共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 671 毫秒
1.
Su-jin Rhee Howard Lee Li Young Ahn Kyoung Soo Lim Kyung-Sang Yu 《Clinical therapeutics》2018,40(10):1720-1728.e2
Purpose
Pregabalin and thioctic acid are likely to be used concomitantly for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy. In this study, the pharmacokinetic interaction between pregabalin and thioctic acid was investigated at steady state.Methods
A randomized, open-label, 6-sequence, 3-period, 3-treatment crossover study was conducted in 42 healthy male volunteers. The volunteers randomly received pregabalin 300 mg BID for 6 times, thioctic acid 600 mg once daily for 3 times, or the combination of pregabalin and thioctic acid. Serial blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after the last dosing in each period. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by using noncompartmental analysis methods.Findings
The mean concentration–time curves were similar between each drug alone and in combination with the other drug. The 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios with and without the co-administered drug for Cmax at steady state and AUC during the dosing interval were well within the conventional bioequivalence range of 0.8 to 1.25, except for Cmax at steady state for thioctic acid, which barely exceeded only the lower bound (0.78–1.15). Co-administered pregabalin and thioctic acid was well tolerated.Implications
Repeatedly administered pregabalin and thioctic acid do not interact pharmacokinetically. This study suggests that the combination of pregabalin and thioctic acid can safely be administered concomitantly without dose adjustment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01808300. 相似文献2.
Cheng-zi Zuo Yi Gong Xiang-yu Hou Yi-fan Zhang Wen-xing Peng Rong-hua Zhu Da-fang Zhong Xiao-yan Chen 《Clinical therapeutics》2018,40(8):1347-1356
Purpose
Imrecoxib is one type of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor with the capability of reducing the potential cardiovascular risk caused by other NSAIDs. Co-administration with other medications can affect the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 enzyme function; thus, imrecoxib metabolism can be affected. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the effects of fluconazole, which is known to inhibit CYP2C9, on imrecoxib's pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters.Methods
In this single-center, single-arm, open-label, self-controlled study, 12 healthy Chinese male volunteers (mean [SD] age, 22.6 [2.43] years) received the following 2 treatments separated by a washout period of 8 days under a fasting state: (1) a single oral dose of imrecoxib 100 mg; and (2) fluconazole 200 mg/d over 6 days followed by concurrent dosing of imrecoxib 100 mg and fluconazole 200 mg. Plasma concentrations of imrecoxib (M0) and its metabolites (4′-hydroxymethyl metabolite [M1] and 4′-carboxylic acid metabolite [M2]) for PK analysis were obtained at 0 (baseline) and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after imrecoxib dosing. Safety and tolerability assessments were performed throughout the study.Findings
All subjects completed the study. There was 1 adverse event; drug-induced liver damage in 1 subject occurred after he received imrecoxib plus fluconazole, and the subject recovered without any sequelae. Coadministration with fluconazole resulted in much higher plasma imrecoxib concentrations, with an increase of 88% in Cmax and 72% in AUC0–t compared with only imrecoxib treatment, which showed that fluconazole may increase plasma exposure to imrecoxib. Fluconazole also caused a small, but not clinically relevant, decrease in M1 and M2 mean Cmax (13% and 14%, respectively), but there was minimal change in M1 and M2 mean AUC0–t (3% and 2%). However, there were no statistically significant differences in vital signs, clinical laboratory test results, ECGs, or adverse events between treatments.Implications
Concurrent administration of imrecoxib and fluconazole did not seem to change imrecoxib's safety profile. The ratio (imrecoxib?+?fluconazole/imrecoxib) for AUC0–t was 1.72 (90% CI, 1.41–2.11) and for Cmax it was 1.88 (90% CI, 1.59–2.21). Hence, it is necessary to adjust the imrecoxib dose when it is concurrently used with other CYP2C9 inhibitors. 相似文献3.
Yun Liu Brian Tomlinson Jiyuan Guo Mahnaz Asgharnejad Lars Bauer Erwin Surmann Xiaojuan Guo Jan-Peer Elshoff 《Clinical therapeutics》2018,40(7):1108-1121.e8
Purpose
The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of the rotigotine transdermal patch is well characterized in Caucasian patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) but not in Chinese subjects. This article reports the PK variables, safety, and tolerability of the rotigotine transdermal patch (2 mg/24 hours and 4 mg/24 hours cold-chain PR2.1.1 formulation) in healthy Chinese subjects (SP0913; NCT01675024). A second study (PD0011; NCT02070796) evaluated the relative bioavailability of cold-chain (PR2.1.1) and room temperature–stable (PR2.2.1) formulations of rotigotine in healthy Chinese men.Methods
In treatment period 1 of SP0913, subjects received a single application of rotigotine 2 mg/24 hours on day 1 followed by a washout period (days 2–6); treatment period 2 (days 6–14) involved multiple doses of rotigotine 2 mg/24 hours (days 7–9) followed by multiple doses of rotigotine 4 mg/24 hours (days 10–12), with patches applied for 24 hours each. In PD0011, subjects received a single dose (2 mg/24 hours) of each rotigotine formulation (PR2.2.1 and PR2.1.1) for 24 hours each in a crossover design. Blood samples were collected at scheduled time points to determine rotigotine plasma concentrations. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by adverse events monitoring.Results
Twenty-four healthy Chinese subjects (12 males, 12 females) were enrolled and completed SP0913. Geometric mean plasma concentrations of unconjugated and total rotigotine increased to a plateau beginning at ～8 hours (multiple dose) to 16 hours (single dose) postdose; no characteristic Tmax was observed for unconjugated and total rotigotine. The respective geometric mean Cmax, Cmax,ss, AUC from zero up to the last analytically quantifiable concentration, and AUC0–24,ss values for unconjugated and total rotigotine were similar when rotigotine 2 mg/24 hours was applied as a single dose or multiple-dose regimen. During the multiple-dose period, geometric mean Cmax,ss and AUC0–24,ss of both unconjugated and total rotigotine were ～2-fold higher for rotigotine 4 mg/24 hours than for rotigotine 2 mg/24 hours. Forty-seven of 50 male Chinese subjects completed PD0011. Primary PK parameters for the room temperature–stable formulation of rotigotine were highly comparable to the cold-chain formulation.Common adverse events included application site pruritus, nausea, dizziness, and constipation (SP0913 only), with no clinically significant changes in other safety measures.Implications
PK profiles and derived PK parameters of unconjugated and total rotigotine in healthy Chinese subjects were consistent with findings from other ethnic groups receiving single and multiple doses of the rotigotine transdermal patch. Single and repeated daily doses of the rotigotine transdermal patch were well tolerated. Room temperature–stable and cold-chain formulations were bioequivalent. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01675024 and NCT02070796. 相似文献4.
Mijeong Son Yukyung Kim Donghwan Lee Hyerang Roh Hankil Son Jinju Guk Seong Bok Jang Su Youn Nam Kyungsoo Park 《Clinical therapeutics》2014
Purpose
Rosuvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, and telmisartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker, are commonly prescribed in combination for the treatment of dyslipidemia accompanied by hypertension. However, the nature of the pharmacokinetic interaction between the 2 drugs is not clearly understood. The goal of the present study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic drug–drug interaction between rosuvastatin and telmisartan in a healthy Korean population.Methods
This was a randomized, 2-part, open-label, 2-period, crossover, multiple-dose study, with each part composed of different subjects between the ages of 20 and 55 years. In part 1, each subject received rosuvastatin 20 mg with and without telmisartan 80 mg once daily for 6 consecutive days. In part 2, each subject received telmisartan 80 mg with and without rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 consecutive days. In both parts, there was a 16-day washout period between mono- and coadministration. Blood samples were collected up to 72 hours after the last dose. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated through interviews and physical examinations.Findings
In part 1, the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios for the primary pharmacokinetic parameters for coadministration of the 2 drugs to monoadministration of each drug were 1.0736–1.2932 for AUCτ and 1.7442–2.3229 for Cmax,ss for rosuvastatin and 0.9942–1.1594 for AUCτ and 1.3593–1.7169 for Cmax,ss for N-desmethyl rosuvastatin, whereas in part 2, the CIs were 1.0834–1.2672 for AUCτ and 1.1534–1.5803 for Cmax,ss for telmisartan. The most frequently noted AE was cough in part 1, which occurred in 2 subjects receiving the combination therapy, and oropharyngeal pain in part 2, which occurred in 3 subjects receiving the combination therapy. All reported AEs were mild or moderate, and there was no significant difference in incidence between the treatments.Implications
These findings demonstrated that rosuvastatin and telmisartan mutually affected each other’s pharmacokinetics, suggesting a possibility of drug–drug interaction. However, based on dose–response characteristics of the 2 drugs and previous results from other interaction studies, the degree of drug interaction observed in this study was not regarded as clinically significant. All treatments were well tolerated, with no serious AEs observed. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01992601. 相似文献5.
Hailan Wu Shengxin Xie Jicheng Yu Yuancheng Chen Jufang Wu Beining Guo Zhenghai Zhu Ying Zhou Zhiqiang Wang Jing Zhang 《Clinical therapeutics》2018,40(9):1548-1555
Purpose
The pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic characteristics of levornidazole were studied in patients with intra-abdominal anaerobic infection to provide the rationale of new clinical dosing regimen of levornidazole.Methods
A single-center, open, multidose trial was conducted in 16 patients with intra-abdominal anaerobic infection. Patients received levornidazole at 500mg q12h by intravenous infusion for 3 to 7days. The plasma samples collected before and after the last dose were analyzed by the LC-MS/MS method to determine the concentration of levornidazole. The PK parameters of levornidazole were calculated, and the PK profiles of levornidazole after the dosing regimen of 750mg q24h for 7days were simulated based on the linear PK profile of levornidazole. Monte Carlo simulation was used for estimating the cumulative fraction of response and probability of target attainment (PTA) of both dosing regimens at steady-state against Bacteroides fragilis.Findings
After administration of the last dose of 500mg of levornidazole, the mean (SD) Cmax_ss, AUC0-12, and t1/2 of levornidazole were 24.0 (5.37) μg/mL, 176.59 (29.22) μg·h/mL, and 11.03 (1.34) hours, respectively. The mean (SD) CLss and Vss of levornidazole were 2.90 (0.47) L/h and 45.90 (7.44) L, respectively. The mean (SD) distribution volume of central compartment (V1) and distribution volume of peripheral compartment (V2) were 26.71 (8.51) L and 19.21 (10.86) L, respectively. On the basis of simulation, the accumulation ratio of levornidazole in the 750mg q24h dosing regimen was 30.2% lower than the value in the 500mg q12h dosing regimen. Forthe 2 dosing regimens, the Cmax_ss, AUC0–τ, AUC0–∞, CLss, and Vss did not produce a significant difference between patients and healthy volunteers (P > 0.05). The cumulative fraction of response of levornidazole against B fragilis was >90%, and the probability of target attainment after both dosing regimens was >90%, when the MIC was ≤1 μg/mL.Implications
No significant differences were found in the PK profiles of levornidazole at steady state between the patients with intra-abdominal anaerobic infection and healthy volunteers. The clinical conventional 750mg q24h regimen can achieve similar clinical and microbiological efficacies against anaerobic in the patients after the 500mg q12h regimen. 相似文献6.
Donghwan Lee MD PhD Hyerang Roh Hankil Son Seong Bok Jang Seoungoh LeeSu Youn Nam MD PhD Kyungsoo Park 《Clinical therapeutics》2014
Purpose
Rosuvastatin is indicated for hypercholesterolemia or dyslipidemia and metformin mainly for type 2 diabetes. These 2 drugs are frequently prescribed in combination due to the high comorbidity of the 2 diseases. However the nature of pharmacokinetic interaction between the 2 drugs has not been previously investigated. The purpose of our study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic interaction between rosuvastatin and metformin in healthy Korean male volunteers.Methods
This was a randomized, open-label, 6-sequence, 3-period, crossover, multiple-dose study. Eligible subjects, aged 20 to 50 years and within 20% of the ideal body weight, received 1 of the following 3 treatments for each period once daily for 5 consecutive days with a 10-day washout period between the treatments: monoadministration of rosuvastatin 10 mg tablet, monoadministration of metformin 750 mg tablet, and coadministration of rosuvastatin 10 mg tablet with metformin 750 mg tablet. Blood samples were collected up to 72 hours after the last dose and pharmacokinetic parameters for rosuvastatin and metformin were compared between combination and monotherapy. Adverse events were investigated and evaluated based on subject interviews and physical examinations.Findings
Among the 36 enrolled subjects, 31 completed the study. The coadministration of rosuvastatin with metformin produced a significant pharmacokinetic interaction in rosuvastatin Css,max, with the 90% CI for the geometric mean ratio (coadministration:monoadministration) being 110.27% to 136.39% (P = 0.0029), whereas no significant interaction was observed in rosuvastatin AUCtau, yielding the 90% CI of 104.41% to 118.95%. When metformin was coadministered with rosuvastatin, no significant pharmacokinetic interaction was observed for Css,max and AUCtau of metformin, yielding the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratio for coadministration to monoadministration as 87.38% to 102.54% and 86.70% to 99.08%, respectively. Overall, 19 mild and 1 moderate adverse events occurred in 12 subjects, with no significant differences in the incidence among the 3 treatments.Implications
Although the Css,max of rosuvastatin was significantly influenced by coadministration with metformin, the degree of interaction seen was considered clinically insignificant, with no significant interaction observed in the other pharmacokinetic measures between the 2 drugs. These results imply that drug effects of rosuvastatin and metformin will also not be significantly influenced by coadministration of the 2 drugs. All treatments were well tolerated and no serious adverse events occurred. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01526317. 相似文献7.
Yong Kyun Kim Dong-Hwan Lee Jaehyun Jeon Hang-Jea Jang Hyeon-Kuk Kim Kyubok Jin Sung-Nam Lim Sung Sook Lee Bong Soo Park Yang Wook Kim Jae-Gook Shin Sungmin Kiem 《Clinical therapeutics》2018,40(8):1384-1395
Purpose
The aim of this study was to investigate the population pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of meropenem in Korean patients with acute infections.Methods
The study included 37 patients with a creatinine clearance ≤50 or >50 mL/min who received a 500- or 1000-mg dose of meropenem, respectively, infused intravenously over 1 hour every 8 hours. Blood samples were collected before and at 1, 1.5, and 5 hours after the start of the fourth infusion. The population PK analysis was conducted by using nonlinear mixed effect modeling software (NONMEM). Monte-Carlo simulations were performed to identify optimal dosing regimens.Findings
Thirty-seven subjects completed the study. Meropenem PK variables were well described by using a one-compartment model. The typical values (relative SE) for weight-normalized clearance (CL) and Vd were 0.266 L/h/kg (12.29%) and 0.489 L/kg (11.01%), respectively. Meropenem CL was significantly influenced by the serum creatinine level, which explained 11% of the interindividual CK variability. The proposed equation to estimate meropenem CL in Korean patients was as follows: CL (L/h)?=?0.266?×?weight?×?[serum creatinine/0.74]–1.017. The simulation results indicate that the current meropenem dosing regimen may be suboptimal in patients infected with normal or augmented renal function.Implications
Prolonged infusions of meropenem over at least 2 hours should be considered, especially in patients with augmented renal function and those infected with pathogens for which the minimum inhibitory meropenem concentration is >1 μg/mL. Our results suggest an individualized meropenem dosing regimen for patients with abnormal renal function and those infected with pathogens with decreased in vitro susceptibility. 相似文献8.
Xiaojiao Li Hong Chen Junqi Niu Guiling Chen Gong Shen Benedetta Massetto Diana M. Brainard Xiaoxue Zhu Hong Zhang Yanhua Ding 《Clinical therapeutics》2018,40(9):1556-1566
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profile of sofosbuvir and its metabolites after a single dose of sofosbuvir 400mg and once daily dosing of sofosbuvir 400mg for 7days in healthy Chinese subjects.Methods
This Phase I, open-label, single- and multiple-dose study enrolled 14 Chinese subjects aged 18 to 45years with an approximately even distribution of healthy male (n?=?9) and nonpregnant, nonlactating female subjects (n?=?5). Subjects received a single oral dose of sofosbuvir 400mg (one tablet) (morning, fasted conditions; single-dose treatment). After a 3-day washout, subjects received oral sofosbuvir 400mg (one tablet) (morning, fasted) for 7days (multiple dose treatment).Findings
No significant accumulation of sofosbuvir, GS-566500, or GS-331007 was observed. Steady state of the major metabolite GS-331007 was achieved after 4days of consecutive dosing with sofosbuvir 400mg once daily. Sofosbuvir was generally well tolerated.Implications
Overall, this study supports the further evaluation of sofosbuvir 400mg in the Chinese population. The pharmacokinetic properties of sofosbuvir, GS-556500, and GS-311007 were found to be broadly similar in healthy Chinese subjects compared with non-Chinese subjects in previous sofosbuvir studies. ChinaDrugTrials.org.cn identifier: CTR20150249. 相似文献9.
Ju-Hee Ryu Joo-Il Kim Hyung Son Kim Gyu-Jeong Noh Kyung-Tae Lee Eun Kyoung Chung 《Clinical therapeutics》2017,39(1):138-149
Purpose
Pelubiprofen is a novel nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antipyretic drug with at least similar efficacy and better tolerability compared with other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antipyretic drugs such as naproxen and aceclofenac. Eperisone hydrochloride is a centrally acting muscle relaxant that performs by blocking calcium channels. The combined use of pelubiprofen and eperisone hydrochloride is increasingly anticipated to promote the clinical effectiveness of pelubiprofen in relieving musculoskeletal symptoms of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and low back pain. No published data are yet available, however, regarding the pharmacokinetic interactions between these 2 drugs when administered concurrently. The objective of this study was to evaluate any pharmacokinetic interactions between pelubiprofen and eperisone hydrochloride in healthy Korean male volunteers.Methods
This was a randomized, open-label, crossover study. Each participant was randomly assigned to 1 of 6 treatment sequences and orally received either 45-mg sustained-release pelubiprofen, 75-mg sustained-release eperisone hydrochloride, or both as a single dose in each treatment period, with a 7-day washout period between each treatment. Serial blood samples were collected over 24 hours after dosing, and plasma concentrations of each drug and the major active metabolite of pelubiprofen (trans-alcohol pelubiprofen) were determined by using a validated HPLC-MS/MS system. Pharmacokinetic analyses were conducted by using noncompartmental methods.Findings
A total of 24 men (mean ± standard deviation of: age, 29 ± 4 years; weight, 72.5 ± 7.8 kg; body mass index, 23.4 ± 1.9 kg/m2) were enrolled, and 23 participants completed the study. For pelubiprofen, the geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) of Cmax and AUC0–∞ were 1.02 (0.87–1.19) and 0.97 (0.88–1.07), respectively. For the major active metabolite of pelubiprofen (trans-alcohol pelubiprofen), the geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) of Cmax and AUC0–∞ were 1.05 (0.98–1.13) and 1.04 (1.01–1.07). For eperisone, the geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) of Cmax and AUC0–∞ were 0.87 (0.67–1.15) and 1.05 (0.85–1.30). None of the study participants experienced serious adverse events during the study.Implications
No clinically significant changes were noted in the pharmacokinetic interactions of pelubiprofen, the major active metabolite of pelubiprofen (trans-alcohol pelubiprofen), and eperisone hydrochloride between monotherapy and combination therapy with 45-mg sustained-release pelubiprofen and 75-mg sustained-release eperisone hydrochloride. 相似文献10.
Hyerang Roh Hankil Son Donghwan Lee HeeChul Chang Chohee Yun Kyungsoo Park 《Clinical therapeutics》2014
Purpose
Rosuvastatin has been widely used in combination with olmesartan for the treatment of dyslipidemia accompanied by hypertension. With no information currently available on the interaction between the 2 drugs, a pharmacokinetic study was conducted to investigate the influence of rosuvastatin on olmesartan and vice versa when the 2 drugs were coadministered. The purpose of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic profile of coadministration of the rosuvastatin 20-mg tablet and the olmesartan 40-mg tablet and the associated drug–drug interaction in healthy Korean male volunteers.Methods
This was a randomized, open-label, 3-period, multiple-dose crossover study. Eligible subjects were aged 20 to 50 years and within 20% of their ideal body weight. After being randomly assigned to 6 groups of equal number, subjects received each of the following 3 formulations once a day for 7 consecutive days with an 8-day washout period between the formulations: rosuvastatin 20-mg tablet, olmesartan 40-mg tablet, and coadministration of the rosuvastatin 20-mg tablet and the olmesartan 40-mg tablet. Blood samples were collected up to 72 hours after dosing, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for rosuvastatin, its active metabolite (N-desmethyl rosuvastatin), and olmesartan. Adverse events were evaluated based on subject interviews and physical examinations.Findings
Among the 36 enrolled subjects, 34 completed the study (mean [range] age, 28.6 [23–49] y; mean [range] weight, 66.4 [52.2–78.7] kg). The 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios for the primary pharmacokinetic parameters for the coadministration of the 2 drugs to the mono-administration of each drug were 85.14% to 96.08% for AUCτ and 81.41% to 97.48% for Css,max for rosuvastatin, and 77.55% to 89.48% for AUCτ and 75.62% to 90.12% for Css,max for N-desmethyl rosuvastatin; those values were 95.61% to 102.57% for AUCτ and 91.73% to 102.98% for Css,max for olmesartan. Dizziness was the most frequently noted adverse drug reaction, occurring in 1 subject receiving mono-administration of rosuvastatin, 1 subject receiving mono-administration of olmesartan, and 4 subjects receiving coadministration of rosuvastatin and olmesartan. All the adverse events were expected, and there was no significant difference in the incidence between the 2 formulations.Implications
This study suggests that rosuvastatin and olmesartan did not significantly influence each other’s pharmacokinetics when coadministered. Although the pharmacokinetics of N-desmethyl rosuvastatin were influenced by olmesartan, such interactions were considered clinically insignificant. All 3 formulations were well tolerated, and no serious adverse events or drug reactions were noted. 相似文献11.
Bai-Li Song Meng Wan Dan Tang Chao Sun Yu-Bing Zhu Nyame Linda Hong-Wei Fan Jian-Jun Zou 《Clinical therapeutics》2018,40(7):1170-1178
Purpose
Some studies in the white population have shown that carriers of at least 1 loss-of-function allele in the gene that encodes the cytochrome P-450 2C19 isozyme (CYP2C19) have lower levels of the clopidogrel active metabolite (CAM) and a reduced antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel. However, data are limited regarding the association between CYP2C19 genetic variants and exposure to CAM and on the pharmacodynamic properties of CAM in the Chinese population. Data from the white population cannot be extrapolated to the Chinese population because of the marked interethnic differences in CYP2C19 variants. This study was aimed to investigate the influence of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetic properties of CAM and the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel in healthy Chinese volunteers, and to provide evidence for the role of a CYP2C19 genotyping test in predicting the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel in the Chinese population.Methods
Twenty healthy subjects received a single 300-mg dose of clopidogrel and were assigned to 1 of 3 groups according to CYP2C19 genotype: CYP2C19 *1/*1 (normal metabolizers [NM]; n?=?8), CYP2C19 *1/*2 or *3 (intermediate metabolizers [IM]; n?=?10) and CYP2C19 *2/*2 or *3 and *3/*3 (poor metabolizers [PM]; n?=?2). Blood samples were collected at baseline and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after administration. The plasma concentrations of clopidogrel and CAM were analyzed by LC-MS/MS, and adenosine diphosphate–induced platelet aggregation was measured by light-transmittance aggregometry.Findings
There were no significant differences in Cmax and AUC0–t of clopidogrel prodrug in the NM group compared with the IM and PM groups. The mean CAM Cmax value was significantly higher in the NM group than in IM and PM groups (45.39 [12.57] vs 29.15 [7.92] ng/mL [P?=?0.003] and 19.55 [2.19] ng/mL [P?=?0.004], respectively). The mean CAM AUC0–t value was significantly higher in the NM group than in the IM and PM groups (61.05 [21.63] vs 37.67 [11.01] ng · h/mL [P?=?0.007] and 27.08 [2.72] ng · h/mL [P?=?0.016]). The NM group exhibited a significantly higher percentage of inhibition of platelet aggregation than did the IM or PM group (P?=?0.001). The correlations between the pharmacokinetic properties (Cmax, AUC0–t) of CAM and the pharmacodynamic data (maximal and inhibition of platelet aggregation) were significant (both, Pearson r > 0.5 and P < 0.01).Implication
In these healthy Chinese subjects, carriers of CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele(s) had significantly reduced exposure of CAM and decreased levels of inhibition of platelet aggregation with clopidogrel; these genotypes therefore might be a determinant for the formation of CAM and its antiplatelet effects. Study identifier: ChiCTR-OCH-14004382. 相似文献12.
Robert Wilson Emily Jarvis Mickael Montembault J. Nicole Hamblin Edith M. Hessel Anthony Cahn 《Clinical therapeutics》2018,40(8):1410-1417
Purpose
Novel therapies to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are highly desirable. The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of nemiralisib, a phosphoinositide 3-kinase δ inhibitor, administered via the Ellipta dry powder inhaler (GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina) was evaluated, including an assessment of oral bioavailability.Methods
This single-center, 3-part, placebo-controlled trial in 22 healthy subjects evaluated single (100 and 200 μg) and repeat (200 μg for 10 days) doses of inhaled nemiralisib in parts A (n?=?12) and B (n?=?12) (double-blind) and single doses of inhaled nemiralisib (200 µg) with and without charcoal block in Part C (n?=?6) (open-label, 2-period, crossover). There was a minimum 14-day washout period between dosing days.Findings
21 subjects completed the study, mean age was similar in the three parts (A: 49 years; B: 44 years; C: 55 years). After single doses of nemiralisib, observed plasma Cmax dropped rapidly, followed by a slower elimination phase. Near-dose proportionality was observed: mean (95% CI) plasma Cmax and AUC0–24 values were 174.3 pg/mL (96.9–313.3) and 694.6 pg·h/mL (503.5–958.2) for 100 μg and 398.9 pg/mL (318.3–500.1) and 1699.6 pg·h/mL (1273.3–2268.7) for 200 μg, respectively. Repeat dosing for 10 days showed exposures ～2- to 4-fold higher than on the single dose (peak, trough, and AUC0–24 levels), achieving steady-state by day 6. Mean AUC0–24 was 2193.6 pg·h/mL and 1645.3 pg·h/mL in the absence/presence of charcoal. Two non–drug-related adverse events were observed; neither was serious or resulted in withdrawal.Implications
Inhalation of nemiralisib was well tolerated in these healthy subjects. Plasma pharmacokinetic variables were well defined, and charcoal block data indicate that ～23% of the total systemic exposure after inhalation from Ellipta was attributable to orally absorbed drug. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02691325. 相似文献13.
Vikas K. Dawra Vaishali Sahasrabudhe Yali Liang Kyle Matschke Haihong Shi Anne Hickman Didier Saur Steven G. Terra David L. Cutler 《Clinical therapeutics》2018,40(9):1538-1547
Purpose
Ertugliflozin is a selective sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor being developed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The primary enzyme involved in the metabolism of ertugliflozin is uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A9, with minor contributions from UGT2B7 and cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes 3A4, 3A5, and 2C8. Rifampin induces UGT1A9, UGT2B7, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5. Because concurrent induction of these enzymes could affect ertugliflozin exposure, this study assessed the effect of multiple doses of rifampin on the pharmacokinetic properties of single-dose ertugliflozin.Methods
Twelve healthy adult subjects were enrolled in this open-label, 2-period, fixed-sequence study and received ertugliflozin 15mg on day 1 of period 1, followed by rifampin 600mg once daily on days 1 to 10 in period 2. On day 8 of period 2, ertugliflozin 15mg was coadministered with rifampin 600mg. Plasma samples for ertugliflozin pharmacokinetic analysis were collected during 72hours after dosing on day 1 of period 1 and day 8 of period 2 and analyzed using a validated HPLC-MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis of concentration-time data. Natural log transformed AUC0–∞ and Cmax of ertugliflozin were analyzed using a mixed-effects model with treatment as a fixed effect and subject as a random effect.Findings
After administration of ertugliflozin 15mg alone or with rifampin, the Tmax was 1hour. The mean t½ was 12.3hours for ertugliflozin alone and 9.2hours with steady-state rifampin. Geometric mean ratios for AUC0–∞ and Cmax were 61.2% (90% CI, 57.2%–65.4%) and 84.6% (90% CI, 74.2%–96.5%), respectively. Ertugliflozin was well tolerated when administered alone or with rifampin.Implications
Coadministration of ertugliflozin with rifampin decreased ertugliflozin AUC0–∞ and Cmax by 39% and 15%, respectively. The effect of the reduced exposure was evaluated using the ertugliflozin dose-response model. The model predicted that a 5-mg ertugliflozin dose after coadministration with rifampin is expected to maintain clinically meaningful glycemic efficacy. Therefore, no dose adjustment of ertugliflozin is recommended when ertugliflozin is coadministered with a UGT and CYP inducer, such as rifampin. 相似文献14.
Jiaqing Wang Xia Chen Baoshi Yuan Weicong Wang Chunmin Xu Weiwei Zhao Pengpeng Zhao Yilong Wang Xingquan Zhao Yongjun Wang 《Clinical therapeutics》2018,40(10):1683-1691
Purpose
Edaravone is a free-radical scavenger. Edaravone 30mg IV has been approved for use in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke in Japan and China, and for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Japan and the United States. Considering the inconvenience of IV infusion in clinical practice, an oral tablet formulation of edaravone was developed but failed in 2011 due to poor bioavailability. More recently, a sublingual (SL) tablet formulation of edaravone 30mg was developed by a Good Manufacturing Practices–compliant manufacturer in China. This study explored the bioavailability of the SL tablet of edaravone and aimed to provide evidence to support decision making in future clinical development.Methods
This 2-way crossover study was conducted in 10 healthy male volunteers. Eligible subjects were randomized, in a 1:1 ratio, to 1 of 2 dosing sequences: (1) SL edaravone 30mg, followed by edaravone 30mg IV infusion given over 30 minutes; or (2) edaravone 30mg IV infusion given over 30 minutes, followed by SL edaravone 30mg. The washout period between the 2 dosing periods was at least 24hours. Serial blood samples were collected in each dosing period. The bioavailability of the SL tablet was assessed using bioavailability analysis. Tolerability was evaluated throughout the study.Findings
The plasma concentration–time profile of the SL tablet was similar to that with the IV infusion. Amean (SD) Cmax of 2030.2 (517.2) ng/mL was reached within a median Tmax of 0.875hour, which was statistically significantly longer than the median Tmax with IV administration (0.5 hour). The Cmax with SL administration corresponded to 83.92% (90% CI, 73.22%–96.18%) of the Cmax with the start of IV infusion (2354.0 [336.6] ng/mL). The mean AUC0–t with SL dosing was 5420.07 (1429.75) h · ng/mL, which corresponded to 91.94% (90% CI, 86.81%–97.39%) of the AUC0–t with IV administration (5824.42 [1338.48] h · ng/mL). Two cases of adverse events were reported during the study; both were considered by the investigator to have been possibly not related to the study treatment.Implications
The bioavailability of the SL tablet of edaravone was 91.94%. Compared with IV administration, Cmax with SL administration was ～17% lower and Tmax was statistically significantly longer. The exposure differences can be addressed by modifying the strength of the SL tablet, and then conducting a second study to demonstrate the pharmacokinetic bioavailability of the sublingually administered new strength versus IV infusion of edaravone. 相似文献15.
Purpose
Fenfluramine is being developed as a low-dose adjunctive treatment for seizures in patients with Dravet syndrome and other epileptic encephalopathies, including Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Most patients with Dravet syndrome receive multiple antiepileptic drugs, making it challenging for caregivers to track correct administration times. The present Phase I study was conducted to determine the effect of food on the pharmacokinetic properties of fenfluramine.Methods
Healthy nonsmoking subjects aged 18 to 50 years were enrolled in an open-label, crossover, Phase I pharmacokinetic and safety profile study and received 2 single 0.8-mg/kg doses of ZX008 (fenfluramine hydrochloride oral solution), 1 after a 10-hour overnight fast and the other 30 minutes after the start of consumption of a high-fat breakfast, in a randomly assigned order. A washout period of at least 9 days separated the 2 treatment periods. Venous blood samples were taken before each dose and periodically for 72 hours after each dose for determination of concentrations of fenfluramine and its active metabolite norfenfluramine. Plasma pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated for each subject by noncompartmental analysis.Findings
In the 13 subjects completing both treatment periods, food had no effect on the rate or extent of absorption and bioavailability of fenfluramine as assessed by fed vs fasted adjusted geometric mean observed plasma Cmax (59.1 vs 56.7 ng/mL; NS) and AUC0–∞ (1640 vs 1600 ng?·?h/mL; NS). Additionally, there was no impact of food on systemic exposure of norfenfluramine. Seven subjects reported at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event; all treatment-emergent adverse events were mild in severity.Implications
The bioequivalence and tolerability of single 0.8-mg/kg oral doses of ZX008 in the fed and fasted states support ZX008 administration without regard to meals. 相似文献16.
Ruth Plummer Henk M. Verheul Filip Y. F. L. De Vos Karin Leunen L. Rhoda Molife Christian Rolfo Peter Grundtvig-Sørensen Jacques De Grève Sylvie Rottey Guy Jerusalem Antoine Italiano James Spicer Luc Dirix Carsten Goessl Joseph Birkett Stuart Spencer Maria Learoyd Christopher Bailey Emma Dean 《Advances in therapy》2018,35(11):1945-1964
Introduction
The PARP inhibitor olaparib is efficacious as monotherapy and has potential application in combination with endocrine therapy for the treatment of breast cancer. This phase I study assessed the safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of olaparib combined with tamoxifen, anastrozole or letrozole in patients with advanced solid tumours.Methods
During part A, PK profiles were assessed in three consecutive treatment periods: (1) olaparib (tablet) 300 mg bid, days 1–5 followed by a 4-day washout; (2) cohort 1, tamoxifen 60 mg loading dose qd days 10–13, 20 mg qd days 14–26; cohort 2, anastrozole 1 mg qd days 10–19; cohort 3, letrozole 2.5 mg qd days 10–38; (3) as for period 2, with concomitant olaparib 300 mg bid for 5 days. Patients could then enter part B and receive olaparib monotherapy (300 mg bid continuously). Safety was assessed in parts A and B until 12 months after the last patient entered part B.Results
Seventy-nine patients (20.3% with breast cancer) received treatment in part A; 72 completed part A and 69 entered part B. Anastrozole and letrozole had no effect on the PK profile of olaparib and vice versa. Co-administration with tamoxifen produced a modest decrease in exposure to olaparib [geometric least-squares mean (GLSmean) Cmax,ss and AUC0–τ decreased by 20% (90% CI 0.71–0.90) and 27% (0.63–0.84), respectively]. Exposure to tamoxifen was slightly increased when combined with olaparib [GLSmean Cmax,ss and AUC0–τ increased by 13% (1.06–1.22) and 16% (1.11–1.21), respectively]; however, the 90% CI fell within the 0.7–1.43 boundary and there were no changes in exposure to tamoxifen metabolites. The safety profile for olaparib alone and in combination with the antihormonal therapies was acceptable.Conclusions
The combination of olaparib and either anastrozole, letrozole or tamoxifen was generally well tolerated, with no clinically relevant PK interactions identified.Funding
AstraZeneca.Clinical Trial Registration
NCT02093351.17.
Yunona Khomitskaya Nadezhda Tikhonova Konstantin Gudkov Svetlana Erofeeva Victoria Holmes Brian Dayton Nigel Davies David W. Boulton Weifeng Tang 《Clinical therapeutics》2018,40(4):550-561.e3
Purpose
Fixed-combination drug products (FCDPs) combining dapagliflozin and metformin extended release (XR) may provide patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with an alternative antihyperglycemic treatment, which could improve adherence by reducing tablet burden. This study evaluated the bioequivalence of dapagliflozin/metformin XR FCDP versus the co-administration of the individual monotherapy tablets currently available for use in the Russian Federation.Methods
Healthy subjects aged 18 to 45 years were enrolled in this randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study, conducted in a single Russian center. Pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC0–t, Cmax, and Cmax/AUC0–t) were used to assess bioequivalence of dapagliflozin/metformin XR (10/1000 mg) FCDP to the individual component tablets (dapagliflozin [10 mg] plus metformin XR [2 × 500 mg]) under standard fed conditions. Safety and tolerability were also assessed.Findings
Forty healthy subjects were included (47.5% male; mean age, 30 years; and mean body mass index, 24.2 kg/m2). Dapagliflozin and metformin XR in the FCDP were bioequivalent to the individual component tablets marketed in the Russian Federation, with the 90% CIs of the geometric least-squares mean ratios for all key pharmacokinetic parameters being contained within the 80% to 125% bioequivalence limits. Both FCDP and the individual component formulations were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events.Implications
Bioequivalence of dapagliflozin/metformin XR FCDP and the individual components was established without any new safety concerns, presenting a safe alternative for patients currently receiving regimens including each component individually. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02722239. 相似文献18.
Purpose
Morphine ARER is a novel oral, abuse-deterrent, extended-release (ER) formulation of morphine sulfate with physical and chemical properties that deter misuse and abuse by nonoral routes of administration. Here we evaluate the relative bioavailability of morphine ARER and extended-release morphine.Methods
This single-dose, 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence, randomized crossover study in healthy adult subjects compared the relative bioavailability of morphine ARER 100 mg to that of ER morphine 100 mg in the fasted condition. At 12 and 1.5 hours before dosing and 12 hours after dosing, all subjects received a 50-mg oral naltrexone tablet to minimize opioid-related side effects. Pharmacokinetic parameters including the AUC0–t, AUC0–∞, and Cmax of morphine and its metabolite morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) were determined at various times up to 48 hours postdose. The bioequivalence of morphine ARER and ER morphine was determined using an ANOVA of the least-squares mean values of morphine and M6G bioavailability.Findings
Forty-nine subjects completed the study. Both morphine ARER and ER morphine exhibited peak plasma morphine and M6G concentrations of ～30 ng/mL and ～200 ng/mL, respectively, at 3 hours postdose. The 90% CIs of the ln-transformed values of morphine AUC0–t, AUC0–∞, and Cmax were within the 80% to 125% range for bioequivalence. M6G values also indicated bioequivalence of morphine ARER and ER morphine. The most common adverse events were nausea and somnolence.Implications
These data show that, in these subjects, morphine ARER was bioequivalent to ER morphine, a treatment for pain with well-established efficacy and safety profiles. 相似文献19.
Vaishali Sahasrabudhe Steven G. Terra Anne Hickman Didier Saur Sangeeta Raje Haihong Shi Kyle Matschke Susan Zhou David L. Cutler 《Clinical therapeutics》2018,40(10):1701-1710
Purpose
Ertugliflozin, an oral, highly selective inhibitor of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2, is approved in the United States and the European Union for the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Hepatic impairment may affect, to varying degrees, the absorption, metabolism, and excretion of drugs and may be associated with a lower plasma protein binding compared with that in healthy individuals. This study was conducted to assess the effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetic (PK), safety, and tolerability profiles of ertugliflozin after administration of a single, 15-mg oral dose.Methods
This was a Phase I, open-label, single-dose study in healthy individuals (n?=?8) and those with moderate hepatic impairment (n?=?8). Eligible participants were men or women aged 18 to 75years with a body mass index of 18.0 to 40.5 kg/m2. Healthy individuals had normal hepatic function; patients with hepatic impairment had a Child-Pugh score of 7 to 9 points (moderate hepatic impairment). Blood samples were collected before dosing and during 96hours after dosing for evaluation of PK parameters. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study.Findings
The adjusted least squares geometric meanratios for total ertugliflozin AUC0–∞ and Cmax inpatients with moderate hepatic impairment comparedwith healthy individuals were 87.4% (90% CI, 68.1%–112.2%) and 78.7% (90% CI, 65.7%–94.2%), respectively. The AUC0–∞ and Cmax for unbound ertugliflozin were also similar between patients with moderate hepatic impairment and healthy individuals. Mean half-life estimates for ertugliflozin were similar (14.6vs 13.8 hours) in patients with moderate hepatic impairment and healthy individuals. The number of participants with all-causality treatment-emergent adverse events was similar for both groups (2 of 8 patients with moderate hepatic impairment and 3 of 8 healthy individuals).Implications
Moderate hepatic impairment had no clinically relevant effect on the PK and safety profiles of ertugliflozin. The results of this study support a recommendation for no dose adjustment of ertugliflozin in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. Ertugliflozin was well tolerated when administered tohealthy individuals and patients with moderate hepatic impairment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02115347. 相似文献20.