Conclusion ES-SCLC patients who acquired PR or CR after two cycles of the EP regimen as first-line therapy had longer PFS and OS than those who acquired PR or CR after four or six cycles.     

Combination chemotherapy with cisplatin, etoposide and gallium chloride for lung cancer: individual adaptation of doses.

Twelve inoperable lung cancer patients were treated with a combination chemotherapy of cisplatinum (CDDP) and etoposide (VP16), as a continuous infusion for 5 days, every 21 days, and with a daily oral administration of GaCl3. Dosages of CDDP and VP16 were adapted in order to obtain an area under the curve (AUC) of 80,000 micrograms l-1.h for plasma total platinum and of 200 mumol.l-1 h for plasma VP16 during each 120 h infusion. GaCl3 was given at the dosage of 400 mg/24h from the time of diagnosis at least until the evaluation after 3 courses of chemotherapy. An objective response was observed in 5 non small cell (NSCLC) lung cancer patients (group 1) and 3 small cell (SCLC) lung cancer patients (group 2). In the other 4 patients with a NSCLC no partial response was noted (group 3). No significant difference in area under the curve (AUC) was noted between the 3 groups, either for plasma total platinum (group 1 = 89,598 +/- 20,843 micrograms l-1.h; group 2 = 88,081 +/- 15,431 micrograms l-1.h; group 3 = 83,820 +/- 13,455 micrograms l-1.h), or for VP16 (group 1 = 227 +/- 41 mumol.l-1 h; group 2 = 217 +/- 29 mumol.l-1.h and group 3 = 211 +/- 30 mumol.l-1.h). The maximal plasma Ga concentrations were 244 +/- 34 micrograms/l in group 1, 112 +/- 57 micrograms/l in group 3 (p less than 0.005) and 243 +/- 132 micrograms/l in group 2. It was then decided to increase the dose of GaCl3 in the further non-responding patients. In 6 responders, 3 additional courses of this combination chemotherapy could have been given without major toxicity, allowing a much more important decrease in the tumor volume in 4 of them. This schedule of treatment should permit the chemotherapy to continue for longer than 6 courses, in order to improve the survival time.     

Combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and vincristine in the treatment of stage III-IV small-cell lung cancer

Twenty patients with histologically confirmed small-cell lung cancer were treated with cyclophosphamide 1000 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, and adriamycin 50 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1. This protocol was repeated every 21 days. Out of 17 evaluable patients 2 obtained a complete response (12%) with a mean duration of 11 months, 4 patients achieved a partial response with a mean duration of 6.3+ months, and 1 had a minimal response of 7.2 months. Two patients had a stabilization which lasted a mean of 4+ months, while 8 patients progressed. Although the mean survival was higher in responders than in non-responders, the difference in survival time was not statistically significant. The treatment was quite well tolerated with hematological toxicity in 78% of cases, oral and gastrointestinal toxicity in 83%, alopecia in 78%, and neurotoxicity in 16% of cases.     

Combination chemotherapy without cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Cisplatin-based combinations are standard regimens in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Survival improvement has been achieved using this therapy. However, the high toxicity induced by cisplatin-based doublets urges the research of alternate treatments. Newest cytotoxic compounds yield a better efficacy-toxicity ratio. Platinum-free doublet regimens based on new drugs are expected to offer the patient an improved survival without decreasing his quality of life. Treatment-allocated time and period with high grade toxicity could be considered as wasted from the patient point of view. QUALY methods based on time without symptoms and toxicity allow the accurate evaluation of this end-point. This brief state-of-the-art deals with methodological statements highlighted by the first publications of randomized studies comparing non-platinum-based doublets with either single-drug chemotherapy or standard cisplatin-based doublets.