GDP方案治疗侵袭性复发性或难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤

目的:探讨吉西他滨联合顺铂、地塞米松(GDP方案)治疗侵袭性复发性或难治性NHL的疗效和毒副作用。方法:从2003年5月到2008年5月,共治疗53例侵袭性复发难治的NHL患者,其中复发和难治者分别为35例和18例。B细胞和T细胞来源分别为30例和23例。中度和高度侵袭性NHL分别为44例和9例,分别接受过CHOP方案或CHOP类方案和HyperCVAD方案治疗至少2个周期,既往接受过局部放疗22例。所有患者采用GDD方案挽救化疗,3~4周为一个周期,共2~6个周期。结果:53例患者接受平均4.4个周期化疗(共231个周期),所有患者可评价疗效和不良反应。完全缓解(CR)率24.5%(13/53),总有效率(RR)为52.8%(28/53)。其中难治者CR率5.6%(1/18),RR率为33.3%(6/18),复发者CR率为34.3%(12/35),RR率为62.9%(22/35),两者差别具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。此外,高度侵袭性患者和血清LDH高的患者,具有较低的CR率和RR率(P<0.05)。全组中位随访时间36个月(5个月~51个月),中位复发时间为7个月(3个月~34个月),中位生存时间11个月(3个月~51个月),1年和2年总生存率分别35.0%和11.4%。复发NHL和难治NHL没有显示生存差别(P=0.261)。主要不良反应是骨髓抑制,出现Ⅲ度~Ⅳ度的粒细胞和血小板减少的发生率分别为39.6%和26.4%。结论:GDP方案是中度侵袭性复发性或难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤安全有效的化疗方案,对高度侵袭性NHL,该方案疗效值得进一步验证。LDH升高、高度侵袭性患者和难治者具有较差反应率。     

氟达拉滨联合方案治疗复发难治非霍奇金淋巴瘤临床疗效观察

目的观察氟达拉滨联合化疗治疗复发难治非霍奇金淋巴瘤临床疗效及安全性。方法38例复发难治非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者均采用FND方案：氟达拉滨30mg/m² d1~3,米托蒽醌10mg/m² d1,曲安西龙80mg pod 1~5, 28天一周期。结果全组患者CR 8例（21%）,PR 13例（34%）,有效率56%;其中20例复发难治惰性淋巴瘤患者CR7例（35%）,PR9例（45%）,有效率80%; 18例复发难治侵袭性淋巴瘤患者CR 1例（6%）,PR 4例（22%）,有效率28%（ χ²=10.45, P =0.001）。全组患者中位随访22（1~47）月,复发难治惰性淋巴瘤患者中位生存期45（2~47）月,中位无进展生存期18（2~34）月;复发难治侵袭性淋巴瘤患者中位生存期15（2~45）月,中位无进展生存期3（1~22）月。不良反应主要为骨髓抑制和肺感染。结论氟达拉滨联合方案治疗惰性淋巴瘤疗效肯定,对复发难治侵袭性淋巴瘤患者疗效尚可,不失为一种治疗选择。     

DICE方案解救治疗侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的临床观察

目的：观察DICE方案解救治疗23例侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的客观缓解率和不良反应。方法：23例复发、难治的侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者接受DICE方案治疗2周期,观察客观缓解率和主要不良反应。结果：23例患者总有效率65．2％,CR6例（26．1％）,PR9例（39．1％）。IPI为2分的低中危组5例,IPI为3分的高中危组11例,IPI为4—5分的高危组7例。3组RR分别为100％、72．7％、57．1％。骨髓毒性Ⅲ至Ⅳ度为8例（34．8％）。结论：复发、难治的侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤采用DICE方案解救治疗是安全、有效的。     

CLAG方案治疗复发难治急性髓系白血病的疗效观察

目的:评价CLAG方案（2-CdA+Ara-C+G-CSF）治疗复发难治急性髓系白血病的疗效及安全性。方法:回顾性分析我中心2015年6月至2016年8月应用CLAG方案治疗的12例复发难治急性髓系白血病患者。结果:12例患者均系复发难治急性髓系白血病,根据NCCN急性髓系白血病指南（2017年第1版）细胞遗传学及分子生物学标记,进行危险度分级,其中预后良好组3例,预后中等组5例,预后不良组4例。所有患者均给予1疗程CLAG方案化疗,其中8例（72.7%）达到完全缓解（CR）,2例（18.2%）达到部分缓解（PR）,总有效率（OR）90.9%。所有患者均出现Ⅲ-Ⅳ级血液学毒性,主要毒副反应为粒细胞缺乏及血小板减少所导致的感染和出血,其中肺部感染8例（72.7%）,侵袭性真菌病5例（45.5%）,革兰阴性杆菌败血症2例（18.2%）。6例患者（54.5%）发生Ⅲ-Ⅳ级出血,1例因弥漫性肺泡出血早期死亡。化疗所致恶心呕吐、肝肾毒性、口腔黏膜炎等非血液学毒性均为Ⅰ-Ⅱ级。结论:CLAG方案治疗复发难治性急性髓系白血病有效率较高。化疗所致骨髓抑制较重,但合并感染、出血可控制,非血液学毒性轻微,安全性较好,可作为复发难治急性髓系白血病挽救性治疗的首选方案。     

DICE方案治疗复发或难治中高度恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的疗效分析

目的：目前对于复发或难治中高度恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤（non-Hodgkin＇s lymphoma，NHL）尚无标准解救化疗方案，本文旨在探讨DICE方案（地塞米松、异环磷酞胺、顺铂及VP-16）治疗复发或难治中高度恶性NHL的疗效和不良反应。方法：22例复发或难治中高度恶性NHL患者，既往均接受过2～6个周期的CHOP化疗方案无缓解或复发。现采用DICE方案化疗，中位疗程数4个周期（2～7个周期），所有患者均可评价疗效和不良反应。对患者进行解救治疗，并对毒副反应加以评估、预防及治疗。结果：22例患者DICE方案化疗后，总有效率为63.6%，完全缓解率为40.9%；T、B细胞NHL有效率分别为75.0%、57.1%，完全缓解率分别为37.5%、42.9%（P〉0.05）；LDH升高、伴有巨大肿块是影响复发耐药患者近期疗效的高危因素（P均〈0.05）。经DICE方案治疗的患者，骨髓抑制、消化系统反应、脱发是较常见的并发症，经过治疗均恢复，无治疗相关死亡。结论：DICE方案治疗难治和复发性NHL有效。     

EPOCH方案治疗复发难治侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤32例

【摘要】目的观察EPOCH方案治疗复发难治侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤（NHL）的疗效及安全性。方法选择经病理确诊的复发难治侵袭性NHL患者32例,应用EPOCH方案化疗,观察其近期疗效和不良反应。具体用药为依托泊苷（VP16）每天50mg／m^2,多柔比星（ADM）或吡柔比星（THP）每天10mg／m^2,长春新碱（VCR）每天0．4mg／m^2持续静脉滴注,第1天至第4天,环磷酰胺（CTX）每天750mg／m^2静脉滴注第5天,泼尼松每天60mg／m^2口服第1天至第5天,21d为1个疗程。结果32例患者总有效率62．5％,完全缓解（CR）率21．9％,部分缓解（PR）率40.6％,主要不良反应为骨髓抑制。结论EPOCH方案可作为复发难治侵袭性NHL的治疗方案,缓解率高,安全性好,其长期疗效有待进一步观察。     

氟达拉滨联合异环磷酰胺治疗利妥昔单抗治疗后复发难治非霍奇金淋巴瘤21例

目的：探讨氟达拉滨联合异环磷酰胺方案对利妥昔单抗治疗后复发难治非霍奇金淋巴瘤（NHL）的治疗效果。方法21例利妥昔单抗治疗后复发难治NHL患者应用氟达拉滨联合异环磷酰胺方案联合化疗,2个月为1个周期,每个周期进行疗效及不良反应评价。结果21例患者中完全缓解4例,部分缓解9例,疾病稳定5例,疾病进展3例,临床总有效率为61.90%（13／21）。其中惰性淋巴瘤的总有效率为71.43%（5／7）,侵袭性淋巴瘤为57.14%（8／14）,两者差异无统计学意义（P＝0.656）。结论氟达拉滨联合异环磷酰胺方案治疗利妥昔单抗治疗后复发难治的NHL患者效果较好。     

复发难治T细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的疗效及预后分析

背景与目的:复发难治T细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤(non-Hodgkin's lymphoma,NHL)患者预后差,尚无确定的预后因素,目前仍无标准的治疗方案.本研究探讨复发难治T细胞NHL患者预后相关因素及有效治疗方案.方法:1997年1月至2003年3月中山大学肿瘤防治中心共收治复发难治T细胞NHL 45例.回顾性分析其近期疗效、远期疗效和预后因素.结果:截止2006年7月,中位随访时间30个月(2～70个月),5例仍生存,复发后中位生存时间(MST)为22个月(2～62个月).全组患者中,42例(93.3%)接受挽救化疗,有效率为61.9%(26/42),其中接受二线化疗方案有效率为52.4%(22/42).1年总生存(overall survival,OS)75.6%,3年OS 17.8%,5年OS 4.4%.将二线国际预后指数(international prognostic index,IPI)0～1分和2分合并为低危组,3分和4～5分合并为高危组,进行生存比较,两者MST均未达到,低危组1年、3年和5年OS分别为82.1%、25.0%、5.8%,高危组1年、3年和5年OS分别为64.7%、6.5%、6.5%,有统计学意义(P=0.026).多因素分析表明,血清乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平(P=0.010)、二线Ann Arbor分期(P=0.009)、二线IPI评分(P=0.015)、自体造血干细胞移植(P=0.026)、PS状态(P=0.002)和接受IMVP-16方案化疗(P=0.026)与复发难治T细胞NHL患者复发后OS密切相关.结论:二线IPI评分、自体造血干细胞移植等因素是复发难治T细胞NHL独立预后因素;复发难治T细胞NHL预后不佳,常规化疗缓解后应考虑加用如自体造血干细胞移植等治疗方法.     

非霍奇金淋巴瘤中枢神经系统累及的诊断和预防

 非霍奇金淋巴瘤（NHL）患者中枢神经系统（CNS）累及预后不良,其中位生存期2～6个月。与NHL CNS累及相关参数是年轻、进展期、累及结外部位数、乳酸脱氢酶（LDH）增高和国际预后指标（IPI）积分。最有希望的治疗为自体造血干细胞移植,可延长中数生存期10～26个月。处于CNS侵袭高危状态的某些NHL亚型患者需要早期进行CNS预防,如伯基特淋巴瘤（BL）和淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤（LBL）。弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤（DLBCL）初期治疗时是否需应用CNS预防久有争议,因为它属于CNS累及（≈5 ％）的低危群体。危险模式的确定有助于预示NHL的CNS复发。     

吉西他滨长春瑞滨联合吡喃阿霉素方案治疗复发难治T细胞淋巴瘤疗效分析

  目的   探讨吉西他滨、长春瑞滨联合吡喃阿霉素（GNT）方案对复发难治T细胞淋巴瘤（TCL）患者的疗效和毒副作用。   方法   应用GNT方案治疗69例复发难治TCL患者,方案为吉西他滨800 mg/m2,d1、8,长春瑞滨25 mg/m2,d1,吡喃阿霉素20 mg/m2,d1,21天为1个周期。   结果   总有效率（ORR）为65.2%,其中CR为29.0%。主要不良反应为血液学毒性。患者1、3、5年OS分别是71.7%、47.3%、32.4%,中位生存期为36个月。   结论   GNT方案治疗复发难治TCL疗效较高、可耐受。      

Comparison on therapeutic effects of RFT and RCTVP regimen in the treatment of patients with indolent B-cell lymphoma in China

To compare the efficacy and safety of RFT (retuximab, fludarabine, pirarubicin) with RCTVP (retuximab, cyclophophamide, pirarubicin, vindesine and prednisone) in 248 indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients. Two hundred and forty-eight patients with indolent B-cell NHL were treated with combined chemotherapy, including RFT and RCTVP, from January 2002 to December 2010 in Tianjin Cancer Hospital. The rate of response, toxicity and long-term survival for the two regimens were analyzed retrospectively. For the previously untreated patients, overall response rate for RFT arm and RCTVP arm was 71.7 and 70.6%, and complete response rate was 47.5 and 54.9%, respectively (P?>?0.05). For the refractory and relapsed patients, overall response (OR) rate and complete response (CR) rate were significantly improved in the RFT arm versus the RCTVP arm (P?相似文献   

DICE方案治疗复发或耐药中高度恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤

背景与目的:复发或耐药非霍奇金淋巴瘤(non鄄Hodgkin蒺slymphoma,NHL)目前尚无标准的解救化疗方案,DICE、ESHAP、MINE和EPOCH等常见的解救治疗方案缓解率仅为30%～70%。本文旨在观察DICE方案作为解救化疗方案治疗复发或耐药中高度恶性NHL的疗效和安全性。方法:选取35例复发或耐药的中高度恶性NHL患者,其中T细胞和B细胞NHL分别为14和21例,既往接受过以CHOP或CHOP样方案为主中位6周期(2～12个周期)的化疗,采用DICE方案进行解救治疗。结果:35例患者接受了中位4周期(2～7个周期)的DICE方案化疗,所有患者均可评价疗效和不良反应。总的客观有效率为74.3%,完全缓解率为31.4%;中位缓解时间为4个月(1～30个月),中位至治疗失败时间为7个月(2～34个月),中位生存期为14个月(3～51个月),实际2年生存率为33.3%。T细胞和B细胞NHL的有效率分别为85.7%(12/14)和66.7%(14/21),完全缓解率分别为50.0%(7/14)和19.0%(4/21)(P=0.073)。LDH升高和伴有巨大肿块是影响解救治疗疗效的高危因素(P<0.05),DICE解救疗效是复发耐药患者生存期的独立预后因素(P=0.001)。主要不良反应为骨髓抑制,Ⅲ～Ⅳ度粒细胞和血小板减少的发生率分别为71.4%和8.6%。结论:DICE方案是复发或耐药中高度恶性NHL安全有效的解救治疗方案。LDH升高和伴有巨大     

Rituximab, gemcitabine, cisplatin, and dexamethasone in patients with refractory or relapsed aggressive B-cell lymphoma

This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Rituximab, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and Dexamethasone (R-GDP) in relapsed or refractory aggressive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL). Treatments consisted of rituximab 375?mg/m(2), i.v. on day 1; gemcitabine 1,000?mg/m(2), i.v. on days 1 and 8, dexamethasone 40?mg i.v. on days 1-4, and cisplatin 25?mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1-3, every 21?days. The primary end-points were the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included response rate (ORR; CR) and toxicities. Eligible patients could then proceed to high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or receive up to six treatment cycles. From January 2005 to December 2010, 50 successive patients at Tianjin cancer hospital lymphoma department were enrolled in this study. All patients were recurrent or refractory aggressive B-cell NHL, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n?=?30) and follicular lymphoma grade 3b (n?=?20). The median follow-up time was 42?months (range, 12-70). After two cycles, the overall response rate was 72.0?%, with a CR/CRu rate of 56?%. The 2-year OS and PFS of all patients were 70.0 and 48.0?%, respectively. Grade III-IV neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 34 and 40?% of patients, respectively. Twenty-one patients (42?%) proceeded to ASCT. Higher International Prognostic Index and refractory disease were independently associated with worse survival and progression-free survival. R-GDP chemotherapy in patients with refractory or relapsed aggressive B-Cell NHL was effective as a salvage therapy and helpful for HDC/ASCT.     

含美罗华联合方案治疗复发耐药B细胞性非霍奇金淋巴瘤

Objective： The prognosis of relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoma is poor, with a short-term survival after conventional second-line chemotherapy, Rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 antigen, in combination with CHOP or CHOP-like chemotherapy may improve both disease free survival （DFS） and overall survival （OS） of naive patients, but its role in the second-line therapy for relapsed non-Hodgkin＇s Lymphoma （NHL） remains to be defined, This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of rituximab-containing salvage regimens for relapsed or refractory NHL, and observe the toxicities. Methods： The clinical data of 54 patients, who were with relapsed or refractory NHL and treated in the Cancer Center of Sun Yat-sen University, were analyzed retrospectively, Of the 54 patients, 29 were man, 25 were women, with a median age of 52.5 years old （range 18 to 75）; 50 patients （92.6%） scored 0-1 for the ECOG performance status; for second-line international prognostic index （slPI）, 21 （38.9%） scored 0-1,30 （55.6%） scored 2 to 3, and 3 （5.6%） scored 4-5; 40 cases were diffuse large B-cell lymphoma （DLBCL）, accounting for 74.1% of all subtypes, Rituximab was administered intravenously at a dose of 375 mg/m^2 at the day before each chemotherapy cycle, The second or third-line salvage regimens included EPOCH, CHOP, DHAP, DICE, IVAC, IMVP-16 and FND, Results： Of the 54 patients, 49 received retuximab-containing salvage regimens, The objective response rate of the 45 evaluable cases was 68,8%, with a complete remission （CR） rate of 37.7%; 3 patients achieved CR after radiotherapy following rituximab-based regimens and 3 achieved CR after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, The most frequent adverse events were leucopenia, nausea and alopecia. The addition of rituximab to chemotherapy only elevated the occurrence of mild infusion-related reactions, such as chills, fever and pruritus. The median follow-up time was 18 months （range 2-86 months）; 5 patients were lost, 24 were dead （23 died of lymphoma, and 1 died of severe hepatitis）, the other patients remained alive. The median survival time was 32 months （range 2-86 months, 95% confidential interval 16-48 months）. The 1-, 2- and 3-year OS rates were 70.6%, 53,6% and 41,5%, respectively, The median TTP was 6 months （range 0-52 months）, The median PFS was 10 months （range 0-47 months, 95% CI 0-26 months）, The 1- and 2-year PFS were 49,3% and 41,3%. Conclusion： Rituximab-containing salvage regimens are effective and well tolerated therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell NHL, even those were extensively treated.     

Clinical outcomes of a novel combination of lenalidomide and rituximab followed by stem cell transplantation for relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell non-hodgkin lymphoma

We retrospectively compared outcomes of patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who underwent stem cell transplantation (SCT) with stable disease or better following a novel combination of lenalidomide and rituximab (LR) treatment and did not undergo SCT in a phase I/II clinical trial. We retrospectively compared outcomes of patients who underwent SCT with that of patients who had stable disease or better following LR treatment and did not undergo SCT. Twenty-two patients enrolled in LR clinical trial and undergone SCT were identified, 13 with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and nine with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). All patients who underwent SCT achieved complete response. In the MCL subset, there were no significant differences between SCT and non-SCT groups except that non-SCT patients were older and had a higher mantle-cell international prognostic index score. There was no difference between SCT-group and non-SCT-group in response duration (P=0.3), progression-free survival (PFS) (P=0.304) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.87). In LBCL subgroup, there were no significant differences between two groups except that non-SCT group had a higher international prognostic index score. Patients with LBCL who underwent SCT had significantly longer response duration (P=0.001), PFS (P=0.000), and OS (P=0.003) than the non-SCT group. The novel therapeutic combination offers a bridge to SCT in patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell NHL.     

EPOCH方案治疗复发和耐药中高度恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤

背景和目的：复发或耐药非霍奇金淋巴瘤（non-Hodgkin‘s lymphoma,NHL)是肿瘤化疗的难点之一,目前尚无标准的解救方案。临床前研究和临床研究均证明部分抗癌药物持续静脉灌注可提高疗效或降低毒性,本试验的目的为观察用EPOCH方案胸脉灌注治疗NHL患者的疗效和不良反应。方法：2001年6月到2002年6月共收治26例复发或耐药中高度恶性NHL,其中20例（84．7％）患者至少接受2个化疗方案的治疗,中位方案数2（1－6）个,中位疗程数8（3－16）个,15例（65．7％）患者复发耐药;采用含蒽环类药物连续静脉滴注的方案EPOCH（VP－16,EPI／ADM,VCR,CTX,Prednisone)化疗1－6个疗程（中位2个疗程）。结果：本组26例患者均可评价疗效和不良反应,总的客观有效率50％,完全缓解率19．2％,其中T细胞来源NHL有效率为28．6％,B细胞来源NHL为57．9％,26例患者共实施46个疗程化疗,主要不良反应为骨髓抑制,其中Ⅲ-Ⅳ度粒细胞减少发生率为34．8％,Ⅲ-Ⅳ度血小板减少发生率为8．7％,其他不良反应少见。结论：EPOCH是复发或耐药中高度恶性NHL经济有效的解救方案,值得进一步研究推广。     

血清CRP、LDH水平及贫血与难治性或复发性非霍奇金淋巴瘤预后关系的探讨

目的探讨血清C反应蛋白(CRP)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平及贫血与难治性或复发性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)患者预后的关系。方法将血清CRP、LDH、血红蛋白(Hb)等因素纳入单因素分析和多因素Cox比例风险模型进行回归分析,以确定其是否为60例NHL患者预后的独立危险因素,分析LAC指数、不同挽救治疗方案对难治性或复发性NHL患者生存情况的影响。结果多因素Cox比例风险模型分析结果显示,血清CRP水平异常升高、血清LDH水平异常升高、处于贫血状态、采取挽救治疗方案DH AP/DH AP+R是难治性或复发性NHL患者生存的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。Log-rank检验结果显示,血清CRP水平正常与异常升高、LDH水平正常与异常升高、Hb水平正常与贫血患者的生存情况比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。60例难治性或复发性NHL患者中,高危组患者32例,低危组患者28例,两组生存情况比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。Cox比例风险模型回归分析结果显示,LAC指数是难治性或复发性NHL患者预后的高危因素(P<0.01)。低危组患者对治疗的总体反应率和完全缓解率均明显高于高危组(P<0.01)。不同挽救治疗方案难治性或复发性NHL患者的生存情况比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论经挽救治疗后,血清CRP、LDH水平较高及处于贫血状态提示复发或难治性NHL患者预后不良。     

CAR T-cell therapy for B-cell lymphoma

Chimeric antigen receptor-modified (CAR) T-cell therapy targeting CD19 has revolutionized the treatment of relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphomas. Based on unprecedented response rates and durability of response in high risk B-cell lymphoma patients, anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy was rapidly approved by the FDA for a variety of lymphoma subtypes. Anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy is now considered standard of care for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) aggressive non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) after 2 or more lines of therapy. Three second-generation anti-CD19 CAR T-cell products have been FDA approved for R/R aggressive B-cell lymphoma and FDA approval has been obtained for Mantle Cell Lymphoma and Follicular lymphoma as well. This has ensured broad access to CAR T-cell therapy for patients with NHL and new real-world trials have helped confirm feasibility of CAR T-cell therapy for a broad patient population. The emergence of CAR T-cell therapy will likely provide a new patient population who is status post anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy. Investigation of mechanisms of failure of CAR T-cell therapy and clinical trials to study strategies to address this are thus required. Here we provide a thorough review on the use of the FDA approved anti-CD19 CAR T-cell products axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, and lisocabtagene maraleucel in patients with indolent or aggressive B-cell lymphoma, and touch on mechanisms of failure of CAR T-cell therapy and potential approaches which are currently under investigation to address this.     

ATT循环方案治疗复发及难治性非霍奇金恶性淋巴瘤

背景与目的:复发性和难治性非霍奇金恶性淋巴瘤(non-Hodgkin's lymphoma,NHL)的治疗一直是临床的难题之一。三联循环方案(alternating triple therapy,ATT)是ASHAP、m-BACOD、MINE3种方案每3周交替使用。本研究的目的是探讨ATT治疗复发及难治性NHL的疗效。方法:回顾性分析用ATT方案治疗的38例复发及难治性NHL患者的临床资料,其中复发性NHL28例,难治性NHL10例。结果:10例(26.3%)患者达到完全缓解,12例(31.6%)达到部分缓解,总有效率为63.2%。B细胞性淋巴瘤总有效率为60.0%(12/20),而T细胞性淋巴瘤总有效率为55.6%(10/18)。≤60岁年龄组总有效率为65.4%(17/26),>60岁组总有效率为41.7%(5/12)。全组中位随访时间11个月,1年总生存率42.1%(16/38),2年总生存率为13.2%(5/38)。毒副作用以骨髓抑制为主。结论:ATT循环方案对于复发及难治性NHL有较好的疗效,毒副反应患者可以耐受,值得在更多病例中进一步研究。     

A phase II trial of ProMACE-CytaBOM in previously untreated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of intermediate- or high-grade histology.

Between November 1985 and June 1989 the aggressive combination chemotherapy programme ProMACE-CytaBOM was used at a community-based hospital as primary treatment for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) of intermediate or high-grade histology in Ann-Arbor stages IB-IV. The 53 patients entering the study represented 90 per cent of all consecutive eligible patients with NHL diagnosed during the time period considered. Their median age was 54 years and median observation time was 36 months. Of 50 patients evaluable for response, 35 (70 per cent) achieved complete remission (CR), seven (14 per cent) partial remission, and five (10 per cent) were refractory. Treatment was given on an outpatient basis. Actually delivered drug doses ranged from 88 per cent to 97 per cent of the theoretical doses. Life-threatening toxicity was experienced by four patients. Treatment was stopped in three cases (6 per cent) because of toxicity and there was one treatment-related death. Actuarial 2-year disease-free survival of patients in CR was 73 per cent. Overall actuarial 3-year survival and disease-free survival were 67 per cent and 51 per cent respectively. High LDH level was a significant adverse prognostic factor both for achievement of CR (P less than 0.005) and for survival (P less than 0.0002). Age was of no prognostic importance. We conclude that ProMACE-CytaBOM is an effective, easy to administer and well-tolerated regimen for patients with aggressive NHL.