Internal carotid artery occlusion: operative risks and long-term stroke rates after contralateral carotid endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND. To determine the short- and long-term benefits of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) contralateral to an occluded internal carotid (ICA), we reviewed our experience since 1976. METHODS. In 66 (13.8%) of 478 patients undergoing 544 CEAs, the contralateral ICA was occluded. Mean follow-up was 50.1 months (range, 1 to 165 months). Complete follow-up was available in 83.0% of patients. RESULTS. Operative death occurred in one (1.5%) of 66 patients with contralateral occlusion and six (1.3%) of 478 patients without contralateral occlusion (p = 0.99). Operative strokes occurred in two (3.0%) of 66 patients with contralateral occlusion and 14 (2.9%) of 478 without contralateral occlusion (p = 0.99). Life-table stroke-free rates at 1, 3, 5, and 8 years were 96.8%, 93.0%, and 93.0% in patients with contralateral occlusion and 95.9%, 94.2%, 91.1%, and 88.0% in patients without contralateral occlusion (p = 0.36). Five- and 8-year stroke-free rates were 100% and 100% in the asymptomatic subgroup with occlusion, 95.9% and 92.2% in the asymptomatic subgroup without occlusion (p = 0.45), 91.2% and 91.2% in the symptomatic subgroup with occlusion, and 89.7% and 86.8% in the symptomatic subgroup without occlusion (p = 0.47). Life-table survival rates at 5 and 8 years were 72.5% and 56.0% in patients with contralateral occlusion and 81.8% and 69.0% in patients without contralateral occlusion (p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS. CEA performed in patients with and without symptoms with a contralateral ICA occlusion produces short- and long-term mortality and stroke morbidity rates comparable to those of similar patients without contralateral ICA occlusion. The indications for CEA in patients with contralateral ICA occlusion should not differ from those applied to patients without contralateral occlusion.     

Natural history of carotid artery occlusion contralateral to carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND: The natural history of patients with carotid artery occlusion is controversial. A few studies have concluded that patients with internal carotid artery occlusion carry a high risk of neurologic events. None of these previously reported studies analyze the natural history of internal artery occlusion contralateral to carotid endarterectomy (CEA), except for a small series including a subset of patients from two randomized trials, the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. This study analyzes the natural history of patients with carotid artery occlusion contralateral to CEA, specifically assessing long-term neurologic events occurring in the hemisphere associated with the occluded carotid artery. METHODS: Of the 599 CEAs in 544 patients that were included in two previously updated prospective studies, 63 patients had contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion, and their perioperative and long-term outcomes were evaluated. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the rate of freedom from late stroke occurring in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the occluded carotid artery. The stroke-free survival rate was also noted. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 58 months (range, 1 to 147 months). One perioperative stroke (1.6%) occurred, which was not in the cerebral hemisphere ipsilateral to the occluded carotid artery. Two late strokes (3.2%) and nine transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) (14.3%) occurred involving the hemisphere of the occluded carotid artery. There were also three late TIAs (4.8%) and no late strokes involving the hemisphere supplied by the operative site. There were a total of 14 late deaths. Fifteen patients had late > or =50% restenosis of the operative side. Six of these had neurologic events (TIA/stroke) involving the hemisphere of the occluded carotid artery, in contrast to five of 48 patients with no restenosis who had neurologic symptoms (P < .001). Freedom from late strokes in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the occluded carotid artery at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was 98%, 96%, 96%, and 96%, respectively. The stroke-free survival rates at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were 90%, 87%, 80%, and 59%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The natural history of carotid artery occlusion contralateral to CEA is relatively benign. This may suggest a protective effect of carotid endarterectomy on the cerebral hemisphere ipsilateral to the carotid occlusion from late strokes.     

Carotid endarterectomy contralateral to carotid artery occlusion: analysis from a randomized study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Many studies have reported the benefits of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) contralateral to an occluded internal carotid artery (ICA), with varying results. This study analyzed perioperative and late outcomes in a recent trial in which patients were randomized to carotid eversion endarterectomy (CEE) or traditional CEA with patching (CEAP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 336 primary CEAs (310 patients) 68 were contralateral to an occluded ICA (group I). The remaining 268 CEAs served as control group (group II). All patients underwent clinical follow-up and duplex ultrasonography at 1, 6, and 12 months and every year thereafter. Endpoints of the study were early and late neurological events, and deaths. RESULTS: Group I had a significantly higher incidence of perioperative electroencephalic changes and need for shunting. The perioperative stroke rate in group I was almost three times as high as in group II, but the difference was not significant. Similarly, the perioperative minor neurological event and death rates, as with the cumulative stroke-free and survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years, were comparable in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: CEA contralateral to an occluded ICA can be implemented with perioperative stroke and mortality rates and late stroke-free and survival rates comparable to CEA with no contralateral ICA occlusion.     

Management of internal carotid artery occlusion

Although attempts to restore patency of occluded internal carotid arteries are now rarely made, endarterectomy in the contralateral artery, external carotid endarterectomy and until recently EC/IC bypass have remained surgical options in the management of such patients. Over a four-year period at this institution 104 patients underwent carotid endarterectomy for stenosis. In this group the contralateral carotid was patent (Group A). Fifty-four patients with unilateral carotid artery occlusion underwent contralateral endarterectomy (Group B), 8 underwent ECA/ICA bypass (Group C) and 4 an ECA endarterectomy (Group D). No statistically significant difference was noted in perioperative stroke and death rates for Groups A and B were (1% and 1%) and (3.7% and 1.9%) respectively. One Group C patient died from perioperative stroke (12.5%). For late events the life table adjusted annual rates for stroke and mortality were similar, Group A (stroke 2.1% and death 5%), and Group B (stroke 1.6% and death 5%). In Group C stroke rate was 10% and death 3%. All four patients undergoing ECA endarterectomy were relieved of their symptoms. It is concluded that in patients with internal carotid artery occlusion TEA may be performed with perioperative morbidity and mortality rates comparable to those when the opposite carotid artery is patent. The late outcome for stroke compares favorably with the reported natural history of the disease and outcome for such patients treated medically in the Joint Study of Extracranial Occlusion and EC-IC Bypass Study. External carotid artery endarterectomy appears useful in the treatment of embolic events on the occluded side. ECA/ICA bypass does not appear to confer benefit.     

Is Contralateral Carotid Artery Occlusion a Risk Factor for Carotid Endarterectomy?

Occlusion of the contralateral internal carotid artery (ICA) is considered to have a significant impact on the outcome of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The purpose of this study was to review one center’s experience concerning CEA opposite an occluded ICA, to see whether results differed from those obtained in patients with patent contralateral ICA in terms of relevant neurologic complication rate (RNCR, fatal + disabling stroke), stroke-free rate, and survival rate. From January 1997 to December 2002, 1,381 patients underwent a total of 1,445 CEAs at the Department of Vascular Surgery of Padua University. Patients were divided into two groups: group A included 144 patients with occlusion of the contralateral ICA and group B consisted of 1,237 patients with a patent contralateral ICA. There was no postoperative mortality in patients of group A, while in group B, two patients died as a result of myocardial infarction and cardiac failure and one died as a direct result of perioperative stroke. Postoperative disabling strokes occurred in one (0.7%) patient in group A and 10 (0.8%) patients in group B (p > 0.5). At 72 months, there were no statistical differences between the two groups in terms of RNCR, stroke-free rate, and late death. Our results show that contralateral carotid occlusion does not reduce the safety of CEA. The efficacy in terms of RNCR, stroke-free rate, and late survival is no different in patients with contralateral carotid occlusion.     

Long-term results after carotid endarterectomy for carotid artery stenosis with contralateral occlusion

Patients with one internal carotid artery occlusion and a contralateral stenosis run a significantly higher risk of stroke. We performed endarterectomy of the stenotic carotid in 44 such patients and followed them for mean 54 months (range 1–172 months). Early mortality was 2%. Life-table analysis shows that the incidence of a new stroke was 0.6% per year, the survival rate was 78% after three years, and 70% after five years. We conclude that carotid endarterectomy can be safely performed in patients with contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion and can significantly improve the long-term prognosis of these patients.     

Early and late outcome after carotid artery bypass grafting with saphenous vein

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to determine outcome and durability of internal carotid artery bypass grafting with saphenous vein. METHODS: Data for 50 patients undergoing serial clinical and ultrasound surveillance were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Bypass grafting was performed in 50 patients between 1995 and 2002, the commonest reasons being excessive endarterectomy zone thinning or penetrating atheroma (n = 22), severe internal carotid artery coiling above the endarterectomy zone (n = 14), and patch infection (n = 5). Perioperative mortality was 2%, and death and stroke rate was 6%. Perioperative complications were associated with complex cardiovascular events, including hemorrhage after prosthetic patch infection, on-table thrombosis after endarterectomy, and synchronous carotid artery-cardiac reconstruction. One patient had a late ipsilateral stroke (10 months; normal scan). Cumulative stroke-free survival at 3 years (including operative events) was 91%. Cumulative freedom from recurrent stenosis greater than 70% or occlusion was 86% at 1 year and 83% at 3 years. Severe recurrent stenosis or occlusion developed in 7 patients, within 9 months of surgery in 6 patients and with 18 months in 1 patient. Angioplasty was performed without complication (no protection device, no stent) in 5 patients, 3 of whom required repeat angioplasty on at least one further occasion. CONCLUSIONS: In common with venous conduits elsewhere, carotid artery bypass grafting with saphenous vein is associated with a high incidence of early graft stenosis. The long-term stroke risk, however, is low. Carotid artery bypass grafting is a safe and durable alternative when endarterectomy would prove hazardous or inadvisable, but regular surveillance is necessary.     

Stenosis of one carotid artery with occlusion of the contralateral carotid

Summary 23 patients with unilateral internal carotid artery stenosis (>70%) and contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion in the neck are reported. The symptoms are referable to the side of the occlusion in 13 cases (57%), to the side of stenosis in 7 cases (30%) and non-localizing in 3 cases (13%). All 23 patients had a carotid endarterectomy performed on the side of the stenotic lesion. There was no operative mortality. Late neurological symptomatology after surgery was referable to the side of stenosis in 13% and to the side of occlusion in 9%. The authors consider that, in cases of significant stenosis (greater than 70%) of an internal carotid artery with a contralateral occlusion, preference should always be given to endarterectomy of the stenotic side, reserving extra-intracranial by-pass of the occluded side for patients who remain symptomatic after endarterectomy of the stenotic side.     

Should patient age be a consideration in carotid endarterectomy?

Age as a factor in the selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy was studied with a retrospective evaluation of the perioperative and late results of procedures performed on 115 elderly patients. The results were taken from an experience of 685 operations performed on 607 patients. Perioperative results in 420 patients under 75 years of age (560 operations) were compared with results in 115 patients over 75 years of age (125 operations). Statistical comparison revealed a greater proportion of men in group I (66%, 55%, p = 0.0186) and a greater proportion of patients in group II with contralateral carotid stenosis (24%, 33%, p = 0.0382) and stroke as a preoperative indication for operation (14%, 22%, p = 0.0393). No statistical difference was found between group I and group II as regards other operative indications, contralateral carotid occlusion, bilaterality of operation, emergency operation, operation for recurrent carotid disease, frequency of shunt use, perioperative wound bleeding, and perioperative transient ischemic attack. Ipsilateral perioperative stroke occurred in 12 patients (2%), with all strokes occurring in the younger group of patients (2.4%) (NS). Perioperative death occurred in six (1%) patients, with five deaths (1%) occurring in the younger group (cardiac, 2; stroke, 2; protamine reaction, 1) and one (0.9%) death occurring in the elderly group of patients (ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm) (NS). Life-table analysis of the late results of the 115 elderly patients revealed cumulative survival rates of 85.4% and 63.8% at 2 and 5 years, respectively. The principal causes of late death were cardiac (48%), cancer (15%), and stroke (9%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Stump pressure, the contralateral carotid artery, and electroencephalographic changes

Electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring and measurement of stump pressure are the most widely employed methods of assessing the risk of cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy. The status of the contralateral carotid artery has also been thought to influence the need for placing a shunt. The relationship of EEG monitoring, stump pressure, and the contralateral carotid artery has not been completely delineated. We retrospectively reviewed these three variables in 113 patients undergoing 124 carotid endarterectomies. The contralateral artery was classified as occluded, stenotic (greater than 50% decrease in diameter), or nonstenotic. There was a 48% incidence of EEG changes with contralateral occlusion, 18% with stenosis, and 21% with nonstenotic arteries (p = 0.014). There was a 73% incidence of EEG changes when the stump pressure was less than 25 mm Hg, 32% when the stump pressure was 25 to 50 mm Hg, and 2% when the stump pressure was greater than 50 mm Hg (p less than 0.001). There was no significant difference in the mean stump pressure for patients with occlusion (43.8 mm Hg), stenosis (44.7 mm Hg), or nonstenotic contralateral arteries (51.3 mm Hg). All patients with contralateral occlusion and a stump pressure less than 25 mm Hg had EEG changes. No patient with a stump pressure greater than 50 mm Hg and a patent contralateral artery had EEG changes. Although the incidence of EEG changes in the majority of patients was not accurately predicted by the stump pressure and the status of the contralateral carotid artery, stump pressure less than or equal to 50 mm Hg was sensitive, identifying 97% of patients with EEG changes.     

Carotid endarterectomy without protective measures in patients with occluded and non occluded contralateral carotid artery

BACKGROUND: Comparison of carotid endarterectomy in patients with and without occluded contralateral carotid artery. METHODS: Design: evaluation of results without using shunt or patch. Setting: Hospital, Medical School, University of Athens. Subjects: 235 patients, divided into group I of 40 patients with and group II of 195 patients without occluded contralateral carotid artery. Intervention: carotid endarterectomy under general anesthesia. Main outcome measures: heparin administration, stable hemodynamic status during clamping, short duration monitoring postoperatively. RESULTS: Postoperative morbidity of both groups was 2.5% (6/235) and mortality 1.7% (4/235). Group I: mortality rate was 2.5% (1/40) major and minor stroke each 2.5% (1/40) and group I: 1.5% (3/195) and 1% (2/195) respectively (NS). Four to 108 months later, 30% (12/40) of group I and 21% (41/195) of group II died. CONCLUSIONS: Endarterectomy of the carotid artery under general anesthesia without use of shunt and patch in patients with or without occlusion of the contralateral carotid artery presented the same comparative results. Candidates for carotid endarterectomy should be screened systematically for coronary disease preoperatively and annual stress testing postoperatively, tactics which may improve early and late mortality rate after carotid surgery.     

Immediate and long-term results of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic high-grade stenosis

We examined the operative risks and long-term results of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic patients in terms of stroke, death, and recurrent stenosis. The results of a nonrandomized study with a follow-up of 1 to 104 months (mean 46 months) is reported. A tertiary referral center served as the setting for this report. One hundred consecutive patients with severe but asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis out of a total of 514 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy were entered into this study. The severity of carotid disease was determined by duplex scanning and confirmed arteriographically. No patients were lost to follow-up after surgery. Eighty-nine operations (77%) were done under cervical block anesthesia and all arteries were closed with saphenous vein patches. Life-table analysis showed that the stroke-free rate at 5 years was 96.3% with an ipsilateral stroke-free rate of 98.2%. The 5-year overall survival rate was 78.2% with a stroke-free survival rate of 75%. Carotid endarterectomy can be performed safely for asymptomatic patients believed to be at risk for stroke. The potential for early death due to myocardial disease, late stroke, and recurrent stenosis do not justify advising patients against undergoing prophylactic carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic high-grade stenosis.     

Carotid endarterectomy in women: challenging the results from ACAS and NASCET

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the short- and long-term outcomes in female and male patients after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Randomized carotid trials have clearly shown the benefits of CEA in specific symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. However, the short- and long-term benefits in women appear to be less clear, and the role of CEA among women with carotid disease remains uncertain. METHODS: During a 21-year period, 1,204 CEAs were performed, 464 (39%) in women and 739 (61%) in men. Complete follow-up was available in 70% of patients. RESULTS: Women were less likely to have evidence of coronary artery disease, were more likely to be hypertensive, and had a significantly greater incidence of diabetes. The mean age at CEA was 68.5 +/- 9.5 years for women and 68.0 +/- 8.5 years for men. There were no significant differences in the use of shunts, patching, tacking sutures, or severity of carotid stenoses between men and women. Surgical death rates were nearly identical for asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Perioperative stroke rates were similar for asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Life-table stroke-free rates at 1, 5, and 8 years were similar for asymptomatic women and men and symptomatic women and men. Long-term survival rates at 1, 5, and 8 years were higher for asymptomatic women compared with men and for symptomatic women compared with men. As a result, stroke-free survival rates at these follow-up intervals were greater for asymptomatic women compared with men, and for symptomatic women compared to men. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study challenge the conclusions from the Asymptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Study and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial regarding the benefits of CEA in women. Female gender did not adversely affect early or late survival, stroke-free, or stroke-free death rates after CEA. The authors conclude that CEA can be performed safely in women with asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid artery disease, and physicians should expect comparable benefits and outcomes in women and men undergoing CEA.     

EEG as a criterion for shunt need in carotid endarterectomy

The efficacy of continuous intraoperative electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring as a criterion for selective shunt use during carotid endarterectomy is evaluated in a group of 1661 operations in which the EEG was the sole criterion for shunt insertion. EEG monitoring is measured by the intraoperative stroke rate. Carotid stump pressure measurements were recorded as an additional observation in 1517 operations and represent a subset of the study group allowing comparison of this technique with EEG. Intraoperative stroke rate for the 1661 operations in the study group was 0.03% (five strokes). A statistically significant increase in intraoperative stroke rate was associated with the development of an abnormal EEG (1.1%), contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion (1.8%), and the combination of both abnormal EEG and contralateral internal carotid occlusion (3.3%). The EEG remained normal in 1295 operations including 75 operations with contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion. One minor intraoperative stroke (0.08%) which resolved in 1 week occurred in the absence of an EEG change with no intraoperative strokes in the 75 operations in which the contralateral internal carotid artery was occluded. Intraoperative EEG monitoring accurately (99.92%) identified patients who may safely have carotid endarterectomy without the need of a shunt.     

Current management of the patient with internal carotid artery occlusion

Despite the recent controversy concerning surgical therapy of patients with carotid artery disease, rational therapeutic plans can be developed based on available data. The patient who is symptomatic from occlusion of one or both internal carotid arteries is at particularly high risk for development of stroke and can ill-afford indecision. All symptomatic patients, therefore, with any of the extracranial occlusive disease patterns described are potential surgical candidates. Conversely, among the asymptomatic patients with these same patterns of occlusion, only those with internal carotid occlusion and contralateral stenosis should be considered for surgical therapy. Treatment must be individualised and directed at revascularising stenotic (not occluded) internal carotid arteries, or important collateral vessels such as the external carotid artery and in fewer cases the vertebral artery. The asymptomatic patient with unilateral internal carotid artery occlusion and no contralateral lesions should be monitored closely with Duplex scanning for development of a contralateral stenosis. When a stenosis of 80% or greater is encountered, strong consideration should be given to prophylactic endarterectomy in these patients due to their high risk for stroke. Endarterectomy for a 50-60% stenosis may also be reasonable in a single patent internal carotid artery. In the absence of a significant contralateral stenosis, no treatment is necessary. Individuals with internal carotid artery occlusion and symptoms referable to a contralateral carotid stenosis should also be managed with endarterectomy of the stenotic carotid artery.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Does contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion increase the risk of carotid endarterectomy?

The results of every carotid endarterectomy performed contralateral to an internal carotid artery occlusion (n = 36) (group I) were compared with those performed contralateral to a patent internal carotid artery (n = 169) (group II) over the last 10 years. The patients in each group were evenly matched with respect to male gender (66% vs 69%); mean age (66.7 vs 65.9 years); and incidence of hypertension (55.6% vs 53.2%), diabetes (16.7% vs 20.1%), and hyperlipidemia (8.3% vs 11.8%). Patients in group I had a higher incidence of previous myocardial infarction (25% vs 11.8%, p less than 0.05) and exertional angina (55.6% vs 29.6%, p less than 0.01). Indications for carotid endarterectomy were equivalent, including stroke (19.4% vs 21.9%), transient ischemic attacks (36.1% vs 35.5%), amaurosis fugax (16.7% vs 11.8%), nonhemispheric symptoms (5.6% vs 8.3%), and asymptomatic stenoses (22.2% vs 22.5%), respectively. Perioperative strokes occurred in one (2.8%) patient in group I and seven (4.1%) patients in group II (NS). Among the patients in group II the incidence of perioperative stroke did not correlate directly with the degree of contralateral ICA stenosis: greater than 90% (4%); 70% to 90% (6.7%); 50% to 70% (8.7%); and less than 50% (2.8%). The operative mortality rate was 0% among patients in group I and 1.2% among patients in group II (NS). Cardiac complications occurred in two (5.6%) patients in group I and nine (5.3%) patients in group II (NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during carotid surgery

Controversy exists over the value of intraoperative monitoring and shunting in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Although it is widely believed that contralateral carotid occlusion and previous stroke mandate intraoperative shunting, the susceptibility of these two groups of patients to cerebral ischemia during carotid artery endarterectomy is not well defined. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) were monitored in 113 carotid artery endarterectomy patients. Of these, 32 (28.3%) had a previous stroke, 24 (21.2%) had a contralateral carotid occlusion and 33 (29.2%) were diabetic. There were no deaths and only one perioperative stroke (0.9%). Cerebral ischemia occurred in 14 patients (12.4%). Six of these patients had a contralateral carotid occlusion. Some 29 patients (25.7%) were shunted, including 10 with contralateral carotid occlusions that did not have major SSEP changes. In the latter half of the study, 14 patients with contralateral carotid occlusions were selectively shunted (six shunted, eight not shunted) with no neurological complications. Thirty-two patients with prior strokes were selectively shunted (nine shunted, 23 not shunted); of these, one shunted patient undergoing combined carotid artery endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting had a perioperative stroke. Intraoperative monitoring with SSEPs accurately identifies cerebral ischemia secondary to carotid clamping as well as patients requiring shunts. With the use of intraoperative SSEP monitoring, selective shunting may be safely performed in patients with a contralateral carotid occlusion or a previous stroke.     

Does contralateral carotid occlusion influence neurologic fate of carotid endarterectomy?

Divergent opinions regarding operative risks and late prognosis of patients undergoing endarterectomy for carotid stenosis with contralateral carotid occlusion have prompted a review of the experience at Emory University Hospital from Jan. 1, 1978, through Dec. 31, 1982. Fifty-four patients (37 men, 17 women; mean age 63 years) who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with contralateral carotid occlusion (group I) were compared with 410 demographically similar patients without contralateral carotid occlusion (group II) who underwent 503 CEAs during the same interval. CEA indications in group I were the following and were proportionately similar to those of group II: hemispheric transient ischemic attacks, 22 patients; asymptomatic stenosis, 12 patients; nonhemispheric symptoms, 11 patients; previous cerebral infarction, eight patients; and vascular tinnitus, one patient. General anesthesia, routine intraluminal shunting, systemic heparinization, and arteriotomy closure without patch were routinely employed in both groups. Three patients in group I suffered permanent neurologic deficits after operation (5.6%) and two had transient postoperative deficits with complete recovery. Ten patients (2.0%) in group II suffered permanent neurologic deficits and 10 patients experienced transient neurologic events after operation. Neither the transient nor the permanent neurologic deficit rates were statistically different (p greater than 0.05; Fisher exact test) in the two groups. Operative mortality rates for group I and group II were 0% and 0.8%, respectively, and were not significantly different (p greater than 0.10; Fisher exact test). Late postoperative ischemic brain infarctions occurred in two patients in group I (3.8%) and in 13 patients (3.6%) in group II (p greater than 0.10; Fisher exact test). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were virtually identical in both groups, with the majority of deaths caused by cardiac occlusion may undergo CEA with morbidity and mortality rates similar to those without contralateral occlusions. Contralateral carotid occlusion does not necessarily portend an unfavorable early or late prognosis after CEA.     

Safety and long-term benefit of carotid endarterectomy in the asymptomatic patient

In order to determine the safety and long-term salutary effects of carotid endarterectomy in the asymptomatic patient, we retrospectively reviewed all asymptomatic patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy from 1980 through 1986. There were 60 carotid endarterectomies performed in 54 patients, 53 men and one woman. The mean age was 64 years. Arteriography revealed a high grade stenosis of 70% or greater in 46 carotid arteries (77%), ulceration in five (8%), and both in nine (15%). Risk factors included coronary artery disease in 60% of patients, smoking in 87%, hypertension in 67%, and diabetes in 22%. Perioperative morbidity included three cranial nerve injuries, one myocardial infarction and one contralateral stroke. There were no deaths. Mean follow-up was 47 months with only two patients being lost to follow-up. During follow-up three patients suffered ipsilateral transient ischemic attacks without recurrent carotid stenosis and one patient had a transient ischemic attack secondary to contralateral carotid occlusion. There was one ipsilateral stroke occurring two years after operation secondary to restenosis that required reoperation and four late contralateral strokes. Ten patients died in the follow-up period. Causes of death were stroke (1), cardiac (4), malignancy (2), pulmonary (2), and unknown (1). All surviving patients were evaluated by duplex scan at a mean interval following surgery of 47 months. Restenosis of endarterectomized arteries was seen at the following rates: less than 50% in 41 (87%); 50–75% in four (8.5%); 80% in one (2%); and 90% in one (2%). Life table analysis revealed a 98% ipsilateral stroke-free rate at five and eight years. In summary, (1) carotid endarterectomy in the asymptomatic patient can be done with low morbidity and virtually no mortality. (2) Late stroke occurs rarely in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the operated carotid artery. (3) Objective follow-up by duplex scanning shows only a 4% incidence of significant restenosis. (4) The low restenosis rate correlates with the low long-term stroke rate.Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society, New York, New York, June 17, 1989.     

Combined surgical approach to coexistent carotid and coronary artery disease.

Combined coronary artery bypass and carotid endarterectomy were performed in 52 patients (mean age 61 years) between 1981 and 1990. Of these, 36 (69%) had functional class III-IV angina pectoris, 33 (63%) had triple-vessel disease, 36 (69%) had one, or more, previous myocardial infarctions, and 33 (63%) had an abnormal left ventricular function. In 4 cases, additional cardiac procedures were performed. Asymptomatic carotid stenosis was documented in 29 patients (56%) and the remaining 23 (44%) had experienced cerebrovascular symptoms. All patients had hemodynamically significant stenosis of at least one carotid artery, 17 (33%) had severe bilateral carotid artery stenosis, and 6 (11%) had an additional occlusion of the contralateral internal carotid artery. There were no early deaths. Perioperative morbidity included: myocardial infarction in 4 patients (7.7%) and neurological deficit in 3 (5.7%) but functional impairment was not permanent. Late results have been obtained for all 52 patients at a mean postoperative interval of 35 months. Four patients (7.7%) have died, and the 5 year life-table survival rate was 83%. At five years, actuarial curves showed 67% of patients to be free of all serious events or death. Late mortality and morbidity were related above all to the progression of the coronary artery disease. We concluded that simultaneous endarterectomy of significant carotid artery stenosis in candidates for coronary bypass can be done safely and considered as more practical for the patient.