Diagnostic value of computed tomography‐based pulmonary artery to aorta ratio measurement in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with pulmonary hypertension: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

ObjectiveWe conducted a meta‐analysis to systematic assess the diagnostic value of computed tomography (CT)‐based pulmonary artery to aorta (PA:A) ratio measurement in COPD with pulmonary hypertension (COPD‐PH).MethodsPublished studies referring to diagnostic accuracy of PA:A ratio for COPD‐PH were screened out from PubMed, Embase, Web of science, China National Knowledge databases (CNKI), Wan fang databases, and VIP databases. We used bivariate random‐effects model to estimate pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive and negative likelihood ratios (PLR and NLR, respectively), and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR). Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) were also calculated to summarize the aggregate diagnostic performance.ResultsNine eligible studies were included and the pooled SEN was 69% (95% CI: 59 ~ 78), SPE was 85% (95% CI: 77 ~ 90), PLR was 4.5 (95% CI: 2.8 ~ 7.5), and NLR was 0.36 (95% CI: 0.26 ~ 0.51), respectively. DOR reached 13.00 (95% CI: 6.00 ~ 28.00), and value of AUC was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81 ~ 0.87). Subgroup analysis indicated that when the value of PA:A ratio was equal or greater than one (PA/A ≥ 1), the combined SEN, SPE, AUC, and DOR was 69%, 89%, 0.90, and 19.65, respectively.ConclusionsPA:A ratio is helpful for appraisal of COPD‐PH, and PA/A ≥ 1 possessed prominent diagnostic accuracy.     

Diagnostic accuracy of transient elastography (Fibro Scan) in detection of esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis: A meta-analysis

AIM To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of Fibro Scan(FS) in detecting esophageal varices(EV) in cirrhotic patients.METHODS Through a systemic literature search of multiple databases, we reviewed 15 studies using endoscopy as a reference standard, with the data necessary to calculate pooled sensitivity(SEN) and specificity(SPE), positive and negative LR, diagnostic odds ratio(DOR) and area under receiver operating characteristics(AUROC). The quality of the studies was rated by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy studies-2 tool. Clinical utility of FS for EV was evaluated by a Fagan plot. Heterogeneity was explored using meta-regression and subgroup analysis. All statistical analyses were conducted via Stata12.0, MetaD isc1.4 and RevM an5.RESULTS In 15 studies(n = 2697), FS detected the presence of EV with the summary sensitivities of 84%(95%CI: 81.0%-86.0%), specificities of 62%(95%CI: 58.0%-66.0%), a positive LR of 2.3(95%CI: 1.81-2.94), a negative LR of 0.26(95%CI: 0.19-0.35), a DOR of 9.33(95%CI: 5.84-14.92) and an AUROC of 0.8262. FS diagnosed the presence of large EV with the pooled SEN of 0.78(95%CI: 75.0%-81.0%), SPE of 0.76(95%CI: 73.0%-78.0%), a positive and negative LR of 3.03(95%CI: 2.38-3.86) and 0.30(95%CI: 0.23-0.39) respectively, a summary diagnostic OR of 10.69(95%CI: 6.81-16.78), and an AUROC of 0.8321. A meta-regression and subgroup analysis indicated different etiology could serve as a potential source of heterogeneity in the diagnosis of the presence of EV group. A Deek's funnel plot suggested a low probability for publication bias.CONCLUSION Using FS to measure liver stiffness cannot provide high accuracy for the size of EV due to the various cutoff and different etiologies. These limitations preclude widespread use in clinical practice at this time; therefore, the results should be interpreted cautiously given its SEN and SPE.     

Diagnostic accuracy of dual‐source computed tomography angiography for the detection of coronary in‐stent restenosis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

We sought to perform a meta‐analysis to comprehensively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dual‐source computed tomography angiography (DSCTA) in detecting coronary in‐stent restenosis (CISR) when compared to invasive coronary angiography. The stent‐based research studies in which DSCTA was used as diagnostic tool for CISR, as recent as of October 2017, from several reputed scientific libraries (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were evaluated. Study inclusion, data extraction, and risk bias assessment were conducted by two researchers independently. Pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under summary receiver operator characteristics (SROC) curve (AUC) were calculated to assess the diagnostic value. In addition, heterogeneity and subgroup analysis were also carried out. A total of 13 studies with a total of 894 patients and 1384 assessable stents were included. The pooled results of DSCTA diagnosing CISR were as follows: SEN 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87–0.96), SPE 0.91 (95% CI 0.87–0.94), PLR 9.83 (95% CI 6.93–13.94), NLR 0.09 (95% CI 0.05–0.15), DOR 114.73 (95% CI 64.12–205.28), and AUC 0.97 (95% CI 0.95–0.98), respectively. The subgroup analysis result suggested that DSTCA performed significantly better in CISR detection when the stent diameter was ≥3 mm compared with the stent diameter <3 mm: (0.98 [0.97–0.99] vs 0.82 [0.79–0.86]) with P < .05. This study revealed that DSCTA has excellent diagnostic performance for detecting CISR and may serve as an alternative for further patient evaluation with CISR, especially for stent diameter ≥3 mm.     

The meta-analysis of the effect of 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT diagnosis of prostatic cancer compared with bone scan

Background:⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-PET/CT (positron emission tomography/computed tomography) is a promising method for prostate cancer (PC) detection. However, the ability of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-PET/CT to detect malignant bone lesions, and whether this method is superior to the existing bone imaging methods are still lack of systematic analysis.Purpose:To evaluate the value of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-PET/CT and bone scan in clinical diagnosis of prostatic cancer from the perspective of evidence-based medicine.Methods:PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Springer Link, Sinomed, CNKI, Wanfang database, and CQVIP database were searched to find the satisfactory studies that needed systematic review of trials and compared the value of 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT and bone scan. All studies published from inception to March 31, 2020. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 2 reviewers independently evaluated and extracted the literature. Review Manager 5.3 was applied to evaluate the included literature quality. The heterogeneity of the included literature was tested by Meta Disc 1.4, and the effect model was selected according to the heterogeneity test results, and the sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), PLR, NLR and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were analyzed. After testing the heterogeneity results of literature by using the 95% confidence interval and the forest map.Results:A total of 4 studies were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis, which included 318 patients, 120 cases with bone metastasis and 198 cases without bone metastasis. The results of summary evaluation for ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-PET/CT and bone scan in diagnosis of prostatic cancer as follow respectively: The SEN were 0.97 and 0.86; the SPE were 1.00 and 0.87; the DOR were 1468.33 and 36.23; PLR were 88.45 and 6.67; NLR were 0.05 and 0.19; and the area under curve (AUC) and 95% CI were 0.9973 (1.0000–0.9927) and 0.8838 (0.9584–0.8092).Conclusion:By comparing the diagnostic results of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-PET/CT and bone scan imaging diagnosis methods, the ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-PET/CT has a higher SEN and SPE than bone scan, and it has a higher diagnostic efficiency for prostate cancer bone metastasis, which is worthy of clinical application.     

Diagnostic value of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody for rheumatoid arthritis in a Chinese population: a meta-analysis

To use meta-analysis to determine the accuracy of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody in diagnosis of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a Chinese population, we searched MEDLINE and CNKI databases for studies published in English or Chinese between January 2000 and June 2010. Two investigators independently evaluated studies for inclusion, data extraction, and quality assessment. We used a random-effects model to combine estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). One hundred and eighteen studies met our inclusion criteria. All studies were of high quality. The summary estimates for anti-CCP antibody in the diagnosis of RA in a Chinese population were as follows: sensitivity 0.65 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.66), specificity 0.95 (95% CI 0.95-0.96), positive likelihood ratio (LR+) 15.84 (95% CI 13.55-18.54), negative likelihood ratio (LR-) 0.33 (95% CI 0.31-0.35), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) 51.60 (95% CI 43.64-61.01). With high specificity and moderate sensitivity, anti-CCP antibody tests play an important role in conforming the diagnosis of RA in a Chinese population.     

Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis

Background and objectiveEUS-FNA of pancreatic lesion has been put into clinical use widely in many centers. The present meta-analysis was conducted to study the diagnostic role of EUS-FNA in pancreatic cancer.MethodsA comprehensive review of study on the precision of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. A random effects model was used to pool the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). A summary receiver-operating characteristic (SROC) was constructed to summarize the overall test performance.ResultsThirty-one articles were eligible for the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and DOR of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.88–0.90), 0.96 (95% CI: 0.95–0.97), 16.88 (95% CI: 10.63–26.79), 0.13 (95%CI: 0.10–0.16) and 150.80 (95%CI: 95.94–237.03) respectively. In subgroup meta-analysis of the prospective studies, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and DOR were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.90–0.93), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91–0.96), 11.19 (95% CI: 6.36–19.69), 0.10 (95% CI: 0.07–0.15) and 125.22 (62.37–251.41). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.97, indicating a good performance of overall accuracy.ConclusionEUS-FNA has the high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating pancreatic cancer. Moreover, it is also a safe diagnostic modality with little complications.     

Accuracy of objective tests for diagnosing adult asthma in symptomatic patients: A systematic literature review and hierarchical Bayesian latent-class meta-analysis

BackgroundWe obtain summary estimates of the accuracy of additional objective tests for the diagnosis of adult asthma using systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.MethodsMedline, Embase, and other relevant electronic databases were searched for papers published between January 1989 and December 2016. Studies were included if they evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of objective tests, including airway reversibility (AR), airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), and fractionated exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) for the diagnosis of adult asthma in patients with symptoms suggestive of asthma. If papers were assessed appropriate using the adapted QUADAS-2 tool, meta-analysis was conducted using the hierarchical bivariate model. This hierarchical model accounts for both within and between study variability.ResultsSixteen studies reported the performance of the evaluated objective tests at presentation. For diagnosis of adult asthma, overall sensitivity and specificity for AR were 0.39 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18 to 0.66) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.00); for AHR, 0.86 (95% CI 0.61 to 1.00) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.00); for FeNO, 0.65 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.77) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.90). Comprehensive comparison of three diagnostic tools for adult asthma using the back-calculated likelihood rate (LR) showed that AR and AHR corresponded to a higher LR+, and AHR gave a lower LR-.ConclusionsIn the current situation of no gold standard for diagnosis of adult asthma, AR and AHR are appropriate for ruling-in the true diagnosis, and AHR is superior for ruling-out a diagnosis. Since each objective test had a specific characteristic, it should be chosen depending on the situation, such as the capacity of the institution and the conditions of patients.     

18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to evaluate recurrent gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and Aim: We aimed to explore the role of the diagnostic accuracy of ¹⁸F‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F‐FDG PET) in detecting recurrent gastric cancer through a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Methods: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cancerlit, and Cochrane Library database, from January 2001 to July 2011, were searched for studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F‐FDG PET in detecting recurrent gastric cancer. We determined the sensitivities and specificities across studies, calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR?), and constructed summary receiver operating characteristic curves. We also compared the performance of ¹⁸F‐FDG PET with computed tomography (CT) by analyzing studies that had also used these diagnostic methods on the same patients. Results: Across nine studies (526 patients), the overall sensitivity of ¹⁸F‐FDG PET was 0.78 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68–0.86), and the overall specificity was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.76–0.87). Overall, LR+ was 3.52 (95% CI: 2.68–4.63) and LR? was 0.32 (95% CI: 0.22–0.46). In studies in which both ¹⁸F‐FDG PET and other diagnostic tests were performed, the sensitivity and specificity of ¹⁸F‐FDG PET were 0.72 (95% CI: 0.62–0.80) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77–0.90), respectively; of contrast CT, they were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.64–0.83) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.78–0.90), respectively; and of combined PET and CT, they were 0.75 (95% CI: 0.67–0.82) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.79–0.90), respectively. Study sensitivity was not correlated with the prevalence of recurrent gastric cancer. Conclusion: ¹⁸F‐FDG PET has good diagnostic performance in the overall evaluation of recurrent gastric cancer, but still has some limited performance compared with contrast CT. ¹⁸F‐FDG PET combined with CT might improve the diagnostic performance in detecting recurrent gastric cancer.     

Carotid plaque,compared with carotid intima-media thickness,more accurately predicts coronary artery disease events: A meta-analysis

ObjectivesWe conducted the meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic accuracies of carotid plaque and carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) measured by B-mode ultrasonography for the prediction of coronary artery disease (CAD) events.MethodsTwo reviewers independently searched electronic databases to identify relevant studies through April 2011. Both population-based longitudinal studies with the outcome measure of myocardial infarction (MI) events and diagnostic cohort studies for the detection of CAD were identified and analyzed separately. Weighted summary receiver-operating characteristic (SROC) plots, with pertinent areas under the curves (AUCs), were constructed using the Moses–Shapiro–Littenberg model. Meta-regression analyses, using parameters of relative diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), were conducted to compare the diagnostic performance after adjusting other study-specific covariates.ResultsThe meta-analysis of 11 population-based studies (54,336 patients) showed that carotid plaque, compared with CIMT, had a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy for the prediction of future MI events (AUC 0.64 vs. 0.61, relative DOR 1.35; 95%CI 1.1–1.82, p = 0.04). The 10-year event rates of MI after negative results were lower with carotid plaque (4.0%; 95% CI 3.6–4.7%) than with CIMT (4.7%; 95% CI 4.2–5.5%). The meta-analysis of 27 diagnostic cohort studies (4.878 patients) also showed a higher, but non-significant, diagnostic accuracy of carotid plaque compared with CIMT for the detection of CAD (AUC 0.76 vs. 0.74, p = 0.21 for relative DOR).ConclusionsThe present meta-analysis showed that the ultrasound assessment of carotid plaque, compared with that of CIMT, had a higher diagnostic accuracy for the prediction of future CAD events.     

Diagnostic accuracy of fractional exhaled nitric oxide in asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

Background: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) has been proposed as a non-invasive measure of airway inflammation in asthma. However, its accuracy for the diagnosis of asthma in different populations is not completely clear. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of FeNO measurement for the diagnosis of asthma through a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Methods: A systematic search current to July 2014 was performed in Pubmed, EMBASE, Medline, the Cochrane databases, CNKI, Wanfang and Weipu to find relevant studies. All prospective studies on the use of FeNO for the diagnosis of asthma were included. Results: Twenty-five studies including 3983 subjects were analyzed. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for the entire population was 72% (95% CI, 70–74%), 78% (95% CI, 76–80%) and 15.92 (95% CI, 10.70–23.68), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves revealed a receiver-operating characteristic of 0.88. In subgroup analysis, the DOR for patients using corticosteroids, as well as those for steroid-naïve, non-smoking, smoking, chronic cough and allergic rhinitis patients were 4.47 (95% CI, 3.39–5.90), 21.40 (95% CI, 15.38–29.76), 19.84 (95% CI, 15.63–25.19), 5.41 (95% CI, 2.97–9.86), 35.36 (95% CI, 23.90–52.29), and 2.99 (95% CI, 0.85–10.45), respectively. Conclusion: FeNO is accurate for the diagnosis of asthma in steroid-naive or non-smoking patients, particularly in chronic cough patients.     

Diagnostic accuracy of EUS and CT of vascular invasion in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review

Objective

The objective of this study was to summarize the accuracy of preoperative vascular invasion with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and computed tomography (CT) test performance in pancreatic cancer with meta-analysis

Method

Two reviewers searched MEDLINE database to identify relevant studies. The reference lists of the trials were manually searched. Included studies used surgical and/or histological findings as the “gold standard,” and provided sufficient data to construct a diagnostic 2 × 2 table. A statistical program of Meta-Disc was used to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive LR, negative LR, DOR, and the SROC curve. Publication bias was assessed by Deeks’ asymmetry test. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were calculated to down the heterogeneity. Meta-regression was calculated to evaluate potential sources of heterogeneity

Result

A total of 30 studies with 1,554 patients were included for the analysis, nine of these studies compared EUS with CT to assess the diagnostic efficiency The pooled sensitivity of EUS and CT was 72 % (95 % CI 67–77 %) and 63 % (95 % CI 58–67 %), and the pooled specificity of EUS and CT was 89 % (95 % CI 86–92 %) and 92 % (95 % CI 90–94 %), respectively. The positive LR of EUS and CT was 5.14 (95 % CI 3.14–8.40) and 6.21 (95 % CI 3.96–9.71), and the negative LR was 0.36 (95 % CI 0.25–0.52) and 0.41 (95 % CI 0.31–0.55), respectively. The AUCs of EUS and CT were 0.9037 and 0.8948. The subgroup analysis of nine studies performed both EUS and CT showed CT scan with a lower sensitivity of 48 % (95 % CI 0.40–0.56), when compared to EUS of 69 % (95 % CI 0.61–0.77). The overall AUCs of CT scan appear to be lower (AUCs = 0.8589), compared with EUS (AUCs = 0.9379)

Conclusion

EUS performed better than CT in differentiating vascular invasion preoperative on pancreatic cancer. EUS could provide other additional information when compared with CT.     

Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging compared with fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for pancreatic malignancy: a meta-analysis using a hierarchical regression model

Background and Aim: To obtain diagnostic performance of diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) and fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the detection of pancreatic malignancy. Methods: We performed a meta‐analysis of all available studies of the diagnostic performance of DWI and PET/CT for pancreatic malignancy. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library and some other databases were searched for initial studies. We determined sensitivities and specificities across studies, calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR?), and constructed summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC) using hierarchical regression models. Results: Across 16 studies with 804 patients, PET/CT sensitivity was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82, 0.81) and specificity was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.71, 0.91). Overall, LR+ was 5.84 (95% CI, 4.59, 7.42) and LR? was 0.24 (95% CI, 0.17, 0.33). DWI sensitivity was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.74, 0.92) and specificity was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.71, 0.98). LR+ was 9.53 (95% CI, 2.41, 37.65) and LR? was 0.17 (95% CI, 0.09, 0.32). In subgroup analysis, the sensitivity of enhanced versus unenhanced PET/CT in the detection of pancreatic cancer was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.86, 0.96) versus 0.84 (95% CI, 0.78, 0.90) (P > 0.05), the specificity 0.88 (95% CI, 0.73, 1.00) versus 0.81 (95% CI, 0.69, 0.94) (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) was highly sensitive and DWI was a highly specific modality in diagnosing patients with pancreatic malignancy. PET/CT and DWI could play different roles in diagnosing pancreatic carcinoma. Enhanced PET/CT seems to be superior to unenhanced PET/CT. Further larger prospective studies are needed to establish its value for diagnosis in pancreatic cancer.     

Exploring diagnostic and prognostic predictive values of microRNAs for acute myocardial infarction: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective:Previous investigations yielded inconsistent results for diagnostic and prognostic predictive values of MicroRNAs (miRNAs) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Methods and results:We systematically searched on PubMed and Web of Science for articles explored association of miRNAs and AMI published from January 1989 to March 2019. For diagnostic studies, a summary of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios (PLR), negative likelihood ratios (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), which indicated the accuracy of microRNAs in the differentiation of AMI and no AMI, were calculated from the true positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP), and false negative (FN) of each study. In addition, the summary receive-operating characteristics (SROC) curve was constructed to summarize the TP and FP rates. For follow-up study, we computed hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for individual clinical outcomes. The meta-analysis showed a sensitivity [0.72 (95% CI: 0.61--0.81)] and specificity [0.88 (95% CI: 0.79--0.94)] of miR-1 for AMI. In addition, miR-133 showed a sensitivity [0.73 (95% CI: 0.55--0.85)] and specificity [0.88 (95% CI: 0.74--0.95)] for AMI. Moreover, the present study showed a sensitivity [0.83 (95% CI: 0.74--0.89)] and specificity [0.96 (95% CI: 0.82--0.99)] of miR-208 for AMI. A significant association was found between miR-208 and mortality after AMI (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01--1.18). It also indicated a sensitivity [0.84 (95% CI: 0.70--0.92)] and specificity [0.97 (95% CI: 0.87--0.99)] of miR-499 for AMI.Conclusions:Circulating miR-1, miR-133, miR-208, and miR-499 showed diagnostic values in AMI.     

CT-Base Pulmonary Artery Measurementin the Detection of Pulmonary Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

To summarize the performance of CT-based main pulmonary artery diameter or pulmonary artery to aorta ratio (PA:A ratio) measurement in detection of pulmonary hypertension by a systematic review and meta-analysis.A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify studies determining diagnostic accuracy of main pulmonary artery diameter or PA:A ratio measurement for pulmonary hypertension. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. A bivariate random-effects model was used to pool sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative likelihood ratio (PLR/NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) were used to summarize overall diagnostic performance.This meta-analysis included 20 publications involving 2134 subjects. Summary estimates for main pulmonary artery diameter measurement in the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension were as follows: sensitivity, 0.79 (95% CI 0.72–0.84); specificity, 0.83 (95% CI 0.75–0.89); PLR, 4.68 (95% CI 3.13–6.99); NLR, 0.26 (95% CI 0.20–0.33); DOR, 18.13 (95% CI 10.87–30.24); and AUC 0.87. The corresponding summary performance estimates for using the PA:A ratio were as follows: sensitivity, 0.74 (95% CI 0.66–0.80); specificity, 0.81 (95% CI 0.74–0.86); PLR, 3.83 (95% CI, 2.70–5.43); NLR, 0.33 (95% CI 0.24–0.44); DOR, 11.77 (95% CI 6.60–21.00); and AUC 0.84.Both main pulmonary artery diameter and PA:A ratio are helpful for diagnosing pulmonary hypertension. Nevertheless, the results of pulmonary artery measurement should be interpreted in parallel with the results of traditional tests such as echocardiography.     

The high-risk bleeding category of different scores in patients with venous thromboembolism: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundIn patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), bleeding risk should be carefully assessed but none of the available risk scores is currently recommended. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the performance of bleeding scores in patients with VTE focusing on high-risk patients.MethodsLongitudinal studies were searched in Medline and Cochrane Library, as well as reviews and references of retrieved articles. Studies were identified, data were extracted, and reporting quality was evaluated. We determined the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of the ‘high risk’ category of each bleeding score. Random effects meta-analysis was performed in order to derive the central estimates and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).ResultsTwenty-one studies and ten bleeding scores fulfilled the inclusion criteria. VTE-BLEED showed the highest sensitivity but the second-lowest specificity (Se 76%; Sp 61%), followed by ACCP (Se 59%; Sp 57%). The remaining scores had high specificity (> 80%) but a low sensitivity (< 20%). HEMORR₂HAGES and Niewenhuis score showed the best performance regarding LR+ that was 2.67 and 5.91, respectively. Regarding DOR, the Niewenhuis score and VTE-BLEED were the best performers with 9.04; 95% CI 3.87–21.09 and 4.94 95% CI 2.66–9.09, respectively. In a cohort with patients predominantly treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), VTE-BLEED had the highest sensitivity (Se 77%; Sp 60%).ConclusionsOverall, the majority of the risk scores showed a moderate ability to forecast major bleeding events, with the VTE-BLEED as the most sensitive in patients treated with DOACs.     

小探头超声内镜诊断早期胃癌浸润深度准确性的Meta分析

目的对小探头超声内镜诊断早期胃癌浸润深度的准确性进行定量系统评价。 方法检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase、CNKI、万方、维普数据库检索相关文献。对纳入的文献用Stata 14.2软件进行meta分析,得出汇总敏感度、特异度、阳性似然比、阴性似然比、诊断优势比及其95% CI,绘制总受试者工作特征曲线(SROC),并计算曲线下面积(AUC)等,评估其诊断价值。 结果共纳入文献16篇,包括3 168例病灶,汇总敏感度、特异度、阳性似然比、阴性似然比、诊断优势比及其95% CI分别是0.85(95% CI：0.78～0.90),0.73(95% CI：0.65～0.80),3.2(95% CI：2.4～4.1),0.20(95% CI：0.14～0.30),16(95% CI：9～26),SROC曲线下面积为0.85。 结论小探头超声内镜虽不能准确诊断早期胃癌M/SM1层浸润,但仍能很大程度提高对早期胃癌浸润深度的正确判断。     

Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: It is difficult to diagnose the cause of abdominal lymphadenopathy without determining the primary lesions. With the advent of curved ultrasound endoscopy, EUS-FNA can sample lymph nodes safely, accurately and conveniently. Due to the lack of formal quantitative and comprehensive literature review to determine the diagnostic value of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of enlarged intra-abdominal lymph nodes of unknown origin, we conducted this study to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA in the enlarged intra-abdominal lymph nodes.

Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library to collect related studies and diagnostic performance data. We used a random-effects model to estimate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Heterogeneity was assessed by subgroup and meta-regression analysis.

Results: Twelve eligible studies involved 774 patients were identified. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of all studies is 94% (95% CI: 91% to 96%) and 98% (95% CI: 96% to 99%), respectively. The pooled positive and negative likelihood ratios are 17.44 (95% CI, 6.50 to 46.79) and 0.09 (95% CI: 0.06 to 0.14). The pooled DOR is 277.82 (95% CI, 97.65 to 790.46).

Conclusions: EUS-FNA is a safe and feasible technique with high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of abdominal lymph node enlargement. Considering the limitations and heterogeneity, high-quality studies are needed to further explore the diagnostic value of EUS-FNA.     

Clinical role of miR-421 as a novel biomarker in diagnosis of gastric cancer patients: A meta-analysis

Background:Gastric cancer (GC) has been identified as one of the most common malignancies. It was found that microRNAs can be used as potential biomarkers for GC diagnosis. The aim of this study was to estimate the diagnostic value of 4 potential microRNAs in GC.Methods:PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were used to search published studies. The quality of the studies was scored with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. The pooled sensitivity and specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. The heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochrane Q statistics and the inconsistency index.Results:A total of 22 studies reporting the diagnostic value of miR-21 (n = 9), miR-106 (n = 10), miR-421 (n = 5) and miR-223 (n = 3) were included. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies scores showed the high quality of the selected 22 articles. The random effects model was adopted by evaluating the heterogeneity between articles. The DOR, AUC, and Q value of miRNA-21 were 12.37 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.36–28.54), 0.86 and 0.79, respectively. The DOR, AUC and Q value of miRNA-106 were 12.98 [95% CI: 7.14–23.61], 0.85 and 0.78, respectively. The DOR, AUC and Q value of miRNA-421 were 27.86 [95% CI: 6.04–128.48], 0.92 and 0.86, respectively. The DOR, AUC and Q value of miRNA-223 were 18.50 [95% CI: 7.80–43.86], 0.87 and 0.80, respectively. These results indicate that miRNA-421 has the highest diagnostic accuracy, followed by miR-223, miRNA-21, and miRNA-106 among the 4 microRNAs in GC.Conclusions:miR-21, miR-106, miR-421, and miR-223 have good diagnostic efficacy, especially miR-421, could be used as auxiliary diagnostic indicator for GC.     

Accuracy of ultrasonography, spiral CT, magnetic resonance, and alpha-fetoprotein in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In patients with chronic liver disease, the accuracy of ultrasound scan (US), spiral computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has never been systematically assessed, and present systematic review was aimed at this issue. METHODS: Pertinent cross-sectional studies having as a reference standard pathological examinations of the explanted liver or resected segment(s), biopsies of focal lesion(s), and/or a period of follow-up, were identified using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CancerLit. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios (LR) were calculated using the random effect model. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and predefined subgroup analyses were made when indicated. RESULTS: The pooled estimates of the 14 US studies were 60% (95% CI 44-76) for sensitivity, 97% (95% CI 95-98) for specificity, 18 (95% CI 8-37) for LR+, and 0.5 (95% CI 0.4-0.6) for LR-; for the 10 CT studies sensitivity was 68% (95% CI 55-80), specificity 93% (95% CI 89-96), LR+ 6 (95% CI 3-12),and LR- 0.4 (95% CI 0.3-0.6); for the nine MRI studies sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 70-91), specificity 85% (95%CI 77-93), LR+ 3.9 (95%CI 2-7), and LR- 0.3 (95% CI 0.2-0.5). The sensitivity and specificity of AFP varied widely, and this could not be entirely attributed to the threshold effect of the different cutoff levels used. CONCLUSIONS: US is highly specific but insufficiently sensitive to detect HCC in many cirrhotics or to support an effective surveillance program. The operative characteristics of CT are comparable, whereas MRI is more sensitive. High-quality prospective studies are needed to define the actual diagnostic role of AFP.     

Endoscopic ultrasound elastography in the diagnosis of pancreatic masses: A meta-analysis

Background and aims

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) elastography is a novel non-invasive technique that can be used for distinguishing benign from malignant pancreatic masses. However, the studies have reported widely varied sensitivities and specificities. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the performance of EUS elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant pancreatic masses.