The impact of an antireflux procedure on intestinal metaplasia of the cardia.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether antireflux surgery is more effective in producing loss of intestinal metaplasia located only at the gastroesophageal junction than it has been in patients with intestinal metaplasia extending up into the distal esophagus. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Biopsies of a normal appearing gastroesophageal junction will demonstrate cardiac mucosa containing goblet cells--the hallmark of intestinal metaplasia--in 10% to 15% of patients who are evaluated for symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux. The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and cardia is rising faster than any other cancer in America, and most of these cancers are found adjacent to areas of intestinal metaplasia. Antireflux surgery in patients with Barrett's esophagus may provide protection from progression to dysplasia and cancer; however, it does not reliably cause regression of the intestinal metaplasia. Less is known about the potential for intestinal metaplasia limited to the cardia (CIM) to regress. METHODS: Sixty patients with intestinal metaplasia of the esophagus or cardia had antireflux surgery. Patients in the intestinal (CIM) group (n = 15) had no endoscopically visible segment of columnar epithelium. Patients in the Barrett's group (n = 45) had columnar epithelium visible within the esophagus. Median follow-up was 25 months in each group. RESULTS: Postoperative biopsies showed complete loss of intestinal metaplasia in 73% of the patients with CIM compared with 4.4% of the patients with Barrett's. Low-grade dysplasia, present in 10 patients preoperatively, regressed in 7 patients (70%). No patient progressed to high-grade dysplasia or cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Loss of intestinal metaplasia after antireflux surgery is rare in patients with Barrett's, but occurred in most patients with CIM. This suggests that cardiac epithelium is dynamic and that microscopic areas of intestinal metaplasia are able to regress much more frequently than longer, visible segments of intestinal metaplasia.     

Barrett's esophagus and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction

Since 1985, 57 patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal (GE) junction have undergone surgical resection. In this group, 16 of the tumors arose in a Barrett's esophagus. There was a significant predilection toward white men above the age of 55 (15/16; 94%) in this subgroup. The mean proximal extent of abnormal columnar involvement was 5.4 cm above the gastroesophageal junction (range 2.5 to 11 cm). The mean location of the neoplasm centered in the distal esophagus 1.8 +/- 0.5 cm above the gastroesophageal junction. During the same time period, 30 patients with Barrett's esophagus were seen without associated adenocarcinoma. There were no statistical differences in the proximal extent of columnar involvement or the presence of reflux symptoms between the two groups. There were no significant differences in age, smoking history, and alcohol consumption between patients with benign or malignant Barrett's esophagus as compared to those with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction not associated with Barrett's mucosa. The marked male predominance seen in the group with malignant Barrett's esophagus was in contrast to the benign cases (16/30; 53%) but was similar to the adenocarcinoma group, without recognized Barrett's esophagus (38/41; 93%). The mean location of the tumor in the latter was 0.9 +/- 1.2 cm above the gastroesophageal junction and was comparable to the location in the group with Barrett's adenocarcinoma. The 4-year survival rate of patients in the non-Barrett's adenocarcinoma group is approximately 30%. Of those with Barrett's adenocarcinoma, the present 4-year survival rate is 60%. The demographic and morphometric similarities between the Barrett's and non-Barrett's adenocarcinoma groups may be of primary importance in determining the true clinical prevalence of Barrett's adenocarcinoma. Our findings suggest that the sensitivity of endoscopic surveillance may be improved if biopsy specimens are concentrated within the distal 3 cm of the esophagus and the esophagogastric junction. Finally, the reason for the current difference in survival between the Barrett's and non-Barrett's adenocarcinoma groups is uncertain but may be related to endoscopic surveillance permitting earlier diagnosis and treatment.     

Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction after bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND: The development of upper gastrointestinal malignancies after bariatric surgery has not been well characterized. Our objective was to review the experience of patients with distal esophageal cancer that was diagnosed after bariatric surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted to identify patients who had undergone bariatric surgery (1999 to 2006) and who later developed high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus. RESULTS: Three patients (of 2,875 [0.1%]) developed esophageal cancer: 2 after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and 1 after vertical banded gastroplasty. All three patients had complaints of reflux, and two were treated with esophagectomy. The third patient presented with invasive carcinoma and died 2 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings emphasize the importance of precise endoscopic evaluation before bariatric surgery in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), of the necessity for continuing postsurgical surveillance in patients with known Barrett's esophagitis, and of early evaluation in patients who develop new symptoms of GERD after bariatric surgery.     

Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and Cardia: A Review of the Disease and Its Treatment

Background Over the past 50 years there has been a remarkable change in the epidemiology of esophageal cancer. Previously rare, adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction is now the most common esophageal cancer, and in the United States the incidence is increasing faster than that of any other malignancy. Surveillance in patients with Barrett’s esophagus is identifying adenocarcinoma at an earlier, more curable stage in many patients, and at the same time new endoscopic and surgical options are available for the therapy of these localized tumors. Methods This article is a review of the epidemiology, diagnosis, staging, and treatment options for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Results The epidemiology, prognosis, patterns of lymphatic metastasis, and survival for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma suggest that these tumors are similar. New options for therapy, as well as the results of surgical resection with and without chemoradiotherapy, are reviewed. Conclusions Surveillance programs for Barrett’s are identifying patients with early, curable adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Therapy for more advanced tumors hinges on local control of the disease and the eradication of systemic metastases.     

Inflammation and specialized intestinal metaplasia of cardiac mucosa is a manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to test the hypothesis that cardiac mucosa, carditis, and specialized intestinal metaplasia at an endoscopically normal-appearing cardia are manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: In the absence of esophageal mucosal injury, the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease currently rests on 24-hour pH monitoring. Histologic examination of the esophagus is not useful. The recent identification of specialized intestinal metaplasia at the cardia, along with the observation that it occurs in inflamed cardiac mucosa, led the authors to focus on the type and condition of the mucosa at the gastroesophageal junction and its relation to gastroesophageal reflux disease. METHODS: Three hundred thirty-four consecutive patients with symptoms of foregut disease, no evidence of columnar-lined esophagus, and no history of gastric or esophageal surgery were evaluated by 1) endoscopic biopsies above, at, and below the gastroesophageal junction; 2) esophageal motility; and 3) 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. The patients were divided into groups depending on the histologic presence of cardiac epithelium with and without inflammation or associated intestinal metaplasia. Markers of gastroesophageal reflux disease were compared between groups (i.e., lower esophageal sphincter characteristics, esophageal acid exposure, the presence of endoscopic erosive esophagitis, and hiatal hernia). RESULTS: When cardiac epithelium was found, it was inflamed in 96% of the patients. The presence of cardiac epithelium and carditis was associated with deterioration of lower esophageal sphincter characteristics and increased esophageal acid exposure. Esophagitis occurred more commonly in patients with carditis whose sphincter, on manometry, was structurally defective. Specialized intestinal metaplasia at the cardia was only seen in inflamed cardiac mucosa, and its prevalence increased both with increasing acid exposure and with the presence of esophagitis. CONCLUSION: The findings of cardiac mucosa, carditis, and intestinal metaplasia in an endoscopically normal-appearing gastroesophageal junction are histologic indicators of gastroesophageal reflux disease. These findings may be among the earliest signs of gastroesophageal reflux and contribute to the authors understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease process.     

Laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms better predict the presence of esophageal adenocarcinoma than typical gastroesophageal reflux symptoms

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the presence of laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms is associated with the presence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). BACKGROUND: Most patients diagnosed with EAC have incurable disease at the time of detection. The majority of these patients are unaware of the presence of Barrett's esophagus prior to cancer diagnosis and many do not report typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This suggests that the current GERD symptom-based screening paradigm may be inadequate. Data support a causal relation between complicated GERD and laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms. We theorize that laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms are not recognized expeditiously, resulting in chronic esophageal injury and an unrecognized progression of Barrett's esophagus to EAC. METHODS: This is a case-comparison (control) study. Cases were patients diagnosed with EAC (n = 63) between 1997 and 2002. Three comparison groups were selected: 1) Barrett's esophagus patients without dysplasia (n = 50), 2) GERD patients without Barrett's esophagus (n = 50), and 3) patients with no history of GERD symptoms or antisecretory medication use (n = 56). The risk factors evaluated included demographics, medical history, lifestyle variables, and laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms. Typical GERD symptoms and antisecretory medication use were recorded. Multivariate analysis of demographics, comorbid risk factors, and symptoms was performed with logistic regression to provide odds ratios for the probability of EAC diagnosis. RESULTS: The prevalence of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms was significantly greater in the cases than comparison groups (P = 0.0005). The prevalence of laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms increased as disease severity progressed from the non-GERD comparison group (19.6%) to GERD (26%), Barrett's esophagus (40%), and EAC patients (54%). Symptoms of GERD were less prevalent in cases (43%) when compared with Barrett's esophagus (66%) and GERD (86%) control groups (P < 0.001). Twenty-seven percent (17 of 63) of EAC patients never had GERD or laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms. Fifty-seven percent of EAC patients presented without ever having typical GERD symptoms. Chronic cough, diabetes, and age emerged as independent risk factors for the development of EAC. CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux are more prevalent in patients with EAC than typical GERD symptoms and may represent the only sign of disease. Chronic cough is an independent risk factor associated with the presence of EAC. Addition of laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms to the current Barrett's screening guidelines is warranted.     

Adenocarcinomas of the distal esophagus and "gastric cardia" are predominantly esophageal carcinomas

BACKGROUND: Adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and gastric cardia are defined by the relationship of its epicenter to the gastro-esophageal junction, which is presently defined as the end of the tubular esophagus. We have recently suggested that the true gastro-esophageal junction is best defined by the proximal limit of gastric oxyntic mucosa. AIM: To reclassify adenocarcinomas of this region by the relationship of the tumor to the proximal limit of gastric oxyntic mucosa. METHODS: Seventy-four patients who had esophago-gastrectomy for adenocarcinomas in this region were classified as adenocarcinoma of distal esophagus (38 patients) and gastric cardia (36 patients) by present criteria. The epithelial type at the epicenter and distal edge of these tumors was assessed. RESULTS: The epicenter of the tumor in 64 patients with noncircumferential tumors had squamous (5 cases), cardiac (21 cases), oxynto-cardiac (4 cases), and intestinal (Barrett-type) (34 cases) epithelia. None had gastric oxyntic mucosa. Of the 10 patients with circumferential tumors, 7 had cardiac or oxynto-cardiac epithelium at the distal tumor edge. CONCLUSIONS: If the gastro-esophageal junction is defined histologically as the proximal limit of oxyntic mucosa, 71/74 patients would be classified as adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus. The other 3 patients were questionable as to gastric or esophageal origin. We suggest that this reclassification based on the proposed new definition of the gastro-esophageal junction provides an explanation for the epidemiologic relationship that exists between adenocarcinoma of the "gastric cardia" and gastro-esophageal reflux disease.     

Anatomic dilatation of the cardia and competence of the lower esophageal sphincter: A clinical and experimental study

Anatomic and clinical data suggest that the gastroesophageal junction or cardia in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may be dilated. We hypothesized that anatomic dilatation of the cardia induces a lower esophageal sphincter dysfunction that may be corrected by narrowing the gastroesophageal junction (i.e., calibration of the cardia). We measured the perimeter of the cardia during surgery in control subjects and patients with GERD and Barrett’s esophagus. We then tested our hypothesis in a mechanical model. The model was based on a pig gastroesophageal specimen with perpendicularly placed elastic bands around the cardia simulating the action of the “sling” and “clasp” fibers. “Dilatation” of the cardia was induced by displacing the sling band laterally and decreasing its tension. “Calibration” of the cardia was performed by reapproximation of the sling band toward the esophagus but maintaining the same tension as the dilated model. In the “basal,” “dilated,” and “calibrated” states, the perimeter of the cardia was noted and rapid mechanized pullback manometry with a water-perfused catheter was performed. The opening pressure was determined, and three-dimensional sphincter pressure images were analyzed. The average cardia perimeter was 6.3 cm in control subjects, 8.9 cm in GERD patients, and 13.8 cm in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. The arrangement of the bands in the experimental model generated a manometric high-pressure zone similar to that in the human lower esophageal sphincter. Dilatation of the cardia resulted in a decrease in the resting pressure, length, and vector volume of the high-pressure zone, and reduced the opening pressure. Calibration restored the resting and opening pressure, and normalized the three-dimensional pressure image. In patients with GERD and Barrett’s esophagus, the cardia is dilated. Our model supports the hypothesis that lower esophageal sphincter function is compromised by anatomic dilatation of the cardia and can be restored by approximarion of the “sling” fibers toward the lesser curvature (“clasp” fibers). This provides evidence for a correlation between gastroesophageal sphincter dysfunction in reflux disease and its correction by antireflux surgery.     

The relationship between gastroesophageal reflux, intestinal metaplasia and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus

Currently available data indicate a clear and probably causal relationship between long-lasting gastroesophageal reflux disease, the development of long segments with specialized intestinal metaplasia in the distal esophagus and subsequent progression to adenocarcinoma. To a lesser degree, this also appears to be the case for short segments of specialized intestinal metaplasia in the distal esophagus. In contrast, epidemiological data and classic parameters for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease do not currently support a causal role of gastroesophageal reflux in the pathogenesis of specialized intestinal metaplasia at the gastric cardia. Despite its high prevalence and malignant potential, many questions about the prevention and management of intestinal metaplasia in the distal esophagus remain unsolved. In patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux, current modes of medical therapy do not appear to prevent the development of intestinal metaplasia, while effective anti-reflux surgery seems to have a protective effect. Formal studies with adequate follow-up are, however, still lacking. Neither acid-suppression therapy nor anti-reflux surgery, with or without mucosal ablation, can reliably prevent the malignant degeneration of established intestinal metaplasia of the esophagus. Close endoscopic surveillance with extensive biopsies, therefore, remains mandatory in such patients, irrespective of the treatment modality.     

Helicobacter pylori is not associated with the manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

HYPOTHESIS: Helicobacter pylori is not associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications, including adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: University tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Two hundred twenty-nine patients with symptoms suggestive of foregut disease underwent esophageal manometry, 24-hour pH monitoring, and upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy, with biopsy specimens obtained from the gastric antrum, the GEJ, and the distal esophagus. In these and in an additional 114 patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and the GEJ, the presence of H. pylori was determined by Giemsa stain. The presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease, defined by abnormal esophageal acid exposure, and its manifestations (carditis, erosive esophagitis, intestinal metaplasia limited to the GEJ, Barrett esophagus, and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and GEJ) were correlated with the presence of H. pylori. RESULTS: Helicobacter pylori was found on the biopsy specimens of the gastric antrum in 14.0% (32/229) of the patients with benign disease. It was not related to the features of gastroesophageal reflux disease, including abnormal esophageal acid exposure, erosive esophagitis, or Barrett esophagus. The presence of inflamed cardiac mucosa at the GEJ or carditis was inversely related to H. pylori infection and strongly associated with increased esophageal acid exposure. There was no association between the presence of intestinal metaplasia and H. pylori infection. Helicobacter pylori was found in 22 (19.3%) of the 114 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma, which was not different from the prevalence of H. pylori in patients with benign disease. CONCLUSION: Helicobacter pylori plays no role in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease or its complications.     

Columnar mucosa and intestinal metaplasia of the esophagus: fifty years of controversy

OBJECTIVE: To outline current concepts regarding etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of intestinal metaplasia of the esophagus and cardia. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Previously, endoscopic visualization of columnar mucosa extending a minimum of 3 cm into the esophagus was sufficient for the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus, but subsequently the importance of intestinal metaplasia and the premalignant nature of Barrett's have been recognized. It is now apparent that shorter lengths of intestinal metaplasia are common, and share many features of traditional 3-cm Barrett's esophagus. METHODS: Themes and concepts pertaining to intestinal metaplasia of the esophagus and cardia are developed based on a review of the literature published between 1950 and 1999. RESULTS: Cardiac mucosa is the precursor of intestinal metaplasia of the esophagus. Both develop as a consequence of gastroesophageal reflux. Intestinal metaplasia, even a short length, is premalignant, and the presence of dysplasia indicates progression on the pathway to adenocarcinoma. Antireflux surgery, as opposed to medical therapy, may induce regression or halt progression of intestinal metaplasia. The presence of high-grade dysplasia is frequently associated with an unrecognized focus of adenocarcinoma. Vagal-sparing esophagectomy removes the diseased esophagus and is curative in patients with high-grade dysplasia. Invasion beyond the mucosa is associated with a high likelihood of lymph node metastases and requires lymphadenectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Despite improved understanding of this disease, controversy about the definition and best treatment of Barrett's esophagus continues, but new molecular insights, coupled with careful patient follow-up, should further enhance knowledge of this disease.     

Clinical significance of p53 mutations in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and cardia

OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency and spectrum of p53 gene mutations in adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and cardia and to compare clinical and pathologic features in patients with p53 mutant and nonmutant cancers. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The p53 gene is commonly mutated in human cancers, and a p53 mutation is reported to be present in more than 50% of esophageal adenocarcinomas. Although many studies have investigated the frequency of p53 protein overexpression in adenocarcinomas of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction, few studies have assessed the frequency and clinical significance of p53 mutations in these tumors. In particular, the prognostic importance of p53 mutation is uncertain. Adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and cardia share many epidemiologic and pathologic features, but it is controversial whether they represent the same tumor. A comparison of the frequency and spectrum of mutations in adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and cardia would test whether these tumors are also similar at the molecular level. METHODS: DNA was isolated from microdissected paraffin-embedded tumor tissues of patients who underwent esophagogastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (n = 19), cardia (esophagogastric junction, n = 12), or subcardia (n = 6). Exons 5 to 8 of the p53 gene were analyzed for the presence of mutations using the polymerase chain reaction with single-strand conformation polymorphism and DNA sequencing of bands showing abnormal mobility. The presence of mutation was confirmed by selective hybridization of a mutant-specific oligonucleotide to DNA isolated from the tumor. RESULTS: p53 mutations were identified in 18 of 37 (48.6%) tumors. Patients with p53 mutant tumors were significantly younger and had a significantly poorer prognosis. There was a similar prevalence of p53 mutations in adenocarcinomas of the esophagus (53%) and cardia (58%). In contrast, mutations were relatively uncommon in subcardia adenocarcinomas (one mutant tumor [17%]). The types of mutations found in the esophageal and the cardia cancers were also similar. CONCLUSIONS: Adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and cardia have a similar frequency and spectrum of p53 gene mutations, suggesting that these tumors have a common pathogenesis. Patients with mutations are younger, have signs of more advanced disease, and have a poorer prognosis than patients without mutations.     

Gastroesophageal reflux and cancer

The causal relationship between GERD and esophageal adenocarcinoma, although unclear just a few decades ago, now is established fairly well. The physiologic changes and the biocellular alterations of the damaged esophageal mucosa are documented better. Despite this knowledge, the dramatic increase in the incidence of esophageal cancer cannot be explained. The absolute risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma arising from GERD is low, and, at present, does not justify population-screening programs. Still, with the notion that adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is an aggressive cancer once documented, important questions still are in need of answers for patients suffering from reflux symptoms. Patients who have reflux disease are not necessarily symptomatic. It remains unclear if patients experiencing reflux symptoms should undergo mandatory endoscopy with biopsies at the esophagogastric junction. Furthermore, metaplasia of the lower esophagus often is not readily recognizable at endoscopy, and only biopsies can document abnormal histology. A severe and prolonged history of reflux always should orient to the possibility of a reflux-related columnar-lined esophagus. Once documented, Barrett's esophagus needs to be seen as a premalignant condition not necessarily leading to adenocarcinoma formation; despite their increased risk of tumor formation, most patients who have Barrett's esophagus die of other causes. During regular endoscopic follow-up, multilevel circumferential biopsies should document the evolution of the histologic changes in the lower esophagus and at the gastroesophageal junction of these patients. It is the only method available to document the appearance of dysplasia. It still is unclear if medicine or surgery provides the best quality of life and the best protection against the development of dysplasia and the possible progression toward adenocarcinoma formation when intestinal metaplasia is present in the esophagus.     

The dilated distal esophagus: a new entity that is the pathologic basis of early gastroesophageal reflux disease

Present management algorithms for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) limit endoscopy to patients with advanced disease. When endoscopy is performed, biopsy is limited to patients who have a visible columnar-lined esophagus. Biopsy is not recommended for patients whose endoscopy is normal. This algorithm results in the failure to evaluate patients with early stages of GERD at a pathologic level. We report 714 patients with normal endoscopic findings irrespective of symptoms who had adequate biopsies taken from the squamocolumnar junction and the area 1-cm distal to this from mucosa that had rugal folds. Concurrent biopsies were also taken from the gastric body and/or antrum. All patients had a gap between their esophageal squamous epithelium and gastric oxyntic mucosa in the junctional region composed of oxyntocardiac ± cardiac ± intestinal epithelia. A total of 643 (90.1%) patients had no significant pathology in the gastric antrum and/or body, indicating that the squamooxyntic gap was an isolated abnormality in this region in all but 71 (9.9%) patients. The gap contained only oxyntocardiac epithelium in 71 (9.9%) patients, cardiac mucosa without intestinal metaplasia in 482 (67.5%) patients, and intestinal metaplasia in 161 (22.6%) patients. The pathologic interpretation of biopsies taken from the gastroesophageal junction is confusing and has significant interobserver variation. This results from lack of agreement as to whether these biopsies originate in the proximal stomach ("gastric cardia") or in the esophagus. We provide evidence that the presence of oxyntocardiac ± cardiac ± intestinal epithelia in biopsies from patients who are endoscopically normal is diagnostic of a dilated GERD-damaged distal esophagus. The dilated distal esophagus is the pathologic manifestation of destruction of the abdominal segment of the lower esophageal sphincter. Its presence is the pathologic basis of early GERD, which is missed if patients who are endoscopically normal are not biopsied, as is the present recommendation. Its recognition allows for accurate and evidence-based interpretation of biopsies from this region and removes the present confusion and permits the development of a reproducible pathologic diagnostic method.     

Symptoms, acid exposure and motility in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

INTRODUCTION: Barrett's esophagus, a syndrome in which the squamous mucosa that normally lines the distal esophagus is replaced with columnar epithelium, is found in a small percentage of patients presenting with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The columnar epithelium may be protective, guarding people afflicted with Barrett's esophagus from experiencing symptoms related to acid reflux. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether people with Barrett's esophagus subjectively experience fewer symptoms or symptoms of decreased severity, despite sustaining greater acid exposure, than those with GERD but without Barrett's syndrome. METHODS: We conducted a chart review of patients with GERD. Criteria for inclusion in the study were esophagogastroscopy, motility testing and a 24-hour pH study. Fifty-eight patients (29 men, 29 women) fulfilled these criteria. The diagnosis of GERD was based on an abnormal 24-hour pH study (DeMeester score). Of these 58 patients, 21 (14 men, 7 women) were found to have histologically confirmed Barrett's esophagus. A questionnaire to assess the key symptoms of GERD was administered, with a severity score ranging from 0 to 3 (3 being the most severe) for each symptom. RESULTS: Patients with Barrett's esophagus experienced symptoms significantly less severe (p < 0.01) than those with GERD. Patients with Barrett's esophagus also had a greater degree of acid exposure as identified by higher DeMeester scores (p = 0.056), longer episodes of acid exposure, a greater number of long episodes (> 5 min) of acid exposure (p = 0.033) and an increased percentage of time when their pH was less than 4. Patients with Barrett's esophagus had decreased resting lower esophageal sphincter tone, and number and amplitude of peristaltic contractions. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with Barrett's esophagus, the columnar epithelium may serve a protective function in guarding against symptoms of acid reflux. This has implications for the diagnosis and management of this condition.     

Karzinom des ösophagogastralen Übergangs und Barrett-Ösophagus

From a clinical and biological point of view, the term "adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction" (AEG) encompasses several distinct tumor entities. The topographic anatomic classification into adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus (AEG I), true carcinoma of the cardia (AEG II), and subcardiac gastric cancer (AEG III) also reflects differences regarding the pathogenesis of these tumors and is increasingly accepted worldwide. Associated Barrett's esophagus, which usually develops as a consequence of chronic gastroesophageal reflux, can be documented in practically all patients with AEG I tumors and constitutes the most important precancerous lesion. A metaplasia-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence has been confirmed for these tumors. Barrett's esophagus is thus considered a model for studies on carcinogenesis and the prevention of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Its pathogenetic role in AEG II and III tumors must, however, be discussed differently. Our own experience shows that pathogenetic mechanisms similar to those in AEG I tumors may be present in up to 30% of tumors classified as AEG II. The majority of AEG II tumors, however, show morphologic, biologic and pathogenetic similarities with AEG III tumors and proximal gastric cancer.     

Postoperative complications after esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus are related to timing of death due to recurrence

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy is frequently accompanied by substantial complications with secondary disturbance of the immune system. After esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and/or gastroesophageal junction, the majority of patients develops an early recurrence and dies within 2 years. The aim of this study was to determine the relevance of perioperative complications on the timing of death due to recurrence. METHODS: A consecutive series of 351 patients who underwent esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction was reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 351 included patients, 191 patients (54%) died due to recurrence of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Of these 191 patients, 77 (40%), 138 (72%), and 186 patients (97%) died before 12, 24, and 60 months, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that T-stage, lymph node ratio >0.20, the presence of extracapsular lymph node involvement, but not complications were significant factors for the prediction of death due to cancer recurrence. However, in the patients who died, multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that not only the presence of extracapsular lymph node involvement but also the occurrence of complications were significantly related with a shorter time interval until death due to recurrence. CONCLUSION: The relation between perioperative complications and cancer recurrence per se is not causal. However, postoperative complications are independently associated with the early timing of death due to cancer recurrence. A possible explanation for this phenomenon is that immunologic host factors enhance microscopic residual disease to develop more rapidly into clinically manifest recurrence.     

Does Barrett's esophagus impact outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication?

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to compare patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with or without Barrett's esophagus for severity and frequency of symptoms and their response to antireflux surgery. METHODS: Eighty patients with GERD and Barrett's esophagus and 93 concurrent patients with GERD alone, all of whom underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, were compared by using symptom scores graded by a Likert scale. RESULTS: Before fundoplication, patients with Barrett's esophagus had higher DeMeester scores. Symptom scores were not different for patients with versus without Barrett's esophagus before or after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. CONCLUSIONS: Before and after fundoplication, patients with Barrett's esophagus, despite more severe reflux, have symptoms nearly identical in frequency and severity when compared with patients with GERD alone. Regardless of presence of Barrett's, all improve dramatically with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Barrett's esophagus does not impact presentation before or outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.     

Comparison of the clinical and histological characteristics and survival of distal esophageal-gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma in patients with and without barrett mucosa

BACKGROUND: The incidence of adenocarcinoma in the distal esophagus and at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) has been increasing in the last decades. It has been suggested that patients in whom Barrett mucosa can be identified in the surgical specimen have a better prognosis compared with those without. This has led to the belief that patients with and without Barrett mucosa may represent 2 distinct cancer types. HYPOTHESIS: Distal esophageal-GEJ adenocarcinoma with and without Barrett mucosa share the same origin, but differ only in clinical presentation and outcome. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective cohort study in a university tertiary referral center.Patients and METHODS: Between 1992 and 2002, 215 patients (173 men and 42 women; median age, 66 years; age range, 26-91 years) had esophagogastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus-GEJ. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical presentation, tumor characteristics, and survival were compared in patients with Barrett mucosa (n = 140) and those without (n = 75). RESULTS: Patients with Barrett mucosa in the specimen had tumors that were diagnosed earlier; were smaller in size; earlier in stage, with fewer node metastases; and had a better 5-year survival. CONCLUSIONS: Observed differences in survival between patients with distal esophageal-GEJ adenocarcinoma with and without Barrett mucosa can be explained by earlier diagnosis. Patients without Barrett mucosa have their tumors detected later, when the disease is more advanced. This suggests the possibility that tumors without Barrett mucosa are not of a different origin, but rather are larger tumors that may have overgrown areas of Barrett mucosa.     

Retinoic acid receptor-alpha messenger RNA expression is increased and retinoic acid receptor-gamma expression is decreased in Barrett's intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia, adenocarcinoma sequence

BACKGROUND: Expression levels of the retinoic acid receptors (RAR-alpha, RAR-beta, and RAR-gamma) are significantly different in neoplastic tissues compared with non-neoplastic tissues for some tumors. This study investigated whether retinoic acid receptor messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels are altered in Barrett's esophagus and Barrett's adenocarcinoma tissues. METHODS: Relative mRNA expression levels of the RARs were quantified by using the ABI 7700 Sequence Detector (Taqman) system in Barrett's intestinal metaplasia (n = 15), dysplasia (n = 6), adenocarcinoma (n = 17), and matching normal esophagus tissues (n = 36). RESULTS: RAR-alpha expression was significantly increased, and RAR-gamma expression was significantly decreased, at higher stages in the Barrett's sequence. There was almost complete loss of RAR-gamma expression (relative expression level < or = 1) in a majority (70%) of the dysplasia and adenocarcinoma tissues. There were significant differences in RAR-alpha and RAR-gamma expression in histopathologically normal tissues in patients with cancer versus patients without cancer. RAR-beta expression levels were significantly elevated in adenocarcinoma versus normal esophagus tissues. The RAR expression profile was similar for cancers arising within the esophagus and for cancers arising at the gastroesophageal junction. CONCLUSIONS: RAR mRNA expression levels are significantly different in Barrett's tissues compared with normal esophagus tissues, and these levels are significantly different in Barrett's dysplasia and adenocarcinoma tissues compared with nondysplastic tissues. These results suggest that RAR mRNA levels may be useful biomarkers for this disease and that gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas are genetically similar to esophageal adenocarcinomas. These results also suggest that a cancer field is present in the esophagus in patients with cancer and that genetic alterations can precede histopathologic alterations in this disease.