Ventricular Arrhythmia Inducibility Predicts Subsequent ICD Activation in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients: A DEFINITE Substudy

Objectives: We evaluated whether electrophysiologic (EP) inducibility predicts the subsequent occurrence of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in the Defibrillators in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation (DEFINITE) trial.
Background: Inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias has been widely used as a risk marker to select implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) candidates, but is believed not to be predictive in nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients.
Methods: In DEFINITE, patients randomized to the ICD arm, but not the conventional arm, underwent noninvasive EP testing via the ICD shortly after ICD implantation using up to three extrastimuli at three cycle lengths plus burst pacing. Inducibility was defined as monomorphic or polymorphic VT or VF lasting 15 seconds. Patients were followed for a median of 29 ± 14 months (interquartile range = 2–41). An independent committee, blinded to inducibility status, characterized the rhythm triggering ICD shocks.
Results: Inducibility, found in 29 of 204 patients (VT in 13, VF in 16), was associated with diabetes (41.4% vs 20.6%, P = 0.014) and a slightly higher ejection fraction (23.2 ± 5.9 vs 20.5 ± 5.7, P = 0.021). In follow-up, 34.5% of the inducible group (10 of 29) experienced ICD therapy for VT or VF or arrhythmic death versus 12.0% (21 of 175) noninducible patients (hazard ratio = 2.60, P = 0.014).
Conclusions: In DEFINITE patients, inducibility of either VT or VF was associated with an increased likelihood of subsequent ICD therapy for VT or VF, and should be one factor considered in risk stratifying nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients.     

Are Electrophysiological Studies Needed Prior to Defibrillator Implantation?

At present, patients with documented sustained VT or resuscitated cardiac arrest (CA) are treated with ICDs. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate if a routine electrophysiological study should be recommended prior to ICD implantation. In 462 patients referred for ICD implantation because of supposedly documented VT (n = 223) or CA (n = 239), electrophysiological study was routinely performed. In 48% of the patients with CA, sustained VT or VF was inducible. Electrophysiological study suggested conduction abnormalities (n = 11) or supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (n = 3) in conjunction with severely impaired left ventricular function to have been the most likely cause of CA in 14 (5.9%) of 239 patients. Likewise, sustained VT was only inducible in 48% of patients with supposedly documented VT. Of these inducible VTs, nine were diagnosed as right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia or as bundle branch reentry tachycardia. Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias judged to represent the clinical event were the only inducible arrhythmia in 35 (16%) patients (AV nodal reentrant tachycardia [n = 7], AV reentry tachycardia [n = 4], atrial flutter [n = 19], and atrial tachycardia [n = 5]). Based on findings from the electrophysiological study, ICD implantation was withheld in 14 (5.9%) of 239 patients with CA and in 44 (19.7%) of 223 patients with supposedly documented VT. During electrophysiological study, VT or VF was only reproducible in about 50% of patients with supposedly documented VT or CA. Electrophysiological study revealed other, potentially curable causes for CA or supposedly documented VT in 12.6% (58/462) of all patients, indicating that ICD implantation can potentially be avoided or at least postponed in some of these patients. Based on these retrospective data, routine electrophysiological study prior to ICD implantation seems to be advisable.     

A Comparison of Ventricular Arrhythmias Induced with Programmed Stimulation Versus Alternating Current

In patients undergoing implantation and testing of the implantable cardio-verter defibrillator (ICD), alternating current (AC) may be used to induce ventricular tachyarrhythmias in a prompt, safe, and efficient manner. These arrhythmias have been previously reported to be similar to those induced during programmed electrical stimulation (PES). We compared the ventricular tachyarrhythmias induced by both methods in 14 patients: 8 male, 6 female; mean age 61 years; coronary disease in 10, cardiomyopathy in 4; mean ejection fraction 31%. The presenting arrhythmia was nonsustained ventricuiar tachycardia (VT) in four, sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT) in five, ventricular fibrillation (VF) in four, and unknown in one patient with syncope. PES (single, double, triple extrastimuli; burst pacing) and AC (1–2 sec application) stimulation via right ventricular endocardial electrode catheter was performed off antiarrhythmic drugs in the nonsedated state. PES induced SMVT in nine, polymorphic VT in two, and VF in three. AC induced VF in all patients. Although AC can reliably induce ventricular tachyarrhythmias during de/ibrillation threshold and ICD testing, there is poor correlation to PES induced tachyarrhythmias.     

The Value of Exercise Test, Hotter Monitoring, and Programmed Electrical Stimulation in Detection of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

To determine the best way to detect serious ventricular arrhythmia in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), 15 patients with HCM performed an exercise test, had Holter monitoring during 24 hours, and programmed electrical stimulation (PES) in a randomized order, and the presence and type of ventricular arrhythmia was noted. During exercise testing, only one patient demonstrated ventricular tachycardia (VT) just prior to the test. By Holter monitoring, four patients had short episodes of asymptomatic VT. PES, using up to three extrastimuli induced VT or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in ten patients including those with VT during exercise testing and Holter monitoring. There were no differences between patients with and without ventricular arrhythmia during PES regarding age, left ventricular outflow obstruction, thickness of interventricular septum, interventricular septum/posterior wall thickness ratio, corrected QT interval, or the amplitude of the R wave in lead aVR in electrocardiography. Our results indicate that inducible VT/VF during PES is a common finding in patients with HCM. Twenty-four hour Holter monitoring was superior to exercise testing in revealing serious ventricular arrhythmia in those patients.     

Evaluation of Patients with Bundle Branch Block and "Unexplained" Syncope: A Study Based on Comprehensive Electrophysiologic Testing and Ajmaline Stress

Thirty-five patients with bundle branch block (BBB) and unexplained syncope underwent electrophysiologic study (EPS) including programmed ventricular stimulation and ajmaline administration (1 mg/kg, IV) to induce infra-His block. A prolonged HV interval (greater than 55 ms) was present in 16 of the 35 patients. Ajmaline-induced HV block occurred in 12 patients (complete HV block in 10, and 2:1 HV block in two). Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) was inducible in nine (25.7%) and polymorphic VT in two patients (5.7%). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was less than 40% in five patients (45.5%) with inducible VT. Two patients had an unexpected co-existence of inducible HV block and VT. The remaining 14 patients (40%) had no detectable abnormality. The incidence of inducible VT was higher (45% vs 13.3%), and the presence of negative studies was lower (30% vs 53.3%) in patients with structural heart disease (n = 20), when compared to those with no significant heart disease (n = 15) (differences not significant [NS]). During a mean follow-up period of 16.5 +/- 9.2 months, all the patients with inducible HV block have been asymptomatic after having received permanent pacemakers. Patients with inducible monomorphic VT (except one with poor left ventricular function who died suddenly) have also been asymptomatic on antiarrhythmic drugs. Of the remaining patients, seven with normal EPS, two with prolonged HV intervals but no inducible HV block (despite being given permanent pacemakers) and one patient with polymorphic VT on antiarrhythmic drugs continue to have recurrent syncope. Approximately 60% of patients with BBB and unexplained syncope have clinically significant electrophysiologic abnormalities.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Sustained polymorphic arrhythmias induced by programmed ventricular stimulation have prognostic value in patients receiving defibrillators

BACKGROUND: Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) who have monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) induced by programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) are at increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Among a primary prevention population, the prognostic significance of induced polymorphic ventricular arrhythmias is unknown. METHODS: A total of 105 consecutive patients who received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention of SCD in the setting of ICM and non-sustained VT were retrospectively evaluated. Seventy-five patients (group I) had induction of monomorphic VT and 30 patients (group II) had a sustained ventricular arrhythmia other than monomorphic VT (ventricular flutter, ventricular fibrillation, and polymorphic VT) induced during PVS. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between group I and group II except for ejection fraction (25% vs. 31%, P = 0.0001) and QRS duration (123 milliseconds vs. 109 milliseconds, P = 0.04). Sixteen of 75 (21.3%) patients in group I and 6 of 30 (20%) patients in group II received appropriate ICD therapy (P = 0.88). Survival free from ICD therapy was similar between groups (P = 0.54). There was a trend toward increased all-cause mortality among patients in group I by Kaplan-Meier analysis (P = 0.08). However, when adjusted for age, EF, and QRS duration mortality was similar (P = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in rates of appropriate ICD discharge or mortality between patients dichotomized by type of rhythm induced during PVS. These results suggest that patients in this population who have inducible VF or sustained polymorphic VT have similar rates of subsequent clinical ventricular tachyarrhythmias as those with inducible monomorphic VT.     

植入型心律转复除颤器的临床应用及随访观察

目的 :观察我院 8例次植入型心律转复除颤器 (implantablecardioveterdefibrillatorICD)患者的临床疗效及随访情况。方法 :自 1996年 7月至 2 0 0 3年 9月 ,共有 7例患者 (其中 1例更换 1次 )在我院成功安装了ICD。 4例为扩张型心肌病 ,1例为长QT间期综合症 ,1例为多形性室性心     

Electrophysiological Evaluation of Sustained Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden death are particularly prevalent in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC). In contrast to patients with ischemic heart disease, the value of electrophysiological stimulation (EPS) in patients with IDC has not yet been established. To clarify the role of EPS in these patients, we studied 19 patients (58 +/- 11 years) with IDC who had symptomatic ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 26 +/- 9%. Ten patients had survived out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, eight had documented sustained monomorphic VT and one patient had non-sustained VT associated with syncope. Thirteen of the 19 patients (68%) had their clinical ventricular tachyarrhythmias induced at EPS (12 VT, 1 VF). In nine of 13 patients (69%), the arrhythmias were subsequently suppressed during serial electrophysiological drug testing. During 17 +/- 11 months of follow-up, 10/19 (53%) patients experienced recurrence of their arrhythmias and nine out of 19 (47%) patients died; six died suddenly and three secondary to heart failure. There was no difference in arrhythmia recurrence between patients with and without inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias at initial study. Furthermore, suppression of arrhythmia during serial testing did not predict outcome; recurrences were observed in five out of nine patients whose arrhythmias were suppressed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting on Ventricular Arrhythmias: Results with Electrophysiological Testing and Long-Term Follow-Up

Myocardial revascularization was performed in 56 patients with coronary artery disease who presented with ventricular tachycardia (VT) (n = 39) or ventricular fibrillation (n = 17). There were 46 men and 10 women, aged 65 ± 10 years. Three vessel (n = 42) or left main disease (n = 4) was present in 82%. Left ventricular ejection fraction averaged 36%± 11%. Electrophysioiogical studies were performed preoperatively in all patients; 50 (89%) had inducible ventricular arrhythmias. Sustained monomorphic VT was induced in 40 patients (cycle length 284 ± 61 msec). Reproducible symptomatic nonsustained VT was induced in four patients and ventricular fibrillation in six patients, while six patients had no inducible arrhythmia. Preoperatively the patients with inducible VT failed 3.3 ± 1.2 drug trials during electrophysiological studies. In addition to coronary bypass, 22 patients also received an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), 26 patients received prophylactic ICD patches, and 1 patient had resection of a false aneurysm. There were no perioperative deaths. Postoperative electrophysiological studies were performed in all 56 surgical survivors. Ventricular tachyarrhythmia could not be induced in the six patients who had no inducible VT preoperatively and in 13 of 40 (33%) with preoperatively inducible sustained VT or in 19 of 50 (38%) patients with any previously inducible ventricular arrhythmia, thus a totaJ of 25 patients (45%) had no inducible VT postoperatively. Of the remaining, 11 patients were treated with antiarrhythmic drugs alone, 11 had already received an ICD (combined with drugs in 7), and another 9 received the ICD postoperatively (combined with drugs in 4). At a mean foJJow-up of 28 ± 21 months there were 11 deaths (20%): 2 sudden, 5 nonsudden cardiac, and 4 noncardiac deaths. There were 16 nonfatal VT recurrences (29%): 14 among patients with persistently inducible arrhythmias, and onJy 2 among those with no inducible arrhythmia postoperatively (P = 0.004); 13 occurred in patients with an ICD (P = 0.01). Thus among these patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias who underwent revascuJarization, 45% had no inducible arrhythmia postoperatively with 33% of those with preoperatively inducible sustained VT apparently rendered noninducible by revascularization, while the majority (70%) remained free of major arrhythmic events during long-term follow-up. We conclude that myocardial revascularization alone can result in no ventricular arrhythmia induction in selected patients with VT inducible prior to surgery. Long-term follow-up of such patients indicates a low sudden death and arrhythmia recurrence rate. Furthermore, in patients with persistently inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias after coronary revascuJarization, the sudden death rate is low despite a high frequency of nonfatal arrhythmia recurrence when antiarrhythmic medications are guided by programmed stimulation or an ICD is used.     

Amiodarone in the Management of Patients with Ventricular Tachycardia and Ventricular Fibrillation

Fifty-eight patients with symptomatic ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) were treated with amiodarone. All had clinical episodes of VT/VF or inducible VT during electropharmacologic testing despite treatment with maximumtolerated doses of conventional antiarrhythmic agents. Chronic treatment with amiodarone was begun at a dose of 800–1000 mg per day. Thirty-two patients were also treated with a previously ineffective conventional agent. Thirty patients underwent programmed ventricular stimulation after 2.6 ± 1.7 months (mean ± S. D.) of treatment with amiodarone at a mean daily dose of 588 ± 155 mg. VT was induced in 25 patients (sustained in 20, nonsustained in five). Seventeen patients had a recurrence of VT or VF after 0.5–9 months of treatment with amiodarone (fatal in seven, non-fatal in 10). Forty-one patients (71%) had no recurrence of symptomatic VT or VF while being treated with amiodarone (mean follow-up period, 17.1 ± 12.4 months). Among the 25 patients who had inducible VT with programmed ventricular stimulation while being treated with amiodarone, 19 patients (76%) have had no recurrence of symptomatic VT or VF overa follow-up period of 21.5 ± 7.3 months. Ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings obtained after one week of treatment with amiodarone were not helpful in predicting clinical response. Twenty-two patients (38%) developed ataxia and/or an intention tremor which improved with a decrease in the amiodarone dose. Amiodarone, either by itself or in combination with conventional antiarrhythmic drugs, has a significant therapeutic effect in high risk patients with refractory VT. The finding of inducible VT during electropharmacologic testing in patients taking amiodarone does not preclude a favorable clinical response. Neurologic toxicity is common in patients treated with 600–800 mg per day of amiodarone.     

Safe performance of magnetic resonance imaging on a patient with an ICD

This is a report on a patient with an implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) who intentionally underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of a malignant brain tumor. To avoid inadequate detection of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF), the ICD was inactivated by programming the VT-detection and VT/VF-therapy status off. The patient came through the protocol safely and without any difficulty or discomfort. There was no arrhythmic event. MRI affected neither programmed data nor the function of the ICD system.     

Excellent Long‐Term Reproducibility of the Electrophysiologic Efficacy of Quinidine in Patients with Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation and Brugada Syndrome

Background: Quinidine is very effective in preventing the reinduction of sustained ventricular fibrillation (VF) during electrophysiologic study (EPS) in patients with idiopathic VF and Brugada syndrome. However, there are no data on the long‐term reproducibility of this EP efficacy. Methods and Results: Nine patients (seven males and two females, aged 21–72 years), who suffered from aborted cardiac arrest (n = 8) or recurrent syncope (n = 1) due to Brugada syndrome (n = 5) or idiopathic VF (n = 4), comprised the study. All patients had inducible sustained VF at baseline that was prevented by quinidine therapy and underwent another EPS on medication after 1.7–23.6 (9.8 ± 6.8) years (>5 years in eight patients). Two patients underwent two late EPS on quinidine. The goal of repeat EPS on quinidine was to ensure persistent long‐term drug efficacy (n = 6) or to elucidate the reason of syncopal episodes during therapy (n = 3). The EPS protocol significantly evolved over the years as it became more aggressive (more pacing sites and/or more ventricular extrastimuli). All nine patients tolerated the medication well and had no recurrent documented arrhythmic events during long‐term follow‐up (mean 15 ± 7 years). No sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias could be induced in any patient during repeat late EPS. In six patients, a more aggressive stimulation protocol could be tested at repeat EPS. Conclusion: The long‐term reproducibility of the EP efficacy of quinidine in patients with idiopathic VF and Brugada syndrome is excellent. EP‐guided quinidine therapy represents a valuable long‐term alternative to ICD therapy in these patients.     

Induced Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia in Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Dependence on Clinical Presentation and Response to Antiarrhythmic Agents

Thirty-one patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy either idiopathic or due to regurgitant valvular disease were studied in the cardiac electrophysiology lab. The indications for study were sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 26, ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 11, and syncope of unknown etiology in 4. Sustained VT was reproducibly induced in 17 patients, including 12 with a history of sustained VT, 2 with VF and 3 with syncope. Of 15 patients undergoing serial antiarrhythmic drug studies, sustained VT was rendered noninducible or nonsustained in 23. Three had recurrent arrhythmic events while on therapy predicted to be effective. One of 2 patients discharged on a regimen predicted to be ineffective had a recurrence of sustained VT that resulted in cardiac arrest. Of 14 patients in whom sustained VT could not he reproducibly induced, 2 subsequently had spontaneous occurrences of sustained VT, and 2 experienced aborted sudden death. These results suggest the following; (1) the induction of sustained VT in the setting of nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy is dependent on the clinical presentation; (2) antiarrhythmic drugs frequently render sustained VT noninducible or nonsustained; (3) antiarrhythmic drug suppression of inducible sustained VT predicts long-term prevention of spontaneous recurrences; and (4) noninducibility of sustained VT in the baseline state does not predict freedom from subsequent episodes of VT or sudden death.     

EFFICACY OF LOWER-ENERGY BIPHASIC SHOCKS FOR TRANSTHORACIC DEFIBRILLATION: A FOLLOW-UP CLINICAL STUDY

Objective. This clinical study prospectively evaluated the first-shock defibrillation efficacy of 150-joule impedance-compensated, 200-µF biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) shocks in patients with electrically-induced ventricular fibrillation (VF), and compared it with a historical control group treated with 200-J monophasic damped sine (MDS) shocks. Methods. Ventricular tachyarrhythmias were induced in patients undergoing electrophysiologic (EP) testing for ventricular arrhythmias or testing of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). A 150-J shock was delivered as the primary therapy to terminate induced arrhythmias in the EP group, and as a “rescue” shock when a single ICD shock failed to terminate the arrhythmias in the ICD group. Results. Ninety-six patients received study shocks. The preshock rhythm was classified as VF in 77 patients and as ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 19 patients. First-shock success rates for VF and VT were 75 out of 77 (97.4%) and 19 out of 19 (100%) for the 150-J BTE compared with the historical control rates of 61 out of 68 (89.7%) and 29 out of 31 (94%) for 200-J MDS. The first-shock success rate for VF treated with 150-J BTE was technically equivalent to that of 200-J MDS (p = 0.001). The transthoracic impedance did not vary between groups, yet the peak current delivered by the 150-J BTE shock was about 50% lower. Conclusions. This study demonstrated that 150-J shocks of this impedance-compensated, 200-µF BTE waveform provided very high efficacy for defibrillation of short duration, electrically-induced VF. These lower-energy biphasic shocks had a success rate equivalent to that of 200-J MDS shocks, and they provided this efficacy while exposing patients to much less current than the monophasic shocks.     

Role of programmed ventricular stimulation and implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and syncope

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of programmed ventricular stimulation and ICDs in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and syncope. Between 1990 and 1998, 54 (mean age 67+/-11 years, 76% men) patients presented with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and syncope. An electrophysiological study was done in 37 of the 54 patients: 10 had inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, 12 had conduction system disease or neurocardiogenic syncope, and 15 had a normal study. Overall, 17 patients received an ICD, 15 patients received a pacemaker, and 22 patients received no device. Nine of the 15 patients with a negative electrophysiological study eventually received an ICD: 3 because they were considered high risk and 6 because of recurrent syncope or presyncope. In the 17 patients who received an ICD, incidence of appropriate shocks at 1 and 3 years was 47% and 74%, respectively, in the inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia group, and 40% and 40%, respectively, in the group without inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (P = 0.29, log-rank test). In conclusion, programmed ventricular stimulation is not useful in risk stratification of patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and syncope and may delay necessary ICD implantation.     

Ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for primary versus secondary prophylaxis indications

Introduction: Data on the mechanisms of sudden cardiac death are limited and may be biased by delays in rhythm recording and selection bias in survivors. As a result, the relative contributions of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) (cycle length [CL] > 260 ms), monomorphic fast VT (FVT) (CL ≤ 260 ms), and polymorphic VT (PMVT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) have not been well characterized nor compared in patients with and without prior arrhythmic events. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) recipients with primary or secondary implant indications was used to evaluate intracardiac electrograms (EGMs) for the first spontaneous VT/VF resulting in appropriate ICD therapy. EGMs were categorized into VT, FVT, and PMVT/VF based on CL and morphologic criteria. Results: Of 616 implants, 145 patients (58 [40%] primary indications) received appropriate ICD therapy for VT/VF over mean follow‐up of 3.8 ± 3.2 years. Primary implants had more diabetes (28% vs 12%; P = 0.02) and less antiarrhythmic use (15% vs 33%; P = 0.02). In those patients with spontaneous arrhythmia, PMVT/VF occurred in 20.7% of primary versus 21.8% of secondary implants, FVT in 19.0% versus 21.8%, and VT in 60.3% versus 56.4%, respectively (P = 0.88). Spontaneous VT CL was similar regardless of implant indication (284 ± 56 [primary] vs 286 ± 67 ms [secondary]; P = 0.92). Conclusions: Monomorphic VT is the most common cause of appropriate ICD therapy regardless of implant indication. These results provide insight into the mechanisms of sudden cardiac death and have implications for the use of interventions designed to limit ICD shocks. (PACE 2011; 34:571–576)     

Electrophysiologic studies of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy presenting with syncope of undetermined etiology

Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC) have a high risk of sudden death. The best clinical predictors of sudden death from HC are young age, strong family history of sudden death, ventricular tachycardia (VT), and progression of symptoms such as syncope. We performed 24-hour Holter monitoring and electrophysiologic studies (EPS) on 26 patients with HC, some with the obstructive form of the disease and some with syncope, in order to predict their vulnerability to syncope and to potentially malignant arrhythmias. Holter monitoring demonstrated supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in 9/26 patients whereas atrial programmed electrical stimulation induced SVT in 17/26 patients. Of the 17 patients, nine had symptomatic hypotension with SVT while lying supine. Holter monitoring demonstrated nonsustained VT in 7/26 patients whereas ventricular programmed electrical stimulation induced VT or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 6/26 patients. The patient who had the longest run of nonsustained VT on Holter had VF induced by ventricular programmed electrical stimulation. He was cardioverted to normal sinus rhythm with no untoward effects. We found that atrial programmed electrical stimulation induced SVT with hypotension best predicted a history of syncope in these patients. Although one patient required direct current cardioversion, EPS was conducted safely in all patients. Further long-term studies are needed to demonstrate the value of clinical decisions based upon EPS in patients with HC.     

Effect of Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy on the Incidence of Shocks in Patients who Receive an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator after a Single Episode of Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia/Fibrillation

Seventy-four patients (16 women, 58 men, age 58 ± 21 years, mean ± standard deviation) who received an implantable Cardioverter de/ibrillator (ICD) after experiencing a single episode of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation were followed to determine if antiarrhythmic drug therapy affects the incidence of ICD discharges. Thirty-three patients (group A) were treated with an antiarrhythmic drug that was either untested or previously demonstrated during electropharmacological testing to be ineffective in suppressing the induction of ventricular tachycardia. Forty-one patients (group B) were not treated with an antiarrhythmic drug. There were no significant differences between the two groups in regards to age, sex, incidence of coronary artery disease, left ventricular function or the type of ICD pulse generator used. During a mean follow-up of 14 months for the entire cohort, 15 patients (46%) in group A and 18 patients (44%) in group B experienced at least one ICD shock. The time to the first appropriate shock (5 ± 5 months in both groups) and the frequency of ICD shocks (0.3 ± 0.2/month in group A vs 0.4 ± 0.5/month in group B) were similar in both groups. The incidence of syncope at the time of ICD discharge was higher in group A than group B patients (31% vs 5%, P < 0.05). In conclusion, antiarrhythmic drugs that are untested or have failed electropharmacological testing do not appear to reduce the probability of ICD discharge over a short-term (mean 14 months) follow-up in patients who have had only one clinical episode of VT/VF and may increase the risk of syncope during ICD discharge. Studies with a larger sample size and longer follow-up period will be needed to confirm these findings.     

Intraoperative Mapping is Not Necessary for VT Surgery

Surgical ablation of ventricular tachycardia is generally guided by the results of pre- and intraoperative cardiac mapping. However, in certain situations intraoperative cardiac mapping may not be possible and, therefore, surgery has to be based on information obtained preoperatively. This raises the question whether intraoperative mapping is necessary for the success of this approach. We describe our experience with encircling endocar-dial cryoablation for ischemic VT and examine the contribution of intraoperative mapping for this procedure. Thirty-three patients with inducibie VT refractory to medical therapy and a well defined anatomic scar were considered for surgery. All patients underwent baseline electrophysiology study and intraoperative mapping was attempted during normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. In 14 patients, VT was inducibie intraoperatively (Group 1) and surgical ablation was guided by this information, whereasin 19patients, VT could not be mapped for various reasons (Group 2). Reasons for failure to obtain intraoperative map included noninducibility (3), nonsustained VT (8), polymorphic VT (4), VF (3), and incessant VT with hemodynamic collapse and cardiac arrest (1). The two groups did not differ with respect to age, location of myocardial infarction, or preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction. The operative procedures were similarin the twogroups with respect to aortic cross clamp time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, number of cryoablation lesions, concomitant revascularization, aneurysmectomy, and ICD implantation. Encircling endocardial cryoablation was performed in 32 patients and one patient underwent partial right ventricular free wall disconnection (RV infarct). Thirteen patients underwent concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (5 in Group 1 and 8 in group 2). One patient had prophylactic ICD patches (Group 1). The mean LVEF pre- and postoperatively were similar in the two groups. One patient died postoperatively. Three patients had recurrent VT perioperatively: one patient was treated with amiodarone and two had an ICD implantation. During long-term follow-up (mean 5 years), survival was similar in the two groups. Conclusions: Encircling endocardial cryoablation for ventricular tachycardia is a useful surgical technique in selected patients. Preoperative cardiac mapping is useful in defining a surgical plan, but intraoperative mapping is not crucial to the success of encircling endocardial cryoablation.     

Prevention of Inappropriate Shocks in ICD Recipients: A Review of 10,000 Tachycardia Episodes

Background: The efficacy of dual-chamber ICD arrhythmia classification algorithms is crucial to prevent inappropriate shocks. We report our experience from a meta-analysis of five prospective clinical studies with inclusion phases ranging between 1997 and 2003.
Methods: Dual-chamber ICD using standard dual-chamber arrhythmia classification algorithms were implanted in 802 patients (mean age = 64 ± 11 years, 88% men) in 74 medical centers. The ICD indication was secondary prevention in 95% of patients. Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVT) were previously documented in 26% of patients. All spontaneous tachyarrhythmic events documented by the device memories were analyzed by a adjudicating committee. The episodes lasting >12 seconds and/or treated by the ICD were analyzed.
Results: Over a mean follow-up of 302 ± 113 days, 9,690 events were reported. Mean heart rate at the time of events was 131 ± 45 bpm (100–430). Events were classified as oversensing in 1.4%, sinus tachycardia (ST) in 66%, SVT in 13%, slow (<150 bpm) ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 8.7%, and VT or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 10.3%. The sensitivity of slow VT detection was 94%, and of VT/VF detection 99.3%. The specificity of sinus rhythm/ST/SVT recognition was 94%, positive predictive value 79.3%, and negative predictive value 99.2%. A total of 1,918 episodes were treated in 330 patients: 1,472 appropriately in 213, and 446 inappropriately in 117 (15% of the overall population) patients. Only 62 episodes were inappropriately treated by shocks in 40 patients, representing 5% of the overall population.
Conclusions: In this conventional ICD population, the overall specificity of standard dual-chamber arrhythmia detection settings reached 94%. This feature allows efficient detection of fast as well as slow VT events with a very low rate of inappropriate shocks.