Results of 3,668 primary total hip replacements for primary osteoarthritis in patients under the age of 55 years

Background and purpose

In a previous study based on the Finnish Arthroplasty Register, the survival of cementless stems was better than that of cemented stems in younger patients. However, the survival of cementless cups was poor due to osteolysis. In the present study, we analyzed population-based survival rates of the cemented and cementless total hip replacements in patients under the age of 55 years with primary osteoarthritis in Finland.

Patients and methods

3,668 implants fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The previous data included years 1980–2001, whereas the current study includes years 1987–2006. The implants were classified in 3 groups: (1) implants with a cementless, straight, proximally circumferentially porous-coated stem and a porous-coated press-fit cup (cementless group 1); (2) implants with a cementless, anatomic, proximally circumferentially porous-coated stem, with or without hydroxyapatite, and a porous-coated press-fit cup with or without hydroxyapatite (cementless group 2); and (3) a cemented stem combined with a cemented all-polyethylene cup (the cemented group). Analyses were performed separately for 2 time periods: those operated 1987–1996 and those operated 1997–2006.

Results

The 15-year survival for any reason of cementless total hip replacement (THR) group 1 operated on 1987–1996 (62%; 95% CI: 57–67) and cementless group 2 (58%; CI: 52–66) operated on during the same time period was worse than that of cemented THRs (71%; CI: 62–80), although the difference was not statistically significant. The revision risk for aseptic loosening of cementless stem group 1 operated on 1987–1996 (0.49; CI: 0.32–0.74) was lower than that for aseptic loosening of cemented stems (p = 0.001).

Interpretation

Excessive wear of the polyethylene liner resulted in numerous revisions of modular cementless cups. The outcomes of total hip arthroplasty appear to have been relatively unsatisfactory for younger patients in Finland.Only a few register-based studies have yielded results of THA for primary osteoarthritis in younger patients at a population-based level (Havelin et al. 2000, Malchau et al. 2002, Eskelinen et al. 2005, 2006). In patients under the age of 55 years, data from population-based studies have suggested that the survival of cementless, proximally porous-coated stems can be as good as that of cemented stems (Havelin et al. 2000, Eskelinen et al. 2005). However, it has not been clear whether cementless cups perform as well as cemented cups in younger patients.On the basis of the Finnish Arthroplasty Register, we evaluated population-based data on the survival of primary total hip replacements performed for primary osteoarthritis in patients under the age of 55 years. The data including years 1980–2001 has been published earlier (Eskelinen et al. 2005), whereas the current study includes data from 1987 to 2006.     

Total hip arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis in younger patients: 2,557 replacements in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register followed for 0–24 years

Background?The results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in young patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been reported in only a few studies. On a nationwide level, the outcome of THA in these patients is unknown. We evaluated the population-based survival of THA in patients under 55 years of age with RA and factors affecting the survival.

Patients?Between 1980 and 2003, 2,557 primary THAs performed for RA in patients less than 55 years of age were reported to the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.

Results?Proximally circumferentially porous-coated uncemented stems had a 15-year survival rate of 89% (95% CI 83–94) with aseptic loosening as endpoint. The risk of stem revision due to aseptic loosening was higher with cemented stems than with proximally porouscoated uncemented stems implanted during the same period (RR 2.4; p < 0.001). In contrast, Cox regression analysis showed that the risk of cup revision was significantly higher for all uncemented cup concepts than for all-polyethylene cemented cups with any cup revision as endpoint. There were no significant differences in survival between the THR concepts.

Interpretations?Uncemented proximally circumferentially porous-coated stems and cemented all-poly-ethylene cups are currently the implants of choice for young patients with RA.     

Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years

BACKGROUND: Many studies have found a higher risk of revision after hip arthroplasty in younger patients. We evaluated the population-based survival of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients under 55 years of age and the factors affecting survival. METHODS: The Finnish Arthroplasty Register was established in 1980, and 74,492 primary THAs were entered into the register between 1980 and 2001. 4,661 of these were evaluated, all of which had been performed for primary osteoarthrosis on patients under 55 years of age. RESULTS: Proximally circumferentially porous-coated uncemented stems implanted between 1991 and 2001 had a 10-year survival rate of 99 (95% CI 98.5-99.6)% with aseptic loosening as endpoint. The risk of stem revision due to aseptic loosening was higher in cemented stems than in proximally porous-coated (RR 5.5, p < 0.001) or HA-coated (RR 6.6, p = 0.01) uncemented stems implanted during the same period. According to Cox regression analysis of cups implanted 1991-2001, the risk of revision for all-polyethylene cemented cups was 3.0 times as high as that for press-fit porous-coated uncemented cups with aseptic loosening as endpoint (p = 0.01). However, when the endpoint was defined as any revision (including exchange of liner), there was no longer any difference between these two concepts, the 10-year survival rates being 94 (92.1-95.5)% for press-fit porous-coated uncemented cups and 93 (88.5-97.6)% for all-polyethylene cemented cups (p = 0.9). INTERPRETATION: Modern uncemented stems seem to have better resistance to aseptic loosening than cemented stems in younger patients. Thus, for younger patients, uncemented proximally circumferentially porous- and HA-coated stems are the implants of choice. Press-fit porous- and HA-coated uncemented cups may have better endurance against aseptic loosening than cemented cups in younger patients. However, when all revisions (including exchange of liner) are taken into account, the survival of modern uncemented cups is no better than that of all-poly cemented cups.     

Total hip arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis in younger patients: 2,557 replacements in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register followed for 0-24 years

BACKGROUND: The results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in young patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been reported in only a few studies. On a nationwide level, the outcome of THA in these patients is unknown. We evaluated the population-based survival of THA in patients under 55 years of age with RA and factors affecting the survival. PATIENTS: Between 1980 and 2003, 2,557 primary THAs performed for RA in patients less than 55 years of age were reported to the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. RESULTS: Proximally circumferentially porous-coated uncemented stems had a 15-year survival rate of 89% (95% CI 83-94) with aseptic loosening as endpoint. The risk of stem revision due to aseptic loosening was higher with cemented stems than with proximally porouscoated uncemented stems implanted during the same period (RR 2.4; p < 0.001). In contrast, Cox regression analysis showed that the risk of cup revision was significantly higher for all uncemented cup concepts than for all-polyethylene cemented cups with any cup revision as endpoint. There were no significant differences in survival between the THR concepts. INTERPRETATIONS: Uncemented proximally circumferentially porous-coated stems and cemented all-poly-ethylene cups are currently the implants of choice for young patients with RA.     

In vivo implant fixation of carbon fiber‐reinforced PEEK hip prostheses in an ovine model

Carbon fiber‐reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR/PEEK) is theoretically suitable as a material for use in hip prostheses, offering excellent biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and the absence of metal ions. To evaluate in vivo fixation methods of CFR/PEEK hip prostheses in bone, we examined radiographic and histological results for cementless or cemented CFR/PEEK hip prostheses in an ovine model with implantation up to 52 weeks. CFR/PEEK cups and stems with rough‐textured surfaces plus hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings for cementless fixation and CFR/PEEK cups and stems without HA coating for cement fixation were manufactured based on ovine computed tomography (CT) data. Unilateral total hip arthroplasty was performed using cementless or cemented CFR/PEEK hip prostheses. Five cementless cups and stems and six cemented cups and stems were evaluated. On the femoral side, all cementless stems demonstrated bony ongrowth fixation and all cemented stems demonstrated stable fixation without any gaps at both the bone‐cement and cement‐stem interfaces. All cementless cases and four of the six cemented cases showed minimal stress shielding. On the acetabular side, two of the five cementless cups demonstrated bony ongrowth fixation. Our results suggest that both cementless and cemented CFR/PEEK stems work well for fixation. Cup fixation may be difficult for both cementless and cemented types in this ovine model, but bone ongrowth fixation on the cup was first seen in two cementless cases. Cementless fixation can be achieved using HA‐coated CFR/PEEK implants, even under load‐bearing conditions. © 2012 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 31: 485–492, 2013     

Comparison of allograft-prosthetic composite reconstruction and modular prosthetic replacement in proximal femur bone tumors: Functional assessment by gait analysis in 20 patients

Background?In cemented THA, aseptic loosening of the cup is more common than loosening of the stem, while periprosthetic osteolysis of the socket resulting in difficult reconstruction problems has emerged as the most significant problem with cementless cup fixation.

Patients and methods?90 patients (96 hips) scheduled for THA were stratified in three groups according to the method of fixation of the acetabular component: acrylic bone cement with fluoride (Cemex-F), porous-coated press-fit cup with ceramic coating (Trilogy, uncemented) and acrylic cement with gentamicin (Palacos). All patients received the Spectron EF stem. Acetabular bone mineral density was measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) 1 week postoperatively, and after 12 and 24 months. The periprosthetic BMD was evaluated in 5 ROIs positioned around the acetabular component.

Results?In the uncemented sockets, the BMD had decreased proximally and medially to the cup after 2 years. The difference was significant in the proximal region as compared to the control group (Palacos). No difference was noted between the 2 groups with cemented components after 2 years. Stepwise linear regression analysis showed that loss of periprosthetic BMD in the proximal high-pressure region after 2 years increased with higher postoperative BMD and when the uncemented design had been used.

Interpretation?Contrary to previous studies of cemented stems, the use of fluoride cement did not influence the periprosthetic BMD 2 years after the examination. Increased loss of BMD with use of uncemented press-fit cups in the region in which osteolytic lesions are commonly found suggests that stress shielding may initiate the development of this complication. Longer follow-up will, however, be necessary to substantiate this hypothesis.     

Is reverse hybrid hip replacement the solution?: 3,963 primary hip replacements with cemented cup and uncemented stem,from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register

Background and purpose

Reverse hybrid hip replacement uses a cemented all-polyethylene cup and an uncemented stem. Despite increasing use of this method in Scandinavia, there has been very little documentation of results. We have therefore analyzed the results from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR), with up to 10 years of follow-up.

Patients and methods

The NAR has been collecting data on total hip replacement (THR) since 1987. Reverse hybrid hip replacements were used mainly from 2000. We extracted data on reverse hybrid THR from this year onward until December 31, 2009, and compared the results with those from cemented implants over the same period. Specific cup/stem combinations involving 100 cases or more were selected. In addition, only combinations that were taken into use in 2005 or earlier were included. 3,963 operations in 3,630 patients were included. We used the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis for estimation of prosthesis survival and relative risk of revision. The main endpoint was revision for any cause, but we also performed specific analyses on different reasons for revision.

Results

We found equal survival to that from cemented THR at 5 years (cemented: 97.0% (95% CI: 96.8–97.2); reverse hybrid: 96.7% (96.0–97.4)) and at 7 years (cemented: 96.0% (95.7–96.2); reverse hybrid: 95.6% (94.4–96.7)). Adjusted relative risk of revision of the reverse hybrids was 1.1 (0.9–1.4). In patients under 60 years of age, we found similar survival of the 2 groups at 5 and 7 years, with an adjusted relative risk of revision of reverse hybrids of 0.9 (0.6–1.3) compared to cemented implants.

Interpretation

With a follow-up of up to 10 years, reverse hybrid THRs performed well, and similarly to all-cemented THRs from the same time period. The reverse hybrid method might therefore be an alternative to all-cemented THR. Longer follow-up time is needed to evaluate whether reverse hybrid hip replacement has any advantages over all-cemented THR.The reverse hybrid method (also known as “inverse hybrid”) uses a cemented all-polyethylene cup in combination with an uncemented stem. This method is partly based on good clinical results of cemented cups and of some uncemented stems in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR) (Havelin et al. 2000a,b, Hallan et al. 2007). The register has also shown that some uncemented femoral stems may have better long–term results (> 10 years) than cemented stems in patients 60 years of age or younger. Based on these findings, the NAR suggested 10 years ago that the use of cemented cups in combination with uncemented stems might be justified in young patients (Havelin et al. 2000a). In the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, the performance of uncemented THR was found to be inferior to that of cemented THR (Hailer et al. 2010). The authors of that study found that cemented cups performed better than uncemented cups and that uncemented femoral stems had better survival than cemented stems, with aseptic loosening as endpoint. In the Finnish Arthroplasty Registry, Mäkelä et al. (2010) found better long-term survival regarding aseptic loosening for the best performing types of cementless stems compared to the cemented reference group, in the age group 55–74 years.McNally et al. (2000) studied survival of the Furlong HA coated femoral stem in combination with a cemented ultra-high-density polyethylene cup at 10–11 years, and found values of 99% for the stem and 95% for the cup. Alho et al. (2000) reported results with cemented Lubinus cups and uncemented Furlong stems, and they also pointed out the possibility of using the principle of reverse hybrid arthroplasty. We are not aware of any other reports on the reverse hybrid method.In a reverse hybrid THR, an uncemented stem and a modular head are most often combined with a cemented cup of another name or from another company. Combining implants that are not designed to fit each other might theoretically lead to unexpected complications such as increased wear, loosening, or dislocation. This concern was raised by the NAR already in their report from 2005 (Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 2005). As the use of reverse hybrids is increasing, we decided to evaluate the short- to medium-term results with this concept and to compare them with those from all-cemented THRs, using data from the NAR.     

Comparison of total hip arthroplasty performed with and without cement: a randomized trial. A concise follow-up, at twenty years, of previous reports

Total hip arthroplasty has been associated with excellent implant survival rates, but debate remains concerning the best fixation method for the components. A randomized controlled trial, which included 250 patients (mean age, sixty-four years) with osteoarthritis who were managed with total hip arthroplasty between October 1987 and January 1992, was conducted to compare the results of fixation with and without cement. Patients were followed for a mean of twenty years (range, seventeen to twenty-one years). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis at twenty years revealed significantly lower survival rates for cemented implants as compared with cementless implants. The cementless tapered stem had an extremely good survival rate of 99%. Radiographs showed evidence of mild stress-shielding around 95% of the cemented stems and 88% of the cementless stems; stress-shielding of grade 3 or greater was seen around the remaining 12% of the cementless stems.     

Survival analysis of the cemented SPII stem

The aim of this study was to evaluate the survivorship of cemented stems for hip replacement. From March 1989 to October 1991, 98 patients underwent total hip arthroplasty using the Lubinus SPII stem. The preoperative diagnoses included 73 cases of osteoarthritis, 17 fractures of the femoral neck, and 8 cases of aseptic loosening. The adopted acetabular cups were: in 59 cases a screwed cup V-Thabe (Waldemar Link, Hamburg, Germany); in 5 cases the press-fit cup Mallory-head (Biomet, Inc., Warsaw, IN, USA); in 3 cases a Muller cemented cup; and in 2 cases a cemented cup (Waldemar Link). In the 17 cases of fracture, a hemispherical biarticular cup was employed. The SPII (Waldemar Link) stem is made of a chromecobalt alloy; it is smooth and 150-mm long. Its shape anatomically reproduces the curves of the femoral shaft. The neck had anatomical anteversion for the right and left femurs, and an inclination of 135°. Cementation was performed using CMW3 cement, mixed under vacuum, and injected with a needle after positioning an intramedullary plug. The survivorship of 98 implants, was evaluated after 10 years. The survival rate was 98%. The Lubinus SPII prosthetic stem shows a high rate of survival. The influencing factors of this good outcome are the prosthetic design, the improvement in cementation techniques, and after all a good surgical technique. Received: 5 June 2000/Accepted: 29 June 2000     

Changes in tibial bone mass after primary cementless and revision cementless total hip arthroplasty in canine models

The purpose of this study was to examine right-left differences in tibial bone mass after unilateral (left) cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). Of 39 dogs with THAs, 9 had primary cementless porous-coated femoral stems for 6 months and 15 had similar stems for 2 years. Five dogs had aseptically failed cemented hips, and 10 had aseptically failed cemented hips that were revised with cementless porous-coated femoral stems (5 without bone graft and 5 with autogenous bone graft). These animals were sacrificed 6 months after the revision surgery. The primary cementless dogs showed no right-left difference in tibial bone mineral content (BMC) or cortical bone cross-sectional geometry after 6 months, but after 2 years there was a distal right-left difference in BMC of 6% caused by expansion of the medullary canal in the tibia of the operated limb. Tibial BMC was more than 20% lower in the operated limb of the failed cemented dogs, approximately 15% lower in the nongrafted group, and 7% lower in the grafted group. The right-left tibial difference in BMC in the 2-year primary cementless group is most probably because of subclinical disuse of the operated limb. Among the dogs with failed cemented stems, the lower right-left difference in the two revised groups compared with the non-revised group suggests that improved limb function after cementless revision THA may cause gain of previously lost bone.     

Different loss of BMD using uncemented press-fit and whole polyethylene cups fixed with cement: repeated DXA studies in 96 hips randomized to 3 types of fixation

Background In cemented THA, aseptic loosening of the cup is more common than loosening of the stem, while periprosthetic osteolysis of the socket resulting in difficult reconstruction problems has emerged as the most significant problem with cementless cup fixation.

Patients and methods 90 patients (96 hips) scheduled for THA were stratified in three groups according to the method of fixation of the acetabular component: acrylic bone cement with fluoride (Cemex-F), porous-coated press-fit cup with ceramic coating (Trilogy, uncemented) and acrylic cement with gentamicin (Palacos). All patients received the Spectron EF stem. Acetabular bone mineral density was measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) 1 week postoperatively, and after 12 and 24 months. The periprosthetic BMD was evaluated in 5 ROIs positioned around the acetabular component.

Results In the uncemented sockets, the BMD had decreased proximally and medially to the cup after 2 years. The difference was significant in the proximal region as compared to the control group (Palacos). No difference was noted between the 2 groups with cemented components after 2 years. Stepwise linear regression analysis showed that loss of periprosthetic BMD in the proximal high-pressure region after 2 years increased with higher postoperative BMD and when the uncemented design had been used.

Interpretation Contrary to previous studies of cemented stems, the use of fluoride cement did not influence the periprosthetic BMD 2 years after the examination. Increased loss of BMD with use of uncemented press-fit cups in the region in which osteolytic lesions are commonly found suggests that stress shielding may initiate the development of this complication. Longer follow-up will, however, be necessary to substantiate this hypothesis.     

Revision total hip arthroplasty in juvenile chronic arthritis: 17 revisions in 11 patients followed for 4–12 years

Background Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with juvenile chronic arthritis (JCA) is complicated by the young age of the patient, poor bone stock and small physical proportions. We report the complications and outcome of a prospective series of 17 revision THAs in Charnley class C JCA patients.

Methods 15 acetabular components and 10 femoral components were revised. 13 cementless cups, 2 reconstruction/roof rings and cemented cups, and 4 cemented and 6 cementless femoral stems were implanted. 2 proximal femoral allografts and 1 strut allograft were used. Age at revision was 32 (21–53) years. Follow-up averaged 7 (4–12) years.

Results 2 patients with cemented femoral stems developed loosening, osteolysis and fracture. Both were successfully revised to long-stem cementless implants with strut/proximal femoral allografts. 1 loose, worn cementless cup with osteolysis was revised. 1 patient with a peri-operative infection and late acetabular fracture had a loose, non-revised cementless cup. 1 case of sciatic nerve palsy occurred after revision using a reconstruction ring. 1 late infection necessitated resection arthroplasty. Harris hip scores improved from 53 (34–85) to 76 (47–96).

Interpretation Revision THA in JCA has a substantial complication rate, even in experienced hands. The problem of obtaining long-term stable fixation, osteolysis, and replenishment of lost bone stock are major difficulties.     

Survivorship of rough-surfaced threaded acetabular cups 382: Consecutive primary Zweymiiller cups followed for 0.2-12 years

We studied prospectively 382 cementless (Zweymiiller stem) and hybrid (cemented stem) primary total hip replacements and used a cementless grit-blasted titanium alloy threaded cup. After a median 5 (0.2-12)-year follow-up, 1 cup was exchanged, 2 cups were removed for deep sepsis, and 3 cups showed definite loosening; of these, 2 subsequently required revision. Actuarial calculation methods indicated a 10-year survivorship of 99% with cup retrieval for any cause (clinical failure), definite cup-loosening (radiographic failure), and revision for aseptic cup-loosening as endpoints. These intermediate results exceed those from smooth-surfaced screw rings and compare favorably with those from cemented cups and cementless, press-fit, metal-backed cups.     

Reverse hybrid and cemented hip replacement compared using radiostereometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

Background and purpose Total hip replacement (THR) with a reverse hybrid (RH), a combination of a cemented polyethylene cup and a cementless femoral stem, has been increasingly used in Scandinavia. In a randomized trial, we compared an RH THR with a proximal hydroxyapatite- (HA-) coated stem to a conventional cemented THR. Both groups received the same polyethylene cup.

Patients and methods 51 patients (52 hips) were included. Radiostereometry (RSA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) were performed postoperatively and after 6, 12, and 24 months. 42 patients (43 hips) were followed for 2 years.

Results Mean cup rotation around the x-axis was 0.13° for the cemented group and –0.24° for the RH group (p = 0.03). Cup migration in the other axes, and stem migration and wear were similar between the 2 study groups. Bone remodeling around the cup was also similar between the groups. Bone loss in Gruen zone 1 was 18% for the cementless stems, as compared to an increase of 1.4% for the cemented ones (p < 0.001). Bone loss was similar in the other Gruen zones. Harris hip score and Oxford hip score were similar pre- and postoperatively in the 2 groups.

Interpretation In the present study, RH THR with a cementless hydroxyapatite-coated stem and conventional cemented THR did not show any major differences regarding stem migration and bone loss after 2 years of follow-up.     

Short-term survival of the trabecular metal cup is similar to that of standard cups used in acetabular revision surgery: Analysis of 2,460 first-time cup revisions in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register

Background and purpose — The use of trabecular metal (TM) cups in revision surgery has increased worldwide during the last decade. Since the introduction of the TM cup in Sweden in 2006, this design has gradually replaced other uncemented designs used in Sweden. According to data from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (SHAR) in 2012, one-third of all uncemented first-time cup revisions were performed using a TM cup. We compared the risk of reoperation and re-revision for TM cups and the 2 other most frequently used cup designs in acetabular revisions reported to the SHAR. The hypothesis was that the performance of TM cups is as good as that of established designs in the short term.

Patients and methods — The study population consisted of 2,384 patients who underwent 2,460 revisions during the period 2006 through 2012. The most commonly used cup designs were the press-fit porous-coated cup (n = 870), the trabecular metal cup (n = 805), and the cemented all-polyethylene cup (n = 785). 54% of the patients were female, and the median age at index revision was 72 (19–95) years. Reoperation was defined as a second surgical intervention, and re-revision—meaning exchange or removal of the cup—was used as endpoint. The mean follow-up time was 3.3 (0–7) years.

Results — There were 215 reoperations, 132 of which were re-revisions. The unadjusted and adjusted risk of reoperation or re-revision was not significantly different for the TM cup and the other 2 cup designs.

Interpretation — Our data support continued use of TM cups in acetabular revisions. Further follow-up is necessary to determine whether trabecular metal cups can reduce the re-revision rate in the long term, compared to the less costly porous press-fit and cemented designs.     

Cementless primary total hip arthroplasty with a tapered, proximally porous-coated titanium prosthesis: a 4- to 8-year retrospective review

A consecutive series of 100 primary total hip arthroplasties were performed at a single institution on 87 patients using a cementless collared titanium press-fit stem. Of patients, 87% received a hemispheric porous-coated cup, and 13% received a nonmodular titanium fibermesh press-fit cup. Ten hips were excluded from the longer-term evaluation: 6 were lost to follow-up, and 4 patients were deceased. Ninety hips, with an average follow-up of 81 +/- 12 months, were retrospectively reviewed. The average postoperative hip score was 94, compared with an average preoperative hip score of 42. No postoperative infections were observed, but there were 2 cases of postoperative dislocation (2%) and 1 case of thigh pain (1%) at last follow-up. There were 2 revisions, both for cup failures. There were no femoral component loosenings or revisions. There was no evidence of stem subsidence or instability. These midterm results are encouraging with this stem design.     

Distal stem design and the torsional stability of cementless femoral stems

In cementless hip arthroplasty, the fit between the implant and the endosteal cavity is a critical determinant of implant stability. Although cementless implants may be stabilized through proximal fit within the metaphysis, many surgeons rely on diaphyseal fixation to provide the necessary resistance to rotational forces, especially in revision hip arthroplasty. The cross-sectional design of the femoral stem at the level of the femoral isthmus was investigated with respect to its effect on the rotational stability of the bone-stem interface. Four cross-sectional designs—a fluted stem, a finned stem, a porous-coated stem, and a slotted fluted stem—were implanted in 12 cadaveric femurs and loaded in torsion. A knurled stem, cemented into each specimen at the conclusion of testing, acted as a control stem. The torque required to cause 100 μm of displacement at the bone stem—interface ranged from 13.7 ± 0.8 N-m with the porous-coated design to 30.1 ± 3.7 N-m with the fluted design (P < .0001). Intermediate values of 19.5 ± 1.4 and 19.9 ± 2.3 N-m were observed with the finned and slotted fluted designs, respectively. In all of the cemented control stems, failure occurred at the bone-cement interface at an average torque of 34.0 ± 3.0 N-m. Statistical analysis demonstrated that the porous-coated, finned, and slotted fluted designs were all significantly weaker in torsion than the cemented control stem; however, there was no significant difference between the torsional resistance of the solid fluted (unslotted) and cemented stems. With the exception of the fluted stem design, it is postulated that the cementless stem configurations evaluated would provide insufficient resistance to torsional forces to stabilize a femoral prosthesis solely through distal fixation within the medullary canal. Consequently, rotational stabilization of the cementless prosthesis necessitates proximal and distal contact between the implant and the femur.     

Have cementless and resurfacing components improved the medium-term results of hip replacement for patients under 60 years of age?

Background and purpose — The optimal hip replacement for young patients remains unknown. We compared patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), revision risk, and implant costs over a range of hip replacements.

Methods — We included hip replacements for osteoarthritis in patients under 60 years of age performed between 2003 and 2010 using the commonest brand of cemented, cementless, hybrid, or resurfacing prosthesis (11,622 women and 13,087 men). The reference implant comprised a cemented stem with a conventional polyethylene cemented cup and a standard-sized head (28- or 32-mm). Differences in implant survival were assessed using competing-risks models, adjusted for known prognostic influences. Analysis of covariance was used to assess improvement in PROMs (Oxford hip score (OHS) and EQ5D index) in 2014 linked procedures.

Results — In males, PROMs and implant survival were similar across all types of implants. In females, revision was statistically significantly higher in hard-bearing and/or small-stem cementless implants (hazard ratio (HR) = 4) and resurfacings (small head sizes (< 48 mm): HR = 6; large head sizes (≥ 48 mm): HR = 5) when compared to the reference cemented implant. In component combinations with equivalent survival, women reported significantly greater improvements in OHS with hybrid implants (22, p = 0.006) and cementless implants (21, p = 0.03) (reference, 18), but similar EQ5D index. For men and women, National Health Service (NHS) costs were lowest with the reference implant and highest with a hard-bearing cementless replacement.

Interpretation — In young women, hybrids offer a balance of good early functional improvement and low revision risk. Fully cementless and resurfacing components are more costly and do not provide any additional benefit for younger patients.     

Micromotion Analysis of Various Tibial Constructs in Moderate Tibial Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe purpose of this study is to compare the micromotion of various tibial reconstruction strategies including short cemented and long cementless stems with or without metaphyseal augmentation.MethodsA moderate tibial bone defect was milled into dual density polyurethane test blocks. Mechanical testing was performed on 4 test constructs: (1) short cemented stem (75-mm total length) alone; (2) short cemented stem with a symmetric metaphyseal cone; (3) a press-fit (175-mm total length) diaphyseal engaging tibial construct without a cone, and (4) the same press-fit tibial construct with a metaphyseal cone augment. Micromotion of the baseplate/cone construct with respect to the tibia block was measured during a stair descent loading profile for 10,000 cycles. The peak-to-peak micromotion of these various tibial constructs was compared. Unpaired t-tests were used to evaluate differences in peak-to-peak micromotion among the various tibial constructs tested. An analysis of variance was performed for final validation.ResultsThe cemented short stem demonstrated similar varus/valgus displacement, internal/external rotation, compression, and lift-off micromotion values under loading compared to a cementless long stem. A tibial cone improved compression and lift-off micromotion for both cemented and cementless constructs. A short 50-mm cemented stem with a cone demonstrated a lower micromotion at the anterior SI location compared to a press-fit 150-mm cementless stem without a tibial cone.ConclusionsA short cemented tibial component with a cone achieved similar micromotion during simulated stair descent compared to a cementless diaphyseal press-fit implant in cases of moderate tibial defects