The influence of donor factors other than serologic status on transmission of cytomegalovirus to transplant recipients

Organs transplanted from donors who are seropositive for CMV are a well-known source of CMV infection in their recipients. Such organs appear to contain latent virus that reactivates following transplantation. However, not all grafts from seropositive donors are observed to transmit CMV, either because of differing immune function among recipients, or content of transmissible virus among donors. To explore these variables, we conducted a 3-year prospective survey involving 140 CMV-seronegative kidney and heart recipients, using a sensitive assay for CMV antibody to classify donors and recipients, and detect posttransplant primary infection. We found that none of 64 recipients of a CMV-seronegative organ, and 40 of 68 (58%) recipients of a CMV-seropositive organ, developed primary CMV infection. Analysis of recipient factors in the latter group showed no significant differences in underlying disease, age, and immunosuppressive therapy between the 58% who did develop CMV infection after receiving a CMV-seropositive organ, and the 42% who did not. In 9 pairs of recipients, each pair of whom received organs from the same CMV-seropositive cadaver donor, there was complete concordance of outcomes within pairs. In 4 pairs, both recipients developed CMV infection, whereas in the remaining 5 pairs, neither recipient did so. These observations suggest that only a subset of CMV-seropositive donors carry latent CMV that reactivates posttransplant, and that donor factors other than seropositivity are important in determining the infectivity of transplanted organs.     

Prevention of cytomegalovirus-related death by passive immunization. A double-blind placebo-controlled study in kidney transplant recipients treated for rejection

In a double-blind placebo-controlled study, the value of prophylactic anti-CMV immunoglobulin administration was evaluated in 39 kidney transplant recipients treated for rejection with rabbit antithymocyte globulin. Passive immunization completely prevented CMV-related death, although it did not reduce the incidence of CMV isolation, viremia, or disease. The effect of passive immunization was exclusively observed in CMV-seronegative recipients of a CMV-seropositive kidney donor. It could be demonstrated even when instituted when antirejection therapy was started. Seropositive recipients did not benefit from immunoglobulin treatment. Moreover, CMV-seronegative recipients of a kidney from a seronegative donor were not at risk for CMV infection at all. Therefore passive immunization should be restricted to seronegative recipients of seropositive allograft donors treated for rejection.     

Which renal transplant patients should receive cytomegalovirus immune globulin? A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Our study objective was to determine the cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis with cytomegalovirus immune globulin for preventing CMV-associated disease in renal transplant patients. We used a decision analytic model applied to 5 groups of renal transplant recipients at varying risks of developing CMV-associated disease. We obtained the rates of developing CMV-associated disease, graft rejection, and mortality, and the effectiveness of CMV-IG from the published literature. We used actual variable costs of CMV-IG, hospitalization, dialysis, and outpatient follow-up. The incremental cost of administering CMV-IG compared with withholding it ranged from $29,800 per life saved for the highest risk group, CMV-seronegative recipients of kidneys from CMV-seropositive cadaveric donors, to $1.68 million per additional life saved for the lowest risk group, CMV-seronegative recipients of grafts from CMV-seronegative donors. The outcome was somewhat sensitive to the effectiveness of CMV-IG in preventing CMV-associated disease but not sensitive to wide variations in CMV-IG costs, dialysis costs, outpatient costs, and the probability of graft rejection. Our conclusion is that prophylaxis with CMV-IG is very worthwhile for renal transplant recipients at high risk of CMV-associated disease and is possibly worthwhile for some patients at lower risk. The cost-effectiveness of other strategies for preventing CMV-associated disease, such as prophylaxis with acyclovir, CMV vaccine, or unselected immune globulin, should be compared with CMV-IG.     

Failure of ganciclovir prophylaxis to completely eradicate CMV disease in renal transplant recipients treated with intense anti-rejection immunotherapy

Ganciclovir prophylactic regimens have been shown to be effective in renal transplant recipients at risk for primary (donor seropositive/recipient seronegative) and secondary (recipient seropositive) cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease. However, in addition to serologic factors, the type and intensity of the administered immunosuppression is a strong risk factor for CMV disease. Since January 1995, we have utilized a potent immunosuppressive protocol selectively in recipients at high risk for immunologic graft loss, defined as retransplant recipients, recipients with delayed graft function, non-Caucasian recipients, and recipients suffering from acute rejection. Between January 1995 and December 1996, 110 consecutive renal transplants were performed in recipients who were either CMV seropositive or received an allograft from a CMV-seropositive donor. All recipients received ganciclovir prophylactic therapy for 3 months post-transplant. Group I (N = 43) consisted of recipients at high-immunologic risk for graft loss as defined above. These recipients were treated with an intense anti-rejection immunotherapeutic regimen consisting of Cellcept, Neoral, and prednisone, with the frequent addition of antilymphocyte antibody therapies and intravenous methylprednisolone. The remaining 67 recipients (group II) were treated with a less intense immunotherapeutic regimen consisting of azathioprine, Neoral, and prednisone. The incidence and severity of CMV disease and the patient and allograft survival were compared. The incidence of CMV syndrome was greater in group I (28%) compared with group II (7%), and was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The 1-yr patient and graft survival were similar, 95 and 91%, respectively, for group I compared with 97 and 97%, respectively, for group II. These data suggest that 3 months of ganciclovir prophylactic therapy is significantly less effective for the prevention of CMV disease in renal transplant recipients at high risk for acute rejection treated with an intense immunotherapeutic regimen. These data suggest that more effective prevention of CMV disease in these high-risk recipients will require the addition of other anti-viral agents, such as immunoglobulin preparation to the prophylactic regimen.     

Effect of Donor Factors on Early Graft Survival in Adult Cadaveric Renal Transplantation

Previous studies of the effect of donor factors on renal transplant outcomes have not tested the role of recipient body mass index, donor/recipient weight ratios and age matching, and other factors. We analyzed 20,309 adult (age 16 or older) recipients having solitary cadaveric renal transplants from adult donors from 1 July 1994 to 30 June 1998 in an historical cohort study (the 2000 United States Renal Data System) of death censored graft loss by the Cox proportional hazards models, which corrected for characteristics thought to affect outcomes. The only independently significant findings in Cox Regression analysis were a high donor/ recipient age ratio (> or = 1.10, e.g. a 55-year-old donor given to a recipient age 50years or younger, adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 3.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.36-4.39) and African American donor kidneys (AHR 1.64, 95% CI, 1.24-2.17). African American recipients and older donors were not at independently increased risk of graft failure in this model. Among donor factors, older donor kidneys given to younger recipients and donor African American kidneys were independently associated with graft loss in recipients of cadaver kidneys. The task for the transplant community should be to find the best means for managing all donor organs without discouraging organ donation.     

The role of pretransplant immunity in protection from cytomegalovirus disease following renal transplantation

To determine the extent to which pretransplant immunity resulting from natural infection protects against cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease, we analyzed CMV serology on 153 kidney donor and recipient pairs and followed transplant patients to determine incidence and severity of CMV disease. The overall incidence of CMV disease was 22%. Significant differences occurred in CMV disease incidence and severity, depending on the immune status of the kidney donor and recipient. Among recipients of kidneys from seropositive donors, immunity offered significant protection from CMV disease, reducing its incidence from 61% in nonimmune to 24% in immune patients (P less than 0.01). Pretransplant immune patients also had fever CMV-related complications. Among recipients of kidneys from seronegative donors, pretransplant immunity conferred a significant risk of CMV disease; immune patients had a 20% incidence of CMV disease compared with 2% in nonimmune patients (P less than 0.02). Disease was generally mild in all patients receiving kidneys from CMV infection had a 3-fold higher incidence of CMV disease than patients with reactivation infection (P less than 0.01). The incidence of CMV disease was similar in immune patients, whether they received a kidney from a seropositive or a seronegative donor. However, an important observation was that disease was significantly more severe in immune patients receiving a kidney from a seropositive donor (P less than 0.05). This indicates that if kidneys from seropositive donors are selected for use only in seropositive recipients, this places the immune patient at a higher risk for severe CMV disease. We conclude that pretransplant immunity offers a significant advantage to patients receiving kidneys from seropositive donors.     

Cytomegalovirus disease after prophylaxis with oral ganciclovir in renal transplantation: the importance of HLA-DR matching

This study assessed the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease and associated outcomes after oral ganciclovir prophylaxis in renal transplantation. A retrospective analysis was performed of all adult renal transplant recipients at a single transplant center transplanted between August 16, 1996, and December 31, 2000. CMV disease prophylaxis included ganciclovir 1000 mg orally thrice daily prescribed for 90 d in D-/R+ cases and 180 d in D+/R- and D+/R+ cases. Forty (9.1%) of 470 patients studied were diagnosed with CMV disease, which varied significantly by CMV serostatus and number of HLA-DR matches. The highest incidence of disease, 26.2%, was in D+/R- patients with zero HLA-DR matches. Five-year graft survival was 56.8% with CMV disease compared with 79.1% without (P < 0.001). Five-year graft survival with CMV disease was 75.9% with one or two HLA-DR matches versus 16.2% with zero HLA-DR matches (P < 0.001). CMV remains an important factor in long-term graft survival after oral ganciclovir prophylaxis. However, we have observed that the adverse impact of CMV disease on graft survival is apparent only in patients with zero HLA-DR matches. These results call for the development of new CMV disease prophylaxis and treatment strategies in patients with zero HLA-DR matches. In addition, organ allocation policies discouraging combining CMV-seropositive donors and zero HLA-DR matches may be worth consideration.     

Use of kidneys from hepatitis C seropositive donors shortens waitlist time but does not alter one-yr outcome

Utilization of hepatitis C seropositive kidney donors remains controversial. We examined the use of hepatitis C seropositive donors for renal transplantation. Data for creatinine, liver function tests, cold ischemia time, and graft and patient survival were analyzed from 20 hepatitis C seropositive recipients receiving cadaveric renal allografts from seropositive donors and were compared with 20 hepatitis C seropositive recipients receiving allografts from seronegative donors. Recipients receiving a kidney from a hepatitis C seropositive donor were on the waitlist for 9.9 +/- 1.8 months, compared with 17.8 +/- 3.3 months for those receiving a kidney from a seronegative donor (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in graft or patient survival. Incidences of acute cellular rejection and acute tubular necrosis were similar. There were no significant differences in creatinine, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, or bilirubin values. While there was a significant difference in aspartate aminotransferase at 2 wk and 6 months, these differences were of questionable clinical importance. In conclusion, donor seropositivity for hepatitis C should not preclude renal transplantation into a hepatitis C seropositive recipient and utilization of these organs decreases waitlist time for hepatitis C seropositive recipients.     

Symptomatic cytomegalovirus disease in the cytomegalovirus antibody seropositive renal transplant recipient treated with OKT3.

A prospective study to investigate risk factors for CMV disease was conducted in 94 renal transplant recipients. CMV disease was defined as either unexplained fever for greater than 3 days with viremia or unexplained fever for greater than 3 days with isolation of CMV from the urine or throat wash and at least one of the following: leukopenia, elevated serum alanine aminotransferase, or biopsy-proved invasive tissue infection of the lung or gastrointestinal tract. Fifty-three patients received immunosuppressive regimens consisting of prednisone and cyclosporine, with or without azathioprine. The remaining 41 patients were treated with these agents plus OKT3 (21 received OKT3 to treat rejection, 20 received OKT3 prophylactically). Thirty-seven patients were at minimal risk of CMV disease (donor and recipient seronegative for CMV); 12 patients were at risk of primary disease (donor seropositive, recipient seronegative), and 45 were at risk of reactivation disease (recipient seropositive at the time of transplantation). The incidences of CMV disease in the 3 groups were 0%, 58%, and 36%, respectively. Although the incidence of CMV disease in patients at risk of primary disease was not influenced by the immunosuppressive regimen, immunosuppression had a profound effect on the occurrence of CMV disease in CMV-seropositive transplant recipients. The incidence of CMV disease in those receiving OKT3 was 59%; but only 21% in those who did not receive OKT3. OKT3 increased the risk of CMV disease five-fold (odds ratio 5.2 (95% confidence limits 1.4-17.5)). In the CMV-seropositive patient, OKT3 was also the most important predictor of CMV disease by multivariate analysis (P less than 0.002). A pilot study of preemptive therapy with ganciclovir (2.5 mg/kg daily during OKT3 therapy) in 17 patients decreased the incidence of CMV disease without appreciable toxicity.     

Renal transplantations performed using non-heart-beating organ donors: going back to the future?

BACKGROUND: As more expanded-criteria organ donors are used to bridge the widening gap between organ supply and demand, non-heart-beating (NHB) donors will become increasingly important. The purpose of this study was to analyze renal transplant outcomes using this source of cadaveric (CAD) organs and compare the results with heart-beating organ sources. METHODS: Data from 98,698 adult CAD renal transplant recipients and 34,531 living donor renal transplant recipients registered in the U. S. Renal Data System database between January 1993 and June 2000 were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare graft and patient survival rates between NHB, CAD, and living donor transplant recipients. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify risk factors for NHB donor recipients, while adjusting for potential confounding variables. RESULTS: Recipients of NHB donor organs experienced nearly twice the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) compared with heart-beating donors (42.4% vs. 23.3%, respectively). NHB donor transplants experienced comparable allograft survival when compared with CAD transplants at 6 years (73.2% vs. 72.5%, respectively; P=NS); patient survival was greater at 6 years for NHB compared with CAD renal transplant recipients (80.9% vs. 77.8%, respectively; P=NS). Significant factors for allograft loss for NHB donor organ recipients included the following: organ used for repeat transplants; DGF; donor age older than 35 years; and head trauma as a cause of initial injury (relative risk 2.74, 1.90, 1.78, and 1.41, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although exhibiting elevated DGF rates, allograft and patient survival rates of transplants from NHB donor sources are equivalent to those from conventional CAD sources. Donor age, recipient transplant number, female recipient, mechanism of injury, and DGF were the most pertinent variables leading to poor outcomes.     

The adverse impact of cytomegalovirus infection on clinical outcome in cyclosporine-prednisone treated renal allograft recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection was diagnosed in 28% (n = 144) of 516 renal allograft recipients treated with cyclosporine-prednisone (CsA-Pred) immunosuppressive therapy. The majority of infections produced either asymptomatic (n = 37) or mild-to-moderate (n = 75) clinical disease, while 10% were lethal (n = 14). Transplantation from a seropositive donor to a seronegative recipient was associated with an increased incidence of (CMV) infection but did not predispose to more severe clinical disease. Similarly, donor source (cadaver [CAD] vs. living-related donor [LRD]), age greater than or equal to 45 years, and antecedent pulse steroid therapy for the treatment of acute rejection were not correlated with clinically more severe disease. An increase in serum creatinine to greater than or equal to 25% of preinfection nadir values occurred in association with CMV infection in 106 patients, returning to nadir values or below in 74.5% of these individuals. CMV infection did not impact on actual patient survival among recipients of LRD or CAD allografts or on actual 1-year HLA-haploidentical or HLA-identical LRD graft survival. In contrast, actual 1-year cadaveric graft survival was significantly lower among CMV-infected (n = 95) vs. uninfected (n = 198) patients (75.8% vs. 87.8%, P = .01). In association with the finding of reduced actual 1-year CAD graft survival, CMV-infected patients were found to be more predisposed to develop acute rejection episodes. Of the CMV-infected CAD graft recipients, 48.4% developed greater than or equal to 1 acute rejection episode during the first year following transplantation vs. 25.3% of their uninfected counterparts (P less than .001). The impact of CMV infection in CsA-Pred treated renal transplant recipients does not differ substantially from that reported historically in association with prednisone-azathioprine immunosuppressive therapy.     

Intermediate outcomes of dual renal allografts: the University of Washington experience

PURPOSE: The increased survival advantage of renal transplantation with end stage renal disease combined with an increasing incidence of renal disease fuel an increasing disparity between supply and demand for transplantable kidneys. Despite efforts to increase cadaveric organ donation through education and publicity, the number of cadaveric kidneys transplanted has not increased and in the last year was surpassed by kidneys transplanted from living donors. In an effort to maximize cadaver organ donors use of kidneys from expanded criteria donors has been investigated. In select cases both donor kidneys have been transplanted into a single recipient, which is called dual renal transplant. We report on the 4-year dual renal transplant graft and patient outcomes and compare these to age matched single cadaver kidney transplants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 10 dual renal transplant recipients and 10 age matched single cadaver kidney recipients was performed. All patients underwent transplantation at our university between January 1996 and February 1998. Mean followup was 4.1 years (range 2.5 to 5.1) for the dual kidney recipients and 3.6 (0.0 to 5.5) years for the control group. RESULTS: Of the 10 dual renal transplant recipients 7 remain alive and 3 died of nontransplant related causes. Of the 10 single recipients 8 are alive, 1 died of postoperative complications and 1 died of nontransplant related causes. When censored for death with a functioning graft, 7 of 10 dual grafts are functioning at followup with a mean creatinine clearance of 39.4 ml. per minute (range 16.1 to 65.9) and mean serum creatinine of 2.0 mg./dl. (1.1 to 3.9). If not censored for death with a functioning graft, 50% of dual grafts are functioning. Of the 3 graft losses 2 were due to recurrent disease and 1 was attributed to chronic rejection. In the control group 8 of 10 grafts are functioning at current followup (regardless of censoring for death with a functioning graft) with a mean creatinine clearance of 48.7 ml. per minute (range 23.4 to 66.5) and mean serum creatinine of 1.6 mg./dl. (1.2 to 2.4). Of the 2 graft losses 1 resulted from postoperative complications and 1 was due to chronic rejection. CONCLUSIONS At the 4-year followup patients undergoing dual renal transplant have comparable graft function, incidence of graft loss and survival compared to the control group. However, because of our small sample size, differences in the 2 groups may be significant in a larger study. Additional studies need to be conducted to determine if this practice represents an acceptable use of kidneys from expanded criteria donors.     

Transplanting kidneys from donors with prior hepatitis B infection: one response to the organ shortage

While the number of cadaveric organ donors remains relatively stable, the number of patients awaiting transplantation continues to increase, creating a shortage of donor organs. To address this imbalance, there is interest in transplanting organs formerly considered marginal or undesirable. Thus, more organs are currently transplanted from living donors, older donors, hemodynamically unstable donors, non-heart-beating donors and donors with markers of prior hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. A large number (up to 93.8%) of liver transplant seronegative recipients from anti-HBc antibody positive donors have acquired HBsAg after liver transplantation in the absence of immunoprophylaxis. Based on experience in liver transplantation programs, transmission of HBV from donors without HBsAg but with antibody to HBV core antigen (anti-HBc), although conventionally defined as evidence of resolved infection, can have adverse consequences on both graft and recipient. On the contrary, HBV appears to be in-frequently transmitted from HBsAg negative/anti-HBcAb positive kidney donors: the incidence of de novo HBsAg seropositivity after renal transplantation ranges between 0 and 5.2%. A significantly higher incidence of anti-HBc antibody seroconversion (without developing HBsAg) after renal transplantation with anti-HBc antibody positive donors was seen. However, anti-HBc antibody positive renal allografts should be considered, especially for recipients who have been successfully immunized with HBV vaccine. Prospective long-term studies are in progress to assess the risk of de novo HBV infection (HBsAg seroconversion) in renal transplant recipients who have not been successfully immunized with vaccine against HBV.     

Risk factors for cytomegalovirus reactivation after CD6+ T-cell-depleted allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Recipients of T-cell-depleted (TCD) transplants may be more susceptible to CMV infection as a result of the reduction in transferred T cell immunity. We sought to determine the effect of prior donor and patient CMV exposure on the incidence of CMV infection after TCD allogeneic HSCT. METHODS: We retrospectively examined CMV antigen testing results in all patients who had undergone CD6+ TCD related and unrelated donor allogeneic HSCT at our institution from 1996 to 1999. All 124 patients who had documented donor and recipient CMV serologies pretransplant and had undergone CMV antigen testing before day +100 posttransplant were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Forty-one percent of seropositive recipients and 1% of seronegative recipients developed evidence of CMV reactivation (odds ratio 54.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.9-424.1, P<0.001). Prior donor CMV exposure did not place seronegative recipients at increased risk of CMV conversion. Multivariable analysis indicated that prior donor CMV exposure significantly reduced the risk of CMV reactivation in seropositive recipients by 81% (odds ratio 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.91, P=0.04). Grades II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was associated with CMV conversion (P=0.04) when seropositive recipients underwent HSCT from CMV-negative donors, but not when the donor was CMV-seropositive (P=0.54). CONCLUSIONS: The CMV serology status of the recipient, rather than the donor, was the primary determinant of risk for CMV conversion after TCD allogeneic HSCT. Despite CD6+ T-cell depletion, immunity against CMV seemed to be transferred with the donor graft and protected seropositive HSCT recipients from CMV reactivation.     

Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: an approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors

BACKGROUND: Availability of cadaveric kidneys for transplantation is far below the growing need, leading to longer waiting time and more deaths while waiting. METHODS: Using national data from 1995 to 2000, we evaluated graft survival by donor characteristics and the rate of discard of retrieved organs, with the goal of increasing use of kidneys that are associated with increased risk of graft failure, that is, expanded donor kidneys. RESULTS: Cox models identified four donor factors that independently predicted significantly higher relative risk of graft loss compared with a low-risk group. These factors included donor age, cerebrovascular accident as the cause of death, renal insufficiency (serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL), and history of hypertension. Expanded donor kidneys were defined as those with relative risk of graft loss greater than 1.70 and included all donors aged 60 years and older and those aged 50 to 59 years with at least two of the other three conditions (cerebrovascular cause of death, renal insufficiency, hypertension). The expanded donor group accounted for 14.8% of transplanted kidneys. Among organs procured from expanded donors, 38% were discarded versus 9% for all other kidneys. The risk of graft loss of expanded donor kidneys was increased in both older and younger recipients but to a greater extent in those recipients older than 50 years. CONCLUSION: By identifying donor factors associated with graft failure, these analyses may help to expand the number of transplanted kidneys by increasing the utilization of retrieved cadaveric kidneys.     

Transplanting kidneys from CMV-seropositive donors to CMV-seronegative recipients is not associated with poorer renal allograft function or survival.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative recipients of renal allografts from CMV-seropositive donors (D+/R-) have a higher rate of acute rejection than other renal transplant recipients. A relationship between CMV infection/disease and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) has been proposed from animal studies, although human studies have been inconclusive. The objective of this study was to determine if CMV seromatching has an effect on renal allograft function and allograft survival. METHODS: A retrospective single centre study was carried out in 333 first cadaveric transplant recipients from January 1, 1991 to December 31, 1997. The primary end-point was creatinine clearance at 3 years post-transplant in groups based on CMV seromatching. The secondary end-point was renal allograft survival. RESULTS: Mean creatinine clearance 3 years post-transplant was 53.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 of body surface area. There was no significant difference in the mean creatinine clearance for groups formed on the basis of CMV seromatching. Delayed graft function and acute rejection were associated with a lower creatinine clearance at 3 years and reduced overall graft survival [hazard ratios 2.35 (1.56-3.54) (P<0.001) and 1.57 (1.0-2.46) (P = 0.046), respectively]. Considering the end-point of graft loss due to acute rejection (censoring for death with a functioning graft) identified the D+/R- group as having an increased hazard of graft loss due to acute rejection [hazard ratio 3.12 (1.16-8.57) (P = 0.024)]. CONCLUSIONS: The D+/R- group does not appear to have poorer renal allograft function 3 years post-transplant. This group does, however, have an increased risk of early allograft loss due to acute rejection.     

Determinants of Cardiovascular Mortality After Renal Transplantation: A Role For Cytomegalovirus?

Death with a functioning graft (DWF) is now the most common cause of late renal transplant failure, with cardiovascular disease its most frequent etiology. In some populations, infection with cytomegalovirus (CMV) increases risk of coronary disease. Few data exist regarding CMV and cardiovascular mortality after renal transplantation. We reviewed charts of 158 adult patients who died more than 90 days after receiving renal allografts and a matched cohort of 143 (of 2398) surviving patients transplanted at the University of Alabama at Birmingham between 1990 and 1998. Only advancing donor and recipient age increased risk of DWF; CMV infection did not. However, of 50 patients who died of cardiovascular causes, 94% were seropositive for CMV, while only 74% of the other 108 deaths occurred in CMV-seropositive patients (p < 0.05). Risk of cardiovascular death was greatest (p < 0.05) in patients with diabetes, advancing age, and CMV seropositivity. In renal transplant recipients, infection with CMV increases risk of death as a result of cardiovascular causes.     

Patient and graft outcomes from deceased kidney donors age 70 years and older: an analysis of the Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United Network of Organ Sharing database

BACKGROUND: The organ shortage has resulted in more use of older deceased donor kidneys. Data are limited on the impact of donor aged 70 years and older on transplant outcomes. We examined patient and graft outcomes of renal transplant from expanded criteria donors (ECDs) aged 70 years and older, using the Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United Network of Organ Sharing database. METHODS: We identified 601 deceased donor transplants from donors older than 70 years from 2000 to 2005. The follow-up time was until May 2007. Allograft and patient survival were compared between recipients of transplants from older ECDs (age > or =70) and younger ECDs (age 50-69). The relative risk of graft loss and patient death were determined using multivariate models. RESULTS: The adjusted relative risks of overall graft loss (hazards ratio [HR] 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-1.58), death-censored graft loss (HR 1.32; 95% CI 1.09-1.61), and patient death (HR 1.37; 95% CI 1.15-1.64) were greater among recipients of transplants from older ECD kidneys. The relative risk of patient death was lower when older ECD kidneys were transplanted into recipients older than 60 compared with recipients aged 41 to 60. In contrast, the relative risk of death-censored graft loss was not increased when older ECD kidneys were transplanted into recipients older than 60. CONCLUSIONS: Transplants from older ECD kidneys are associated with a higher risk of graft loss and patient death. The risk was highest when older ECD kidneys were transplanted into recipients younger than 60 years.     

Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis with intravenous polyvalent immunoglobulin in high-risk renal transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) seronegative renal allograft recipients (R-), particularly those with a graft from a CMV-seropositive donor (D+), are at high risk for primary CMV infection. CMV resistance to antiviral oral therapy is an emerging problem in renal transplantation, prompting development of new prophylactic strategies. We retrospectively studied the 1-year posttransplantation incidence of CMV infection in high-risk renal transplant recipients, in whom polyvalent intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) were used as prophylaxis. Forty R- patients received immunoprophylaxis by polyvalent IVIg (0.25 g/kg weekly for 8 weeks, starting on the operative day). CMV serological tests remained negative in eight patients (20%). Eight patients (20%) had asymptomatic CMV infection while 24 (60%) developed CMV syndrome and were treated with gancyclovir (10 mg/kg/day intravenously for 3 weeks). None had CMV disease or opportunistic infection. Six patients (15%) had biopsy-proven acute rejection, which followed CMV syndrome in three cases. One-year renal allograft and patient survivals were 95% and 97.5%, respectively. Mean serum creatinine level was 124 +/- 33 micromol/L at 1 year. Clinical tolerance of IVIg was excellent, without any episode of acute renal failure. Polyvalent IVIg provides effective prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients at high risk for CMV infection and is associated with excellent 1-year allograft survival. Because of their immunomodulatory functions, IVIg may have a beneficial effect on the incidence of acute and chronic rejection and allograft survival. A randomized prospective study is required to evaluate long-term effects of CMV prophylaxis with polyvalent IVIg compared to antiviral agents in renal transplant recipients.     

Transplantation of Kidneys from Deceased Adult Polycystic Donors

Renal transplantation is the best treatment for end-stage renal disease. The discrepancy between donor organ supply and demand continues to widen. Maximum efforts should be made to make use of donor kidneys and we suggest that polycystic kidneys can be suitable marginal donor organs. Five polycystic cadaveric donor kidneys were transplanted in four recipients at our institution between year 2000 and 2004. The donor kidneys were either of normal size or moderately enlarged (less than 15 x 10 cm). Donor ages were 24, 46 and 55 years. All donors had normal serum creatinine at the time of organ retrieval. Recipients gave informed consent to be transplanted with the polycystic kidneys. Three of four recipients had primary graft function. The patient with primary nonfunction required graft nephrectomy 8 weeks post-transplantation. One patient died due to cardiovascular causes with a functioning graft 18 months after transplantation. Two patients remain well, 26 and 58 months after transplantation, with normal graft function. Our experience and the limited evidence from the literature suggest that, with careful selection of both donor and recipient, transplantation of cadaveric polycystic donor kidneys should be considered given the current organ shortage.