Intra-ocular pressure changes following laryngeal mask airway insertion: a comparative study

We compared the effects of the Brain laryngeal mask airway with a tracheal tube on intra-ocular pressure. Propofol was used as induction agent and atracurium as relaxant. Twenty-six patients with normal intra-ocular pressure undergoing cataract surgery were randomly allocated to two groups. Group A ( n  = 13) had a laryngeal mask airway inserted and Group B ( n  = 13) had a tracheal tube inserted. Intra-ocular pressure was measured just before insertion of the airway, 20 s after insertion and at 2 min. In the laryngeal mask airway group there were no significant changes in mean intra-ocular pressure. In the tracheal tube group there was a significant rise in mean intra-ocular pressure at 20 s (p = 0.0056) which returned to pre-insertion levels at 2 min. We conclude that the laryngeal mask airway continues to have advantages over the tracheal tube for ophthalmic surgery despite the use of propofol and atracurium as anaesthetic agents.     

Intra-ocular pressure changes using the laryngeal mask airway and tracheal tube

Intra-ocular pressure was measured before and throughout airway establishment with either the laryngeal mask airway or tracheal tube. Similar measurements were made on removal of either airway and the amount of coughing noted in the first minute after removal. There was a significantly smaller increase in intra-ocular pressure (p less than 0.001) using the laryngeal mask airway, both on placement and removal, than with the tracheal tube. Postoperative coughing was significantly reduced using the laryngeal mask airway (p less than 0.001). There was a significantly greater rise in heart rate using the tracheal tube (p less than 0.01) probably related to an increased cardiovascular response. The laryngeal mask airway is recommended as an alternative to tracheal intubation in routine and emergency intra-ocular surgery.     

Electroencephalographic arousal response during tracheal intubation and laryngeal mask airway insertion after induction of anaesthesia with propofol

Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation, or insertion of a laryngeal mask airway may lead to an arousal response on the electroencephalogram. We studied whether more intense stimulation (laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation) causes a greater arousal response than less intense stimulation (laryngeal mask airway insertion). Thirty-four patients (ASA I-II) were anaesthetised with propofol 3 mg.kg-1, followed by vecuronium 0.15 mg.kg-1 and a propofol infusion of 10 mg.kg-1.h-1. Three minutes after induction of anaesthesia, either laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation (n = 18), or laryngeal mask airway insertion (n = 16) was performed. Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation caused a significantly greater increase in blood pressure (but not heart rate) than laryngeal mask airway insertion (p < 0.05). Electroencephalogram responses were not different. More intense stimulation does not cause a greater arousal response during propofol anaesthesia.     

The laryngeal mask airway: its features,effects and role

The laryngeal mask airway was designed as a new concept in airway management and has been gaining a firm position in anaesthetic practice. Numerous articles and letters about the device have been published in the last decade, but few large controlled trials have been performed. Despite widespread use, the definitive role of the laryngeal mask has yet to be established. In some situations, such as after failed tracheal intubation or in anaesthesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic or oral surgery, its use is controversial. There are a number of unresolved issues, for example the effect of the laryngeal mask on regurgitation and whether or not cricoid pressure prevents placement of the mask. We review the techniques of insertion, details of misplacement, and complications associated with the use of the laryngeal mask. We discuss the features and physiological effects of the device, including the changes in intra-cuff pressure during anaesthesia and effects on blood pressure, heart rate and intra-ocular pressure. We then attempt to clarify the role of the laryngeal mask in airway management during anaesthesia, based on the current knowledge, by discussing the advantages and disadvantages as well as the indications and contraindications of its use. Lastly we describe the use of the laryngeal mask in circumstances other than airway maintenance during anaesthesia: fibreoptic bronchoscopy, tracheal intubation through the mask and its use in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.     

General anaesthesia for ophthalmic surgery

The majority of ophthalmic surgeries are performed as day cases under topical or regional anaesthesia with or without intravenous sedation. However, general anaesthesia is necessary in certain circumstances e.g. local anaesthetic allergy or patients who are unable to cooperate or to lie flat or still. Patients for ophthalmic surgery are frequently elderly with multiple comorbidities, such as diabetes and hypertension. Patients with rare genetic syndromes may present for eye surgery. Therefore adequate preoperative evaluation and preparation will minimize perioperative complications. The goals of general anaesthesia are smooth induction and emergence, with stable intra-ocular pressure (IOP) and akinesia of the globe. These can be achieved with a combination of intravenous and inhalational agents with or without muscle relaxants and opiates. Use of the laryngeal mask airway has the advantage of causing a smaller rise in IOP on insertion and less coughing on emergence. Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil has the advantages of causing less postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), reduced stress response to airway intervention, rapid recovery and smooth emergence. Some eye procedures require special consideration, for example, strabismus and vitreoretinal surgery involves traction of the rectus muscles producing a higher incidence of oculocardiac reflex and PONV. Most ophthalmic surgery produces mild to moderate pain amenable to non-opioid analgesics. Intraoperative topical and regional anaesthesia reduce postoperative pain and opiate requirement. Open globe injury and a full stomach present unique challenges to prevent increase in IOP as well as protecting the airway.     

General anaesthesia for ophthalmic surgery

The majority of ophthalmic surgeries are performed as day cases under topical or regional anaesthesia with or without intravenous sedation. However, general anaesthesia is necessary in certain circumstances e.g. local anaesthetic allergy or patients who are unable to cooperate or to lie flat or still. Patients for ophthalmic surgery are frequently elderly with multiple comorbidities, such as diabetes and hypertension. Patients with rare genetic syndromes may present for eye surgery. Therefore adequate preoperative evaluation and preparation will minimize perioperative complications. The goals of general anaesthesia are smooth induction and emergence, with stable intra-ocular pressure (IOP) and akinesia of the globe. These can be achieved with a combination of intravenous and inhalational agents with or without muscle relaxants and opiates. Use of the laryngeal mask airway has the advantage of causing a smaller rise in IOP on insertion and less coughing on emergence. Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil has the advantages of causing less postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), reduced stress response to airway intervention, rapid recovery and smooth emergence. Some eye procedures require special consideration, for example, strabismus and vitreoretinal surgery involves traction of the rectus muscles producing a higher incidence of oculocardiac reflex and PONV. Most ophthalmic surgery produces mild to moderate pain amenable to non-opioid analgesics. Intraoperative topical and regional anaesthesia reduce postoperative pain and opiate requirement. Open globe injury and a full stomach present unique challenges to prevent increase in IOP as well as protecting the airway.     

Intratracheal intubation without muscle relaxant with the use of remifentanil-propofol]

OBJECTIVES: To assess tracheal intubation conditions after induction of anaesthesia with remifentanil and propofol, using itemized scoring criteria. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical, prospective, open, non comparative trial. PATIENTS: One hundred consecutive patients undergoing surgery not requiring muscle relaxation, during the study period extended over 12 months. METHODS: After premedication with lorazepam (2 mg) the day before and hydroxyzine (100 mg) one hour before surgery, anaesthesia was induced with remifentanil administered continuously with a syringe pump at a rate of 1.20 +/- 0.06 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 and propofol (3 mg.kg-1 IV bolus). The trachea was intubated two minutes later and mouth opening, glottis exposure, glottis opening, movements, additional anaesthetic agents and chest rigidity were recorded. RESULTS: Intubation conditions were excellent in 87% of patients, and the tube was inserted rapidly, within two minutes. However in 38% of patients the cuff inflation caused cough. In 13%, glottis opening was delayed and intubation required three minutes. A major decrease of arterial pressure and heart rate was recorded in 9 and 6% of patients respectively. CONCLUSION: Induction of anaesthesia using remifentanil and propofol allows satisfactory tracheal intubation without a muscle relaxant. However this technique is contraindicated: a) in patients with a full stomach, as intubation is not always successful at the first attempt; b) in patients scheduled to undergo neurosurgery or ophthalmic surgery, as tracheal intubation may elicit cough, increasing intra-cranial and intra-ocular pressure; c) in patients in poor circulatory status, as it decreases significantly arterial pressure and heart rate.     

Tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask in patients with unstable necks

BACKGROUND: In patients with unstable necks, the neck should be stabilized during induction of anaesthesia, but this may make tracheal intubation difficult. Awake intubation may produce straining, which could be detrimental to the unstable neck. METHODS: We studied 20 patients with unstable necks to examine the efficacy of insertion of the intubating laryngeal mask under conscious sedation (to minimize the possibility of losing a patent airway and to facilitate fibrescope-aided intubation) followed by tracheal intubation through the laryngeal mask after induction of anaesthesia (to reduce stress response to intubation). After the patient had been sedated with midazolam (up to 5 mg) and fentanyl (up to 100 microg), the intubating laryngeal mask was inserted. General anaesthesia was then induced with sevoflurane and tracheal intubation attempted. RESULTS: In all patients, tracheal intubation through the laryngeal mask succeeded without airway obstruction. Neither insertion of the mask under conscious sedation nor tracheal intubation after induction of anaesthesia caused straining, and only two patients moved upper extremities at intubation. Insertion of the laryngeal mask did not significantly alter blood pressure or heart rate. Tracheal intubation significantly increased blood pressure and heart rate, but the increase was considered to be small. CONCLUSIONS: In the patient with an unstable neck with a low risk of pulmonary aspiration, insertion of the intubating laryngeal mask while the patient is sedated may minimize difficulty in obtaining a patent airway before tracheal intubation and may facilitate a fibrescope-aided tracheal intubation; subsequent induction of anaesthesia before tracheal intubation may minimize stress response to intubation.     

A French survey of paediatric airway management use in tonsillectomy and appendicectomy

BACKGROUND: There are no epidemiological data describing tracheal intubation and laryngeal mask airway (LMATM) use in paediatric anaesthesia. This analysis focused on the factors leading to the indication for an airway management procedure, i.e. tracheal intubation and laryngeal mask airway vs face mask during general anaesthesia for tonsillectomy and appendicectomy. METHODS: The data were recorded in the French survey of Practical Anaesthesia performed in 1996. Two main types of surgical procedures were selected: tonsillectomy and appendicectomy because of the number of patients and the need to use an invasive airway management technique. RESULTS: During a 1-year period, 627 anaesthetics for appendicectomy and 653 anaesthetics for tonsillectomy were recorded in the sample under consideration. Tracheal intubation or laryngeal mask airway was undertaken in 66% of tonsillectomies and 84% of appendicectomies. Univariate analysis showed that tracheal intubation/laryngeal mask were used significantly more often in older children, with long duration of anaesthesia, in nonambulatory procedures and in procedures performed at an academic centre. When these variables were included in a multivariate analysis, the duration of anaesthesia over 30 min was a factor linked to the use of tracheal intubation/laryngeal mask airway for the two types of surgery (P < 0.0001). For tonsillectomy, inpatients were 2.9 times more likely to be intubated (or have an laryngeal mask airway) than were outpatients. For appendicectomy, older children were 3.4 times more likely to be intubated (or have an laryngeal mask airway) than younger children. CONCLUSIONS: This large French survey shows that the use of tracheal intubation/laryngeal mask airway in this country is primarily related to a predicted long duration of anaesthesia.     

Intra-ocular pressure changes associated with intubation with the intubating laryngeal mask airway compared with conventional laryngoscopy

This open, prospective, randomised study was designed to evaluate the changes in intra-ocular pressure and haemodynamics after tracheal intubation using either the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) or direct laryngoscopy. Sixty adult patients, ASA physical status 1 or 2 with normal intra-ocular pressure were randomly allocated to one of the two techniques. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol followed by rocuronium. Tracheal intubation was performed using either the ILMA or Macintosh laryngoscope. Intra-ocular pressure, heart rate and blood pressure were measured immediately before and after tracheal intubation and then minutely for five minutes. In the laryngoscopy group there was a significant increase in intra-ocular pressure (from 7.2+/-1.4 to 16.8+/-5.3 mmHg, P<0.01), which did not return to pre-intubation levels within five minutes, and also in mean arterial pressure after tracheal intubation, which returned to baseline levels after five minutes. In the ILMA group there were no significant changes in intra-ocular pressure (from 7.6+/-1.8 to 10.4+/-2.8 mmHg, P >0.05) or mean arterial pressure after tracheal intubation. Time to successful intubation was longer with the ILMA, 56.8+/-7.8 seconds, compared with the laryngoscopy group, 33+/-3.6 seconds (P<0.01). Mucosal trauma was more frequent with the ILMA (eight of 30) compared with the laryngoscopy group (three of 30) (P<0.01). The postoperative complications were comparable. In terms of minimising increases in intra-ocular pressure and blood pressure, we conclude that the ILMA has an advantage over direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation.     

Fiberoptisch unterstützte endotracheale Intubation durch die Larynxmaske im Kindesalter

Fibre optic-assisted tracheal intubation through the laryngeal mask airway is a simple and safe procedure for securing the airway in the paediatric patient with unexpected and known difficult tracheal intubation. Therefore, fibre optic-assisted tracheal intubation through the laryngeal mask airway represents a standard airway technique and must be part of clinical education and also regular training. However, the removal of the laryngeal mask airway over the tracheal tube is impaired by the short length of the tracheal tube, easily resulting in tube dislocation from the trachea. Among several techniques to overcome this problem, the Cook airway exchange catheter offers a reliable method not only for safe removal of the laryngeal mask over the tracheal tube but also for insertion of an adequate tracheal tube, particularly in paediatric patients. This is particularly important for cuffed tubes as the pilot balloon of the cuffed tube is too large to pass through laryngeal mask airway tubes size 2.5 and smaller. This presentation demonstrates fibre optic-assisted tracheal intubation through the laryngeal mask airway in children step-by-step and discusses its clinical implications. A list with compatible sizes of laryngeal mask airways, tracheal tubes and airway exchange catheters is also provided.     

The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is an effective alternative to laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation for gynaecological laparoscopy

We tested the hypothesis that the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation for gynaecological laparoscopy. One-hundred and eighty consecutive patients (ASA grade 1-2, aged 18-80 y) were divided into two equal-sized groups for airway management with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway or tracheal tube. Induction was with fentanyl/propofol, maintenance with sevoflurane and muscle relaxation with atracurium. The following primary variables were tested: time to achieve an effective airway, ventilatory capability, peak airway pressure before and after pneumoperitoneum, duration of surgery and pneumoperitoneum and haemodynamic responses. Data about gastric size, airway trauma and sore throat were collected. The number of attempts for successful insertion were similar but effective airway time was shorter for the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (20 +/- 2s vs 37 +/- 3 s, P < 0.001). All devices were successfully inserted within three attempts. There was no episode of failed ventilation or hypoxia. The haemodynamic stress responses to insertion and removal were greater for the tracheal tube than the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. The duration of surgery, duration of pneumoperitoneum and intra-abdominal pressures were similar Gastric size was similar at the start and end of surgery. There were no differences in the frequency of complications or sore throat. We conclude that the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is a similarly effective airway device to conventional laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation for gynaecological laparoscopy, but is more rapidly inserted and associated with an attenuated haemodynamic response to insertion and removal.     

Effect of tracheal intubation or laryngeal mask airway insertion on intraocular pressure using balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane and remifentanil.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To study the effect of tracheal intubation or laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion on intraocular pressure (IOP) in strabismus patients undergoing balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane and remifentanil. DESIGN: Open, prospective, randomized study. SETTING: Tertiary care academic medical institution. PATIENTS: 40 adult ASA physical status I and II patients scheduled for elective strabismus surgery. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive either tracheal intubation or LMA insertion following mask induction with sevoflurane in combination with IV remifentanil. MEASUREMENTS: Intraocular pressure, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR) were measured before induction, immediately following induction, and after airway insertion. MAIN RESULTS: Intraocular pressure after tracheal intubation or LMA insertion did not differ significantly from preoperative baseline values. Mean arterial pressure and HR did not significantly differ between groups at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: Remifentanil and sevoflurane are not associated with an increase in IOP response during tracheal intubation or LMA insertion above baseline in healthy patients undergoing ophthalmic surgery.     

喉罩通气全麻应用于老年人腹部手术的临床观察

目的 探讨气管捕管和喉罩通气道用于老年全身麻醉对血液动力学的影响.方法 将40例老年全麻腹部手术患者随机分为2组.喉罩组(L组):全麻诱导后置入喉罩;插管组(M组):全麻后喉镜下气管插管维持通气.分别记录诱导前(T0)、簧喉罩或气管导管前(T1).喉罩置人或气插管即刻(T2),之后2min(T3),4min(T4),6...     

Light-guided tracheal intubation using a prototype illuminated flexible catheter through the intubating laryngeal mask.

We evaluated the efficacy of a newly developed prototype illuminated flexible catheter to facilitate tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask and compared this light-guided technique with the conventional blind tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask. The illuminated flexible catheter consists of a completely flexible thin plastic catheter, a bulb attached to its distal end, a 15-mm concentric adapter at its proximal end connected with a battery and a power switch. The device is placed into a silicone tracheal tube in such a way that the bulb protrudes from the distal end of the tracheal tube. One hundred adult patients, ASA I-III, scheduled to undergo propofol/fentanyl/atracurium anaesthesia for elective surgery were studied. All participants underwent a randomized double comparative cross over trial with respect to the tracheal intubation technique through the intubating laryngeal mask. The light guided tracheal intubation was performed as follows; the tracheal tube preloaded with the illuminated flexible catheter was inserted through the intubating laryngeal mask and by observing the glow in the neck was advanced into the trachea. Whenever resistance was felt during insertion, appropriate adjusting manoeuvres were performed. The intubating laryngeal mask was inserted successfully in all patients. The success rate for the blind and light-guided technique was 91% and 100%, respectively (P = 0.003). The mean (+/- SD) duration including appropriate intubating laryngeal mask placement and tracheal intubation, was significantly lower in the light-guided tracheal intubation technique, than with the blind tracheal intubation (31 +/- 8 s vs. 43 +/- 18 s; P < 0.0001). We conclude that the use of an illuminated flexible catheter carries advantages either in optimizing the intubating laryngeal mask position in the laryngopharynx or in achieving a quick and safe light-guided advancement from laryngopharynx into the trachea.     

Comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope vs. the intubating laryngeal mask for females with normal airways

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In this randomized clinical study, we compared the intubation success rates of the intubating laryngeal mask airway with the GlideScope in patients with normal airways. The primary hypothesis was that the intubating laryngeal mask airway was equally effective as the GlideScope in terms of successful intubation times. METHODS: Sixty ASA I and II adult patients undergoing elective gynaecological surgery were randomly allocated into either the intubating laryngeal mask airway group or the GlideScope group. After a standard anaesthetic intravenous induction, orotracheal intubation was performed. Time taken for successful tracheal intubation, ease of device insertion, difficulty of tracheal intubation, manoeuvres needed to aid tracheal intubation, number of intubation attempts, haemodynamic changes every 2.5 min interval for 5 min and complications during tracheal intubation were recorded. RESULTS: Time to successful intubation was longer (mean 68.4 s +/- 23.5 vs. 35.7 s +/- 10.7; P < 0.05), mean difficulty score was higher (mean 16.7 +/- 16.3 vs. 7.3 +/- 13.1; P < 0.05) and more intubation attempts were required in the intubating laryngeal mask airway group. CONCLUSION: The GlideScope improved intubation time and difficulty score for tracheal intubation when compared with the intubating laryngeal mask airway in our patients. Blind intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway offers no advantages over the GlideScope in patients with normal airways. Despite its limitations, the intubating laryngeal mask airway is a valuable adjunct, especially in cases of difficult airway management when it can provide ventilation in between intubation attempts.     

Comparison of times to achieve tracheal intubation with three techniques using the laryngeal or intubating laryngeal mask airway

We compared the times to intubate the trachea using three techniques in 60 healthy patients with normal airways: (i) fibreoptic intubation with a 6.0-mm reinforced tracheal tube through a standard laryngeal mask airway (laryngeal mask-fibreoptic group); (ii) fibreoptic intubation with a dedicated 7.0-mm silicone tracheal tube through the intubating laryngeal mask airway (intubating laryngeal mask-fibreoptic group); (iii) blind intubation with the dedicated 7.0-mm silicone tracheal tube through the intubating laryngeal mask airway (intubating laryngeal mask-blind group). Mean (SD) total intubation times were significantly shorter in the intubating laryngeal mask-blind group (49 (20) s) than in either of the other two groups (intubating laryngeal mask-fibreoptic 74 (21) s; laryngeal mask-fibreoptic group 75 (36) s; p < 0.001). However, intubation at the first attempt was less successful with the intubating laryngeal mask-blind technique (15/20 (75%)) than in the other two groups (intubating laryngeal mask-fibreoptic 19/20 (95%) and laryngeal mask-fibreoptic 16/20 (80%)) although these differences were not statistically significant. We conclude that in this patient group, all three techniques yield acceptable results. If there is a choice of techniques available, the intubating laryngeal mask-blind technique would result in the shortest intubation time.     

Use of an illuminated flexible catheter for light-guided tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask by nurses

We evaluated the ability of inexperienced personnel in using a prototype illuminated flexible catheter to assist tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask in anaesthetised, paralysed patients. The device consists of a completely flexible thin plastic catheter, a bulb attached to its distal end and a 15-mm concentric adapter at its proximal end. The illuminated catheter is placed into a straight silicone tracheal tube in such a way that the bulb is placed at the distal end of the tracheal tube. Six nurses inexperienced in tracheal intubation followed a 2-hr training program by using the device through the intubating laryngeal mask in a mannequin and then intubated 10 patients each, with instruction from an anaesthetist. All patients (n=60) were ASA 1-2, scheduled to undergo general anaesthesia for elective surgery. After fentanyl/propofol induction the intubating laryngeal mask was inserted. When an adequate airway was established, patients received atracurium and the endotracheal tube preloaded with the device was inserted through the intubating laryngeal mask and by observing the glow in the neck was advanced into the trachea. The final outcome and the duration of the procedure were recorded. The intubating laryngeal mask was inserted successfully in all patients. The success rate of intubation was 57/60 (95%); 38 patients at first attempt and 19 after two or three attempts. The mean (+/-SD) duration of the procedure in the first five patients in the series of each nurse was 74+/-40 s while in the last five patients it was diminished to 52+/-23 s (P=0.01). We conclude that the described methodology has the potential for more widespread use of tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask even by inexperienced personnel.     

The laryngeal tube for difficult airway management: a prospective investigation in patients with pharyngeal and laryngeal tumours

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Since the introduction of the laryngeal mask into clinical practice, various additional supraglottic ventilatory devices have been developed. Although it has been demonstrated that the laryngeal tube is an effective airway device during positive pressure ventilation no clinical study has been performed thus far regarding its use in patients with predicted ventilation and intubation difficulties. METHODS: The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the use of the laryngeal tube for temporary oxygenation and ventilation in adult patients with supraglottic airway tumours scheduled to undergo a pharyngeal-laryngeal oesophagoscopy and bronchoscopy under general anaesthesia. In addition to our standard airway management with face mask ventilation and rigid bronchoscopy, all patients were temporarily ventilated with an laryngeal tube. Also, in patients requiring laryngeal biopsies, endotracheal intubation was performed with a 6.0 mm microlaryngeal tracheal tube. Minute ventilation volumes, tidal volumes, ventilation pressures, end-expiratory CO2 concentration, oxygen saturation and arterial blood gas samples were measured. RESULTS: From 54 enrolled patients only patients with relevant tumour masses were evaluated (n = 23). Mask ventilation was performed without difficulty in 15 of 23 patients. Mechanical ventilation with the laryngeal tube was possible in 22 of 23 patients with an audible leak present in three. Conventional endotracheal intubation was successfully performed in 19 of 23 patients. During face mask ventilation, minute volume, tidal volume, ventilation pressure, end-tidal CO2, oxygen saturation and arterial PO2 were significantly lower and PCO2 significantly higher (P < 0.05, paired t-test). No statistically significant differences were noted between the laryngeal tube and the microlaryngeal tracheal tube. CONCLUSIONS: The possibility of difficult ventilation and intubation must always be considered, in patients with supraglottic airway tumours. In these cases, the laryngeal tube can be considered for routine airway management and may be useful in the 'cannot-intubate' situation although difficulties should be anticipated in patients with previous irradiation, specifically of the throat area.     

Intermittent positive pressure ventilation through a laryngeal mask airway. Is a nasogastric tube useful?

A nasogastric tube was used to aspirate air insufflated into the stomach during intermittent positive pressure ventilation through a laryngeal mask airway and a tracheal tube. No difference was found in the amount aspirated between patients with a tracheal tube, a laryngeal mask airway with the nasogastric tube closed or a laryngeal mask airway with the nasogastric tube open, when the nasogastric tube was aspirated at 15 min intervals for the first hour of anaesthesia.