Successful Slow Pathway Ablation in a Patient with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Having a Proximal Common Pathway

Radiofrequency catheter ablation was attempted in a patient with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). AVNRT was easily inducible but an intermittent loss of the atrial activation was observed during AVNRT suggesting the presence of a proximal common pathway. During sinus rhythm, a relatively delayed activation that was compatible with a slow potential, was recorded anterior to the ostium of coronary sinus, and radiofrequency catheter ablation application (20 watts) to the site induced junction tachycardia. After an additional radiofrequency catheter ablation application to close the site, AVNRT became noninducible without deterioration of atrioventricular conduction through a fast pathway. This is the first case in which radiofrequency catheter ablation application to the slow potential recording site has been successful, even in AVNRT having a proximal common pathway.     

The effect of ibutilide on retrograde accessory pathway conduction

Ibutilide is a compound with Class III effects marketed for rapid conversion of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. The Class III effect is primarily mediated by blockade of the rapid component of the cardiac delayed rectifier of potassium current, Ikr. Ibutilide was used in three patients with concealed accessory pathways during electrophysiological evaluation for ablation of symptomatic atrioventricular reentry tachycardia. Each pathway (mid-septal, left posterior, and left lateral) exhibited a mean retrograde effective refractory period of 240 +/- 20 ms. Each patient had atrioventricular reentry tachycardia that consistently degenerated to recurrent sustained atrial fibrillation. One to two milligrams of intravenous ibutilide converted atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm and maintained sinus rhythm throughout the procedure. Retrograde accessory pathway conduction was unchanged. Maintenance of sinus rhythm allowed for successful mapping and catheter ablation of the concealed accessory pathways. No direct current cardioversion was needed. In these patients, ibutilide was effective in converting and controlling atrial fibrillation induced by atrioventricular reentry tachycardia without masking retrograde pathway conduction. Antegrade accessory pathway conduction could not be assessed in this study.     

Fast pathway ablation using cryotherapy for a patient with a long PR interval in sinus rhythm and AVNRT

A 53-year-old man with previous aortic valve surgery presented with paroxysmal narrow complex tachycardia, induced by exercise. His PR interval was greater than 400 ms when in sinus rhythm and atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) was diagnosed with invasive electrophysiological studies. Single echoes were repeatedly inducible with single-paced extrastimuli. Cryotherapy was then used to ablate the fast pathway using single echoes to monitor anterograde slow pathway and retrograde fast pathway function during ablation.     

Nonreentrant Supraventricular Tachycardia Due to Simultaneous Conduction Over Fast and Slow AV Node Pathways: Successful Treatment with Radiofrequency Ablation

A 55-year-old woman with frequent problematic supraventricular tachycardia is presented. The tachycardia was irregular with predominately normal QRS morphology and was refractory to multiple antiarrhythmic drugs. At electrophysiology study, the tachycardia was inducible with atrial or ventricular extrastimuli and dual pathways were observed. In contrast to the situation usually seen with dual atrioventricular node physiology, the slow pathway had a longer effective refractory period than the fast pathway and reentrant tachycardia was not induced. Simultaneous conduction over the fast and slow pathways during sinus rhythm was shown to be the mechanism for clinical tachycardia. The tachycardia was successfully treated using radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway.     

Atrial Ectopy Originating from the Posteroinferior Atrium During Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Atrial ectopy sometimes appears during RF ablation of the slow pathway in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). However, its origin, characteristics, and significance are still unclear. To examine these issues, we analyzed 67 consecutive patients with AVNRT (60 with slow-fast AVNRT and 7 with fast-slow AVNRT), which was successfully eliminated by RF ablation to the sites with a slow potential in 63 patients and with the earliest activations of retrograde slow pathway conduction in 4 patients. During successful RF ablation, junctional ectopy with the activation sequence showing H-A-V at the His-bundle region appeared in 52 patients (group A) and atrial ectopy with negative P waves in the inferior leads preceding the QRS and the activation sequence showing A-H-V at the His-bundle region appeared in 15 patients (group B). Atrial ectopy was associated with (10 patients) or without junctional ectopy (5 patients). Before RF ablation, retrograde slow pathway conduction induced during ventricular burst and/or extrastimulus pacing was more frequently demonstrated in group B than in group A (9/15 [60%] vs 1/52 [2%], P < 0.001). Successful ablation site in group A was distributed between the His-bundle region and coronary sinus ostium, while that in group B was confined mostly to the site anterior to the coronary sinus ostium. In group B, atrial ectopy also appeared in 21% of the unsuccessful RF ablations. In conclusion, atrial ectopy is relatively common during slow pathway ablation and observed in 8% of RF applications overall and 22% of RF applications that successfully eliminated inducible AVNRT. Atrial ectopy appears to be closely related to successful slow pathway ablation among patients with manifest retrograde slow pathway function.     

Narrow Complex Tachycardia with VA Block: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications

To review our experience with cases of narrow complex tachycardia with VA block, highlighting the difficulties in the differential diagnosis, and the therapeutic implications. Prior reports of patients with narrow complex tachycardia with VA block consist of isolated case reports. The differential diagnosis of this disorder includes: automatic junctional tachycardia, AV nodal reentry with final upper common pathway block, concealed nodofascicular (ventricular) pathway, and intra-Hissian reentry. Between June 1994 and January 1996, six patients with narrow complex tachycardia with episodes of ventriculoatrial block were referred for evaluation. All six patients underwent attempted radiofrequency ablation of the putative arrhythmic site. Three of six patients had evidence suggestive of a nodofascicular tract. Intermittent antegrade conduction over a left-sided nodofascicular tract was present in two patients and the diagnosis of a concealed nodofascicular was made in the third patient after ruling out other tachycardia mechanisms. Two patients had automatic junctional tachycardia, and one patient had atroventricular nodal reentry with proximal common pathway block. Attempted ablation in the posterior and mid-septum was unsuccessful in patients with nodofascicular tachycardia. In contrast, those with atrioventricular nodal reentry and automatic junctional tachycardia readily responded to ablation. The presence of a nodofascicular tachycardia should be suspected if: (1) intermittent antegrade preexcitation is recorded, (2) the tachycardia can be initiated with a single atrial premature producing two ventricular complexes, and (3) a single ventricular extrastimulus initiates SVT without a retrograde His deflection. The presence of a nodofascicular pathway is common in patients with narrow complex tachycardia and VA block. Unlike AV nodal reentry and automatic junctional tachycardia, the response to ablation is poor.     

Effect of Pacing Site on the Atrial Electrogram at Target Sites for Slow Pathway Ablation in Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Atrial electrograms recorded from target sites during radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathway are often fractionated and may be associated with a late, high frequency component (the slow pathway potential). The purpose of the current study was to assess the effects of slow pathway ablation on the morphology of the atrial electrogram and to determine whether target site electrograms display direction dependent changes in morphology during atrial pacing maneuvers. Twenty-six patients with typical AV nodal reentry had electrograms recorded from target sites before and after successful ablation of the slow A V nodal path way and during pacing from the high right atrium and distal coronary sin us at cycle lengths of 500 and 300 msec. There was no significant change in the duration or degree of fractionation of the atrial electrogram as the result of slow pathway ablation. In contrast, the duration and degree of fractionation were less when pacing from the coronary sinus compared with sinus rhythms or right atrial pacing. Pacing rate did not affect electrogram morphology. These data suggest that the morphology of the slow pathway target site electrogram is dependent on the direction of atrial activation and that the "slow pathway potential" does not represent activation of an anatomically discrete pathway.     

Electrophysiological characteristics of junctional rhythm during ablation of the slow pathway in different types of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND: Junctional rhythm (JR) is commonly observed during radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the slow pathway for atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia. However, the atrial activation pattern and conduction time from the His-bundle region to the atria recorded during JR in different types of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia have not been fully defined. METHODS: Forty-five patients who underwent RF ablation of the slow pathway for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia were included; 27 patients with slow-fast, 11 patients with slow-intermediate, and 7 patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. The atrial activation pattern and HA interval (from the His-bundle potential to the atrial recording of the high right atrial catheter) during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (HA(SVT)) and JR (HA(JR)) were analyzed. RESULTS: In all patients with slow-fast AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the atrial activation sequence recorded during JR was similar to that of the retrograde fast pathway, and transient retrograde conduction block during JR was found in 1 (4%) patient. The HA(JR) was significantly shorter than the HA(SVT) (57 +/- 24 vs 68 +/- 21 ms, P < 0.01). In patients with slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the atrial activation sequence of the JR was similar to that of the retrograde fast pathway in 5 (45%), and to that of the retrograde intermediate pathway in 6 (55%) patients. Transient retrograde conduction block during JR was noted in 1 (9%) patient. The HA(JR) was also significantly shorter than the HA(SVT) (145 +/- 27 vs 168 +/- 29 ms, P = 0.014). In patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, retrograde conduction with block during JR was noted in 7 (100%) patients. The incidence of retrograde conduction block during JR was higher in fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia than slow-fast (7/7 vs 1/11, P < 0.01) and slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (7/7 vs 1/27, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with slow-fast and slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the JR during ablation of the slow pathway conducted to the atria through the fast or intermediate pathway. In patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, there was no retrograde conduction during JR. These findings suggested there were different characteristics of the JR during slow-pathway ablation of different types of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.     

Frequency of spontaneous and inducible atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia in patients with idiopathic outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the frequency of spontaneous or inducible atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) in patients referred for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of idiopathic outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias. BACKGROUND: In patients with no obvious heart disease, AVNRT and outflow tract ventricular tachycardia (VT) are the most frequently encountered supraventricular and ventricular tachycardias, respectively. An increased coexistence of the two arrhythmias has been recently suggested. METHODS: In 68 consecutive patients referred for RFA of an idiopathic ventricular outflow tract arrhythmia, a stimulation protocol including repeated bursts of rapid atrial pacing, up to triple atrial extrastimuli during sinus rhythm and rapid ventricular pacing was performed before and after isoproterenol infusion following RFA of the ventricular arrhythmia. In patients with inducible AVNRT, RFA of the slow pathway was performed. RESULTS: Of the 68 study patients, 17 (25%) had either spontaneous AVNRT documented prior to RFA of the ventricular arrhythmia (n = 4) or inducible AVNRT at the time of RFA of the ventricular arrhythmia (n = 13). AVNRT was induced by atrial pacing in 15 (88%) of 17 patients: in 3 patients without isoproterenol and in 12 patients during isoproterenol infusion. Uncomplicated RFA of the slow pathway was successfully achieved in all patients with inducible AVNRT. CONCLUSION: Spontaneous or inducible AVNRT is relatively common in patients with idiopathic outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias. Atrial stimulation, especially when performed after isoproterenol infusion plays a major role in AVNRT inducibility. Although we performed RFA of the slow pathway in patients with inducible AVNRT and no prior tachycardia documentation, the question whether this is mandatory remains unsettled.     

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for AV Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Associated with Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava

Slow A V nodal pathway ablation using RF is highly effective for patients with refractory A V nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). We report three catheter ablation cases using RF current in patients associated with persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC). Three patients with drug refractory AVNHT of common variety were involved in this study. An electrode catheter introduced through the left subclavian vein inserted directly into the coronary sinus, a typical anatomical finding of PLSVC. The ablation procedure was initially performed at the posteroinferior region of Koch's triangle. A slow pathway potential could not be found from that area; nonsustained junctional tachycardia (NSJT) did not occur during the delivery of RF current; there was failure to eliminate slow AV nodal pathway conduction. The catheter then was moved into the bed of the proximal portion of the markedly enlarged coronary sinus. A slow AV nodal pathway potential was recorded through the ablation catheter, and the delivery of RF current caused NSJT in two patients. Complete elimination of slow AV nodal pathway conduction was accomplished in these two patients by this method. No adverse effects were provoked by this procedure. Catheter ablation of the slow A V nodal pathway guided by a slow pathway potential and the appearance of NSJT was feasible and safe in the area of the coronary sinus ostium in patients associated with PLSVC.     

Electrophysiological Behavior of Atrioventricular Node After Selective Fast or Slow Pathway Ablation in Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

One hundred twenty consecutive patients with symptomatic atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) underwent catheter ablation using radiofrequency energy. Fast pathway ablation was attempted in the first 16 consecutive patients by application of radiofrequency current in the anterior and superior aspect of the tricuspid annulus. Successful results were accomplished in 13 patients, complete atrioventricular (AV) block occurred in three. One hundred four patients underwent ablation of the slow pathway in the posterior and inferior aspect of the tricuspid annulus, which was successful in 98 patients. The remaining six patients subsequently underwent a fast pathway ablation with successful results in four and AV block in two. Therefore. 102 (98%) of the last 104 patients became free of AVNRT while maintaining intact AV conduction. This study characterizes the electrophysiological properties of the residual AV node following a selective fast or slow pathway ablation.     

Analysis of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia with Variable Ventriculoatrial Block: Characteristics of the Upper Common Pathway

Background: The precise nature of the upper turnaround part of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is not entirely understood.
Methods: In nine patients with AVNRT accompanied by variable ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction block, we examined the electrophysiologic characteristics of its upper common pathway.
Results: Tachycardia was induced by atrial burst and/or extrastimulus followed by atrial-His jump, and the earliest atrial electrogram was observed at the His bundle site in all patients. Twelve incidents of VA block: Wenckebach VA block (n = 7), 2:1 VA block (n = 4), and intermittent (n = 1) were observed. In two of seven Wenckebach VA block, the retrograde earliest atrial activation site shifted from the His bundle site to coronary sinus ostium just before VA block. Prolongation of His-His interval occurred during VA block in 11 of 12 incidents. After isoproterenol administration, 1:1 VA conduction resumed in all patients. Catheter ablation at the right inferoparaseptum eliminated antegrade slow pathway conduction and rendered AVNRT noninducible in all patients.
Conclusion: Selective elimination of the slow pathway conduction at the inferoparaseptal right atrium may suggest that the subatrial tissue linking the retrograde fast and antegrade slow pathways forms the upper common pathway in AVNRT with VA block.     

The history of AV nodal reentry

Though patients with AV nodal reentry are now routinely cured by catheter ablation, the basic mechanism of this disorder is still under debate. The putative mechanism of AV node reentry was first discovered by the elegant work of Gordon Moe. He demonstrated the existence of dual pathways and echo beats in rabbits. Building on these seminal observations, the mechanism of AVNRT has burgeoned to include the possibility of left atrial input into the node. The first curative nonpharmacologic procedures involved surgical dissection around the AV node and the procedure was rapidly supplanted by catheter ablation procedures. The initial ablative procedure targeted the fast pathway, but later observations showed that ablation of the slow pathway was more effective and safer. Cure of AV nodal reentry which is the most common cause of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia became possible through the cooperative efforts of anatomists, physiologists, surgeons, and clinical electrophysiologists.     

Successful selective ablation of fast atrioventricular node pathway by cryothermal energy application

This paper reports the experience of successful cryoablation of fast atrioventricular nodal pathway in a patient with recurrent atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia after previous unsuccessful attempts of slow pathway ablation. Slow formation of a permanent lesion by cryothermal energy application allowed precise modulation of atrioventricular nodal conduction until the endpoints of complete fast pathway ablation were met with long-term cure of the arrhythmia.     

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for AV Nodal Reentry: A Technique for Rapid Transection of the Slow AV Nodal Pathway

Selective radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of the slow AV nodal puthway has shed new light on the anatomy and physiology of the atrioventricular junction. The recording of “slow pathway potentials” facilitates localization of the slow pathway and has led to a concept of multiple pathway components with atrial insertion sites covering a potentially broad region surrounding the coronary sinus os. The critical area for complete interruption of the slow pathway may be larger than lesion size produced by ablation at a single site, resulting in multiple RF applications with lengthy sessions and prolonged radiation exposure. Information from both old and recent literature suggests that the slow AV nodal pathway is represented by a group of fibers originating from the posteroinferior interatrial septum and coursing anterosuperiorly near the tricuspid annulus before converging upon the compact AV node. Based on this anatomical arrangement, the present study was conducted to evaluate a technique designed to transect the slow pathway by producing a linear RF lesion perpendicular to the orientation of the slow pathway within the mid-portion of Koch's triangle. Using this technique, 30 of 30 patients with common AV nodal reentry ivere rendered noninducible using 1 to 3 RF applications. Total procedure time averaged 3.4 ± 1.1 hours and fluoroscopy time averaged 14.8 ± 4.6 minutes. As a marker of efficacy, episodic nonsustained atrial tachycardia (NSAT) during RF delivery occurred in 28 of 30 (93%) successful applications. Three patients experienced tachycardia recurrence and were successfully ablated by repeat procedure. Conduction characteristics and refractoriness of the fast pathway were unchanged in 23 of 23 patients reevaluated at a mean of 7.2 weeks postablation. Two of 30 (6%) patients experienced procedure related complications but there were no instances of AV block. We conclude that the technique of producing a linear lesion by continuous migratory RF application in the manner described safely and effectively eliminates AV nodal reentry, simplifies the procedure, and minimizes radiation exposure to the patient and the physician.     

Atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia with two functionally discrete fast pathways

We present a case with two forms of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) that revealed similar H-A-V sequences, but could be differentiated only by their retrograde atrial activation sequences. Both tachycardias were induced following anterograde slow pathway conduction, suggesting the slow pathway as the anterograde limb of the re-entry circuit. The earliest atrial activation site of one form was in the same region of the bundle of His as that of the common type of AVNRT, while that of the other form was the ostium of the coronary sinus. Properly timed extra-stimuli delivered from the atrium or ventricle during the latter tachycardia penetrated through the fast pathway without resetting the tachycardia cycle length. These rare phenomena suggest the existence of two functionally discrete fast pathways, of which the alternative pathway alters to become the more predominant retrograde limb according to time and circumstances.     

Fast pathway ablation in a patient with PR prolongation

The classical form of typical atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is a “slow-fast” pathways tachycardia, and the usual therapy is an ablation of the slow pathway since it carries a low risk of atrioventricular (AV) block. In patients with long PR interval and/or living on the anterograde slow pathway, an alternative technique is required. We report a case of a 42-year-old lady with idiopathic restrictive cardiomyopathy, persistent atrial fibrillation status post pulmonary vein isolation, and premature ventricular complex ablation with a systolic dysfunction, who presented with incessant slow narrow complex tachycardia of 110 bpm that appeared to be an AVNRT. Her baseline EKG revealed a first-degree AV block with a PR of 320 ms. EP study showed no evidence of anterograde fast pathway conduction. Given this fact, the decision was to attempt an ablation of the retrograde fast pathway. The fast pathway was mapped during tachycardia to its usual location into the anteroseptal region, then radiofrequency ablation in this location terminated tachycardia. After ablation, she continued to have her usual anterograde conduction through slow pathway and the tachycardia became uninducible. In special populations with prolonged PR interval or poor anterograde fast pathway conduction, fast pathway ablation is the required ablation for typical AVNRT.     

Determination of Repetitive Slow Pathway Conduction for Evaluation of the Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation in AVNRT

LUKAC, P., et al.: Determination of Repetitive Slow Pathway Conduction for Evaluation of the Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation in AVNRT. Aims: To determine whether the loss of repetitive slow pathway conduction identifies a successful radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT). Methods and results: Thirty nine consecutive patients undergoing ablation of AVNRT using the slow pathway approach were included. At baseline and after each radiofrequency application with an episode of junctional rhythm, repetitive slow pathway conduction was assessed as follows: Effective refractory period of the fast pathway was determined. The coupling interval of the first atrial extrastimulus (A2) was set at 30 ms below the effective refractory period of the fast pathway to ensure its conduction via the slow pathway. The second atrial extrastimulus (A3) was introduced at progressively longer coupling intervals starting from 200 ms until: (1) it propagated to the His bundle or (2) an anterogradely blocked AV nodal echo of A2 appeared before a conducted A3 depolarized the atrium in the His bundle electrogram. The response was termed repetitive slow pathway conduction if A3 was conducted with an   AH > 200 ms   . Application was considered successful if no AVNRT could be induced. Repetitive slow pathway conduction was present after 1 of 39 successful and after 34 of 40 ineffective applications   (P < 0.0001)   . Repetitive slow pathway conduction identified a successful application with 97% sensitivity, 86% specificity, 86% positive predictive value, and 97% negative predictive value. Conclusion: The presence of repetitive slow pathway conduction identifies an unsuccessful application with a clinically meaningful negative predictive value. (PACE 2003; 26[Pt. I]:827–835)     

Shortcut Link Between the Fast and Slow Pathways and the Mechanism of Cure in Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia by Catheter Ablation

The mechanism of cure in AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) by catheter ablation has not been fully clarified. We hypothesized that disruption of a shortcut link between the fast and slow pathways is responsible for the elimination of tachycardia. Results: AVNRT was eliminated in 20 patients by catheter ablation. In five patients (25%; group 1) slow pathway conduction disappeared 1 week after ablation. In six patients (30%; group II), the effective refractory period of the slow pathway was prolonged by more than 50 ms (212 ± 81 ms vs 340 ± 81 ms; P < 0.05). In the remaining nine patients (45%; group III), there was no change in the refractory period (270 ± 65 ms vs 273 ± 74 ms), although tachycardia was not inducible. A shortcut link between the fast and slow pathways was examined by comparing the A-H intervals over the slow pathway during the tachycardia and during atrial pacing at the tachycardia cycle length. Prior to ablation, a shortcut link was assumed in 1 of group I patients, 2 of group II patients, and 8 of group III patients. Of the 9 patients in whom the slow pathway was not impaired after ablation (group III), 8 patients were found to have a shortcut link, while 8 of 11 patients with impairment of the slow pathway after ablation (groups I and II) had no shortcut link between the fast and slow pathways (P < 0.05). Conclusion: In patients with a shortcut link between the fast and slow pathways, slow pathway conduction itself does not need to be impaired to eliminate the AVNRT, whereas in patients without this shortcut link, slow pathway conduction must be impaired.     

房室结双径路消融中特殊电生理现象分析与处理

目的 :分析房室结折返性心动过速 (AVNRT)慢径路消融中特殊电生理现象及处理体会。方法 :慢径路消融前常规行心内电生理检查。结果 :有特殊电生理现象者 8例 ,其中 3例患者AVNRT开始时表现为房室 2 :1传导 ,阻滞点在希氏束以上部位 ;3例患者房室结功能曲线呈连续性 ;1例为慢 -慢型AVNRT ;1例心内电生理检查未能诱发出AVNRT。所有患者慢径消融均成功。结论 :术前应行详细的心内电生理检查和仔细鉴别 ,其消融方法与典型AVNRT相同