Induction of apoptosis by <Emphasis Type="Italic">p53</Emphasis>, <Emphasis Type="Italic">bax</Emphasis>, <Emphasis Type="Italic">bcl-2</Emphasis>, and <Emphasis Type="Italic">p21</Emphasis> expressed in colorectal cancer

Background We investigated the influence of genes on the apoptosis of colorectal tumor cells, based on DNA and mRNA kinetics.Methods In 30 colorectal cancer patients, we examined the mRNA expression of p53, bax, bcl-2, and p21 ^WAF1 , and we also investigated the development of tumor cell apoptosis, using a terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP-biotin nick-end labeling (TUNEL) method.Results TUNEL-positive cells showed a positive correlation with bax (P = 0.010) and a negative correlation with p21 (P = 0.04). We also investigated the relationship between p53 point mutation, p21 immunostaining degree, and apoptosis, based on DNA ladder expression. A remarkable correlation (P = 0.0090) was found between p21 and apoptosis.Conclusions The present study findings suggest that tumor cell apoptosis is (1) strongly inhibited by p21, (2) induced by bax, and (3) influenced by bcl-2, which, presumably, inhibits tumor cell apoptosis.     

Genetic variation in <Emphasis Type="Italic">IGF1</Emphasis>, <Emphasis Type="Italic">IGFBP3</Emphasis>, <Emphasis Type="Italic">IRS1</Emphasis>, <Emphasis Type="Italic">IRS2</Emphasis> and risk of breast cancer in women living in Southwestern United States

Background An insulin-related pathway to breast cancer has been hypothesized. Methods We examine the 19 CA repeat of the IGF1 gene, the -202 C > A IGFBP3, the G972R IRS, and the G1057D IRS2 polymorphisms among 1,175 non-Hispanic white (NHW) and 576 Hispanic newly diagnosed breast cancer cases and 1,330 NHW and 727 Hispanic controls living in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah. Results Among post-menopausal women not recently exposed to hormones, not having the 19 CA repeat of IGF1 gene was associated with breast cancer among NHW women [odds ratio (OR) 2.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21–3.79] and having an R allele of G972R IRS1 increased breast cancer risk among Hispanic women (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.13–6.46). Among post-menopausal Hispanic women recently exposed to hormones the A allele of the -202 C > A IGFBP3 polymorphism increased risk of breast cancer (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.06–2.33). The IGF1 19 CA repeat polymorphism interacted with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) among NHW post-menopausal women; women who had the 19/19 IGF1 genotype were at reduced risk of breast cancer (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47–0.88) if they did not use HRT. We also observed interaction between body mass index and IGF1 19 CA repeat (p=0.06) and between weight gain and the -202 C > A IGFBP3 polymorphism (p=0.05) in NHW post-menopausal women not recently exposed to hormones. Conclusions Our data suggest that associations between insulin-related genes and breast cancer risk among women living in the Southwestern United States may be dependent on estrogen exposure and may differ by ethnicity.     

Prognostic significance of co-overexpression of the <Emphasis Type="Italic">EGFR</Emphasis>/<Emphasis Type="Italic">IGFBP-2</Emphasis>/<Emphasis Type="Italic">HIF-2A</Emphasis> genes in astrocytomas

Overexpression of the EGFR, IGFBP-2 and HIF-2A genes has been observed in high-grade astrocytomas and these genes seem to be functionally related to one another. This study aimed to define the profile of their expressions, interactions and correlation with clinical features and prognostic significance in microdissected tumor samples from 84 patients with astrocytomas of different grades and from 6 white matter non-neoplasic brain tissue sample. EGFR, IGFBP-2 and HIF-2A gene expression levels were analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR and differed significantly between grades I–IV astrocytic tumors (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001 and P: 0.0013, respectively) when analyzed by the Kruskal–Wallis test. Grade I astrocytomas presented gene expression levels similar to those encountered in samples of microdissected white matter of non-neoplastic brain tissue Overexpression of the EGFR, IGFBP-2 and HIF-2A genes was significantly associated with lower 2-year survival (P: 0.009, P: 0.0002 and P: 0.008, respectively). Co-overexpression of these genes was strongly associated with high-grade gliomas and lower survival in univariate (P < 0.0001) and multivariate (P: 0.009) analysis, suggesting that the co-expression of the EGFR/IGFBP-2/HIF-2A pathway genes may have a more important clinical and biological impact than the expression of each individual gene alone. These data support the existence of a common pathway involving these genes that could contribute to the design of new target treatments.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">BRAF</Emphasis>/K-<Emphasis Type="Italic">ras</Emphasis> mutation,microsatellite instability,and promoter hypermethylation of <Emphasis Type="Italic">hMLH1</Emphasis>/<Emphasis Type="Italic">MGMT</Emphasis> in human gastric carcinomas

Background The BRAF and K-ras genes are the most frequently mutated oncogenes in various human malignancies. We examined BRAF and K-ras mutations in human gastric cancer, and investigated their relationship with microsatellite instability (MSI) and the hypermethylation of promoter regions in hMLH1 and O ⁶ -methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT).Methods Sixteen gastric cancer cell lines and 62 gastric cancer tissue samples were screened for BRAF and K-ras mutations by direct sequencing. We also performed a microsatellite assay and investigated methylation status in the promoter regions of hMLH1 and MGMT.Results mutation was not found in any of the cancer cell lines examined. One (1.6%) cancer tissue sample showed a point mutation in the BRAF gene (GT_G GA_G; V599E). K-ras mutation (GG_T GA_T, G12D) was detected in five (31%) gastric cancer cell lines and in 1 (1.6%) gastric cancer tissue sample. In the gastric cancer tissue samples examined, MSI was detected in 23 (37%) samples. Hypermethylated promoter regions in hMLH1 and MGMT, respectively, were detected in 6 (10%) and 13 (21%) gastric cancer tissue samples. Microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors showed frequent lymphatic invasion (P = 0.050).Conclusion Although BRAF mutation has been reported in a variety of other human cancers, it is a rare event in the carcinogenesis and progression/development of gastric cancer.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA1</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA2</Emphasis> germline mutation analysis in the Indonesian population

Specific mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes have been identified in specific populations and ethnic groups. However, little is known about the contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations to breast cancers in the Indonesian population. One hundred-twenty moderate to high risk breast cancer patients were tested using PCR-DGGE, and any aberrant band was sequenced. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) was performed on all samples to detect large deletions in the two genes. Twenty-three different mutations were detected in 30 individuals, ten were deleterious mutations and 20 were "unclassified variants" with uncertain clinical consequences. Three of seven (c.2784_2875insT, p.Leu1415X and del exon 13-15) and two of four (p.Glu2183X and p.Gln2894X) deleterious mutations that were found in BRCA1 and BRCA2 respectively, are novel. Several novel, pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations are found in early onset Indonesian breast cancer patients, these may therefore be specific for the Indonesian population.     

The <Emphasis Type="Italic">CHEK2</Emphasis> 1100delC mutation is not present in Korean patients with breast cancer cases tested for <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA1</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA2</Emphasis> mutation

The germline CHEK2 1100delC mutation is a low penetrance breast cancer susceptibility allele, frequently observed in patient with family history of breast cancer and/or young age and the frequency varied according to race or ethnicity. In this study, we evaluated the significance of CHEK2 1100delC in predisposition to breast cancer by assessing its frequency in a material of 493 Korean breast cancer patients who had been screened for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations (42 patients had deleterious mutation of BRCA1/2). Mutation detection of CHEK2 1100delC was based upon analysis of primer extension products generated for previously amplified genomic DNA using a chip based MALDI-TOP mass spectrometry platform. After overall measurement automatically, assays which had bad peaks were checked again manually. None of the 493 Korean patients with breast cancer who were candidate for BRCA1 and BRCA2 test carried the 1100delC mutation observed in Caucasians with limited frequency. In the previous studies, we observed higher or comparable prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Korean patients with breast cancer compared to Caucasian breast cancer population. In the present study, we evaluated the role of a CHEK2 1100delC as a susceptibility mutation of breast cancer in the Korean population. However, our results suggest that this mutation is absent or may be very infrequent in Korean patients with breast cancer who have high risk of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation, making its screening irrelevant from the practical point view.     

Polymorphisms of the <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA2</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">RAD51</Emphasis> Genes in Breast Cancer

Summary We performed a case-control study (150 cases and 150 controls) to test the association between three polymorphisms in BRCA2 and RAD51 genes and breast cancer risk. Genotypes were determined in DNA from blood cells by PCR–RFLP. Cancer occurrence was strongly associated with the BRCA2 Met/1915Thr homozygous polymorphic variants, whereas heterozygous variant was associated with significant reduction in breast cancer risk. Gene-gene interaction between the BRCA2-Met1915Thr Thr/Thr and BRCA2-Met784Val Met/Met homozygous variants increased the risk. Therefore, the Met1915Thr polymorphism in the BRCA2 gene may be considered as an independent marker of breast cancer.     

Absence of the common <Emphasis Type="Italic">IGF1</Emphasis> 19 CA-repeat allele is more common among <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA1</Emphasis> mutation carriers than among non-carriers from <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA1</Emphasis> families

BRCA1 mutations predispose to early-onset breast cancer. We previously reported an association between absence of the common IGF1 19 CA-repeat allele (IGF1-19/-19) and being a BRCA1 mutation carrier in young women from breast cancer high-risk families. Others have reported a four-fold risk of premenopausal breast cancer in women with a family history and the IGF1-19/-19 genotype. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the IGF1-19/-19 genotype was associated with being a BRCA1 mutation carrier among women from BRCA1 families. DNA was available from 268 women with known BRCA1 status from the South Swedish Health Care Region. IGF1 genotyping was successfully performed with fragment analysis in 211 women from 96 families. The IGF1-19/-19 genotype was significantly more common among BRCA1 mutation carriers (14.2%) than among non-carriers (4.8%), OR 3.3 (95%CI 1.11-9.78, P = 0.03) adjusted for family clustering. We confirmed our previous finding of an association between the IGF1-19/-19 genotype and BRCA1 mutation status. Since the IGF1-19/-19 genotype in combination with OC use or multiparity confers an increased risk for early onset breast cancer in high-risk women and in women from the general population, future studies are needed to elucidate the importance of the IGF1-19/-19 genotype concerning the variability in breast cancer risk among BRCA1 mutation carriers.     

Influence of germline polymorphisms of <Emphasis Type="Italic">GSTT1</Emphasis>, <Emphasis Type="Italic">GSTM1</Emphasis>, and <Emphasis Type="Italic">GSTP1</Emphasis> in familial versus sporadic breast cancer susceptibility and survival

Identifying genes associated with familial inheritance of breast cancer continues to be a major goal of current research as the known high penetrance genes could be attributable for only a small percentage of the risk. So, it is hypothesized that the low penetrance genes may also modify the risk for familial breast cancer. In the present case-control study, undertaken to examine the influence of polymorphisms of GSTs in familial and sporadic breast cancer susceptibility, 597 women including 222 sporadic breast cancer patients, 125 familial breast cancer patients and 250 females with no history of cancer as controls were genotyped by PCR based methods. Odds Ratios (ORs) and 95% Confidence Intervals (95%CIs) were calculated by unconditional logistic regression adjusted to age. Interestingly, GSTM1 deletion was found to be significantly associated only with familial breast cancer (OR = 2.0; 95%CI = 1.252-3.128) while GSTT1 was associated only with sporadic breast cancer (OR = 2.3; 95%CI = 1.336-3.970). GSTP1 Ile(105)Val polymorphism was associated neither with sporadic nor familial breast cancer susceptibility (P value > 0.05). The GST genotypes did not have any effect on the survival of both familial and sporadic breast cancer patients. However, familial breast cancer patients with GSTM1 null genotype had a relative risk of 0.42 (95%CI = 0.18-0.97) for an advanced disease stage. The results indicate that, in addition to the known high penetrance genes, certain low penetrance genes may also play a role, in the familial inheritance of breast cancer. It is also noticed that all the polymorphisms associated with sporadic breast cancer are not associated with familial breast cancer.     

Active and passive smoking, <Emphasis Type="Italic">IL6</Emphasis>, <Emphasis Type="Italic">ESR1</Emphasis>, and breast cancer risk

We evaluated the association between smoking and risk of breast cancer in non-Hispanic white (NHW) and Hispanic or American Indian (HAI) women living in the Southwestern United States. Data on lifetime exposure to active and passive smoke data were available from 1527 NHW cases and 1601 NHW controls; 798 HAI cases and 924 HAI controls. Interleukin 6 (IL6) and Estrogen Receptor alpha (ESR1) polymorphisms were assessed in conjunction with smoking. Pack-years of smoking (≥15) were associated with increased risk of pre-menopausal breast cancer among NHW women (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1–2. 4). Passive smoke increased risk of pre-menopausal breast cancer for HAI women (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1–3.1 everyone; OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2–4.5 nonsmokers). HAI pre-menopausal women who were exposed to 10+ h of passive smoke per week and had the rs2069832 IL6 GG genotype had over a fourfold increased risk of breast cancer (OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.5–12.8; P for interaction 0.01). Those with the ESR1 Xba1 AA genotype had a threefold increased risk of breast cancer if they smoked ≥15 pack-years relative to non-smokers (P interaction 0.01). These data suggest that breast cancer risk is associated with active and passive smoking.     

Large <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA1</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA2</Emphasis> genomic rearrangements in Danish high risk breast-ovarian cancer families

BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ-line mutations predispose to breast and ovarian cancer. Large genomic rearrangements of BRCA1 account for 0–36% of all disease causing mutations in various populations, while large genomic rearrangements in BRCA2 are more rare. We examined 642 East Danish breast and/or ovarian cancer patients in whom a deleterious mutation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 was not detected by sequencing using the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay. We identified 15 patients with 7 different genomic rearrangements, including a BRCA1 exon 5–7 deletion with a novel breakpoint, a BRCA1 exon 13 duplication, a BRCA1 exon 17–19 deletion, a BRCA1 exon 3–16 deletion, and a BRCA2 exon 20 deletion with a novel breakpoint as well as two novel BRCA1 exon 17–18 and BRCA1 exon 19 deletions. The large rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2 accounted for 9.2% (15/163) of all BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in East Denmark. Nine patients had the exon 3–16 deletion in BRCA1. By SNP analysis we find that the patients share a 5 Mb fragment of chromosome 17, including BRCA1, indicating that the exon 3–16 deletion represents a Danish founder mutation. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Higher occurrence of childhood cancer in families with germline mutations in <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA2</Emphasis>, MMR and <Emphasis Type="Italic">CDKN2A</Emphasis> genes

The contribution of hereditary factors for development of childhood tumors is limited to some few known syndromes associated with predominance of tumors in childhood. Occurrence of childhood tumors in hereditary cancer syndromes such as BRCA1/2 associated breast and ovarian cancer, DNA-mismatch repair (MMR) genes associated hereditary non polyposis colorectal cancer and CDKN2A associated familial malignant melanoma are very little studied. Herein we report the prevalence of childhood tumors (diagnosed ≤18 years of age) in families identified with mutation in the BRCA1/2, MMR and CDKN2A genes. Using pedigrees at the Regional Oncogenetic Clinic at Lund University Hospital, the prevalence of childhood cancer was estimated in families with mutations in the BRCA1 (n = 98), BRCA2 (n = 43) MMR (MLH1, MSH2 MSH6) (n = 31) and CDKN2A (n = 15) genes in comparison with population based control families (n = 854). Compared with the control group, a significantly higher prevalence of childhood cancer was found in families with mutations in BRCA2 (9.3% vs. 0.8% P = 0.001), MMR genes (19.4% vs. 0.8% P < 0.001) and CDKN2A (20.0% vs. 0.8% P < 0.001), but not in families with BRCA1 mutations (1.0% vs. 0.8% P = 0.6). Further analyses showed an increased risk for childhood tumors in families with mutations in BRCA2 (OR 12.4; 95% CI 3.5–44.1), MMR genes (OR 29.0; 95% CI 9.1–92.6), and CDKN2A (OR 30.2; 95% CI 7.0–131.1). This study suggests that the risk for childhood tumors is increased in families with germline mutations in the BRCA2, MMR and CDKN2A genes.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">IL6</Emphasis> genotypes and colon and rectal cancer

Inflammation appears to play a key role in the development of colorectal cancer (CRC). In this study we examine factors involved in the regulation of inflammation and risk of CRC. Data from a multi-center case–control study of colon (N = 1579 cases and N = 1977 controls) and rectal (N = 794 cases and N = 1005 controls) cancer were used to evaluate the association between the rs1800795 and rs1800796 IL6 polymorphisms and CRC. We evaluated the joint effects of IL6 single nucleotide polymorphisms and regular use of aspirin/NSAIDs and vitamin D receptor (VDR) genotype. Having a C allele of the rs1800796 IL6 polymorphisms and the GG genotype of the rs1800795 IL6 polymorphisms was associated with a statistically significantly reduced the risk of colon (OR 0.76 95% CI 0.57, 1.00), but not rectal (OR 1.49 95% CI 1.02,2.16) cancer. Both IL6 polymorphisms were associated with significant interaction with current use of aspirin/NSAIDs to alter risk of colon cancer: individuals with a C allele in either polymorphism who were current users of aspirin/NSAIDs had the lowest colon cancer risk. CRC risk also was associated with an interaction between VDR and IL6 genotypes that was modified by current use of aspirin/NSAIDs. This study provides further support for inflammation-related factors in the etiology of CRC. Other studies are needed to explore other genes in this and other inflammation-related pathways.     

Mutation analysis of <Emphasis Type="Italic">PALB2</Emphasis> in <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA1</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA2</Emphasis>-negative breast and/or ovarian cancer families from Eastern Ontario,Canada

Background

PALB2 has emerged as a breast cancer susceptibility gene. Mutations in PALB2 have been identified in almost all breast cancer populations studied to date, but the rarity of these mutations and lack of information regarding their penetrance makes genetic counseling for these families challenging. We studied BRCA1/2 -negative breast and/or ovarian cancer families to a) assess the contribution of PALB2 mutations in this series and b) identify clinical, pathological and family history characteristics that might make PALB2 screening more efficient.

Methods

The coding region of the PALB2 gene was analyzed in 175 probands with family histories of breast and/or ovarian cancer ascertained from a single Canadian institution in Eastern Ontario.

Results

We identified 2 probands with PALB2 mutations that are known or strongly considered to be pathogenic and 3 probands with missense mutations that are possibly pathogenic. One of the identified truncating mutations [c.3113G > A (p.Gly1000_Trp1038del – major product)], has been previously described while the other four mutations [c.3507_3508delTC (p.H1170Ffs*19), c.1846G > C (p.D616H), c.3418 T > G (p.W1140G), c.3287A > G (p.N1096S)] have not been previously reported. Loss of heterozygosity was detected in two breast tumors from one c.3507_3508delTC mutation carrier but not in other available tumors from that family or in tumors from carriers of other mutations.

Conclusions

PALB2 mutation screening identifies a small, but significant number of mutations in BRCA1/2 -negative breast and/or ovarian cancer families. We show that mutations are more likely to be found in families with three or more breast cancers as well as other BRCA2-related cancers. In our cohort, both clearly pathogenic mutations were identified in premenopausal breast cancer cases (2/77, 2.6%). Testing should be preferentially offered to affected women from such families.     

Predicting <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA1</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA2</Emphasis> gene mutation carriers: comparison of LAMBDA,BRCAPRO, Myriad II,and modified Couch models

Context Models have been developed to predict the probability that a person carries a detectable germline mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. Their relative performance in a clinical setting is unclear. Objective To compare the performance characteristics of four BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutation prediction models: LAMBDA, based on a checklist and scores developed from data on Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) women; BRCAPRO, a Bayesian computer program; modified Couch tables based on regression analyses; and Myriad II tables collated by Myriad Genetics Laboratories. Design and setting Family cancer history data were analyzed from 200 probands from the Mayo Clinic Familial Cancer Program, in a multispecialty tertiary care group practice. All probands had clinical testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations conducted in a single laboratory. Main outcomes measures For each model, performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) and by tests of accuracy and dispersion. Cases “missed” by one or more models (model predicted less than 10% probability of mutation when a mutation was actually found) were compared across models. Results All models gave similar areas under the ROC curve of 0.71 to 0.76. All models except LAMBDA substantially under-predicted the numbers of carriers. All models were too dispersed. Conclusions In terms of ranking, all prediction models performed reasonably well with similar performance characteristics. Model predictions were widely discrepant for some families. Review of cancer family histories by an experienced clinician continues to be vital to ensure that critical elements are not missed and that the most appropriate risk prediction figures are provided.     

Frequent but borderline methylation of<Emphasis Type="Italic"> p16</Emphasis><Superscript>INK4a</Superscript> and<Emphasis Type="Italic"> TIMP3</Emphasis> in medulloblastoma and sPNET revealed by quantitative analyses

Certain risk groups among tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) in children take an almost inevitably fatal course. The elucidation of molecular mechanisms offers hope for improved therapy. Aberrant methylation is common in malignant brain tumors of childhood and may have implications for stratification and therapy. Methylation of p16 ^INK4A, p14 ^ARF, TIMP3, CDH1, p15 ^INK4B and DAPK1 in medulloblastoma (MB) and ependymoma has been discussed controversially in the literature. DUTT1 and SOCS1 have not previously been analyzed. We examined methylation in MB, sPNET and ependymoma using methylation-specific PCR (MSP), quantitative Combined Bisulfite Restriction Analysis (COBRA) and direct and clone sequencing of bisulfite PCR products. We detected methylation of p16 ^INK4A (17/43), p14 ^ARF (11/42) and TIMP3 (9/44) in MB and others by MSP. CDH1 was not only methylated in MB (31/41), but also in normal controls. Evaluation of MSP results by quantitative COBRA and sequencing yielded methylation between the detection limits of COBRA (1%) and MSP (0.1%). Only p16 ^INK4A and TIMP3 were methylated consistently in medulloblastomas (p16 ^INK4A 14%, TIMP3 11%) and p16 ^INK4A also in anaplastic ependymomas (1/4 tumors). Methylation ranged from 1–5%. Evaluation of methylation using MSP has thus to be supplemented by quantitative methods. Our analyses raise the issue of the functional significance of low level methylation, which may disturb the delicate growth factor equilibrium within the cell. Therapeutic and diagnostic implications urge into depth analyses of methylation as a mechanism, which might fill some of the gaps of our understanding of brain tumor origin.     

The use of preventive measures among healthy women who carry a <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">BRCA1</Emphasis> or <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">BRCA2</Emphasis> mutation

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess women’s knowledge about tamoxifen, to examine the frequency of tamoxifen usage and other preventive measures in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, and to document women’s concerns about taking tamoxifen for chemoprevention.Methods: One hundred and twenty five women with known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation and with no prior diagnosis of breast or ovarian cancer were identified through the records of two large cancer genetics clinics. These women had been counseled about their cancer risk and various preventive options were discussed. At a time from two to 110 months following disclosure session, a questionnaire was sent by mail. Women were asked about their current and past use of tamoxifen, their knowledge of risks and benefits, their desire for additional information, and their experience with other preventive measures.Results: Eighty-one of 125 eligible women returned the questionnaire (64.8%). Ten women (12.3%) had used tamoxifen and eight women had used raloxifene (9.9%). Twenty-two women (27.2%) had undergone prophylactic mastectomy and 54 women (66.7%) had had an oophorectomy. Twelve women (14.8%) did not recall discussing tamoxifen. Thirty-five women (58.3%) said that their doctors had not provided them with sufficient information about tamoxifen to consider its use. Fear of side-effects was the most common reason for not taking tamoxifen.Conclusion: Although tamoxifen appears to be effective in preventing breast cancer in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, few women now take the drug compared to those who choose other preventive measures including surgery. Health care providers should provide accurate information about the risks and benefits of tamoxifen to allow women to make informed decisions.