Resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: is survival dependent on who is available at the scene?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is influenced by the on-scene availability of different grades of ambulance personnel and other health professionals. DESIGN: Population based, retrospective, observational study. SETTING: County of Nottinghamshire with a population of one million. SUBJECTS: All 2094 patients who had resuscitation attempted by Nottinghamshire Ambulance Service crew from 1991 to 1994; study of 1547 patients whose arrest were of cardiac aetiology. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival to hospital admission and survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS: Overall survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest remains poor: 221 patients (14.3%) survived to reach hospital alive and only 94 (6.1%) survived to be discharged from hospital. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the chances of those resuscitated by technician crew reaching hospital alive were poor but were greater when paramedic crew were either called to assist technicians or dealt with the arrest themselves (odds ratio 6.9 (95% confidence interval 3.92 to 26.61)). Compared to technician crew, survival to hospital discharge was only significantly improved with paramedic crew (3.55 (1.62 to 7.79)) and further improved when paramedics were assisted by either a health professional (9.91 (3.12 to 26.61)) or a medical practitioner (20.88 (6.72 to 64.94)). CONCLUSIONS: Survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest remains poor despite attendance at the scene of the arrest by ambulance crew and other health professionals. Patients resuscitated by a paramedic from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest caused by cardiac disease were more likely to survive to hospital discharge than when resuscitation was provided by an ambulance technician. Resuscitation by a paramedic assisted by a medical practitioner offers a patient the best chances of surviving the event.     

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survival: an epidemiological analysis of emergency service reports in a large city in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The factors that influence survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Japan have not been fully investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS: The official emergency service record was used to investigate 1,600 patients for whom cardiopulmonary resuscitation was attempted by the city's emergency personnel. Only 45 (2.8%) patients survived for 1 month. The survival rate was 9.8% in the patients under 20 years of age, with a marked decreasing trend to 0.8% in the patients aged 80 years or older. The rate peaked at 4.8% on Sunday and bottomed out at 0.5% on Thursday, forming a distinct sine curve. The survival rate was 9.9% when an ambulance arrived at the scene within 4 min, with a steep drop to 2.5% when 4-7 min elapsed. However, the rate was not significantly different by the interval to hospital. Although bystander resuscitation did not significantly affect the survival, paramedics on board significantly improved the rate (3.5% vs 1.6%). Multivariate analysis confirmed that age, day of the week, place, interval to ambulance's arrival, and personnel on board were independently associated with the probability of survival. CONCLUSIONS: Quick arrival of a paramedic team would improve the survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. General education of lifesaving techniques would be another key factor.     

A comparison between patients suffering in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in terms of treatment and outcome

Abstract. Herlitz J, Bång A, Ekström L, Aune S, Lundström G, Holmberg S, Holmberg M, Lindqvist J (Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden). A comparison between patients suffering in‐hospital and out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest in terms of treatment and outcome. J Intern Med 2000; 248: 53–60. Aim. To compare treatment and outcome amongst patients suffering in‐hospital and out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest in the same community. Patients. All patients suffering in‐hospital cardiac arrest in Sahlgrenska University Hospital covering half the catchment area of the community of Göteborg (500 000 inhabitants) and all patients suffering out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest in the community of Göteborg. Criteria for inclusion were that resuscitation efforts should have been attempted. Time of survey. From 1 November 1994 to 1 November 1997. Methods. Data were recorded both prospectively and retrospectively. Results. In total, 422 patients suffered in‐hospital cardiac arrest and 778 patients suffered out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. Patients with in‐hospital cardiac arrest included more women and were more frequently found in ventricular fibrillation. The median interval between collapse and defibrillation was 2 min in in‐hospital cardiac arrest compared with 7 min in out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest (< 0.001). The proportion of patients being discharged from hospital was 37.5% after in‐hospital cardiac arrest, compared with 8.7% after out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest (P < 0.001). Corresponding figures for patients found in ventricular fibrillation were 56.9 vs. 19.7% (P < 0.001) and for patients found in asystole 25.2 vs. 1.8% (P < 0.001). Conclusion. In a survey evaluating patients with in‐hospital and out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest in whom resuscitation efforts were attempted, we found that the former group had a survival rate more than four times higher than the latter. Possible strong contributing factors to this observation are: (i) shorter time interval to start of treatment, and (ii) a prepared selection for resuscitation efforts.     

Management of ventricular dysrhythmias in the prehospital and emergency department setting

Each year approximately 1,500,000 people experience acute myocardial infarction. About 40% of them die, half before they reach the hospital. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is a major cause of cardiac arrest, and delay in administering antiarrhythmic agents contributes to the incidence of out-of-hospital deaths. The 3 antiarrhythmic drugs currently used by paramedics for cardiac arrest are bretylium, lidocaine, and procainamide. The early use of bretylium tosylate is stressed in Advanced Cardiac Life Support protocols because of the agent's antifibrillatory properties, that is, its ability to increase the VF threshold and to block reentry. Evidence indicates that early, aggressive use of bretylium tosylate as a first-line agent improves the likelihood of successful resuscitation. Preliminary data are presented from an ongoing comparative study of prehospital use of bretylium tosylate and lidocaine for VF. One hundred seventeen cardiac arrests have occurred, 55 of which were associated with VF and are included in the study. Resuscitation was not attempted in 3 of the 55 patients at the request of the family and physician. Of the remaining 52 patients, 17 received bretylium tosylate plus lidocaine, 12 lidocaine alone, and 7 only bretylium tosylate. There were 16 patients who did not receive medications. According to the study protocol, the choice of antiarrhythmic agents was determined by the paramedic shift during which arrest occurred. Of the 52 patients treated, 16 (30%) survived. It is too soon to draw any conclusions.     

Heartstart Scotland: the use of paramedic skills in out of hospital resuscitation

Objective—To assess the frequency with which paramedic skills were used in out of hospital cardiac arrest and the effect of tracheal intubation on outcome.
Design—Retrospective analysis of ambulance service reports and hospital records.
Setting—Scottish Ambulance Service and hospitals admitting acute patients throughout Scotland.
Results—A total of 8651 out of hospital resuscitation attempts were recorded and tracheal intubation was attempted in 3427 (39.6%) arrests. One hundred and thirty six patients (3.7%) were intubated and 476 (9.1%) of the patients who were not intubated survived to hospital discharge (p < 0.001). Among the patients who were defibrillated the proportion intubated was highest in the patients who received the greatest number of shocks (p < 0.01). Among subjects receiving similar numbers of shocks survival rates were lower for intubated patients (p < 0.01). Patients with unwitnessed arrests were most frequently intubated and survival rates were lowest in this group.
Conclusions—Patients who are intubated seem to have lower survival rates. This may however reflect the difficulty of the resuscitation attempt rather than the effects of intubation. The use of basic life support skills rapidly after cardiac arrest is associated with the best survival rates.

Keywords: paramedics;  resuscitation;  myocardial infarction;  tracheal intubation;  prehospital care     

Considerations for improving survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Since the implementation of a paramedic system in Seattle, yearly survival rates from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation have averaged 25% without any significant increase over the years. Outcome for cardiac arrest associated with other rhythms has been poor: when asystole was the first rhythm recorded, only 1% of patients survived; when electromechanical dissociation was initially present, only 6% survived. For cases of electromechanical dissociation, neither the type of rhythm nor the rate appear to influence outcome. Survival from ventricular fibrillation can be improved by shortening the delay to initiation of CPR and to defibrillation. When outcome in 244 witnessed arrests was related to the times to beginning CPR and to initial defibrillation, mortality increased 3% each minute until CPR was begun and 4% a minute until the first shock was delivered. New strategies that minimize delays appear to have the greatest promise for improving survival after cardiac arrest.     

The limited potential of special ambulance services in the management of cardiac arrest.

For six months a survey was made of all the patients in the Nottingham District Health Authority who died or who were brought to hospital after a cardiac arrest outside hospital. During this period just under half of the emergency ambulance shifts were covered by specially trained crews with defibrillators. During the study period the ICD coding of death certificates indicated that 894 (25%) of the 3575 deaths were due to ischaemic heart disease. During this period the ambulance service received 17,749 emergency calls, which included 445 patients who had cardiac arrests outside hospital. One hundred and forty seven of these patients were carried by ambulances equipped with defibrillators and resuscitation was attempted in 83. Seven patients survived to leave hospital. The special ambulance service was cost effective--a simple calculation suggests that the cost per life saved was approximately 2600 pounds, but it seems unlikely that special ambulance services will materially affect community fatality rates from ischaemic heart disease.     

The limited potential of special ambulance services in the management of cardiac arrest

For six months a survey was made of all the patients in the Nottingham District Health Authority who died or who were brought to hospital after a cardiac arrest outside hospital. During this period just under half of the emergency ambulance shifts were covered by specially trained crews with defibrillators. During the study period the ICD coding of death certificates indicated that 894 (25%) of the 3575 deaths were due to ischaemic heart disease. During this period the ambulance service received 17,749 emergency calls, which included 445 patients who had cardiac arrests outside hospital. One hundred and forty seven of these patients were carried by ambulances equipped with defibrillators and resuscitation was attempted in 83. Seven patients survived to leave hospital. The special ambulance service was cost effective--a simple calculation suggests that the cost per life saved was approximately 2600 pounds, but it seems unlikely that special ambulance services will materially affect community fatality rates from ischaemic heart disease.     

Outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation efforts in a Greek tertiary hospital

Abstract

Introduction: In-hospital cardiac arrest is a leading cause of death and despite recent advances in cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the survival to hospital discharge is poor. The aim of our study was to evaluate the success of resuscitation efforts in a tertiary hospital.

Patients and Methods: We retrospectively collected and analysed data on all patients in whom cardiopulmonary resuscitation was attempted after in-hospital cardiac arrest in one-year period.

Results: 96 cardiac arrest victims were studied. Sustained return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in 15 (15.6%) patients, while all of them survived for 24 h. Training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation, initiation of resuscitation efforts in less than 5 min, and intubation time < 1 min after team arrival were predictive factors associated with restoration of spontaneous circulation. Non-certified residents resuscitated 87 (90.6%) patients with 6 (6.8%) of them achieving return of spontaneous circulation and surviving for 24 h. On the contrary, certified ward residents resuscitated nine (9.3%) patients with 100% immediate and 24-h survival.

Conclusion: In our hospital, certified providers had remarkably higher successful resuscitation rates for in-hospital cardiac arrest than non-certified providers. This finding suggests that training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation, continuing medical education, and implementation of the existing legislation will result in increased survival.     

Thrombolysis with Streptokinase During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Single Center Experience and Review of the Literature

Objective: To report our experience with use of thrombolysis with streptokinase during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of patients with cardiac arrest due to myocardial infarction. Design: A case series. Methods: Thrombolytic therapy (streptokinase) was administered during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of 4 patients with suspected myocardial infarction as the cause of cardiac arrest. Results: 3 of the 4 patients survived and were discharged from the hospital without any major complications or neurological sequela. Conclusion: Thrombolysis with streptokinase during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction is associated with reduced mortality and favorable neurological outcome.     

Outcome after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

Patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) often die from right heart failure or sudden cardiac death. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may be instituted in these patients but there are no data in the medical literature about the outcome of CPR in this group of patients. We conducted a retrospective multicenter international study on the frequency and results of CPR in patients with PAH. A total of 3,130 patients with PAH were treated between 1997 and 2000 in 17 referral centers in Europe and in the United States. During this period, 513 patients had circulatory arrest and CPR was attempted in 132 (26%) of these patients. Although 96% of the CPR attempts took place in hospitalized patients (74% in intensive care units or equally equipped facilities) and although there was only minimal delay between collapse and initiation of CPR, resuscitation efforts were primarily unsuccessful in 104 patients (79%). Only eight patients (6%) survived for more than 90 d; these patients had no residual neurologic deficit. Hemodynamics obtained within 3 mo before CPR did not show any significant differences between the survivors and nonsurvivors. Except for one patient, all long-term survivors had identifiable causes of circulatory arrest that were rapidly reversible. Our data indicate that CPR for circulatory arrest in patients with PAH is rarely successful unless the cause of the cardiopulmonary decompensation can be corrected.     

Survival after sudden cardiac arrest in hospital

Although there are many reports on sudden cardiac arrest occurring outside the hospital, little is known about the precise prognostic factors that determine the outcome after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Clinical information before and immediately after sudden cardiac arrest is frequently incomplete because the event occurs outside the hospital. We studied 90 consecutive patients with sudden and unexpected cardiac arrest who were resuscitated in the general ward of our hospital. Twenty-five (28%) were discharged from the hospital. Multivariate analysis revealed that the promptness of initiation of CPR, age, severity of cardiac dysfunction, time and the type of arrhythmia are of significance in relation to survival. To evaluate long-term survival after hospital cardiac arrest, we analyzed long-term follow-up data accumulated during a 16 year period. In the group of 25 patients in our study, there have been a total of 10 deaths (40%). Five of the 10 deaths resulted from recurrent cardiac arrest and 1 was a noncardiac death. There was a high rate of recurrence of cardiac arrest in the first year following resuscitation, especially among the cardiomyopathy patients.     

不同方式在心跳呼吸骤停进行心肺复苏时的应用效果对比评价

目的 探析心跳呼吸骤停患者应用不同心肺复苏方式的临床效果.方法 将79例2018年10月-2020年1月在我院治疗的心跳呼吸骤停患者选为研究对象,依据心肺复苏方式不同分成两组,对照组与实验组.对照组39例患者予以人工心肺复苏治疗,实验组40例患者予以心肺复苏机治疗,对比两组患者按压有效率、并发症发生率及临床相关指标水平.结果 在按压有效率上,实验组数据为97.50%,对照组数据为82.05%,组间比较有统计学差异(P<0.05).在并发症发生率上,实验组数据为5.00%,对照组数据为7.69%,组间比较无统计学差异(P>0.05).在临床相关指标上,两组PaO2(氧分压)、SaO2(血氧饱和度)比较无统计学差异(P>0.05);实验组PaCO2(二氧化碳分压)、SP(收缩压)均高于对照组,组间比较有统计学差异(P<0.05).结论 相较于人工心肺复苏治疗而言,心肺复苏机治疗心跳呼吸骤停患者的效果更加显著,按压有效率更高,且不会增加并发症的发生,值得临床借鉴应用.     

Efficacy of pneumatic trousers in refractory prehospital cardiopulmonary arrest

Persons refractory to early application of advanced cardiac life support have a dismal prognosis. New modalities are needed to treat this almost universally lethal condition. We have evaluated pneumatic trousers in the treatment of refractory cardiopulmonary arrest. To date 136 patients have been entered into this controlled, prospective, randomized study. All patients were more than 20 years old and in cardiac arrest of apparent cardiac etiology. Patients were excluded if they had arrested secondary to trauma or overdose, or if an IV could not be started. In addition, patients had to be refractory to therapies included in our paramedic standing orders. If at the end of these standing orders the patient remained in arrest, he was entered into the study and pneumatic trousers were applied or not according to a randomized list. The attempted resuscitation was then continued with no other preset variables. The resuscitation and discharge rates for the control group were 21% and 4%, respectively. With pneumatic trousers, resuscitation increased to 33%, and discharge to 9%. The control group in ventricular fibrillation (VF) had a 27% resuscitation rate and a 5% discharge rate. The pneumatic trousers group with VF had a 35% resuscitation rate and a 12% discharge rate. In pulseless idioventricular rhythm (PIVR), the control group had a 0% resuscitation rate and a 0% discharge rate. In marked contrast, for PIVR the pneumatic trousers group had a 35% resuscitation rate and a 9% discharge rate. The control group in asystole (AS) had a 25% resuscitation rate and a 0% discharge rate. The pneumatic trousers group in AS had a 27% resuscitation rate and a 0% discharge rate. The improvement in resuscitation rate with pneumatic trousers was statistically significant only for the initial rhythm of PIVR (P less than .05). The pneumatic trousers improved resuscitation and discharge rates for refractory VF, but not to a statistically significant degree. These somewhat enhanced resuscitation and discharge rates with the pneumatic trousers make it an adjunct to be considered in refractory arrest.     

Results of cardiac resuscitation in 552 patients

A five year experience in the resuscitation of 552 patients who suffered cardiac arrest in the wards and in the emergency department of a large general hospital has shown that 14.9 per cent (82 patients) survived to be discharged from hospital. Of the survivors, 86.5 per cent came from six diagnostic groups — coronary artery disease, respiratory failure, pulmonary embolism, complications of angiographic technics, StokesAdams disease and cardiomyopathy, which represent 336 patients (60.8% of the total). By contrast, only 13.5 per cent of the survivors came from the miscellaneous group of 216 cases. The percentage of those who survived to be discharged has remained remarkably constant from year to year. A follow-up has shown that the majority of survivors are alive and active many months after the resuscitation.     

Bystander mouth-to-mouth ventilation and regurgitation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there is an association between bystander mouth-to-mouth ventilation and regurgitation in prehospital cardiac arrest patients. DESIGN: Prospectively conducted observational study. SETTING: Data were collected from patients treated by the emergency medical service (EMS) systems in three middle-sized or large Finnish urban communities, the Tampere District EMS and the physician-staffed Helicopter EMSs in the Helsinki and Turku areas in southern Finland. SUBJECTS: The study population consisted of 529 consecutive prehospital cardiac arrest patients with attempted resuscitation. Exclusion criteria were cardiac arrest due to trauma or drug overdose. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Regurgitation in prehospital cardiac arrest patients documented by EMS personnel on the scene. RESULTS: Regurgitation occurred in a fourth of patients. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with mouth-to-mouth ventilation was associated with a significantly increased risk of regurgitation compared with no CPR (P < 0.013) and CPR without ventilations (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The mode and role of bystander CPR in cardiac arrest needs to be further evaluated.     

Comparison of epinephrine and phenylephrine for resuscitation and neurologic outcome of cardiac arrest in dogs

A study was done comparing resuscitability and 24-hour neurologic outcome in fibrillating dogs that were treated with either phenylephrine (a primary alpha agonist) or epinephrine. Ventricular fibrillation was induced electrically in 18 dogs. After three minutes, standard CPR was instituted using a mechanical resuscitator. Dogs were given phenylephrine or epinephrine at nine minutes and defibrillation was attempted at 12 minutes. Dogs underwent hemodynamic monitoring and pharmacologic support, if necessary, for an additional 90 minutes. At four, eight, 12, and 24 hours, a standard neurologic examination was performed and deficit scores were assigned by an observer blinded to the drug given. Fourteen of the 18 dogs were resuscitated. There were no statistically significant differences in the epinephrine- or phenylephrine-treated groups with regard to number of animals resuscitated, time and interventions required for resuscitation, initial cardiac rhythm post resuscitation, or occurrence of ventricular fibrillation during resuscitation. No differences were found in arterial, central venous, or myocardial perfusion pressures during CPR. Phenylephrine-treated dogs tended to have higher mean pressures in the critical care period (15 to 30 minutes), although this was not significant. Total neurologic deficit scores were 127.8 +/- 83.8 for the phenylephrine-treated group and 129.4 +/- 87.4 for the epinephrine group. No significant differences were found in the level of consciousness, cranial nerve function, motor skills, or general behavior scores. We conclude that there is no difference in neurologic or cardiovascular outcome when phenylephrine is compared to epinephrine in a canine model of cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.     

Outcome of adult cardiopulmonary resuscitations at a tertiary referral center including results of "limited" resuscitations

BACKGROUND: The results of in-hospital resuscitations may depend on a variety of factors related to the patient, the environment, and the extent of resuscitation efforts. We studied these factors in a large tertiary referral hospital with a dedicated certified resuscitation team responding to all cardiac arrests. METHODS: Statistical analysis of 445 prospectively recorded resuscitation records of patients who experienced cardiac arrest and received advanced cardiac life support resuscitation. We also report the outcomes of an additional 37 patients who received limited resuscitation efforts because of advance directives prohibiting tracheal intubation, chest compressions, or both. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival immediately after resuscitation, at 24 hours, at 48 hours, and until hospital discharge. RESULTS: Overall, 104 (23%) of 445 patients who received full advanced cardiac life support survived to hospital discharge. Survival was highest for patients with primary cardiac disease (30%), followed by those with infectious diseases (15%), with only 8% of patients with end-stage diseases surviving to hospital discharge. Neither sex nor age affected survival. Longer resuscitations, increased epinephrine and atropine administration, multiple defibrillations, and multiple arrhythmias were all associated with poor survival. Patients who experienced arrests on a nursing unit or intensive care unit had better survival rates than those in other hospital locations. Survival for witnessed arrests (25%) was significantly better than for nonwitnessed arrests (7%) (P =.005). There was a disproportionately high incidence of nonwitnessed arrests during the night (12 AM to 6 AM) in unmonitored beds, resulting in uniformly poor survival to hospital discharge (0%). None of the patients whose advance directives limited resuscitation survived. CONCLUSIONS: Very ill patients in unmonitored beds are at increased risk for a nonwitnessed cardiac arrest and poor resuscitation outcome during the night. Closer vigilance of these patients at night is warranted. The outcome of limited resuscitation efforts is very poor.     

A new performance indicator for acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE—To develop a performance indicator for acute myocardial infarction which would reliably measure success of treatment and which might provide an alternative to case fatality as an audited outcome.
DESIGN—A two year audit of all cases of acute myocardial infarction and resuscitated cases of out of hospital cardiac arrest from coronary heart disease in patients under 75 years of age. Behaviour of patients in calling for help, performance of the ambulance services in treating out of hospital arrest, and of the hospitals in providing resuscitation and thrombolytic treatment are audited separately.
SETTING—Four district general hospitals.
AUDITED INTERVENTIONS—Resuscitation from cardiac arrest and thrombolytic treatment.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES—Hospital case fatality and lives saved/1000 patients treated.
RESULTS—Overall, the lives of 83/1000 patients were saved (95% confidence interval 70 to 96). Of these, 29 (35%) were saved by out of hospital resuscitation and 38 (46%) by in hospital resuscitation from cardiac arrest. It was estimated that 16 lives (19%) were saved by thrombolytic treatment. There were no significant differences in case fatality among the hospitals.
CONCLUSIONS—Lives saved/1000 patients treated is an easily measurable index and assesses performance of the ambulance service as well as of the hospital. Because it is relatively insensitive to diagnostic definitions, it may provide a robust alternative to case fatality as a performance indicator.


Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; audit; case fatality; outcome indicators     

Cost-effectiveness analysis of paramedic emergency medical services in the treatment of prehospital cardiopulmonary arrest

STUDY OBJECTIVES: 1) Identification of marginal costs associated with prehospital resuscitation of cardiopulmonary arrest; 2) Determination of cost effectiveness for such resuscitation; and 3) Comparison of cost effectiveness of paramedic care with selected other medical interventions. DESIGN: Retrospective review of 190 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. SETTING: City limits of a midsized southwestern city. The events studied took place outside of medical facilities. TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS: Victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest for whom the EMS system was activated by a 911 telephone request for emergency medical assistance. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The cost, including training, personnel, equipment, and response time maintenance, per year of life saved was found to be $8,886.00 for paramedic care. This result was compared with published cost-effectiveness figures for heart transplantation, liver transplantation, bone marrow transplantation, and chemotherapy for acute leukemia. Paramedic care was more cost effective, as measured by cost per year of life saved, than organ transplantation and chemotherapy for acute leukemia. CONCLUSION: Out-of-hospital treatment by paramedics of cardiopulmonary arrest is more cost effective than heart, liver, bone marrow transplantation, or curative chemotherapy for acute leukemia.