The effects of surface roughness and polymethylmethacrylate precoating on the radiographic and clinical results of the Iowa hip prosthesis. A study of patients less than fifty years old

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to compare the results associated with two different surface finishes (bead-blasted and grit-blasted) for Iowa femoral components used in total hip arthroplasties performed between January 1979 and June 1991 in patients who were less than fifty years old. METHODS: Between January 1979 and December 1985, thirty-six primary total hip replacements were performed in twenty-five patients with insertion of a bead-blasted Iowa femoral component (average surface roughness, 0.8 micrometer) with cement and insertion of a titanium-backed acetabular component (thirty-five hips) or non-metal-backed acetabular component (one hip) with cement. Between January 1986 and June 1991, forty-five primary total hip replacements were performed in thirty-seven patients with use of a precoated grit-blasted Iowa femoral component (average surface roughness, 2.1 micrometers) and a Harris-Galante-I porous ingrowth acetabular component (forty-one hips) or an Osteonics component (four hips). The only change in the design of the femoral component (other than the surface finish) between the two consecutive series was the addition of polymethylmethacrylate precoating to the proximal third of all forty-five grit-blasted stems and modularity of the femoral head of the last eight grit-blasted stems. RESULTS: No hip was lost to follow-up. The duration of radiographic follow-up of the hips treated with the bead-blasted component averaged 11.3 years (range, ten to sixteen years) postoperatively, whereas that of the hips treated with the precoated grit-blasted component averaged 8.2 years (range, five to eleven years). Two (6 percent) of the bead-blasted femoral components were revised because of aseptic loosening compared with eight (18 percent) of the precoated grit-blasted components. Four bead-blasted components (11 percent) were either radiographically loose or were revised because of loosening compared with eleven precoated grit-blasted components (24 percent). Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves evaluated with log-rank analysis revealed that the bead-blasted Iowa femoral components were revised because of aseptic loosening (p = 0.0184) and were radiographically loose (p = 0.0068) less often than the precoated grit-blasted Iowa femoral components. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present study have led the senior ones of us to resume using femoral components with a polished surface and fixed with cement.     

Comparison of clinical outcomes in total hip arthroplasty using rough and polished cemented stems with essentially the same geometry

BACKGROUND: Aseptic loosening of the cemented stem is the most common cause of revision of total hip arthroplasties. The loosening is often associated with substantial lysis of the surrounding bone. The surface finish of femoral components is suspected as a contributing factor to this bone lysis. The purpose of this study was to compare the results associated with a rough surface and those associated with a polished surface in a consecutive series of cemented stems with essentially the same geometry. METHODS: The study included 244 consecutive total hip arthroplasties with a cemented femoral component performed by one surgeon. There was no difference in patient selection criteria or surgical techniques between the group treated with a polished stem and that treated with a grit-blasted stem. All arthroplasties were hybrid, with an uncemented acetabular component. Generally, patients were over the age of sixty years (mean age, 70.6 years). The stems inserted in the initial 122 hips had a grit-blasted surface with a roughness of 2.1 microm. The stem surface in the second 122 hips was polished (roughness, 0.1 microm). The results of clinical and radiographic assessments performed immediately after surgery were compared with those performed at the most recent visit. The average duration of clinical follow-up for the patients treated with the grit-blasted and polished stems was 5.98 years and 5.32 years, respectively. RESULTS: Four hips treated with the grit-blasted stem had aseptic loosening with substantial surrounding lysis and required revision. An additional two hips in this group had radiographic evidence of substantial lysis and were judged to have an impending need for revision. In contrast, no hip treated with the polished stem required revision, and only one had minimal lysis. This difference regarding failures and impending failures was significant (p = 0.05). The clinical results were comparable, with an Iowa hip rating of 98 points at the time of follow-up in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant difference between grit-blasted and polished stems with respect to the prevalence of revisions and impending revisions, all of which were identified in a relatively short follow-up period. The results in this series favor the use of a polished stem when cement is employed for fixation of the femoral component.     

Hybrid total hip arthroplasty in patients under the age of fifty: A five- to ten-year follow-up

In 37 patients, 45 total hip replacements were performed using contemporary cementing techniques, an uncemented Harris-Galante I acetabular component and a cemented precoated Iowa femoral component in patients under the age of 50 at the time of their surgery; 36 patients with 43 hybrid hips were living, 1 patient with 2 hybrid hips was decreased. No patients were lost to follow-up. At 5- to 10-year follow-up, eight hips were revised for aseptic loosening. No acetabular components, and eight femoral components (18%) were revised for aseptic loosening. When looking at radiographic results, including revision as well as those components that were probably or definitely loose on radiographs, 0 acetabular components and 11 femoral components (24%) were radiographically loose. These results demonstrate the excellent durability of the uncemented Harris-Galante acetabular component in the younger patient. However, the Iowa grit-blasted methyl methacrylate precoated femoral component had a magnitude increase in the prevalence of revision for aseptic femoral loosening when compared to the senior author's long-term Charnley results in this age group. The authors attribute the failure to the rough surface finish applied to the femoral component. However, the polymethyl methacrylate proximal precoating and the femoral component design may also contribute to the femoral failures.     

Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested that cemented femoral components with a polished surface may provide superior long-term fixation when compared with femoral components with a roughened surface. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of total hip arthroplasty with a cemented femoral component with a polished surface finish and compare them with the results of total hip arthroplasty performed with a similar design of cemented femoral component with a rougher surface finish. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive group of 132 patients (149 hips) in whom primary total hip arthroplasty had been performed by one surgeon using a cemented collared femoral component with a polished (0.1-microm Ra) surface finish and a cementless acetabular component. Ninety-eight patients (115 hips) were followed for a minimum of ten years. We compared the survivorship of this prosthesis with that of a femoral component of similar design but with rougher surfaces (matte or grit-blasted). RESULTS: No polished stems were revised because of aseptic loosening or demonstrated radiographic evidence of loosening; however, eight hips (5.4%) with a polished stem demonstrated osteolysis distal to the greater or lesser tro-chanter. In contrast, six stems (2.0%) with a matte surface finish of 0.8-microm Ra were revised because of aseptic loosening, and an additional five stems were seen to be loose radiographically. Eleven stems (9.2%) with a grit-blasted surface finish of 2.1-microm Ra were revised because of aseptic loosening, and an additional four stems were seen to be loose radiographically. The difference in the prevalence of revision due to aseptic loosening between the group with the 0.1-microm Ra surface and the group with the 2.1-microm Ra surface was significant (p = 0.001), as was the difference between the prevalence of revision due to aseptic loosening between the group with the 0.8-microm Ra surface and the group with the 2.1-microm Ra surface (p = 0.001). No cups were revised because of aseptic loosening, and one hip had radiographic signs of acetabular loosening. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated excellent durability of a prosthesis consisting of a cemented, collared, polished femoral component and a cementless acetabular component. While no hips were revised because of aseptic loosening, distal femoral osteolysis was observed in eight hips (5.4%), a higher prevalence than has been reported by others after similar durations of follow-up of tapered, collarless, polished femoral components.     

Ten-year results of uncemented hip stems for failed intertrochanteric osteotomy

Introduction Inferior survival of cemented total hip arthroplasty has been reported after previous femoral osteotomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term survival of uncemented stems after femoral osteotomy.Materials and methods Forty-eight hips in 45 patients had undergone conversion THA for a failed intertrochanteric osteotomy of the hip after a mean of 12 years (2–33 years). Mean time of follow-up was 11 years (5–15 years).Results At follow-up, two patients (three hips) had died, and one patient (one hip) was not located. Three patients (three hips) underwent femoral revision—one for infection and two for aseptic loosening of the stem. Survival of the stem was 94% at 10 years, and survival with femoral revision for aseptic loosening as an end point was 96%. The median Harris Hip Score at follow-up was 80 points. Radiolucent lines in Gruen zones 1 and 7 were present in 14 and 18% of hips, respectively. Radiolucencies in other zones were not detected. There was no radiographic evidence of femoral osteolysis, stress-shielding or loosening.Conclusion The results with this type of uncemented tapered titanium femoral component after proximal femoral osteotomy are encouraging and compare to those achieved in patients with regular femoral anatomy.     

Acetabular revision after failed total hip arthroplasty in patients with congenital hip dislocation and dysplasia. Results after a mean of 8.6 years

BACKGROUND: Revision of a total hip arthroplasty in a patient who has had congenital hip dysplasia or dislocation is often more difficult than a standard revision operation. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and complications of use of a cementless hemispherical acetabular component for revision of an acetabular component of a failed total hip replacement in patients whose initial problem was arthritis secondary to congenital dislocation or dysplasia. The mean duration of follow-up was approximately eight years. METHODS: We reviewed a consecutive series of sixty-one hips in fifty-three patients who underwent a cementless acetabular revision with use of a hemispherical acetabular component, with or without concurrent femoral revision. Data were collected prospectively. The mean age of the patients at the time of the index operation was fifty-six years. A mean of 1.9 ipsilateral hip operations had been performed previously. Thirty-nine hips (64 percent) had a so-called high hip center prior to the index revision. With one exception, the uncemented acetabular component was fixed with screws. Fifty-one acetabular components were placed with so-called line-to-line fit, and ten were oversized by one to three millimeters. In thirty-eight hips, the femoral component was revised as well. Twenty-nine femora were reconstructed with use of a cemented device, and nine were revised with an uncemented patch-porous-coated femoral stem (a stem on which the porous coating appears in patches). RESULTS: Four patients (five hips) died prior to the five-year minimum follow-up interval. With the exception of one hip treated with resection arthroplasty because of deep infection, none of the hips in these deceased patients had been revised or had a loose component. One living patient (one hip) had a resection arthroplasty, and one additional patient (two hips) had both stable acetabular components rerevised at the time of femoral rerevision at another institution because of loosening and osteolysis. One patient refused to return for follow-up, but the components had not been revised. The remaining fifty-two hips in forty-six patients were followed for a mean of 8.6 years (range, 5.0 to 12.7 years). The mean Harris hip score was 80 points (range, 56 to 100 points) at the time of the latest follow-up. No acetabular component had been revised, although two had migrated. No other acetabular component was loose according to our radiographic criteria. Thus, the mechanical failure rate on the acetabular side was 3 percent (two of sixty-one) for the entire series and 4 percent (two of fifty-two) for the patients who had been followed for a mean of 8.6 years. On the femoral side, the mechanical failure rate was 3 percent (one of twenty-nine) for the cemented stems and six of nine for the uncemented patch-porous-coated stems. CONCLUSIONS: Of the approaches used in this difficult series of patients requiring revision, the hybrid arthroplasty (a cementless acetabular component and a cemented femoral component) yielded overall good results after an intermediate duration of follow-up.     

Precoated femoral component in primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty: results at a mean 10-year follow-up

This is a mid-term report at 10 years' mean follow-up of a study of a precoated femoral component used in primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty (THA). Of an original cohort of 98 hips undergoing THA performed by one surgeon, 75 hips in 65 patients (mean age, 67 years) were prospectively followed up for 7 to 12 years (mean, 10 years). All hips had the same porous coated acetabular component and a precoated femoral component (with an oval cross-section) implanted using Simplex bone cement (Howmedica, Rutherford, NJ). There was no femoral component loosening or revision. Two acetabular components in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and protrusio acetabulae had radiographic loosening; however, only 1 was symptomatic and was revised. Acetabular osteolysis was seen in 4 hips (5.3%), and minor femoral osteolysis was seen in 3 hips (4%). Used in this manner in this patient population, precoating is not detrimental to successful fixation at 10 years' mean follow-up of primary hybrid THA.     

Results of a cemented straight titanium alloy femoral stem after mean follow-up of 13 years

The first consecutive series of 250 implantations of a cemented femoral shaft prosthesis made of titanium alloy (Bicontact®, Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) in 239 patients are included in this prospective follow-up study. Average time of follow-up evaluation was 12.6 years (range 11.8–13.8 years). At follow-up, 116 patients with 112 hips have died and only two could not be located. Follow-up rate was 99.2% for the patients still alive at time of follow-up evaluation. Eight patients have been revised, two for infection, one for aseptic loosening of a varus-malaligned stem and two for aseptic loosening in cases with osteolysis; two radiologically well-fixed stems had been revised during acetabular revision. Two additional stems were regarded loose according to radiologic criteria. Survival estimate (with revision as an endpoint) showed a calculated cumulative survival rate of 95.8% after 14 years [confidence limits: 98.0% (upper) and 91.4% (lower)]. The average HARRIS hip score at time of follow-up was 77.3 points. Radiologically, signs of loosening could be detected in two stems: in both cases osteolyses developed together with significant polyethylene wear. One of these patients experienced severe pain, so an indication for revision is given, the other has only mild pain and revision had not been indicated so far. In conclusion, the long-term follow-up results with this cemented titanium femoral component are encouraging and are comparable to other successful cemented femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty. No increased risk for aseptical loosening was associated with the combination of titanium and cement in this specific stem.     

Total hip replacement with a cementless acetabular component and a cemented femoral component in patients younger than fifty years of age

BACKGROUND: We have been using hybrid total hip arthroplasty (a cementless acetabular component and a cemented stem) in young patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of aseptic loosening, polyethylene wear, and osteolysis after the use of this technique. METHODS: We studied a prospective consecutive series of sixty-four primary hybrid total hip replacements in fifty-five patients younger than fifty years old. There were forty-three men and twelve women; the average age at the time of the index operation was 43.4 years. The average duration of follow-up was 9.4 years. We used a cementless acetabular component without screw-holes and a cemented femoral component with a 22-mm head in all hips. Clinical follow-up with use of Harris hip ratings and radiographic follow-up were performed at six weeks; at three, six, and twelve months; and yearly thereafter. The sequential annual linear and volumetric wear rates were measured, and bone-remodeling and osteolysis were assessed. RESULTS: The mean preoperative Harris hip score was 44 points, which increased to 95 points at the time of final follow-up. No hip had aseptic loosening. One hip (2%) was revised because of late infection. The average linear wear (and standard deviation) was 0.96 +/- 0.066 mm, with an average annual rate of 0.096 +/- 0.013 mm. The average volumetric wear was 364.7 +/- 25.2 mm (3), with an average annual rate of 43.4 +/- 3.5 mm (3). Six hips (9%) had an osteolytic lesion of <1 cm in diameter in the calcar femorale (zone 7). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that a hybrid arthroplasty with a cementless acetabular component and a smooth cemented femoral component (Ra, 0.6 mm) is effective for primary total hip replacement in young patients. Although there was no aseptic loosening and a low prevalence of osteolysis at the latest follow-up evaluation, the high rates of linear and volumetric wear of the polyethylene liner in these young patients remain a concern.     

No increased stem subsidence after arthroplasty in young patients with femoral head osteonecrosis: 41 patients followed for 1-9 years

BACKGROUND: Poor bone stock in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head may be a reason for poor outcome after hip replacement. One way of studying bone quality is to measure implant migration. We thus investigated the clinical and radiographic results of cementless THR in younger patients with femoral head osteonecrosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied hips in 41 patients (mean age 48 (25-63) years) with a cementless hip arthroplasty after late stage osteonecrosis. Clinical evaluation was by the Harris hip score, the WOMAC score and the SF-36 score. Stem subsidence was measured with the Ein Bild Roentgen Analyse femoral component analysis (EBRA-FCA) at 3, 12, 24, 60, and 72 months after operation. The average duration of follow-up was 7(1-9) years, with less than 2 years for 2 patients. RESULTS: There was no revision of any hip. No radiographic or clinical stem loosening was seen. After 60 months, the cementless stems showed a median subsidence of -0.7 mm (95% CI: -0.9 to -0.2). No femoral osteolysis occurred. Femoral radiolucent lines, all < 1 mm, were seen in 10 hips. At the latest follow-up the Harris hip score was 83 (23-100) points. INTERPRETATION: Our findings for porous-coated stems in patients with femoral osteonecrosis indicate no greater risk of stem subsidence and rate of osteolysis after an average of 7 years follow-up. Thus, we continue to use uncemented stems in younger patients with femoral osteonecrosis. However, continued follow-up will be necessary to evaluate the long-term outcome.     

初次混合式全髋关节置换术骨水泥柄的生存率分析

目的 探讨骨水泥柄全髋关节置换术后中期临床疗效.方法 接受骨水泥柄髋关节置换患者148例167髋,男95例106髋,女53例61髋;年龄28~87岁,平均62.8岁;体重45.2~87.4 kg,平均57.2 kg;身高146~184cm,平均161.5cm;平均体重指数21.4.临床疗效以Harris评分为标准,根据影像学资料评估股骨柄假体位置、骨水泥壳、假体周围骨重塑和骨溶解发生情况.以股骨假体无菌性松动和任何原因所致的假体翻修为终点,对假体生存率采用Kaplan-Meier分析.结果 106例114髋获得随访,随访时间6.5~9.5年,平均8.1年.术前Harris评分8~54分,平均42分;末次随访时76~100分,平均94分.无一例发生无菌性松动及假体翻修.6髋假体柄平均下沉1.83mm.16髋(14%)股骨侧出现<1mm的影像学透亮线,9髋(8%)Gruen Ⅰ区和Ⅶ区出现局灶性骨溶解所致斑点样影像学透亮区.106髋(93%)股骨侧有不同程度的皮质变薄或皮质松质骨化,均位于Ⅶ区.假体生存率为100%(95%可信区间.0.95-1.00).结论 采用第三代骨水泥技术固定股骨柄,可取得较好中期临床效果,但仍存在骨溶解、股骨近端皮质骨吸收重塑等潜在问题.     

No increased stem subsidence after arthroplasty in young patients with femoral head osteonecrosis:41 patients followed for 1–9 years

Background?Poor bone stock in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head may be a reason for poor outcome after hip replacement. One way of studying bone quality is to measure implant migration. We thus investigated the clinical and radiographic results of cementless THR in younger patients with femoral head osteonecrosis.

Patients and methods?We studied hips in 41 patients (mean age 48 (25–63) years) with a cementless hip arthroplasty after late stage osteonecrosis. Clinical evaluation was by the Harris hip score, the WOMAC score and the SF-36 score. Stem subsidence was measured with the Ein Bild Roentgen Analyse femoral component analysis (EBRA-FCA) at 3, 12, 24, 60, and 72 months after operation. The average duration of follow-up was 7(1–9) years, with less than 2 years for 2 patients.

Results?There was no revision of any hip. No radiographic or clinical stem loosening was seen. After 60 months, the cementless stems showed a median subsidence of –0.7?mm (95% CI: –0.9 to –0.2). No femoral osteolysis occurred. Femoral radiolucent lines, all < 1?mm, were seen in 10 hips. At the latest follow-up the Harris hip score was 83 (23–100) points.

Interpretation?Our findings for porous-coated stems in patients with femoral osteonecrosis indicate no greater risk of stem subsidence and rate of osteolysis after an average of 7 years follow-up. Thus, we continue to use uncemented stems in younger patients with femoral osteonecrosis. However, continued follow-up will be necessary to evaluate the long-term outcome.     

Total Hip Arthroplasty With an Uncemented Tapered Femoral Component in Patients Younger than 50 Years

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the outcome of primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years using the Taperloc (Biomet, Warsaw, Ind) femoral component. We evaluated 94 hips in 79 patients at a mean follow-up of 16 years (range, 11-18.5 years). The average age of the patients at the time of surgery was 36 years (range, 20-49 years). Three femoral components had been revised, none for aseptic loosening. Complete clinical and radiographic follow-up was obtained on the 91 hips that had not undergone femoral component revision. The mean Harris hip score increased from 54 points (range, 20-72) before surgery to 93 points (range, 68-100) at the time of this review. Radiographically, 89 stems (98%) were determined to have fixation by bone ingrowth, 2 (2%) demonstrated stable fibrous ingrowth, and no femoral component was loose. Distal femoral osteolysis was identified in 1 hip (1%). These findings indicate that excellent clinical and radiographic results can be achieved in young patients with the Taperloc femoral component at a mean follow-up of 16 years.     

Results of porous-coated anatomic total hip arthroplasty without cement at fifteen years: a concise follow-up of a previous report

The purpose of this study was to update the results of a prospective series of primary cementless total hip arthroplasties after a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up. It is one of the first studies of cementless total hip arthroplasties followed for a minimum of fifteen years. One hundred consecutive Porous Coated Anatomic (PCA) total hip replacements were implanted between October 1983 and January 1986. Fifty-five patients (sixty-four hips) that were alive at a minimum of fifteen years postoperatively are the focus of the present study. At this time of follow-up, at an average of 15.6 years (range, fifteen to seventeen years) after the total hip arthroplasty, 17% (seventeen hips) of the entire cohort and 23% (fifteen hips) of the living cohort had undergone revision because of loosening of the acetabular component or osteolysis. Seven percent (seven hips) of the entire cohort and 6% (four hips) of the living cohort had undergone revision for loosening of the femoral component or osteolysis. Only four femoral stems had been revised for isolated loosening (without osteolysis). The PCA femoral component proved to be durable at a minimum of fifteen years postoperatively, while the acetabular component was less durable.     

20-year experience with cemented primary and conversion total hip arthroplasty using so-called second-generation cementing techniques in patients aged 50 years or younger

We present the 20-year experience of 47 hips in 40 patients aged 50 years or younger with cemented primary total hip arthroplasty using second-generation femoral cementing techniques. Average follow-up duration in the 23 patients living at least 17 years was 18.2 years. Overall, 18 hips (38%) had components revised or removed for any reason, at an average duration of 12.6 years. Every revision or reoperation involved removing the acetabular component. Of these 18 acetabular components, 15 (32%) were revised for aseptic loosening. Eleven additional acetabular components were loose by radiographic criteria at final follow-up, yielding prevalence of aseptic acetabular loosening (55%). Four femoral components (8%) were revised for osteolysis without loosening, and 3 (6%) were revised for aseptic loosening. Femoral osteolysis, with or without component loosening, led to revision in 5 ( 11%) hips compared with 6% for aseptic loosening alone. Osteolysis was the primary problem leading to acetabular and femoral component revision in this series of people < or = 50 years old over the first 20 years after the index operation.     

The Exeter Universal stem: a minimum ten-year review from an independent centre

We reviewed 142 consecutive primary total hip replacements implanted into 123 patients between 1988 and 1993 using the Exeter Universal femoral stem. A total of 74 patients (88 hips) had survived for ten years or more and were reviewed at a mean of 12.7 years (10 to 17). There was no loss to follow-up. The rate of revision of the femoral component for aseptic loosening and osteolysis was 1.1% (1 stem), that for revision for any cause was 2.2% (2 stems), and for re-operation for any cause was 21.6% (19 hips). Re-operation was because of failure of the acetabular component in all but two hips. All but one femoral component subsided within the cement mantle to a mean of 1.52 mm (0 to 8.3) at the final follow-up. One further stem had subsided excessively (8 mm) and had lucent lines at the cement-stem and cement-bone interfaces. This was classified as a radiological failure and is awaiting revision. One stem was revised for deep infection and one for excessive peri-articular osteolysis. Defects of the cement mantle (Barrack grade C and D) were found in 28% of stems (25 hips), associated with increased subsidence (p = 0.01), but were not associated with endosteal lysis or failure. Peri-articular osteolysis was significantly related to the degree of polyethylene wear (p < 0.001), which was in turn associated with a younger age (p = 0.01) and male gender (p < 0.001). The use of the Exeter metal-backed acetabular component was a notable failure with 12 of 32 hips (37.5%) revised for loosening. The Harris-Galante components failed with excessive wear, osteolysis and dislocation with 15% revised (5 of 33 hips). Only one of 23 hips with a cemented Elite component (4%) was revised for loosening and osteolysis. Our findings show that the Exeter Universal stem implanted outside the originating centre has excellent medium-term results.     

Good survival of uncemented tapered stems for failed intertrochanteric osteotomy: a mean 16 year follow-up study in 45 patients

Introduction  Inferior survival of cemented total hip arthroplasty has been reported after previous femoral osteotomy. We previously presented 5–15 years results of uncemented femoral stems for this subgroup of patients. The purpose of the present study was to re-evaluate that same patient group at 10–20 years follow-up. Materials and methods  Forty-eight hips in 45 patients had undergone conversion THA for a failed intertrochanteric osteotomy of the hip after a mean of 12 years (2–33 years). Mean time of follow-up was 16 years (10–20 years). Results  At the latest follow-up five patients had died (five hips), and one patient (one hip) remained lost to follow-up. Compared to the previous evaluation, one more patient required femoral revision for aseptic loosening giving a total of four patients (four hips) with femoral revision––one for infection and three for aseptic loosening of the stem. Survival of the stem was 91% at 15 and 20 years respectively; survival with femoral revision for aseptic loosening as an end point was 93%. The median Harris-Hip-Score at final follow-up was 76 points (previously 80 points). Radiolucent lines in Gruen zones 1 and 7 were present in 20 and 17% of hips, respectively. Radiolucencies in other zones were not detected. There was no radiographic evidence of femoral osteolysis, stress-shielding or loosening. Conclusion  The long-term results with this type of uncemented tapered titanium femoral component after proximal femoral osteotomy remain encouraging and compare favorably to those achieved in patients with regular femoral anatomy. This paper has not been under consideration by any other journal. All authors equally contributed to this paper.     

Femoral component revision using extensively porous-coated cementless stem

The number of revision hip arthroplasty increasesannually. Because of the loss of proximal femoralbone stock, femoral component revision is still achallenging problem for orthopedic surgeons. In mostcases, the femoral stem should be supported byremaining host bone for avoiding the need for structuralallografts. Previous results of cemented or proximalcoated implant for arthroplasty revision are notencouraging because the remaining bone is frequentlysclerotic and smooth.1-6The extensively porou…     

Cementless Spotorno tapered titanium stems

We evaluated the clinical and radiographic results of the first consecutive 154 implantations of a cementless, double-tapered straight femoral stem (cementless Spotorno (CLS), Sulzer Orthopedics) in 141 patients under the age of 55 (mean 47 (13-55)) years. After a mean follow-up of 12 (10-15) years, 11 patients (11 hips) had died and 7 (7 hips) could not be located. 5 patients (5 hips) underwent femoral revision—1 for infection, 1 for periprosthetic fracture and 3 for aseptic loosening of the stem. The overall survival rate of the stem was 97% at 12 years (95% confidence limits, 93%-100%), and survival with femoral revision for aseptic loosening as an end point 98 (95-100)%. The survival rate of the acetabular components was 78 (71-85) % after 12 years. The median Harris hip score at follow-up was 84 points. None of the patients had thigh pain. Radiolucent lines in Gruen regions 1 and 7 were present in 21 hips (17%). 2 hips had radiolucent lines in regions 2-6 on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs. No femoral osteolysis was detected.

The mid- to long-term survival with this type of femoral component is excellent and compares favorably with cemented stems in this age group. However, the high rate of cup loosening and the low Harris hip scores are a concern in this subgroup of young patients.     

Fifteen-year Results of Precoated Femoral Stem in Primary Hybrid Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

There has been controversy whether methylmethacrylate precoating of the cemented femoral stem is a solution for aseptic loosening or rather contributes to increased failure rates in cemented total hip arthroplasties.

Methods

On a retrospective basis, we analyzed 76 primary hybrid total hip arthroplasties from 63 patients with precoated, cemented femoral stems between October 1990 and December 1995. The mean age of the patients was 46.8 years (range, 22 to 77 years) with a minimum follow-up of 14 years (mean, 15.5 years; range, 14 to 19.5 years). Third generation cementing techniques were employed in all cases.

Results

Twenty-four out of 76 cases (31.6%) showed aseptic loosening of the femoral stems, of which 23 stems were revised at an average revision time of 8 years (range, 3 to 14.8 years). The main mode of loosening was cement-stem interface failure in 22 hips (91.7%). Twenty-one out of 24 failed hips (87.5%) demonstrated C2 cementing grades (p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis using radiographic aseptic loosening of the femoral stem as the endpoint for failure showed survival rates of 76.5% at 10 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 71.4 to 81.6) and 63.2% at 19 years (95% CI, 57.3 to 69.1).

Conclusions

An early failure of the precoated femoral stem in this study was mainly due to an insufficient cementing technique. Achievement of good cement mantle may improve the survival rates.